Talk:1123: The Universal Label

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 21:06, 19 October 2012 by 208.54.40.210 (talk) (minor tweak of my recent comment.)
Jump to: navigation, search

I think Randall may be going for another pun with the title text, as "H" is the chemical symbol for hydrogen.--Dangerkeith3000 (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


I suspect that without Helium and a little Lithium we wouldn't even be here discussing this. These were both formed independently of Hydrogen shortly after the BB and without them the first stars would have been huge and short-lived...62.255.252.76 14:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


But you can make matter using energy, therefore, you only need energy and time! Ray


The label's missing energy. Just saying. Davidy22 (talk) 04:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

But isn't it somehow contained in the hydrogen? I don't know squat about quantum physics, so I'm probably wrong. 108.233.253.211 04:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Actually, the amount of energy in any grocery or non-grocery (even in explosives) is significally lower that the amount of energy in hydrogen used for their creation. Sure, you need energy to grow crops, but where does that energy come from? Hydrogen fusion in Sun - which is first step of creating the carbon the crop is from (not the same crop, of course). -- Hkmaly (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

So when Mussolini made the trains run on thyme he was really making them run on hydrogen and time?--Pmakholm (talk) 08:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


I think this is the smallest xkcd comic ever. :-) --85.159.196.21 09:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

It's also the first in a long time to make me laugh out loud! Steve B.


I suspect Randall was influenced by this quote: "Given enough time, hydrogen starts to wonder where it came from, and where it is going", attributed to Edward R. Harrison. --Prooffreader (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


Actually, I'm not sure you can make antimatter with just regular hydrogen.

--85.159.196.21 11:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Why would food contain antimatter? --Kronf (talk) 12:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

I think I've spotted my first Randall mistake. Using this ingredient list, The amount of time must exceed the amount of hydrogen (unless the product is hydrogen) thus Time should be listed first on the label. — Comment by 14:09, 19 October 2012 (talk) Anthingy (please sign your comments)

Which units are you using? How do you relate a cup full of Time and a day full of Hydrogen? 67.51.59.66 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that may be a mistake, but the FDA website mentions "predominance by weight." I'm not sure how time would compare to hydrogen in that respect. Also I translated thyme = H+time = tHime. --207.170.250.186 14:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Also, it's not Randall's first mistake, he made some in the last comic. ??? 14:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Implying the above commentor is Randall. 76.122.5.96 15:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Time is not a proper ingredient like hydrogen. It is permitted in Randall's ingredient list by cartoon license.


"Because all matter was originally created through stellar nuclear fusion from hydrogen over time" Nuclear fusion only explains the creation of all elements up to iron. Heavier elements are created by other processes: [1] [2] [3] [4]

The fusion of heavier elements is still fusion, even if it takes a supernova to make it happen. Nothing in the cartoon suggests that only the fusion reactions found in stable stars apply, and even more complicated processes (fusion+fission, whatever) involves matter that ultimately has a hydrogen pedigree. (I am, however, intrigued by the comment about helium and lithium in the early universe. I have some of those around here somewhere.) 208.54.40.210 21:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)