Difference between revisions of "Talk:1188: Bonding"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(add interpretation comments.)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
    
 
    
 
Pretty sure the code is also intentionally hard to follow.
 
Pretty sure the code is also intentionally hard to follow.
 +
 +
 +
The try/catch parts are just for show, they cancel each other out.
 +
The structure is that you have a parent and a child instance (of class P), each has a 'target' pointed to the other.
 +
Then calling aim with a ball will call the others aim with the ball, which will call the firsts aim with the ball. Etc etc.
 +
 +
I guess after about a 1000 aims the jvm will throw you out, stating stack overflow, and the bonding game is over.

Revision as of 06:22, 20 March 2013

The aim method results in an infinite loop/stack overflow, note that ball is an exception of type Ball. This results in a logical flow of aim, "throw," "catch," repeat, though this is only logical by word choice, and is nonsensical from a programming perspective.

Pretty sure the code is also intentionally hard to follow.


The try/catch parts are just for show, they cancel each other out. The structure is that you have a parent and a child instance (of class P), each has a 'target' pointed to the other. Then calling aim with a ball will call the others aim with the ball, which will call the firsts aim with the ball. Etc etc.

I guess after about a 1000 aims the jvm will throw you out, stating stack overflow, and the bonding game is over.