Difference between revisions of "Talk:1770: UI Change"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(I'm an idiot)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Pretty funny how the explainer so far focused on physical deterioration (old people's bodies beginning to fail) with respect to the offscreen comment. Randall is an environmentalist like everyone else, but even he clearly acknowledges in this comic that the point is mental deterioration and intelligence decrease with age -- failure to grasp things such as interfaces as fast as before. It's not about motor performance at all. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> {{unsigned ip|162.158.203.145}}
 
Pretty funny how the explainer so far focused on physical deterioration (old people's bodies beginning to fail) with respect to the offscreen comment. Randall is an environmentalist like everyone else, but even he clearly acknowledges in this comic that the point is mental deterioration and intelligence decrease with age -- failure to grasp things such as interfaces as fast as before. It's not about motor performance at all. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> {{unsigned ip|162.158.203.145}}
:That's somewhat right, but I think that getting old means that you find it much harder to understand new things, but the things you could always do well you still can, except into much older ages. But I have no proof of this, it's just my experience. I'm open to being proved wrong by a study. Also, please don't nowiki your "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" at the end of your comment, it defeats the purpose.
+
:That's somewhat right, but I think that getting old means that you find it much harder to understand new things, but the things you could always do well you still can, except into much older ages. But I have no proof of this, it's just my experience. I'm open to being proved wrong by a study. Also, please don't nowiki your "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" at the end of your comment, it defeats the purpose. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.60|162.158.2.60]] 11:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
  
 
Title text scenario: the ''Windows 8 removed START button'' was reintroduced first via community hacks ("classic shell"), then officially with version 8.1 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_8#Upgraded_versions (ref.WIKI)] and is still there now (W10 - but, how long for?): sometimes it just makes sense to go back, IF/WHEN possible [[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.218|162.158.150.218]] 15:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 
Title text scenario: the ''Windows 8 removed START button'' was reintroduced first via community hacks ("classic shell"), then officially with version 8.1 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_8#Upgraded_versions (ref.WIKI)] and is still there now (W10 - but, how long for?): sometimes it just makes sense to go back, IF/WHEN possible [[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.218|162.158.150.218]] 15:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:12, 10 December 2016

Man, Facebook Android App did this just this morning! Comments are broken!Seebert (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Pretty funny how the explainer so far focused on physical deterioration (old people's bodies beginning to fail) with respect to the offscreen comment. Randall is an environmentalist like everyone else, but even he clearly acknowledges in this comic that the point is mental deterioration and intelligence decrease with age -- failure to grasp things such as interfaces as fast as before. It's not about motor performance at all. ~~~~ 162.158.203.145 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

That's somewhat right, but I think that getting old means that you find it much harder to understand new things, but the things you could always do well you still can, except into much older ages. But I have no proof of this, it's just my experience. I'm open to being proved wrong by a study. Also, please don't nowiki your "~~~~" at the end of your comment, it defeats the purpose. 162.158.2.60 11:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Title text scenario: the Windows 8 removed START button was reintroduced first via community hacks ("classic shell"), then officially with version 8.1 (ref.WIKI) and is still there now (W10 - but, how long for?): sometimes it just makes sense to go back, IF/WHEN possible 162.158.150.218 15:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

The title text has two levels: both Application interfaces and getting old. Randall is likely referencing Google's Calico lab which made a minor media buzz in 2013 with headlines like CNN's, "How Google's Calico aims to fight aging and 'solve death'. The MSN feed recently featured one of these stories along with Microsoft trying to "solve" cancer. 162.158.58.52 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

" products claiming to grant it have all been shams" That is exactly what they want you to believe! Elektrizikekswerk (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Psst!, the title text is politics duh. Old people protest with their vote to change things back. Now if they are angry enough, politicians will change things back, right? 'Cause that's always possible.--162.158.114.148 16:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure the "getting old" refers to loss of physical and mental function so much as "arbitrary" changes in society's "user interface": newspapers disappearing, face-to-face socializing being displaced by on-line interactions, job discrimination against older workers (especially those who haven't updated their skills), etc. 162.158.214.64 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)


Maybe a reference to the reddit iOS app randomly swapping the positions of upvote/downvote and the share button? 162.158.75.30 15:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

If the changes only were permanent this time 172.68.51.47 09:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)