Difference between revisions of "Talk:1901: Logical"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Added the title text to the explanation and transcript. --[[User:JayRulesXKCD|'''JayRules''XKCD'''  ]]<sup>[[User talk:JayRulesXKCD|what's up?]]</sup> 16:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 
Added the title text to the explanation and transcript. --[[User:JayRulesXKCD|'''JayRules''XKCD'''  ]]<sup>[[User talk:JayRulesXKCD|what's up?]]</sup> 16:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
For the record I believe the advantages of using statistics over intuition were thoroughly discussed in the Michael Lewis book [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyball|''Moneyball''], also 538 has done studies comparing statistical approaches to election prediction to political punditry and finally the good old [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_Problem|Monty Hall Problem].[[User:Sturmovik|Sturmovik]] ([[User talk:Sturmovik|talk]]) 16:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:22, 11 October 2017

Potentially relevant: [1] Potentially relevant: [2] Potentially relevant: [3] Joshupetersen (talk) 16:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Added the title text to the explanation and transcript. --JayRulesXKCD what's up? 16:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

For the record I believe the advantages of using statistics over intuition were thoroughly discussed in the Michael Lewis book Moneyball, also 538 has done studies comparing statistical approaches to election prediction to political punditry and finally the good old Hall Problem.Sturmovik (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)