Difference between revisions of "Talk:386: Duty Calls"
(gave the answer) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think its good. Hits on all the points, unless anyone sees differently I think it adequately explains the comic. I think all the editing from here is flow and stylistic stuff. And that's minimal. --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 20:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | I think its good. Hits on all the points, unless anyone sees differently I think it adequately explains the comic. I think all the editing from here is flow and stylistic stuff. And that's minimal. --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 20:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | It's a Cunningham's law reference, guys, that's it. | + | It's a Cunningham's law reference, guys, that's it. {{unsigned ip|141.101.106.155}} |
Revision as of 16:15, 26 February 2015
Doesn't look like anyone's touched this during its spotlight as the Incomplete Article of the Day. But really, what else can we say? 199.27.128.66 03:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Maybe how deeply compelling the "need" to fix something wrong on the Internet is? It's not just a plain correction.... it gnaws at you...108.162.219.8 03:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Tried to flesh out/improve the analysis. Still needs some editing for clarity [I'm not sure how formal the tone of this wiki is supposed to be?] but hopefully it's an improvement on the previous edit. 108.162.216.56 17:47, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I think its good. Hits on all the points, unless anyone sees differently I think it adequately explains the comic. I think all the editing from here is flow and stylistic stuff. And that's minimal. --Lackadaisical (talk) 20:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
It's a Cunningham's law reference, guys, that's it. 141.101.106.155 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
