<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.246.120</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.246.120"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120"/>
		<updated>2026-06-27T05:38:19Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=369:_Dangers&amp;diff=126117</id>
		<title>369: Dangers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=369:_Dangers&amp;diff=126117"/>
				<updated>2016-09-03T04:30:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 369&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = Jan 11, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Dangers&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = dangers.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Zero results: 'snake charming' and 'haberdashery'. (Things like 'car' and 'boating' and such are of course the highest, by a huge margin.)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a chart of the frequency of certain phrases in Google search results, based on the format &amp;quot;died in a ______ accident.&amp;quot; If you enclose search terms in quotation marks, Google will look up the exact phrase rather than the individual words in any order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gardening accident&amp;quot; is a reference to the mockumentary ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_Spinal_Tap This Is Spinal Tap,]'' in which one of the band's many ill-fated drummers died in this fashion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Died in a blogging accident&amp;quot; was very rare in Google {{w|Observer effect|until this comic appeared}}. It could be found on over 10,000 webpages approximately 12 hours after the comic was posted. Similarly, both snake charming and haberdashery accidents also return hundreds of Google results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Dangers&lt;br /&gt;
:Indexed by the number of Google results for&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Died in a _____ Accident&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[A bar chart showing &amp;quot;Type of Accident&amp;quot; vs &amp;quot;Google Results&amp;quot; each with a bar representing a number]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Skydiving: 710&lt;br /&gt;
:Elevator: 575&lt;br /&gt;
:Surfing: 496&lt;br /&gt;
:Skateboarding: 473&lt;br /&gt;
:Camping: 166&lt;br /&gt;
:Gardening: 100&lt;br /&gt;
:Ice Skating: 94&lt;br /&gt;
:Knitting: 7&lt;br /&gt;
:Blogging: 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bar chart]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google Search]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1675:_Message_in_a_Bottle&amp;diff=119232</id>
		<title>Talk:1675: Message in a Bottle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1675:_Message_in_a_Bottle&amp;diff=119232"/>
				<updated>2016-05-04T02:54:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: Added my take on SMS&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The title text reminds me of the song {{w|Message in a Bottle (song)|Message in a Bottle}} by Police. ;-) Maybe enough that it should be part of the explanation? [[User:|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Why not? Seems to fit the description. [[User:Jacoder23|Jacoder23]] ([[User talk:Jacoder23|talk]]) 14:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Checked the lyrics, there isn't a line that resembles the text I'm afraid, Randall isn't making a reference here. Missed opportunity! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.158|108.162.250.158]] 01:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Are you sure? Walked out this morning; Don't believe what I saw; A hundred billion bottles; Washed up on the shore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be worth mentioning that in certain mailing lists or mass emails people use &amp;quot;reply all&amp;quot; to unsubscribe or otherwise request being removed from the recipients list of future messages; meaning everyone else's inbox gets clogged with unsubscribe requests even though the message only needed to go to the originator. (The best part is the people who reply all to tell the other people to stop using reply all.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.242|108.162.237.242]] 14:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We have had a run of this at work. There are really many possible recipients at work. It went exactly as you noted. The most funny was those complaining about those replying to all when complaining about the replying to all spam... and then doing so by replying to all!  And the best was that after a week people getting home from holiday began it all again by replying to all on the original message that started it all ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't there another xkcd comic involving messages in a bottle? I feel like this comic might be related to that one but I cannot find the other one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.68.83|162.158.68.83]] 14:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we're talking about problems to do with reply to all and mailing list, this story is always a good read: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/exchange/2004/04/08/me-too/ [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.54|141.101.98.54]] 14:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript: The curvy writing might also indicate that the paper was not kept perfectly dry inside the bottle. --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.240|198.41.242.240]] 15:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation of the main comic doesn't seem to provide much of an explanation. Here's how I read the comic:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This comic is about how hard it is to unsubscribe from some email lists. 'Unsubscribe' links often don't work (perhaps intentionally). In desperation, someone has tried to send their 'unsubscribe' request in a bottle, hoping in vain that it will have its intended effect. Instead, Cueball receives it. The title-text slightly shifts the premise: now Cueball is the intended recipient, an incompetent email list operator who replies in the wrong way, triggering the problem described in the current title-text explanation. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.70.229|141.101.70.229]] 16:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Adam&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've added my own, somewhat nihilistic, interpretation of the original message. Despair and hopelessness are not topics that XCKD often delves in, but similar themes have appeared in some of the earlier comics. My interpretation may not be correct, but given earlier comics on the topic of heartbreak, and some news of serious health problems affecting the creator's life, I believe it is valid speculation. I did place it higher on the page than I would have liked, but I couldn't find a better place for it. I think it's worth keeping in, in some form, but if a few people feel otherwise, I won't engage in an edit war. [[User:Potato|Potato]] ([[User talk:Potato|talk]]) 02:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think this flows naturally from the comic, I think you're stretching it a bit to be honest, but instead of deleting I've moved it after the next paragraph just so it flows better [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.158|108.162.250.158]] 06:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: correspondence by message in a bottle is, in my memory, a common trope. beloved of tom and jerry at least. i read it that this new message was personal to cueball. that the message was a response to a previous bottle and that the recipient of that wanted nothing more to do ''with cueball''. but, then, i'm dumb. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.84|141.101.98.84]] 12:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, quick story about me! I'm in charge of the email list and sending emails for the fencing club I'm in. I make sure to include a &amp;quot;click here to unsubscribe&amp;quot; link at the bottom of every email, as well as instructions on how to unsubscribe without using the link (because I'm using a Google Groups to manage the list). I've even tested the link several times with my own email. However, in spite of this, every couple weeks somebody sends a &amp;quot;reply all&amp;quot; Unsubscribe request from somebody who joined the email list before I was in charge of it. It gets pretty annoying, actually, since everybody ends up getting more of these &amp;quot;reply all&amp;quot; unsubscribe requests than actual emails from the club. Plus, it's easier for them to remove themselves from the email list than it is for me to remove them.&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the time, I just respond with an email from my own account (so there's no danger of accidentally replying to everyone) saying &amp;quot;Hey. If you look at the email, there's instructions on how to unsubscribe. If you can't figure out the instructions, here's my email (_________@___.__). Please tell me what's confusing about the instructions so I can improve them.&amp;quot; I can relate to this comic, though. Pretty funny. End story time.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jeudi Violist|Jeudi Violist]] ([[User talk:Jeudi Violist|talk]]) 20:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unsubscribe [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.79|108.162.219.79]] 20:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the timing of this comic, this is surely a reference (at least a partial one) to [http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/message-in-bottle-found-steve-mershon_uk_571f28e8e4b0a1e971ca56eb this news story] about a recently found message in a bottle. Or am I over-correlating? [[User:PabloVergos|PabloVergos]] ([[User talk:PabloVergos|talk]]) 08:27, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks to me that what was written on the note was unsub5cribe which even if intercepted by the automated mail manager would have been not interpreted as a command and would have been sent to the list instead of performing the intended action. Generally, most mailing lists have a separate e-mail address to send commands to but some allow commands to the list address. [[User:Rleblanc|Rleblanc]] ([[User talk:Rleblanc|talk]]) 18:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of Un (reverse action) + subscribe (the verb, not gonna parse it further), the morphemes could be parsed as: Un (not) + sub (short for submarine / underwater) + scribe (a person who writes): It's the signature line from a correspondent who isn't underwater. Perhaps the bottle was supposed to go to Atlantis to a mermaid penpal? :p [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.98|108.162.221.98]] 22:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I initially read the comic, the single-word message &amp;quot;unsubscribe&amp;quot; brought to mind commercial SMS services which accept similar responses to automatically disable message lists. Nonetheless, the reference to &amp;quot;reply all&amp;quot; in the alt text does make email as the inspiration more likely. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 02:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1336:_Transformers&amp;diff=61441</id>
		<title>Talk:1336: Transformers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1336:_Transformers&amp;diff=61441"/>
				<updated>2014-02-28T23:36:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wow, this really is a departure from Randall's usual style. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess it would have been impossible to make robot as stick figures and make people recognize them as robots...., hence I think this is a one-off [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: This '[[600:_Android_Boyfriend]]' is the only other &amp;quot;Robot&amp;quot; strip I can think off [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this a nod to Perry Bible Fellowship in some way? It seems more like a PBF strip. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.37|141.101.98.37]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree, I thought of PBF too. Is there a category here for &amp;quot;Comics with non-stick-figure characters&amp;quot;? - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 14:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went to PBF to see if there was a cross-over, but I was disappointed.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.135|108.162.210.135]] 18:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticons, maybe? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.57|108.162.216.57]] 19:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is reminiscent of the style in which David Attenborough would present this sort of metamorphosis in nature. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 23:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Any better hint? Sounds nice. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, more specifically, anything from his Life series, especially &amp;quot;Life in the Undergrowth&amp;quot;, which focuses primarily on insects and arachnids. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 23:36, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1336:_Transformers&amp;diff=61437</id>
		<title>Talk:1336: Transformers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1336:_Transformers&amp;diff=61437"/>
				<updated>2014-02-28T23:01:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: David Attenborough&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wow, this really is a departure from Randall's usual style. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess it would have been impossible to make robot as stick figures and make people recognize them as robots...., hence I think this is a one-off [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: This '[[600:_Android_Boyfriend]]' is the only other &amp;quot;Robot&amp;quot; strip I can think off [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this a nod to Perry Bible Fellowship in some way? It seems more like a PBF strip. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.37|141.101.98.37]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree, I thought of PBF too. Is there a category here for &amp;quot;Comics with non-stick-figure characters&amp;quot;? - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 14:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went to PBF to see if there was a cross-over, but I was disappointed.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.135|108.162.210.135]] 18:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticons, maybe? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.57|108.162.216.57]] 19:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is reminiscent of the style in which David Attenborough would present this sort of metamorphosis in nature. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 23:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1329:_Standing&amp;diff=60013</id>
		<title>Talk:1329: Standing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1329:_Standing&amp;diff=60013"/>
				<updated>2014-02-14T08:16:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I was bold, and made a start on the page. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.6|141.101.98.6]] 10:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the part which is really bad about &amp;quot;sitting&amp;quot; work is being in same position all day. I'm sure standing all day would be just as unhealthy (and more tiring), while the deer would be even more tiring and probably lower productivity. Even walking is not as ideal if you walk on treadmill, because it's too flat. So, real solution is having desk which would automatically (so you don't forget) change height periodically, forcing you to spend part of work sitting, part standing and part searching for repairman to fix the desk after it will get stuck again. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The research conclusion is simple: The more you sit the earlier you die. True, there are no conclusions on those who stand most of the day. I mix sitting and standing at work. My adjustable height desk works fine. ''&amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 13:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
:: You say &amp;quot;The more you sit the earlier you die&amp;quot;. Obviously, dying earlier means less time for sitting so the more you sit the less you sit. *SCNR* &lt;br /&gt;
PS: The argument of &amp;quot;we are not built&amp;quot; is flawed. Humans are built to be mostly dead in thirty, forty if they are lucky. The reason cavemen were healthier that we are is not because of healthy exercise. It's because if he developed back pain problems, something eated him soon. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Humans were living 70 or 80 years several millennia ago. True, most died by age 40 from a variety of hazards modern humans don't face. The theoretical maximum age hasn't changed. It's been stuck at 120 for millennia. ''&amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 13:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Theoretical maximum&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;observed median&amp;quot; are probably different numbers. The second one seems like it would be more relevant to the discussion of general health trends over time.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.59|108.162.216.59]] 15:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone notice that it's a part of the My Hobby series? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.30|108.162.219.30]] 11:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Somebody has - it is now part of that category as seen at the bottom of the page. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the comic, Cueball tells Megan that standing desks are still not the apex of innovation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Where exactly &amp;quot;in the comic&amp;quot; does he do this? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.196|173.245.53.196]] 19:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Presumably that's what &amp;quot;one-upping&amp;quot; entails.  We can't see the whole discussion in one frame, so we have to fill in the details.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 02:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The word &amp;quot;apex&amp;quot; was mine, as a replacement for a grammatical slip in a turn of phrase that appeared to mean that.  However, replacing the &amp;quot;standing desk&amp;quot; with the &amp;quot;running desk&amp;quot; at least relegates the former to &amp;quot;non-apex&amp;quot; status, on the assumption that the move was an improvement.  (Not sure if the deer-desk is apex, itself...  How about tied to the back of a velociraptor, Randall?  How much exercise (physical ''and'' mental) would you be getting then! ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:But, anyway, I feel no heartfelt desire to retain that phrasing, if anyone wants to (re-)rewrite it. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.177|141.101.99.177]] 10:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday I ran across this article that summarizes the finding Randall is referring to: http://www.mayoclinic.org/sitting/expert-answers/FAQ-20058005 ''– [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 13:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58978</id>
		<title>Talk:1321: Cold</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58978"/>
				<updated>2014-01-29T23:59:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: re Hkmaly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I really hate when articles on science get a POV tag.  Science isn't politics (hint: evolution and gravity aren't POV either).  Related to the comic, I just had a similar rant on Facebook in the last week or two where I linked to [http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=54 this article] when someone said it was too cold for Global Warming. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 12:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually evolution ''is'' a POV. For a start, it absolutely depends on the non-scientific assumption/philosophy/belief that there is nothing other than the material universe. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.227|108.162.222.227]] 01:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really hate it when people think the global warming scam is science, when it really is nothing more than politics masquerading as science.  The IPCC has been proven to be a bunch of liars, and really there's nothing left but a bunch of whining left-wing lunatics who are desperately clinging to their hope of continuing to use this lie to raise energy prices/taxes. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well you're wrong, and apparently delusionally paranoid about what the political left wants, but the bigger question is why is this in a wiki discussion page? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.117|108.162.249.117]] 13:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, ''you'' are wrong, and still buying into the AGW myth that has been proven false (IPCC and others were basically caught lying).  Why is this in a wiki discussion page?  Well, apparently Randall has decided to use his webcomic as a vehicle to promote a left-wing agenda, so discussion of it here is totally legit. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the most important words there are &amp;quot;his comic&amp;quot;, so it's his call on what he writes. Also, honestly, the idea that climate change is a scam to control energy prices is pretty absurd.[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 13:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I thought it was well-known that Randall was a liberal.  He's made it pretty clear in the past which side of the fence he's on politically.  But that's beside the point, and I agree with 108.162.249.117: You honestly would have to deliberately choose to ignore the whole of the scientific community to believe that the concept of climate change is some sort of political scam.  It really isn't - you can see evidence of it everywhere, if only you were to open your eyes and take a look around you. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it doesn't directly mention it, this is partly related to people's confusion over the difference between 'weather' and 'climate' - the former being what the conditions are at a given moment in time, and the latter referring to long-term trends.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.228|141.101.98.228]] 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the one with whit wolly hat is whitehat [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has cherry picked data for his conclusion and the graph in the comic.  The full history is available from the NWS.  The one for my home town can be found here http://www.erh.noaa.gov/iln/climo/below0.php  The 1970's were unusually cold, which makes the present seem warmer by comparison. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.254|108.162.210.254]] 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently Randall hasn’t seen this:&lt;br /&gt;
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/All_palaeotemps.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To quote Michael Z. Williamson:&lt;br /&gt;
29 years in the last century is not an &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; of the last 300 million years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any finding based on that &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; is complete bullshit. You may as well use 1300-1305 hours on Apr 23 as your &amp;quot;average.&amp;quot; You'll be about as accurate, and save time over actual data collection. {{unsigned ip|173.245.55.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that 0 Fahrenheit / -17 Celsius is ''really fucking cold'' is supported by [[526: Converting to Metric]]. [[User:Fryhole|Fryhole]] ([[User talk:Fryhole|talk]]) 00:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We've been getting some ball-chilling winter with the cold fronts suddenly appearing in Florida, which is a drastic change from the sweaty weather just last week.  I've added &amp;quot;fuckfuckfuckcold&amp;quot; to my personal lexicon. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 04:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that possibly WHITE HAT not CUEBALL (except for the last panel)? {{unsigned ip|108.162.240.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one in black is not black hat.&lt;br /&gt;
He sits around memorising weather data, and lack malice. [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;rcc-acis.org/climatecentral&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source [http://rcc-acis.org/climatecentral rcc-acis.org/climatecentral] provided by Randall doesn't work. What's wrong? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The source quoted on [http://xkcd.com/1321/ xkcd] is no long a URL, but simply &amp;quot;'rcc-acis/climatecentral'&amp;quot; [[User:Boxy|Boxy]] ([[User talk:Boxy|talk]]) 03:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ClimateCentral made some graphs based on rcc-acis data for a few dozen cities.  Here is the link [http://www.climatecentral.org/news/extreme-cold-events-in-a-climate-context-16931#cities In Much of U.S., Extreme Cold is Becoming More Rare][[User:Jamesprescott|Jamesprescott]] ([[User talk:Jamesprescott|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh Dear. I can't believe what I'm reading. Either you guys are being ironic or Randall needs to expand his comic to encompass some of you.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.235|141.101.99.235]] 09:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm really surprised that so many people could love xkcd (apparently) but also hate science. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Despite missing links in evolution tree and missing {{w|Quantum gravity}} theory, we know much more about both that about the climate. Climate politics isn't actually based on science, as scientists failed to produce results fast enough. I would really like to see science result on global warming, but with the amount of money at stake, I don't believe I can. Maybe later. Also, it's a pity that the global warming discussion shadowed REAL ecologic problems. I don't need global warming to see that burning fosil fuels is bad idea. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not quite so fast, there. '''Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing that is true?  I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence.  I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, &amp;quot;I do know one thing -- it ought not to be taught in high school&amp;quot;.'  Dr. Colin Patterson (Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Natural History, London).  Keynote address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, November 5, 1981.'' [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.227|108.162.222.227]] 01:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To those of you who claim climate change is a scam: Have you ever actually looked at any one of the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of science papers, studies, documentaries and photo comparisons done on the polar ice caps and mountain glaciers around the world?  Have you ever looked at the Great Barrier Reef off the east coast of Australia?  Are you even aware that drastic and very sudden changes have happened to these things in just the last 20 years?  (And in the case of the Reef, the two major bleaching events in 1998 and 2002 occurred over just a few DAYS each.)  These are things that existed, mostly unchanged, for thousands of years and are suddenly disappearing or being damaged beyond repair.  The evidence is overwhelming.  I have a really hard time believing that anyone can be faced with such extreme evidence and choose to just plug their ears and go &amp;quot;LA LA LA, LIBERAL LIES&amp;quot; like you morons are doing. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::(To be frank, the people I'm referring to here sound like they came from this comic: http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/258:_Conspiracy_Theories ). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You said it yourself. &amp;quot;Climate change&amp;quot;. I agree that anyone denying the climate is changing is ... how did you said it ... moron. What I'm challenging is the belief that if we tax production of carbon dioxide (or implement some other of plans &amp;quot;against global warming&amp;quot;), the climate will change back. There's nothing scientific on that. Especially considering how low is chance that any taxing would actually lower amount of carbon dioxide produced globally ... usually, it only causes businesses to relocate. Another thing I'm challenging is the &amp;quot;unprecedented&amp;quot; bit often used by global warming proponents. Geologically speaking, climate changes happens often ... and scientists have very little or no data on previous changes. What is few thousands of years in history of Earth? (And in fact, we don't even have data for those thousands of years. We have data for few last hundreds top.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Okay, it wasn't clear earlier that your point was about USING climate-change as a means to scare people into paying taxes, etc.  I saw often-repeated arguments that climate-change ITSELF is a myth and a political football - that there's no proof it's happening.  I can understand questioning political actions taken as a result of the science, but the fact that the climate is changing is undisputable.&lt;br /&gt;
::::As for whether this form of climate change is unusual in the grand scale of time, you're right that we don't have detailed records going back more than a few hundred years, and ecologically speaking, that's not a long time.  But we DO have direct evidence that humans are responsible for a significant portion of the current change, including the incredibly sharp increase in global human population in just the last 100-150 years.  And my point is that there really are people out there who firmly believe the scientific community is smoking crack and promoting some dastardly political agenda, and all the photos and documentation of mass coral bleaching events, glacier and ice-cap melt, species extinctions, etc., are all elaborate hoaxes.  (Just like us landing on the moon, right?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 23:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58850</id>
		<title>Talk:1321: Cold</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58850"/>
				<updated>2014-01-29T01:56:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: Link to relevant comic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I really hate when articles on science get a POV tag.  Science isn't politics (hint: evolution and gravity aren't POV either).  Related to the comic, I just had a similar rant on Facebook in the last week or two where I linked to [http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=54 this article] when someone said it was too cold for Global Warming. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 12:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really hate it when people think the global warming scam is science, when it really is nothing more than politics masquerading as science.  The IPCC has been proven to be a bunch of liars, and really there's nothing left but a bunch of whining left-wing lunatics who are desperately clinging to their hope of continuing to use this lie to raise energy prices/taxes. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well you're wrong, and apparently delusionally paranoid about what the political left wants, but the bigger question is why is this in a wiki discussion page? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.117|108.162.249.117]] 13:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, ''you'' are wrong, and still buying into the AGW myth that has been proven false (IPCC and others were basically caught lying).  Why is this in a wiki discussion page?  Well, apparently Randall has decided to use his webcomic as a vehicle to promote a left-wing agenda, so discussion of it here is totally legit. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the most important words there are &amp;quot;his comic&amp;quot;, so it's his call on what he writes. Also, honestly, the idea that climate change is a scam to control energy prices is pretty absurd.[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 13:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I thought it was well-known that Randall was a liberal.  He's made it pretty clear in the past which side of the fence he's on politically.  But that's beside the point, and I agree with 108.162.249.117: You honestly would have to deliberately choose to ignore the whole of the scientific community to believe that the concept of climate change is some sort of political scam.  It really isn't - you can see evidence of it everywhere, if only you were to open your eyes and take a look around you. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it doesn't directly mention it, this is partly related to people's confusion over the difference between 'weather' and 'climate' - the former being what the conditions are at a given moment in time, and the latter referring to long-term trends.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.228|141.101.98.228]] 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the one with whit wolly hat is whitehat [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has cherry picked data for his conclusion and the graph in the comic.  The full history is available from the NWS.  The one for my home town can be found here http://www.erh.noaa.gov/iln/climo/below0.php  The 1970's were unusually cold, which makes the present seem warmer by comparison. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.254|108.162.210.254]] 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently Randall hasn’t seen this:&lt;br /&gt;
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/All_palaeotemps.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To quote Michael Z. Williamson:&lt;br /&gt;
29 years in the last century is not an &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; of the last 300 million years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any finding based on that &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; is complete bullshit. You may as well use 1300-1305 hours on Apr 23 as your &amp;quot;average.&amp;quot; You'll be about as accurate, and save time over actual data collection. {{unsigned ip|173.245.55.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that 0 Fahrenheit / -17 Celsius is ''really fucking cold'' is supported by [[526: Converting to Metric]]. [[User:Fryhole|Fryhole]] ([[User talk:Fryhole|talk]]) 00:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We've been getting some ball-chilling winter with the cold fronts suddenly appearing in Florida, which is a drastic change from the sweaty weather just last week.  I've added &amp;quot;fuckfuckfuckcold&amp;quot; to my personal lexicon. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 04:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that possibly WHITE HAT not CUEBALL (except for the last panel)? {{unsigned ip|108.162.240.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one in black is not black hat.&lt;br /&gt;
He sits around memorising weather data, and lack malice. [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;rcc-acis.org/climatecentral&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source [http://rcc-acis.org/climatecentral rcc-acis.org/climatecentral] provided by Randall doesn't work. What's wrong? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The source quoted on [http://xkcd.com/1321/ xkcd] is no long a URL, but simply &amp;quot;'rcc-acis/climatecentral'&amp;quot; [[User:Boxy|Boxy]] ([[User talk:Boxy|talk]]) 03:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ClimateCentral made some graphs based on rcc-acis data for a few dozen cities.  Here is the link [http://www.climatecentral.org/news/extreme-cold-events-in-a-climate-context-16931#cities In Much of U.S., Extreme Cold is Becoming More Rare][[User:Jamesprescott|Jamesprescott]] ([[User talk:Jamesprescott|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh Dear. I can't believe what I'm reading. Either you guys are being ironic or Randall needs to expand his comic to encompass some of you.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.235|141.101.99.235]] 09:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm really surprised that so many people could love xkcd (apparently) but also hate science. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Despite missing links in evolution tree and missing {{w|Quantum gravity}} theory, we know much more about both that about the climate. Climate politics isn't actually based on science, as scientists failed to produce results fast enough. I would really like to see science result on global warming, but with the amount of money at stake, I don't believe I can. Maybe later. Also, it's a pity that the global warming discussion shadowed REAL ecologic problems. I don't need global warming to see that burning fosil fuels is bad idea. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To those of you who claim climate change is a scam: Have you ever actually looked at any one of the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of science papers, studies, documentaries and photo comparisons done on the polar ice caps and mountain glaciers around the world?  Have you ever looked at the Great Barrier Reef off the east coast of Australia?  Are you even aware that drastic and very sudden changes have happened to these things in just the last 20 years?  (And in the case of the Reef, the two major bleaching events in 1998 and 2002 occurred over just a few DAYS each.)  These are things that existed, mostly unchanged, for thousands of years and are suddenly disappearing or being damaged beyond repair.  The evidence is overwhelming.  I have a really hard time believing that anyone can be faced with such extreme evidence and choose to just plug their ears and go &amp;quot;LA LA LA, LIBERAL LIES&amp;quot; like you morons are doing. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::(To be frank, the people I'm referring to here sound like they came from this comic: http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/258:_Conspiracy_Theories ). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58847</id>
		<title>Talk:1321: Cold</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58847"/>
				<updated>2014-01-29T01:47:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: re &amp;quot;global warming is a scam&amp;quot; (it's not, take deux)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I really hate when articles on science get a POV tag.  Science isn't politics (hint: evolution and gravity aren't POV either).  Related to the comic, I just had a similar rant on Facebook in the last week or two where I linked to [http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=54 this article] when someone said it was too cold for Global Warming. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 12:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really hate it when people think the global warming scam is science, when it really is nothing more than politics masquerading as science.  The IPCC has been proven to be a bunch of liars, and really there's nothing left but a bunch of whining left-wing lunatics who are desperately clinging to their hope of continuing to use this lie to raise energy prices/taxes. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well you're wrong, and apparently delusionally paranoid about what the political left wants, but the bigger question is why is this in a wiki discussion page? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.117|108.162.249.117]] 13:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, ''you'' are wrong, and still buying into the AGW myth that has been proven false (IPCC and others were basically caught lying).  Why is this in a wiki discussion page?  Well, apparently Randall has decided to use his webcomic as a vehicle to promote a left-wing agenda, so discussion of it here is totally legit. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the most important words there are &amp;quot;his comic&amp;quot;, so it's his call on what he writes. Also, honestly, the idea that climate change is a scam to control energy prices is pretty absurd.[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 13:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I thought it was well-known that Randall was a liberal.  He's made it pretty clear in the past which side of the fence he's on politically.  But that's beside the point, and I agree with 108.162.249.117: You honestly would have to deliberately choose to ignore the whole of the scientific community to believe that the concept of climate change is some sort of political scam.  It really isn't - you can see evidence of it everywhere, if only you were to open your eyes and take a look around you. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it doesn't directly mention it, this is partly related to people's confusion over the difference between 'weather' and 'climate' - the former being what the conditions are at a given moment in time, and the latter referring to long-term trends.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.228|141.101.98.228]] 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the one with whit wolly hat is whitehat [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has cherry picked data for his conclusion and the graph in the comic.  The full history is available from the NWS.  The one for my home town can be found here http://www.erh.noaa.gov/iln/climo/below0.php  The 1970's were unusually cold, which makes the present seem warmer by comparison. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.254|108.162.210.254]] 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently Randall hasn’t seen this:&lt;br /&gt;
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/All_palaeotemps.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To quote Michael Z. Williamson:&lt;br /&gt;
29 years in the last century is not an &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; of the last 300 million years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any finding based on that &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; is complete bullshit. You may as well use 1300-1305 hours on Apr 23 as your &amp;quot;average.&amp;quot; You'll be about as accurate, and save time over actual data collection. {{unsigned ip|173.245.55.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that 0 Fahrenheit / -17 Celsius is ''really fucking cold'' is supported by [[526: Converting to Metric]]. [[User:Fryhole|Fryhole]] ([[User talk:Fryhole|talk]]) 00:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We've been getting some ball-chilling winter with the cold fronts suddenly appearing in Florida, which is a drastic change from the sweaty weather just last week.  I've added &amp;quot;fuckfuckfuckcold&amp;quot; to my personal lexicon. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 04:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that possibly WHITE HAT not CUEBALL (except for the last panel)? {{unsigned ip|108.162.240.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one in black is not black hat.&lt;br /&gt;
He sits around memorising weather data, and lack malice. [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;rcc-acis.org/climatecentral&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source [http://rcc-acis.org/climatecentral rcc-acis.org/climatecentral] provided by Randall doesn't work. What's wrong? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The source quoted on [http://xkcd.com/1321/ xkcd] is no long a URL, but simply &amp;quot;'rcc-acis/climatecentral'&amp;quot; [[User:Boxy|Boxy]] ([[User talk:Boxy|talk]]) 03:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ClimateCentral made some graphs based on rcc-acis data for a few dozen cities.  Here is the link [http://www.climatecentral.org/news/extreme-cold-events-in-a-climate-context-16931#cities In Much of U.S., Extreme Cold is Becoming More Rare][[User:Jamesprescott|Jamesprescott]] ([[User talk:Jamesprescott|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh Dear. I can't believe what I'm reading. Either you guys are being ironic or Randall needs to expand his comic to encompass some of you.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.235|141.101.99.235]] 09:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm really surprised that so many people could love xkcd (apparently) but also hate science. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Despite missing links in evolution tree and missing {{w|Quantum gravity}} theory, we know much more about both that about the climate. Climate politics isn't actually based on science, as scientists failed to produce results fast enough. I would really like to see science result on global warming, but with the amount of money at stake, I don't believe I can. Maybe later. Also, it's a pity that the global warming discussion shadowed REAL ecologic problems. I don't need global warming to see that burning fosil fuels is bad idea. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::To those of you who claim climate change is a scam: Have you ever actually looked at any one of the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of science papers, studies, documentaries and photo comparisons done on the polar ice caps and mountain glaciers around the world?  Have you ever looked at the Great Barrier Reef off the east coast of Australia?  Are you even aware that drastic and very sudden changes have happened to these things in just the last 20 years?  (And in the case of the Reef, the two major bleaching events in 1998 and 2002 occurred over just a few DAYS each.)  These are things that existed, mostly unchanged, for thousands of years and are suddenly disappearing or being damaged beyond repair.  The evidence is overwhelming.  I have a really hard time believing that anyone can be faced with such extreme evidence and choose to just plug their ears and go &amp;quot;LA LA LA, LIBERAL LIES&amp;quot; like you morons are doing. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58846</id>
		<title>Talk:1321: Cold</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1321:_Cold&amp;diff=58846"/>
				<updated>2014-01-29T01:38:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: re &amp;quot;global warming is a scam&amp;quot; (it's not)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I really hate when articles on science get a POV tag.  Science isn't politics (hint: evolution and gravity aren't POV either).  Related to the comic, I just had a similar rant on Facebook in the last week or two where I linked to [http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=54 this article] when someone said it was too cold for Global Warming. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 12:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really hate it when people think the global warming scam is science, when it really is nothing more than politics masquerading as science.  The IPCC has been proven to be a bunch of liars, and really there's nothing left but a bunch of whining left-wing lunatics who are desperately clinging to their hope of continuing to use this lie to raise energy prices/taxes. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 12:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well you're wrong, and apparently delusionally paranoid about what the political left wants, but the bigger question is why is this in a wiki discussion page? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.117|108.162.249.117]] 13:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, ''you'' are wrong, and still buying into the AGW myth that has been proven false (IPCC and others were basically caught lying).  Why is this in a wiki discussion page?  Well, apparently Randall has decided to use his webcomic as a vehicle to promote a left-wing agenda, so discussion of it here is totally legit. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.17|108.162.219.17]] 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think the most important words there are &amp;quot;his comic&amp;quot;, so it's his call on what he writes. Also, honestly, the idea that climate change is a scam to control energy prices is pretty absurd.[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 13:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I thought it was well-known that Randall was a liberal.  He's made it pretty clear in the past which side of the fence he's on politically.  But that's beside the point, and I agree with 108.162.249.117: You honestly would have to deliberately choose to ignore the whole of the scientific community to believe that the concept of climate change is some sort of political scam.  It really isn't - you can see evidence of it everywhere, if only you were to open your eyes and take a look around you. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.120|108.162.246.120]] 01:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it doesn't directly mention it, this is partly related to people's confusion over the difference between 'weather' and 'climate' - the former being what the conditions are at a given moment in time, and the latter referring to long-term trends.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.228|141.101.98.228]] 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the one with whit wolly hat is whitehat [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has cherry picked data for his conclusion and the graph in the comic.  The full history is available from the NWS.  The one for my home town can be found here http://www.erh.noaa.gov/iln/climo/below0.php  The 1970's were unusually cold, which makes the present seem warmer by comparison. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.254|108.162.210.254]] 16:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently Randall hasn’t seen this:&lt;br /&gt;
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/All_palaeotemps.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To quote Michael Z. Williamson:&lt;br /&gt;
29 years in the last century is not an &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; of the last 300 million years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any finding based on that &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; is complete bullshit. You may as well use 1300-1305 hours on Apr 23 as your &amp;quot;average.&amp;quot; You'll be about as accurate, and save time over actual data collection. {{unsigned ip|173.245.55.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that 0 Fahrenheit / -17 Celsius is ''really fucking cold'' is supported by [[526: Converting to Metric]]. [[User:Fryhole|Fryhole]] ([[User talk:Fryhole|talk]]) 00:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We've been getting some ball-chilling winter with the cold fronts suddenly appearing in Florida, which is a drastic change from the sweaty weather just last week.  I've added &amp;quot;fuckfuckfuckcold&amp;quot; to my personal lexicon. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.64|108.162.237.64]] 04:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that possibly WHITE HAT not CUEBALL (except for the last panel)? {{unsigned ip|108.162.240.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one in black is not black hat.&lt;br /&gt;
He sits around memorising weather data, and lack malice. [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone provide an exact URL for (or procedure for finding) the data shown in the upper-right panel? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.71|108.162.221.71]] 18:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;rcc-acis.org/climatecentral&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The source [http://rcc-acis.org/climatecentral rcc-acis.org/climatecentral] provided by Randall doesn't work. What's wrong? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The source quoted on [http://xkcd.com/1321/ xkcd] is no long a URL, but simply &amp;quot;'rcc-acis/climatecentral'&amp;quot; [[User:Boxy|Boxy]] ([[User talk:Boxy|talk]]) 03:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ClimateCentral made some graphs based on rcc-acis data for a few dozen cities.  Here is the link [http://www.climatecentral.org/news/extreme-cold-events-in-a-climate-context-16931#cities In Much of U.S., Extreme Cold is Becoming More Rare][[User:Jamesprescott|Jamesprescott]] ([[User talk:Jamesprescott|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh Dear. I can't believe what I'm reading. Either you guys are being ironic or Randall needs to expand his comic to encompass some of you.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.235|141.101.99.235]] 09:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm really surprised that so many people could love xkcd (apparently) but also hate science. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Despite missing links in evolution tree and missing {{w|Quantum gravity}} theory, we know much more about both that about the climate. Climate politics isn't actually based on science, as scientists failed to produce results fast enough. I would really like to see science result on global warming, but with the amount of money at stake, I don't believe I can. Maybe later. Also, it's a pity that the global warming discussion shadowed REAL ecologic problems. I don't need global warming to see that burning fosil fuels is bad idea. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 01:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1311:_2014&amp;diff=56456</id>
		<title>1311: 2014</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1311:_2014&amp;diff=56456"/>
				<updated>2014-01-03T01:05:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: /* Explanation */ A few grammar tweaks and some significant rewording in WWI/WWII point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1311&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 1, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = 2014.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Some future reader, who may see the term, without knowing the history of it, may imagine that it had reference to some antiquated bridge of the immortal Poet, thrown across the silver Avon, to facilitate his escape after some marauding excursion in a neighbouring park; and in some Gentleman&amp;amp;#39;s Magazine of the next century, it is not impossible, but that future antiquaries may occupy page after page in discussing so interesting a matter. We think it right, therefore, to put it on record in the Oriental Herald that the &amp;amp;#39;Shakesperian Rope Bridges&amp;amp;#39; are of much less classic origin; that Mr Colin Shakespear, who, besides his dignity as Postmaster, now signs himself &amp;amp;#39;Superintendent General of Shakesperian Rope Bridges&amp;amp;#39;, is a person of much less genius than the Bard of Avon. --The Oriental Herald, 1825&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Needs information on how much has come true, also information in general. This is also the longest title text?|1311: 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
The comic includes many predictions from the 1800s and early 1900s. Many of them are for the twenty-first century in general, and only three specifically mention 2014 (two of them as in &amp;quot;a century from now&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It's desirable '''every thing printed should be preserved,''' for we '''cannot now tell how useful it may become''' two centuries hence.&lt;br /&gt;
:A good idea. Now, with Google Books, this can be done in an easier manner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I predict that a century hence the '''Canadian people''' will be '''the noblest specimens of humanity on the face of the earth''' (1863)&lt;br /&gt;
:Notably, there is a common joke nowadays that Canadians are always calm, mellow, polite peoples, even when insulting others.&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the quote goes as follows: all that was good in the Celt, the Saxon, the Gaul and other races, combining to form neither English, Irish, nor Welsh, but Canadians, who would take their place among the churches of Christendom and the nations of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
:This religious prediction probably wasn't believed even by its author. It's only a harangue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the twenty-first century '''mankind will subsist entirely upon jellies.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Concentrates, which are gelatine like, form a large part of our food sources. &lt;br /&gt;
:Absurd&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The twenty-first century baby is destined to be rocked and cradled by electricity, warmed and coddled by electricity, perhaps fathered and mothered by electricity. '''Probably the only thing he will be left to do unaided will be to make love.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably an exaggeration even in its time&lt;br /&gt;
:But, still valid, as many electronics are used in rearing children today. From incubators, warming blankets, walkie-talkies, etc to the tv.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*To-day, in the city of New York, sixty-six different tongues are spoken. '''A century hence, there will probably be only one.''' (1907)&lt;br /&gt;
:False, though the predominant language is still English, and possibly one or two other prominent languages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I often think '''what interesting history we are making for the student of the twenty-first century.''' (William Carey Jones, 1908)&lt;br /&gt;
:''Pending''&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just meta.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*China may be a '''great shoe market''' a decade or a century from now (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
:While it is true in 2013/14, the context behind it was false, as the premise originally was that the business in the western world could export shoes to China, when currently, most of the shoes are actually manufactured in China itself and exported to western world.&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically though, the profits from the shoe selling go to overseas companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''We cannot settle the problem,''' and I venture the prophecy that perhaps '''a century from now this same question may be brought before some future society and discussed very much as it is tonight.''' (1914, on abortion)&lt;br /&gt;
:True - it is still heavily debated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*By the twenty-first century I believe '''we shall all be telepaths.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Absurd, however if we disregard the actual meaning of ''telepath'' there is another point of view.&lt;br /&gt;
:Came true, in a way. Mobile phones allow near-instant communication over voice, text or even the internet. While we do not technically communicate through thought directly, in some way this technology can be considered telepathy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More context for this prediction:&lt;br /&gt;
:‘And it’s my firm belief,’ said Gumbril Senior, adding notes to his epic, ‘that they [the birds] make use of some sort of telepathy, some kind of direct mind-to-mind communication between themselves.  You can’t watch them without coming to that conclusion.’&lt;br /&gt;
:‘A charming conclusion,’ said Mrs Viveash.&lt;br /&gt;
:‘It’s a faculty,’ Gumbril Senior went on, ‘we all possess, I believe.  All we animals.’  [...] ‘Why don’t we use it more? You may well ask.  For the simple reason, my dear young lady, that half our existence is spent dealing with things that have no mind – things with which it is impossible to hold telepathetic communication.  Hence the development of the five senses.  I have eyes that preserve me from running into the lamppost, ears that warn me I’m in the neighbourhood of Niagara.  And having made these instruments very efficient, I use them in holding converse with other beings having a mind.  I let my telepathetic faculty lie idle, preferring to employ an elaborate and cumbrous arrangement of symbols in order to make my thought known to you through your senses.  In certain individuals, however, the faculty is naturally so well-developed – like the musical, or the mathematical, or the chess-playing faculties in other people – that they cannot help entering into direct communication with other minds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The physician of the twenty-first century… may even criticize the language of the times, and may find that '''some of our words have become as offensive to him as the term “lunatic” has become offensive to us.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:True&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Historians of the twenty-first century will look back with well-placed scorn on the '''shallow-minded days''' of the early twentieth century '''when football games and petting parties were considered the most important elements of a college education.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:While media still encourages such images, colleges start to be much more career oriented.  Also, due to incidents involving sex-themed frosh weeks, there was actually a greater emphasis to condemn sexual activities among college students&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''In the year A.D. 2014''' journalists will be writing on the centenary of the great war - '''that is, if there has not been a greater war.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:2014 marks 100 years since the beginning of {{w|World War I}} (popularly called &amp;quot;The Great War&amp;quot; at the time), thus journalists will definitely write articles of this war. More than 9&amp;amp;nbsp;million combatants were killed.  However, unfortunately for the quote's author and for humanity in general, there was a greater war, {{w|World War II}}, which killed around 25 million soldiers and an even greater number of civilians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to a certain British officer, Mr. Colin Shakespeare, who experimented and promoted the use of rope suspension bridges in India, apparently for the ease of colonization and military operations.[http://books.google.com/books?id=aZRPAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA367] The reference to &amp;quot;River Avon&amp;quot; is about the river of Avon in Warwickshire, Stratford upon Avon being the town where Shakespeare (the playwright) was born and where he lived until his early twenties.{{w|River Avon (Warwickshire)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Notes from the past'''&lt;br /&gt;
:It's desirable '''every thing printed should be preserved,''' for we '''cannot now tell how useful it may become''' two centuries hence.&lt;br /&gt;
::Christopher Baldwin&lt;br /&gt;
:::1834&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I predict that a century hence the '''Canadian people''' will be '''the noblest specimens of humanity on the face of the earth'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Rev. John Bredin&lt;br /&gt;
:::1863&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In the twenty-first century '''mankind will subsist entirely upon jellies.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::''The Booklover''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1903&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The twenty-first century baby is destined to be rocked and cradled by electricity, warmed and coddled by electricity, perhaps fathered and mothered by electricity. '''Probably the only thing he will be left to do unaided will be to make love.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Mrs. John Lane, ''The fortnightly''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1905&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To-day, in the city of New York, sixty-six different tongues are spoken. '''A century hence, there will probably be only one.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::''The American Historical Magazine''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1907&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I often think '''what interesting history we are making for the student of the twenty-first century.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Willian Carey Jones&lt;br /&gt;
:::1908&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:China may be a '''great shoe market''' a decade or a century from now.&lt;br /&gt;
::''Boot and Shoe Recorder''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1914&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''We cannot settle the problem,''' and I venture the prophecy that perhaps '''a century from now this same question may be brought before some future society and discussed very much as it is tonight.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Dr. Barton C. Hirst on the subject of '''abortion'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1914&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:By the twenty-first century I believe '''we shall all be telepaths.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Gumbriel, character in ''Antic Hay''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1923&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The physician of the twenty-first century… may even criticize the language of the times, and may find that '''some of our words have become as offensive to him as the term “lunatic” has become offensive to us.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Dr. C. Macae Campbell&lt;br /&gt;
:::1924&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Historians of the twenty-first century will look back with well-placed scorn on the '''shallow-minded days''' of the early twentieth century '''when football games and petting parties were considered the most important elements of a college education.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Mary Eileen Ahern, ''Library Bureau''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1926&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''In the year A.D. 2014''' journalists will be writing on the centenary of the great war - '''that is, if there has not been a greater war.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::F.J.M, ''The Journalist''&lt;br /&gt;
:::1934&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1078:_Knights&amp;diff=52743</id>
		<title>Talk:1078: Knights</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1078:_Knights&amp;diff=52743"/>
				<updated>2013-11-14T03:19:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;At the beginning of a chess game, neither knight can move to e3.  The proper move (and the move actually made, in the picture) is Nf3.  The Nc3 move is correct.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/128.187.97.21|128.187.97.21]] 23:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Indeed, thanks for pointing that out; the move was corrected on xkcd.com, so I did the same here. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 13:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why didn't black move?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1286:_Encryptic&amp;diff=52007</id>
		<title>Talk:1286: Encryptic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1286:_Encryptic&amp;diff=52007"/>
				<updated>2013-11-06T01:42:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.246.120: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The answer to the weathervane sword/ favorite apostle hint has got to be Matthias.  It is 8 characters long, Matthias was the apostle chosen to replace Judas and in the Redwall series Matthias is one of the wielders of the Sword of Martin a sword that was hung on a weathervane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear to me if these are actual hashes from Adobe file? That would be very cool... but actual file seems to have passwords in slightly different format. http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/11/how-an-epic-blunder-by-adobe-could-strengthen-hand-of-password-crackers/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.211|108.162.229.211]] 09:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC) pavel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't call 3DES secure ... but yes, in this situation the real problem is not using per-user salt. Note that I would expect that at least some of those examples would be solvable ...any idea? Hmmm ... sword of weather vane and one of apostles might be Martin ([http://redwall.wikia.com/wiki/Sword_of_Martin]) ... -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's Jonathon (for John). Not sure what it has to do with weather vane swords though... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.240.18|108.162.240.18]] 12:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Umm. &amp;quot;Peter&amp;quot; does not seem to have 8 characters, does it? Encryption method suggests it should be 8 characters, as do 8 character boxes on the right... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.211|108.162.229.211]] 10:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC) pavel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd say &amp;quot;weather vane sword&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;name1&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;favorite of 12 apostles&amp;quot; is (Saint) Peter. &amp;quot;Weather vane&amp;quot; as symbol for the rooster in the denial, and the sword Peter used when Jesus was arrested. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.177|108.162.254.177]] 10:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: ... interesting that google search didn't mentioned it :-) Seems bible have too low pagerank. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The 'favourite' apostle was John the Evangelist though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disciple_whom_Jesus_loved . The other biblical clue here is 'with your own hand you have done all this' - Judith 15:10. If that's Judith1510 then the 'name and shirt number' is 'Judith15'. The TOS/earlobes clue seems to be &amp;quot;Spock's brain&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Spock's (ears?)&amp;quot;. And the Michael Jackson one is (obviously) ABC123. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214|141.101.99.214]] 11:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Perhaps &amp;quot;favorite&amp;quot; in this case refer's to the user's favorite, not Jesus's. [[User:Yomikoma|Yomikoma]] ([[User talk:Yomikoma|talk]]) 16:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The Michael Jackson password should just be &amp;quot;ABC&amp;quot;.  (The other clue refers only to letters, and the proper song title also has only letters.)  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 20:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Given that name1 is two blocks long, I would guess that the apostle's name is going to be eight characters long, with the second hash block being 1+seven spaces (or nulls if Adobe pads it with nulls and not spaces). But then again, as the only disciple with a name eight letters long is Thaddeus maybe not {{unsigned ip|141.101.99.214}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: &amp;quot;St.Peter&amp;quot; is 8 characters, and having a &amp;quot;special&amp;quot; character (the period) makes it a good choice for passwords that might require 1 non-alphanumeric character (and ban spaces). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.223|141.101.99.223]] 11:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I think it is obvious that Name1 refers to {The user's name} + 1. I wonder though if we should be referring to one of the other 12 apostles in a different context? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_Apostles_%28disambiguation%29 - [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.11|108.162.242.11]] 18:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Is the &amp;quot;weathervane sword&amp;quot; referring to Redwall? I haven't read the book myself, but would it be referring to the &amp;quot;Sword of Martin&amp;quot;? [http://redwall.wikia.com/wiki/Sword_of_Martin] --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another article about using passwords hints from multiple users to find the passwords from the breach. http://7habitsofhighlyeffectivehackers.blogspot.com/2013/11/can-someone-be-targeted-using-adobe.html [[User:Bugefun|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun|talk]]) 11:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Sexy earlobes&amp;quot; makes me think of [http://misswiu.livejournal.com/5385.html &amp;quot;The ABC of Aerobics&amp;quot;], but that would make that Shirley Clarke, and nothing in Star Trek has anything to do with Shirley that I am aware of, except possible [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Ruth Shirley Bonne as Ruth]. I skimmed a list of episode titles, but nothing jumps out at me as particularly earlobish. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.187|108.162.219.187]] 11:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sexy earlobes might have something to do with Ferengi, but they didn't appeared in TOS. 141.101.99.214's idea is better. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 11:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, we know that &amp;quot;sexy earlobes&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;best TOS Episode&amp;quot; are the same for the first eight character, but differ after that, while &amp;quot;best TOS&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;sugarland&amp;quot; are the same after the first 8 characters.  So, my guesses are : Best TOS episode: &amp;quot;Charlie X&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Sexy Earlobes&amp;quot;: Someone with the first name of &amp;quot;Charlie&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Sugarland&amp;quot;: some city in Texas (perhaps &amp;quot;HoustonTX&amp;quot;) [[User:JamesCurran|JamesCurran]] ([[User talk:JamesCurran|talk]]) 16:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that you should not ever use cipher in {{w|Block_cipher_mode_of_operation#Electronic_codebook_.28ECB.29|ECB (electronic codebook)}} mode, i.e. encrypt each block separately and independently, but use chaining. --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 12:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: And for passwords you shouldn't be using a cipher at all, but rather a hash function.  (Or a cipher in one of the approved hash constructions, if you must.) And really you shouldn't be using a standard hash function, but be following best practices for passwords instead: salting the hash, using a *slow* hash function, etc. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 20:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hmm, i'm rather confused about the last few on the list though. Assumedly the password for &amp;quot;he did the mash, he did the&amp;quot; would be &amp;quot;monster mash&amp;quot;, but that would leave &amp;quot;purloined&amp;quot; with a password of either &amp;quot;monsterm&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;monster &amp;quot;. which doesn't make much sense. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.240.18|108.162.240.18]] 13:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(charlie sheen) a1f9b2b6299e7a2b eadec1e6ab797397 sexy earlobes - He did a 2 and a half men episode on sexy earlobes&lt;br /&gt;
:(charlie x) a1f9b2b6299e7a2b 617ab0277727ad85 best tos episode - Star Trek has so many good episodes...&lt;br /&gt;
::(houstontx) 39738b7adb0b8af7 617ab0277727ad85 sugarland - Sugarland is in Houston, TX&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about anyone else, but the &amp;quot;hints&amp;quot; column incidentally reminded me of {{w|Darwinian poetry|Darwinian Poetry}}...  Not intentionally, I'm sure. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.214|141.101.98.214]] 14:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somehow I've missed out on this issue until this comic alerted me to it, but: once a few passwords are correctly guessed, does that make it straightforward to recover the encryption key, and then be able to decrypt '''all''' of them? —[[User:Scs|scs]] ([[User talk:Scs|talk]]) 14:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Answering my own question: not really straightforward, no.  3DES is still pretty strong, and what knowing a few passwords gives you is a known-plaintext attack, which helps a little, but is by no means a giveaway. —[[User:Scs|scs]] ([[User talk:Scs|talk]]) 15:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Note that if blackhat used this service, he would know at least one plaintext - his own password--[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 15:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, for calculating the encryption key of Triple DES, there is no real benefit in knowing million passwords, you would still need to brute force it. You would need to know at least 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;32&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; different passwords to make it easier but you can't do that with the leaked file (there are about 30 times less of them and moreover many of them are not unique). [[User:Sten|'''S&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;TEN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''']] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Sten|talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, so the first column is the encrypted password, the second one is the hint chosen by user. What do rectangles mean? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.151|173.245.53.151]] 15:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That are the fields to fill the characters in just as you do in a crossword puzzle. There are small fields at the beginning that take one character each and one large field at the end that takes one to eight characters. [[User:Sten|'''S&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;TEN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''']] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Sten|talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water 3 is an egg group: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Water_3_(Egg_Group) . Given the length of the key, it will probably be 9-16 characters. (Crawdaunt, tentacool, and tentacruel are most likely) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.139|199.27.128.139]] 15:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)	&lt;br /&gt;
:-- which means 9dca1d79d4dec6d5 is either L, EL, or T, but I can't find a way for that to match up with any variation of &amp;quot;monster mash.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.209|173.245.55.209]] 16:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Same problem here... Monster mash must not be correct, but it is one of the easier ones, I can't give up on it. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 17:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe, he did the MASH is about the book, movie or TV Show M*A*S*H instead? --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 17:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Monster Mash was written by Bobby Pickett, maybe it has something to do with him? [[User:Sten|'''S&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;TEN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''']] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Sten|talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe it's not &amp;quot;monster mash&amp;quot; but just &amp;quot;monster&amp;quot;. This would allow the Water-3 Pokemon to be &amp;quot;Cloyster&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.5|108.162.237.5]] 19:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You are having trouble counting to eight. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 20:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You are forgetting the space. Assuming space is stored as a null character, this might actually work.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.29|173.245.54.29]] 01:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Nobody in their right mind would encode spaces as nulls. For us to suppose that they did, we'd need to have some specific clue to that effect. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.5|108.162.238.5]] 09:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to me there are two puzzles here, if folks are right that this is not actual data from the hack.  1) Figure out Adobe's master 3DES encryption password, for the big prize.  2) figure out Randall's 3DES encryption password for this puzzle based on these hints, and knowing it will be something clever.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 16:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trying to decode the passwords (As Randall obviously wants us to)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;with your own hand you have done all this&amp;quot; is from the book of Judith.&lt;br /&gt;
Working on decoding the others. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 17:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8babb6299e06eb6d = password&lt;br /&gt;
a0a2876eb1ea1fea = 1&lt;br /&gt;
85e9da81a8a78adc = 57&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 18:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weather Vane Sword may be a reference to Game of Thrones Ascent. The &amp;quot;Sworn Sword&amp;quot;, I believe is &amp;quot;Rona&amp;quot; which is also a name. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.216|173.245.55.216]] 18:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It needs to be a name of an apostle (as per line 7) and have 7 or 8 characters (as line 3 needs a continuation) so this leaves Matthew, Thaddeus and (Judas) Iscariot. [[User:Sten|'''S&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;TEN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''']] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Sten|talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a password(or 8 character segment) is guessed can it be confirmed? Somebody should take this leaked list and create a website that presents it like in the comment and lets people guess. It can fill in the guessed ones. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.117|108.162.246.117]] 19:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm putting in Mattias for the sword, name1 and disciple because of Saint Matthias [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Matthias] and Redwall Matthias [http://redwall.wikia.com/wiki/Matthias] who held the Weathervane Sword (Also known as the sword of Martin [http://redwall.wikia.com/wiki/The_Sword_of_Martin] ) --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I've also removed &amp;quot;monster mash&amp;quot; from the list as it can't be right. Doesn't match the pokemon or the purloined clues. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on the Water-3 Pokemon hint, the only possibilities of more than 8 characters are tentacool, tentacruel, barbaracle, crawdaunt, carracosta, clauncher, and clawitzer. This would mean &amp;quot;9dca1d79d4dec6d5&amp;quot; would be l, el, le, t, ta, or r. --[[User:Dvorakmd|Dvorakmd]] ([[User talk:Dvorakmd|talk]]) 19:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: This is assuming there are no characters before the actual name of the pokemon. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.209|173.245.55.209]] 20:30, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Assuming Randall has constructed this comic to have a unique answer, it can't end in r because then the clue would be ambiguous (could be clauncher or clawitzer). [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 21:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Some of these can be ruled out; it's very unlikely to be a Generation VI Pokémon (Barbaracle, Clauncher and Clawitzer) as this has only just come out and someone would have had to set up their pasword within the last few weeks. And the Pokémon that are also in the Water-1 group are probably more likely to be thought of as Water-1 than Water-3 (Crawdaunt and Carracosta). This only leaves Tentacool and Tentacruel as longer than 8 letter Water-3 only Pokémon that have been known of for a reasonable length of time; and Tentacool is no one's favourite, as the annoying multitude of them that show up whenever you try to Surf anyway makes them as reviled as Zubats in caves, if not moreso. :P Of course, the password need not be simply the Pokémon's name alone. &amp;quot;SexyShellder&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Cloyster1987&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Misty'sStarmie&amp;quot;... Who knows? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.252|141.101.99.252]] 01:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know the answer to the end either, but here's a list of people who did the Monster Mash, from Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
* Bobby Picket (as Boris Picket)&lt;br /&gt;
* Garpax Records (Gary S. Paxton)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Misfits&lt;br /&gt;
* far, far too many other covers to list&lt;br /&gt;
And here's some synonyms for &amp;quot;purloined&amp;quot;, from thesaurus.com:&lt;br /&gt;
* stole&lt;br /&gt;
* pilfered&lt;br /&gt;
* filched&lt;br /&gt;
* misappropriated&lt;br /&gt;
* embezzled&lt;br /&gt;
* burglarized&lt;br /&gt;
* shoplifted&lt;br /&gt;
* poached&lt;br /&gt;
* pillaged&lt;br /&gt;
* cheated&lt;br /&gt;
* pinched&lt;br /&gt;
* heisted&lt;br /&gt;
* thieved&lt;br /&gt;
* plundered&lt;br /&gt;
* appropriated&lt;br /&gt;
* lifted&lt;br /&gt;
* took&lt;br /&gt;
* snitched&lt;br /&gt;
* defrauded&lt;br /&gt;
* swindled&lt;br /&gt;
* ripped off&lt;br /&gt;
* made off with&lt;br /&gt;
Good luck with these!&lt;br /&gt;
—[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 20:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about Purloined referring to &amp;quot;The Purloined Letter?&amp;quot;  When choosing hints, people, at least in my experience, tend to use word association rather than synonyms. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.209|173.245.55.209]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purloined could also be a reference to the Monster.com hack (http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/monster-trojan). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.11|108.162.237.11]] 21:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Words meaning purloined that can have the listed suffixes could be '''embezzle'''/'''embezzler''' or '''scrounge'''/'''scrounger'''. Not sure if it fits to the mash clue. There was a loan shark character who would acquire things on MASH called Rizzo, it is a stretch though. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.117|108.162.246.117]] 21:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm still trying to figure out how the solutions go into the spaces on the right -- it may be more obvious once the last couple clues are figured out.  I suspect the ordering and numbers of clues have some sort of meaning.  Why are there 5 of the 877... passwords, 2 with no clues?  Why is one of the 4e18.... passwords separated from the rest? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.28|108.162.221.28]] 21:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could Purloined be a reference to the &amp;quot;Purloined Shadows&amp;quot; book in Elder Scrolls? --[[User:Dvorakmd|Dvorakmd]] ([[User talk:Dvorakmd|talk]]) 21:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Or 'The Purloined Payroll', a WoW quest? &amp;quot;Purloined in Petrograd&amp;quot; is also a lyric to a Decemberists song (The Bagman's Gambit).  Google n-grams suggests that &amp;quot;Purloined Image&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;purloined documents&amp;quot; are a Thing. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 21:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purloined could be a reference to something that is known as have been stolen like a work of art, or it could be something that was stolen in an XKCD comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.117|108.162.246.117]] 21:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''EdgarPoe'''(author of The Purloined Letter)/'''EdgarPoet''' fits, but again not really anything to do with MASH. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.117|108.162.246.117]] 21:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water-3 pokemon (egg group) are given here: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Water_3_(Egg_Group) ...if I split off the letters of their names after the 8th letter, we see l, el, le, t, ta, and r. So the MASH item ends with one of those suffixes. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.167|199.27.128.167]] 21:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Can't end in 'r', because then that clue would be ambiguous. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 21:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Speaking of pokemon, could the clue to purloined have something to do with the pokemon Purrloin? http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Purrloin_(Pok%C3%A9mon) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.43|108.162.221.43]] 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a reason &amp;quot;MASH&amp;quot; is capitalized in the above sections?  Given the context, it shouldn't be, and I still haven't given up on the password being a reference to the monster mash.  That said, we can't ignore the movie/show MASH.&lt;br /&gt;
Also, now that I think about it: pokeMONstermash?  I don't know, just throwing ideas out :P [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.209|173.245.55.209]] 22:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On [http://de.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1pvwyf/xkcd_encryptic_analysis_at_the_link_below/ reddit] they suggest &amp;quot;Letterman&amp;quot; (which is wrong, too many letters) based on the M*A*S*H episode, &amp;quot;Letters&amp;quot;. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 22:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...on the other hand, I wonder if an answer like &amp;quot;ALANALDA&amp;quot; would work?  As in, someone who &amp;quot;did the M*A*S*H&amp;quot;... [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 22:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sadly, no.  Because it needs to be more than 8 characters. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 22:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: No, I mean, &amp;quot;an answer of this form&amp;quot;, not ALANALDA exactly.  The Edgar Allan / Alan Alda congruence is tasty, but I can't make it work.  ALLANPOE works as an answer for &amp;quot;Purloined&amp;quot; but that makes something like ALLANPOET the answer to &amp;quot;he did the MASH&amp;quot; (CRAWDAUNT is then the pokemon).  But that's misspelling Alda's name for the MASH clue, doesn't quite work.  There's also JAMIEFARR (Cpl Klinger) as a better answer to &amp;quot;he did the MASH&amp;quot; but then that makes JAMIEFAR the answer to &amp;quot;purloined&amp;quot; and I can't plausibly make that work.  ALLANARBUS is another M*A*S*H actor, but that doesn't work at all.  Can anyone come up with other/better ideas in this vein? [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 22:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Don't misspell Alda's name; misspell Poe's! —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 02:07, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In crossword puzzles, a clue ending in -ed (like 'purloined') is most commonly a hint that the answer ends in 'ed'. Cross referencing that with the Pokemon clue, the solution for &amp;quot;he did the MASH&amp;quot; becomes a nine or ten letter answer ending in:  -edl, -edel, -edle, -edt, or -edta (excluding -edr due to non-uniqueness), with ......edle looking the most &amp;quot;English-y&amp;quot; to me. My hunch would be something else Robert Altman or Alan Alda &amp;quot;did&amp;quot;... but nothing seems to end in 'edle.' --[[User:Willowy burrito|Willowy burrito]] ([[User talk:Willowy burrito|talk]]) 23:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: There is no indication that this is a standard crossword. Most users don't respect crossword conventions when writing password hints. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 23:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Aside from the title. And the text. And the fact these didn't come from users, but were just chosen for a puzzle designed by Randall, who would include just this sort of puzzler hint/in-joke in a comic about puzzles. It's moot, because no synonyms for 'stolen' make any sense with a couple other letters tacked on the end. But still, there've been worse hunches. --[[User:Willowy burrito|Willowy burrito]] ([[User talk:Willowy burrito|talk]]) 00:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For all we know, his favourite Water-3 Pokémon could be Shell Smash Cloyster or Shell Smash Omastar - &amp;quot;OmastarSmash&amp;quot; as a password would fit in with &amp;quot;Monster mash&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.252|141.101.99.252]] 23:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I like that idea, although it leaves &amp;quot;Monster &amp;quot; (with a trailing space) as the answer to &amp;quot;Purloined&amp;quot;, which makes no sense.  But interesting idea. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 00:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MonsterMash&lt;br /&gt;
MonsterM&lt;br /&gt;
TheWiscash {{unsigned|Jcupcake}}&lt;br /&gt;
: It's &amp;quot;Whiscash&amp;quot;, and it's Water 2 (not 3) and &amp;quot;MonsterM&amp;quot; makes no sense as an answer for the hint &amp;quot;Purloined&amp;quot;.  But I like the idea of adding &amp;quot;The&amp;quot; in front of the pokemon answer; perhaps we're being too restrictive by looking only at pokemon with length &amp;gt; 8. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 23:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, sorry about the typo - last one would be TheWhiscash. MonsterM absolutely makes sense. http://www.hoax-slayer.com/monster-666.shtml The purloined letter here IS M [[User:Jcupcake|Jcupcake]] ([[User talk:Jcupcake|talk]]) 02:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So somewhere above this someone pointed out that purloined could refer to a monster.com hack...in which case, could the first two passwords be &amp;quot;monster mash&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;monster&amp;quot;?  That would allow for another previous suggestion of &amp;quot;OmastarSmash&amp;quot;  Also, here's my IP Address and a remarkably not-random timestamp: [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.195|108.162.219.195]] 01:31, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could also be that there are modifiers to the base. I always thought of Monster Mash as MonstaMash. This would line up closely with My Corphish written as &amp;quot;mycorphish&amp;quot; My favorite pokemon is my pikachu not just any pikachu, but mine, sort of logic. [[User:Bitassassin|Bitassassin]] ([[User talk:Bitassassin|talk]]) 01:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could &amp;quot;he did the mash&amp;quot; be referring to brewing and/or the Maillard reaction? [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 05:32, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was just thinking that &amp;quot;MonsterM Ash&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;MonsterM&amp;quot;, both seem to make sense, and Ash had a few water pokemon in the water 3 egg group, so could it potentially be something along the lines of &amp;quot;Corphish Ash&amp;quot;? That was the only 8 letter water 3 pokemon he had and it fits with the other clues [[User:NewToThis|NewToThis]] ([[User talk:NewToThis|talk]]) 07:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the idea of pokemon fusion been considered? http://pokemon.alexonsager.net/ referenced by http://kotaku.com/how-the-website-that-lets-you-create-frankenstein-pokem-510517336&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Oukansz|Oukansz]] ([[User talk:Oukansz|talk]]) 19:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Fanservice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall must know about this site. This comic doesn't work without people to crack the code. Should we have a fanservice category? :-) --[[User:SurturZ|SurturZ]] ([[User talk:SurturZ|talk]]) 23:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm beginning to suspect that the wide boxes will have the key in it.  Assuming he used regular DES (or DES3, for that matter, but using the same 8-byte key 3 times), it could be plausible.  The 5 in the middle could be 'abcde', a lot of the other 'second halves' are numbers, and the likely known one that's not seems to be an 'x' -- which could certainly be involved in writing a hex number... problem is there's 11 of those boxes.  Trying to guess what signficance the positioning of those boxes have. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.28|108.162.221.28]] 00:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it looks like the boxes line up perfectly such that the wide bits (for second-half) will only touch the words they apply to.  Order will be more or less what they are (I see the wide boxes as, in order, 1, 57, 10, Sheen, and X, with the 8 char boxes as Matthias, Password, Judith15, Charlie, and HoustonT).  The next 5 are odd -- I'm not sure if we repeat the alpha/obvious password 5 times, or it's 5 chars long (abcde) and one per box.  The last set is still under discussion, of course. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.28|108.162.221.28]] 00:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;MASH capitalized&lt;br /&gt;
I'm currently chasing down the idea that MASH refers to [[Wikipedia:MASH-1]].  Haven't seen any name yet that looks like it might satisfy &amp;quot;Purloined&amp;quot;. - [[User:BozoTheScary|BozoTheScary]] ([[User talk:BozoTheScary|talk]]) 01:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think MASH is a transcribing error. The comic doesn't have any difference on those letters as far as I can tell. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.222|173.245.50.222]] 03:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Purloined Letter is a Edgar Alan Poe story starring C. Auguste Dupin. Might help. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.5|108.162.249.5]] 03:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also a strong association between the Monster Mash and the Mashed Potato, just throwing another idea into the ring. Also try the name BobbyPickett. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.5|108.162.249.5]] 03:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frankenstein did the Monster Mash in the cartoon for the song. That leads to a Pokemon card ending in 'tein' and 'frankens' for the hint Purloined. I could not find a Pokemon card that ended in 'tein' nor could I link 'frankens' with Purloined. I ran 'frankens' through Google Translate but found nothing. Also, it's the same password for the &amp;quot;monster mash&amp;quot; hint and the entry with no password hint so I think it's an obvious password (something someone can recall without a hint). Frankenstein fits that part but not the other ones. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.222|173.245.50.222]] 03:35, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My $0.02: &amp;quot;He did the mash...&amp;quot; might allude to the expression &amp;quot;doing the math&amp;quot; only (intentionally) misspelled and something like &amp;quot;numbert&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;numb&amp;quot; could be the answer. --[[User:RagnarDa|RagnarDa]] ([[User talk:RagnarDa|talk]]) 04:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
graveyard smash fits for the first clue (though lyrically incorrect). Gives smash as second block, but cannot find association between graveyard and purloined. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.5|108.162.249.5]] 04:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we take The Monster Mash for the first answer, it could be written as TheMonsterMash or The Monster Mash, giving either TheMonst erMash or The Mons ter Mash as the two blocks. This gives either Themonst or The Mons as Purloined and either ermash or ter Mash for second block of pokemon answer. Suggestions? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.5|108.162.249.5]] 04:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Only problem is that the word &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; is the last word of the hint.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.117|108.162.237.117]] 04:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that the water-3 group is not the same, but it seems like an odd coincidence that another pokemon group is the &amp;quot;monster&amp;quot; group. --[[User:Natnee|Natnee]] ([[User talk:Natnee|talk]]) 04:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a Scooby Doo comic book story titled &amp;quot;[The Purloined Poe-M](http://scoobydoo.wikia.com/wiki/The_Purloined_Poe-M)&amp;quot;, which has an odd similarity to the &amp;quot;MonsterM&amp;quot; possible password.  This would leave the pokemon password ending &amp;quot;ash&amp;quot; who, of course, is a pokemon character ... which makes no sense in that place. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.83|199.27.128.83]] 05:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's one that fits:  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
facemash4077   (Combination of facemash by zuckerberg and M*A*S*H) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
facemash       (Site made by Zuck in The Social network.) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe facmashklinger.. The eggklinger being a water-3 Pokemon?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.39|108.162.215.39]] 06:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Working Backwards&lt;br /&gt;
I'm attempting to take a different tact, by trying to find the key itself.  I'm assuming its something easy to guess.  I've tried the top 100 Adobe passwords (you can get them [http://stricture-group.com/files/adobe-top100.txt here]) using the following bash script (testing the word &amp;quot;matthias&amp;quot;, as this one seems pretty certain):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
while read p; do echo -n $p\: &amp;amp;&amp;amp; echo -n &amp;quot;matthias&amp;quot; | openssl enc -e -des-ede3 -nosalt -nopad -pass pass:$p | xxd -p; done &amp;lt; passwords.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this to work, I pre-processed the top 100 passwords file with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
cat adobe-top100.txt | cut -c51- &amp;gt; passwords.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
…and then trimmed the cruft with a text editor (leading text paragraph and table headers).  So far no luck; perhaps someone with more time on their hands can try some obvious XKCD-related passwords (I've tried XKCD, xkcd, xkcd.com, randall, rmunroe, encryptic, and Encrytic) and see if the encrypted version(s) match up with what we have here. [[User:Yaztromo|Yaztromo]] ([[User talk:Yaztromo|talk]]) 09:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I should mention that I've also tried OpenSSL's des-ede mode and des-ecb, as Im not sure if Randall used one, two, or three key mode.  I'm also assuming the key has been generated from the password using OpenSSL's default key generation method, any of with I suppose could be incorrect. [[User:Yaztromo|Yaztromo]] ([[User talk:Yaztromo|talk]]) 09:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Nice work.  Note that the puzzle is very specific about using &amp;quot;block mode 3-DES&amp;quot; (usually called &amp;quot;ECB&amp;quot;).  DES keys are actually 56 bits; each of the 8 bytes has odd parity (the number of 1 bits is odd).  From [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Encryption_Standard wp], &amp;quot;Bits 8, 16,..., 64 are for use in ensuring that each byte is of odd parity.&amp;quot;  As a wild guess, I'd suggest that, if Randall chose a readable 8-ASCII-character passphrase, he also selected only characters that would make the parity bit zero (so that the result was ASCII).  That is, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[ #%&amp;amp;)*,/12478;=&amp;gt;@CEFIJLOQRTWX[]^abdghkmnpsuvyz|]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 16:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Uh, hold one.  Read the &amp;quot;Explanation&amp;quot; section above.  It's clear that the hashes are not real, so brute-forcing the key isn't going to work. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 16:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Just to note, there are actually three options for keys in TripleDES:  having three independent keys (K1, K2, K3), having two independent keys (K1, K2, K1), or using a single key (K1, K1, K1).  When run in ECB mode, OpenSSL calls these '''des-ede3''' and '''des-ede''' for options 1 and 2 (option 3 is for backwards compatibility with DES, and can be run using just '''des-ecb''').  See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_DES#Keying_options Triple DES - Keying Options] for details.  In addition, the password and the key are two different entities -- typically the password is run through a keying algorithm first (commonly [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBKDF2 PBKDF2] for 3DES), so there is no need to select password characters based on parity patterns.  All of which is moot now that we know that the data isn't in fact TripleDES encrypted in the first place.  I'm actually disappointed in Randall now :P. [[User:Yaztromo|Yaztromo]] ([[User talk:Yaztromo|talk]]) 19:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I Hadn't seen it mentioned yet, but Monster Mash was written by Robert George Pickett (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Pickett), Whose last name goes closely with the second clue, Purloined, which means &amp;quot;stolen&amp;quot;.  I can't make it work, but I figured it was worth pointing out. (Nov 5th 1:26 pm utc ) [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.24|173.245.56.24]] 13:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's a good connection.  Maybe we should reorganize the discussion and start a list of &amp;quot;interesting ideas we can't quite make work&amp;quot; in the hopes that someone else has an insight.  Edgar Allan / Alan Alda, Pickett / &amp;quot;Pick it&amp;quot;, Klinger / Kingler, etc.  Most of these are just manifestation of the human brain's ability to find patterns even in random coincidence, of course, but one of them might be on the right track. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 16:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just quick thoughts. &lt;br /&gt;
I feel like Cpl klinger and the water type kingler is too solid a connection to ignore even though I can't really use it. &lt;br /&gt;
Kingler was owned in the series by Ash. &lt;br /&gt;
Ash is a three letter word and the last three letters of the phrase monstermash. &lt;br /&gt;
Monsterm=8 letters so the first block  ash=3 letters in the second block. &lt;br /&gt;
Monsterm is about the monster.com thing, therefore purloined. It's a double reference, the .co has been purloined from the purloined website. &lt;br /&gt;
Then blastoise -3, or rather blastois3 - 3 (mocking the common password meme of replacing letters with numbers) &lt;br /&gt;
So the last password, which is super hard to guess and well chosen even with the clue is, blastoisash?   It's a feasibly memorable password that would not be quickly forgotten by a pokemon fan while still being hard to guess. &lt;br /&gt;
Can you think of a way to check it? Maybe go into the old command line xkcd and try it as a password? (From a contributor to my talk page) --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 13:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That's really a stretch. &amp;quot;.co is purloined from monster.com?&amp;quot; really? The answer will be far more obviously correct... once we figure it out.  Look at the other answers, for example. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 16:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;another quick idea for monster mash&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be deflection. Maybe whoever put it in was paranoid. Or just dumb. Or who knows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, there is a pokemon that's in the monster/water(-1) hybrid group called Marshtomp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monster mash, mashed (ie anagrammed) can give us all but the P out of that... which is fine, as it's a 9-letter name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus we have E, N and S left over (and indeed a further T, H, E), which could become overall, e.g, Marshtomens (...Marshtomethens? Or w/e), which you can split up as you like to represent something which has been stolen (personally). Possibly in german slang or something. It doesn't have to be a direct thesaurus link, it could well be complete misdirection (on Randall's behalf, or that of his notional Adobe user), same as for the pokemon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for the pokemon itself, it could well be &amp;quot;Marshtomp3&amp;quot; ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, don't forget about reversed words and so-on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, I've used very personal and/or random things (like, maybe two or three people in the world may recognise it in connection with me, and it's not online, at least not anywhere it can be found - basically it's just in my head and dies with me), reversed, with numbers substituting random characters, as passwords before. That covers each individual base in just one PW...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we just have to start feeding the guesses into a hash engine and try to figure out, maybe brute force, what the original key was. Knowing almost all of the other answers already makes this far, far easier for those who may have the facility to run the tests already. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.213|141.101.99.213]] 14:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: This is not a real excerpt from the password file, this is a puzzle which Randall made up.  Therefore, the answer to the last group will not be random, and it will not be a stretch.  It will be obvious (as obvious as the previous ones)... once we figure out the catch. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 16:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FWIW, Eve Online also features a &amp;quot;Purloined Sansha Codebreaker&amp;quot;. [[User:Cscott|Cscott]] ([[User talk:Cscott|talk]]) 17:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree that the solution has to be obvious - especially after its revealed.  If this were a crossword puzzle, then the clues like Purloined might be followed by a question mark.  Purloined?  a cat that is loined - a cat that is covered with cloths?  Puss in boots?  Or something along those lines... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.34|108.162.215.34]]rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
purloined=phished (Corphish)? {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.227}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i wonder if the link between  the last three clues is more like a cryptic crossword puzzle---for instance, --purloined= heisted; the other clues reading it as he/is/ted...?--[[User:Wwd|Wwd]] ([[User talk:Wwd|talk]]) 22:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the pokemon could be the name of an ubuntu release, per &amp;quot;Not Really Into Pokemon&amp;quot; at http://xkcd.com/178/ --[[User:Willowy burrito|Willowy burrito]] ([[User talk:Willowy burrito|talk]]) 22:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could also abbreviate Robert Pickett's name (the co-writer of Monster Mash) as &amp;quot;Rob Pickett&amp;quot; which goes even more with purloined (the first 8 letters are now &amp;quot;Rob Pick&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Capitalization hints?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no idea who first put the capital letters in &amp;quot;MASH&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Purloined&amp;quot; in the transcript (and I don't want to check), but now that I've gotten rid of the second (after somebody else got rid of the first), I want to record them here for the record.  Possibly Randall put them in and was feeding us clues (so ''MASH'' the book or movie, and ''Purloined'' a title such as Poe's).  I consider this unlikely (after all, I removed one of these capitalizations), but the possibility should be recorded.  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 01:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't be a coincidence that this comes up as the top google news search for 'purloined:' http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/05/adobe_users_purloined_passwords_were_pathetic/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.246.120</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>