<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.159.135</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.159.135"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/162.158.159.135"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T05:25:02Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3075:_Anachronym_Challenge&amp;diff=372970</id>
		<title>Talk:3075: Anachronym Challenge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3075:_Anachronym_Challenge&amp;diff=372970"/>
				<updated>2025-04-14T21:36:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.159.135: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't &amp;quot;Anachronym&amp;quot; be &amp;quot;Anachronism&amp;quot;? The listed items aren't archaic acronyms. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.83|162.158.63.83]] 17:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, &amp;quot;-nym&amp;quot; means name, so this is names that are outdated [[Special:Contributions/104.23.190.60|104.23.190.60]] 17:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: (The OP) Ah, I see now. An anachronym is a term used in an anachronistic way (like tin foil which isn't made of tin anymore), where an anacronym is an word that started as an acronym but is now treated as a word (people no longer think of it as an acronym). Neither term being in common parlance, and being only one letter different, my search for a definition got them confused.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.35.94|172.70.35.94]] 00:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure why he should be paying with paper money. He can easily pay by credit card ... using virtual debit card on his phone. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 17:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Paper money might not be made from paper anymore - at least, it isn't in NZ, where I live. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.0.130|172.69.0.130]] 17:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think “paper money” is about paper no longer being made from papyrus. US bank notes are printed on rag paper, which is indeed a kind of paper despite containing little or no wood pulp.--[[User:Seakingsoyuz|Seakingsoyuz]] ([[User talk:Seakingsoyuz|talk]]) 18:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Rag paper is not just &amp;quot;a kind of paper&amp;quot;, it's the original kind of paper (papyrus is not paper in any usual sense, because it is not made from pulped fibers). When paper was invented in China, it was made from rag fibers, and it was still made like that when it was first produced in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't think 'paper money' should be designated as being made of paper here. Everyone knows that paper money doesn't feel or act like paper. It's incredibly hard to rip. [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 18:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Being Canadian, I thought the reference here was to what's described at Wikipedia as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_banknote Polymer banknotes]. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.127.25|162.158.127.25]] 18:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;card&amp;quot; in credit card seems to come from Latin and Greek for a piece of paper or papyrus.  So a credit card, now made of plastic, metal, semiconductors, etc. might be considered an anachronym.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.41.95|162.158.41.95]] 19:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think anybody's made sense of or convincingly explained the title text. Paper money actually is basically made of paper. Maybe that's the joke and why it's in the title text. Is there anywhere teaching that paper money isn't made of paper? Maybe it used to be made of the same paper we use for writing on, like IOUs. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.93|162.158.158.93]] 21:23, 14 April 2025 (UTC) I think I figured it out. The article focuses heavily on actual production, but Randall doesn't mean that the original products no longer exist, he means that they aren't what stores are selling. Thinking on this I realized that paper money is like that too -- it's no longer backed by gold or silver. I added a sentence to the article to say this using the concept &amp;quot;fake&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;imitation porcelain&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.135|162.158.159.135]] 21:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adults who &amp;quot;enjoy&amp;quot; rubber ducks include programmers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging [[Special:Contributions/172.71.95.27|172.71.95.27]] 18:40, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word money came from words that meant coin.  The word coin evidently came from wedge shaped.  Not quite anachronym, though somewhat anachronism.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.41.95|162.158.41.95]] 19:11, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surprised &amp;quot;lead pencil&amp;quot; didn't make the list [[Special:Contributions/172.68.12.109|172.68.12.109]] 19:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite the same category. The core of wooden pencils never contained lead, that was always a misnomer by people who didn't know it was actually carbon. [[User:ChaoticNeutralCzech|ChaoticNeutralCzech]] ([[User talk:ChaoticNeutralCzech|talk]]) 08:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I thought soft metals like lead did work for writing with though, functioning similarly to the graphite in a pencil but possibly needing a rougher surface like chalk does. I'm surprised the name isn't from actual use as I had informally learned it was. I think I tested it by writing with lead solder. In ancient Rome people would write on rougher slate, not sure what they used to write on the slate with though. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.36|162.158.159.36]] 21:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duck Tape is no longer made from ducks! [[User:IIVQ|IIVQ]] ([[User talk:IIVQ|talk]]) 19:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It Actually got its name from being made from &amp;quot;duck fabric,&amp;quot; a kind of heavy very tightly woven cotton fabric.  Then there was confusion by a brand putting a picture of a duck on the label, and people using it to join segments of heating ducts together, making people falsely think it was originally called &amp;quot;duct tape,&amp;quot; with duck being a fanciful brand name.  Originally though it was developed for the military in WW1 to seal ammunition boxes in a waterproof way, but due to widespread improvised uses by soldiers, post war they decided to market it to civilians.--[[Special:Contributions/172.71.255.102|172.71.255.102]] 17:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::What your thinking about is &amp;quot;fabric tape&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;gaffer's tape&amp;quot;. What people call &amp;quot;duck tape&amp;quot; is actually called &amp;quot;duct tape,&amp;quot; as in the tape you would use on air ducting. Many people misheard and dropped the final &amp;quot;t&amp;quot;, and of course the Duck brand didn't help. --[[User:Mblumber|Mblumber]] ([[User talk:Mblumber|talk]]) 21:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;digital money&amp;quot; shouldn't be listed as what &amp;quot;paper money&amp;quot; is actually made out of. Nobody would say &amp;quot;I'm paying with paper money&amp;quot; if they are paying with some digital currency. The anachronism is &amp;quot;paper money&amp;quot; being actually made of linen or whatever hi-tech fibers. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.254.211|172.70.254.211]] 19:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC) anonymous user&lt;br /&gt;
:Not even ''fibers''. Sheet-polymers (with loads of complex embedded and pressed-in features) are becoming the new go-to for banknotes, in a number of countries. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.135|172.68.205.135]] 23:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My wife suggests that this is much easier if you are tech shopping: Apple, Mouse, Spam, Phish, Cookies.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.225|162.158.78.225]] 20:03, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Click mouse to accept cookie&amp;quot; meme - featuring rodent and confection. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/06/e6/7d/06e67d6ee5a2afa112bf548463e97125.jpg [[Special:Contributions/172.70.35.94|172.70.35.94]] 00:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's not in the same category since computer mice were never ''made of'' actual mice. Anyway, I'm sure there are some examples in tech: '''compressed air''' (gas duster) cans do not actually contain nitrogen or oxygen but a mixture of hydrocarbon gases that can be liquified at pressures obtainable in a cheap can to drastically increase the volume ratio, but I can imagine people might have used actual pressurized air containers for dusting at some point (though likely not commercially). [[User:ChaoticNeutralCzech|ChaoticNeutralCzech]] ([[User talk:ChaoticNeutralCzech|talk]]) 08:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure why &amp;quot;sidewalk chalk&amp;quot; on there and who decides that calcium carbonate is allowed to be called chalk, but calcium sulphate is not. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.196|108.162.216.196]] 05:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I came here wondering why it was on the list, but for a different reason: It's never been made from sidewalks. Yes, I actually needed to read the list to clear up the misconception. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.127.25|162.158.127.25]] 18:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because, other than the use we give it as &amp;quot;thing you write on blackboards with&amp;quot;, chalk is originally a stone made of relatively loose calciulm carbonate (limestone mostly made from foraminifers), which is what was used to write on slate blackboards before we started making them out of pressed gypsum. --[[Special:Contributions/172.64.238.130|172.64.238.130]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can still buy solid cast-iron irons. Although I doubt anyone actually uses them for smoothing clothes, more for decoration. [[User:SDSpivey|SDSpivey]] ([[User talk:SDSpivey|talk]]) 16:23, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: If you can still buy _new_ ones update the article! People likely use the old ones in traditional communities though. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.36|162.158.159.36]] 21:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Steel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Stainless steel}} ''does'' contain Fe, so &amp;quot;iron&amp;quot; ain't ''that'' &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.35.95|172.70.35.95]] 05:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We have long made a distinction between &amp;quot;iron&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;steel&amp;quot;, not to mention that, while stainless steel has about 1% carbon by weight (give or take: sometime more, sometimes less), since carbon is over 4 times lighter than iron, that makes about 4% (and up to 10%) of the atoms carbon, not to mention that, to be stainless, it has to either have a by weight composition of either over 10% chromium or over 8% nickel, which are almost the same weight as iron (a difference of around 5%, lower for chromium, higher for nickel). Given that the average stainless steel has a 18% by weight of chromium, adding that with the carbon means that only 3 out of 4 atoms are iron, and if you have copper and tin or copper and tin in that same ratio, it would long have surpassed the line to be called &amp;quot;bronze&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;brass&amp;quot;, respectively. &amp;quot;Having iron atoms&amp;quot; is not the same as &amp;quot;made of iron&amp;quot;, mainly when it originally was indeed made out of (wrought) iron. --[[Special:Contributions/188.114.111.245|188.114.111.245]]&lt;br /&gt;
::99% is a way higher percentage than say, the amount of nickel in nickels ($0.05 coins): 25% ({{w|Nickel (United States coin)|US}}) or 2% ({{w|Nickel (Canadian coin)|Canadian}}). The latter might qualify for this list because it actually used to be made of near-pure nickel, while the US coin's composition never changed since the first (1866) version that became known as the &amp;quot;nickel&amp;quot;. [[User:ChaoticNeutralCzech|ChaoticNeutralCzech]] ([[User talk:ChaoticNeutralCzech|talk]]) 11:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steel (stainless or otherwise) does not occur naturally. It has to be made. By humans. Out of iron. So in this case 'having iron atoms' DOES mean 'made of (as a synonym of 'from') iron'. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.129|172.70.86.129]] 04:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Bronze contains mostly copper. So I assume you would call it copper, too. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.130.67|162.158.130.67]] 11:15, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Cutlery&amp;quot; specifically refers to metallic implements with a cutting edge. Knives, scissors, and swords are cutlery; Spoons and forks are not cutlery. Table knives, forks, and spoons, collectively are &amp;quot;flatware&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.164.155|162.158.164.155]] 10:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was really hoping to re-edit that element, anyway. The comic says &amp;quot;silverware&amp;quot; which can relate to cutlery/other food-implements or to the plates or candlesticks or even ''trophies''. Someone assumed that meant cutlery(+dining implements in general). As well as other improvable writing about the assumption they went with. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.58.49|172.70.58.49]] 22:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I assume the confusion comes from the respecive British and American terms for a collection of forks, knives, and spoons. British English calls these things &amp;quot;cutlery&amp;quot; even if they don't have a cutting edge. American English commonly refers to these as &amp;quot;silverware,&amp;quot; especially when made with stainless steel, although I have also heard the term &amp;quot;plastic silverware&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;wooden silverware&amp;quot; when &amp;quot;flatware&amp;quot; would probably have been a more accurate generic term.   [[Special:Contributions/172.70.163.35|172.70.163.35]] 18:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC) (an American expat)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paper ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just want to point out that paper made from cotton fibers instead of wood pulp ''is still paper''. You can buy it in the store. There are non-paper banknotes now, but not in the U.S., and I'd be surprised if polymer banknotes were ever called &amp;quot;paper money&amp;quot;.  [[User:LtPowers|LtPowers]] ([[User talk:LtPowers|talk]]) 12:35, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Be surprised. That's what they're usually called in Canada. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.127.164|162.158.127.164]] 18:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::And anywhere with polymer bills. &amp;quot;Paper money&amp;quot; =  bills. Still, it's true that cotton-linen paper is still paper, so is hemp paper and any other paper made from cellulose fibers (paper can be categorized by cellulose source, average fiber length, thickness, impurities and papermaking method). You can even make paper out of old clothes made from vegetable textiles (like blue jeans, cotton T-shirts or hemp pants). As a weird side note, there are non-cellulose papers, like silk paper, but they are made in the same way as regular paper (which is not how plymer bills are made, to my understanding)--[[Special:Contributions/188.114.111.245|188.114.111.245]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, I've always heard of it as &amp;quot;paper money&amp;quot; --[[User:Xnerkcd|&amp;amp;#60;b&amp;amp;#62;&amp;amp;#60;i&amp;amp;#62;xnerkcd&amp;amp;#60;/b&amp;amp;#62;&amp;amp;#60;/i&amp;amp;#62;]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd|talk]]) 07:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== silverware made of silver ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I typed started typing &amp;quot;silverware made&amp;quot; into Google, it suggested &amp;quot;silverware real silver&amp;quot;, which brought up a very ad-heavy results page.  A few of them were re-selling vintage silverware, but most seemed to be offering &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; designs.  I had to scroll down several pages before I found stuff that looked even like a catalog, rather than an ad for one particular possible purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But since it seems like a competitive market, and I wasn't patient enough to look for an informational marketing page, I don't feel comfortable picking one (or several) particular ads as the citation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps someone else does.  Or perhaps a screenshot archived somewhere.  [[User:JimJJewett|JimJJewett]] ([[User talk:JimJJewett|talk]]) 18:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since when are ads considered reliable sources? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.159.135</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1315:_Questions_for_God&amp;diff=367087</id>
		<title>1315: Questions for God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1315:_Questions_for_God&amp;diff=367087"/>
				<updated>2025-02-26T23:20:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.159.135: /* Explanation */ Added alternative explanation for the Shadow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1315&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 10, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Questions for God&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = questions_for_god.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = What sins could possibly darken the heart of a STEAMBOAT? I asked The Shadow, but he says he only covers men.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] is paraphrasing a famous quote from the British {{w|applied mathematician}}, and fellow of the {{w|Royal Society}}, {{w|Horace Lamb}}, who famously {{w|Horace Lamb#Later years, 1920–1934|stated in 1932}}:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|I am an old man now, and when I die and go to heaven there are two matters on which I hope for enlightenment. One is {{w|quantum electrodynamics}}, and the other is the {{w|Turbulence|turbulent motion of fluids}}. And about the former I am rather optimistic.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was referring to two phenomena in physics that, at the time, were poorly understood and difficult to explain. Lamb proved to be correct in his prediction that quantum electrodynamics (QED) was easier to explain; nowadays we have a much clearer understanding of QED, while our understanding of turbulence has improved little. {{w|Richard Feynman}}, who was himself largely responsible for explaining QED, famously described turbulence as &amp;quot;the most important unsolved problem of classical physics&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]], in response, indicates that if he were to gain divine elucidation his question would relate to the widespread schoolyard rhyme &amp;quot;{{w|Miss Susie}}&amp;quot;, which typically begins with the stanza:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Miss Susie had a steamboat&lt;br /&gt;
:The steamboat had a bell&lt;br /&gt;
:Miss Susie went to heaven&lt;br /&gt;
:The steamboat went to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Hell'''-o operator&lt;br /&gt;
:Please give me number nine&lt;br /&gt;
:...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rhyming scheme between the second and fourth lines, and implied contrast with &amp;quot;heaven,&amp;quot; causes the listener to fill in the word &amp;quot;Hell&amp;quot; instead of the innocuous &amp;quot;Hello&amp;quot;. Therefore, Cueball is wondering what a steamboat, an object lacking will,{{cn}} could have done to deserve divine punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is a reference to the 1930s pulp series &amp;quot;{{w|The Shadow}}&amp;quot;, whose eponymous character is a psychic vigilante. The 1937 radio plays introduction began with the line ''&amp;quot;Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows!&amp;quot;'' Unfortunately, since a steamboat is not a person,{{cn}} The Shadow would be unable to determine what heinous crimes the steamboat had committed to deserve damnation. Alternatively, this may be because boats are widely considered women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic, in particular the way Megan and Cueball are walking and its reference to theology, greatly resembles the later comic [[1505: Ontological Argument]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball walk together.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Horace Lamb said he would have two questions for God: why quantum mechanics, and why turbulence?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I'd have just one: ''What did Miss Susie's steamboat '''do?!'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.159.135</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2528:_Flag_Map_Sabotage&amp;diff=219420</id>
		<title>Talk:2528: Flag Map Sabotage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2528:_Flag_Map_Sabotage&amp;diff=219420"/>
				<updated>2021-10-18T13:59:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.159.135: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example map (of that of which sabotage might be intended) could be something like: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/41/0f/36/410f3661d1cee3b255b82a111f99d242.jpg ..? I have no doubt that someone is even now polishing off an initial Explanation, and wouldn't want to exit-conflict with them, but that's something like what I'd link to in order to demonstrate the thing being messed with. (Noting that the reference to North American territory both in words and the obvious Candian mapleleaf(less) flag as a basis. (Not sure, by sight, where the 'bite' matches, if not as per the red 'key', but note how Spain gets twisted in my link in order to not look odd with coastlines and similarly twisted Portugese neighbour cutting at odd angles through its stripes. That's the kind of thing this flag would evoke the confusion of.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.35|141.101.76.35]] 02:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's now over 12 hours later, I think you should add it to the text. I didn't understand anything about the comic or even its explanation before I saw your picture. Also, what kind of drugs is Randall on‽ :D [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 10:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Korsika coloured green on this map? It belongs to France. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.40|162.158.93.40]] 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's Sardinia, which belongs to Italy (the west of Italy is green). Corsica is north of Sardinia. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.140|162.158.89.140]] 06:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't help but thinking there's significance to the shape of the red area in the flag. Which country would this flag belong to in order to cause further confusion? And since it's red, why would any country cede part of its area to Delaware? Unless it's the flag of a newly independent Delaware? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.140|162.158.89.140]] 06:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only the south-eastern part of Belgium, which would already be Delawarian, is likely to border Delawarian France. The unexplored area (and most if not all of the tornado zone) would likely be bordering the white area (unclaimed? neutral zone? sea?) of France. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.69.120|141.101.69.120]] 08:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first thought was that this was a Canada joke, since the flag looks a bit like Canada's flag (e.g. red a white with a solid red stripe on the edge) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.48.151|172.69.48.151]] 13:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just added my hypothesis that this is a new US flag that nicely attaches both to Canada's flag at the top, and Mexico's at the bottom. It would be nice to try and produce such a map with Randall's design, similar to https://st.depositphotos.com/2353733/5164/v/950/depositphotos_51647815-stock-illustration-north-america-map-with-flags.jpg.&lt;br /&gt;
I would say that &amp;quot;Delware&amp;quot; might add new context to the flag from [[1815]], but if we assume that the three stars on that flag represent three states, and one of those states has to be Massachusets where Munroe lives, then there's no way it could also include Deleware and still be contiguous. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.71.143|172.69.71.143]] 14:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I kinda want to see what this would look like replacing USA on a map of the Americas now... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.131|172.70.134.131]] 15:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the above posts, yeah, I'm 95% sure the gap in the white at the bottom corresponds to the Gulf of Mexico. I think it likely that this design is intended to be superimposed onto the entire United States, to imply that the western portion of Canada continues further south and borders with the &amp;quot;newly independent&amp;quot; region of western Mexico. (Just ignore the enormous eagle to the south.)&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I would guess that the light blue is intended to suggest that oceans and other large bodies of water are really &amp;quot;disputed territory&amp;quot;? --mezimm [[Special:Contributions/172.69.71.143|172.69.71.143]] 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I suppose the flag would be separately superimposed onto Alaska as well as the continental US, so that would also be interesting to see...[[Special:Contributions/172.69.63.142|172.69.63.142]] 18:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I think we are all in agreement that we need a section dedicated to displaying the theoretical maps and flags, along with the theories as to why this may or may not be what Randall envisioned. (plus an honorary comment on how we might be reading to far into this by assuming it goes on an existing/real country) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.22|172.69.68.22]] 22:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't agree with the hypothesis in the sentence starting &amp;quot;If this flag is intended for the USA...&amp;quot;. I interpret this map to be a hypothetical new micronation within Delaware, where on a typical USA map of this design the state would be covered in a red stripe (perhaps suggesting that that stripe or all of them are greater Delaware). It makes more sense that Randall would establish a micronation just to sabotage these maps than it would to get this flag adopted as the national American flag. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.142.77|172.69.142.77]] 00:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any possible connection here to the &amp;quot;Red Flag&amp;quot; 🚩 memes that have been trending on Twitter recently? Is there some reason why Delaware raises red flags for Randall? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.54.3|172.70.54.3]] 17:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, we have Europe and North America already ... now, what if it's U.S. states map supposed to be sabotaged by this? https://ubique.americangeo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/map34.jpg -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 20:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ironically, that would make most of Delaware disputed territory. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.135|162.158.159.135]] 13:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.159.135</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>