<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.214.10</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.214.10"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/162.158.214.10"/>
		<updated>2026-04-14T08:21:19Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=241:_Battle_Room&amp;diff=174027</id>
		<title>241: Battle Room</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=241:_Battle_Room&amp;diff=174027"/>
				<updated>2019-05-14T03:05:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: Changed the definition of down to not include the word being defined&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 241&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 28, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Battle Room&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = battle_room.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Bean actually sabotaged it just to give Dink the excuse to make that joke.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
The book ''{{w|Ender's Game}}'' by {{w|Orson Scott Card}} is about {{w|Ender Wiggin}}, a boy of above-average intelligence, which means he is recruited to be trained to be one of the commanders of Earth's &amp;quot;Defense&amp;quot; Fleet should the {{w|Formics|Buggers}} invade again (future books renamed the Buggers to the Formics, to be more politically correct, since the British consider Bugger to be a swear word). Ender is taken to a space school called Battle School. At the center of Battle School is the Battle Room, where all the training revolves (literally and figuratively) around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Battle Room is described as a hollow perfect cube. &amp;quot;Stars&amp;quot; (smaller cubes) can be pulled from the walls (without changing the shape, more stars come in to fill the space where the old ones were) and can be used as obstacles in the Battle Room, as they will remain absolutely stationary, no matter what force is exerted on them. There is no gravity in the Battle Room. Most squads entering the Battle Room keep their orientation from the hallway (gravity in the hallway dictates where &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; is in the Room). Ender realizes that because the room is a perfect cube, and that even the entrances, called &amp;quot;gates,&amp;quot; are perfect squares and do not give any hint about which direction is up or down, that keeping that orientation is useless. He instructs his squad to orient so that the enemy's gate is down, a line of lateral thinking that gives his team three big advantages (smaller targets, &amp;quot;shielding&amp;quot; themselves with their own feet, and unprecedented angles of attack) and leads them to a perfect winning streak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The joke here, as made by Ender's squadmate Dink, is that the enemy's gate is &amp;quot;down,&amp;quot; as in broken. A computer or a website is said to be &amp;quot;down&amp;quot; when it stops operating or is unavailable, due to a cause such as a crash, the power is cut, or it is being taken offline for maintenance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text suggests that the enemy's gate was sabotaged by Bean, another, possibly even smarter, friend of Ender's, for the sole reason of allowing Dink to make the joke. This reflects the developments in ''{{w|Ender's Shadow}}'', the {{w|parallel story}} to ''Ender's Game'', which showed that Bean was manipulating many of the events of the original book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A scene is depicted from the Battle Room of the novel Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. The boys are floating in a room with random cubes.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Dink: Sorry, Ender — seems like there were some system crashes. The battle's gotta be cut short.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ender: The lasers still work.&lt;br /&gt;
:Dink: Yeah, but the enemy's gate is down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ender's Game]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2118:_Normal_Distribution&amp;diff=170697</id>
		<title>2118: Normal Distribution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2118:_Normal_Distribution&amp;diff=170697"/>
				<updated>2019-03-07T17:45:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: put back uncorrelated as the natural meaning of &amp;quot;orthogonal&amp;quot; in probability theory&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2118&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 1, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Normal Distribution&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = normal_distribution.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = It's the NORMAL distribution, not the TANGENT distribution.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by PEOPLE NEW ENOUGH TO STATISTICS TO NOT LEAVE IN ANNOYANCE. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Standard_deviation_diagram.svg|thumb|{{w|Normal distribution}}s and the intervals of the standard deviation are a topic commonly seen in introductory statistics.  Randall's chart is similar, but his lines are perpendicular.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In statistics, a {{w|Probability distribution|distribution}} is a representation that can be understood in terms of how much of a sample is expected to fall into either discrete bins or between particular ranges of values.  For example, if you wanted to represent an age distribution using bins of ten years (0-9, 10-19, etc.), you could produce a bar chart, one bar for each bin, where the height of each bar represents a count of the portion of the sample matching that bin. To turn that bar chart into a distribution, you'd get an infinite number of people (technically: a number N which tends to infinity), put them into age bins that are infinitely narrow (technically: bins whose size is O(1/sqrt(N))), and then divide each bin count by the total count so that the whole thing added up to 1. It is common to ask how much of the distribution lies between two vertical lines; that would correspond to asking what percent of people are expected to fall between two ages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many statistical samplings resemble a pattern called a &amp;quot;{{w|normal distribution}}&amp;quot;.  A theoretically perfect normal distribution would have an infinite sample size and infinitely small bins.  That would produce a bar chart matching the shape of the curve in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The area between two vertical lines of the distribution represents the probability that the value is between the x-values of the lines, and the total area is 1. Randall finds the area between two ''horizontal'' lines instead, which is mathematically meaningless, because the y-axis of a probability distribution represents {{w|absolute magnitude|magnitude}} as a fraction of unity (although we do have half of the normal curve between the two lines). The items represented by the magnitude at any given horizontal position are indistinguishable, unordered, and interchangeable; the idea that one could be above another is meaningless, and the fact that two items happen to fall at the same position on the y-axis doesn't mean they have anything in common. So, the comic explores the humor of annoying people by deliberately misunderstanding their work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An alternative explanation is that Randall has invented a new probability distribution, that we could call the ''tangent distribution'' (from the title text), the ''Munroe distribution'', or something of the sort.  This distribution is defined as follows: consider the area between the curve in the comic and the horizontal axis, and consider a random point (X, Y) uniformly distributed in that region.  Then X has the normal distribution and Y has the tangent distribution.  Areas between vertical lines in the comic give probabilities about X, and areas between horizontal lines in the comic give probabilities about Y.  So the comic gives a correct statement that the interval of Y values that is 52.682% of the range of Y centered at the midpoint of the range has probability 1/2.  Great!  Except this distribution has never been discussed before because it has no known application.  Moreover, it makes no sense to talk about intervals centered at the midpoint of the range because the distribution of Y is not symmetric: the midpoint of the range is neither the mean, the median, nor the mode.  So even if this distribution were interesting, the probability in the comic is not a good way to describe it!  We do use such intervals for the normal distribution because the normal distribution is symmetric, and the center of symmetry is the mean, median, and mode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the {{w|Normal (geometry)|normal line}}, which is perpendicular to the {{w|tangent}} line at a given point. Given a shape of interest, a normal line points perpendicularly away from it at a point, making a 90-degree angle with it in all directions, while a tangent line crosses a point on it and is exactly parallel to it at that point. The normal line is not at all related to the normal distribution, as the former is a geometry concept and the latter is probability/statistics one. Saying this to a statistician would only annoy the statistician further. This refers to the fact that the diagram attempts to divide the graph with horizontal lines when such a division would usually be done with perpendicular vertical lines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this is annoying to a probabilist or statistician not only because the terms ''normal'' and ''tangent'' are come from differential geometry and have no established meaning in probability theory.  Even the word ''perpendicular'' has no established meaning in probability theory.  Of course, the x and y coordinates in the comic are perpendicular (orthogonal) coordinates, but X and Y are not &amp;quot;perpendicular&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;orthogonal&amp;quot; random variables.  Even if we give &amp;quot;perpendicular&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;orthogonal&amp;quot; a probabilistic meaning, and the most obvious such meaning is either {{w|Independence (probability theory)|independent}}, which even uses a symbol related to the geometric symbol for perpendicularity, or {{w|Uncorrelatedness (probability theory)|uncorrelated}}, which makes X and Y orthogonal vectors in the Hilbert space of random variables that are square integrable with respect to Lebesgue measure, X and Y are not perpendicular in either of these senses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the more probability and statistics you know, the more annoying (ha, ha) this comic becomes.  It is not just about confusing novices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A bell curve of a normal distribution, with the area between two horizontal lines shaded.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The center of the chart is marked between the two lines:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Midpoint&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The distance between the lines is marked to the right of the midpoint, with the label:]&lt;br /&gt;
:52.7%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A label on the outside of the graph, describing the distance between the two lines:]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Remember, 50% of the distribution falls between these two lines!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:How to annoy a statistician&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Statistics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1035:_Cadbury_Eggs&amp;diff=170195</id>
		<title>1035: Cadbury Eggs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1035:_Cadbury_Eggs&amp;diff=170195"/>
				<updated>2019-02-27T14:27:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1035&lt;br /&gt;
| date = March 28, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Cadbury Eggs&lt;br /&gt;
| image = cadbury_eggs.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When they moved production from New Zealand to the UK and switched from the runny white centers to the thick, frosting-like filling, it got way harder to cook them scrambled.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Cadbury Creme Egg|Cadbury Eggs}} are a chocolate egg-shaped candy with a filling. They are supposed to replicate a real egg with a hard exterior and soft interior. However, unlike real eggs, the exterior is edible {{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] is trying to say that sodas have way too much sugar to even be appealing as beverages, because they contain as much sugar as 2 or 3 Cadbury Eggs, and one Cadbury Egg alone makes him feel sick. (A 12 oz can equals 355 mL, while a 20 oz bottle is about 590 mL.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, [[Megan]] interprets this in precisely the opposite way to what Cueball intended. Instead of comparing soda to Cadbury Eggs, she compares Cadbury Eggs to soda. If a [[1070|few]] Cadbury Eggs have the same amount of sugar as soda, Megan can eat as many as she wants year-round in place of soda, with no additional guilt. Cadbury Eggs are usually consumed around {{w|Easter}} — which is usually anywhere from late March to late April.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions the closure of the {{w|Cadbury Creme Egg#Manufacture in New Zealand|manufacture in New Zealand}} in 2009 and the change of the filling from runny to thick as a consequence. The joke here is the comparison to real eggs, which can be cooked {{w|Scrambled_eggs|scrambled}}, the new thick filling is not liquid enough to be cooked in a pan, as was the old runny filling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two Cadbury eggs, one in the foil, the other out of the foil and broken open to reveal the gooey center.]&lt;br /&gt;
:A Cadbury egg has about 20g of sugar. (25g outside the US.) &amp;quot;One Cadbury Egg&amp;quot; is a nice unit of sugar content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A can of soda with an equals sign and two eggs; a bottle of soda with an equals sign and three eggs.]&lt;br /&gt;
:One 12oz. can of soda has about two Cadbury eggs worth of sugar. One 20oz. bottle has three.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two unwrapped Cadbury eggs, with an arrow indicating they should be placed in a glass of water.]&lt;br /&gt;
:One Cadbury egg is enough to make me feel kinda gross. Now when I see Coke or Snapple or Nestea or whatever, I imagine drinking a couple of dissolved Cadbury eggs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan puts her hand to her chin in thought, Cueball has his arms out in exclamation.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Wow. Huh. So the takeaway is... I can eat Cadbury eggs by the handful all season and feel no worse about it than I do about soda?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: That's not really— &lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is ''awesome!''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: *sigh*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Cadbury Eggs and the high sugar content of soda are referenced again in [[1793: Soda Sugar Comparisons]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The Cadbury egg/soda comparison is also mentioned in the what if? {{what if|74|Soda Planet}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2115:_Plutonium&amp;diff=170028</id>
		<title>Talk:2115: Plutonium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2115:_Plutonium&amp;diff=170028"/>
				<updated>2019-02-22T18:29:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Even though space is cold, it conducts so poorly that spacecraft would probably have more problems getting rid of heat than keeping heat, considering how isolated they are. [[User:Tharkon|Tharkon]] ([[User talk:Tharkon|talk]]) 16:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- It actually has little to do with conduction; the heat radiates pretty effectively, especially as it gets &amp;quot;hotter&amp;quot; vs the surrounding radiation. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.124|172.69.69.124]] 17:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reminds me of reddit.com/r/outside [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 16:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I put in how the title text makes a probable reference to game development. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It could, with equal probability, be a reference to parallel universes. There's nothing anywhere that says anything about game development.... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.10|162.158.214.10]] 18:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This seems to be in the same vein as two other recent comics, Internet Archive and ArkXiv. Perhaps real things that seem unrealistic is a new topic of Randalls? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.247.4|172.69.247.4]] 17:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169179</id>
		<title>Talk:2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169179"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T18:47:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering what the joke behind the weird shapes of &amp;quot;softie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;punch&amp;quot; are about. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Bubbler&amp;quot; is definitely a reference to people in Rhode Island calling drinking fountains &amp;quot;bubblers&amp;quot;.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/51af5dc7ecad04c04600000c-750-533.png Bubbler reference, Joshua Katz], and [https://www4.uwm.edu/FLL/linguistics/dialect/staticmaps/q_103.html its data]&lt;br /&gt;
:The “bubbler” term is used in some areas of Wisconsin, too; I wonder how that happened. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.108|172.68.59.108]] 17:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Interesting. I didn't know that. In this case though, the map is pointing directly at RI. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I was devastated to see that 'bubbler' had not been given to eastern WI. I demand a recount!--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.10|162.158.214.10]] 18:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly a parody of this map: http://www.popvssoda.com/countystats/total-county.html&lt;br /&gt;
The isolated regions surrounding Atlanta and the Twin Cities are probably a reference to the similar pattern around St. Louis in the real map. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.78.40|172.68.78.40]] 17:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh man, this one is gonna have to be a table. Bring in the guy who knows how to make tables. I think it was the user Dgbrt. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.168|172.68.65.168]] 18:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1972:_Autogyros&amp;diff=154888</id>
		<title>1972: Autogyros</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1972:_Autogyros&amp;diff=154888"/>
				<updated>2018-03-26T22:06:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: Deleted extra space&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1972&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 26, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Autogyros&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = autogyros.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I understand modern autogyros are much more stable, so I've probably angered the autogyro people by impugning their safety. Once they finish building the autogyros they've been working on in their garages for 10 years, they'll come after me.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an ANGRY AUTOGYRO MAKER. Have created sections for explaining each of the statements. Think it will be better than a table.Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] has been looking at the facts about autogyros, hence the title of the comic. He has drawn [[Megan]] flying in such a vehicle with several statements of the facts he has unveiled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall states that an autogyro is nothing like a helicopter (which it looks like), nothing like a plane (but flies like one) and works like a powered parachute (without anything looking remotely as such). He continues to make a total of 12 [[#Statements|statments]] which will be explained individually below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final statement at the bottom rightis the punch line of how strange these flying machines are, because they are safe, as long as you do not do what a pilot instinctively would do in a plane in case of a stall, because if you do so the autogyros will crash immediately... See the [[#Extremely safe|explanation below]]. That sentence is almost rendered unnecessary by the one above it that states that autogyros [[#Never stalls|never stalls]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall's conclusion is clear: Autogyros are '''''weird'''''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text Randall continues on the last statement by saying that today autogyros are much more stable. Which must refer to that this was not always the case. And this new stability probably means that a [[#Never stalls|stall situation]] is much less likely and the last statement is then not so relevant anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall then goes on to suggest that ''the autogyro people'' will be angered by this comic, which [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/impugn#English impugns] (i.e. attack) the safety of their beloved machines. But he keeps on mocking them. In fact, he states that they will come after him, once they have finished building the autogyros they have been working on in their garage for the last 10 years. By this, he implies that the people who work on them do this as a home garage project so they will never get them finished and able to fly. Thus, they will probably never come after him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if a bunch of them do manage to finish their autogyros simultaneously and come after him as a pack, Randall will have trouble escaping the angry autogyro mob.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
*Below each of the statements in the comic are explained&lt;br /&gt;
**The optimal reading order is to read them in the four columns they are arranged in:&lt;br /&gt;
**The left with four, the two single in the middle and the six on the right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nothing like a helicopter===&lt;br /&gt;
''Looks like a helicopter, but is nothing like a helicopter''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nothing like a plane===&lt;br /&gt;
''Flies like a plane but is nothing like a plane''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Powered parachute===&lt;br /&gt;
''Sort of like a powered parachute''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rare in the US===&lt;br /&gt;
''Rare in the US, usually homemade. Common in Europe. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Big blade on top===&lt;br /&gt;
''Big blade on top is not powered and spins freely''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Flown without a license===&lt;br /&gt;
''Can often be flown without a license''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cheap===&lt;br /&gt;
Helicopters are notorious for being extremely expensive to operate. At a typical general aviation service in the US, a two-seat aircraft may rent for under $100/hr, while a helicopter runs over $200/hr. Similarly, a small used helicopter may cost almost $200,000 while a small new autogyro may cost under $25,000. Since many people home-build their autogyros, it would often be even cheaper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Needs a runway to take off===&lt;br /&gt;
''Needs a runway to take off, but not a long one''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Can land vertically===&lt;br /&gt;
An autogyro can land vertically: for that matter, so can any airplane. What matters isn't ground speed but airspeed, and as long as there's as much headwind as the landing airspeed of the aircraft, it will land vertically. Now, with fixed wing airplanes the landing speed is at least 40-50 mph, and you don't often find headwinds like that. The much lower landing airspeed of an autogyro makes vertical landings feasible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cannot hover===&lt;br /&gt;
True hovering would require the rotor to be powered. However, an autogyro must be moving forward in order for the rotor to generate lift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Never stalls===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Extremely safe===&lt;br /&gt;
''Extremely safe, unless you do the one thing you instinctively do to escape a stall in a normal airplane, in which case it will crash immediately''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a normal airplane, one will push the yoke forward in a stall or engine out situation, to regain airspeed and to stabilize the plane. On an{{w|autogyro}}, this leads to negative angle of attack, decelerating the rotor, which may lead to a crash. Also pushing the yoke hard forward while flying full throttle may lead to a crash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A picture of Megan wearing aviator goggles, sitting in an autogyro and holding the control stick. The autogyro is surrounded by sentence fragments, explaining characteristics of it. The one above the blade that concerns the blade has an arrow pointing from the text to the blade. The sentences in columns from the left (i.e. left sentences first, then the two above the autogyros body and finally the sentences to the right):]&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like a helicopter, but is nothing like a helicopter&lt;br /&gt;
:Flies like a plane but is nothing like a plane&lt;br /&gt;
:Sort of like a powered parachute&lt;br /&gt;
:Rare in the US, usually homemade. Common in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
:Big blade on top is not powered and spins freely&lt;br /&gt;
:Can often be flown without a license&lt;br /&gt;
:Cheap&lt;br /&gt;
:Needs a runway to take off, but not a long one&lt;br /&gt;
:Can land vertically&lt;br /&gt;
:Cannot hover&lt;br /&gt;
:Never stalls&lt;br /&gt;
:Extremely safe, unless you do the '''''one''''' thing you instinctively do to escape a stall in a normal airplane, in which case it will crash immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Autogyros are '''''weird'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1972:_Autogyros&amp;diff=154887</id>
		<title>1972: Autogyros</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1972:_Autogyros&amp;diff=154887"/>
				<updated>2018-03-26T22:05:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: Fixed some grammatical errors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1972&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 26, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Autogyros&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = autogyros.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I understand modern autogyros are much more stable, so I've probably angered the autogyro people by impugning their safety. Once they finish building the autogyros they've been working on in their garages for 10 years, they'll come after me.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an ANGRY AUTOGYRO MAKER. Have created sections for explaining each of the statements. Think it will be better than a table.Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] has been looking at the facts about autogyros, hence the title of the comic. He has drawn [[Megan]] flying in such a vehicle with several statements of the facts he has unveiled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall states that an autogyro is nothing like a helicopter (which it looks like), nothing like a plane (but flies like one) and works like a powered parachute (without anything looking remotely as such). He continues to make a total of 12 [[#Statements|statments]] which will be explained individually below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final statement at the bottom rightis the punch line of how strange these flying machines are, because they are safe, as long as you do not do what a pilot instinctively would do in a plane in case of a stall, because if you do so the autogyros will crash immediately... See the [[#Extremely safe|explanation below]]. That sentence is almost rendered unnecessary by the one above it that states that autogyros [[#Never stalls|never stalls]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall's conclusion is clear: Autogyros are '''''weird '''''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text Randall continues on the last statement by saying that today autogyros are much more stable. Which must refer to that this was not always the case. And this new stability probably means that a [[#Never stalls|stall situation]] is much less likely and the last statement is then not so relevant anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall then goes on to suggest that ''the autogyro people'' will be angered by this comic, which [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/impugn#English impugns] (i.e. attack) the safety of their beloved machines. But he keeps on mocking them. In fact, he states that they will come after him, once they have finished building the autogyros they have been working on in their garage for the last 10 years. By this, he implies that the people who work on them do this as a home garage project so they will never get them finished and able to fly. Thus, they will probably never come after him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if a bunch of them do manage to finish their autogyros simultaneously and come after him as a pack, Randall will have trouble escaping the angry autogyro mob.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
*Below each of the statements in the comic are explained&lt;br /&gt;
**The optimal reading order is to read them in the four columns they are arranged in:&lt;br /&gt;
**The left with four, the two single in the middle and the six on the right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nothing like a helicopter===&lt;br /&gt;
''Looks like a helicopter, but is nothing like a helicopter''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nothing like a plane===&lt;br /&gt;
''Flies like a plane but is nothing like a plane''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Powered parachute===&lt;br /&gt;
''Sort of like a powered parachute''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rare in the US===&lt;br /&gt;
''Rare in the US, usually homemade. Common in Europe. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Big blade on top===&lt;br /&gt;
''Big blade on top is not powered and spins freely''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Flown without a license===&lt;br /&gt;
''Can often be flown without a license''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cheap===&lt;br /&gt;
Helicopters are notorious for being extremely expensive to operate. At a typical general aviation service in the US, a two-seat aircraft may rent for under $100/hr, while a helicopter runs over $200/hr. Similarly, a small used helicopter may cost almost $200,000 while a small new autogyro may cost under $25,000. Since many people home-build their autogyros, it would often be even cheaper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Needs a runway to take off===&lt;br /&gt;
''Needs a runway to take off, but not a long one''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Can land vertically===&lt;br /&gt;
An autogyro can land vertically: for that matter, so can any airplane. What matters isn't ground speed but airspeed, and as long as there's as much headwind as the landing airspeed of the aircraft, it will land vertically. Now, with fixed wing airplanes the landing speed is at least 40-50 mph, and you don't often find headwinds like that. The much lower landing airspeed of an autogyro makes vertical landings feasible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cannot hover===&lt;br /&gt;
True hovering would require the rotor to be powered. However, an autogyro must be moving forward in order for the rotor to generate lift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Never stalls===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Extremely safe===&lt;br /&gt;
''Extremely safe, unless you do the one thing you instinctively do to escape a stall in a normal airplane, in which case it will crash immediately''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a normal airplane, one will push the yoke forward in a stall or engine out situation, to regain airspeed and to stabilize the plane. On an{{w|autogyro}}, this leads to negative angle of attack, decelerating the rotor, which may lead to a crash. Also pushing the yoke hard forward while flying full throttle may lead to a crash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A picture of Megan wearing aviator goggles, sitting in an autogyro and holding the control stick. The autogyro is surrounded by sentence fragments, explaining characteristics of it. The one above the blade that concerns the blade has an arrow pointing from the text to the blade. The sentences in columns from the left (i.e. left sentences first, then the two above the autogyros body and finally the sentences to the right):]&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like a helicopter, but is nothing like a helicopter&lt;br /&gt;
:Flies like a plane but is nothing like a plane&lt;br /&gt;
:Sort of like a powered parachute&lt;br /&gt;
:Rare in the US, usually homemade. Common in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
:Big blade on top is not powered and spins freely&lt;br /&gt;
:Can often be flown without a license&lt;br /&gt;
:Cheap&lt;br /&gt;
:Needs a runway to take off, but not a long one&lt;br /&gt;
:Can land vertically&lt;br /&gt;
:Cannot hover&lt;br /&gt;
:Never stalls&lt;br /&gt;
:Extremely safe, unless you do the '''''one''''' thing you instinctively do to escape a stall in a normal airplane, in which case it will crash immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Autogyros are '''''weird'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1813:_Vomiting_Emoji&amp;diff=137590</id>
		<title>1813: Vomiting Emoji</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1813:_Vomiting_Emoji&amp;diff=137590"/>
				<updated>2017-03-20T15:36:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.214.10: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1813&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 20, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Vomiting Emoji&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = vomiting_emoji.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = My favorite might be U+1F609 U+1F93F WINKING FACE VOMITING.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic relates to the recent Unicode proposal for a vomiting emoji. Megan believes that there should be vomiting versions of all emoji. She writes up a proposal, putting the new modifier at U+1F93F. Six example emojis are given, being progressively more nonsensical, starting with a vomiting cowboy and ending with a vomiting hand. Randall states that his favorite possibility is a winking face vomiting.&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: The proposed emoji for Unicode 10.0 look good.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Hmm. &amp;quot;U+1F92E FACE WITH OPEN MOUTH VOMITING&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Eww.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Really, &amp;quot;vomiting&amp;quot; should be a combining modifier, so you can use it to make a vomiting version of any emoji.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Umm.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: I'm gonna write up a proposal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:U+1F93F VOMITING MODIFIER&lt;br /&gt;
:(cowboy emoji vomiting) U+1F920 U+1F93F VOMITING COWBOY&lt;br /&gt;
:(Statue of Liberty emoji vomiting) U+1F5FD U+1F93F VOMITING STATUE OF LIBERTY&lt;br /&gt;
:(dove emoji vomiting, with an olive branch near its head) U+1F54A U+1F93F VOMITING DOVE&lt;br /&gt;
:(&amp;quot;first quarter moon with face&amp;quot; emoji vomiting) U+1F31B U+1F93F VOMITING MOON&lt;br /&gt;
:(rocket ship emoji with vomit coming from its window) U+1F680 U+1F93F VOMITING ROCKET SHIP&lt;br /&gt;
:(hand emoji with a hole in it, vomit is coming from that hole) U+270B U+1F93F VOMITING HAND&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.214.10</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>