<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.60.177</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.60.177"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.69.60.177"/>
		<updated>2026-04-30T03:56:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2924:_Pendulum_Types&amp;diff=340654</id>
		<title>Talk:2924: Pendulum Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2924:_Pendulum_Types&amp;diff=340654"/>
				<updated>2024-04-26T00:25:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.69.60.177: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example of the creepy fingers: https://youtu.be/3zoTKXXNQIU?si=MgZgSRFFyxrNGhw3  [[Special:Contributions/172.70.175.25|172.70.175.25]] 12:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that's as creepy as Maxwell's Demon gets, you have to wonder if he's related to Gachnar: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3090746901188850 [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.12|172.70.91.12]] 14:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fortunately, Maxwell's Demon can be banished with a silver hammer. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.246.151|172.69.246.151]] 15:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Is this a Dungeons and Discourse reference? [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 18:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ultimately that'd be from {{w|Maxwell's Silver Hammer|The Beatles}}... (Don't know that particular D'n'D thing, if that's a thing. Bet that's also a reference of its own.) [[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.70|172.71.242.70]] 18:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, whoever completed the transcript. I didn't know the bullet tag and the comics are starting to get more complicated to explain and transcribe. So again, my thanks. &amp;lt;3 [[User:Z1mp0st0rz|Z1mp0st0rz]] ([[User talk:Z1mp0st0rz|talk]]) 16:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Acheson showed that any finite number of inverted pendulum segments can be made stable through vibration. related video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJ7_fFABc9s&amp;amp;t=0s [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.131|108.162.238.131]] 17:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering that Maxwell's demon can reverse entropy, I welcome our new demon overlord. We must all put more starch onto speakers! [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Summon Ba'al the Soul-Eater to rule beside Maxwell's Demon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [[User:Z1mp0st0rz|Z1mp0st0rz]] ([[User talk:Z1mp0st0rz|talk]]) 19:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we use &amp;quot;pendula&amp;quot; as the plural to &amp;quot;pendulum&amp;quot;? {{unsigned ip|172.70.110.47|21:38, 24 April 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we mention that Netflix's airing of 3-body problem means people are probably more interested in chaotic systems right now?--[[Special:Contributions/172.70.39.36|172.70.39.36]] 03:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Plus there's the US elections coming up...[[Special:Contributions/162.158.95.97|162.158.95.97]] 09:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A double pendulum requires 2 weights, and additional one at the center joint. Surprisingly Randal has that wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.60.177|172.69.60.177]] 00:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.69.60.177</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2896:_Crossword_Constructors&amp;diff=335400</id>
		<title>Talk:2896: Crossword Constructors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2896:_Crossword_Constructors&amp;diff=335400"/>
				<updated>2024-02-20T21:56:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.69.60.177: Does it match their existing albums??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The top ten most common letters in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, and the percentage of words they appear in, are:&lt;br /&gt;
E – 11.1607%&lt;br /&gt;
A – 8.4966%&lt;br /&gt;
R – 7.5809%&lt;br /&gt;
I – 7.5448%&lt;br /&gt;
O – 7.1635%&lt;br /&gt;
T – 6.9509%&lt;br /&gt;
N – 6.6544%&lt;br /&gt;
S – 5.7351%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: https://www.rd.com/article/common-letters-english-language/  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/172.69.58.187|172.69.58.187]] ([[User talk:172.69.58.187|talk]]) 22:29, 19 February 2024 &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one of those &amp;quot;words&amp;quot; is already available&lt;br /&gt;
...oreta is a genus of moths: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreta  &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.64|162.158.154.64]] ([[User talk:162.158.154.64|talk]]) 22:36, 19 February 2024 &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {Yoko} &amp;quot;ONO&amp;quot; was over-played in crosswords a few years back. &amp;quot;ORONO&amp;quot; (university town in Maine) was over-favored by one constructor. Not to mention a sandwich cookie. [[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 22:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;quot;ONO&amp;quot; has also entered English from Hawaiian, where it means (a) good to eat, delicious; (b) the {{w|Wahoo}} (&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Acanthocybium solandri&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;), a species of fish. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.247|108.162.245.247]] 02:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:”Eni” is an Italy-based oil company.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.68.36|141.101.68.36]] 02:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to crosswords in german newspapers, those in american newspapers are typically not dense, right?&lt;br /&gt;
“Our” crosswords rarely have a single unused square.&lt;br /&gt;
And this is obviously easier to compose if you can choose from more words. --[[Special:Contributions/172.71.123.39|172.71.123.39]] 22:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was looking around the internet for an example, and I found this example: https://www.50plus.de/spiele/raetsel/kreuzwortraetsel-1.html&lt;br /&gt;
:If this is what you are talking about, Games World of Puzzles calls this a &amp;quot;Pencil Pointer&amp;quot; puzzle. I think technically the name is &amp;quot;Swedish Style&amp;quot; according to Wikipedia. They aren't typically the kind you'd find in an :American newspaper, but I do see them on occasion.&lt;br /&gt;
:Generally, the American style ones are less dense than Swedish but more dense than British cryptics.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.175.195|172.70.175.195]] 00:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, American puzzles almost always have rotational symmetry (at least 180 degrees, sometimes all four 90-degree turns)[[User:Mathmannix|Mathmannix]] ([[User talk:Mathmannix|talk]]) 01:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, 172.70.175.195, that is exactly what I meant. --[[Special:Contributions/172.71.94.236|172.71.94.236]] 14:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm confused, on reading the Explanation, as to whether these words are wanted for crossword ''clues'' or crossword ''answers''. I thought I knew, but it looks like other people might have the other idea. Either:&lt;br /&gt;
#In order to fit something perpendicular to several other words, in a dense and/or symmetrically-gridded puzzle, it ends up asking for a (currently) fictional string of letters that cannot be given a valid 'Easy' clue. They're seeking to make &amp;quot;2024 Nicki Minaj hit song (5)&amp;quot;, or similar, to become that, soon enough that they can publish the whole puzzle that they're otherwise happy with. Or,&lt;br /&gt;
#For a cryptic clue with an anagram/subselection element, they want a way to include, letters that they've found them unable to mix in otherwise. e.g. &amp;quot;Taylor Swift's 'Oreta' with Tenacious D's initial spin (7)&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;rotated&amp;quot; (ok, awkward example, but best I could back-contrive at a moment's notice... As opposed to something like &amp;quot;Turned a bit of carrot at Edinburgh (7)&amp;quot;, which would ''already'' work Ok for the exact same answer), using various typical tricksy and misleading mannerisms of a Cryptic...&lt;br /&gt;
#...or both? Being only a(n unskilled) ''doer'' of crosswords, not usually a compiler of them, I might well be missing the details that someone deeper into crossword-lore takes for granted.  [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.143|172.69.195.143]] 02:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Most likely Cueball and friends are constructing American-style crosswords and want to use ORETA, ENTA, and similar words as answers in their puzzles, so that they could clue them with &amp;quot;2024 Nicki Minaj album&amp;quot;, for example. (I imagine that when John Lennon entered into his second marriage, crossword constructors of America rejoiced since they now had a well-known person that they could use as a clue for ONO.) Since the letters in their proposed album titles are common, I doubt that a cryptic crossword constructor would be hoping for such &amp;quot;words&amp;quot; to exist so that they could use them in clues. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.150|108.162.216.150]] 04:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My initial reading was that these were awkward series of letters that appear within words that they're otherwise struggling to find clues for, but I guess why not all three.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.24|141.101.99.24]] 09:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
did any of yoy check out the new fnf rodentrap mod? i think it ws peak :) --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.188|172.69.79.188]] 08:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should main page include possibilty that there is no intended meaning in these words? {{unsigned ip|172.71.94.236|14:20, 20 February 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
:If you can explain what you mean (I'm not entirely certain, you leave it somewhat ambiguous), you can possibly include itself.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Unless you mean to edit the [[Main Page]] itself, which wouldn't be either right or technically possible, as you stand.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.166|172.70.91.166]] 15:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there existing albums by the named artists that are like the words suggested?  --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.6.107|172.69.6.107]] 18:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
     ^^^^^That was what I wondered. When I have time I might pop Ed Sheeran's albums into a crossword generator and see what I come up with... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.60.177|172.69.60.177]] 21:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.69.60.177</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>