<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.70.178.91</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.70.178.91"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.70.178.91"/>
		<updated>2026-04-17T15:59:41Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2962:_President_Venn_Diagram&amp;diff=347195</id>
		<title>Talk:2962: President Venn Diagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2962:_President_Venn_Diagram&amp;diff=347195"/>
				<updated>2024-07-25T13:22:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.70.178.91: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{notice|This site is intended to explain the technical details and inspirations (perhaps humorous) behind the comics. This particular page is for Discussion/Talk about the particular comic in question, which ''will'' involve some personal overviews and meta-discussion. But it is not the ideal place to reproduce the wi(l)der issue of public opinion, which the actual political process will eventually establish, and many other public forums and outlets exist in which you can convey your own current leanings/observations on the whole election-related happenings. Please be &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;sensible&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; ''typically geeky in your wit'', and try to keep all the ideological heat and partisan arguments out of this as much as possible.|image=warning!!.png|}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another really timely comic. Biden just dropped out of the race and endorsed Harris yesterday. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 01:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget Biden, Hillary and Obama. This is the endorsement that counts. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.23.199|172.68.23.199]] 01:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose no one is allowed to say that the upper right circle is mislabeled. It was supposed to say incompetent, dishonest and despicable. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.25|162.158.90.25]] 02:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're allowed to say it, but then we're allowed to suggest (with rather more emperical proof) that her presumptive opponent better fits your rewording. How about we all just don't try to re-run the old arguments (or pre-run the upcoming election) in that sort of tone, eh?&lt;br /&gt;
:(To be clear, Randall has made positive comments to his favoured candidate, rather than stooping to arbitrarily attacking their opponent. If you can't at least be as positive in your own convictions then it's really not going to help your cause.) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.6|172.69.195.6]] 04:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::First, Harris has more than one opponent, not just within her own party, but in the general election to follow if she’s nominated. Second, the many good qualities of my favo[u]red candidate are irrelevant to this comic, so I didn’t mention ''her''. Third, I didn’t start this political discussion; Randall did, by making a refutable claim in his comic. Lastly, there’s nothing arbitrary about a resident of California pointing out [https://truthout.org/articles/kamala-harris-has-a-distinguished-career-of-serving-injustice/ facts about the former attorney general of California] that people in other states, such as Massachusetts, might be completely ignorant of. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.253|162.158.186.253]] 05:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: You could say it, but then the box which says 'Kamala Harris' is mislabeled and 'Donald Trump' should be placed in the box above the middle one. [[User:Jaap-Jan|Jaap-Jan]] ([[User talk:Jaap-Jan|talk]]) 07:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also by saying the first circle is mislabeled you also say Randall is all those things. And if you feel that way, then remember you are free to NOT read his comics... I'm always on Randall's side in politics it seems, but I'm from another country, so I wont vote for any presidential candidates even if Randall was on the ballot ;-) I won't say more here now... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Note the difference between “upper right” and “upper left.” [[Special:Contributions/172.70.207.198|172.70.207.198]] 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well Kamala, you had a good run. Randall has the touch of death when it comes to picking political candidates. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.39|162.158.154.39]] 03:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You mean that no candidate endorsed by XKCD has ever won? ;) https://xkcd.com/2383/ [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 04:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall was smart enough to not make a comic endorsing Joe *before* he got elected like he did with Hilldawg and (now) Kamala.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.31|162.158.154.31]] 11:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Not so; Randall endorsed [https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/01/28/obama/ Obama in 2008]. [[User:-insert valid name here-|-insert valid name here-]] ([[User talk:-insert valid name here-|talk]]) 15:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe Randall secretly wants Kamala to lose and is doing 5D chess. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.130.122|172.69.130.122]] 16:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall angling for VP? [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 02:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Randall would be good president. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 03:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Meh, he seems to at least not be good at public speaking. And from what he says about himself, he would be distracted way too easily. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 04:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I, as an Epsilon Eridani native, think he would be a spectacular president, but his research priorities would swiftly result in [https://www.space.com/universe-end-false-vacuum-decay false vacuum decay], so please, for the sake of the universe, please do not elect him. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.214.218|172.70.214.218]] 20:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The layout of this Venn diagram reminds me of https://xkcd.com/112/ {{unsigned ip|162.158.166.234|03:04, 23 July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I would probably swap the two. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.174.23|162.158.174.23]] 04:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would be very interested in which non-Politicians Randall would put into the top middle section. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 04:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:People eligible to be president who would make a good president but aren't politicians? I would be much more interested in who he would list in the right middle section, that is, people who would make good presidents and love Venn diagrams, but are ineligible. --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.6.133|172.69.6.133]] 03:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess Munroe has no issues with questions about ongoing U.S. backed genocides shrugged off with &amp;quot;shrimp and grits!&amp;quot;? {{unsigned|Markifi|05:39, 23 July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What really strikes me is that the USA have a (de facto) 2-Party system and still go so much into personal attacks and endorsements, etc. which in my mind could be the decision-making bit between 2 similiar parties in a multi-party system, or 2 equally sympathic parties to me. But in my mind a 2-party system should at least have the upside of actually discussing policy, and voters deciding based on that... --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 06:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Randall was in charge he could stop supplying weapons to Israel probably [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.63|172.69.195.63]] 10:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall sempai- we are targeted too. {{unsigned ip|172.70.131.52|15:37, 23 July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: the mouseover text: &amp;quot;[[1062:_Budget_News|I am more of a deficit sugar glider]]&amp;quot; ought to be in the running. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.58.157|172.69.58.157]] 12:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
personally I'd put most candidates either the top left [[Special:Contributions/172.69.58.24|172.69.58.24]] 17:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neat.  A Euler diagram (and no, Venn cannot just have this one). {{unsigned ip|172.71.158.226|18:18, 23 July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Quite! Venn called his diagrams &amp;quot;{{w|Euler diagram|Euler circles}}.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/172.71.151.137|172.71.151.137]] 22:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the 'eligible' topic is related to a campaign against Harris saying she isn't eligible because she's not american enough. This (fake) news was reposted in France by french Trump's fans. {{unsigned ip|172.69.225.223|20:36, 23 July 2024}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_sigh_ I was about to come in here and suggest that we don't do the obvious political battle here but then I realized I'd be up all night because someone was WRONG on the internet [[386: Duty Calls]]! [[User:Tomb|Tomb]] ([[User talk:Tomb|talk]]) 21:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I, too, have rather strong political opinions that absolutely nobody here cares about. But I also wanted to extend a heartfelt thank-you to the person who put the cautionary banner to not make the main article into a debate platform. I hope its presence becomes a staple of articles on all forthcoming controversial comics, as we commence our quadrennial plunge into the bubbling muck of American election season. -MeZimm [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.59|172.68.34.59]] 21:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be a good idea to include a link to the actual United States Constitution in regard to the Presidential eligibility section? In other words, I'm wondering if it would be preferable to link directly to a primary source of information as opposed to a tertiary source like Wikipedia? Either way, I have a [https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/#article-2-section-1-clause-5 link to the document on the Congress.gov website] for those who may want to have a read. [[User:OmniDoom|OmniDoom]] ([[User talk:OmniDoom|talk]]) 00:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have a longer version of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWR2uTfrh-k&amp;amp;ab_channel=GOPWarRoom ? I want to see the diagram props! [[Special:Contributions/172.71.147.19|172.71.147.19]] 21:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;So many memes&amp;quot; https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&amp;amp;v=XOjRsJiBTF0&amp;amp;ab_channel=FoxNews [[Special:Contributions/172.70.214.129|172.70.214.129]] 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I see you are a netizen of exquisite taste. Might I suggest https://www.c-span.org/search/basic/?query=kamala+venn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.29|108.162.245.29]] 22:43, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh my God, infinite anonymous clipping! https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5125621/user-clip-venn-diagram [[Special:Contributions/172.71.150.3|172.71.150.3]] 23:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5125622/user-clip-circle-venn-diagram A fourth Eulerian circle emerges!] [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.5|162.158.186.5]] 23:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been decided. As per the [https://x.com/yashar/status/1815476912355205212 edict of the National Republican Senatorial Committee,] the problems with Kamala Harris are: (1) Her laugh is weird. And, (2) she loves Venn diagrams. Let the games begin! We shall [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI_lxFv203I&amp;amp;ab_channel=SaturdayNightLive focus on the two issues Americans do care about: swine flue and fracking.] [[Special:Contributions/172.68.23.200|172.68.23.200]] 22:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a really sad comic. Harris is a top cop and a corrupt one. America deserves better than either party is offering, and the supposed party of police accountability should not be running Harris. It's sad that Randall is telling himself otherwise. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.91|172.70.178.91]] 13:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.70.178.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2841:_Sign_Combo&amp;diff=326028</id>
		<title>Talk:2841: Sign Combo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2841:_Sign_Combo&amp;diff=326028"/>
				<updated>2023-10-15T20:06:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.70.178.91: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically you can get around this limitation by turning off the road before the sign and doing whatever maneuvers you need to out in the wide open area to the right or left of the road. It's not a U-turn if you're not on the road, and you didn't enter a restricted part of a road either, and didn't stop on the road. After which you calmly make a turn onto the road when traffic is clear. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.207|108.162.245.207]] 02:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm pretty sure swerving off of a road is also illegal. [[User:SteveTheNoob|SteveTheNoob]] ([[User talk:SteveTheNoob|talk]]) 04:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: You can always just pull over - if a cop asks, just tell him you were lost or tired or had to take a phone call. And then take the opportunity to ask about the bloody sign! Anonymous 07:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
So does making a three point turn count as a u-turn? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.58.66|172.69.58.66]] 02:40, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't putting it in reverse stop you briefly as you switched from forward acceleration to reverse?&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, this is also an example of Rolle's theorem as seen in [[2042]]. [[User:SteveTheNoob|SteveTheNoob]] ([[User talk:SteveTheNoob|talk]]) 04:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immelmann_turn Immelmann!]  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stall_turn Hammerhead!]  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_eight Half Cuban Eight!] [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 03:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could obey the title text if it was 45 miles per hour and 65 meters per hour, respectively. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.96|162.158.90.96]] 04:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Perhaps so, but anyone deliberately occupying a travel lane while going 0.06 kph (0.04 mph = 200 feet per hour) in a 45 mph zone would [ahem] rapidly attract attention for other reasons. If it were 65 *kilometers* per hour (40 mph), you'd have a narrow window of legality (I do drive on a road that has a max 45 / min 30 speed limit). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.214.43|172.70.214.43]] 18:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take notice of the road markings too. At least here in Europe double white lines are not to be crossed. And they go past the point of the sign.--[[User:Henke37|Henke37]] ([[User talk:Henke37|talk]]) 07:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't be the only one that sees a Gaza strip evacuation subttext to this. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Double lines are also &amp;quot;do not cross&amp;quot; in America. And I think in this case it's supposed to be yellow, the dashed-and-solid combo indicates a one-sided passing zone into a lane with on-coming traffic, and double lines in general are only use to separate anti-parallel lanes of traffic, both of which use yellow. &amp;quot;Solid double white lines&amp;quot; do exist, but are only used in very specific cases. Near me, there's a very congested exit, and the solid double whites are used to indicate &amp;quot;no really, you should have switched lanes ages ago, it's too late now!&amp;quot;, but since it isn't a Jersey barrier or a line of rods or even a full on median, nobody actually follows the rule. Anonymous 07:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: BTW in Europe, yellow lines are reserved for temporary use, and then take precedence over any existing white lines. Makes lots of sense, because there are so many construction sites here. (And the yellow lines are actually just adhesive tape.) --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.102|162.158.87.102]] 08:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Back when elephants had fur, road markings in the USA were white. Starting in the 1950s, road crews throughout the USA began using yellow rather than white paint. From memory, it took about a decade for the transition to be completed, with more rural roads the last to go yellow. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.161|162.158.90.161]] 18:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of lines ... in the USA, &amp;quot;Do Not Enter&amp;quot; signs on open roadways usually signal that the road ahead is one-way traffic coming at you. A driver is thereby warned (for example) not to enter the &amp;quot;exit&amp;quot; ramp of a freeway. However, the road striping indicates that passing is permitted for drivers proceeding forward past the sign ... which is nonsensical if the only legal traffic is coming at the viewpoint driver. I am reminded of the ancient comedy routine, &amp;quot;Somebody went to the Army-Navy store, got himself a sign, looked out his living room window, 'Look, Martha, we caught somebody!'&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.118|162.158.186.118]] 19:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I completely forgot why I was posting in the first place: I think there's good reason to create a full &amp;quot;traffic signs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;road signs&amp;quot; tag, not just &amp;quot;traffic lights&amp;quot;. I know there's a page with a very complicated &amp;quot;this is what the road ahead looks like&amp;quot; sign that just says &amp;quot;good luck&amp;quot;, and of course there's &amp;quot;Next Five Miles&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ahead Stop&amp;quot;. Thoughts? Anonymous 07:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would support that. I wanted to put this comic into a category but I couldn't find an appropriate one. --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.58.3|172.69.58.3]] 23:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thoughts: if you must not make a U-turn to the left, you should do it to the right.&lt;br /&gt;
And then return on the same lane, because of the double line.&lt;br /&gt;
And finally, the sign itself may be valid and not contradicting itself; it is your fault if you got on this road. ;) --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.102|162.158.87.102]] 08:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Netherlands, the message on signs are only valid behind the sign (with the exception of the &amp;quot;precedence way&amp;quot; (voorrangsweg), where outside of built-up areas, the signs are after a junction (though technically... way before the ''next'' junction) , so a driver stopping /u-turning here wouldn't be violating anything except the double white lines. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, stopping out of necessity (e.g. the car in front is also stopped) is ''never'' illegal. [[User:IIVQ|IIVQ]] ([[User talk:IIVQ|talk]]) 09:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Stopping on a road with double white lines to your left may count as obstructing the road, which I can imagine to be illegal in many places? [[User:Gpvos|Gpvos]] ([[User talk:Gpvos|talk]]) 10:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I had to comply with these instructions, I would just put the car into reverse and argue that I was never &amp;quot;stopped&amp;quot;. If I actually saw this in real life, I think I'd just slow down, put on my hazard lights, and make a u-turn when appropriate.[[User:Jsnider3|Jsnider3]] ([[User talk:Jsnider3|talk]]) 10:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UK equivalents: [[File:UK_traffic_sign_616.svg|50px]][[File:UK_traffic_sign_614.svg|50px]][[File:UK_traffic_sign_642.svg|25px]]&lt;br /&gt;
(Mounted vertically, obviously, and the Clearway would have to be the small version as a repeater/reminder, already being active).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;...and Title Text would require suitable numeric alterations on: [[File:UK_traffic_sign_670V20.svg|50px]][[File:UK_traffic_sign_672.svg|50px]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.23|162.158.74.23]] 11:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''Depending on the jurisdiction, signs may only apply to the road after them''&amp;quot; - uh, in which jurisdictions is that not the case? How could you adhere to the signage before you see them? --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.196|172.68.110.196]] 15:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't know US signage, but there are times over here in my locale when there's repeater/reminder signage, the situation (such as not being allowed to stop) already being in effect past a prior point. Or even &amp;quot;this is information you, as a driver, should already be able to infer from the rules of the road, but some of you are idiots and need A BIG HINT about something that you clearly have forgotten since the time you had to pass your driving test...&amp;quot; erected by the authorities. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.6|141.101.99.6]] 19:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the lanes are separated by white lines instead of yellow, that means that the two lanes of traffic are going in the same direction. There isn't any roadway visible onto which one could make a U-turn even if it were permitted. --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.59.204|172.69.59.204]] 23:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That sort of thing varies by jurisdiction. White and yellow are common because they work well and are cheap. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.58|162.158.74.58]] 07:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't minimum speeds require the vehicle to ''be able'' to go that fast, but not actually ''drive'' this fast at all times? --[[User:Coconut Galaxy|Coconut Galaxy]] ([[User talk:Coconut Galaxy|talk]]) 07:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who sees a Gaza Strip evacuation subtext in this? --[[User:GregXKCD|GregXKCD]] ([[User talk:GregXKCD|talk]]) 15:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Possibly. There was a similar comment above, but that was also posted by you. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.91|172.70.178.91]] 20:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is pretty much the plot of every Irish saga, except with geasa instead of road signs.  [[Special:Contributions/172.71.94.158|172.71.94.158]] 17:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.70.178.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2825:_Autumn_and_Fall&amp;diff=323430</id>
		<title>2825: Autumn and Fall</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2825:_Autumn_and_Fall&amp;diff=323430"/>
				<updated>2023-09-07T00:05:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.70.178.91: /* Transcript */ Basic attempt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2825&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 6, 2023&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Autumn and Fall&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = autumn_and_fall_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 392x212px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Of course in reality this is just a US/UK thing; in British English, 'fall' is the brief period in between and 'autumn' is the main season.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a FALLING BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Autumn}}, also known as &amp;quot;fall&amp;quot; in the United States, is the season between summer and winter. These terms are used interchangeably, but Randall in this comic treats them as separate seasons. His timeline uses &amp;quot;autumn&amp;quot; as the season between the end of summer and the &amp;quot;{{w|September equinox|fall equinox}}&amp;quot;, and the season of &amp;quot;fall&amp;quot; as the period after that until winter. Of course, while many different parts of the world use different ways of reckoning the {{w|seasons}} (eg, a two-season system in the tropics or a six-season system in South Asia), nowhere uses the type of five-season system shown in the comic.{{Citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic depicts two of the commonly used boundaries, for any given hemisphere, for the recognised end of summer. While other cultures have adopted yet other dates, according to their own calendars or local experience, [[Randall]] may have encountered up to three different 'standard' methods of dividing the year.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some treatments of the seasons (not shown) treat the summer solstice very much as &amp;quot;midsummer&amp;quot;, and all other seasons also more or less equally straddling their own equinoxes/remaining solstice, putting the seasonal boundaries half way between each of these astronomically significant points.&lt;br /&gt;
* For others, the equinoctial/solstitial dates are used for the changeover time, so that autumn/fall starts upon the equinox (shown) and ends at the astronomically shortest day which is then the start of winter. This system tends to be traditional where the annual warming and cooling of the climate significantly 'lags' the solar calendar.&lt;br /&gt;
* Meteorological seasons are handily aligned to months, for administrative reasons. Spring is March through May, summer across June to August, the September start (to the close of November) is as illustrated, leaving winter to be covered by December and on until the end of the following February. Or shifted round by two of the triples for the southern hemisphere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text makes fun of the transatlantic difference in terms, as it claims one must ''reverse'' these two distinct season names. The term &amp;quot;autumn&amp;quot; is, in reality, the word overwhelmingly used in the UK for the season commonly (but not exclusively) refered to as &amp;quot;the fall&amp;quot; in the US, regardless of which of the calendar offsets is to be assumed. The latter is rarely used 'natively' in the UK, although it will usually be understood. The main exception being that it handily allows for the mnemonic of &amp;quot;spring forward, fall back&amp;quot;, which uses wordplay to refer to how and roughly when British Summer Time (UTC+1) takes over from the default Greenwich Mean Time (UTC±0).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[A monthly time track, showing the stretch of August, September, and October. The date of September 6th is marked now, with September 23rd marked as the Fall Equinox. September 1st is marked as the Meteorological End of Summer. Underneath the track there are labels for the seasons - Summer ends at September 1st, which is then labelled as Autumn until the Equinox wherein a separate season labelled as Fall is from the Equinox onwards.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caption: Now that summer is over, the first day of fall is just a few weeks away!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Timelines]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.70.178.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2414:_Solar_System_Compression_Artifacts&amp;diff=228876</id>
		<title>2414: Solar System Compression Artifacts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2414:_Solar_System_Compression_Artifacts&amp;diff=228876"/>
				<updated>2022-03-23T19:02:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.70.178.91: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2414&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 20, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Solar System Compression Artifacts&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = solar_system_compression_artifacts.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Most of our universe consists of dark matter rendered completely undetectable by our spacetime codec's dynamic range issues.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
''{{w|Voyager 1}}'' is a [[:Category:Space probes|space probe]] launched by the United States in 1977. Originally designed to study the outer planets of the {{w|Solar System}}, it is now several decades into an extended mission beyond Pluto. The Voyager probe has made history for passing many milestones of our solar system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When images are compressed by a {{w|lossy compression}} format (e.g. {{w|JPEG}}), visual artifacts are created. Randall here is suggesting that the probe has passed the artifacts as if the artifacts were an actual feature of the solar system rather than a consequence of our technology.  The banding lines he has drawn are commonly seen in old images with low bit depth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 'solar system' in the snapshot appears to be a 4-bit greyscale-plane at a more pixelated level than the image given. It contains 16 'banded' levels from the brightest (closest zones, within this image, to the Sun) to darkest (the furthest illustrated expanses, including interstellar space), with irregular or non-trivial transitional edges but no obvious or dominant dithering/speckling or 'noise'. The Voyager image (and track) is overlaid in a white 'line drawing' format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each apparent pixel in this low-res rendering is approximately 1 AU², where 1 AU ({{w|astronomical unit}}) is the distance from the Sun to the earth. The Sun is off the left side of the image by about 30 pixels, meaning that of all the planets in the solar system, only Neptune would have an orbit that is within the image at all (at the left edge). The {{w|heliosphere}} is 120 AU from the sun, in the direction that Voyager 1 is travelling: Voyager crossed that milestone in August 2012. At time of publication Voyager was just over 150 AU from the Sun, as shown in the image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing on its course at 38,000 mph, or 3.6 AU/year, Voyager will reach the outer edge of the {{w|Oort cloud}}, the edge of our solar system, in about 300 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to 'our spacetime {{w|codec}}', suggesting a representation of reality itself as a series of ones and zeros. If empty space is the darkest possible thing that can be represented--which may be the case when only 16 levels are available (see above)--then it is possible that {{w|dark matter}} is ''so'' dark that it cannot be represented: it would require a negative number, which is not available. This is the {{w|dynamic range}} issue mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Artefacts are evident in [[1683: Digital Data]], and mentioned in the title text of [[331: Photoshops]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Irregular bands of gray are shown, shading from a white circular segment on the lower left side of the panel to completely black on the right. The bands have pixelated edges. A small white space probe is shown just outside the last dark gray band, in the completely black area. A dotted line starting from inside the dark gray area and ending at the space probe indicates that it is moving to the right, out of the gray area. Close to the white area, there are many bands packed closely together and with hard to define edges. But there are five gray areas clearly separated from the white, with a tendency to be elongated in the space probe's direction.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel]: Milestone: ''Voyager'' has passed through the streaming video compression artifacts that mark the edge of the solar system&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space probes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.70.178.91</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>