<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.71.194.113</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.71.194.113"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.71.194.113"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T07:19:40Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3055:_Giants&amp;diff=366846</id>
		<title>Talk:3055: Giants</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3055:_Giants&amp;diff=366846"/>
				<updated>2025-02-25T15:47:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.71.194.113: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone know why &amp;quot;the Man in the Moon&amp;quot; has square brackets around it? Stylistic choice, or clever reference? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.254.43|172.71.254.43]] 19:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I suspect it's to make it clear that it's all one block of text, otherwise it might be read as separate objects on each line. [[User:IntangibleMatter|IntangibleMatter]] ([[User talk:IntangibleMatter|talk]]) 20:01, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I thought that too but then Jolly Green should be in brackets as well.  I think it's because Man in the Moon doesn't have &amp;quot;giant&amp;quot; after it.  The rest all assume &amp;quot;giant&amp;quot; after (gas giant, etc.).[[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.81|162.158.63.81]] 20:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think that the difference between these two cases is just a matter of available space.  The space around &amp;quot;Jolly/Green&amp;quot; makes it clear that the two words go together, whereas &amp;quot;The/Man in/the Moon&amp;quot; would be crammed together even if the three lines were supposed to be distinct, unless the font was a lot smaller.  The brackets remove that ambiguity. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 21:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Given how commonly this community makes up answers, and how very little information there is on this, I suspect the correct answer to this question to not emerge here, but maybe somebody can make an argument that is actually convincing. It's certainly notably different and I didn't think much of it until seeing it mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.28|162.158.63.28]] 20:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's because unlike all the other entries in the diagram, it is not appropriate to append the word &amp;quot;Giant&amp;quot; to the end of it. Like, it's the full name of a particular giant, rather than a &amp;quot;type&amp;quot; of one as otherwise implied by the title of the chart. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.7.194|172.69.7.194]] 22:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, if only the Norse had referred to Ymir and his descendants as &amp;quot;Ice Giants&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Frost Giants&amp;quot;, we might have had another contender for that central space. [[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 20:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, let's not get hung up on what things are correctly named – the renaming of the Iron Man to the Iron Giant has always seemed very clumsy, but, alas, seems to have stuck.[[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 11:05, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Been a while since Randall's enthusiasm for Buns (rabbits) made an appearance in the comic! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.130.216|172.70.130.216]] 05:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Classifying the Atacama Giant and Cardiff Giant as 'Geological / Planetary' seems pretty dubious - requires an unusually broad interpretation of one or other of those terms.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.163.109|172.70.163.109]] 09:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't see this when doing so, but the intro explanation's use of &amp;quot;geological&amp;quot; needed editing ('maybe-quoted') to encompass the MITM's more accurately ''selenological'' nature, and (being lunar) it also really isn't &amp;quot;planetary&amp;quot;, either.&lt;br /&gt;
:Assuming that &amp;quot;planetary&amp;quot; is the fallback for rock-like stuff&amp;lt;!-- and here I'm loosely including all that which is the cores of the various 'giant' planets, so sue me! --&amp;gt; that isn't properly Earthly, it's a questionable fallback given that the Moon is... only a moon! At best, it's &amp;quot;a moon of a planet&amp;quot;, but then the semantic alternatives are limited (a moon of a ''dwarf-planet'', is the only alternative I can currently think of, until we also see 'moons' of artificial constructs given a planet-like status).&lt;br /&gt;
:But I also can't think of a better reduction/refinement (for ourselves, or that Randall might have better used for his current self-selected set), so contented myself with employing minor punctuated vaguity. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.4|172.70.90.4]] 14:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Poor André is once again left out [[User:Pmeisel|Pmeisel]] ([[User talk:Pmeisel|talk]]) 14:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May iron giant be a reference to {{w|iron star|iron stars}} that may exist (if protons do not decay) c. 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1500&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years from now? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.194.113|172.71.194.113]] 15:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.71.194.113</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>