<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=198.41.235.155</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=198.41.235.155"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/198.41.235.155"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T13:02:06Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1609:_Food_Combinations&amp;diff=105943</id>
		<title>1609: Food Combinations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1609:_Food_Combinations&amp;diff=105943"/>
				<updated>2015-11-27T22:29:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: /* Table of traditional pairings */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1609&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 27, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Food Combinations&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = food_combinations.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If anyone tries this on you, the best reply is a deadpan &amp;quot;Oh yeah, that's a common potato chip flavor in Canada.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Needs fact checking and some expansion. - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.rd.com/funny/21-weird-food-combinations-and-obsessions/ Unusual food combinations] are often counter-intuitive and can vary wildly by individual taste.  Real-world examples of unusual food pairings, such as [http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/dining/making-a-meal-out-of-peanut-butter-and-pickles.html pickles and peanut butter], french fries in chocolate shake, or even the comfort-food pairing of {{w|chicken and waffles}}, pair sweet, sour, or salty foods with a food or condiment from a different group.  In many &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; food pairings, though, the cross-over between sweet, savory and salty foods also exists, such as ketchup, a very sweet condiment being regularly applied to hamburgers and french fries, both savory and salty foods.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Randall]] lists twelve somewhat random food items. He then suggests that by using the right tone of voice, you can put any pair of these foods together as an &amp;quot;actually really good&amp;quot; food combination, no one will challenged you on it. This can either because they have likely heard, or tried other unexpected combinations that are highly recommended or liked. But it could also just be because they are polite, or did not really think about what you said due to you tone of voice. Or maybe they are like {{w|Joey Tribbiani|Joey}} from {{w|Friends}} who love any combination as long as it is something he think is good by it self - see [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSFgDZJVYbo this clip].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text extends the joke by recommending countering such a bizarre proposal with an assertion that the random pairing announced is an actual potato chip flavor popular in Canada.  This plays on the fact that in different countries and regions, cultural tastes can vary wildly.  For instance, [http://www.buzzfeed.com/tanyachen/americans-taste-canadian-ketchup-all-dressed-chips ketchup flavored potato chips] are quite popular in Canada, but are almost never offered in US markets. Lowblaws and {{w|Lay's}} have run potato chips flavor competition in Canda in 2013-15 with flavors such as Maple Moose, Bacon Poutine, Jalapeño Mac N' Cheese, Cowboy BBQ Beans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Table of traditional pairings===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Traditional pairings found in the list of combinations&lt;br /&gt;
! &lt;br /&gt;
! Ice Cream&lt;br /&gt;
! Ham&lt;br /&gt;
! Relish&lt;br /&gt;
! Pancakes&lt;br /&gt;
! Ketchup&lt;br /&gt;
! Cheese&lt;br /&gt;
! Eggs&lt;br /&gt;
! Cupcakes&lt;br /&gt;
! Sour Cream&lt;br /&gt;
! Hot Chocolate&lt;br /&gt;
! Avocado&lt;br /&gt;
! Skittles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Ice Cream}}&lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Ham}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Relish}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pancakes}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Ketchup}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cheese}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Egg (food)|Eggs}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cupcakes}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sour Cream}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hot Chocolate}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Avocado}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Skittles (confectionery)|Skittles}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| ✓&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| x&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan is talking with Ponytail and Cueball, who has his hand to his chin. Above them in 4x3 black boxes different kind of food is written in white text].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ice cream  Ham  Relish&lt;br /&gt;
:Pancakes  Ketchup  Cheese&lt;br /&gt;
:Eggs  Cupcakes  Sour cream&lt;br /&gt;
:Hot chocolate  Avocado  Skittles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: You know what's actually really good? &lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ____ and ____.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;white&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Megan:&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; food &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;white&amp;quot;&amp;gt;and&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; food&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Huh. I Guess I can see it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fun fact: if you say &amp;quot;you know what's &lt;br /&gt;
:actually really good?&amp;quot; in the right &lt;br /&gt;
:tone of voice, you can name any &lt;br /&gt;
:two individually-good foods here &lt;br /&gt;
:and no one will challenge you one it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fun fact]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1604:_Snakes&amp;diff=105178</id>
		<title>1604: Snakes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1604:_Snakes&amp;diff=105178"/>
				<updated>2015-11-16T23:11:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1604&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 16, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Snakes&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = snakes.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The last band of color indicates the snake's tolerance for being held before biting.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, [[Megan]] confuses a popular method of identification of the dangerous North American {{w|coral snake}} by its red, yellow, and black stripes with the {{w|Electronic color code|color-coding system}} using colored bands to mark the resistance of electrical resistors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coral snake has red bands adjacent to its yellow bands. However, coral snakes are {{w|mimicry|mimicked}} by nonvenomous species with similar coloring, such as the {{w|milk snake}}, whose red bands are not adjacent to its yellow bands. This has led to a variety of rhyming {{w|mnemonic}}s, such as “Red touches yellow, kill a fellow; red touches black, friend of Jack.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electronics, {{w|resistor}}s and other electronic components have their parameters marked on their body using colored bands. Resistors have at least three bands to identify their nominal resistance in {{w|ohm}}s, followed by an optional fourth band showing the {{w|engineering tolerance|tolerance}} as within the bounds of a certain percentage of the aforementioned resistance value. A red band followed by a yellow and a black one identifies a 24 ohm resistor (the Omega symbol, “Ω”, stands for ohms). See this [http://www.audionotekits.com/resistorcodes.html resistor code calculator]. Resistor color codes were also mentioned in [[227]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, Megan is actually holding a coral snake, which contains the most potent venom of any snake in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the fourth band specifying the tolerance but interprets it as the snake's tolerance for being held before biting, instead of the measure of the inaccuracy of the 24 Ohms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball are standing in some grass. Megan is holding a snake with red, yellow, and black stripes.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Red touches yellow, which I think means this is a 24&amp;amp;Omega; snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1604:_Snakes&amp;diff=105177</id>
		<title>1604: Snakes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1604:_Snakes&amp;diff=105177"/>
				<updated>2015-11-16T23:09:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1604&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 16, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Snakes&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = snakes.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The last band of color indicates the snake's tolerance for being held before biting.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, [[Megan]] confuses a popular method of identification of the dangerous North American {{w|coral snake}} by its red, yellow, and black stripes with the {{w|Electronic color code|color-coding system}} using colored bands to mark the resistance of electrical resistors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coral snake has red bands adjacent to its yellow bands. However, coral snakes are {{w|mimicry|mimicked}} by nonvenomous species with similar coloring, such as the {{w|milk snake}}, whose red bands are not adjacent to its yellow bands. This has led to a variety of rhyming {{w|mnemonic}}s, such as “Red touches yellow, kill a fellow; red touches black, friend of Jack.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electronics, {{w|resistor}}s and other electronic components have their parameters marked on their body using colored bands. Resistors have at least three bands to identify their nominal resistance in {{w|ohm}}s, followed by an optional fourth band showing the {{w|engineering tolerance|tolerance}} as within the bounds of a certain percentage of the aforementioned resistance value. A red band followed by a yellow and a black one identifies a 24 ohm resistor (the Omega symbol, “Ω”, stands for ohms). See this [http://www.audionotekits.com/resistorcodes.html resistor code calculator]. Color codes were also mentioned in [[227]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, Megan is actually holding a coral snake, which contains the most potent venom of any snake in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the fourth band specifying the tolerance but interprets it as the snake's tolerance for being held before biting, instead of the measure of the inaccuracy of the 24 Ohms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball are standing in some grass. Megan is holding a snake with red, yellow, and black stripes.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Red touches yellow, which I think means this is a 24&amp;amp;Omega; snake.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1579:_Tech_Loops&amp;diff=104759</id>
		<title>Talk:1579: Tech Loops</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1579:_Tech_Loops&amp;diff=104759"/>
				<updated>2015-11-09T05:56:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;RANDALL, WHY DID YOU GIVE ME AN EXISTENIAL CRISIS?! [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.113|173.245.54.113]] 10:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only three loops;  &amp;quot;Awful hack from 2009&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;IRC for some reason&amp;quot; forms one, &amp;quot;Tool&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Updater&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Library&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Tool&amp;quot; is the second, and there's a long one from &amp;quot;Awful hack from 2009&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Library&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Library&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Custom settings&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Library&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Hardware workaround&amp;quot; → &amp;quot;Awful hack from 2009&amp;quot;. Any other path not from &amp;quot;DLL needed by something&amp;quot; ends at &amp;quot;Repository&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.193|108.162.237.193]] 04:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the fact that &amp;quot;Repository&amp;quot; ends to be a sink (only entering connections) is a mistake - all other have at least one entry and at least one exit --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 07:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No, I think that makes sense. A repository is where something is stored. If it's in use by something, it's not a repository. Of course, I'm thinking that repository means something like &amp;quot;USB Hard Drive&amp;quot;, so I might be wrong. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.187|108.162.249.187]] 09:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I agree to this. A repository is a perfect location for &amp;quot;dumping&amp;quot; things where they never come back [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 09:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I interpreted it to mean that the repository hosts the things it is dependent on, using the things it is dependent on, making the loop conceptual.  The code that is hosted in the repository is only ultimately required because of the need for the repository to host thing code that the repository runs on. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.187|141.101.98.187]] 11:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The library at the bottom right does not have any entry, so there is also a start! So one that only has exits and one that only has entries! No error there I also think!--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't Buddha sais &amp;quot;The Path is the Goal&amp;quot;? Just because what you are doing is on path which seems to go nowhere doesn't mean the path is not worth it. Did you saw any tourist complaining that the trek he's on is supposed to end on the same place it started? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it bother anyone else that he wrote &amp;quot;soley&amp;quot; or am I missing something? {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.40}}&lt;br /&gt;
:It also bothers John and Nancy, but it doesn't bother me because he was obviously talking about doing it by means of a fish.[[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::The image is corrected [http://www.xkcd.com/1579/]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.154|173.245.50.154]] 13:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I see this comic I think its less about &amp;quot;how tech people find complicated solutions to things&amp;quot; and more about how as time goes on they end up with increasingly complex workarounds to get old stuff to work.  Like in https://xkcd.com/1305/ they wanted to use the chat group, but for that they needed the VM, but according to this comic they need hardware workaround for that, which needs a library to work, which needs custom settings, which needs a library, etc.... Thoughts? {{unsigned|Pyrolo}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't get the current &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; at all which goes off on a seemingly off-topic tangent on Android programming (not to mention that I don't agree that gps-based apps to find nearby gas stations are the typical introductory apps source code one might find.)&lt;br /&gt;
From the design of the xkcd panel, it's obviously targeted at a Windows desktop computer rather than Android, given the mention of DLLs. You could trivially substitute DLL by &amp;quot;shared library&amp;quot; (aka &amp;quot;.so&amp;quot;) and make it a Linux or other Unix-compatible system, which combined with Windows would cover 99.99% of existing desktop systems. And of course a reference to [https://xkcd.com/349/ 349] shall be made when it comes to hardware workarounds.&lt;br /&gt;
Given this context, the comic is more about how much of the time one might spend on a computer as a geek tends to be in maintaining the system itself rather using it, up to the point where maintaining the system becomes the main goal. Most people consider computers as tools to achieve something else -- e.g. to write a book or balance their bank account; however here Randall is using his computer just for the sake of maintaining the OS or the hardware on said computer. It's tools for the sake of tooling, rather than tools as helpers to build something else. If somebody knows how to express that more fluently, please do so.&lt;br /&gt;
:A hardware equivalent would be reprap: get a 3d printer and end up spending all the time printing 3d parts for the printer instead of creating something else like toys or art. &lt;br /&gt;
:I've modified the explanation with a variation of this; I've left the original explanation in place since maybe there's some value in it. Please edit as you see fit. [[User:Ralfoide|Ralfoide]] ([[User talk:Ralfoide|talk]]) 14:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, for many MIT students it is tools for the sake of tooling. Okay, that was a terrible pun that most people won't get. --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.155|198.41.235.155]] 05:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A great deal of all that we do, as individuals, and as a society, directly or indirectly maintains our ability to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
Such a tiny sliver of our lives is &amp;quot;unproductive&amp;quot;, but that's literally the only reason we do any of the &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; parts of life.&lt;br /&gt;
The only things really worth doing are the things there is no real reason for doing.&lt;br /&gt;
Does that make sense? &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 18:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a broader sense, one might even say that the basic human desire to socialise is evolutionarily advantageous, serving the purpose of continuing the species. In that broad sense, everything that we do is merely &amp;quot;maintaining a huge chain of technology solely to support itself&amp;quot;. Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/59/. It's easy to forget why we do things in life. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 18:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget about official &amp;quot;tech people,&amp;quot; even godforsaken ordinary users spend way too much time wrestling with this stuff.  I myself always quail when I see a .dll in the distance.  It has never ended well for me.[[User:NoniMausa|NoniMausa]] ([[User talk:NoniMausa|talk]]) 01:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes you eat too much dogfood. If you write a toolkit, and then find you need to write a buildsystem (or other infrastructure) and at some point find your buildsystem using the toolkit, you are probably doing something wrong. Note the exception of writing an IDE in your toolkit, for your toolkit, is not only okay, it is doing it wring.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.235|162.158.90.235]] 10:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm the author of the original explanation (that about Android things). It looked good to me at that time (mostly justified by the &amp;quot;things I actually want to do with my computer&amp;quot; bit), however the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; explanation by Ralfoide looks much better now, so probably mine should be just deleted (I'm not doing just that right now because I lack the time to search for useful bits to keep, if any). By the way, the Android story actually happened to a friend of mine just as told. :) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.183|108.162.229.183]] 21:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is me again from another IP. I changed the wording of my original explanation and changed the Android stuff to a reference to comic 949. Now I feel like the first explanation was awfully worded and this one says about the same thing but fits much better. Or something [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.236|108.162.229.236]] 10:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current explanation is wrong. The joke is that there are a lot of running components in Randall's computer (services, daemons, applications...) whose only purpose is to enable the execution of the other components in the loop. In other words, performing busywork, which is a waste of computer resources. The chain probably started when Randall wanted to test a new software in Linux, that is known to have a nightmarish package system based on dependencies, so he had to install a lot of libraries and perform some ugly hacks to get the software working, which in turn required other packages to be installed and tweaked. At one point, one of the packages or hacks had a circular dependency with the original software and created a loop. By then, Randall had already forgotten why he wanted to use that software in the first place, and now he only uses it to keep the rest of the loop running. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.108|141.101.99.108]] 10:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The footer begins &amp;quot;Every now and then&amp;quot;, so this is not about a single event. Also, the &amp;quot;DLL&amp;quot; part does not match this being Linux-specific. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.236|108.162.229.236]] 11:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah, this is not the first time he accidentally created a self-sustained loop, but it probably always happen for the same reason. It's pretty clear to me that the strip refers to a linux system because its software distribution philosophy is literally a mess, unlike every other system whose applications are self-contained in one neat file with no other dependencies. To support my point, note how the DLL files are conveniently NOT part of the loop; this is what makes them hilarious and what's baffling Randall: he has no idea about which component is relying on them because they do not belong in a Linux system. In any case, the fact that there is a (probably windows) VM running in the mix, plus an Irc client, points to the loop being multi-system wide, so that is a botch of epic proportions. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.108|141.101.99.108]] 14:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The isolated 'mystery DLL dependency' reminds me of the Programmable Gate Array evolution experiment where an interesting solution to a problem created an efficient but highly unintuitive circuit 'design' within it that contained a segment that ''was not actually connected to anything else'' but performed a vital function (removing the isolated elements from the 'design' produced a non-working circuit, as would 'attaching' it, even neutrally, to the surroundings), though not by any method that the design and specification would make obvious.  [http://darwin200.christs.cam.ac.uk/pages/index.php?page_id=h7 Here is one possible telling of the tale], although it doesn't exactly match the one that I recall.  Look at the paragraph immediately under the &amp;quot;Evolving Complexity&amp;quot; heading for this version, however. (Or in the paragraph immediately under the &amp;quot;Tron kiss&amp;quot; picture in [http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits/ this other article], that I also found.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.12|141.101.99.12]] 22:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1593:_Play-By-Play&amp;diff=104750</id>
		<title>Talk:1593: Play-By-Play</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1593:_Play-By-Play&amp;diff=104750"/>
				<updated>2015-11-09T05:06:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: Oops&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;First!&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry. On a more serious note, is &amp;quot;how rude&amp;quot; a reference to the ugly guy on the first Star Wars?  I'm sleepy and can't think well. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I strongly doubt it, since this is a completely unrelated topic to Star Wars [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.231|162.158.38.231]] 06:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the comic doesn't even include the phrase &amp;quot;how rude&amp;quot;... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.161|108.162.250.161]] 06:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why is Star Wars and its trailer even mentioned? Completely unrelated. The trailer aired during a football game not baseball. If Randall was trying to make that point it would be as such. This is more akin to a non-sports minded son-in-law trying to enjoy the sport with his wife's father (been there done that). Or perhaps Randall is saying that baseball is having a hard time trying to attract new fans with all the scandals so baseball has turned to reeling in non-traditional fans who need the games rules and play-by-play toned down to an understandable level. Anything but Star Wars.--[[User:R0hrshach|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach|talk]]) 15:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I read &amp;quot;Wow. Rude&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;How rude.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/108.162.220.227|108.162.220.227]] 17:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't the guy being yelled at in the &amp;quot;Wow. Rude.&amp;quot; section the umpire? I think it's more likely that people would yell at an umpire (or maybe a coach) than any standard player. 21:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The big issue I have is that he says there's no one else. There is the catcher. Would have made more sense to say two men are playing catch and someone else is rudely trying to hit the ball. Or that they're playing monkey in the middle... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.236.235|108.162.236.235]] 15:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Simple Words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone check if this is an instance of Randall Munroe doing a comic using only the 1000 most commonly used words? It looks like it might be. {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope! Lots of difficult words like &amp;quot;Wow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shelves&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;teammates&amp;quot; {{unsigned ip|198.41.235.59}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes should this even be references in the trivia. I vote for deleting the trivia, as I do not see this as an example of Beret Guy trying to speak simple, he just uses other words because he do not know the baseball version for these. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the transcript and title text into Randall's word checker and came up with eleven words that didn't make the cut (twelve if you count all forms of a word separately): &amp;quot;bat&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;shelves&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;wow&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rude&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;teammates&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;pillow&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rules&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;yikes&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;hopefully&amp;quot;, (&amp;quot;bats&amp;quot;,) &amp;quot;king&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;jail&amp;quot;.  --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.65|108.162.218.65]] 12:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Surreal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not see this as surreal at all. His description is spot on, assuming that he knows nothing about the game.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.79.73|141.101.79.73]] 06:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's surreal is the (somewhat implausible) scenario where someone who knows nothing about baseball (or softball, I suppose. Or sport...) whould be commentating on a game.[[User:ChrisBedford|ChrisBedford]] ([[User talk:ChrisBedford|talk]]) 06:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That's not surreal. That's ironic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.81|108.162.237.81]] 15:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's also business as usual. &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrrx5CgdZaA  And that happened!]&amp;quot;--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.127|108.162.242.127]] 15:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Pillow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is beret guy talking about a pillow? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.125|173.245.49.125]] 07:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read it as a reference to the points on the field (“bases”?) that the runner has to go around. The ones that are used as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_metaphors_for_sex a euphemism for touching genitalia]. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.236|141.101.104.236]] 07:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::See [[540: Base System]]! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Historically, the bases were made from stuffed fabric, they were essentially pillows.[[User:Tverma|Tverma]] ([[User talk:Tverma|talk]]) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Baseball and cricket&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not being American, and never having watched a game of baseball in my life, this sounds like pretty much the way I would see baseball. Americans can get the same effect by watching a game of cricket. [[User:GreenWyvern|GreenWyvern]] ([[User talk:GreenWyvern|talk]]) 07:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Until he said &amp;quot;second pillow&amp;quot; I wasn't sure if it was commentary on baseball or cricket.[[User:Tverma|Tverma]] ([[User talk:Tverma|talk]]) 08:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agreed, when you never have watched a full game of baseball even the explanation above is not enough to understand the rules and events he is talking about. So spot on ;-) We only play this in early school as we think it is a kids game (probably like many Americans consider soccer?) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And just like the football/'soccer' difference in naming local variants in Association Football, our baseball is generally called 'rounders'. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.75.185|141.101.75.185]] 13:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While the description of the game might match someone who never saw any baseball, the failure to identify cheering and heckling suggest he never saw ANY game nor other sport event, which seems improbable. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Although not for Beret Guy! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main text says the words are not part of the &amp;quot;10,000&amp;quot; common words. But Randall's simplespeak is only a 1000 word corpus -- ten hundred. &amp;lt;digressing rant&amp;gt; That's somewhat irrelevant given the dubious qualities of Randall's simplespeak anyway. &amp;quot;bat&amp;quot; for example is a common word that kids learn early in kindergarten and elementary school when they learn the CVC pattern, not to mention it's a fairly common theme for Halloween and children books. Same goes to some of the other words. &amp;quot;wow&amp;quot; is not a word but an onomatopoeia, and &amp;quot;rude&amp;quot; is a basic English word known to everybody {{Citation needed|}}. Somewhere along the line, followers forgot this is all a game and are taking it way too seriously. &amp;lt;/rant&amp;gt; [[User:Ralfoide|Ralfoide]] ([[User talk:Ralfoide|talk]]) 16:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Variant games&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might be interesting to mention which comments by the Beret Guy lead to the elimination of other ball and bat games, especially when only a single comment does so. For instance, it looks like the description of the game would also fit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pes%C3%A4pallo pesäpallo], a Finnish ball and bat game, save that in that game you don't throw the ball at the batter. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.164|173.245.54.164]] 13:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic makes me think of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptrSoRSq8vw&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be [[User:Macarthur1950|Macarthur1950]] ([[User talk:Macarthur1950|talk]]) 20:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It reminded me of this IT-crowd scene (never actually watched the IT crowd, just seen the video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjC38Z4T6zc [[User:Jack|Jack]] ([[User talk:Jack|talk]]) 22:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amusing to see various games ruled out in the notes. The one game that can't be ruled out is Calvinball. Being utterly random, there is a possibility that at the moment Beret Guy is commenting that the game overlaps the rules of baseball. {{unsigned ip|199.27.128.82}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can also be Nomic :D. --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.155|198.41.235.155]] 05:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chair shelves are the bunker, not the bleachers, no? This would make the people yelling from the chair shelves his team mates, providing &amp;quot;noise&amp;quot; and instructions about where to hit the ball?&lt;br /&gt;
AFAIK In pro baseball, it's a slightly recessed secure box from which they send &amp;quot;signals&amp;quot; to the batter, telling them what to do -- either bunt, hit left field, keep infield, allow the steal, etc&lt;br /&gt;
The batter has to not acknowledge the signals, and that way the fielding team doesn't know whether there was actually a signal sent at all. The psych strategy has the hitting team constantly send random signal &amp;quot;noise&amp;quot; i.e. movements that look like they *might* be signals, but mean nothing.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugout_(baseball)  Bottom picture on the page shows the chair in the dugout (bench) and the plastic seats the crowd is in (basically the same as in any other stadium) https://www.google.com.au/search?q=dugout&amp;amp;es_sm=122&amp;amp;source=lnms&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CAcQ_AUoAWoVChMIhMiVt9DUyAIVYjimCh1JKw9N&amp;amp;biw=1549&amp;amp;bih=965#imgrc=dtPIvP1bSgcIMM%3A   Importantly, dugout benches are often mounted to the dugout wall. Whereas bleachers (stadium seats) are mounted on poles attached to the ground. This, in my mind, makes me think that &amp;quot;chair shelves&amp;quot; would need to be wall-mounted, therefore dugout. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.217|162.158.2.217]] 22:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not at all. Most dugouts are actual benches. Hes talking about the folding chairs in the stands. &lt;br /&gt;
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8wD8kiPsUKZz9dqfSgiQE3vztPd0rj60WDKKCVDxdMDSM2_dzbA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice they mount to the wall behind them. Some don't but some do. His explanations aren't perfect presumably because Randall isnt a baseball fan. Everyone is way over thinking this. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.60}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Second Pillow&lt;br /&gt;
The text currently complains that Beret Guy wouldn't know which pillow was second, but this is the fifth period, folks! Beret Guy is not dumb just lacking experience. It's not unreasonable that enough runners have reached the second pillow or even gotten all the way back to the house pillow and given up, for Beret Guy to figure that out. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.236.175|108.162.236.175]] 14:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Reference&lt;br /&gt;
Could this also be a reference to all the nerds being 'forced' to watch Monday night football to watch the new The Force Awakens trailer released just two days before this comic? {{unsigned ip|162.158.255.82}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;The inning&lt;br /&gt;
he says their on part five of hitting game could that also mean their in the top of the third {{unsigned ip|Fdfpi47}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say it's possible. Since it's likely Beret Guy is watching the game live in front of him, he may not know the distinction of top/bottom innings. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.239|108.162.223.239]] 05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Title&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain the title &amp;quot;play-by-play&amp;quot;? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.149|162.158.114.149]] 22:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In sport reporting, [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/play-by-play play-by-play] means giving detailed descriptions (in some level) of the events happening on the field. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.239|108.162.223.239]] 05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Isn't there another comic where Beret Guy uses all the wrong words for things?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just can't remember which one it is...  [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.116|173.245.54.116]] 17:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any significance to the fact that Beret Guy is apparently wearing Beats brand headphones?  Sportscasters generally do not use such, maybe another indicator of his inexperience?  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 02:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Stolen Base&lt;br /&gt;
If the runner ran to second base and no one noticed, wouldn't that imply that there was no attempt to get the runner out? If so, wouldn't that be [http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Defensive_Indifference Defensive Indifference] instead of a stolen base? {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Fourth panel&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't &amp;quot;This thrower is good! He keeps making people leave by throwing balls at them.&amp;quot; more likely a reference to the pitcher hitting the batters and advancing them to first base, rather than just walking them (or striking them out)? That interpretation would make Beret Guy's assessment of the pitcher's performance completely wrong (he's actually rather bad, not good), which seems to fit better with the tone of the comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.220|162.158.90.220]] 06:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1593:_Play-By-Play&amp;diff=104749</id>
		<title>Talk:1593: Play-By-Play</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1593:_Play-By-Play&amp;diff=104749"/>
				<updated>2015-11-09T05:05:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;198.41.235.155: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;First!&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry. On a more serious note, is &amp;quot;how rude&amp;quot; a reference to the ugly guy on the first Star Wars?  I'm sleepy and can't think well. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I strongly doubt it, since this is a completely unrelated topic to Star Wars [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.231|162.158.38.231]] 06:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the comic doesn't even include the phrase &amp;quot;how rude&amp;quot;... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.161|108.162.250.161]] 06:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why is Star Wars and its trailer even mentioned? Completely unrelated. The trailer aired during a football game not baseball. If Randall was trying to make that point it would be as such. This is more akin to a non-sports minded son-in-law trying to enjoy the sport with his wife's father (been there done that). Or perhaps Randall is saying that baseball is having a hard time trying to attract new fans with all the scandals so baseball has turned to reeling in non-traditional fans who need the games rules and play-by-play toned down to an understandable level. Anything but Star Wars.--[[User:R0hrshach|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach|talk]]) 15:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I read &amp;quot;Wow. Rude&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;How rude.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/108.162.220.227|108.162.220.227]] 17:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't the guy being yelled at in the &amp;quot;Wow. Rude.&amp;quot; section the umpire? I think it's more likely that people would yell at an umpire (or maybe a coach) than any standard player. 21:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The big issue I have is that he says there's no one else. There is the catcher. Would have made more sense to say two men are playing catch and someone else is rudely trying to hit the ball. Or that they're playing monkey in the middle... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.236.235|108.162.236.235]] 15:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Simple Words&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone check if this is an instance of Randall Munroe doing a comic using only the 1000 most commonly used words? It looks like it might be. {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.197}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope! Lots of difficult words like &amp;quot;Wow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shelves&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;teammates&amp;quot; {{unsigned ip|198.41.235.59}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes should this even be references in the trivia. I vote for deleting the trivia, as I do not see this as an example of Beret Guy trying to speak simple, he just uses other words because he do not know the baseball version for these. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the transcript and title text into Randall's word checker and came up with eleven words that didn't make the cut (twelve if you count all forms of a word separately): &amp;quot;bat&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;shelves&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;wow&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rude&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;teammates&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;pillow&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rules&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;yikes&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;hopefully&amp;quot;, (&amp;quot;bats&amp;quot;,) &amp;quot;king&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;jail&amp;quot;.  --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.65|108.162.218.65]] 12:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Surreal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not see this as surreal at all. His description is spot on, assuming that he knows nothing about the game.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.79.73|141.101.79.73]] 06:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's surreal is the (somewhat implausible) scenario where someone who knows nothing about baseball (or softball, I suppose. Or sport...) whould be commentating on a game.[[User:ChrisBedford|ChrisBedford]] ([[User talk:ChrisBedford|talk]]) 06:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That's not surreal. That's ironic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.81|108.162.237.81]] 15:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's also business as usual. &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrrx5CgdZaA  And that happened!]&amp;quot;--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.127|108.162.242.127]] 15:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Pillow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is beret guy talking about a pillow? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.125|173.245.49.125]] 07:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read it as a reference to the points on the field (“bases”?) that the runner has to go around. The ones that are used as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_metaphors_for_sex a euphemism for touching genitalia]. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.236|141.101.104.236]] 07:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::See [[540: Base System]]! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Historically, the bases were made from stuffed fabric, they were essentially pillows.[[User:Tverma|Tverma]] ([[User talk:Tverma|talk]]) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Baseball and cricket&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not being American, and never having watched a game of baseball in my life, this sounds like pretty much the way I would see baseball. Americans can get the same effect by watching a game of cricket. [[User:GreenWyvern|GreenWyvern]] ([[User talk:GreenWyvern|talk]]) 07:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Until he said &amp;quot;second pillow&amp;quot; I wasn't sure if it was commentary on baseball or cricket.[[User:Tverma|Tverma]] ([[User talk:Tverma|talk]]) 08:05, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agreed, when you never have watched a full game of baseball even the explanation above is not enough to understand the rules and events he is talking about. So spot on ;-) We only play this in early school as we think it is a kids game (probably like many Americans consider soccer?) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And just like the football/'soccer' difference in naming local variants in Association Football, our baseball is generally called 'rounders'. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.75.185|141.101.75.185]] 13:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While the description of the game might match someone who never saw any baseball, the failure to identify cheering and heckling suggest he never saw ANY game nor other sport event, which seems improbable. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Although not for Beret Guy! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Main text says the words are not part of the &amp;quot;10,000&amp;quot; common words. But Randall's simplespeak is only a 1000 word corpus -- ten hundred. &amp;lt;digressing rant&amp;gt; That's somewhat irrelevant given the dubious qualities of Randall's simplespeak anyway. &amp;quot;bat&amp;quot; for example is a common word that kids learn early in kindergarten and elementary school when they learn the CVC pattern, not to mention it's a fairly common theme for Halloween and children books. Same goes to some of the other words. &amp;quot;wow&amp;quot; is not a word but an onomatopoeia, and &amp;quot;rude&amp;quot; is a basic English word known to everybody {{Citation needed|}}. Somewhere along the line, followers forgot this is all a game and are taking it way too seriously. &amp;lt;/rant&amp;gt; [[User:Ralfoide|Ralfoide]] ([[User talk:Ralfoide|talk]]) 16:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Variant games&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might be interesting to mention which comments by the Beret Guy lead to the elimination of other ball and bat games, especially when only a single comment does so. For instance, it looks like the description of the game would also fit [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pes%C3%A4pallo pesäpallo], a Finnish ball and bat game, save that in that game you don't throw the ball at the batter. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.164|173.245.54.164]] 13:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic makes me think of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptrSoRSq8vw&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be [[User:Macarthur1950|Macarthur1950]] ([[User talk:Macarthur1950|talk]]) 20:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It reminded me of this IT-crowd scene (never actually watched the IT crowd, just seen the video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjC38Z4T6zc [[User:Jack|Jack]] ([[User talk:Jack|talk]]) 22:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's amusing to see various games ruled out in the notes. The one game that can't be ruled out is Calvinball. Being utterly random, there is a possibility that at the moment Beret Guy is commenting that the game overlaps the rules of baseball. {{unsigned ip|199.27.128.82}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;It can also be Nomic :D. --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.155|198.41.235.155]] 05:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chair shelves are the bunker, not the bleachers, no? This would make the people yelling from the chair shelves his team mates, providing &amp;quot;noise&amp;quot; and instructions about where to hit the ball?&lt;br /&gt;
AFAIK In pro baseball, it's a slightly recessed secure box from which they send &amp;quot;signals&amp;quot; to the batter, telling them what to do -- either bunt, hit left field, keep infield, allow the steal, etc&lt;br /&gt;
The batter has to not acknowledge the signals, and that way the fielding team doesn't know whether there was actually a signal sent at all. The psych strategy has the hitting team constantly send random signal &amp;quot;noise&amp;quot; i.e. movements that look like they *might* be signals, but mean nothing.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugout_(baseball)  Bottom picture on the page shows the chair in the dugout (bench) and the plastic seats the crowd is in (basically the same as in any other stadium) https://www.google.com.au/search?q=dugout&amp;amp;es_sm=122&amp;amp;source=lnms&amp;amp;tbm=isch&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CAcQ_AUoAWoVChMIhMiVt9DUyAIVYjimCh1JKw9N&amp;amp;biw=1549&amp;amp;bih=965#imgrc=dtPIvP1bSgcIMM%3A   Importantly, dugout benches are often mounted to the dugout wall. Whereas bleachers (stadium seats) are mounted on poles attached to the ground. This, in my mind, makes me think that &amp;quot;chair shelves&amp;quot; would need to be wall-mounted, therefore dugout. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.217|162.158.2.217]] 22:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not at all. Most dugouts are actual benches. Hes talking about the folding chairs in the stands. &lt;br /&gt;
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT8wD8kiPsUKZz9dqfSgiQE3vztPd0rj60WDKKCVDxdMDSM2_dzbA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice they mount to the wall behind them. Some don't but some do. His explanations aren't perfect presumably because Randall isnt a baseball fan. Everyone is way over thinking this. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.60}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Second Pillow&lt;br /&gt;
The text currently complains that Beret Guy wouldn't know which pillow was second, but this is the fifth period, folks! Beret Guy is not dumb just lacking experience. It's not unreasonable that enough runners have reached the second pillow or even gotten all the way back to the house pillow and given up, for Beret Guy to figure that out. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.236.175|108.162.236.175]] 14:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Reference&lt;br /&gt;
Could this also be a reference to all the nerds being 'forced' to watch Monday night football to watch the new The Force Awakens trailer released just two days before this comic? {{unsigned ip|162.158.255.82}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;The inning&lt;br /&gt;
he says their on part five of hitting game could that also mean their in the top of the third {{unsigned ip|Fdfpi47}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say it's possible. Since it's likely Beret Guy is watching the game live in front of him, he may not know the distinction of top/bottom innings. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.239|108.162.223.239]] 05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Title&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain the title &amp;quot;play-by-play&amp;quot;? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.149|162.158.114.149]] 22:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In sport reporting, [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/play-by-play play-by-play] means giving detailed descriptions (in some level) of the events happening on the field. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.239|108.162.223.239]] 05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Isn't there another comic where Beret Guy uses all the wrong words for things?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just can't remember which one it is...  [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.116|173.245.54.116]] 17:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any significance to the fact that Beret Guy is apparently wearing Beats brand headphones?  Sportscasters generally do not use such, maybe another indicator of his inexperience?  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 02:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Stolen Base&lt;br /&gt;
If the runner ran to second base and no one noticed, wouldn't that imply that there was no attempt to get the runner out? If so, wouldn't that be [http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Defensive_Indifference Defensive Indifference] instead of a stolen base? {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Fourth panel&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't &amp;quot;This thrower is good! He keeps making people leave by throwing balls at them.&amp;quot; more likely a reference to the pitcher hitting the batters and advancing them to first base, rather than just walking them (or striking them out)? That interpretation would make Beret Guy's assessment of the pitcher's performance completely wrong (he's actually rather bad, not good), which seems to fit better with the tone of the comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.220|162.158.90.220]] 06:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>198.41.235.155</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>