<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=199.27.128.91</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=199.27.128.91"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/199.27.128.91"/>
		<updated>2026-06-25T07:36:28Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:471:_Aversion_Fads&amp;diff=103084</id>
		<title>Talk:471: Aversion Fads</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:471:_Aversion_Fads&amp;diff=103084"/>
				<updated>2015-10-09T04:22:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;199.27.128.91: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The inclusion of a Fox is notable, within the Furry community foxes are the most populous species [Citation: https://sites.google.com/site/anthropomorphicresearch/home ] and subjected to a degree of derision from other furs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/78.40.152.129|78.40.152.129]] 10:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Feefers (A Furry)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your mention of fox-morphism reminds me of {{w|Lady into Fox}}, from the 1920s...  Probably not relevent, but perhaps interesting as a pre-Internet example that is not itself an ancient fable, legend or allegory.  (No Rule 34ing, though, that I recall). [[Special:Contributions/178.107.249.215|178.107.249.215]] 22:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At that novel a lady suddenly turns into a real fox, this is not true for this comic. It's just the Furry community.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know if this is Randall's actual opinion of furries? I've wondered that ever since I first read this comic. [[User:Leafy Greens|Leafy Greens]] ([[User talk:Leafy Greens|talk]]) 15:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's possible that the &amp;quot;Hey, kid&amp;quot; line is a reference to the &amp;quot;Hey, kid, wanna yiff?&amp;quot; meme (possibly based on another, &amp;quot;hey kid, wanna see a dead body&amp;quot;) which was made 4 months -1 day prior to this strip release, apparently for a furry pick-up line contest on FurAffinity [got this from knowyourmeme].  Also, the title &amp;quot; Aversion Fad&amp;quot; might be suggesting that the anti-Furry attitude/meme/whatever is just a fad or meme.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.158|108.162.237.158]] 19:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Randall has particularly picked up on the furry stereotype than what furries actually are. [[User:International Space Station|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station|talk]]) 01:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been wanting to fix this for over a year. This comic is written about furries, so I only think it's fair that the explain is written by someone who actually knows about the furry fandom--you know, an *actual* furry who, you know, isn't into the sexual stuff, i.e. me. [[User:International Space Station|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station|talk]]) 02:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Fair, but the explanation is now much too long. Added incomplete tag as such. I really appreciate you trying to bring this more in line with reality, but we're not here to discuss culture, we're here to explain xkcd. If you disagree, feel free to remove the tag. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.91|199.27.128.91]] 04:22, 9 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>199.27.128.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1572:_xkcd_Survey&amp;diff=101363</id>
		<title>Talk:1572: xkcd Survey</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1572:_xkcd_Survey&amp;diff=101363"/>
				<updated>2015-09-08T21:30:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;199.27.128.91: added comment about image maps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Mildly interesting to note that the ordering of most of the checkbox/radiobutton lists randomise each time the survery is loaded. Also, there is at least one other comic where Randall comments about not having figured out HTML imagemaps. Anyone remember which? --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 10:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It was in one of his &amp;quot;under the logo&amp;quot; news bars, about him starting What If, iirc --[[User:Aescula|Aescula]] ([[User talk:Aescula|talk]]) 11:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many people, on reading 'Type &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; here:', typed '&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; here:'?  I know I did... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.214|141.101.98.214]] 11:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Guilty...--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 12:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Me too... However you could have typed '&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; here:', as well... (/edit: I wonder how many different entries the survey's result will reveal) (/edit2: I did not read properly... sorry. I typed '&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot;' not '&amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; here:' -.-)[[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:  I typed meow -[[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.86|141.101.105.86]] 12:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Where it said &amp;quot;Type five random words&amp;quot; I typed &amp;quot;five random words&amp;quot; (without the quotes).&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) 11:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My first thought there was &amp;quot;Correct Horse Battery Staple&amp;quot;[[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.47|162.158.255.47]] 04:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Those were the first four of my five &amp;quot;random words&amp;quot;. -- [[User:Pne|Pne]] ([[User talk:Pne|talk]]) 17:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Man, why didn't I think of that? [[User:Sobsz|Sobsz]] ([[User talk:Sobsz|talk]]) 06:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I tried to make it at least a bit random, rather than arbitrary, with a bash script: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;for _ in 1 2 3 4 5; do sed -n &amp;quot;$(((((32768*RANDOM)+RANDOM) % $(wc -l &amp;lt;/usr/share/dict/words) ) + 1))p&amp;quot; /usr/share/dict/words; done&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; -- ferret [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.121|141.101.99.121]] 11:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure if it was just me, but the comic wasn't a link at all! The cursor changed into a No cursor for me everytime I mouseover'd the comic. I went to survey using the &amp;quot;Bonus Link!&amp;quot; below the comic page. [[User:Brilliantnut|Brilliantnut]] ([[User talk:Brilliantnut|talk]]) 12:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Never mind, this was probably due to the WebComics reader extension that I have in my browser. [[User:Brilliantnut|Brilliantnut]] ([[User talk:Brilliantnut|talk]]) 12:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
From hearing people on reddit comment about not being able to completely fill the text box (not just the visual box) with the error &amp;quot;Answer too long&amp;quot;, it's caused by a 10k character limit. Presumably by Google Docs. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.192|108.162.249.192]] 13:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we get a note on the title text? Something about the [[1493]]-like vacuousness of &amp;quot;Big Data for a Big Planet&amp;quot;. Also, I added a defn for &amp;quot;revergent&amp;quot;; future researchers, anyone who knows that one is probably a fern biologist. [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 20:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just did a bit on the title text, but I don't think that I did the best job at explaining it, so someone should look over what I did.[[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 23:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Validation&lt;br /&gt;
The validation choices are interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Enter a number between 1 and 100&amp;quot; rejects numbers outside this range (e.g. -1) but also reject valid responses (e.g. &amp;amp;pi;).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Enter your age&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Enter the number of $SIBLING&amp;quot; accept invalid responses such as -1. [[User:Paddles|Paddles]] ([[User talk:Paddles|talk]]) 13:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I (with ''fairly'' honest intention) tried to give non-numeric answers to the two Think Of A Number questions and my the age one (honestly, I had to actually think about that one, for a moment) and found them restricted to numbers only.  So obviously Randall's not ''so'' subversive as to allow free text.  (BTW, I've ''only'' driven 'stick shift', though an old friend of mine has just gotten an automatic, I think for the first time, which said was rather posh of him.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.108|141.101.99.108]] 15:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I used an HTML inspector tool to create a unique response to one of the radio button questions. The form claimed to submit successfully; it should be obvious in the results if it worked. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 16:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Identification&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;it's possible that someone may be able to identify you by looking at your responses&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Then why send those informations to Google ? I find the idea of thee survey interesting but why Google doc ? There are other options like Lime Survey. [[User:Seipas|Seipas]] ([[User talk:Seipas|talk]]) 13:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Given the stated intention to make the collected dataset available publicly, there's no information-security reason to prefer another survey tool over Google. [[User:Paddles|Paddles]] ([[User talk:Paddles|talk]]) 14:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Technically Google could de-anonymize the data if you're logged in or otherwise identifiable when submitting the survey. When Randall publishes the data set it can be completely anonymized. Not that I care if Google knows I claim to consider myself half-cat, half-person. [[User:Jestempies|Jestempies]] ([[User talk:Jestempies|talk]]) 21:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Not a transcript&lt;br /&gt;
This is mildly interesting, but it is not a transcript. Transcripts are meant mainly for blind people and search engines. Different letter sizes and a frame are not needed. [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 12:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center; border:1pt black solid;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|| Introducing &amp;lt;p style=&amp;quot;font-size:large; margin:0px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; '''THE XKCD SURVEY''' &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt; A search for weird correlations &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Note: This survey is anonymous, but &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt; all responses will be posted publicly &amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; so people can play with the data. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; '''Click here to''' &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; '''take the survey''' &amp;lt;p style=&amp;quot;font-size:x-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Or click here, or here. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; The whole comic is a link, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; because I still haven't gotten &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; the hang of HTML imagemaps. &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
::The transcript is not only for blind people. And an enhanced layout doesn't harm them but instead it would help them. A speech synthesizer would tell them something like &amp;quot;headline&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;small text at bottom&amp;quot; so that the impaired people would get a much better feeling of the comic. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many people included &amp;quot;battery, horse, staple, correct&amp;quot; in the five random words box. {{unsigned ip|173.245.56.64}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I typed ');drop table survey; -- at the end of the random characters text box.  I must have been the first person to think of that because the survey was still working. [[User:Jeremyp|Jeremyp]] ([[User talk:Jeremyp|talk]]) 13:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I typed &amp;quot;cat, cat, cat, cat, cat&amp;quot; in random words and &amp;quot;lion, cat, dog, horse, '''''lettuce'''''&amp;quot; for the random animals. Yes, I was trolling. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.150|108.162.221.150]] 06:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wish it was funny. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.148|108.162.241.148]] 16:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Tables Vs Bulleted List&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list of questions and possible responses has been added to the explanation by myself and xhfz, in different formats. I went for a wikitable, xhfz used a bulleted list. Rather than just overwrite each other, I think we need to have a discussion on which is the best choice. The reasons I believe a wikitable is the best option:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Far better expandability, in anticipation of survey results&lt;br /&gt;
:*More structured and neater presentation&lt;br /&gt;
In general I tend to lean towards tables, but it is probably a constructive discussion to have for the wiki as a whole. I would be interested to hear opinions of bulleted list vs tables in these types of situation.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 13:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we have a table we need colspan instead of rowspan. On the other hand a table is very difficult to maintain. In addition, the table didn't have space for explanations (another column, maybe). [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 13:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you used colspan, questions like &amp;quot;How many of these 20 words do you know&amp;quot; would be excessively wide. Perhaps a combination of colspan and rowspan, or simply a single cell with the responses listed as comma seperated list. As far as adding a column for explanations, its pretty trivial. What I'm getting at is that perhaps the format of a table would need to be optimised, but that is entirely feasible.&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with you as far as tables being more intimidating to edit and maintain, but once set up they aren't that bad.&lt;br /&gt;
:Bulleted lists (to me at least) look messy, and tend to lack a coherent structure. As more information is added, sub-levels and sub-sub-levels are added without much thought as to the overall intent. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By colspan I mean this:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Question&lt;br /&gt;
!Possible Answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|When you think about stuff on the internet, where do you picture it being physically located? Even if you know it's not really how things work, is there a place you imagine websites and social media posts sitting before you look at them? If so, where is it?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|''Multi-line text box'' &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Which of these words do you know the meaning of? &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Slickle &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Rife &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Soliloquy &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Fination &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Stipple &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Peristeronic &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Modicum &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Trephony &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Tribution &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Have you ever thrown out all your different pairs of socks/underwear, bought a bunch of replacements that were all one kind, and then told all your friends how great it was and how they should do it too? &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|No &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|I did the throwing out thing, but didn't talk to everyone about it &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|No, but I'm totally doing that now &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 14:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Yeah, if someone just did that, that would be great. [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 18:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Missing questions&lt;br /&gt;
Something notably missing which would have greatly helped later analysis was a question about where someone is - Country and/or State. Some of the questions and answers will be differently understood because of that (eg meaning if 'sandwich') --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.65|141.101.98.65]] 14:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that is the whole point though, to provide a data set that actively attempts to ''prevent'' the obvious simple analysis. There are plenty of statistics on how people from place A are more likely to do thing B. What I want to know is &amp;quot;How many people who would class a taco as a sandwich and can drive stick shift are able to juggle?&amp;quot;. Also, is it true that most people think they are above average drivers? --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're actually curious about those questions, the answers are &amp;quot;0&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot;. No one classes a taco as a sandwich. The only thing that this data set will provide is how many sandwich-&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;trolls&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; ''claim'' to be able to drive stick shifts and juggle.--[[User:Antipudder|Antipudder]] ([[User talk:Talk/talk/talk|talk]]) 15:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Subsections were added for ease of editing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can delete the subsections later. [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 15:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I agree on that. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;I think we shouldn't force the reader to go to Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added explanations in &amp;quot;Activities&amp;quot; and twice they were deleted. Why? [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1572:_xkcd_Survey&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=100879] [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1572%3A_xkcd_Survey&amp;amp;diff=100921&amp;amp;oldid=100920] [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 15:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I think those activities are so easily understood, that adding an &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; is not necessary. I think wiki links are sufficient, so that if somehow people don't know what the activities are, they can go look. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I know 20,000 words in [http://testyourvocab.com testyourvocab.com]. I also know soliloquy, modicum, amiable and salient. I had never heard of dunk, sheet bend, bowline, or stick shift, but I know the meaning of manual transmission without going to Wikipedia. [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 15:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::For the record, it wasn't me who deleted the explanations. The fact that Randall included those words in his survey without any explanation shows that they are fairly common words. In the context of the question, the meaning becomes clearer (Tie a sheet bend or bowline = its very likely those are knots), and if people still don't know, they can click on the wiki link. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 16:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::From a different perspective, I ''understand'' a number of the words and terms, even though they aren't the ones I'd use, locally.  i.e. gas/petrol, stick-shift/gears, cell phone/mobile phone, soda/pop (and where would cordial, to be diluted with water, sit in that list of drinks..? either way, I chose &amp;quot;fruit juice&amp;quot; so maybe that covers it).  Also I think I would call an &amp;quot;open-faced sandwich&amp;quot; a {{w|Sm%C3%B6rg%C3%A5sbord|'Smorgasbord'}}, but that seems to be a childhood misunderstanding of what the scandinavian term actually represents (the whole buffet, not any individual item bread-and-topping construct that you end up with on your platter).  &amp;quot;Condiments&amp;quot; obviously means something differently, too.  For me that's the likes of salt, pepper and vinegar - along with other chopped herbs at a push - but from context it sounds like it includes dips such as mayonnaise, and/or sauces like ketchup/brown/tartar. A different world, truly! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.108|141.101.99.108]] 17:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's a poorly worded question to which people in some countries would answer the opposite of that intended because of the way the question is worded. Very few cars run on gas (a friend's van runs on LPG), but many use petrol or diesel. [[Special:Contributions/198.41.239.32|198.41.239.32]] 05:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Fellow Brits?  No, IP of the latter appears to be Arizona (or at least the ISP, in Phoenix).  Strange.  Anyway, thanks to copious imports of 'Merkin TV and film, it'd be obvious to most(/all?) people I know that gas(olene) would be the common word in the US for the fuel that I'd call petrol(eum).  Or so I was under the impression of, until now.  Of course there is ''actual'' gas (modern LPG or [https://www.pinterest.com/pin/155585362099248762/ wartime contingencies]) but so far liquid hydrocarbons seem to still be king, inclusive of DERV. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 07:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I changed them to Wikipedia links because it seemed neater, uses the hypertext features of HTML for the reason they were intended, and seemed more in line with general style here. No-one is forced to go to Wikipedia, but providing useful hyperlinks instead of having to explain everything inline is generally considered A Good Thing &amp;amp;tm;. It wasn't intended as a personal affront. This is a wiki - we can all edit to make things (hopefully) a bit better. [[User:Paddles|Paddles]] ([[User talk:Paddles|talk]]) 12:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Can we access the results now?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are the contents available at a known URL? I use Google Docs but have never done a survey before...[[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.24|141.101.105.24]] 06:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Maple syrup&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current article comments that the &amp;quot;Maple syrup&amp;quot; option to the ''any that you drink'' question is a joke. Are you sure? I have met several people (to clarify, adults, I'm not even considering children) who drink straight maple syrup, and many times more who pour maple syrup into their drinks (notably coffee, tea, and milk are the most common I see people pour it into). There are webpages devoted to maple syrup drink recipes (alcoholic and non-alcoholic) and people debating other people's opinions on whether maple syrup is better drunk hot, cold, or room temperature. There is a possibility that Randall was not intending this question as a joke since it seems to be &amp;quot;a thing&amp;quot; among some people. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.220.11|108.162.220.11]] 12:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was very delighted to see maple syrup under the drink options! When I started the survey with my co-workers I came to the condiments question and was explaining to them how I even drink maple syrup. So I was very giddy when I came to the drink question! Yes, I do drink maple syrup and not as a joke, usually at night and only Grade B. --[[User:R0hrshach|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach|talk]]) 15:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Regarding &amp;quot;Difficult words&amp;quot; not currently linked&lt;br /&gt;
*Trephony - Another (equally obselete) term for Trepanning.  The not listed directly on the Wikipedia page for the topic (the article uses gerund forms in discussing other names for the procedure), but the related gerund &amp;quot;trephining&amp;quot; is listed.  Cf. also Trephine, which was the actual surgical instrument used for these procedures (and for which Trephony occasionally served as an alternate spelling).&lt;br /&gt;
*Tribution appears to be the result of converting the [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tribute#Verb tribute (when used as a verb)]into a noun by use of the [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-tion#English -tion suffix].  While this is a standard form, it is also nonsense (as the nounal form is also tribute).&lt;br /&gt;
*Unitory - An obsolete spelling unitary used in mathematics, chiefly British.  Several examples appear in the of the papers of the [https://books.google.com/books?id=Wl1BAQAAMAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA5-PA27&amp;amp;lpg=RA5-PA27&amp;amp;dq=unitory+method&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=rfRKJXAJqV&amp;amp;sig=Wsr_gV7xG6Airah9Lx1M0hi-7Zc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CDsQ6AEwBmoVChMInd_R9qTbxwIVChU-Ch36IAh_#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=unitory%20method&amp;amp;f=false 1913 Imperial Education Conference] (I've linked to the instance on page 97 as an example).  You will still occasionally see this spelling in use when discussing the Unitary Method in former British Colonies.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cadine -- the french term also saw some use in English as a loanword.  Cf. [https://books.google.com/books?id=4yz-Y-_OOO0C&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=cadine&amp;amp;f=false page 146 of Volume 99 of The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle (published 1829)] for several examples.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.36|108.162.216.36]] 16:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Apricity: this appears to be an obsolete, poetic and/or pompous word to describe the sun's heat in winter. It shows up in several dictionaries from the 1700's through the Victorian era; e.g., [http://books.google.com/books?id=CFBGAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT76&amp;amp;dq=apricity#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=apricity&amp;amp;f=false Bailey 1775] - Anonymous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we move the survey section to a different page (e.g. [[1572: xkcd Survey/Survey]])? It takes up most of the current page. {{User:17jiangz1/signature|13:10, 04 September 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
:The survey section is a transcript, so I moved it appropriately for now. {{User:17jiangz1/signature|13:14, 04 September 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
::The survey is not a transcript. And even if it was it is not the comic and should thus not be listed as part of this comics transcript. But the survey section is used to explain the survey and this is certainly not supposed to happen in a transcript. I have moved it above the transcript again. But it could be an idea to make separate survey page and link to it from the comic page. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If one is free to skip any question, how does the survey distinguish between a skiped question and a question for which the answer is nothing, e.g. if one does not dislike any named beverage? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.241|162.158.90.241]] 11:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Difficult words]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have access to a good bio-org chemistry reference?  I seem to remember &amp;quot;-fination&amp;quot; as a valid suffix for O-Chem usage for fixation of certain kinds of reactions (ex. Pearson ole-fination), but I don't remember if there is a general meaning of the term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;HTML image maps&lt;br /&gt;
As a web designer, I'm certain that a big part of the joke is that almost no one uses image maps anymore -- the technique of cutting up images and laying them out using CSS or HTML tables (the latter now mostly obsolete) won out back in the 90s. The trouble you have to go to to create an image map is nowhere near worth the payoff. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.91|199.27.128.91]] 21:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>199.27.128.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1472:_Geography&amp;diff=82492</id>
		<title>Talk:1472: Geography</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1472:_Geography&amp;diff=82492"/>
				<updated>2015-01-12T08:10:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;199.27.128.91: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Anybody notice that he drew an isthmus but didn't label it? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.94|108.162.221.94]] 05:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does Randall play Dwarf Fortress? Because the perfect map to build your fort on looks about like this. Volcano near the sea is especially neat luxury. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.121|141.101.80.121]] 06:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would be nice if there could be an example of the sort of map that Randall is referring to from a textbook for people who've never seen them or don't remember.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>199.27.128.91</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Footnote&amp;diff=59446</id>
		<title>Footnote</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Footnote&amp;diff=59446"/>
				<updated>2014-02-05T14:49:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;199.27.128.91: add info about the bitcoin address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The footnote/tiny print at the bottom of xkcd.com pages reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 BTC 1NfBXWqseXc9rCBc3Cbbu6HjxYssFUgkH6&lt;br /&gt;
 We did not invent the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
 The algorithm consistently finds Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisnoessel/455335731/ The algorithm killed Jeeves. ]&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.flickr.com/photos/omargutierrez/444552272/ The algorithm is banned in China.]&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.flickr.com/photos/19873723@N00/451996056/ The algorithm is from Jersey.]&lt;br /&gt;
 [http://www.flickr.com/photos/thejof/453596732/ The algorithm constantly finds Jesus.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the following one added by Randall:&lt;br /&gt;
 This is not the algorithm. This is close.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was added by [[Randall]] in April 2007, according to his [http://blog.xkcd.com/2007/04/19/billboards/ Blog] as a response to [http://web.archive.org/web/20070601192105/http://valleywag.com/tech/mystery-billboards/asks-advertising-campaign-249274.php random billboards] appearing in the New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco areas. It turned out these were a viral marketing campaign by the ask(jeeves) search engine to drive publicity around their new search algorithm.  The campaign is long over, but Randall keeps the text there as a self referential advertising campaign.  Specifically, people who find the small text will use a search engine to see what it means and the search engine will likely lead them back to [[xkcd]] &amp;amp;mdash; where they saw the text initially.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[BTC]] means {{w|bitcoin}}. The string of alphanumeric numbers is his bitcoin address.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Meta]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>199.27.128.91</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>