<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=76.133.66.138</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=76.133.66.138"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138"/>
		<updated>2026-04-14T17:23:33Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410234</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410234"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T03:59:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;76.133.66.138: Movie frame countdown&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>76.133.66.138</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>