explain xkcd - User contributions [en]

Talk:1443: Language Nerd

2014-11-06T04:03:27Z

ArtDuck:

I got edit-conflicted (not a problem), but if someone wants to consider canibalising/correcting my own intended contribution, and then completely delete this comment (please!), here's what it was:
:The English language (and others) can be, and often is, treated quite fluidly with regard to certain word forms. For example "medalled"  has been coined as the act of "having gained a medal" in a sporting competition. (Not to be confused with "meddled".) "Verbed" (i.e. to have made a non-verb form into a verb form) is a more long-standing example which is used in this comic without any form of meta-reference  and has perhaps gained greater acceptance, already, even amongst those who might decry the other neologism.
:In the comic, "legit" has been newly created as an adverb, possibly from the adjective "legitimate" (confusingly, since "legitimately" already exists as a usable adverb), "adverb" has been 'verbed' into "adverbed" and it is also pointed out that the noun clause "language nerd" has been used in an adjectival context, i.e. "adjectived".
And I had also made the edit summary say "It's probably infinitely improvable, but I've stop-gapped an initial explanation and commentified some additionalifications you might have some usiness for.", but that's probably no use to anyone. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 08:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Indubitably. [[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 14:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I wonder if this is also an homage to the [http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2013/01/28 Calvin and Hobbes] comic where Calvin likes to "verb" words.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.55|108.162.216.55]] 14:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
:"Verbing words weirds language" came to mind when I read today's comic, but I'd forgotten the source - thanks for that! [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 01:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
:This is definitely a reference to the Calvin and Hobbes strip. "Verbing weirds language" is a famous phrase among linguists. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.200|173.245.56.200]] 03:08, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

What group who "might decry the other neologism[s]" accepts "verbed"? [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 17:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm slightly confused about the "adjectived language nerd" claim - can someone clarify or chime in with their opinion? If "language nerd" is describing "go," (i.e. describing the way in which he/she "[went] on you," wouldn't you say that it was actually being adverbed (as with legit)? Or should at be interpreted as describing he/she themself, in which case I guess adjectived is correct? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.157|173.245.56.157]] 18:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:"Go (adjective)" is a modular expression that does turn adjectives into adverbs, but by using "language nerd" in that spot, it implies the phrase has been "adjectived" more than it has been "adverbed" [ex grat. "go yellow", "go bad", "go rogue", etc]. [[User:ArtDuck|ArtDuck]] ([[User talk:ArtDuck|talk]]) 04:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

If you are confused about the "adjectived language nerd", I would like to point you to the discussion of this comic by linguist Geoffrey K Pullum (http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=15576) xkcd gets Pullum's stamp of approval and that is high praise indeed for linguistic matters. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.32|108.162.216.32]] 23:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Pullum is being rather lax here, probably because he likes the strip so much, and even he just says that it's "arguably accurate," which I wouldn't characterize as high praise. "Language nerd" here is functioning as a predicate noun, which Pullum calls a predicative complement and Wikipedia calls a predicative nominal or predicate nominal. So "language nerd" here isn't really an adjective, any more than "language" is an adjective, notwithstanding that it modifies "nerd." [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.200|173.245.56.200]] 03:18, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

1443: Language Nerd

2014-11-06T03:58:15Z

ArtDuck: Grammar.

{{comic
| number = 1443
| date = November 5, 2014
| title = Language Nerd
| image = language_nerd.png
| titletext = Not to go all sentence fragment on you.
}}

==Explanation==
The English language (and others) can be, and often is, treated quite fluidly with regard to certain word forms. For example "medalled" has been coined as the act of "having gained a medal" in a sporting competition. (Not to be confused with "meddled".) "Verbed" (i.e. to have made a non-verb form into a {{w|verb}} form) is a more long-standing example which is used in this comic without any form of meta-reference and has perhaps gained greater acceptance, already, even amongst those who might decry the other neologism{{Citation needed}}.

In the comic, [[Megan]] points out to [[Cueball]] how she has created new forms of existing words in the same sentence in which they were created. Firstly, the adjective "legit" (a slang abbreviation of "legitimate") has been used as an {{w|adverb}} i.e. meaning exactly the same as "legitimately". Secondly, the noun "adverb" has been used as a verb (with the past tense "adverbed") meaning the act of turning a non-adverb into an adverb. Finally, it is also pointed out that the noun phrase "language nerd" has been used in an adjectival context, i.e. "adjectived".

It is interesting that she did not mention that she verbed "verb" and "adjective".

"Not to go all sentence fragment on you" is a sentence fragment as it contains neither an explicit subject nor a predicate:
:(I do) not (mean) to go all sentence fragment on you, but...

==Transcript==
:Megan: I don't mean to go all language nerd on you, but I just legit adverbed "legit", verbed "adverb", and adjectived "language nerd".

{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
[[Category:Language]]

Talk:1338: Land Mammals

2014-10-24T22:52:42Z

ArtDuck:

Is it mass or weight? --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.119|173.245.53.119]] 06:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:It says weight. Since most land animals live on the... land, there is not much difference. I suppose if a lot of aninimals lived near a [https://xkcd.com/852/ prime pole vaulting location] it could skew the results. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.117|108.162.246.117]] 06:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
::Ton is a unit of the quantity mass, not weight. Weight is a force and forces would be measured in newtons. Hence the comic is making a mistake. One that 99% of the people do. Mass would be correct since it is a more fundamental quantity and is usually what is meant when people talk about weight. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.105|108.162.254.105]] 18:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
:::Ton is actually a unit of weight, at least assuming the comic is using the short ton (widely used in the US). 1 ton = 2000 pounds, and pounds are a unit of weight. A metric ton, tonne, and long ton are units of mass, defined as a quantity of kilograms.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.206|108.162.219.206]] 18:32, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
::::No, [[wikipedia:Pound_%28mass%29|pound]] is a unit of mass as well. The [[wikipedia:Pound_%28force%29|pound-force]] is a unit of force. One pound-force is the amount of force exerted by Earth's gravity (under certain conditions, I have no idea which) on a pound of mass.[[User:Tharkon|Tharkon]] ([[User talk:Tharkon|talk]]) 20:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
:::::Because of the "historical conflation of mass and weight", it's now more precise to use the term "pound-mass" for the unit of mass. [[User:ArtDuck|ArtDuck]] ([[User talk:ArtDuck|talk]]) 22:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

:::::No, you're all wrong. Pound is a currency. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.188|173.245.54.188]] 15:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
:::Based on his comments on the subject in a [http://what-if.xkcd.com/112/ What If comic], I strongly suspect that he doesn't care about the distinction in cases where: a) the values of the measurements are equal, and b) it's just a comic, not a research paper. [[User:Marcus Erronius|Marcus Erronius]] ([[User talk:Marcus Erronius|talk]]) 17:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm really curious, what are the other, unlabeled groupings? [http://vaclavsmil.com/the-earths-biosphere-evolution-dynamics-and-change/ Author's website] {{unsigned ip|108.162.215.46}}
:Velociraptors, I'd assume. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.180|141.101.98.180]] 09:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

<pre>
On page 186 of Smil's referenced book, there is a bar chart with the following values in millions of tons (*=not used in Randall's graphic):
elephants 0.8
horses 40
pigs 100
cattle 450
people 280
*whales 80
*all wild vertebrates 30
*all domesticated vertebrates 650
</pre> {{unsigned ip|108.162.215.46}}

I think that this graph is actually more illustrative of how much support humans need to maintain themselves (the amount of cattle is astonishing). [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]<span title="I'm an admin. I can help.">_a</span> ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 07:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:''need''? I don't think we ''need'' so much cattle. It's just that most people prefer hamburgers and steaks to beans. So, how much we ''use'' to maintain ourselves would be better. (BTW, you don't count yourself as human?) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:According to [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/canine-corner/201209/how-many-dogs-are-there-in-the-world] there are 525 million dogs, assuming 20 kg as average weight, this should give 10 squares in the diagram. I can't find reliable numbers for cats, but there are more cats than dogs, but they don't weigh as much, so their total weight could be similar to that of the dogs. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.160|108.162.254.160]] 08:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

The blob of 13 under the word Livestock may very well represent both dogs and cats. {{unsigned ip|108.162.215.46}}

;Layout of the blocks
Does anybody see a reason for the particular layout of the blocks? My first impression was a globe but obviously it doesn't correspond to any continents, etc. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.66|108.162.254.66]] 08:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
: I've been wondering myself... I do think it is a picture of something. My ideas so far: an eye, a fried egg, a cell. --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 09:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

::It may simply be something-like-a-circle of humans with the rest surrounding it. But it DOES look like a cell. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:: Could it be a sort of relationship diagram? It looks like we're in the centre, with the animals we have the closest relationships with — our pets and our food — nearest, and those we're less concerned with further away. [[User:Gidds|Gidds]] ([[User talk:Gidds|talk]]) 11:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:::Yes, the overall layout is human-centric, but that doesn't explain the intentionally lumpy and asymmetric regions. It would have been easier to place the blocks in regular shapes (circular, rectangular or otherwise) but Randall chose to do it this way. Cell with a nucleus is a reasonable guess. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 14:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
::::I think it resembles a (low resolution) globe, with humanity representing the major continent [[User:Boxy|Boxy]] ([[User talk:Boxy|talk]]) 14:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

::::I think it shows the relationship of the title text (assuming we are part of land mammals): there are about 1.2K squares in total representing a factor of 1K:1 overall. Thus the shape (resembling bacterium) is explained, the incorporation of all mammals into the shape, and the potential central location of humans (assuming most bacteria lives in our gut). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.31|108.162.219.31]] 16:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:::::I'm thinking the data points are placed using a polar coordinate system (although what the axis are I don't know, other than that being human gets you close to the center) combined with a mapping onto an x-y grid. Does that make any sense? --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 20:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:::::: I think the layout is intended to show two legged mammals in the middle and four legged surrounding it. There are not sufficient six legged mammals to make yet another circle outside the four legged circle. [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 16:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

::::::: You know of ANY six legged mammal? Any six-appendages {{w|vertebrate}} I know of is mythological creature (like {{w|pegasus}} or some {{w|dragon}}s) or non-earth origin (like {{w|List_of_alien_species_in_the_Honorverse#treecats|tree cats}} or {{w|Pandoran_biosphere|Pandora-native}}). -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

: I think we humans are afraid of the wild animals, and are huddling in the center and have either gathered the domesticated animals around us to protect us, or they have surrounded us on their own to protect us. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 07:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

: Is it just me or is that a tip view of the human skull with eyes pointing left? Perhaps something about the placement indicates where we place the importance of these species in our minds? Wild guess and all that? {{unsigned|Sean timmons}}

Don't think there is anything to the layout, other than making it fit as a evenly distributed in a circle, placing the wild species near the domesticated relatives -- my vote is to remove the layout from the incomplete tag [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 21:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

;Identifying the groups
I would love to identify specific groups. The unlabelled animals come in groups, even the wild animals, even though only *one* of those groups (elephants for some reason) has been labelled. —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 13:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
:Reason for elephant label == "This is how much/little the whole population of the largest land mammals amass to."? (Actually, given the scarcity of elephants, I'm surprised it's a full block. I suspect something else that could have been labelledsuch as "rats" would be far more.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.7|141.101.99.7]] 14:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Per the wikipeda page[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel#Distribution_and_numbers] on camels I expect that they are the blob of 3 gray squares. [[User:Mwiser|Mwiser]] ([[User talk:Mwiser|talk]]) Update: I hadn't seen the 1 billion kg == 1 million tons notation which has since appeared. I therefore added camels (and also donkeys) to the table below. [[User:Mwiser|Mwiser]] ([[User talk:Mwiser|talk]])

Non [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_SI_definitions SI] units should just die [http://xkcd.com/526/ already]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.8|108.162.241.8]] 20:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

:Is Randall's ton the metric {{w|tonne}} or the US {{w|short ton}}? -- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.65|108.162.219.65]] 22:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
::Considering that Randall is very aware of the SI confusion, I'm sure he would have made it clear if he where NOT using metric tonne - so I would say his tonne is 1,000 kg! [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

;Stab at the numbers
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Land Mammal
! population in Billions
! Average Kilograms
! Total Kilograms in Billions
! xkcd value
! Notes
|-
! Humans
| 7.2
| 70
| {{sort|00504|504}}
| 358
| as of 2013
|-
! Cattle
| 1
| 1740
| {{sort|01740|1740}}
| 520
| as of 2012
|-
! Pigs
| 1
| 350
| {{sort|00350|350}}
| 90
|
|-
! Chickens
| 19
| 1
| {{sort|00019|19}}
|
| not mammals
|-
! Goats
| 0.865
| 46
| {{sort|00039.7|39.7}}
| 39
| as of 2008... [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goat#Worldwide_goat_population_statistics src]
|-
! Sheep
| 1
| 80
| {{sort|00080|80}}
| 135
|
|-
! Elephants
| 0.000105670
| 5000
| {{sort|00000.5|0.5}}
| 1
| as of 2012 [http://www.elephantdatabase.org/preview_report/2013_africa/Loxodonta_africana/2012/Africa src]
|-
! Horses
| 0.058372106
| 500
| {{sort|00029|29}}
| 29
| as of 2006 [http://horsetalk.co.nz/2007/09/12/world-horse-population-58m/#axzz2v7dtQwJK src]
|-
! Rats
| 10
| 0.35
| {{sort|00003.5|3.5}}
| 2
| 10B is a guess
|-
! Cats
| 0.6
| 5
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| 2
|
|-
! Dogs
| 0.4
| 40
| {{sort|00016|16}}
| 6
|
|-
! Seal
| 0.022
| 200
| {{sort|00004.4|4.4}}
|
| not a land mammal
|-
! Mole
|
| 0.075
|
|
| Numbers are slightly exaggerated, but [http://what-if.xkcd.com/4 it would be nice] to have those quantities
|-
! Krill
| ?
| ?
| {{sort|00300|175-725}}
|
| Wild species with largest biomass (not a land mammal)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_krill#Biomass_and_production src]
|-
! Camel
| 0.014
| 465
| {{sort|00006.51|6.51}}
|
| As of 2010 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel src]
|-
! Donkey
| 0.04
| 160
| {{sort|00006.4|6.4}}
|
| As of 206 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donkey src] [http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CDkQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ed.ac.uk%2Fpolopoly_fs%2F1.21412!%2FfileManager%2Fdonkey%2520fact%2520sheet.pdf&ei=HO4XU6mlD4WbygGMlICoCg&usg=AFQjCNH4aPhQCgltmd0nkgxB6Zb4QU_qLw&bvm=bv.62577051,d.aWc&cad=rja mass src]
|-

|}
* 1 billion kg == 1 million tons [https://www.google.ca/search?q=convert:+1+kg+to+metric+tons src]
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heaviest_land_mammals
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_mammals_by_population
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.8|108.162.241.8]] 16:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

;Talk about the table
:uhh.... chickens aren't... mammals? (?) [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 17:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

::Apparently not. http://www.ask.com/question/are-chickens-mammals --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 03:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

:: fixed [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.8|108.162.241.8]] 19:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Where does these XKCD numbers come from? Cattle 1740? Humans 556? According to the comic there are 520 Cattle and 358 Humans (million ton). This table makes no sence in the XKCD number department. Appart from that it would be a great table to include in the comic... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

:: fixed [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.8|108.162.241.8]] 19:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Where does the average weight come from? As the human race is very young (26% below 15 years) and the cattle population has is changed very rapidly - thus there will also be many calves all the time - reducing the average weight far below that of an average adult animal ready to made in to beef... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

:: Click on the wiki links below the table and a few more clicks you will find the numbers... add direct source links if you like [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.8|108.162.241.8]] 19:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

:Maybe the seal is considered a land mammal by Randal? Only wales are really not land mamals. The link to elephant population seems only to cover African elephants not Asian... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

:Does Randall consider cattle to be all the genus Bos? Waterbuffalo for example weigh about 400kg and wikipedia claims a world population of 130M. That would be 52 blocks. So, I'd assume that since there aren't any free blocks that large, that they are considered cattle. So, then Yaks and Wildebeests should be considered cattle as well, no? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.36|108.162.215.36]] 22:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)rbnm

::Sorry I meant Tribe Bovini not genus Bos [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.36|108.162.215.36]]rbnm

:Rodentia? If the average rodent weighs something like 0.67kg, then 15B rodents would make up 13 squares. 0.67kg comes from the log average of the smallest and largest. If this includes rats (4B per the WHO) - is it reasonable that the rest of Rodentia includes 11B, 1-2 rodents per person on the Earth? That would include: squirrels, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, and hamsters; although guinea pigs might be considered pet/livestock (mmm... cuye!). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.36|108.162.215.36]] 23:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)rbnm

;Title Text
The title text mentions that bacteria outweigh humans by thousands (plural) to one. The notation 1000:1 used in the explanation is therefore not correct.
:True - I did not spot that. I have corrected it to the same version as the title text[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

;Rabbit
This mammals belong to "Pets/Livestock" and "Wild animals". Any ideas where this does fit in here? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
:There are several other animals where there could be both a wild and a domesticated (or pet) version. Foes Zoo animals count as pets? Elephant is a good example as they are domesticated in India. Is domesticated only animals where we have changed them - like cows and pigs? In that case the elephant is not domesticated - as it has not been breed into a different race... {{unsigned|Kynde}}

;Deer
This belongs to "Wild animals". Any ideas where this does fit in here? --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

;Smil table
he singles out elephants in the table, and uses Mt of Carbon as a unit. The % of carbon is ~18,5% in humans (I guess this is pretty average for mnammals too, so checking the numbers should take this in to account.

Guessing the unlabeled groups is a pretty futile exercise, are yaks cattle or not, what of reindeers, are both camels and llama and alpacas marked separately. largest wild is likely though rodents, and the smallest likely all wild carnivora. odd-toeds, even-toeds, marsupials, all other mammals are some other likely groups in the 'wilds' section.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.8|108.162.212.8]] 04:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Anyone in the US want to spend a few dollars to try and clear up these unlabelled groups? The book used by Randall in creation of this comic is [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0262692988/olibro-20/ available on amazon]. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

;Revised Article Requirements

Many people have taken a significant amount of time to figure out what animals are part of what group. Clearly this is not possible without a significant amount of interpretation. I am removing this "need" so that this article can be marked completed at some point in time, preferably before the Sun burns out. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 20:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

1338: Land Mammals

2014-10-24T22:19:46Z

ArtDuck: /* References */

{{comic
| number = 1338
| date = March 5, 2014
| title = Land Mammals
| image = land_mammals.png
| titletext = Bacteria still outweigh us thousands to one--and that's not even counting the several pounds of them in your body.
}}

==Explanation==
{{incomplete|Clean up Grammar}}

This comic may be a [[Nerd Sniping|nerd snipe]] from [[Randall]], challenging his readers to figure out the missing parts.

The comic shows the total weight of mankind and all other land mammals. Only a few centuries ago, humans, their pets and livestock came to make up a great proportion of the earth's land mammal biomass. Note that only land-dwelling mammals are taken into account, so whales and other marine mammals are not included.

The design of the blocks loosely resembles a cell. This could be a reference to how these animals support humans, analogous to a cell supporting a central nucleus. Because of this it can be assumed that all the animals in this diagram (wild or domestic), in some way support human activity.

The title text states that bacteria outweigh us thousands to one, without counting the several pounds of bacteria in our body that are considered part of our own weight. The aforementioned cell could also be a bacterium, making it a possible reference to the title text. Slightly more than a thousand blocks have been used to sketch the "cell", and bacteria outweigh us by this factor.

===Weight===
Per the diagram, there are 358 million tons of humans, 864 million tons of pets and livestock, of which 520 million tons comes from cattle, and 34 million tons of wild animals; for a total of 1.3 billion tons.
The number of blocks represents the weight of the group in millions of tons = billions of kg. Note that some entries have the same number of blocks, and thus have the same rank.

====Humans====
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
Humans outweigh both sheep and put together pigs. This is surprising as these animals outweigh the population in the countries that produce the majority of meat from such animals.
====Our pets and livestock====
There are 8 distinct blocks of wild animal (elephants and 7 others). There are 13 distinct blocks of pets and live stock; only the top 5 are labeled - in order of weight they are: Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses.
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Total Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| {{sort|00520|520}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| {{sort|00135|135}}
| Sheep

|-
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| {{sort|00090|90}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| {{sort|00039|39}}
| Goats
|-
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| {{sort|00029|29}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00009|9}}
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
|}

====Wild Animals====
The elephant is the only type of wild animal to be singled out in the comic. This may possibly be due to elephants being the largest land mammal. It is interesting to note that the world's heaviest land dwelling animal, only takes up one square.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00016|16}}
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00022|22}}
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| Elephants
|-
|}

====References====
The comic references the book [http://vaclavsmil.com/the-earths-biosphere-evolution-dynamics-and-change/ The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change] by {{W|Vaclav Smil}} as the source for most of the data - a few other sources have also been used, but we're not referenced.
On page 186 of Smil's referenced book, there is a bar chart with the following values:
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! millions of tons
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|0.8}}
| Elephants
|-
| {{sort|00400|40}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|01000|100}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|04500|450}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|02800|280}}
| People
|-
| {{sort|00800|80}}
| Whales
|-
| {{sort|00300|30}}
| all wild vertebrates
|-
| {{sort|06500|650}}
| all domesticated vertebrates
|-
|}
Note that all labled non human animals are referenced in this table. Likely this is the table that was reffrenced for this comic. Only land dwelling mammals are taken into account, and thus whales, all wild vertebrates, and all domesticated vertebrates are not included in the comic.

====Unlabeled Animals====
These are guesses about the identity of the unlabeled animals
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Comic weight (Billion kg)
! Type
! Guess
! Actual Population (millions)
! Average Weight (kg)
! Estimated total weight (Billion kg)
! Explanation
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
| The largest grouping of wild animals, less than 1/50 of the weight of cattle - although representing almost a third of all the wild land mammals.
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00009|9}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Camel
| {{sort|00170|17}}
| {{sort|04120|412}}
|
| Wikipedia lists the number of camels as 17 million. An average weight, based on Wikipedia's numbers for male and female, is about 500 kg. So, including the non-adult camels, an average around 400 kg seems to be a realistic estimate.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00006|6}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Dogs
| {{sort|04000|400}}
| {{sort|00150|15}}
|
|According to Wikipedia, there are 400 million dogs worldwide. Assuming their average weight is 15 kg there should be 6 blocks.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Donkeys
| {{sort|00410|41}}
| {{sort|01220|122}}
|
| There are roughly 41 million {{w|Donkey#Present status|donkeys}} on Earth, with an average weight of about 125 kg.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00016|16}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00004|4}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Cats
| {{sort|05000|500}}
| {{sort|00040|4}}
|
| According to Wikipedia, there are 500 million domestic cats worldwide, with an average weight of 4.5 kg. So, counting kittens, 4kg is realistic.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Wild animals
| Rats
| {{sort|04000|4000}}
| {{sort|00005|0.5}}
|
|A rat in the wild {{W|Rat#Species and description|seldom weighs over 500 g}}. The {{W|World Health Organization}} estimates 4 billion rats (citation needed) and a comparable number of mice. The {{W|House mouse#Characteristics|house mouse}} weighs only about 20 g on average and mice would thus only fill 8 hundredths of a block.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
|}

==Transcript==
:'''Earth's LAND MAMMALS by weight'''

:[A block indicating the value of each block:] = 1,000,000 tons

:[Dark gray block:] Humans
:[Light gray block:] Our pets and livestock
:[Green block:] Wild animals

:[The rest of the comic consist of blocks representing the weight of mammals. Some of the blocks are labeled:]
:*Cattle
:*Pigs
:*Goats
:*Sheep
:*Elephants
:*Horses

:Data from Vaclav Smil's ''The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change'', plus a few other sources.

{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Animals]]
[[Category:Charts]]

1338: Land Mammals

2014-10-24T22:17:03Z

ArtDuck: /* Explanation */

{{comic
| number = 1338
| date = March 5, 2014
| title = Land Mammals
| image = land_mammals.png
| titletext = Bacteria still outweigh us thousands to one--and that's not even counting the several pounds of them in your body.
}}

==Explanation==
{{incomplete|Clean up Grammar}}

This comic may be a [[Nerd Sniping|nerd snipe]] from [[Randall]], challenging his readers to figure out the missing parts.

The comic shows the total weight of mankind and all other land mammals. Only a few centuries ago, humans, their pets and livestock came to make up a great proportion of the earth's land mammal biomass. Note that only land-dwelling mammals are taken into account, so whales and other marine mammals are not included.

The design of the blocks loosely resembles a cell. This could be a reference to how these animals support humans, analogous to a cell supporting a central nucleus. Because of this it can be assumed that all the animals in this diagram (wild or domestic), in some way support human activity.

The title text states that bacteria outweigh us thousands to one, without counting the several pounds of bacteria in our body that are considered part of our own weight. The aforementioned cell could also be a bacterium, making it a possible reference to the title text. Slightly more than a thousand blocks have been used to sketch the "cell", and bacteria outweigh us by this factor.

===Weight===
Per the diagram, there are 358 million tons of humans, 864 million tons of pets and livestock, of which 520 million tons comes from cattle, and 34 million tons of wild animals; for a total of 1.3 billion tons.
The number of blocks represents the weight of the group in millions of tons = billions of kg. Note that some entries have the same number of blocks, and thus have the same rank.

====Humans====
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
Humans outweigh both sheep and put together pigs. This is surprising as these animals outweigh the population in the countries that produce the majority of meat from such animals.
====Our pets and livestock====
There are 8 distinct blocks of wild animal (elephants and 7 others). There are 13 distinct blocks of pets and live stock; only the top 5 are labeled - in order of weight they are: Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses.
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Total Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| {{sort|00520|520}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| {{sort|00135|135}}
| Sheep

|-
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| {{sort|00090|90}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| {{sort|00039|39}}
| Goats
|-
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| {{sort|00029|29}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00009|9}}
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
|}

====Wild Animals====
The elephant is the only type of wild animal to be singled out in the comic. This may possibly be due to elephants being the largest land mammal. It is interesting to note that the world's heaviest land dwelling animal, only takes up one square.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00016|16}}
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00022|22}}
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| Elephants
|-
|}

====References====
The comic references the book [http://vaclavsmil.com/the-earths-biosphere-evolution-dynamics-and-change/ The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change] by {{W|Vaclav Smil}} as the source for most of the data - although a few other sources has also been used. These other sources are not referenced.
On page 186 of Smil's referenced book, there is a bar chart with the following values:
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! millions of tons
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|0.8}}
| Elephants
|-
| {{sort|00400|40}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|01000|100}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|04500|450}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|02800|280}}
| People
|-
| {{sort|00800|80}}
| Whales
|-
| {{sort|00300|30}}
| all wild vertebrates
|-
| {{sort|06500|650}}
| all domesticated vertebrates
|-
|}
Note that all labled non human animals are referenced in this table. Likely this is the table that was reffrenced for this comic. Only land dwelling mammals are taken into account, and thus whales, all wild vertebrates, and all domesticated vertebrates are not included in the comic.

====Unlabeled Animals====
These are guesses about the identity of the unlabeled animals
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Comic weight (Billion kg)
! Type
! Guess
! Actual Population (millions)
! Average Weight (kg)
! Estimated total weight (Billion kg)
! Explanation
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
| The largest grouping of wild animals, less than 1/50 of the weight of cattle - although representing almost a third of all the wild land mammals.
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00009|9}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Camel
| {{sort|00170|17}}
| {{sort|04120|412}}
|
| Wikipedia lists the number of camels as 17 million. An average weight, based on Wikipedia's numbers for male and female, is about 500 kg. So, including the non-adult camels, an average around 400 kg seems to be a realistic estimate.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00006|6}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Dogs
| {{sort|04000|400}}
| {{sort|00150|15}}
|
|According to Wikipedia, there are 400 million dogs worldwide. Assuming their average weight is 15 kg there should be 6 blocks.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Donkeys
| {{sort|00410|41}}
| {{sort|01220|122}}
|
| There are roughly 41 million {{w|Donkey#Present status|donkeys}} on Earth, with an average weight of about 125 kg.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00016|16}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00004|4}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Cats
| {{sort|05000|500}}
| {{sort|00040|4}}
|
| According to Wikipedia, there are 500 million domestic cats worldwide, with an average weight of 4.5 kg. So, counting kittens, 4kg is realistic.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Wild animals
| Rats
| {{sort|04000|4000}}
| {{sort|00005|0.5}}
|
|A rat in the wild {{W|Rat#Species and description|seldom weighs over 500 g}}. The {{W|World Health Organization}} estimates 4 billion rats (citation needed) and a comparable number of mice. The {{W|House mouse#Characteristics|house mouse}} weighs only about 20 g on average and mice would thus only fill 8 hundredths of a block.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
|}

==Transcript==
:'''Earth's LAND MAMMALS by weight'''

:[A block indicating the value of each block:] = 1,000,000 tons

:[Dark gray block:] Humans
:[Light gray block:] Our pets and livestock
:[Green block:] Wild animals

:[The rest of the comic consist of blocks representing the weight of mammals. Some of the blocks are labeled:]
:*Cattle
:*Pigs
:*Goats
:*Sheep
:*Elephants
:*Horses

:Data from Vaclav Smil's ''The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change'', plus a few other sources.

{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Animals]]
[[Category:Charts]]

1338: Land Mammals

2014-10-24T22:16:03Z

ArtDuck: /* Explanation */ Grammar.

{{comic
| number = 1338
| date = March 5, 2014
| title = Land Mammals
| image = land_mammals.png
| titletext = Bacteria still outweigh us thousands to one--and that's not even counting the several pounds of them in your body.
}}

==Explanation==
{{incomplete|Clean up Grammar}}

This comic may be a [[Nerd Sniping|nerd snipe]] from [[Randall]], challenging his readers to figure out the missing parts.

The comic shows the total weight of mankind and all other land mammals. Only a few centuries ago, humans, their pets and livestock came to make up a great proportion of the earth's land mammal biomass. Note that only land-dwelling mammals are taken into account, so whales and other marine mammals are not included.

The design of the blocks loosely resembles a cell. This could be a reference to how these animals support humans, analogous to a cell supporting a central nucleus. Because of this it can be assumed that all the animals in this diagram (wild or domestic), in some way support human activity.

The title text states that bacteria outweigh us thousands to one, without counting the several pounds of bacteria in our body that are considered part of our own weight. The aforementioned cell could also be a bacterium, making it a possible reference to the title text. Slightly more than a thousand blocks have been used to sketch the "cell", and bacteria outweigh us by this factor.

Grammar
===Weight===
Per the diagram, there are 358 million tons of humans, 864 million tons of pets and livestock, of which 520 million tons comes from cattle, and 34 million tons of wild animals; for a total of 1.3 billion tons.
The number of blocks represents the weight of the group in millions of tons = billions of kg. Note that some entries have the same number of blocks, and thus have the same rank.

====Humans====
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
Humans outweigh both sheep and put together pigs. This is surprising as these animals outweigh the population in the countries that produce the majority of meat from such animals.
====Our pets and livestock====
There are 8 distinct blocks of wild animal (elephants and 7 others). There are 13 distinct blocks of pets and live stock; only the top 5 are labeled - in order of weight they are: Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats and Horses.
Cattle, in aggregate, are much heavier than the human population.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Total Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| {{sort|00520|520}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| {{sort|00135|135}}
| Sheep

|-
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| {{sort|00090|90}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| {{sort|00039|39}}
| Goats
|-
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| {{sort|00029|29}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00009|9}}
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00013|13}}
| {{sort|00006|6}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
|}

====Wild Animals====
The elephant is the only type of wild animal to be singled out in the comic. This may possibly be due to elephants being the largest land mammal. It is interesting to note that the world's heaviest land dwelling animal, only takes up one square.
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Weight  (Billion kg)
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|8}}
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00010|10}}
| {{sort|00007|7}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00014|14}}
| {{sort|00005|5}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00016|16}}
| {{sort|00004|4}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00017|17}}
| {{sort|00003|3}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00019|19}}
| {{sort|00002|2}}
| Unlabeled
|-
| {{sort|00022|22}}
| {{sort|00001|1}}
| Elephants
|-
|}

====References====
The comic references the book [http://vaclavsmil.com/the-earths-biosphere-evolution-dynamics-and-change/ The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change] by {{W|Vaclav Smil}} as the source for most of the data - although a few other sources has also been used. These other sources are not referenced.
On page 186 of Smil's referenced book, there is a bar chart with the following values:
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! millions of tons
! Name
|-
| {{sort|00008|0.8}}
| Elephants
|-
| {{sort|00400|40}}
| Horses
|-
| {{sort|01000|100}}
| Pigs
|-
| {{sort|04500|450}}
| Cattle
|-
| {{sort|02800|280}}
| People
|-
| {{sort|00800|80}}
| Whales
|-
| {{sort|00300|30}}
| all wild vertebrates
|-
| {{sort|06500|650}}
| all domesticated vertebrates
|-
|}
Note that all labled non human animals are referenced in this table. Likely this is the table that was reffrenced for this comic. Only land dwelling mammals are taken into account, and thus whales, all wild vertebrates, and all domesticated vertebrates are not included in the comic.

====Unlabeled Animals====
These are guesses about the identity of the unlabeled animals
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: auto; text-align: center; font-size: 95%; table-layout: fixed; line-height:1.25"
|-
! Rank
! Comic weight (Billion kg)
! Type
! Guess
! Actual Population (millions)
! Average Weight (kg)
! Estimated total weight (Billion kg)
! Explanation
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
| The largest grouping of wild animals, less than 1/50 of the weight of cattle - although representing almost a third of all the wild land mammals.
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00009|9}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00008|8}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Camel
| {{sort|00170|17}}
| {{sort|04120|412}}
|
| Wikipedia lists the number of camels as 17 million. An average weight, based on Wikipedia's numbers for male and female, is about 500 kg. So, including the non-adult camels, an average around 400 kg seems to be a realistic estimate.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00010|10}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00007|7}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00013|13}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00006|6}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Dogs
| {{sort|04000|400}}
| {{sort|00150|15}}
|
|According to Wikipedia, there are 400 million dogs worldwide. Assuming their average weight is 15 kg there should be 6 blocks.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Donkeys
| {{sort|00410|41}}
| {{sort|01220|122}}
|
| There are roughly 41 million {{w|Donkey#Present status|donkeys}} on Earth, with an average weight of about 125 kg.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00014|14}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00005|5}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00016|16}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00004|4}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Pets/Livestock
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00017|17}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00003|3}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Pets/Livestock
| Cats
| {{sort|05000|500}}
| {{sort|00040|4}}
|
| According to Wikipedia, there are 500 million domestic cats worldwide, with an average weight of 4.5 kg. So, counting kittens, 4kg is realistic.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="1" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="1" |Wild animals
|
|
|
|
|
|-
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00019|19}}
| rowspan="2" |{{sort|00002|2}}
| rowspan="2" |Wild animals
| Rats
| {{sort|04000|4000}}
| {{sort|00005|0.5}}
|
|A rat in the wild {{W|Rat#Species and description|seldom weighs over 500 g}}. The {{W|World Health Organization}} estimates 4 billion rats (citation needed) and a comparable number of mice. The {{W|House mouse#Characteristics|house mouse}} weighs only about 20 g on average and mice would thus only fill 8 hundredths of a block.
|-
|  
|
|
|
|
|-
|}

==Transcript==
:'''Earth's LAND MAMMALS by weight'''

:[A block indicating the value of each block:] = 1,000,000 tons

:[Dark gray block:] Humans
:[Light gray block:] Our pets and livestock
:[Green block:] Wild animals

:[The rest of the comic consist of blocks representing the weight of mammals. Some of the blocks are labeled:]
:*Cattle
:*Pigs
:*Goats
:*Sheep
:*Elephants
:*Horses

:Data from Vaclav Smil's ''The Earth's Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change'', plus a few other sources.

{{comic discussion}}
[[Category:Animals]]
[[Category:Charts]]