<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BradleyRoss</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BradleyRoss"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/BradleyRoss"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T04:25:56Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306657</id>
		<title>Talk:1132: Frequentists vs. Bayesians</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306657"/>
				<updated>2023-02-23T01:32:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Names such as Bayesian can be associated with multiple concepts.  Turing used as example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just sort of assumed he bet 50 dollars because if the sun had exploded, they'd be dead and therefore wouldn't need the machine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.16|108.162.237.16]] 07:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Something should be added about the prior probability of the sun going nova, as that is the primary substantive point. &amp;quot;The neutrino detector is evidence that the Sun has exploded. It's showing an observation which is 35 times more likely to appear if the Sun has exploded than if it hasn't (likelihood ratio of 35:1). The Bayesian just doesn't think that's strong enough evidence to overcome the prior odds, i.e., after multiplying the prior odds by 35 they still aren't very high.&amp;quot; - http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/fe5/xkcd_frequentist_vs_bayesians/ [[Special:Contributions/209.65.52.92|209.65.52.92]] 23:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: taking that bet would be a mistake. If the Bayesian is right, you're out $50. If he's wrong, everyone is about to die and you'll never get to spend the winnings. Of course, this meta-analysis is itself a type of Bayesian thinking, so [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dunning-kruger+effect Dunning-Kruger Effect] would apply. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 13:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: You don't think you could spend fifty bucks in eight minutes? ;-)  (PS: wikipedia is probably a better link than lmgtfy: {{w|Dunning-Kruger effect}}) -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has referenced the Labyrinth guards before: [http://xkcd.com/246/ xkcd 246:Labyrinth puzzle]. Plus he has satirized p&amp;lt;0.05 in [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=882:_Significant xkcd 882:Significant]--[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 15:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bit of maths. Let event N be the sun going nova and event Y be the detector giving the answer &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;. The detector has already given a positive answer so we want to compute P(N|Y). Applying the Bayes' theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) = 1&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N) = 0.0000....&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) * P(N) = 0.0000...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = p(Y|N)*P(N) + P(Y|-N)*P(-N)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|-N) = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(-N) = 0.999999...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = 0 + 1/36 = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = 0 / (1/36) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
Quite likely it's not entirely correct. [[User:Lmpk|Lmpk]] ([[User talk:Lmpk|talk]]) 16:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what I get for the application of Bayes' Theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y): = P(Y|N) * P(N) / [P(Y|N) * P(N) + P(Y|~N) * P(~N)]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35/36 * P(N) / [35/36 * P(N) + 1/36 * (1 - P(N))]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * P(N) / [35 * P(N) - P(N) + 1]&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt; 35 * P(N)&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * (really small number)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you believe it's extremely unlikely for the sun to go nova, then you should also believe it's unlikely a Yes answer is true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't say the comic is about election prediction models. It's about a long-standing dispute between two different schools of statisticians, a dispute that began before Nate Silver was born. It's possible that the recent media attention for Silver and his ilk inspired this subject, but it's the kind of geeky issue Randall would typically take on in other circumstances too. [[User:MGK|MGK]] ([[User talk:MGK|talk]]) 19:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree - this is not directed at the US-presidential election. I also want to add, that Bayesian btatistics assumes that parameters of distributions (e.g. mean of gaussian) are also random variables. These random variables have prior distributions - in this case p(sun explodes). The Bayesian statistitian in this comic has access to this prior distribution and so has other estimates for an error of the neutrino detector. The knowlege of the prior distribution is somewhat considered a &amp;quot;black art&amp;quot; by other statisticians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal interpretation of the &amp;quot;bet you $50 it hasn't&amp;quot; reply is in the case of the sun going nova, no one would be alive to ask the neutrino detector, the probability of the sun going nova is always 0. [[User:Paps|Paps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, you would be able to ask. While neutrinos move almost at speed of light, the plasma of the explosion is significally slower, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova 10% of speed of light tops]. You will have more that hour to ask. (Note that technically, sun can't go [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova nova], because nova is white dwarf with external source of hydrogen. It can (and will), however, go supernova, which I assume is what Randall means.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Our sun will not go supernova, as it has insufficient mass.  It will slowly become hotter, rendering Earth uninhabitable in a few billion years.  In about 5 billion years it will puff up into a red giant, swallowing the inner planets.  After that, it will gradually blow off its lighter gasses, eventually leaving behind the core, a white dwarf. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.38.245|50.0.38.245]] 01:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please don't edit others' comments on talk pages; it's considered quite rude. On a talk page, discourse is meant to be conducted, by editors for the betterment of the article. For constructive discourse to occur, a person's words must be left in tact. The act of censorship hurts the common goal of betterment. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments Wikipedia], the authoritative source on how a wiki works best: &amp;quot;you ''should not'' edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.&amp;quot; [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  17:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Note: much of this conversation has been removed at the request of the authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the explanation is wrong or otherwise lacking in its explanation: The P-value is not the entire problem with the frequentist's viewpoint (or alternatively, the problem with the p-value hasn't been explained). The Frequentist has looked strictly at a two case scenario: Either the machine rolls 6-6 and is lying, or it doesn't rolls 6-6 and it is telling the truth. Therefore, there is a 35/36 probability (97.22%) that the machine is telling the truth and therefore the sun has exploded. The Bayesian is factoring in outside facts and information to improve the accuracy of the probability model. He says &amp;quot;Either the machine rolls 6-6 (a 1/36 probability, or 2.77%) or the sun has exploded (an aparently far less likely scenario). Given the comparison, the Bayesian believes it is MORE probable that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded, given the relative probabilities. If the latter is a 1 in a million chance (0.000001%), it is 2,777,777 times more likely that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded.&lt;br /&gt;
To borrow a demonstration/explanation technique from the Monty Hall problem, if the machine told you a coin flip was heads, that would be 50% chance of occuring while a 2.7% chance of the machine lying, the probabilities would clearly suggest that the machine was more likely to be telling the truth. Whereas if the machine said that 100 coin flips had all come up heads (7.88x10^-31%). Is it more likely that 100 coin flips all came up heads or is it more likely the machine is lying? What about 1000 coin flips? or 1,000,000? I think the question is, whether one could assign a probability to the sun exploding. Also, I think they could have avoided the whole thing by asking the machine a second time and see what it answered. [[User:TheHYPO|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO|talk]]) 19:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source of explanation: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/43339/whats-wrong-with-xkcds-frequentists-vs-bayesians-comic --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 20:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The P-value really has nothing to do with it.  If I think that there is a 35/36 chance that the sun has exploded, then I should we willing to take any bet that the sun has exploded with better than 1:35 odds.  For example, if someone bets me that the sun has exploded in which they will pay me $2 if the sun has exploded and I will pay them $35 if it hasn't, then based on my belief that the sun has exploded with 35/36 probability, then my expected value for this bet is 2*35/36 - 35 * 1/36 = 35/36 dollars and I will take this bet.  Clearly I would also take a bet with 1:1 odds - my estimated expected value in the proposed bet in the comic would be 50*35/36 - 50 * 1/36 = $49 (approximately), and I would for sure take this bet.  The Bayesian on the other hand has a much lower belief that the sun has exploded because he takes into account the prior probability of the sun exploding, so he would take the reverse side of the bet.  The difference is that the Bayesian uses prior probabilities in computing his belief in an event, whereas frequentists do not believe that you can put prior probabilities on events in the real world.  Also note that this comic has nothing to do with whether people would die if the sun went nova - the comic is titled &amp;quot;Frequentists vs Bayesians&amp;quot; and is about the difference between these two approaches. {{unsigned|171.64.68.120}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Labyrinth reference reminds me of an old Doctor Who episode (Pyramid of Mars), where the Doctor is also faced with a truthful and untruthful set of guards. Summarized here: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Pyramids_of_Mars_(TV_story) [[User:Fermax|Fermax]] ([[User talk:Fermax|talk]]) 04:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually an example of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy Base rate fallacy]. --[[Special:Contributions/71.199.125.210|71.199.125.210]] 04:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People have gone over this already, but just to be a bit more explicit:&lt;br /&gt;
Let NOVA be the event that there was a nova, and let YES be the event that the detector responds &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; to the question &amp;quot;Did the sun go nova?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
What we want is P(NOVA|YES)=P(YES|NOVA)*P(NOVA)/P(YES)&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose P(NOVA)=p is the prior probability of a nova.&lt;br /&gt;
Then P(YES|NOVA)=35/36, P(NOVA)=p, and P(YES)=p*35/36+(1-p)*1/36=1/36+34/36&lt;br /&gt;
So then P(NOVA|YES)=35p/(1+34p). If p is small, then P(NOVA|YES) is also small. In particular, the Bayesian statistician wins his bet at 1:1 odds if p&amp;lt;1/36, which is probably the case.&lt;br /&gt;
If the Bayesian statistician wants 95% confidence that he'll win his bet, then he needs p&amp;lt;1/666. =P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's cute to attempt to connect this to the U.S. presidential election, but it's far likelier that it's a reference to Enrico Fermi taking bets at the Trinity test site as to whether or not the first atomic bomb would cause a chain reaction that would ignite the entire atmosphere and destroy the planet.  I'll bet you $50 it is.  [[Special:Contributions/71.229.88.206|71.229.88.206]] 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't like the explanation at all. Some of the discussion posts give a good view on this. I'd like to share my thought about the last panel, though. The page reads as if the punch line is about the fact that you cannot spend the money if the sun was going to explode; but why does the bayesian propose this bet and not the frequentist - no reason for this. I think there is a better explanation for this panel: there are several proofs that bayesian probabilities result in &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; behaviour: They state that if you act according to bayes' rule you cannot be cheated in betting. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.179|108.162.254.179]] 17:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last panel may refer to Nate Sliver's view expressed in his book {{w|The Signal and the Noise}} that if one believes one's prediction to be true one should be confident to bet on it. --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 18:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please excuse my ignorance, but how is two sixes rolled on fair dice 31/32?  (In the explanation: &amp;quot;the detector is telling the truth (31 in 32)&amp;quot;) --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just a missreading, not stupid. The detector is telling the truth when you dont role 2 sixes. roling 2 sixes is 1/6 * 1/6 or 1/36. So not roling is 35 in 36, wait oops 36 not 32, thanks. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 17:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have always thought that the suggested Bet is also a reference to the Dutch Book argument for judging and accounting for probabilities underlying Bayesian interpretations of probability theory. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.100|141.101.98.100]] 22:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The likelyhood of a solar explosion may be wrong.  Since the detector I'd only used at night, the event is twice as likely to occur than listed.  That said, there's a 50% chance of the event never being detected, so I'm not sure.  Any one more knowledgeable than I care to comment? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh. I thought that the last panel was pragmatism: &amp;quot;If the sun goes nova, $50 doesn't matter; I'll be dead. If the sun hasn't, I get $50!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Same, but sign your comments, [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 14:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic hurts my head. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.7|173.245.54.7]] 21:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my feeling that sloppy or machiavellian academics have come to use the term &amp;quot;Bayesian&amp;quot; to mean something more like &amp;quot;we adjusted it to what we felt was most reasonable&amp;quot;, which introduces so much bias that it actually leaves one unable to determine the scientific validity of the results. I was reading [https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/3/619/224216 a publication], today, that made me think of that and look up this comic. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 21:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a statistical angle I'm missing to the final part of the mouseover text 'did your brain fall out? [roll] yes...' Or is is purely linguistic between literal and figurative i.e. if his brain has fallen out as in he has made a careless error, then that's true. If it's literally did his brain fall out, is the 'yes' the 97% chance that it's talking about his mistake, or the ~3% chance that it's lying about the literal truth? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.244|172.69.69.244]] 14:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per Sagan, &amp;quot;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.54|108.162.229.54]] 10:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he Bayesian  says &amp;quot;Bet you $50 it hasn't.&amp;quot;, he is saying that he will probably win the bet.  However, he isn't saying he knows whether the sun has exploded or whether the detector is lying.   What he is saying is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;If we are playing Texas Holdem and I have a royal flush while you have nothing showing, I am probably going to win and might as well bet what I can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the eventist says &amp;quot;Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether I would say the sun had exploded&amp;quot;, the Bayesian doesn't know what the detector would say.  (I am changing the wording slightly, but it doesn't make sense to me as stated.)  Therefore, the Bayesian can't give an answer.  The Bayesian's answer would therefore be &amp;quot;I am a neutrino detector (answers are sometimes true and sometimes false), not a labyrinth guard (answers are always true or  always false)&amp;quot;.  He then predicts that the Bayesian would say &amp;quot;Seriously, did your brain fall out?&amp;quot;  After somebody hits the button, the detector answers truthfully (the likeliest option), and gives his opinion &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot;. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 01:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to Bayesian having multiple meanings, this is probably similar to there being a Turing test, a Turing machine, and Turing Complete. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 01:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306656</id>
		<title>Talk:1132: Frequentists vs. Bayesians</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306656"/>
				<updated>2023-02-23T01:31:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Names such as Bayesian can be associated with multiple concepts.  Turing used as example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just sort of assumed he bet 50 dollars because if the sun had exploded, they'd be dead and therefore wouldn't need the machine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.16|108.162.237.16]] 07:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Something should be added about the prior probability of the sun going nova, as that is the primary substantive point. &amp;quot;The neutrino detector is evidence that the Sun has exploded. It's showing an observation which is 35 times more likely to appear if the Sun has exploded than if it hasn't (likelihood ratio of 35:1). The Bayesian just doesn't think that's strong enough evidence to overcome the prior odds, i.e., after multiplying the prior odds by 35 they still aren't very high.&amp;quot; - http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/fe5/xkcd_frequentist_vs_bayesians/ [[Special:Contributions/209.65.52.92|209.65.52.92]] 23:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: taking that bet would be a mistake. If the Bayesian is right, you're out $50. If he's wrong, everyone is about to die and you'll never get to spend the winnings. Of course, this meta-analysis is itself a type of Bayesian thinking, so [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dunning-kruger+effect Dunning-Kruger Effect] would apply. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 13:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: You don't think you could spend fifty bucks in eight minutes? ;-)  (PS: wikipedia is probably a better link than lmgtfy: {{w|Dunning-Kruger effect}}) -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has referenced the Labyrinth guards before: [http://xkcd.com/246/ xkcd 246:Labyrinth puzzle]. Plus he has satirized p&amp;lt;0.05 in [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=882:_Significant xkcd 882:Significant]--[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 15:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bit of maths. Let event N be the sun going nova and event Y be the detector giving the answer &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;. The detector has already given a positive answer so we want to compute P(N|Y). Applying the Bayes' theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) = 1&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N) = 0.0000....&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) * P(N) = 0.0000...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = p(Y|N)*P(N) + P(Y|-N)*P(-N)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|-N) = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(-N) = 0.999999...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = 0 + 1/36 = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = 0 / (1/36) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
Quite likely it's not entirely correct. [[User:Lmpk|Lmpk]] ([[User talk:Lmpk|talk]]) 16:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what I get for the application of Bayes' Theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y): = P(Y|N) * P(N) / [P(Y|N) * P(N) + P(Y|~N) * P(~N)]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35/36 * P(N) / [35/36 * P(N) + 1/36 * (1 - P(N))]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * P(N) / [35 * P(N) - P(N) + 1]&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt; 35 * P(N)&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * (really small number)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you believe it's extremely unlikely for the sun to go nova, then you should also believe it's unlikely a Yes answer is true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't say the comic is about election prediction models. It's about a long-standing dispute between two different schools of statisticians, a dispute that began before Nate Silver was born. It's possible that the recent media attention for Silver and his ilk inspired this subject, but it's the kind of geeky issue Randall would typically take on in other circumstances too. [[User:MGK|MGK]] ([[User talk:MGK|talk]]) 19:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree - this is not directed at the US-presidential election. I also want to add, that Bayesian btatistics assumes that parameters of distributions (e.g. mean of gaussian) are also random variables. These random variables have prior distributions - in this case p(sun explodes). The Bayesian statistitian in this comic has access to this prior distribution and so has other estimates for an error of the neutrino detector. The knowlege of the prior distribution is somewhat considered a &amp;quot;black art&amp;quot; by other statisticians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal interpretation of the &amp;quot;bet you $50 it hasn't&amp;quot; reply is in the case of the sun going nova, no one would be alive to ask the neutrino detector, the probability of the sun going nova is always 0. [[User:Paps|Paps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, you would be able to ask. While neutrinos move almost at speed of light, the plasma of the explosion is significally slower, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova 10% of speed of light tops]. You will have more that hour to ask. (Note that technically, sun can't go [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova nova], because nova is white dwarf with external source of hydrogen. It can (and will), however, go supernova, which I assume is what Randall means.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Our sun will not go supernova, as it has insufficient mass.  It will slowly become hotter, rendering Earth uninhabitable in a few billion years.  In about 5 billion years it will puff up into a red giant, swallowing the inner planets.  After that, it will gradually blow off its lighter gasses, eventually leaving behind the core, a white dwarf. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.38.245|50.0.38.245]] 01:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please don't edit others' comments on talk pages; it's considered quite rude. On a talk page, discourse is meant to be conducted, by editors for the betterment of the article. For constructive discourse to occur, a person's words must be left in tact. The act of censorship hurts the common goal of betterment. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments Wikipedia], the authoritative source on how a wiki works best: &amp;quot;you ''should not'' edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.&amp;quot; [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  17:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Note: much of this conversation has been removed at the request of the authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the explanation is wrong or otherwise lacking in its explanation: The P-value is not the entire problem with the frequentist's viewpoint (or alternatively, the problem with the p-value hasn't been explained). The Frequentist has looked strictly at a two case scenario: Either the machine rolls 6-6 and is lying, or it doesn't rolls 6-6 and it is telling the truth. Therefore, there is a 35/36 probability (97.22%) that the machine is telling the truth and therefore the sun has exploded. The Bayesian is factoring in outside facts and information to improve the accuracy of the probability model. He says &amp;quot;Either the machine rolls 6-6 (a 1/36 probability, or 2.77%) or the sun has exploded (an aparently far less likely scenario). Given the comparison, the Bayesian believes it is MORE probable that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded, given the relative probabilities. If the latter is a 1 in a million chance (0.000001%), it is 2,777,777 times more likely that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded.&lt;br /&gt;
To borrow a demonstration/explanation technique from the Monty Hall problem, if the machine told you a coin flip was heads, that would be 50% chance of occuring while a 2.7% chance of the machine lying, the probabilities would clearly suggest that the machine was more likely to be telling the truth. Whereas if the machine said that 100 coin flips had all come up heads (7.88x10^-31%). Is it more likely that 100 coin flips all came up heads or is it more likely the machine is lying? What about 1000 coin flips? or 1,000,000? I think the question is, whether one could assign a probability to the sun exploding. Also, I think they could have avoided the whole thing by asking the machine a second time and see what it answered. [[User:TheHYPO|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO|talk]]) 19:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source of explanation: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/43339/whats-wrong-with-xkcds-frequentists-vs-bayesians-comic --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 20:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The P-value really has nothing to do with it.  If I think that there is a 35/36 chance that the sun has exploded, then I should we willing to take any bet that the sun has exploded with better than 1:35 odds.  For example, if someone bets me that the sun has exploded in which they will pay me $2 if the sun has exploded and I will pay them $35 if it hasn't, then based on my belief that the sun has exploded with 35/36 probability, then my expected value for this bet is 2*35/36 - 35 * 1/36 = 35/36 dollars and I will take this bet.  Clearly I would also take a bet with 1:1 odds - my estimated expected value in the proposed bet in the comic would be 50*35/36 - 50 * 1/36 = $49 (approximately), and I would for sure take this bet.  The Bayesian on the other hand has a much lower belief that the sun has exploded because he takes into account the prior probability of the sun exploding, so he would take the reverse side of the bet.  The difference is that the Bayesian uses prior probabilities in computing his belief in an event, whereas frequentists do not believe that you can put prior probabilities on events in the real world.  Also note that this comic has nothing to do with whether people would die if the sun went nova - the comic is titled &amp;quot;Frequentists vs Bayesians&amp;quot; and is about the difference between these two approaches. {{unsigned|171.64.68.120}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Labyrinth reference reminds me of an old Doctor Who episode (Pyramid of Mars), where the Doctor is also faced with a truthful and untruthful set of guards. Summarized here: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Pyramids_of_Mars_(TV_story) [[User:Fermax|Fermax]] ([[User talk:Fermax|talk]]) 04:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually an example of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy Base rate fallacy]. --[[Special:Contributions/71.199.125.210|71.199.125.210]] 04:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People have gone over this already, but just to be a bit more explicit:&lt;br /&gt;
Let NOVA be the event that there was a nova, and let YES be the event that the detector responds &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; to the question &amp;quot;Did the sun go nova?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
What we want is P(NOVA|YES)=P(YES|NOVA)*P(NOVA)/P(YES)&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose P(NOVA)=p is the prior probability of a nova.&lt;br /&gt;
Then P(YES|NOVA)=35/36, P(NOVA)=p, and P(YES)=p*35/36+(1-p)*1/36=1/36+34/36&lt;br /&gt;
So then P(NOVA|YES)=35p/(1+34p). If p is small, then P(NOVA|YES) is also small. In particular, the Bayesian statistician wins his bet at 1:1 odds if p&amp;lt;1/36, which is probably the case.&lt;br /&gt;
If the Bayesian statistician wants 95% confidence that he'll win his bet, then he needs p&amp;lt;1/666. =P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's cute to attempt to connect this to the U.S. presidential election, but it's far likelier that it's a reference to Enrico Fermi taking bets at the Trinity test site as to whether or not the first atomic bomb would cause a chain reaction that would ignite the entire atmosphere and destroy the planet.  I'll bet you $50 it is.  [[Special:Contributions/71.229.88.206|71.229.88.206]] 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't like the explanation at all. Some of the discussion posts give a good view on this. I'd like to share my thought about the last panel, though. The page reads as if the punch line is about the fact that you cannot spend the money if the sun was going to explode; but why does the bayesian propose this bet and not the frequentist - no reason for this. I think there is a better explanation for this panel: there are several proofs that bayesian probabilities result in &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; behaviour: They state that if you act according to bayes' rule you cannot be cheated in betting. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.179|108.162.254.179]] 17:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last panel may refer to Nate Sliver's view expressed in his book {{w|The Signal and the Noise}} that if one believes one's prediction to be true one should be confident to bet on it. --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 18:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please excuse my ignorance, but how is two sixes rolled on fair dice 31/32?  (In the explanation: &amp;quot;the detector is telling the truth (31 in 32)&amp;quot;) --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just a missreading, not stupid. The detector is telling the truth when you dont role 2 sixes. roling 2 sixes is 1/6 * 1/6 or 1/36. So not roling is 35 in 36, wait oops 36 not 32, thanks. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 17:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have always thought that the suggested Bet is also a reference to the Dutch Book argument for judging and accounting for probabilities underlying Bayesian interpretations of probability theory. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.100|141.101.98.100]] 22:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The likelyhood of a solar explosion may be wrong.  Since the detector I'd only used at night, the event is twice as likely to occur than listed.  That said, there's a 50% chance of the event never being detected, so I'm not sure.  Any one more knowledgeable than I care to comment? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh. I thought that the last panel was pragmatism: &amp;quot;If the sun goes nova, $50 doesn't matter; I'll be dead. If the sun hasn't, I get $50!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Same, but sign your comments, [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 14:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic hurts my head. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.7|173.245.54.7]] 21:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my feeling that sloppy or machiavellian academics have come to use the term &amp;quot;Bayesian&amp;quot; to mean something more like &amp;quot;we adjusted it to what we felt was most reasonable&amp;quot;, which introduces so much bias that it actually leaves one unable to determine the scientific validity of the results. I was reading [https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/3/619/224216 a publication], today, that made me think of that and look up this comic. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 21:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a statistical angle I'm missing to the final part of the mouseover text 'did your brain fall out? [roll] yes...' Or is is purely linguistic between literal and figurative i.e. if his brain has fallen out as in he has made a careless error, then that's true. If it's literally did his brain fall out, is the 'yes' the 97% chance that it's talking about his mistake, or the ~3% chance that it's lying about the literal truth? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.244|172.69.69.244]] 14:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per Sagan, &amp;quot;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.54|108.162.229.54]] 10:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he Bayesian  says &amp;quot;Bet you $50 it hasn't.&amp;quot;, he is saying that he will probably win the bet.  However, he isn't saying he knows whether the sun has exploded or whether the detector is lying.   What he is saying is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;If we are playing Texas Holdem and I have a royal flush while you have nothing showing, I am probably going to win and might as well bet what I can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the eventist says &amp;quot;Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether I would say the sun had exploded&amp;quot;, the Bayesian doesn't know what the detector would say.  (I am changing the wording slightly, but it doesn't make sense to me as stated.)  Therefore, the Bayesian can't give an answer.  The Bayesian's answer would therefore be &amp;quot;I am a neutrino detector (answers are sometimes true and sometimes false), not a labyrinth guard (answers are always true or  always false)&amp;quot;.  He then predicts that the Bayesian would say &amp;quot;Seriously, did your brain fall out?&amp;quot;  After somebody hits the button, the detector answers truthfully (the likeliest option), and gives his opinion &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot;. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 01:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to Bayesian having multiple meanings, this is probably similar to there being a Turing test, a Turing machine, and Turing Complete.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306655</id>
		<title>Talk:1132: Frequentists vs. Bayesians</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306655"/>
				<updated>2023-02-23T01:26:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Added comment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just sort of assumed he bet 50 dollars because if the sun had exploded, they'd be dead and therefore wouldn't need the machine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.16|108.162.237.16]] 07:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Something should be added about the prior probability of the sun going nova, as that is the primary substantive point. &amp;quot;The neutrino detector is evidence that the Sun has exploded. It's showing an observation which is 35 times more likely to appear if the Sun has exploded than if it hasn't (likelihood ratio of 35:1). The Bayesian just doesn't think that's strong enough evidence to overcome the prior odds, i.e., after multiplying the prior odds by 35 they still aren't very high.&amp;quot; - http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/fe5/xkcd_frequentist_vs_bayesians/ [[Special:Contributions/209.65.52.92|209.65.52.92]] 23:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: taking that bet would be a mistake. If the Bayesian is right, you're out $50. If he's wrong, everyone is about to die and you'll never get to spend the winnings. Of course, this meta-analysis is itself a type of Bayesian thinking, so [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dunning-kruger+effect Dunning-Kruger Effect] would apply. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 13:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: You don't think you could spend fifty bucks in eight minutes? ;-)  (PS: wikipedia is probably a better link than lmgtfy: {{w|Dunning-Kruger effect}}) -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has referenced the Labyrinth guards before: [http://xkcd.com/246/ xkcd 246:Labyrinth puzzle]. Plus he has satirized p&amp;lt;0.05 in [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=882:_Significant xkcd 882:Significant]--[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 15:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bit of maths. Let event N be the sun going nova and event Y be the detector giving the answer &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;. The detector has already given a positive answer so we want to compute P(N|Y). Applying the Bayes' theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) = 1&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N) = 0.0000....&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) * P(N) = 0.0000...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = p(Y|N)*P(N) + P(Y|-N)*P(-N)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|-N) = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(-N) = 0.999999...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = 0 + 1/36 = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = 0 / (1/36) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
Quite likely it's not entirely correct. [[User:Lmpk|Lmpk]] ([[User talk:Lmpk|talk]]) 16:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what I get for the application of Bayes' Theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y): = P(Y|N) * P(N) / [P(Y|N) * P(N) + P(Y|~N) * P(~N)]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35/36 * P(N) / [35/36 * P(N) + 1/36 * (1 - P(N))]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * P(N) / [35 * P(N) - P(N) + 1]&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt; 35 * P(N)&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * (really small number)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you believe it's extremely unlikely for the sun to go nova, then you should also believe it's unlikely a Yes answer is true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't say the comic is about election prediction models. It's about a long-standing dispute between two different schools of statisticians, a dispute that began before Nate Silver was born. It's possible that the recent media attention for Silver and his ilk inspired this subject, but it's the kind of geeky issue Randall would typically take on in other circumstances too. [[User:MGK|MGK]] ([[User talk:MGK|talk]]) 19:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree - this is not directed at the US-presidential election. I also want to add, that Bayesian btatistics assumes that parameters of distributions (e.g. mean of gaussian) are also random variables. These random variables have prior distributions - in this case p(sun explodes). The Bayesian statistitian in this comic has access to this prior distribution and so has other estimates for an error of the neutrino detector. The knowlege of the prior distribution is somewhat considered a &amp;quot;black art&amp;quot; by other statisticians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal interpretation of the &amp;quot;bet you $50 it hasn't&amp;quot; reply is in the case of the sun going nova, no one would be alive to ask the neutrino detector, the probability of the sun going nova is always 0. [[User:Paps|Paps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, you would be able to ask. While neutrinos move almost at speed of light, the plasma of the explosion is significally slower, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova 10% of speed of light tops]. You will have more that hour to ask. (Note that technically, sun can't go [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova nova], because nova is white dwarf with external source of hydrogen. It can (and will), however, go supernova, which I assume is what Randall means.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Our sun will not go supernova, as it has insufficient mass.  It will slowly become hotter, rendering Earth uninhabitable in a few billion years.  In about 5 billion years it will puff up into a red giant, swallowing the inner planets.  After that, it will gradually blow off its lighter gasses, eventually leaving behind the core, a white dwarf. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.38.245|50.0.38.245]] 01:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please don't edit others' comments on talk pages; it's considered quite rude. On a talk page, discourse is meant to be conducted, by editors for the betterment of the article. For constructive discourse to occur, a person's words must be left in tact. The act of censorship hurts the common goal of betterment. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments Wikipedia], the authoritative source on how a wiki works best: &amp;quot;you ''should not'' edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.&amp;quot; [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  17:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Note: much of this conversation has been removed at the request of the authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the explanation is wrong or otherwise lacking in its explanation: The P-value is not the entire problem with the frequentist's viewpoint (or alternatively, the problem with the p-value hasn't been explained). The Frequentist has looked strictly at a two case scenario: Either the machine rolls 6-6 and is lying, or it doesn't rolls 6-6 and it is telling the truth. Therefore, there is a 35/36 probability (97.22%) that the machine is telling the truth and therefore the sun has exploded. The Bayesian is factoring in outside facts and information to improve the accuracy of the probability model. He says &amp;quot;Either the machine rolls 6-6 (a 1/36 probability, or 2.77%) or the sun has exploded (an aparently far less likely scenario). Given the comparison, the Bayesian believes it is MORE probable that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded, given the relative probabilities. If the latter is a 1 in a million chance (0.000001%), it is 2,777,777 times more likely that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded.&lt;br /&gt;
To borrow a demonstration/explanation technique from the Monty Hall problem, if the machine told you a coin flip was heads, that would be 50% chance of occuring while a 2.7% chance of the machine lying, the probabilities would clearly suggest that the machine was more likely to be telling the truth. Whereas if the machine said that 100 coin flips had all come up heads (7.88x10^-31%). Is it more likely that 100 coin flips all came up heads or is it more likely the machine is lying? What about 1000 coin flips? or 1,000,000? I think the question is, whether one could assign a probability to the sun exploding. Also, I think they could have avoided the whole thing by asking the machine a second time and see what it answered. [[User:TheHYPO|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO|talk]]) 19:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source of explanation: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/43339/whats-wrong-with-xkcds-frequentists-vs-bayesians-comic --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 20:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The P-value really has nothing to do with it.  If I think that there is a 35/36 chance that the sun has exploded, then I should we willing to take any bet that the sun has exploded with better than 1:35 odds.  For example, if someone bets me that the sun has exploded in which they will pay me $2 if the sun has exploded and I will pay them $35 if it hasn't, then based on my belief that the sun has exploded with 35/36 probability, then my expected value for this bet is 2*35/36 - 35 * 1/36 = 35/36 dollars and I will take this bet.  Clearly I would also take a bet with 1:1 odds - my estimated expected value in the proposed bet in the comic would be 50*35/36 - 50 * 1/36 = $49 (approximately), and I would for sure take this bet.  The Bayesian on the other hand has a much lower belief that the sun has exploded because he takes into account the prior probability of the sun exploding, so he would take the reverse side of the bet.  The difference is that the Bayesian uses prior probabilities in computing his belief in an event, whereas frequentists do not believe that you can put prior probabilities on events in the real world.  Also note that this comic has nothing to do with whether people would die if the sun went nova - the comic is titled &amp;quot;Frequentists vs Bayesians&amp;quot; and is about the difference between these two approaches. {{unsigned|171.64.68.120}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Labyrinth reference reminds me of an old Doctor Who episode (Pyramid of Mars), where the Doctor is also faced with a truthful and untruthful set of guards. Summarized here: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Pyramids_of_Mars_(TV_story) [[User:Fermax|Fermax]] ([[User talk:Fermax|talk]]) 04:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually an example of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy Base rate fallacy]. --[[Special:Contributions/71.199.125.210|71.199.125.210]] 04:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People have gone over this already, but just to be a bit more explicit:&lt;br /&gt;
Let NOVA be the event that there was a nova, and let YES be the event that the detector responds &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; to the question &amp;quot;Did the sun go nova?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
What we want is P(NOVA|YES)=P(YES|NOVA)*P(NOVA)/P(YES)&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose P(NOVA)=p is the prior probability of a nova.&lt;br /&gt;
Then P(YES|NOVA)=35/36, P(NOVA)=p, and P(YES)=p*35/36+(1-p)*1/36=1/36+34/36&lt;br /&gt;
So then P(NOVA|YES)=35p/(1+34p). If p is small, then P(NOVA|YES) is also small. In particular, the Bayesian statistician wins his bet at 1:1 odds if p&amp;lt;1/36, which is probably the case.&lt;br /&gt;
If the Bayesian statistician wants 95% confidence that he'll win his bet, then he needs p&amp;lt;1/666. =P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's cute to attempt to connect this to the U.S. presidential election, but it's far likelier that it's a reference to Enrico Fermi taking bets at the Trinity test site as to whether or not the first atomic bomb would cause a chain reaction that would ignite the entire atmosphere and destroy the planet.  I'll bet you $50 it is.  [[Special:Contributions/71.229.88.206|71.229.88.206]] 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't like the explanation at all. Some of the discussion posts give a good view on this. I'd like to share my thought about the last panel, though. The page reads as if the punch line is about the fact that you cannot spend the money if the sun was going to explode; but why does the bayesian propose this bet and not the frequentist - no reason for this. I think there is a better explanation for this panel: there are several proofs that bayesian probabilities result in &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; behaviour: They state that if you act according to bayes' rule you cannot be cheated in betting. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.179|108.162.254.179]] 17:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last panel may refer to Nate Sliver's view expressed in his book {{w|The Signal and the Noise}} that if one believes one's prediction to be true one should be confident to bet on it. --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 18:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please excuse my ignorance, but how is two sixes rolled on fair dice 31/32?  (In the explanation: &amp;quot;the detector is telling the truth (31 in 32)&amp;quot;) --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just a missreading, not stupid. The detector is telling the truth when you dont role 2 sixes. roling 2 sixes is 1/6 * 1/6 or 1/36. So not roling is 35 in 36, wait oops 36 not 32, thanks. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 17:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have always thought that the suggested Bet is also a reference to the Dutch Book argument for judging and accounting for probabilities underlying Bayesian interpretations of probability theory. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.100|141.101.98.100]] 22:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The likelyhood of a solar explosion may be wrong.  Since the detector I'd only used at night, the event is twice as likely to occur than listed.  That said, there's a 50% chance of the event never being detected, so I'm not sure.  Any one more knowledgeable than I care to comment? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh. I thought that the last panel was pragmatism: &amp;quot;If the sun goes nova, $50 doesn't matter; I'll be dead. If the sun hasn't, I get $50!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Same, but sign your comments, [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 14:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic hurts my head. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.7|173.245.54.7]] 21:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my feeling that sloppy or machiavellian academics have come to use the term &amp;quot;Bayesian&amp;quot; to mean something more like &amp;quot;we adjusted it to what we felt was most reasonable&amp;quot;, which introduces so much bias that it actually leaves one unable to determine the scientific validity of the results. I was reading [https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/3/619/224216 a publication], today, that made me think of that and look up this comic. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 21:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a statistical angle I'm missing to the final part of the mouseover text 'did your brain fall out? [roll] yes...' Or is is purely linguistic between literal and figurative i.e. if his brain has fallen out as in he has made a careless error, then that's true. If it's literally did his brain fall out, is the 'yes' the 97% chance that it's talking about his mistake, or the ~3% chance that it's lying about the literal truth? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.244|172.69.69.244]] 14:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per Sagan, &amp;quot;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.54|108.162.229.54]] 10:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he Bayesian  says &amp;quot;Bet you $50 it hasn't.&amp;quot;, he is saying that he will probably win the bet.  However, he isn't saying he knows whether the sun has exploded or whether the detector is lying.   What he is saying is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;If we are playing Texas Holdem and I have a royal flush while you have nothing showing, I am probably going to win and might as well bet what I can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the eventist says &amp;quot;Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether I would say the sun had exploded&amp;quot;, the Bayesian doesn't know what the detector would say.  (I am changing the wording slightly, but it doesn't make sense to me as stated.)  Therefore, the Bayesian can't give an answer.  The Bayesian's answer would therefore be &amp;quot;I am a neutrino detector (answers are sometimes true and sometimes false), not a labyrinth guard (answers are always true or  always false)&amp;quot;.  He then predicts that the Bayesian would say &amp;quot;Seriously, did your brain fall out?&amp;quot;  After somebody hits the button, the detector answers truthfully (the likeliest option), and gives his opinion &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot;. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 01:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306654</id>
		<title>Talk:1132: Frequentists vs. Bayesians</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1132:_Frequentists_vs._Bayesians&amp;diff=306654"/>
				<updated>2023-02-23T01:24:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Adding some comments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just sort of assumed he bet 50 dollars because if the sun had exploded, they'd be dead and therefore wouldn't need the machine. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.16|108.162.237.16]] 07:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Something should be added about the prior probability of the sun going nova, as that is the primary substantive point. &amp;quot;The neutrino detector is evidence that the Sun has exploded. It's showing an observation which is 35 times more likely to appear if the Sun has exploded than if it hasn't (likelihood ratio of 35:1). The Bayesian just doesn't think that's strong enough evidence to overcome the prior odds, i.e., after multiplying the prior odds by 35 they still aren't very high.&amp;quot; - http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/fe5/xkcd_frequentist_vs_bayesians/ [[Special:Contributions/209.65.52.92|209.65.52.92]] 23:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: taking that bet would be a mistake. If the Bayesian is right, you're out $50. If he's wrong, everyone is about to die and you'll never get to spend the winnings. Of course, this meta-analysis is itself a type of Bayesian thinking, so [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dunning-kruger+effect Dunning-Kruger Effect] would apply. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 13:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: You don't think you could spend fifty bucks in eight minutes? ;-)  (PS: wikipedia is probably a better link than lmgtfy: {{w|Dunning-Kruger effect}}) -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has referenced the Labyrinth guards before: [http://xkcd.com/246/ xkcd 246:Labyrinth puzzle]. Plus he has satirized p&amp;lt;0.05 in [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=882:_Significant xkcd 882:Significant]--[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 15:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A bit of maths. Let event N be the sun going nova and event Y be the detector giving the answer &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot;. The detector has already given a positive answer so we want to compute P(N|Y). Applying the Bayes' theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) = 1&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N) = 0.0000....&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|N) * P(N) = 0.0000...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = p(Y|N)*P(N) + P(Y|-N)*P(-N)&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y|-N) = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(-N) = 0.999999...&lt;br /&gt;
: P(Y) = 0 + 1/36 = 1/36&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = 0 / (1/36) = 0&lt;br /&gt;
Quite likely it's not entirely correct. [[User:Lmpk|Lmpk]] ([[User talk:Lmpk|talk]]) 16:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what I get for the application of Bayes' Theorem:&lt;br /&gt;
: P(N|Y) = P(Y|N) * P(N) / P(Y): = P(Y|N) * P(N) / [P(Y|N) * P(N) + P(Y|~N) * P(~N)]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35/36 * P(N) / [35/36 * P(N) + 1/36 * (1 - P(N))]&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * P(N) / [35 * P(N) - P(N) + 1]&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt; 35 * P(N)&lt;br /&gt;
: = 35 * (really small number)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you believe it's extremely unlikely for the sun to go nova, then you should also believe it's unlikely a Yes answer is true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't say the comic is about election prediction models. It's about a long-standing dispute between two different schools of statisticians, a dispute that began before Nate Silver was born. It's possible that the recent media attention for Silver and his ilk inspired this subject, but it's the kind of geeky issue Randall would typically take on in other circumstances too. [[User:MGK|MGK]] ([[User talk:MGK|talk]]) 19:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree - this is not directed at the US-presidential election. I also want to add, that Bayesian btatistics assumes that parameters of distributions (e.g. mean of gaussian) are also random variables. These random variables have prior distributions - in this case p(sun explodes). The Bayesian statistitian in this comic has access to this prior distribution and so has other estimates for an error of the neutrino detector. The knowlege of the prior distribution is somewhat considered a &amp;quot;black art&amp;quot; by other statisticians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal interpretation of the &amp;quot;bet you $50 it hasn't&amp;quot; reply is in the case of the sun going nova, no one would be alive to ask the neutrino detector, the probability of the sun going nova is always 0. [[User:Paps|Paps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, you would be able to ask. While neutrinos move almost at speed of light, the plasma of the explosion is significally slower, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova 10% of speed of light tops]. You will have more that hour to ask. (Note that technically, sun can't go [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova nova], because nova is white dwarf with external source of hydrogen. It can (and will), however, go supernova, which I assume is what Randall means.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Our sun will not go supernova, as it has insufficient mass.  It will slowly become hotter, rendering Earth uninhabitable in a few billion years.  In about 5 billion years it will puff up into a red giant, swallowing the inner planets.  After that, it will gradually blow off its lighter gasses, eventually leaving behind the core, a white dwarf. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.38.245|50.0.38.245]] 01:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please don't edit others' comments on talk pages; it's considered quite rude. On a talk page, discourse is meant to be conducted, by editors for the betterment of the article. For constructive discourse to occur, a person's words must be left in tact. The act of censorship hurts the common goal of betterment. Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments Wikipedia], the authoritative source on how a wiki works best: &amp;quot;you ''should not'' edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission.&amp;quot; [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  17:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Note: much of this conversation has been removed at the request of the authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the explanation is wrong or otherwise lacking in its explanation: The P-value is not the entire problem with the frequentist's viewpoint (or alternatively, the problem with the p-value hasn't been explained). The Frequentist has looked strictly at a two case scenario: Either the machine rolls 6-6 and is lying, or it doesn't rolls 6-6 and it is telling the truth. Therefore, there is a 35/36 probability (97.22%) that the machine is telling the truth and therefore the sun has exploded. The Bayesian is factoring in outside facts and information to improve the accuracy of the probability model. He says &amp;quot;Either the machine rolls 6-6 (a 1/36 probability, or 2.77%) or the sun has exploded (an aparently far less likely scenario). Given the comparison, the Bayesian believes it is MORE probable that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded, given the relative probabilities. If the latter is a 1 in a million chance (0.000001%), it is 2,777,777 times more likely that the machine rolled 6-6 than the sun exploded.&lt;br /&gt;
To borrow a demonstration/explanation technique from the Monty Hall problem, if the machine told you a coin flip was heads, that would be 50% chance of occuring while a 2.7% chance of the machine lying, the probabilities would clearly suggest that the machine was more likely to be telling the truth. Whereas if the machine said that 100 coin flips had all come up heads (7.88x10^-31%). Is it more likely that 100 coin flips all came up heads or is it more likely the machine is lying? What about 1000 coin flips? or 1,000,000? I think the question is, whether one could assign a probability to the sun exploding. Also, I think they could have avoided the whole thing by asking the machine a second time and see what it answered. [[User:TheHYPO|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO|talk]]) 19:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source of explanation: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/43339/whats-wrong-with-xkcds-frequentists-vs-bayesians-comic --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 20:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The P-value really has nothing to do with it.  If I think that there is a 35/36 chance that the sun has exploded, then I should we willing to take any bet that the sun has exploded with better than 1:35 odds.  For example, if someone bets me that the sun has exploded in which they will pay me $2 if the sun has exploded and I will pay them $35 if it hasn't, then based on my belief that the sun has exploded with 35/36 probability, then my expected value for this bet is 2*35/36 - 35 * 1/36 = 35/36 dollars and I will take this bet.  Clearly I would also take a bet with 1:1 odds - my estimated expected value in the proposed bet in the comic would be 50*35/36 - 50 * 1/36 = $49 (approximately), and I would for sure take this bet.  The Bayesian on the other hand has a much lower belief that the sun has exploded because he takes into account the prior probability of the sun exploding, so he would take the reverse side of the bet.  The difference is that the Bayesian uses prior probabilities in computing his belief in an event, whereas frequentists do not believe that you can put prior probabilities on events in the real world.  Also note that this comic has nothing to do with whether people would die if the sun went nova - the comic is titled &amp;quot;Frequentists vs Bayesians&amp;quot; and is about the difference between these two approaches. {{unsigned|171.64.68.120}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Labyrinth reference reminds me of an old Doctor Who episode (Pyramid of Mars), where the Doctor is also faced with a truthful and untruthful set of guards. Summarized here: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Pyramids_of_Mars_(TV_story) [[User:Fermax|Fermax]] ([[User talk:Fermax|talk]]) 04:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually an example of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy Base rate fallacy]. --[[Special:Contributions/71.199.125.210|71.199.125.210]] 04:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People have gone over this already, but just to be a bit more explicit:&lt;br /&gt;
Let NOVA be the event that there was a nova, and let YES be the event that the detector responds &amp;quot;Yes&amp;quot; to the question &amp;quot;Did the sun go nova?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
What we want is P(NOVA|YES)=P(YES|NOVA)*P(NOVA)/P(YES)&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose P(NOVA)=p is the prior probability of a nova.&lt;br /&gt;
Then P(YES|NOVA)=35/36, P(NOVA)=p, and P(YES)=p*35/36+(1-p)*1/36=1/36+34/36&lt;br /&gt;
So then P(NOVA|YES)=35p/(1+34p). If p is small, then P(NOVA|YES) is also small. In particular, the Bayesian statistician wins his bet at 1:1 odds if p&amp;lt;1/36, which is probably the case.&lt;br /&gt;
If the Bayesian statistician wants 95% confidence that he'll win his bet, then he needs p&amp;lt;1/666. =P&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's cute to attempt to connect this to the U.S. presidential election, but it's far likelier that it's a reference to Enrico Fermi taking bets at the Trinity test site as to whether or not the first atomic bomb would cause a chain reaction that would ignite the entire atmosphere and destroy the planet.  I'll bet you $50 it is.  [[Special:Contributions/71.229.88.206|71.229.88.206]] 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't like the explanation at all. Some of the discussion posts give a good view on this. I'd like to share my thought about the last panel, though. The page reads as if the punch line is about the fact that you cannot spend the money if the sun was going to explode; but why does the bayesian propose this bet and not the frequentist - no reason for this. I think there is a better explanation for this panel: there are several proofs that bayesian probabilities result in &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; behaviour: They state that if you act according to bayes' rule you cannot be cheated in betting. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.179|108.162.254.179]] 17:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last panel may refer to Nate Sliver's view expressed in his book {{w|The Signal and the Noise}} that if one believes one's prediction to be true one should be confident to bet on it. --[[User:Troy0|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0|talk]]) 18:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please excuse my ignorance, but how is two sixes rolled on fair dice 31/32?  (In the explanation: &amp;quot;the detector is telling the truth (31 in 32)&amp;quot;) --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just a missreading, not stupid. The detector is telling the truth when you dont role 2 sixes. roling 2 sixes is 1/6 * 1/6 or 1/36. So not roling is 35 in 36, wait oops 36 not 32, thanks. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 17:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have always thought that the suggested Bet is also a reference to the Dutch Book argument for judging and accounting for probabilities underlying Bayesian interpretations of probability theory. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.100|141.101.98.100]] 22:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The likelyhood of a solar explosion may be wrong.  Since the detector I'd only used at night, the event is twice as likely to occur than listed.  That said, there's a 50% chance of the event never being detected, so I'm not sure.  Any one more knowledgeable than I care to comment? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh. I thought that the last panel was pragmatism: &amp;quot;If the sun goes nova, $50 doesn't matter; I'll be dead. If the sun hasn't, I get $50!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Same, but sign your comments, [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 14:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic hurts my head. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.7|173.245.54.7]] 21:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my feeling that sloppy or machiavellian academics have come to use the term &amp;quot;Bayesian&amp;quot; to mean something more like &amp;quot;we adjusted it to what we felt was most reasonable&amp;quot;, which introduces so much bias that it actually leaves one unable to determine the scientific validity of the results. I was reading [https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/23/3/619/224216 a publication], today, that made me think of that and look up this comic. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 21:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a statistical angle I'm missing to the final part of the mouseover text 'did your brain fall out? [roll] yes...' Or is is purely linguistic between literal and figurative i.e. if his brain has fallen out as in he has made a careless error, then that's true. If it's literally did his brain fall out, is the 'yes' the 97% chance that it's talking about his mistake, or the ~3% chance that it's lying about the literal truth? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.244|172.69.69.244]] 14:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per Sagan, &amp;quot;Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.54|108.162.229.54]] 10:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he Bayesian  says &amp;quot;Bet you $50 it hasn't.&amp;quot;, he is saying that he will probably win the bet.  However, he isn't saying he knows whether the sun has exploded or whether the detector is lying.   What he is saying is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;If we are playing Texas Holdem and I have a royal flush while you have nothing showing, I am probably going to win and might as well bet what I can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the eventist says &amp;quot;Detector! What would the Bayesian statistician say if I asked him whether I would say the sun had exploded&amp;quot;, the Bayesian doesn't know what the detector would say.  (I am changing the wording slightly, but it doesn't make sense to me as stated.)  Therefore, the Bayesian can't give an answer.  The Bayesian's answer would therefore be &amp;quot;I am a neutrino detector (answers are sometimes true and sometimes false), not a labyrinth guard (answers are always true or  always false)&amp;quot;.  He then predicts that the Bayesian would say &amp;quot;Seriously, did your brain fall out?&amp;quot;  After somebody hits the button, the detector answers truthfully (the likeliest option), and gives his opinion &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot;. 01:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2303:_Error_Types&amp;diff=191715</id>
		<title>Talk:2303: Error Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2303:_Error_Types&amp;diff=191715"/>
				<updated>2020-05-07T17:17:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: People changing numbers because they think that they are wrong&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of the time of this post, the title text is &amp;quot;Type IIII error: Mistaking tally marks for Roman neumerals&amp;quot;.  Is &amp;quot;neumerals&amp;quot; a typo, or is there a joke in there that I'm missing? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 22:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like a typo to me. Randall's patrons should have caught this for him!&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 23:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That particular mistake is actually just called a type error.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.221|162.158.62.221]] 23:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or, surely, a Type-0. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.82|162.158.159.82]] 01:09, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I am Type-O and as a Type-O Negative, I'm VERY popular at the blood bank! (Universal Donor) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.48|108.162.216.48]] 01:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Actually, that's an over-simplification. Type-O-neg is only universal for whole blood donations, and only truly universal for whole blood if you are also CMV-negative. For plasma donations, Type-AB (both -pos and -neg) are universal donors. For platelets, only Type-AB-pos is universal donor. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.81|162.158.74.81]] 16:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I was hoping it could be bent to be a tribute to John von Neumann. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.223|172.68.189.223]] 05:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like same type of typo he made at word &amp;quot;blag&amp;quot;: [[https://explainxkcd.com/148/ Intentional.]] [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.189|172.69.54.189]] 08:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Perhaps a reference to {{w|Neume|Neumes}}? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.211|162.158.158.211]] 09:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.48|108.162.216.48]] 01:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation builds on definitions of terms in statistics.  That's fine, but there are also non-statistical usages, just for example whether someone has now (or had before) the COVID-19 virus.  A false positive is a test result which incorrectly indicates that a particular condition or attribute is present, and a false negative is a test result which incorrectly indicates that a particular condition or attribute is absent.  A particular test is useful when its incidence of Type I and II errors is low.  Types III and IV in that context would be given by poorly designed tests which, even if they give correct results, do it for unsupportable reasons and are therefore unreliable for future results.  Types V, VI, VII, and VIII are necessary fillers in the sequence, once you decide that calling The Rise of Skywalker a mistake has to be error type IX simply because it's the ninth film in the series. [[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I could convince myself that the errors are a reference to each Star Wars movie. Definitely a stretch but I'd believe it.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.24|162.158.106.24]] 02:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely an Error of the Third Kind is when an Alien gets lost and lands on Earth. [[User:Arachrah|Arachrah]] ([[User talk:Arachrah|talk]]) 11:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we please stop categorizing every comic about scientific research and methods as COVID-19 related? This is getting quite silly.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.187.201|162.158.187.201]] 14:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I spent some time musing about whether the Skywalker saga could be taken as an exemplar of each of the types (e.g. the hypothesis for #1 is that Anakin Skywalker could bring balance to the Force, and the experiment was assigning him a tutor), but it's a stretch. I do like the idea that #9 is the epitome of errordom.16:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure where this would fit in, but a correct answer that is viewed by the experimenter as being incorrect because of a misunderstanding, so that he changes the recording of the measurement, resulting in an incorrect measurement that he view as correct.  This happened in a college classroom exercise involving Reynolds numbers.  Above a certain value of Reynold's number, laminar flow will change to turbulent flow.  However, that number is not where the change occurs but where laminar flow becomes unstable.  One student changed all the measurements to indicate that the flow changed to turbulent almost immediately.  I wondered what could have sped up the transition, thinking of things like loud noises and vibrations affecting the apparatus.  The student immediately and loudly yelled that he &amp;quot;hadn't changed the numbers&amp;quot;, with the vehemence indicating that he had actually changed the numbers.  One problem with analog meters was that some people staring at the meters actually thought that the needle moved when it actually hadn't.  Digital meters with automatic logging tended to get rid of this problem. 17:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2129:_1921_Fact_Checker&amp;diff=171764</id>
		<title>Talk:2129: 1921 Fact Checker</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2129:_1921_Fact_Checker&amp;diff=171764"/>
				<updated>2019-03-29T14:08:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Suggested list of provisions for pilgrims&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Two gallons of vinegar, huh?[[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.144|162.158.106.144]] 14:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I too respect this fact checker's perspective on what really matters (and what doesn't), it's clear to me that in this fact-obsessed 21st century we cannot let this purported fact go unverified. Get on it, people! ;)   [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 14:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I fact checked this comic. The text in question is on page 8 of the newspaper, leftmost column, three paragraphs from the bottom. [[User:Billtheplatypus|Billtheplatypus]] ([[User talk:Billtheplatypus|talk]]) 15:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: [citation needed] The LOC link in the explanation says that the Kansas City Sun was a Saturday Weekly, so it wouldn't have been published on Friday, May 6th, 1921 as claimed. Unfortunately, the LOC only has scans of from 1914 through 1920, so it doesn't have scans for 1921. Do you have a source where you fact checked it? [[User:Blaisepascal|Blaisepascal]] ([[User talk:Blaisepascal|talk]]) 15:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/477982773/ This]. You can get the OCR if you don't want to sign up. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.176|162.158.155.176]] 16:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Off topic, but oldnewspapers are interesting. Especially the notices and lawsuit notifications, it's interesting to see that the newspaper notifications was considered enough notice that a judgement could be rendered. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.215|172.68.46.215]] 17:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is still the case.  For certain types of civil actions where the respondent's address is unknown and personal service is otherwise unavailable, notice through newspaper publication is sufficient.  Larger cities in the US even have specialist legal newspapers that are primarily funded by payments for publishing these and other public notices.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think the explanation needs to clarify the dates here. There appear to be two different Kansas City Suns, one in Kansas, the other in Missouri. The Missouri one was a published from 1908-1924 and targeted the black community. The Kansas one was published at least from 1892 to 1924, and possibly longer (digitized issues up to 1924 are available online, which is also about when things start being still under copyright. Coincidence?). This fact check is in the Kansas paper. [[User:Blaisepascal|Blaisepascal]] ([[User talk:Blaisepascal|talk]]) 18:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't &amp;quot;whatever&amp;quot; be not worth checking? &amp;quot;Mostly whatever&amp;quot; implies it could be worth checking but beyond current enthusiasm. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.41|141.101.99.41]] 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought corn travelling back from England to America was the problem... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.90|162.158.90.90]] 16:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: By 1620 there should've been plenty of time to establish some growing of maize in England. I don't know the real truth, but it's plausible. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.82|162.158.214.82]] 16:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Historically, &amp;quot;corn&amp;quot; was a general term for grain, usually the local grain. It also referred to things which where grain-sized, like the large grains of salt used to make &amp;quot;corned beef&amp;quot; or hard warts on the feet. It was only in North America where the predominant local grain was maize that &amp;quot;corn&amp;quot; came to have the narrower meaning of maize. If there really was a requirement to bring a supply of &amp;quot;cornmeal&amp;quot; in the early 1600's from England to the Americas, I'd expect it to be ground wheat, barleycorn, or rye, not maize. [[User:Blaisepascal|Blaisepascal]] ([[User talk:Blaisepascal|talk]]) 16:47, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's there any more information/sources on this? I find this interesting. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.215|172.68.46.215]] 17:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Source: [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/corn#Noun wiktionary], [https://www.google.com/search?q=dictionary+corn google's dictionary], and presumably any other English dictionary you might prefer. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 18:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Is this related to the corn mazes that I see on TV shows? Some kind of pun about maize mazes? I don't live in the US, I don't know a lot about that; I have only seen those in TV shows [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.58|162.158.78.58]] 03:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
::: Oh, they really exist. I've encountered them in both New York and Maryland. We use to go to one as a &amp;quot;mandatory fun&amp;quot; day at my former employer. In fact, when I left my old job, my boss asked me if I wanted to stay an extra week to participate in the annual employee event. I asked him, &amp;quot;Does it involve corn?&amp;quot; and when I got a yes, I said no thanks. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.191|162.158.79.191]] 14:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blaisepascal is arguing that the article (or incomplete template) was, in fact, created by a BOT. Before starting an edit war, can I check the consensus on what we do with the created by? I always use the [relevant item]. [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 19:53, 27 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I've seen it both ways, although keeping the BOT part would be less common. It works as is; I wouldn't change it. --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.141.148|172.68.141.148]] 07:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I was looking at http://mayflowerhistory.com/provision-lists that discusses some lists of items that the pilgrims were to take with them.  This sounds related to what was discussed in the text from the newspaper. 14:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171569</id>
		<title>Talk:2127: Panama Canal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171569"/>
				<updated>2019-03-25T02:58:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Political problems&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Can any English majors verify if 'we would had to modify it' in the Title text is grammatically ok or not? It sounds like it should be 'we would have had to modify it' or 'we would've had to...', but I could be wrong or maybe it was intentional? [[User:Stickfigurefan|Stickfigurefan]] ([[User talk:Stickfigurefan|talk]]) 18:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure it is just a missing word and yes I think &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; is the missing word  so ''we would have had to modify it'' was the intention. Maybe it will be corrected, the comic has only been up 20 minutes now. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But as written, you can split the title text exactly in half (at the the space after &amp;quot;would&amp;quot;, and including the final period). &amp;quot;Have&amp;quot; doesn't work--the two halves aren't even--&amp;quot;halve&amp;quot; works...but then you have to split it as &amp;quot;ha|lve&amp;quot;. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, there also appears to be another missing word: &amp;quot;...would ['ve/of/have] had to modify it [to] include...&amp;quot;. I was hoping there was a joke in the shorter cut--representing the standard Panama palindrome--crossing the longer title text (represented in the vertical canal, leaving an improperly-cut &amp;quot;have&amp;quot;, either as 've or &amp;quot;of&amp;quot;) but two missing words doesn't seem to fit that hope. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:The title text reads as if Randall was sleepy, drunk, or distracted.  The missing words are common typos. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.114|172.68.65.114]] 02:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fun fact:  The portion of the Arctic–Antarctic Canal that passes through central Panamá actually runs from south to north (or at least southwest to northeast), rather than from north to south!  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 19:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The actual Panama Canal runs West to East from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Both are due to the fact that Panama is a bit of an S shape. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 00:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::  Right, that's the ''real'' fun fact.  Mine is a fun fact in the alternate universe where Randall's canal proposal was accepted.  But I'm pleased that both of these can be seen on Randall's maps, if you look closely.  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 02:57, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not permanently.  The Pacific plate is rotating counterclockwise, so Baja will someday be off the coast of California instead of off the coast of Mexico (the boundary between the Pacific plate and North American plates runs through the Gulf of California and the San Andreas fault).  This motion may straighten Panama... or tear it apart into two disconnected pieces (making a canal unnecessary).[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.95|172.69.33.95]] 18:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proposal for the Suez Canal was for it to run from the Cape of Good Hope to Cape Dezhnev via Nepal and Tibet... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.152|162.158.155.152]] 21:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would you opt for tunnel through Himalayas? Note that Himalayas are still rising by more than 1 cm per year, so you would need to compensate in your maintenance plans. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would it connect to the proposed bridge to Alaska?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's interesting to me how palindromic the Panama cut is...compared to the other one. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wot no Palindromes [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.41|141.101.99.41]] 00:53, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose a canal between Tierra del Fuego and The Cape of Good Hope. US$1.000.000.000 and I keep the difference if the project is completed under-budget. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 06:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also the issue that the proposed canal would go though at least a dozen countries.  Political problems in any of the countries would probably result in it closing.  Remember that the United States was so afraid of losing access to the Gulf of Mexico via the Mississippi that they paid for the Louisiana purchase. 02:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2091:_Million,_Billion,_Trillion&amp;diff=167538</id>
		<title>Talk:2091: Million, Billion, Trillion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2091:_Million,_Billion,_Trillion&amp;diff=167538"/>
				<updated>2018-12-31T03:11:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I actually think we have ''too many names'' for large numbers. It's really only necessary to introduce a new name when you reach the ''square'' of the previous name. So, we'd still have tens and hundreds, but there's no need for &amp;quot;one thousand, one hundred&amp;quot; when you can just have &amp;quot;eleven hundred&amp;quot;. We'd be better off just naming 10^4, 10^8, 10^16, 10^32, and that's already well beyond anything needed for normal usage, with only a handful of names. None of this &amp;quot;quattuordecillion&amp;quot; stuff that no-one can remember without sitting down and working it out. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.86.64|172.68.86.64]] 05:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: And what you get is a super-weird &amp;quot;double-log&amp;quot; scale! The British (and other nations') usage is correct. Anything above thousand is completely abstract for a human being and intuitively nonlinear (some nations - ancient Greeks and others - go as far as ten thousands, a myriad, but this is it). A thousand squared is already far beyond intuition so it is a good candidate for a new unit representing A BIG NUMBER, plus log scale is a good abstraction allowing for rapid expansion in magnitude. So taking Latin numerals and adding an -illion suffix (except the irregular million) for subsequent powers of 10^6 is a really convenient system. Of course, it goes only as far as ordinary Latin numbers go, then you need to invent something else, but at this point it's only for entertainment. For anything physical you probably would never need a number much larger than a googol. -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.90|162.158.90.90]] 09:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think we should refrain from saying one usage is correct over the other - that's just arrogant and mean.  That said, the current explanation states that usage is different between American and British English, but my reading on Wikipedia (which is already hyperlinked in the explanation) states that in recent decades Britain has declared their use of short units and therefore British English is now the same as American English.  The only regions where it appears there is still usage of the long system is in French and Spanish speaking regions, as well as some special cases around the world. Don't shoot the messenger - I'm just repeating what it states on the Wikipedia page. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 10:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Rereading the Wikipedia page, it was in 1974 that Britain declared their use of the short scale for large numbers. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 10:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Actually, Germany also uses the &amp;quot;long&amp;quot; (i.e. natural) scale to this day, and I remember how much trouble I had understanding the American system. As the second comment above states, the long scale is (prefix)-llion = 10^(prefix*6), or (prefix)-lliard''e'' = 10^(prefix*6+3); whereas in the short system, (prefix)-llion = 10^(prefix*3+3), which is rather less obvious, if you have any intuition for numbers (and a little Latin). [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_und_kurze_Skala German Wikipedia] tells me that the long scale was invented 1484/1550 by French mathematicians, and the short one in the 17th century in Italy and France by some geniuses that thought when grouping the digits on paper by three instead of six, they should change the group names to make confusion complete. Also, they claim official usage of the short variant is in USA, Brazil, and English-language finance. The names for the systems, however, are from 1975, from yet another French mathematichan, Geneviève Guitel. --[[User:Khms|Khms]] ([[User talk:Khms|talk]]) 10:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: East Asian languages such as Japanese actually do use the power-4 scale, with the naming being ten, ten x ten = hundred, hundred x hundred = big'ousand, big'ousand x big'ousand = morebiggienoughty, morebiggienoughty x morebiggienoughty = superbiggienoughty, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Crore. Weird word unless you are in or from India. [[User:Snezzy|Snezzy]] ([[User talk:Snezzy|talk]]) 11:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The &amp;quot;named power-of-two power-of-ten&amp;quot; system you propose already exists, in the form of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-yllion Donald Knuth's -yllion system]. 10^2 = hundred, 10^4 = myriad, 10^8 = myllion, 10^16 = byllion, 10^32 = tryllion, etc. 10^63 would be written as &amp;quot;ten hundred myriad myllion byllion tryllion&amp;quot;, and the next power of 10, 10^64, is one quadryllion. 10^100 (i.e. googol) is one myriad tryllion quadryllion. It's quite efficient, as you point out, and were I to rewrite our number system from scratch, it's the system I would use. Unfortunately, nobody alive grew up with -yllions, so we're stuck with the inefficiency of named multiple-of-three powers-of-ten. Although apparently [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_numerals#Large_numbers some parts of East Asia at some points in time] used a similar system, with specific characters for the -yllions up to 10^4096. I find myself severely disappointed that those characters are now used to represent different (and much smaller) numbers. --[[User:Someone Else 37|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37|talk]]) 01:38, 30 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I said this earlier, and I'm going to say it again - the split between use of the short scale and the long scale is NOT a U.S. thing, nor an Atlantic Ocean thing! Just navigate to the hyperlinked page on Wikipedia, and scroll down to the graphic map showing who uses which system to see this very clearly. The majority of the globe uses the short scale except for the following regions:  Europe other than Britain, Iran, some countries in Africa, and some countries in Latin America and South America, as well as French speaking regions in otherwise short-scale countries. Notable non-U.S. short-scale countries include Russia and Australia, along with Eastern South America and most of Africa. It's frustrating when people insist on making something about those U.S.A. people that has nothing to do with us. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 14:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Even the line containing the &amp;quot;In Britian&amp;quot; hyperlink does NOT say what the linked page actually states - that Britain uses the short-scale now, although they used the long-scale quite some time ago (before 1974). [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 14:58, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The line that includes &amp;quot;Though people in Britain often use the American definition as of the past few decades&amp;quot; is a bit misleading. In fact, the government of Great Britain announced, proclaimed, and declared that they will officially use the short-scale scheme in 1974. If you live there and are still using the long-scale system, then per your countries leadership you are wrong! The short-scale system is YOUR definition, not the American definition.  Interestingly, we didn't invent the short-scale system because it was brought to the Americas by Europeans before the United States of America was even founded! We just continued to use it because it's all we knew until Randall came along and pointed out how screwed up the rest of the world is! [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 15:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long live scientific / exponential notation! 16:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Set the first tick on the y-axis to have value 0, and set the last tick to have value 5. Then, the y-values of all the y-axis ticks are 0, 1.0053, 1.9973, 3.0127, 3.9947, and 5, approximately as expected. (The x-axis is at y-value -0.9903.) Now, setting the x-axis as the base-10 logarithm, the points' coordinates are as follows: (6, 0.5388); (7, 2.4800); (8, 3.7672); (9, 1.8009); (10, 3.3622); (11, 4.2860); (12, 3.2495); (13, 4.1125); (14, 4.5939). [[User:LegionMammal978|LegionMammal978]] ([[User talk:LegionMammal978|talk]]) 16:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd even say that 999,999,999 (especially when worded in full) seems like a way bigger number than 1 billion, despite being one less. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.28|108.162.229.28]] 16:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph reminded me of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia#Number_form number-form synaesthesia], which I have.  My number shape (and most people's) is different though, and much more curly. [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 17:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The way I keep track of this is to remember that 1 trillion is 1 million millions. So if the US current national debt (counting neither debt by the states nor unfunded future liabilities) is 23 trillion dollars, then you would need a million dollars from 23 million people to pay it off. The US total population is roughly 327 million. So you would need a million dollars from every 14th person (counting adults, children and babies). Considering that there are only 11 million millionaires in the US and only 172 thousand people with net worth over 25 million, we are in deep doo-doo. Clearly, not even the fantasy &amp;quot;tax the rich&amp;quot; is not going to help pay the future. Lack of number appreciation is going to kill us. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 22:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of you may be too young to remember the nuclear reactor incident at Three Mile Island [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_Nuclear_Generating_Station].  There was a news broadcast at the time that stated that radiation of less than 5 rem (Roentgen Equivalent Man) was not considered biologically significant.  He then went on to say that measurements at the plant showed 3,000 milli-REM, which was obviously (in his mind) much higher and extremely scary.  In case you don't realize it, 3,000 milli-rem is 3 rem.  In addition, some style guides recommend that you avoid the words billion and trillion. [https://www.sciencestyle.com.au/billion-trillion-illion Australian scientific style guied.] [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 03:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2000:_xkcd_Phone_2000&amp;diff=158100</id>
		<title>Talk:2000: xkcd Phone 2000</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2000:_xkcd_Phone_2000&amp;diff=158100"/>
				<updated>2018-06-01T16:14:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Copyright, Trademark, Registered Trademark Symbols&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh, it's not a milestone comic like 1000 was. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.191|172.68.58.191]] 16:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm slightly disappointed honestly [[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.46|172.68.54.46]] 16:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gotta wait for an actual round number, like 0b100000000000 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.127|162.158.111.127]] 16:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well it is the phone 2000 and he does mention in passing asking if 2000 is a good number to choose [[User:Zachweix|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix|talk]]) 16:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What am I waiting for more: 2018 or 2048? [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Waiting for 2018 personally. A comic that has looked at the calendar so many times should be able to see the comic number match the year. [[User:Lukeskylicker|Lukeskylicker]] ([[User talk:Lukeskylicker|talk]]) 17:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think it is pretty clearly a milestone comic. Previous xkcd Phones were timed near iPhone releases. This is very specifically for the 2000th comic. I think it no coincidence that the xkcd Phone 2000 was released for the 2000th one, and think it should be mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.28|162.158.63.28]] 18:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was disappointed, was expecting a 1000-style comic. [[User:JayPlaysBeamNG|JayPlaysBeamNG]] ([[User talk:JayPlaysBeamNG|talk]]) 19:43, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's just the exact same thing as 1000, which IMHO I don't really want. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.41|172.68.46.41]] 20:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might be worth noting, that mouse cursors were a thing on BlackBerry smartphones. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.100|162.158.202.100]] 17:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those had the weird double-screens, where you could lightly drag your finger around and the cursor would follow, and if you pushed hard it would click. Most people found it to be annoying at best, IIRC. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.165|162.158.74.165]] 18:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They actually still work on Android if you pair a mouse with the phone (at least, last I tried it). This was actually annoying - my Apple Magic Mouse prefers to pair to my Android Phone than to my Macbook Pro! [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would buy it just to be able to plug a keyboard into the type A port. I hate the USB host-peripheral thing... My phone is more than capable of handling external devices. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't you like USB OTG or type C adaptors? Bluetooth keyboards should actually work with many Android (or Windows Mobile) devices. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Most Android phones accept keyboard/mouse/pendrive/whatever standard USB peripheral through its USB, some are able to power them, for others you need to provide an external power source. For my old Moto Droid 4, I connected OTG adapter to a USB hub and there one self-made male-male cable for power and rest for peripherals :) As soon as you connect a mouse, the pointer appears. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.215.103|172.68.215.103]] 07:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The issue is you need the adapter. I hope to get an OTG adapter someday, but it is just annoying to have to carry an adapter around (Thank goodness I still have a headphone jack...)I am really hoping type C just cleans up the mess, considering a lot of phones have more power than some old desktops... it just bugs me. 'Course, it would probably not be a priority for the OEM's because 99% won't care. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 15:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think PCB refers to Printed Circuit Board which I assume naturally doesn't contain BPA. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.28|172.68.174.28]] 18:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I edited the explanation to include Printed Circuit Board. I didn't go as far as to remove the alternate explanation, but I think you are correct [[User:Itijara|Itijara]] ([[User talk:Itijara|talk]]) 19:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC) Itijara&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The charging area looks an awful lot like the suggestive violin plots of [[1967:_Violin_Plots]] {{unsigned ip|162.158.186.42 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that even a &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; USB port? it looks like it has one too many pins to me, although i guess maybe it could be a 3.0 port. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.219|172.69.68.219]] 21:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Title text - Our retina display features hundreds of pixels per inch in the central fovea region.&lt;br /&gt;
There is so much language in this and a big error not covered here:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Our'' isn't them, it's us! We all (mostly) have two eyes and the retina collects visual information in pixels.&lt;br /&gt;
*But hundreds of pixels is far too low. The Wiki article {{w|Fovea centralis}} tells me &amp;quot;50 per 100 micrometres in the most central fovea&amp;quot;. This is approximately 12,700 per inch. This would lead to roughly 162 GigaPixels.&lt;br /&gt;
*And then the human eye isn't large as an inch, and the &amp;quot;most central fovea&amp;quot; is much smaller. Maybe Randall will correct the &amp;quot;hundreds of pixels per inch&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless the word ''retina'' is focusing on people who know the ''Apple Retina Display'' but don't know where it comes from. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No comment on &amp;quot;®®™®©™®&amp;quot;?? {{unsigned ip|162.158.74.147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly hope comic 2001 has a reference to ''2001: A Space Odyssey''. {{unsigned ip|162.158.74.135}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why '''Maggie Haberman'''? Is it just because of her prolific Twitter usage? I'm not aware how that relates to captioning photos, am I missing a reference? {{unsigned|JohnHawkinson}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If comic #404 wasn't counted due to Comic Not Found, it means that this comic is not really #2000, but rather #1999. Probably on Wednesday it will be truly comic #2000. {{unsigned|Xkcdreader52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could &amp;quot;keyboard supports dynamic typing&amp;quot; actually refer to the fact that the keyboard can be used to write different words, and not in fact be locked into writing the same sentence over and over again... A sensible but clearly not marketing material point&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.197|141.101.99.197]] 21:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Sedontane&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted the death mask thing to mean that the phone would edit a picture of you to resemble what you will look like when you die, which would resemble your present state more or less closely depending on how and when that happens. {{unsigned ip| (ip)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two Unicode characters for the letters C and R in circles.  The enclosed C and enclosed R characters are neither superscript or subscript. and registered trademark (&amp;amp;amp;reg;  &amp;amp;reg;) and copyright (&amp;amp;amp;copy; &amp;amp;copy;) are smaller and often superscript.  The copyright symbol should be used in place of enclosed C and the registered trademark symbol should be used instead of enclosed R. All registered trademarks are trademarks.  Not all trademarks are registered copyrights.  Therefore, the two symbols should not be used together.  You should have only one of the symbols (&amp;amp;reg; &amp;amp;trade; &amp;amp;copy;) and it should appear immediately after the item it refers to.  Items can have copyrights, trademarks, and service marks, but not a combination.  Dictionary words, such as &amp;quot;number&amp;quot; can't be copyrighted.  It might be possible to apply for a trademark or service mark, but you would have a hard time defending it in court. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 16:14, 1 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2000:_xkcd_Phone_2000&amp;diff=158099</id>
		<title>Talk:2000: xkcd Phone 2000</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2000:_xkcd_Phone_2000&amp;diff=158099"/>
				<updated>2018-06-01T16:13:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Copyright, Trademark, Registered Trademark Symbols&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huh, it's not a milestone comic like 1000 was. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.191|172.68.58.191]] 16:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm slightly disappointed honestly [[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.46|172.68.54.46]] 16:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gotta wait for an actual round number, like 0b100000000000 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.127|162.158.111.127]] 16:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well it is the phone 2000 and he does mention in passing asking if 2000 is a good number to choose [[User:Zachweix|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix|talk]]) 16:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What am I waiting for more: 2018 or 2048? [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Waiting for 2018 personally. A comic that has looked at the calendar so many times should be able to see the comic number match the year. [[User:Lukeskylicker|Lukeskylicker]] ([[User talk:Lukeskylicker|talk]]) 17:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think it is pretty clearly a milestone comic. Previous xkcd Phones were timed near iPhone releases. This is very specifically for the 2000th comic. I think it no coincidence that the xkcd Phone 2000 was released for the 2000th one, and think it should be mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.28|162.158.63.28]] 18:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was disappointed, was expecting a 1000-style comic. [[User:JayPlaysBeamNG|JayPlaysBeamNG]] ([[User talk:JayPlaysBeamNG|talk]]) 19:43, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's just the exact same thing as 1000, which IMHO I don't really want. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.46.41|172.68.46.41]] 20:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It might be worth noting, that mouse cursors were a thing on BlackBerry smartphones. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.100|162.158.202.100]] 17:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those had the weird double-screens, where you could lightly drag your finger around and the cursor would follow, and if you pushed hard it would click. Most people found it to be annoying at best, IIRC. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.165|162.158.74.165]] 18:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They actually still work on Android if you pair a mouse with the phone (at least, last I tried it). This was actually annoying - my Apple Magic Mouse prefers to pair to my Android Phone than to my Macbook Pro! [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would buy it just to be able to plug a keyboard into the type A port. I hate the USB host-peripheral thing... My phone is more than capable of handling external devices. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't you like USB OTG or type C adaptors? Bluetooth keyboards should actually work with many Android (or Windows Mobile) devices. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Most Android phones accept keyboard/mouse/pendrive/whatever standard USB peripheral through its USB, some are able to power them, for others you need to provide an external power source. For my old Moto Droid 4, I connected OTG adapter to a USB hub and there one self-made male-male cable for power and rest for peripherals :) As soon as you connect a mouse, the pointer appears. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.215.103|172.68.215.103]] 07:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The issue is you need the adapter. I hope to get an OTG adapter someday, but it is just annoying to have to carry an adapter around (Thank goodness I still have a headphone jack...)I am really hoping type C just cleans up the mess, considering a lot of phones have more power than some old desktops... it just bugs me. 'Course, it would probably not be a priority for the OEM's because 99% won't care. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 15:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think PCB refers to Printed Circuit Board which I assume naturally doesn't contain BPA. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.28|172.68.174.28]] 18:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I edited the explanation to include Printed Circuit Board. I didn't go as far as to remove the alternate explanation, but I think you are correct [[User:Itijara|Itijara]] ([[User talk:Itijara|talk]]) 19:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC) Itijara&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The charging area looks an awful lot like the suggestive violin plots of [[1967:_Violin_Plots]] {{unsigned ip|162.158.186.42 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that even a &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; USB port? it looks like it has one too many pins to me, although i guess maybe it could be a 3.0 port. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.219|172.69.68.219]] 21:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Title text - Our retina display features hundreds of pixels per inch in the central fovea region.&lt;br /&gt;
There is so much language in this and a big error not covered here:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Our'' isn't them, it's us! We all (mostly) have two eyes and the retina collects visual information in pixels.&lt;br /&gt;
*But hundreds of pixels is far too low. The Wiki article {{w|Fovea centralis}} tells me &amp;quot;50 per 100 micrometres in the most central fovea&amp;quot;. This is approximately 12,700 per inch. This would lead to roughly 162 GigaPixels.&lt;br /&gt;
*And then the human eye isn't large as an inch, and the &amp;quot;most central fovea&amp;quot; is much smaller. Maybe Randall will correct the &amp;quot;hundreds of pixels per inch&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless the word ''retina'' is focusing on people who know the ''Apple Retina Display'' but don't know where it comes from. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No comment on &amp;quot;®®™®©™®&amp;quot;?? {{unsigned ip|162.158.74.147}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly hope comic 2001 has a reference to ''2001: A Space Odyssey''. {{unsigned ip|162.158.74.135}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why '''Maggie Haberman'''? Is it just because of her prolific Twitter usage? I'm not aware how that relates to captioning photos, am I missing a reference? {{unsigned|JohnHawkinson}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If comic #404 wasn't counted due to Comic Not Found, it means that this comic is not really #2000, but rather #1999. Probably on Wednesday it will be truly comic #2000. {{unsigned|Xkcdreader52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could &amp;quot;keyboard supports dynamic typing&amp;quot; actually refer to the fact that the keyboard can be used to write different words, and not in fact be locked into writing the same sentence over and over again... A sensible but clearly not marketing material point&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.197|141.101.99.197]] 21:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Sedontane&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted the death mask thing to mean that the phone would edit a picture of you to resemble what you will look like when you die, which would resemble your present state more or less closely depending on how and when that happens. {{unsigned ip| (ip)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two Unicode characters for the letters C and R in circles.  The enclosed C and enclosed R characters are neither superscript or subscript. and registered trademark (&amp;amp;amp;reg;  &amp;amp;reg;) and copyright (&amp;amp;amp;copy; &amp;amp;copy;) are smaller and often superscript.  The copyright symbol should be used in place of enclosed C and the registered trademark symbol should be used instead of enclosed R. All registered trademarks are trademarks.  Not all trademarks are registered copyrights.  Therefore, the two symbols should not be used together.  You should have only one of the symbols (&amp;amp;reg; &amp;amp;trade; &amp;amp;copy;) and it should appear immediately after the item it refers to.  Items can have copyrights, trademarks, and service marks, but not a combination.  Dictionary words, such as &amp;quot;number&amp;quot; can't be copyrighted.  It might be possible to apply for a trademark or service mark, but you would have a hard time defending it in court.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1883:_Supervillain_Plan&amp;diff=144825</id>
		<title>Talk:1883: Supervillain Plan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1883:_Supervillain_Plan&amp;diff=144825"/>
				<updated>2017-08-31T20:46:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Additional nightmare fuel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
California is UTC-8 during the winter, but UTC-7 during the summer. [[User:RandalSchwartz|RandalSchwartz]] ([[User talk:RandalSchwartz|talk]]) 15:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've clarified this. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For some reason, I can't help but to think of this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5wpm-gesOY Tom Scott] video. I guess it represents well the feeling programers must have when talking about time zones. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.100|162.158.126.100]] 16:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it at all clear that Cueball and Megan are &amp;quot;henchmen&amp;quot;? I assumed they were captured heros that were to be put to death, but first the supervillain was confessing his evil plan to them, ala {{tvtropes|EvilGloating}}. [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 18:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think their purely technical concerns would suggest they don't object to the plan itself, they just want to make sure it's as painless for them as possible [[User:Charith|Charith]] ([[User talk:Charith|talk]]) 19:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To me, the position with black hat on a throne and the people opposite him seems more like a villain gloating over his plan. But the heroes this week are programmers (who else would go up against a madman who seems to be building a drone army?) - and when they hear what he's actually planning, the time zone thing becomes their biggest concern. -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.110|162.158.155.110]] 09:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also a nice one for programmers, when governments suddenly decide to change the rules: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34631326 --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.69.177|141.101.69.177]] 20:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:About arizona, [https://www.timeanddate.com/time/us/arizona-no-dst.html the article on timeanddate.com] might be a better explanation.  (The current link is [https://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2012-11-12/daylight-saving-donut-arizona-ken-jennings-maphead]).  [[Special:Contributions/172.68.226.58|172.68.226.58]] 20:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fun fact: this technology can also be used by the good guys to fight the evil. We could move the tectonic plates around to precisely control Earth's moment of inertia, eliminating the need for leap seconds! --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76|172.68.54.76]] 03:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To whoever wrote the sentence starting with &amp;quot;Humans often avoid this issue&amp;quot;: Kudos! Best sentence I read here for a very long time! Plus: something funny to read: http://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 07:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also appreciate the presence of the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; in that sentence - brilliantly placed!  I'm delighted that Randall has raised awareness on this issue, because it gives me a chance to bring up my latest time discovery, Amsterdam time from May, 1 1909 until July 1, 1937, which was [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%2B00:20 GMT +0h 19m 32.13s] (yes - to the hundredth of a second).  My family visited Amsterdam this past summer, and as luck would have it we got to climb the Westertoren, giving me ample opportunity to inform the guides about its special place in timezone management hell (amusing for a church tower)! [[User:Tovodeverett|Tovodeverett]] ([[User talk:Tovodeverett|talk]]) 11:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was working on an application with multiple remote devices measuring temperatures.  The units had internal clocks, but some units were set to change automatically with daylight savings time, some weren't, and some apparently had the wrong dates set for the switchover.  They were also located in two different time zones.  I would have loved to have them all set to UTC and handle the time zone conversion at the central facility.  However, this wasn't really practical as parts of the network were already installed.  However, it was good enough since the real need was to record trends and report when temperatures were above alarm levels.  There is also a time standard that doesn't use leap seconds (TAI).  (This is used for the GPS system.)  I have heard a number of proposals that the timing standard for computer equipment use the time without leap seconds for recording events. http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/systime.html  UTC is TAI with adjustments for leap seconds.  Look at http://gpsworld.com/leap-second-implementation-confuses-some-receivers/ (There were other situations) Some systems had some calculations using UTC and some using TAI, and mistakes in consistency caused some major problems.  [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 20:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1872:_Backup_Batteries&amp;diff=143634</id>
		<title>Talk:1872: Backup Batteries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1872:_Backup_Batteries&amp;diff=143634"/>
				<updated>2017-08-04T22:00:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Weird charging and my reaction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and not delete this comment.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This actually sounds like the classic provisioning situation.  How many spares do you require, and when do you require additional spares.  One of the things that he doesn't mention is whether he carries a USB cord for his phone and USB power supplies for auto and wall outlet use. ( For iPhones, you need one cord for charging the phone and a different cord for charging the power pack.)  I have three power packs in my bag normally.  When one of the power packs is low on power, I plug it into an electrical outlet while using the phone.  I also plug the phone into an electrical outlet when available to prevent the battery from running down.  If at home or a hotel room, I can also have one or two power packs charging while I travel with the phone and the third power pack.  I also charge the phone overnight.  Having multiple power packs doesn't do any good without a means of maintaining them in a charged state.  I typically start the day carrying a charged phone and three charged power packs, which is enough to let me use the phone all day.  At night, I plug all of the devices into electric power.  If I really wanted 24 hour usage or a lot of gaming (games use up the batter faster), I could use six power packs but only carry three with me at a time.  The other three would be charging at a base location.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having too many redundant backup devices can actually reduce the up time of the system.  This was seen at the Superbowl in New Orleans.  http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/9082144/relay-device-malfunction-caused-super-bowl-xlvii-power-outage-according-expert  It is also very dangerous to assume that your backups are adequate and that you don't have to watch the log files.  If somebody had been reading the logs, they would have seen the message that essentially said:  &amp;quot;I have reported two power surges and you haven't told me what to do.  Although these are not individually dangerous, one more power surge before somebody talks to me and I shut down the entire stadium.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimist states that the water glass is half full, while a pessimist states that the water glass is half empty.  What an engineer really does is find out where the water faucet is so that he can refill the glass as needed.  (The original joke says that the engineer states that the glass is twice as large as needed.  This is ridiculous unless he knows how much water is needed and how much is available at the faucet.  The size of this glass is irrelevant unless it is too large to be handled easily or too small to transport water at the required rate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 17:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming he charges the batteries in series (i.e. the second backup charges the first backup which charges the phone, etc.) I wonder how many batteries he'd be able to go through, before the charging/discharging inefficiency (heat generation etc.) meant none of the original power would get to the phone?&lt;br /&gt;
Also I can relate to this comic, when traveling I may bring 2-3 batteries, even though in practice I rarely need more than one 😝😂. 18:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC) {{unsigned ip|108.162.246.11}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the bag turns red when  it falls below 20% batteries...[[User:Jamgard|Jamgard]] ([[User talk:Jamgard|talk]]) 19:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging by https://www.amazon.com/What-charge-discharge-Astro-time/forum/FxE1RP8KJUY0ED/TxVACXPN7AJZ1D/1?_encoding=UTF8&amp;amp;asin=B00M3073L4 and a number of similar entries, charging and discharging a metal hydride battery at the same time seems to be highly undesirable.  Remember that these batteries have a bad habit of exploding if the charging and discharging rates aren't correct.  If there were two batteries in series as you discuss, I believe that my best approach would be to be in another building and have the fire department on speed dial. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 22:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1872:_Backup_Batteries&amp;diff=143618</id>
		<title>Talk:1872: Backup Batteries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1872:_Backup_Batteries&amp;diff=143618"/>
				<updated>2017-08-04T17:21:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Discussion of the provisioning problem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and not delete this comment.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This actually sounds like the classic provisioning situation.  How many spares do you require, and when do you require additional spares.  One of the things that he doesn't mention is whether he carries a USB cord for his phone and USB power supplies for auto and wall outlet use. ( For iPhones, you need one cord for charging the phone and a different cord for charging the power pack.)  I have three power packs in my bag normally.  When one of the power packs is low on power, I plug it into an electrical outlet while using the phone.  I also plug the phone into an electrical outlet when available to prevent the battery from running down.  If at home or a hotel room, I can also have one or two power packs charging while I travel with the phone and the third power pack.  I also charge the phone overnight.  Having multiple power packs doesn't do any good without a means of maintaining them in a charged state.  I typically start the day carrying a charged phone and three charged power packs, which is enough to let me use the phone all day.  At night, I plug all of the devices into electric power.  If I really wanted 24 hour usage or a lot of gaming (games use up the batter faster), I could use six power packs but only carry three with me at a time.  The other three would be charging at a base location.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having too many redundant backup devices can actually reduce the up time of the system.  This was seen at the Superbowl in New Orleans.  http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/9082144/relay-device-malfunction-caused-super-bowl-xlvii-power-outage-according-expert  It is also very dangerous to assume that your backups are adequate and that you don't have to watch the log files.  If somebody had been reading the logs, they would have seen the message that essentially said:  &amp;quot;I have reported two power surges and you haven't told me what to do.  Although these are not individually dangerous, one more power surge before somebody talks to me and I shut down the entire stadium.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An optimist states that the water glass is half full, while a pessimist states that the water glass is half empty.  What an engineer really does is find out where the water faucet is so that he can refill the glass as needed.  (The original joke says that the engineer states that the glass is twice as large as needed.  This is ridiculous unless he knows how much water is needed and how much is available at the faucet.  The size of this glass is irrelevant unless it is too large to be handled easily or too small to transport water at the required rate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 17:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1865:_Wifi_vs_Cellular&amp;diff=142980</id>
		<title>Talk:1865: Wifi vs Cellular</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1865:_Wifi_vs_Cellular&amp;diff=142980"/>
				<updated>2017-07-21T03:02:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Added some information on my experiences&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and not delete this comment.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure it applies in my country. While I have access to cellular internet that is somewhat faster than my home wifi, it is not nearly as reliable for important downloads and definitely several magnitudes costlier when it comes to, say, a Gigabyte of data. [[User:Xenos|Xenos]] ([[User talk:Xenos|talk]]) 05:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heck, it doesn't even apply in my area of the US (rural Maine). We have no cellular connection at all (well, if you stand at a window at the farthest end of the house, sometimes you can make a call), and the Internet connection for our computers is so slow that upgrading a new-to-me laptop to Windows 10 last week took 36 hours. Now I'm trying to add several thousand jpg images to my Google Drive; that takes about 75 minutes per 100 photos. While they're uploading I don't dare visit any other website. Something about keepalive pings not being able to get to the modem, which then shuts down the link altogether. [[User:MaineGrammy|MaineGrammy]] ([[User talk:MaineGrammy|talk]]) 08:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panamax is probably a reference to [[1632]].  [[Special:Contributions/172.68.10.88|172.68.10.88]] 09:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure that home wifi was even a thing that could be used widely by the public in the early 2000s. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 15:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple's AirPort was introduced in 1999. So while it may not have been used widely, it was in use at my house. The graph mentions reliability, not ubiquity. [[User:Neopanamax|Neopanamax]] ([[User talk:Neopanamax|talk]]) 15:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fair enough. I wasn't talking at all about reliability, I genuinely didn't know home wifi was available that early. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 17:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says something about ubiquity, which seems odd in relation to HOME wifi - either you have it or you don't. The performance issue Randall mentions might be the WiFi itself, or might be down to the network; it's common for broadband solutions to be marketed as &amp;quot;up to&amp;quot;, while never achieving close to the advertised speed (either through sharing the connection or range-related drop-off). Case in point, I have an ancient (~2004) ADSL connection that was supposed to be 8Mbit/s, and barely reaches 2; my home wifi (which as it happens I've just updated) isn't the sticking point - the upstream connection is. At some point I'll go optical and fix this, but my ADSL router is currently doing complicated things with IP translation and a fix isn't a trivial drop-in. I can't be the only one with iffy home data. Meanwhile, my cell phone's connection has healthily outperformed my ADSL from the moment it went 4G; I'm actively annoyed that my cell provider recently added a 12GB cap on tethered data, because operating system updates are appreciably faster if I link to my phone. Cellphone connections do have to share the available bandwidth across more users, but on the other hand they're less likely to suffer interference and poorly-implemented devices. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 18:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:ADSL is often limited by physical quality and length of the cable. Most other connections are limited by ISP's price and sharing strategy. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 21:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
802.11n can go up to 600 Mbps, and the routers and cards that support it are very reasonably priced with the advent of 802.11ac. That's not to say that LTE isn't sometimes faster, but it's disingenuous to suggest that WiFi is always slower now. [[User:Stephonovich|Stephonovich]] ([[User talk:Stephonovich|talk]]) 18:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:802.11n and 802.11ac are mostly not fully supported, manufacturers use them only as quasi standards for their own solutions often not compatible to others. But modern LTE is faster than 802.11b/g and the real 802.11n standard.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that if your home network is too stable for this effect, try wifi in some restaurant. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 21:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To get something to load on my computer, sometimes I have to turn on my phone's wifi hotspot (or tethering).  ―[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 18:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See https://www.maketecheasier.com/find-best-wifi-channel/#comments.  One of the problems is that many WiFi routers have their power set to maximum, which means that they can interfere with WiFi networks at fairly large distances.  I also have a suspicion that some ISP providers have misconfigured the routers they supply so that the range of their router looks better even though it causes problems.  (They hope that you will blame the problems on someone else.)  What I haven't decided is whether this is deliberate or simply due to incompetence and lack of diligence. The indication of this is a large number of networks in the display that won't even get to the point of requesting a password.   I have also found that performance varies widely over time. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 03:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142825</id>
		<title>1864: City Nicknames</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142825"/>
				<updated>2017-07-17T17:51:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: /* Nicknames and Demonyms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1864&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 17, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = City Nicknames&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = city_nicknames.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = This place has so many demonyms. Northlanders. Fair Folk. Honey Barons. Lake Dwellers. Treasurers. Swamp Watchers. Dream Farmers. Wellfolk. Rockeaters. Forgotten Royals. Remote Clients. Barrow-Clerks. The People of Land and Sky.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cities often have official or unofficial nicknames. For instance, [[wikipedia:St._Louis|St. Louis, Missouri]], is known as &amp;quot;Gateway to the West&amp;quot; among several other nicknames. The nicknames typically invoke some historical or geographic feature of the city, but can sometime be opaque to those not familiar with the city. [https://www.into-asia.com/bangkok/introduction/fullname.php The full, formal name of Bangkok] includes a long list of superlatives translating as &amp;quot;The city of angels, the great city, the residence of the Emerald Buddha, the impregnable city (of Ayutthaya) of God Indra, the grand capital of the world endowed with nine precious gems, the happy city, abounding in an enormous Royal Palace that resembles the heavenly abode where reigns the reincarnated god, a city given by Indra and built by Vishnukarn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] appears to believe they are near [[wikipedia:New York City|New York City]], despite the skyline being clearly recognizable as St. Louis due to the [[wikipedia:Gateway Arch|Gateway Arch]]. However, the nickname he gives is neither a common New York nickname (such as &amp;quot;[[wikipedia: List of nicknames of New York City|The Big Apple]]&amp;quot;) nor a St. Louis nickname. [[Megan]] tries to correct him, but it becomes clear that Black Hat is making up nicknames. Many of his suggestions are puns for real nicknames of other places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains made up [[wikipedia:Demonym|demonyms]] in the same pattern. A demonym is a word for the people who live in a particular place. They are typically derived from the name of the place (e.g. &amp;quot;St. Louisan&amp;quot; for people from St. Louis), but some regions have an [[wikipedia:Demonym#Informal|informal demonym]] that can be used colloquially by those familiar with the place to refer to its residents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nicknames and Demonyms===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! City nickname in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Hot Tamale&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hot Tamales}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the term [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=big%20enchilada/ The big enchilada.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Winged City&lt;br /&gt;
| The Windy City&lt;br /&gt;
| Chicago. Possibly also [http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/incheon-international-airport/ Incheon International Airport (ICA/RKSI), South Korea]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Gold Trombone&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the gold standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Castleopolis&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cassopolis}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Polis}} (from the Greek πόλις for city) is commonly used as a suffix for city names, like {{w|Minneapolis}} or {{w|Alexandroupolis}}; {{w|Metropolis}} can either be a type of city, or one of the real or fictional cities bearing the name. Appended to the base word &amp;quot;Castle&amp;quot;, this would be the &amp;quot;Castle city&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Kissing Kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sandland&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sandland}} is a village in northern Norway, most likely coincidentally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The High Place&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver is known as the Mile High City &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ol' Ironhook&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Old Ironsides}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A nickname for the USS Constitution (docked in Charlestown, MA). Possibly a conflation of Old Kinderhook (a nickname for US President Martin Van Buren) with Old Ironsides (a nickname for English Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Thousand Spires || The City of a Hundred Spires / City of Dreaming Spires|| Prague / Oxford&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Graveyard of Kings || The Graveyard of Champions || Court 2 at Wimbledon, where former champions are often defeated (the playing environment is very different from Centre Court and Court One, which are larger and where games involving highly-ranked players are preferentially located). The comic was released one day after the 2017 Wimbledon Championships were finished.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bloomtown || [[wikipedia: Boomtown|Boomtown]] || Generic term for a town undergoing rapid growth. Used in the 2002 TV series of the same name as a nickname for Los Angeles.  Might also be referring to [[wikipedia:Bloom County|Bloom County]], a comic by [[wikipedia:Berkeley Breathed|Berkeley Breathed]], or Dublin, as the setting for Ulysses by James Joyce.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lantern City USA || {{w|Tree City USA}} || A designation supporting municipalities that showcase urban forestry, in connection with Arbor Day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Many Daughters || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Big Mauve || [[wikipedia: Big_Red_(drink)|Big Red Soda]] || Big Red Soda.  The Dartmouth football team is the Big Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glass Cradle || [[wikipedia:The Glass Menagerie|The Glass Menagerie]]  || A play by Tennessee Williams&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Road Source ||{{w|Rome}} || From the saying that {{w|All Roads Lead to Rome}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| London Prime || London || In the DC comics, to incorporate multiple continuties, there were multiple universes. London Prime would be &amp;quot;real  London&amp;quot; on Earth Prime. Various cities named {{w|New London}} in the United States and elsewhere are imagined as London in alternate continuities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hamtown || {{w|Hamburg}} || A burg is another name for a city or town, sometimes more specifically a fortified town.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Salad Bowl || || A theory of cultural integration in the US, one that stands in contrast to the older 'Melting Pot' theory. Could also refer to the [[wikipedia: Dust Bowl|Dust Bowl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| God's Boudoir || || Humorous reference similar to &amp;quot;God's Waiting Room&amp;quot; used for the state of Florida, where many elderly retire then expire.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glittering Swamp || [[wikipedia:Great Dismal Swamp|The Great Dismal Swamp ]]  || A large swamp in Virginia and North Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Steel Forest || The Concrete Jungle || The Concrete Jungle is a name often given to New York's Manhattan area.  There was also a book and movie entitled The Petrified Forest. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Mobius Strip || The Strip || The Strip is a shortened and commonly used name for the Las Vegas Strip, the main area of hotels and casinos in Las Vegas, Nevada. A {{w|Mobius strip}} is a one-sided piece of paper created by rotating the short edge of the strip 180 degrees and attaching it to the other short edge. The Vegas strip has more or less only one side as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Land of Trains and Fog || || In the webcomic [[wikipedia:Homestuck  | Homestuck]] many events take place on various planets named in the format &amp;quot;The Land of X and Y&amp;quot;, e.g. &amp;quot;The Land of Light and Rain&amp;quot;. The novel by George R.R. Martin, which was made into ''Game of Thrones'', was called ''A Song of Ice and Fire''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meeting Place || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Dark Star || || Dark Star is a 1974 science fiction comedy film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Walled Garden || {{w|Walled garden (technology)}} || A walled garden is a virtual environment where the user can only view content that is published or permitted by the proprietor, e.g. AOL or Facebook. This could also be a reference to walled cities, e.g. from the Middle Ages, or the {{w|Kowloon Walled City}} in the modern era.  The Secret Garden was a book.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Skin City || [[wikipedia:Sin City (description)|Sin City]] || Generic term for a city well known for gambling, drugs, or other vices. Also Las Vegas.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Horse Rotary || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Turkeytown || Turkeytown || A town in Lincoln County, Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Naked Towers || || The Naked City was a television series.  The Two Towers is a book by Tolkien, and Naked Lunch is a book by Burroughs &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meta-City || Metacity || A term for a heterogenous, sprawling urban center with multiple dense centers, such as Tokyo or New York City. Metacity was also the window manager in the Linux GNOME 2 desktop.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Urban Orb || || The screenname of a Let's Player on Youtube and Twitch. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Angles || City of Angels || Los Angeles. Also, the titular City of Angles in the web novel [http://stefangagne.com/cityofangles/ City of Angles].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Big Wheel || || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bird City USA || || A program started by the Audubon Society. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Seven Crowns || City of Seven Hills || Rome&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hilltopia ||The Hilltop || May be reference to The Hilltop in AMC's The Walking Dead&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bug City || || A nickname for the bug-infested Chicago in the roleplaying game Shadowrun. Also, a sourcebook for the game.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Bottomless Cup || || There are many mentions of Bottomless Pits in stories. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lorde's Fen || Lord's Fen || [[wikipedia:Lorde| Lorde]] is a musical artist from Herne Bay, New Zealand - an area near Waitemata Harbour. A [[wikipedia:Fen| Fen]] is a type of wetland, which could loosely connect to Herne Bay. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Last Town || || The third book in the Wayward Pines series. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Empty Set || || The concert hall in the video game Transistor. In mathematics, the {{w|empty set}} refers to an unique set with no elements, often notated as &amp;quot;{}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;∅&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ghost Harbor || || The name for a brewing company in North Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Demonym in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Northlanders || Highlanders || Maybe a reference to the people of the {{w|Scottish Highlands}}, with a similar demonym. The &amp;quot;High&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;Highlands&amp;quot; is a reference to the mountainous landscape, not the geographical position. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fair Folk || || The elves in ''The Lord of the Rings'' are referred to as the 'fair folk'. The fair folk is also more generally used as a name for fairies in folklore.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Honey Barons || [[wikipedia: Robber_baron_(industrialist) | Robber Barons]] || Possibly a reference to The Robber Barons, a group of powerful industrialists in the late 1800's known for questionable business ethics. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lake Dwellers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Treasurers || || A {{w|treasurer}} is a person in charge of running the treasury of an organization, for example a governmental department.  The Auditors were characters in the Pratchett Discworld books who wanted to simplify the universe by destroying it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Swamp Watchers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dream Farmers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wellfolk || Werefolk || The were folk were people who could change into animals:  e.g. werewolves.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rockeaters || [[Wikipedia:List_of_The_Neverending_Story_characters#Pyornkrachzark_and_the_other_messengers| Rockbiter]] || In the Never Ending Story, Pyornkrachzark, more commonly known as &amp;quot;Rock Biter&amp;quot; is a large creature made completely of stone, named due to their diet of rocks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Forgotten Royals || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Remote Clients || [[wikipedia:Remote_computer|Remote computer client]] || In computing, a remote client is a program used to access a computer or service over the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Barrow-Clerks || [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-wights Barrow-wights] || Creatures in &amp;quot;The Lord of the Rings&amp;quot; that resemble wraiths. The Hobbits come across them in the [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-downs Barrow-downs].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The People of Land and Sky || [[wikipedia:Sea_Peoples|Sea Peoples]] ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are standing on a hill overlooking a city. The Gateway Arch is visible, as well as a number of skyscrapers in the skyline.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Ah, New York. The Hot Tamale.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is St. Louis. Also, that's not–&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Winged City. The Gold Trombone. Castleopolis.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: It's none of those.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Kissing Kingdom. Sandland. The High Place. Ol' Ironhook.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Still wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Thousand Spires. The Graveyard of Kings. Bloomtown. Lantern City USA.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Please stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are walking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The City of Many Daughters. Big Mauve. The Glass Cradle. The Road Source. London Prime. Hamtown. The Salad Bowl. God's Boudoir. The Glittering Swamp. The Steel Forest. The Mobius Strip. The Land of Trains and Fog. The Meeting Place. The Dark Star. The Walled Garden. Skin City. The Horse Rotary. Turkeytown. The Naked Towers. The Meta-City. The Urban Orb. The City of Angles. The Big Wheel. Bird City USA. The City of Seven Crowns. Hilltopia. Bug City. The Bottomless Cup. [Text size getting smaller] Lorde's Fen. The Last Town. The Empty Set. Ghost Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How long does this last?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: No city has ever let him stay long enough to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142819</id>
		<title>1864: City Nicknames</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142819"/>
				<updated>2017-07-17T17:33:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: /* Nicknames and Demonyms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1864&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 17, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = City Nicknames&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = city_nicknames.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = This place has so many demonyms. Northlanders. Fair Folk. Honey Barons. Lake Dwellers. Treasurers. Swamp Watchers. Dream Farmers. Wellfolk. Rockeaters. Forgotten Royals. Remote Clients. Barrow-Clerks. The People of Land and Sky.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cities often have official or unofficial nicknames. For instance, [[wikipedia:St._Louis|St. Louis, Missouri]], is known as &amp;quot;Gateway to the West&amp;quot; among several other nicknames. The nicknames typically invoke some historical or geographic feature of the city, but can sometime be opaque to those not familiar with the city. [https://www.into-asia.com/bangkok/introduction/fullname.php The full, formal name of Bangkok] includes a long list of superlatives translating as &amp;quot;The city of angels, the great city, the residence of the Emerald Buddha, the impregnable city (of Ayutthaya) of God Indra, the grand capital of the world endowed with nine precious gems, the happy city, abounding in an enormous Royal Palace that resembles the heavenly abode where reigns the reincarnated god, a city given by Indra and built by Vishnukarn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] appears to believe they are near [[wikipedia:New York City|New York City]], despite the skyline being clearly recognizable as St. Louis due to the [[wikipedia:Gateway Arch|Gateway Arch]]. However, the nickname he gives is neither a common New York nickname (such as &amp;quot;[[wikipedia: List of nicknames of New York City|The Big Apple]]&amp;quot;) nor a St. Louis nickname. [[Megan]] tries to correct him, but it becomes clear that Black Hat is making up nicknames. Many of his suggestions are puns for real nicknames of other places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains made up [[wikipedia:Demonym|demonyms]] in the same pattern. A demonym is a word for the people who live in a particular place. They are typically derived from the name of the place (e.g. &amp;quot;St. Louisan&amp;quot; for people from St. Louis), but some regions have an [[wikipedia:Demonym#Informal|informal demonym]] that can be used colloquially by those familiar with the place to refer to its residents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nicknames and Demonyms===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! City nickname in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Hot Tamale&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hot Tamales}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the term [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=big%20enchilada/ The big enchilada.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Winged City&lt;br /&gt;
| The Windy City&lt;br /&gt;
| Chicago. Possibly also [http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/incheon-international-airport/ Incheon International Airport (ICA/RKSI), South Korea]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Gold Trombone&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the gold standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Castleopolis&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cassopolis}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Polis}} (from the Greek πόλις for city) is commonly used as a suffix for city names, like {{w|Minneapolis}} or {{w|Alexandroupolis}}; {{w|Metropolis}} can either be a type of city, or one of the real or fictional cities bearing the name. Appended to the base word &amp;quot;Castle&amp;quot;, this would be the &amp;quot;Castle city&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Kissing Kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sandland&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sandland}} is a village in northern Norway, most likely coincidentally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The High Place&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver is known as the Mile High City &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ol' Ironhook&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Old Ironsides}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A nickname for the USS Constitution (docked in Charlestown, MA). Possibly a conflation of Old Kinderhook (a nickname for US President Martin Van Buren) with Old Ironsides (a nickname for English Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Thousand Spires || The City of a Hundred Spires / City of Dreaming Spires|| Prague / Oxford&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Graveyard of Kings || The Graveyard of Champions || Court 2 at Wimbledon, where former champions are often defeated (the playing environment is very different from Centre Court and Court One, which are larger and where games involving highly-ranked players are preferentially located). The comic was released one day after the 2017 Wimbledon Championships were finished.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bloomtown || [[wikipedia: Boomtown|Boomtown]] || Generic term for a town undergoing rapid growth. Used in the 2002 TV series of the same name as a nickname for Los Angeles.  Might also be referring to [[wikipedia:Bloom County|Bloom County]], a comic by [[wikipedia:Berkeley Breathed|Berkeley Breathed]], or Dublin, as the setting for Ulysses by James Joyce.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lantern City USA || {{w|Tree City USA}} || A designation supporting municipalities that showcase urban forestry, in connection with Arbor Day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Many Daughters || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Big Mauve || [[wikipedia: Big_Red_(drink)|Big Red Soda]] || Big Red Soda.  The Dartmouth football team is the Big Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glass Cradle || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Road Source ||{{w|Rome}} || From the saying that {{w|All Roads Lead to Rome}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| London Prime || London || In the DC comics, to incorporate multiple continuties, there were multiple universes. London Prime would be &amp;quot;real  London&amp;quot; on Earth Prime. Various cities named {{w|New London}} in the United States and elsewhere are imagined as London in alternate continuities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hamtown || {{w|Hamburg}} || A burg is another name for a city or town, sometimes more specifically a fortified town.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Salad Bowl || || A theory of cultural integration in the US, one that stands in contrast to the older 'Melting Pot' theory. Could also refer to the [[wikipedia: Dust Bowl|Dust Bowl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| God's Boudoir || || Humorous reference similar to &amp;quot;God's Waiting Room&amp;quot; used for the state of Florida, where many elderly retire then expire.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glittering Swamp || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Steel Forest || The Concrete Jungle || The Concrete Jungle is a name often given to New York's Manhattan area.  There was also a book and movie entitled The Petrified Forest. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Mobius Strip || The Strip || The Strip is a shortened and commonly used name for the Las Vegas Strip, the main area of hotels and casinos in Las Vegas, Nevada. A {{w|Mobius strip}} is a one-sided piece of paper created by rotating the short edge of the strip 180 degrees and attaching it to the other short edge. The Vegas strip has more or less only one side as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Land of Trains and Fog || || In the webcomic [[wikipedia:Homestuck  | Homestuck]] many events take place on various planets named in the format &amp;quot;The Land of X and Y&amp;quot;, e.g. &amp;quot;The Land of Light and Rain&amp;quot;. The novel by George R.R. Martin, which was made into ''Game of Thrones'', was called ''A Song of Ice and Fire''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meeting Place || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Dark Star || || Dark Star is a 1974 science fiction comedy film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Walled Garden || {{w|Walled garden (technology)}} || A walled garden is a virtual environment where the user can only view content that is published or permitted by the proprietor, e.g. AOL or Facebook. This could also be a reference to walled cities, e.g. from the Middle Ages, or the {{w|Kowloon Walled City}} in the modern era.  The Secret Garden was a book.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Skin City || [[wikipedia:Sin City (description)|Sin City]] || Generic term for a city well known for gambling, drugs, or other vices. Also Las Vegas.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Horse Rotary || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Turkeytown || Turkeytown || A town in Lincoln County, Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Naked Towers || || The Naked City was a television series.  The Two Towers is a book by Tolkien, and Naked Lunch is a book by Burroughs &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meta-City || Metacity || A term for a heterogenous, sprawling urban center with multiple dense centers, such as Tokyo or New York City. Metacity was also the window manager in the Linux GNOME 2 desktop.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Urban Orb || || The screenname of a Let's Player on Youtube and Twitch. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Angles || City of Angels || Los Angeles. Also, the titular City of Angles in the web novel [http://stefangagne.com/cityofangles/ City of Angles].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Big Wheel || || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bird City USA || || A program started by the Audubon Society. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Seven Crowns || City of Seven Hills || Rome&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hilltopia ||The Hilltop || May be reference to The Hilltop in AMC's The Walking Dead&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bug City || || A nickname for the bug-infested Chicago in the roleplaying game Shadowrun. Also, a sourcebook for the game.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Bottomless Cup || || There are many mentions of Bottomless Pits in stories. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lorde's Fen || Lord's Fen || [[wikipedia:Lorde| Lorde]] is a musical artist from Herne Bay, New Zealand - an area near Waitemata Harbour. A [[wikipedia:Fen| Fen]] is a type of wetland, which could loosely connect to Herne Bay. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Last Town || || The third book in the Wayward Pines series. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Empty Set || || The concert hall in the video game Transistor. In mathematics, the {{w|empty set}} refers to an unique set with no elements, often notated as &amp;quot;{}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;∅&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ghost Harbor || || The name for a brewing company in North Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Demonym in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Northlanders || Highlanders || Maybe a reference to the people of the {{w|Scottish Highlands}}, with a similar demonym. The &amp;quot;High&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;Highlands&amp;quot; is a reference to the mountainous landscape, not the geographical position. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fair Folk || || The elves in ''The Lord of the Rings'' are referred to as the 'fair folk'. The fair folk is also more generally used as a name for fairies in folklore.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Honey Barons || [[wikipedia: Robber_baron_(industrialist) | Robber Barons]] || Possibly a reference to The Robber Barons, a group of powerful industrialists in the late 1800's known for questionable business ethics. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lake Dwellers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Treasurers || || A {{w|treasurer}} is a person in charge of running the treasury of an organization, for example a governmental department.  The Auditors were characters in the Pratchett Discworld books who wanted to simplify the universe by destroying it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Swamp Watchers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dream Farmers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wellfolk || Werefolk || The were folk were people who could change into animals:  e.g. werewolves.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rockeaters || [[Wikipedia:List_of_The_Neverending_Story_characters#Pyornkrachzark_and_the_other_messengers| Rockbiter]] || In the Never Ending Story, Pyornkrachzark, more commonly known as &amp;quot;Rock Biter&amp;quot; is a large creature made completely of stone, named due to their diet of rocks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Forgotten Royals || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Remote Clients || [[wikipedia:Remote_computer|Remote computer client]] || In computing, a remote client is a program used to access a computer or service over the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Barrow-Clerks || [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-wights Barrow-wights] || Creatures in &amp;quot;The Lord of the Rings&amp;quot; that resemble wraiths. The Hobbits come across them in the [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-downs Barrow-downs].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The People of Land and Sky || [[wikipedia:Sea_Peoples|Sea Peoples]] ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are standing on a hill overlooking a city. The Gateway Arch is visible, as well as a number of skyscrapers in the skyline.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Ah, New York. The Hot Tamale.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is St. Louis. Also, that's not–&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Winged City. The Gold Trombone. Castleopolis.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: It's none of those.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Kissing Kingdom. Sandland. The High Place. Ol' Ironhook.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Still wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Thousand Spires. The Graveyard of Kings. Bloomtown. Lantern City USA.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Please stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are walking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The City of Many Daughters. Big Mauve. The Glass Cradle. The Road Source. London Prime. Hamtown. The Salad Bowl. God's Boudoir. The Glittering Swamp. The Steel Forest. The Mobius Strip. The Land of Trains and Fog. The Meeting Place. The Dark Star. The Walled Garden. Skin City. The Horse Rotary. Turkeytown. The Naked Towers. The Meta-City. The Urban Orb. The City of Angles. The Big Wheel. Bird City USA. The City of Seven Crowns. Hilltopia. Bug City. The Bottomless Cup. [Text size getting smaller] Lorde's Fen. The Last Town. The Empty Set. Ghost Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How long does this last?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: No city has ever let him stay long enough to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142818</id>
		<title>1864: City Nicknames</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142818"/>
				<updated>2017-07-17T17:31:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: /* Nicknames and Demonyms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1864&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 17, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = City Nicknames&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = city_nicknames.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = This place has so many demonyms. Northlanders. Fair Folk. Honey Barons. Lake Dwellers. Treasurers. Swamp Watchers. Dream Farmers. Wellfolk. Rockeaters. Forgotten Royals. Remote Clients. Barrow-Clerks. The People of Land and Sky.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cities often have official or unofficial nicknames. For instance, [[wikipedia:St._Louis|St. Louis, Missouri]], is known as &amp;quot;Gateway to the West&amp;quot; among several other nicknames. The nicknames typically invoke some historical or geographic feature of the city, but can sometime be opaque to those not familiar with the city. [https://www.into-asia.com/bangkok/introduction/fullname.php The full, formal name of Bangkok] includes a long list of superlatives translating as &amp;quot;The city of angels, the great city, the residence of the Emerald Buddha, the impregnable city (of Ayutthaya) of God Indra, the grand capital of the world endowed with nine precious gems, the happy city, abounding in an enormous Royal Palace that resembles the heavenly abode where reigns the reincarnated god, a city given by Indra and built by Vishnukarn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] appears to believe they are near [[wikipedia:New York City|New York City]], despite the skyline being clearly recognizable as St. Louis due to the [[wikipedia:Gateway Arch|Gateway Arch]]. However, the nickname he gives is neither a common New York nickname (such as &amp;quot;[[wikipedia: List of nicknames of New York City|The Big Apple]]&amp;quot;) nor a St. Louis nickname. [[Megan]] tries to correct him, but it becomes clear that Black Hat is making up nicknames. Many of his suggestions are puns for real nicknames of other places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains made up [[wikipedia:Demonym|demonyms]] in the same pattern. A demonym is a word for the people who live in a particular place. They are typically derived from the name of the place (e.g. &amp;quot;St. Louisan&amp;quot; for people from St. Louis), but some regions have an [[wikipedia:Demonym#Informal|informal demonym]] that can be used colloquially by those familiar with the place to refer to its residents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nicknames and Demonyms===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! City nickname in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Hot Tamale&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hot Tamales}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the term [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=big%20enchilada/ The big enchilada.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Winged City&lt;br /&gt;
| The Windy City&lt;br /&gt;
| Chicago. Possibly also [http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/incheon-international-airport/ Incheon International Airport (ICA/RKSI), South Korea]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Gold Trombone&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the gold standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Castleopolis&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cassopolis}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Polis}} (from the Greek πόλις for city) is commonly used as a suffix for city names, like {{w|Minneapolis}} or {{w|Alexandroupolis}}; {{w|Metropolis}} can either be a type of city, or one of the real or fictional cities bearing the name. Appended to the base word &amp;quot;Castle&amp;quot;, this would be the &amp;quot;Castle city&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Kissing Kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sandland&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sandland}} is a village in northern Norway, most likely coincidentally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The High Place&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver is known as the Mile High City &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ol' Ironhook&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Old Ironsides}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A nickname for the USS Constitution (docked in Charlestown, MA). Possibly a conflation of Old Kinderhook (a nickname for US President Martin Van Buren) with Old Ironsides (a nickname for English Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Thousand Spires || The City of a Hundred Spires / City of Dreaming Spires|| Prague / Oxford&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Graveyard of Kings || The Graveyard of Champions || Court 2 at Wimbledon, where former champions are often defeated (the playing environment is very different from Centre Court and Court One, which are larger and where games involving highly-ranked players are preferentially located). The comic was released one day after the 2017 Wimbledon Championships were finished.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bloomtown || [[wikipedia: Boomtown|Boomtown]] || Generic term for a town undergoing rapid growth. Used in the 2002 TV series of the same name as a nickname for Los Angeles.  Might also be referring to [[wikipedia:Bloom County|Bloom County]], a comic by [[wikipedia:Berkeley Breathed|Berkeley Breathed]], or Dublin, as the setting for Ulysses by James Joyce.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lantern City USA || {{w|Tree City USA}} || A designation supporting municipalities that showcase urban forestry, in connection with Arbor Day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Many Daughters || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Big Mauve || [[wikipedia: Big_Red_(drink)|Big Red Soda]] || Big Red Soda.  The Dartmouth football team is the Big Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glass Cradle || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Road Source ||{{w|Rome}} || From the saying that {{w|All Roads Lead to Rome}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| London Prime || London || In the DC comics, to incorporate multiple continuties, there were multiple universes. London Prime would be &amp;quot;real  London&amp;quot; on Earth Prime. Various cities named {{w|New London}} in the United States and elsewhere are imagined as London in alternate continuities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hamtown || {{w|Hamburg}} || A burg is another name for a city or town, sometimes more specifically a fortified town.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Salad Bowl || || A theory of cultural integration in the US, one that stands in contrast to the older 'Melting Pot' theory. Could also refer to the [[wikipedia: Dust Bowl|Dust Bowl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| God's Boudoir || || Humorous reference similar to &amp;quot;God's Waiting Room&amp;quot; used for the state of Florida, where many elderly retire then expire.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glittering Swamp || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Steel Forest || The Concrete Jungle || The Concrete Jungle is a name often given to New York's Manhattan area.  There was also a book and movie entitled The Petrified Forest. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Mobius Strip || The Strip || The Strip is a shortened and commonly used name for the Las Vegas Strip, the main area of hotels and casinos in Las Vegas, Nevada. A {{w|Mobius strip}} is a one-sided piece of paper created by rotating the short edge of the strip 180 degrees and attaching it to the other short edge. The Vegas strip has more or less only one side as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Land of Trains and Fog || || In the webcomic [[wikipedia:Homestuck  | Homestuck]] many events take place on various planets named in the format &amp;quot;The Land of X and Y&amp;quot;, e.g. &amp;quot;The Land of Light and Rain&amp;quot;. The novel by George R.R. Martin, which was made into ''Game of Thrones'', was called ''A Song of Ice and Fire''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meeting Place || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Dark Star || || Dark Star is a 1974 science fiction comedy film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Walled Garden || {{w|Walled garden (technology)}} || A walled garden is a virtual environment where the user can only view content that is published or permitted by the proprietor, e.g. AOL or Facebook. This could also be a reference to walled cities, e.g. from the Middle Ages, or the {{w|Kowloon Walled City}} in the modern era.  The Secret Garden was a book.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Skin City || [[wikipedia:Sin City (description)|Sin City]] || Generic term for a city well known for gambling, drugs, or other vices. Also Las Vegas.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Horse Rotary || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Turkeytown || Turkeytown || A town in Lincoln County, Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Naked Towers || || The Naked City was a television series.  The Two Towers is a book by Tolkien, and Naked Lunch is a book by Burroughs &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meta-City || Metacity || A term for a heterogenous, sprawling urban center with multiple dense centers, such as Tokyo or New York City. Metacity was also the window manager in the Linux GNOME 2 desktop.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Urban Orb || || The screenname of a Let's Player on Youtube and Twitch. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Angles || City of Angels || Los Angeles. Also, the titular City of Angles in the web novel [http://stefangagne.com/cityofangles/ City of Angles].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Big Wheel || || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bird City USA || || A program started by the Audubon Society. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Seven Crowns || City of Seven Hills || Rome&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hilltopia ||The Hilltop || May be reference to The Hilltop in AMC's The Walking Dead&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bug City || || A nickname for the bug-infested Chicago in the roleplaying game Shadowrun. Also, a sourcebook for the game.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Bottomless Cup || || There are many mentions of Bottomless Pits in stories. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lorde's Fen || Lord's Fen || [[wikipedia:Lorde| Lorde]] is a musical artist from Herne Bay, New Zealand - an area near Waitemata Harbour. A [[wikipedia:Fen| Fen]] is a type of wetland, which could loosely connect to Herne Bay. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Last Town || || The third book in the Wayward Pines series. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Empty Set || || The concert hall in the video game Transistor. In mathematics, the {{w|empty set}} refers to an unique set with no elements, often notated as &amp;quot;{}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;∅&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ghost Harbor || || The name for a brewing company in North Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Demonym in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Northlanders || Highlanders || Maybe a reference to the people of the {{w|Scottish Highlands}}, with a similar demonym. The &amp;quot;High&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;Highlands&amp;quot; is a reference to the mountainous landscape, not the geographical position. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fair Folk || || The elves in ''The Lord of the Rings'' are referred to as the 'fair folk'. The fair folk is also more generally used as a name for fairies in folklore.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Honey Barons || [[wikipedia: Robber_baron_(industrialist) | Robber Barons]] || Possibly a reference to The Robber Barons, a group of powerful industrialists in the late 1800's known for questionable known for questionable business ethics. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lake Dwellers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Treasurers || || A {{w|treasurer}} is a person in charge of running the treasury of an organization, for example a governmental department.  The Auditors were characters in the Pratchett Discworld books who wanted to simplify the universe by destroying it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Swamp Watchers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dream Farmers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wellfolk || Werefolk || The were folk were people who could change into animals:  e.g. werewolves.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rockeaters || [[Wikipedia:List_of_The_Neverending_Story_characters#Pyornkrachzark_and_the_other_messengers| Rockbiter]] || In the Never Ending Story, Pyornkrachzark, more commonly known as &amp;quot;Rock Biter&amp;quot; is a large creature made completely of stone, named due to their diet of rocks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Forgotten Royals || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Remote Clients || [[wikipedia:Remote_computer|Remote computer client]] || In computing, a remote client is a program used to access a computer or service over the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Barrow-Clerks || [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-wights Barrow-wights] || Creatures in &amp;quot;The Lord of the Rings&amp;quot; that resemble wraiths. The Hobbits come across them in the [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-downs Barrow-downs].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The People of Land and Sky || [[wikipedia:Sea_Peoples|Sea Peoples]] ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are standing on a hill overlooking a city. The Gateway Arch is visible, as well as a number of skyscrapers in the skyline.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Ah, New York. The Hot Tamale.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is St. Louis. Also, that's not–&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Winged City. The Gold Trombone. Castleopolis.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: It's none of those.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Kissing Kingdom. Sandland. The High Place. Ol' Ironhook.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Still wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Thousand Spires. The Graveyard of Kings. Bloomtown. Lantern City USA.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Please stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are walking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The City of Many Daughters. Big Mauve. The Glass Cradle. The Road Source. London Prime. Hamtown. The Salad Bowl. God's Boudoir. The Glittering Swamp. The Steel Forest. The Mobius Strip. The Land of Trains and Fog. The Meeting Place. The Dark Star. The Walled Garden. Skin City. The Horse Rotary. Turkeytown. The Naked Towers. The Meta-City. The Urban Orb. The City of Angles. The Big Wheel. Bird City USA. The City of Seven Crowns. Hilltopia. Bug City. The Bottomless Cup. [Text size getting smaller] Lorde's Fen. The Last Town. The Empty Set. Ghost Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How long does this last?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: No city has ever let him stay long enough to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142817</id>
		<title>1864: City Nicknames</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1864:_City_Nicknames&amp;diff=142817"/>
				<updated>2017-07-17T17:23:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: /* Nicknames and Demonyms */  Added a few items&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1864&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 17, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = City Nicknames&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = city_nicknames.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = This place has so many demonyms. Northlanders. Fair Folk. Honey Barons. Lake Dwellers. Treasurers. Swamp Watchers. Dream Farmers. Wellfolk. Rockeaters. Forgotten Royals. Remote Clients. Barrow-Clerks. The People of Land and Sky.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cities often have official or unofficial nicknames. For instance, [[wikipedia:St._Louis|St. Louis, Missouri]], is known as &amp;quot;Gateway to the West&amp;quot; among several other nicknames. The nicknames typically invoke some historical or geographic feature of the city, but can sometime be opaque to those not familiar with the city. [https://www.into-asia.com/bangkok/introduction/fullname.php The full, formal name of Bangkok] includes a long list of superlatives translating as &amp;quot;The city of angels, the great city, the residence of the Emerald Buddha, the impregnable city (of Ayutthaya) of God Indra, the grand capital of the world endowed with nine precious gems, the happy city, abounding in an enormous Royal Palace that resembles the heavenly abode where reigns the reincarnated god, a city given by Indra and built by Vishnukarn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] appears to believe they are near [[wikipedia:New York City|New York City]], despite the skyline being clearly recognizable as St. Louis due to the [[wikipedia:Gateway Arch|Gateway Arch]]. However, the nickname he gives is neither a common New York nickname (such as &amp;quot;[[wikipedia: List of nicknames of New York City|The Big Apple]]&amp;quot;) nor a St. Louis nickname. [[Megan]] tries to correct him, but it becomes clear that Black Hat is making up nicknames. Many of his suggestions are puns for real nicknames of other places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains made up [[wikipedia:Demonym|demonyms]] in the same pattern. A demonym is a word for the people who live in a particular place. They are typically derived from the name of the place (e.g. &amp;quot;St. Louisan&amp;quot; for people from St. Louis), but some regions have an [[wikipedia:Demonym#Informal|informal demonym]] that can be used colloquially by those familiar with the place to refer to its residents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nicknames and Demonyms===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! City nickname in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Hot Tamale&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hot Tamales}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the term [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=big%20enchilada/ The big enchilada.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Winged City&lt;br /&gt;
| The Windy City&lt;br /&gt;
| Chicago. Possibly also [http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/incheon-international-airport/ Incheon International Airport (ICA/RKSI), South Korea]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Gold Trombone&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a reference to the gold standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Castleopolis&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cassopolis}}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Polis}} (from the Greek πόλις for city) is commonly used as a suffix for city names, like {{w|Minneapolis}} or {{w|Alexandroupolis}}; {{w|Metropolis}} can either be a type of city, or one of the real or fictional cities bearing the name. Appended to the base word &amp;quot;Castle&amp;quot;, this would be the &amp;quot;Castle city&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Kissing Kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sandland&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sandland}} is a village in northern Norway, most likely coincidentally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The High Place&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver is known as the Mile High City &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ol' Ironhook&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Old Ironsides}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A nickname for the USS Constitution (docked in Charlestown, MA). Possibly a conflation of Old Kinderhook (a nickname for US President Martin Van Buren) with Old Ironsides (a nickname for English Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Thousand Spires || The City of a Hundred Spires / City of Dreaming Spires|| Prague / Oxford&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Graveyard of Kings || The Graveyard of Champions || Court 2 at Wimbledon, where former champions are often defeated (the playing environment is very different from Centre Court and Court One, which are larger and where games involving highly-ranked players are preferentially located). The comic was released one day after the 2017 Wimbledon Championships were finished.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bloomtown || [[wikipedia: Boomtown|Boomtown]] || Generic term for a town undergoing rapid growth. Used in the 2002 TV series of the same name as a nickname for Los Angeles.  Might also be referring to [[wikipedia:Bloom County|Bloom County]], a comic by [[wikipedia:Berkeley Breathed|Berkeley Breathed]], or Dublin, as the setting for Ulysses by James Joyce.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lantern City USA || {{w|Tree City USA}} || A designation supporting municipalities that showcase urban forestry, in connection with Arbor Day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Many Daughters || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Big Mauve || [[wikipedia: Big_Red_(drink)|Big Red Soda]] || Big Red Soda.  The Dartmouth football team is the Big Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glass Cradle || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Road Source ||{{w|Rome}} || From the saying that {{w|All Roads Lead to Rome}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| London Prime || London || In the DC comics, to incorporate multiple continuties, there were multiple universes. London Prime would be &amp;quot;real  London&amp;quot; on Earth Prime. Various cities named {{w|New London}} in the United States and elsewhere are imagined as London in alternate continuities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hamtown || {{w|Hamburg}} || A burg is another name for a city or town, sometimes more specifically a fortified town.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Salad Bowl || || A theory of cultural integration in the US, one that stands in contrast to the older 'Melting Pot' theory. Could also refer to the [[wikipedia: Dust Bowl|Dust Bowl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| God's Boudoir || || Humorous reference similar to &amp;quot;God's Waiting Room&amp;quot; used for the state of Florida, where many elderly retire then expire.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Glittering Swamp || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Steel Forest || The Concrete Jungle || The Concrete Jungle is a name often given to New York's Manhattan area.  There was also a book and movie entitled The Petrified Forest. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Mobius Strip || The Strip || The Strip is a shortened and commonly used name for the Las Vegas Strip, the main area of hotels and casinos in Las Vegas, Nevada. A {{w|Mobius strip}} is a one-sided piece of paper created by rotating the short edge of the strip 180 degrees and attaching it to the other short edge. The Vegas strip has more or less only one side as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Land of Trains and Fog || || In the webcomic [[wikipedia:Homestuck  | Homestuck]] many events take place on various planets named in the format &amp;quot;The Land of X and Y&amp;quot;, e.g. &amp;quot;The Land of Light and Rain&amp;quot;. The novel by George R.R. Martin, which was made into ''Game of Thrones'', was called ''A Song of Ice and Fire''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meeting Place || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Dark Star || || Dark Star is a 1974 science fiction comedy film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Walled Garden || {{w|Walled garden (technology)}} || A walled garden is a virtual environment where the user can only view content that is published or permitted by the proprietor, e.g. AOL or Facebook. This could also be a reference to walled cities, e.g. from the Middle Ages, or the {{w|Kowloon Walled City}} in the modern era.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Skin City || [[wikipedia:Sin City (description)|Sin City]] || Generic term for a city well known for gambling, drugs, or other vices. Also Las Vegas.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Horse Rotary || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Turkeytown || Turkeytown || A town in Lincoln County, Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Naked Towers || || The Naked City was a television series.  The Two Towers is a book by Tolkien, and Naked Lunch is a book by Burroughs &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Meta-City || Metacity || A term for a heterogenous, sprawling urban center with multiple dense centers, such as Tokyo or New York City. Metacity was also the window manager in the Linux GNOME 2 desktop.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Urban Orb || || The screenname of a Let's Player on Youtube and Twitch. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Angles || City of Angels || Los Angeles. Also, the titular City of Angles in the web novel [http://stefangagne.com/cityofangles/ City of Angles].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Big Wheel || || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bird City USA || || A program started by the Audubon Society. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The City of Seven Crowns || City of Seven Hills || Rome&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Hilltopia ||The Hilltop || May be reference to The Hilltop in AMC's The Walking Dead&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bug City || || A nickname for the bug-infested Chicago in the roleplaying game Shadowrun. Also, a sourcebook for the game.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Bottomless Cup || || There are many mentions of Bottomless Pits in stories. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lorde's Fen || Lord's Fen || [[wikipedia:Lorde| Lorde]] is a musical artist from Herne Bay, New Zealand - an area near Waitemata Harbour. A [[wikipedia:Fen| Fen]] is a type of wetland, which could loosely connect to Herne Bay. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Last Town || || The third book in the Wayward Pines series. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The Empty Set || || The concert hall in the video game Transistor. In mathematics, the {{w|empty set}} refers to an unique set with no elements, often notated as &amp;quot;{}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;∅&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Ghost Harbor || || The name for a brewing company in North Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Demonym in comic&lt;br /&gt;
! Reference&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Northlanders || Highlanders || Maybe a reference to the people of the {{w|Scottish Highlands}}, with a similar demonym. The &amp;quot;High&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;Highlands&amp;quot; is a reference to the mountainous landscape, not the geographical position. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fair Folk || || The elves in ''The Lord of the Rings'' are referred to as the 'fair folk'. The fair folk is also more generally used as a name for fairies in folklore.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Honey Barons || [[wikipedia: Robber_baron_(industrialist) | Robber Barons]] || Possibly a reference to The Robber Barons, a group of powerful industrialists in the late 1800's known for questionable known for questionable business ethics. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Lake Dwellers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Treasurers || || A {{w|treasurer}} is a person in charge of running the treasury of an organization, for example a governmental department.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Swamp Watchers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dream Farmers || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Wellfolk || Werefolk || The were folk were people who could change into animals:  e.g. werewolves.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Rockeaters || [[Wikipedia:List_of_The_Neverending_Story_characters#Pyornkrachzark_and_the_other_messengers| Rockbiter]] || In the Never Ending Story, Pyornkrachzark, more commonly known as &amp;quot;Rock Biter&amp;quot; is a large creature made completely of stone, named due to their diet of rocks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Forgotten Royals || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Remote Clients || [[wikipedia:Remote_computer|Remote computer client]] || In computing, a remote client is a program used to access a computer or service over the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Barrow-Clerks || [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-wights Barrow-wights] || Creatures in &amp;quot;The Lord of the Rings&amp;quot; that resemble wraiths. The Hobbits come across them in the [http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Barrow-downs Barrow-downs].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| The People of Land and Sky || [[wikipedia:Sea_Peoples|Sea Peoples]] ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are standing on a hill overlooking a city. The Gateway Arch is visible, as well as a number of skyscrapers in the skyline.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Ah, New York. The Hot Tamale.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is St. Louis. Also, that's not–&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Winged City. The Gold Trombone. Castleopolis.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: It's none of those.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Kissing Kingdom. Sandland. The High Place. Ol' Ironhook.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Still wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The Thousand Spires. The Graveyard of Kings. Bloomtown. Lantern City USA.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Please stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat, Megan, and Ponytail are walking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: The City of Many Daughters. Big Mauve. The Glass Cradle. The Road Source. London Prime. Hamtown. The Salad Bowl. God's Boudoir. The Glittering Swamp. The Steel Forest. The Mobius Strip. The Land of Trains and Fog. The Meeting Place. The Dark Star. The Walled Garden. Skin City. The Horse Rotary. Turkeytown. The Naked Towers. The Meta-City. The Urban Orb. The City of Angles. The Big Wheel. Bird City USA. The City of Seven Crowns. Hilltopia. Bug City. The Bottomless Cup. [Text size getting smaller] Lorde's Fen. The Last Town. The Empty Set. Ghost Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How long does this last?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: No city has ever let him stay long enough to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141394</id>
		<title>Talk:1850: Air Force Museum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141394"/>
				<updated>2017-06-16T03:09:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: some bases have non-public static displays&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Might the title text be referring to the concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_pleading alternative pleading] or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettle_logic kettle logic]? [[User:Spagovir|Spagovir]] ([[User talk:Spagovir|talk]]) 19:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I hear if you have a basic understanding of computer systems and know a reservist Colonel, you can hack into the flight schedule, reserve two fighters fully loaded down with as much ordnance as they can carry, and go on a rescue mission to save your father who was shot down in disputed airspace. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 18:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What movie is that? (... at least, I ''hope'' it is a movie.) [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 18:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091278/ Iron Eagle]. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 19:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mention of &amp;quot;planes from different eras&amp;quot; alludes to the fact that military aircraft are often still in use after a much longer time than they were originally designed for. Examples of this are the US Air Force's B-52 bomber, first introduced in 1955 (62 years before the publication of this comic) and the C-160 Transall, which has been in service in, e.g., the German Luftwaffe, since 1967 (50 years before). Additionally, aircraft museums typically house military aircraft from previous eras, such as from WWII and the Cold War, to show the evolution in aircraft design and to showcase technological advances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It struck me as more, if not entirely, the latter. I didn't perceive any allusion to the fact that &amp;quot;military aircraft are often still in use after a much longer time than they were originally designed for&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.51|162.158.74.51]] 05:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've removed the C-160 Transall because the German Luftwaffe doesn't belong to any US Air Base. But have you ever seen a B-52 bomber? It's a really historic plane.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 12:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have seen older aircraft on static display at Oceana and Willow Grove Naval Air Stations.  I wouldn't be surprised if the same was also true of some Air Force Bases. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 03:09, 16 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Implication of pursuit?&lt;br /&gt;
The implication is that there was no museum to begin with and Cueball went to observe the actual air force base and '''''is now being pursued by the military'''''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think there's anything to credibly suggest Cueball is being pursued. Hearing helicopters implies they are close enough to perceive a military operation of some sort, but it could easily be launching aircraft departing to another destination as it might be pursuit of Cueball. Is there anything to justify the last 7 words? [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 01:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Realistically, they would be pursued by MPs and probably local police in vehicles, not helicopters. But if Cueball was (intentionally or accidentally) able to get on a base and into a hangar where they were loading ordnance onto jets, they might very well include air units in the search for him. The bigger question is where was Megan while Cueball was inside, seeing as she was close enough to accompany him in the not-so-tactical escape. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 11:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you mean &amp;quot;ordnance,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;ordinance.&amp;quot;  The two words mean completely different things. --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.101|172.68.58.101]] 12:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, thanks. I'm writing these half asleep, appreciate the sanity check. Corrections made.[[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 13:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He's not running and the visit of air base probably happened some time before their meeting. Meaning if they are pursuing him NOW, it shows they are doing it very ineffectively, which on the other hand matches the fact he was able to get inside air base and out without any problems despite, presumably, wandering around without any attempt to hide as you would do in museum. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141311</id>
		<title>Talk:1849: Decades</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141311"/>
				<updated>2017-06-13T16:17:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Comment for next comic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There seems to be a slightly tongue-in-cheek move to call the 2000's &amp;quot;the noughties&amp;quot; with the obvious implication of 'naughty'. Personally though I'm still waiting for everyone to stop saying &amp;quot;2000 and something, it very annoying! [[User:RoyT|RoyT]] ([[User talk:RoyT|talk]]) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Some people I know use the term &amp;quot;double-o's&amp;quot; for the period 2001-2009. Perhaps inspired by 007. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;--[[User:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nialpxe&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]], 2017. [[User_talk:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(Arguments welcome)&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 02:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where would the descriptor &amp;quot;millennial&amp;quot; (adj) fit on this? I suggest that 00's fads be designated &amp;quot;millennial&amp;quot; and 10's fads be... forgotten.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.171|173.245.48.171]] 14:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick note to highlight the double &amp;quot;and&amp;quot; in the text: &amp;quot;(...) is ambiguous and and &amp;quot;aughts&amp;quot; (...)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.6.52|162.158.6.52]] 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good eyes on the double 'and'. Perhaps the explanation needs a sections about other terms not mentioned here &amp;quot;teensies&amp;quot; &amp;quot;noughties&amp;quot; &amp;quot;tenies&amp;quot; etc. (and perhaps the Aughts aren't used due to cultural differences between Brits and Americans, the former more likely to call them the &amp;quot;Noughts&amp;quot;). Also I assume the title text refers to Randal's local variety radio. [[User:WamSam|WamSam]] ([[User talk:WamSam|talk]]) 15:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's no phenomenom of English language. In Germany &amp;quot;80er, 90er und heute&amp;quot; is used quite frequently by several radio stations. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 06:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Around here (UK) I'm used to hearing &amp;quot;80s, 90s, and now&amp;quot;. Seems a bit weird on a 'classic' radio station who didn't play music from the current decade until the 2k rebranding. - [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.109|162.158.154.109]] 08:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I listen to a radio station that says &amp;quot;90s, 2K, and today.&amp;quot; It's not the only time I've seen &amp;quot;2K&amp;quot; used for the first decade of the 2000s {{unsigned ip|162.158.62.75}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2K might end up being the accepted form. It might morph into &amp;quot;the 2-10s,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;the  2-20s,&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;the 2-30s,&amp;quot; and so on. It differentiates the seperate centuries and is short enough to survive the endless grinding of popular culture. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.40|108.162.216.40]] 23:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My local variety station has been says &amp;quot;80s, 90s and today&amp;quot; since the mid-90s, which was really odd for the 5 years or so that it was redundant. {{unsigned ip|172.68.78.28}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around here &amp;quot;the zeroes&amp;quot; is commonly used. {{unsigned ip|141.101.76.46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Next Comic&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
                                                       COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:&lt;br /&gt;
                                                      |&amp;lt; &amp;lt;PREV RANDOM NEXT&amp;gt; &amp;gt;|&lt;br /&gt;
|---------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------|&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal Company            | |   Stingy Company           | | Bored Economist            | |                *crash*     |&lt;br /&gt;
|                           | |                            | |                            | |                            |&lt;br /&gt;
| Is it worth it  Let's     | | Is cost-      Let's do     | | I built a        Did you   | |                            |&lt;br /&gt;
| to spend that  do cost-   | | Benefit       Cost-Benefit | | machine to do    do cost-  | | No, why?    YOU FOOL!      |&lt;br /&gt;
| much on        benefit    | | analysis      analysis to  | | cost-benefit     benefit   | |             YOU'VE         |&lt;br /&gt;
| development?   analysis   | | worth it?     see          | | analysis         analysis? | |             DOOMED US ALL!!|&lt;br /&gt;
|  /                /       | |   /             /          | |    /                /      | |  /               /         |&lt;br /&gt;
|  O               0        | |  O              0          | |   O                0       | |  O               0         |&lt;br /&gt;
| /|\             /|\       | | /|\            /|\         | |  /|\              /|\      | | /|\             /|\        |&lt;br /&gt;
| / \             / \       | | / \            / \         | |  / \              / \      | | / \             / \        |&lt;br /&gt;
|                           | |                            | |                            | |                *rumble*    |&lt;br /&gt;
|---------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{unsigned ip|173.245.50.102}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this mean that there are supposed to be comments on the &amp;quot;next comic&amp;quot;.  One of the problems with the discussion is that there can be predictive cost/benefits analysis (done before the project is carried out) and retrospective cost/benefits analysis (done sometime after the project is complete).  Retrospective cost/benefits analysis can be used to review the accuracy of predictive cost/benefits analysis.  If the accuracy is not verified, the value of the analysis is indeterminate.  Are the costs all costs or simply costs that are assigned to the evaluating organization?  What is the organization for which benefits are to be calculated?  Have the effects of Campbell's Law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell%27s_law and Goodhart's Law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law been taken into account? [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 16:17, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@173.245.50.102 Wait, what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.163|162.158.154.163]] 06:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does Randall usually do when there is typo/grammatical error in a comic? Will he correct it and re-upload it, or just leave it?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.149|172.68.58.149]] 23:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:He'll often notice errors and upload corrected versions, though as of this comment he hasn't yet (nearly 3AM Eastern). Then that fact ends up as trivia here. For example, a few comics ago, the map of America with a word in each state, a paragraph saying how you can make maps like this show whatever you want, he had missed the line separating New Hampshire and Maine, and later the line was there. Same with text errors, a month or two ago was a comic saying &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot;, then later &amp;quot;defeatist&amp;quot;. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 06:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't we run into the same issue in 2020? Since contemporary radio stations are always naming the previous two decades (this formula seems to apply worldwide, it at least does in germany) we wouldn't be able to name them in 2020. &amp;quot;The best hits of the last two decades!&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;You're tuning in to DCKX 102.5! Where we play music - sometimes, duh!&amp;quot;? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.118|162.158.92.118]] 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
my daughter (2009) gleefully uses the term &amp;quot;noughties&amp;quot; since that makes her homophonously &amp;quot;naughty&amp;quot;. she's not so keen on her siblings (2011) being &amp;quot;teens&amp;quot; although that may change when she actually becomes one herself. as with so many things, it's not ultimately up to the old to decide these things. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 11:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1731:_Wrong&amp;diff=141309</id>
		<title>Talk:1731: Wrong</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1731:_Wrong&amp;diff=141309"/>
				<updated>2017-06-13T15:58:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: Discussion of particles as abstractions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wrote up a first explanation of the comic. Someone else also added in a sentence, which nicely merged in to the explanation. Still needs revision and links to articles, as well as an explanation of the title text [[Special:Contributions/172.68.35.81|172.68.35.81]] 04:38, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uh... what do you mean by &amp;quot;just a few sentences to kick this off&amp;quot;??? I don't know how to fix this because I don't understand what you mean. [[User:JayRulesXKCD|JayRulesXKCD]] ([[User talk:JayRulesXKCD|talk]]) 7:52, 9 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Oh, sorry. While I was writing up an explanation, KangaroOS put in the sentence &amp;quot;Some people are just too prideful to admit that they are inherently fallible. White Hat is one of those people.&amp;quot; and put in that tag. When I went to save it, it told me I had to merge our revisions, which worked fine, but I just forgot to merge the tags. [[User:Yosho27|Yosho27]] ([[User talk:Yosho27|talk]]) 13:01, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, if anyone's looking at the article history &amp;quot;172.68.35.81&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Yosho27&amp;quot; are both me (I signed in halfway through) [[User:Yosho27|Yosho27]] ([[User talk:Yosho27|talk]]) 13:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mansplaining much? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.84|141.101.98.84]] 11:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think so. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would dispute that Megan isn't sure what she's talking about. It seems to me that she only sounds uncertain because she is trying to be polite; this is a common strategy for women in particular. (As evidence, note that I started the previous sentence with &amp;quot;it seems to me&amp;quot; instead of an assertion of fact, and the one before that is in the subjunctive mood.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.222|162.158.214.222]] 18:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Worth pointing out that other comics that could be interpreted as mansplaining have had this potential explanation purged. It is my understanding that alternative possible explanations/  of the jokes were encouraged, and many explanations include what seem to be relatively unlikely alternatives. Manplaining is apparently the only one that is verboten. I won't speculate as to why. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.39|162.158.75.39]] 22:59, 24 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any reference to &amp;quot;Somebody's WRONG on the Internet!&amp;quot;?  [[386: Duty Calls]] [[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]] ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) 18:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Went ahead and added it. :) [[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]] ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) 19:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope someone can comment on the theory of the abstraction of particles White Hat gets into in the last panel. Seems like the only part missing so far. I like this comic! ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not really a Quantum physicist, but I read that it's *theoretically* possible (and seen in some particle expierements at the LHC) for a very specific arrangement of quarks to make a (superheavy) &amp;quot;Proton&amp;quot; that  contains Antimatter (Anti-quarks)... A Pentaquark.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentaquark [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.133|108.162.242.133]] 23:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While not really part of objects, there are plenty of {{w|positron}}s (antielectrons) around: they are produced by radioactive decay, can appear in thunderstorms, are used in nuclear medicine. There is enough radioactive isotope of potassium in average human body to produce thousands of positrons per second. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 22:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a technical definition of &amp;quot;object&amp;quot; I am unaware of that excludes hypothetical and abstract objects? What is it that makes a flux capacitor not an object? Or public opinion? Or indeed a sphere made of antimatter? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.52|108.162.219.52]] 15:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)larK&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn't sound like the title text is literally what White Hat is saying, but rather someone else summarizing their statements in a mocking way. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.92|108.162.212.92]] 23:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if his thought (I'm wrong) ended up annihilated as if matter came into contact with antimatter...a bit of irony considering he WAS wrong about the antimatter assertion.  Add if you think it makes sense. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.124|172.68.34.124]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just wanted to comment on the nature of particles being abstractions from quantum field theory.  Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory in the section marked &amp;quot;Implications&amp;quot;.  It contains references to &amp;quot;particle-like&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;field-like&amp;quot; objects.  The mathematics demonstrate artifacts that appear to correspond to the particles.  However, does that mean that particle is a result of the mathematics or the mathematics represent the particle.  If a particle is something that can be observed, how can it be an abstraction?  The particle is a real object whose behavior can be described more or less accurately by the mathematics.  Now, if you had a virtual world inside a computer where Quantum Field Theory is used to determine the location of particles, then particles would be abstract data arising from Quantum Field Theory.  I realize that this sounds confusing, and I am trying to think of how to word this more clearly.  [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 15:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1826:_Birdwatching&amp;diff=139007</id>
		<title>Talk:1826: Birdwatching</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1826:_Birdwatching&amp;diff=139007"/>
				<updated>2017-04-19T18:49:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BradleyRoss: A few comments from a person who has watched birds in the wild.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This is a big one.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.41|108.162.246.41]] 04:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the size is a technical error, or if I am missing some subtle joke. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.184|108.162.245.184]] 04:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess it's the latter. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.71|162.158.166.71]] 04:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the vacuum is a further joke about scale and distance playing on the absurdity of trying to vacuum from a range of one mile. I must say I don't really understand this comic very well.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.70|108.162.245.70]] 04:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought the vacuum was trying to drain the atmosphere to make it so that the birds can't fly as high.[[User:1I1III1|1I1III1]] ([[User talk:1I1III1|talk]]) 05:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That was my thought, too. (/edit: Honestly, to think of sucking the birds in I found being too absurd, while sucking the atmosphere seemed absolutely plausible - at least for an XKCD...) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: If only he had a vacuum the size of the one in Space Balls. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.162|173.245.50.162]] 15:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same birds from 1824? [[User:Codrus|Codrus]] ([[User talk:Codrus|talk]]) 06:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure the size is an error, I've seen this happen briefly before. It's 1200 dpi, suitable for archival, printing, or just what comes off the scanner [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.107|108.162.246.107]] 09:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey folks, am I the only one thinking that Cueball also holds the binoculars the wrong way around? Usually the small end is nearest to the eyes... That would for sure make birdwatching even MORE difficult. Regarding size, I think it is intentional.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.76|162.158.150.76]] 09:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, that's a reflex camera, isn't it? Some camera geek can comment on birdwatching situation camera? That zoom seems much too small for the job, but I've got no real clue...--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The size is intentional. it kinda freaked m out wen i saw it, though. i thought there was a problem with my phone! [[User:Will X|Will X]] ([[User talk:Will X|talk]]) 11:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the size is biting Randall in the rear.  I'm getting all sorts of 503 gateway timeouts that appear to be from his Varnish web accelerator. The East coast is waking up and pounding his server... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.106|162.158.78.106]] 11:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i would take issue with the use of the word &amp;quot;confused&amp;quot; in the transcript. perhaps &amp;quot;blankly&amp;quot; would be more descriptive. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like they fixed the size. Maybe it wasn't intentional?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure, but maybe the size of the comic changes depending on the time?  I mean, it does see like the size is smaller as of right now.(By the way, I'm not the guy on top that didn't sign his/her post.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.138.40|162.158.138.40]] 13:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Megan wearing a knit cap?  Does Randall's wife have cancer again? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.89|162.158.79.89]] 16:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think that's Megan. The transcript names that character as &amp;quot;Beanie-Man.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.238|162.158.78.238]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first thought is than a successful birdwatcher requires patience, which is something that Cueball does not appear to have.  You also want to avoid to making noise, so Cueball talking will probably make the bird stay at a distance, and the ShopVac would be even more discouragement for the hawk.  There are other issues.  I would guess that the camera is a 200 to 300 millimeter lens.  If you wanted to get a good picture of a bird with that type of camera, you would have to get closer to the nest and wait very patiently for the bird to get closer.  (Patiently for several hours or even days.  That doesn't seem like Cueball.)  Many methods are available, but they are a lot of work.  You also don't try to find the bird using the camera.  You try to find the bird without using telescopes or binoculars and then only use the viewing aids once you find the general location of the bird.  Megan is presumably satisfied with the fact that the bird probably only fills a portion of the viewport, while Cueball is expecting a picture of the bird where you can count the feathers.  So Cueball has unreasonable expectations, is unwilling to wait, and is doing just about everything wrong.  He then complains about his lack of success.  Cueball's next attempt might be to use a camera mounted on a drone.  A lot of people have tried though, although the last image captured is often a close up view of the beak filling the entire screen. [[User:BradleyRoss|BradleyRoss]] ([[User talk:BradleyRoss|talk]]) 18:49, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BradleyRoss</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>