<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Brian+Kendig</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Brian+Kendig"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Brian_Kendig"/>
		<updated>2026-04-17T07:13:19Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228843</id>
		<title>Talk:2596: Galaxies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228843"/>
				<updated>2022-03-22T20:50:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I bet this was inspired by the image from the James Webb Space Telescope after fine alignment was complete: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/telescope_alignment_evaluation_image_labeled.png.  That image shows the one star that JWST was focused on, along with a bunch of galaxies in the far background demonstrating that there are a lot of galaxies.  [[User:Orion205|Orion205]] ([[User talk:Orion205|talk]]) 04:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC).&lt;br /&gt;
:My thoughts exactly - definitely a JWST thing.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.218.75|172.70.218.75]] 07:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I do not really think so. Not directly. The image is some weeks old now, and also the knowledge of the number of galaxies comes from the Hubble Deep Field. Which Randall has mentioned before, at least in his Thing explainer. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of JWST, isn't the &amp;quot;''only a few stars, and probably no planets.''&amp;quot; just a nod to the fact that one of the missions of its infrared astronomy is to [[wikipedia:James_Webb_Space_Telescope#Infrared_astronomy|&amp;quot;see back in time to '''the first galaxies forming''' just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang.&amp;quot;]]? i.e.: given the conical shape of the sector of universe covered by the pin-hole, most of the galaxies in it will be the furthest back, thus those of which we see the &amp;quot;oldest&amp;quot; picture and thus which much earlier in their process of forming stars and planets? [[User:DrYak|DrYak]] ([[User talk:DrYak|talk]]) 09:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe but we cannot see them before the stars have formed and begun shining light. And by that time most of the planets would have formed. And also many many stars. So I do not think there is anything in the title text other than to make you think that what he says there is just plain wrong, and thus become even more overwhelmed! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I sort of thought it might be an(other) H2G2 reference, to whit...&lt;br /&gt;
 Population: none.&lt;br /&gt;
 It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in.  However, not every one of them is inhabited.  Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds.  Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero.  From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
::...but worlds-to-galaxies, by the same 'logic', rather than beings-to-worlds. But I'm not sure enough to mention it in the main article, because it disagrees on the basic 'number of planets' issue (indeed, whether the ((observable)) universe is infinite). But putting it out there because it's perfect Adamsonian logic. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173|172.70.90.173]] 14:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While space contains contains a vast number of things, it's still mostly empty. Like, on average, few atoms in whole square meter. Atoms of hydrogen, usually. Imagining so much of practically empty space is even harder than imagining all the stuff in it. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 05:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It took me half a minute to understand it: not galaxies within the circle, but within the region of the sky with the same apparent size from your position as the circle. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.22.175|162.158.22.175]] 10:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:And you can move that circle anywhere you like. Also looking down at Earth surface. Then there will still be 50,000 galaxies within that circle on the other side of the Earth. As long as you hold it at arms length. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another way to consider this is that the moon is a privacy screen for 1.5 million galaxies at any one time. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.122|172.70.131.122]] 16:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The size of the circle could be more accurately estimated by noting that the majority of phones have between a 4.7 to 5.8 inch diagonal (https://deviceatlas.com/blog/viewport-resolution-diagonal-screen-size-and-dpi-most-popular-smartphones). While aspect ratios vary, that seems a decent approximation for the diagonal of the image, and from that, the size of the circle could more accurately estimated from its pixel size relative to the image diagonal. Overkill, though, I know. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.122|172.70.131.122]] 16:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most are undetectable by even our most powerful astronomical instruments today,&amp;quot; - surely the point is that they ''are'' all detectable by the most powerful instruments, otherwise we could not count how many (typically) there are. It's just that we ''need'' more than your 'average' telescope, i.e. Hubble/Webb. The HDF image shows 3,000 items in a solid-angle approximately 1/24millionth of the sky, by the way, which is (at 50cm radius) approximately an eighth of a mm². 50,000 stars would be in ~2mm² of such an image, which is a circle almost 0.8mm in radius - if I haven't slipped up somewhere in the mental arithmatic (someone will tell me that I have, probably!). But that seems to relate well to the scenario suggested. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.145|141.101.98.145]] 20:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Surely the point is that they ''are'' all detectable by the most powerful instruments&amp;quot; - no, not necessarily. I figure that we can guess at the number of galaxies out there without being able to detect them all - by estimating the density of galaxies and considering the size of the universe, for example; and it may be that some galaxies are so far away and that the universe is expanding at such a rate that energy from those galaxies has not yet reached us and might never. - [[User:Brian Kendig|Brian Kendig]] ([[User talk:Brian Kendig|talk]]) 20:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also note that the Hubble Deep Field depicts approximately 50,000 &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;galaxies&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, not just stars. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Deep_Field]. - [[User:Brian Kendig|Brian Kendig]] ([[User talk:Brian Kendig|talk]]) 20:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228842</id>
		<title>Talk:2596: Galaxies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228842"/>
				<updated>2022-03-22T20:47:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I bet this was inspired by the image from the James Webb Space Telescope after fine alignment was complete: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/telescope_alignment_evaluation_image_labeled.png.  That image shows the one star that JWST was focused on, along with a bunch of galaxies in the far background demonstrating that there are a lot of galaxies.  [[User:Orion205|Orion205]] ([[User talk:Orion205|talk]]) 04:52, 22 March 2022 (UTC).&lt;br /&gt;
:My thoughts exactly - definitely a JWST thing.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.218.75|172.70.218.75]] 07:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I do not really think so. Not directly. The image is some weeks old now, and also the knowledge of the number of galaxies comes from the Hubble Deep Field. Which Randall has mentioned before, at least in his Thing explainer. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of JWST, isn't the &amp;quot;''only a few stars, and probably no planets.''&amp;quot; just a nod to the fact that one of the missions of its infrared astronomy is to [[wikipedia:James_Webb_Space_Telescope#Infrared_astronomy|&amp;quot;see back in time to '''the first galaxies forming''' just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang.&amp;quot;]]? i.e.: given the conical shape of the sector of universe covered by the pin-hole, most of the galaxies in it will be the furthest back, thus those of which we see the &amp;quot;oldest&amp;quot; picture and thus which much earlier in their process of forming stars and planets? [[User:DrYak|DrYak]] ([[User talk:DrYak|talk]]) 09:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe but we cannot see them before the stars have formed and begun shining light. And by that time most of the planets would have formed. And also many many stars. So I do not think there is anything in the title text other than to make you think that what he says there is just plain wrong, and thus become even more overwhelmed! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I sort of thought it might be an(other) H2G2 reference, to whit...&lt;br /&gt;
 Population: none.&lt;br /&gt;
 It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in.  However, not every one of them is inhabited.  Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds.  Any finite number divided by infinity is as near to nothing as makes no odds, so the average population of all the planets in the Universe can be said to be zero.  From this it follows that the population of the whole Universe is zero, and that any people you may meet from time to time are merely the products of a deranged imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
::...but worlds-to-galaxies, by the same 'logic', rather than beings-to-worlds. But I'm not sure enough to mention it in the main article, because it disagrees on the basic 'number of planets' issue (indeed, whether the ((observable)) universe is infinite). But putting it out there because it's perfect Adamsonian logic. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173|172.70.90.173]] 14:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While space contains contains a vast number of things, it's still mostly empty. Like, on average, few atoms in whole square meter. Atoms of hydrogen, usually. Imagining so much of practically empty space is even harder than imagining all the stuff in it. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 05:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It took me half a minute to understand it: not galaxies within the circle, but within the region of the sky with the same apparent size from your position as the circle. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.22.175|162.158.22.175]] 10:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:And you can move that circle anywhere you like. Also looking down at Earth surface. Then there will still be 50,000 galaxies within that circle on the other side of the Earth. As long as you hold it at arms length. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:43, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another way to consider this is that the moon is a privacy screen for 1.5 million galaxies at any one time. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.122|172.70.131.122]] 16:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The size of the circle could be more accurately estimated by noting that the majority of phones have between a 4.7 to 5.8 inch diagonal (https://deviceatlas.com/blog/viewport-resolution-diagonal-screen-size-and-dpi-most-popular-smartphones). While aspect ratios vary, that seems a decent approximation for the diagonal of the image, and from that, the size of the circle could more accurately estimated from its pixel size relative to the image diagonal. Overkill, though, I know. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.122|172.70.131.122]] 16:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most are undetectable by even our most powerful astronomical instruments today,&amp;quot; - surely the point is that they ''are'' all detectable by the most powerful instruments, otherwise we could not count how many (typically) there are. It's just that we ''need'' more than your 'average' telescope, i.e. Hubble/Webb. The HDF image shows 3,000 items in a solid-angle approximately 1/24millionth of the sky, by the way, which is (at 50cm radius) approximately an eighth of a mm². 50,000 stars would be in ~2mm² of such an image, which is a circle almost 0.8mm in radius - if I haven't slipped up somewhere in the mental arithmatic (someone will tell me that I have, probably!). But that seems to relate well to the scenario suggested. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.145|141.101.98.145]] 20:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Surely the point is that they ''are'' all detectable by the most powerful instruments&amp;quot; - no, not necessarily. I figure that we can guess at the number of galaxies out there without being able to detect them all - by estimating the density of galaxies and considering the size of the universe, for example; and it may be that some galaxies are so far away and that the universe is expanding at such a rate that energy from those galaxies has not yet reached us and might never. - [[User:Brian Kendig|Brian Kendig]] ([[User talk:Brian Kendig|talk]]) 20:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228839</id>
		<title>2596: Galaxies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228839"/>
				<updated>2022-03-22T19:26:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: clean up some text&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2596&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 21, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Galaxies&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = galaxies.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I know it seems overwhelming, but don't worry; I'm sure most of them have only a few stars, and probably no planets.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote|Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.|{{w|Douglas Adams}}|{{w|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is another comic with a [[:Category:Facts|Fact]], the second in a row of these fact comics to use an Astronomy fact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our best approximation of the number of {{w|galaxies}} in the {{w|observable universe}} is about 200 billion (2 × 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;11&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;). That's a lot of galaxies, and here [[Randall]] exemplifies this by showing a small circle and estimating that when the comic's picture is viewed at a typical arm's length, expanded to full screen on your typical smartphone, the circle contains roughly 50,000 galaxies. Most are undetectable by even our most powerful astronomical instruments today, and comparatively few could be seen (let alone positively identified as such) by the naked eye. For example, in the {{w|Hubble Deep Field}}, an image of a small region in the constellation Ursa Major, about 3,000 visible galaxies can be identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dot size is subjective, but it can reasonably be taken to be 1mm diameter, 0.5mm radius, total area π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; or about π/4 square millimeters. You're probably holding the phone about a half a meter away from your eye. The surface area of a sphere is 4 π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. With a radius of one-half meter, that comes out to be π square meters. Thus, the area of the circle is about 1/4000000 of the area of the sphere, 200 billion galaxies divided by 4 million is the 50,000 average mentioned in the cartoon. A similar mathematics was used for the comic [[1276: Angular Size]], in which the projective sphere was at the Earth's own radius and cross-sectional areas of objects were compared, rather than an approximate count of objects within a given angular spread. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While galaxies usually are between 3,000 to 300,000 {{w|light-years}} across and contain between 10^8 (100 million) and 10^14 (100 trillion) stars, most are so far away from the Earth (upwards of billions of light-years) that they are invisible to the naked eye, or even through most telescopes. When magnified across such vast distances, even something as small as a pinhole expands to huge sizes, easily able to fit tens of thousands of galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The premise of this comic is that although galaxies are giant, space is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;unimaginably&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; big and contains a vast number of things. Randall is apparently overwhelmed by this, as shown in the caption: ''Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is Randall reassuring his readers why not to worry of this overwhelming fact. He states that most galaxies only have few stars and probably no planets. However, as mentioned above each galaxy contains a huge amount of stars, and as evident from all his own comics about [[:Category:Exoplanets|exoplanets]], it is now clear that many of the stars in a galaxy also have planets orbiting them. Thus the number of stars and planets in that small circle is much more mind-bogglingly large, than the number of galaxies, and thus the reassurance is sarcasm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[975: Occulting Telescope]] [[Cueball]] expresses a similar sentiment about the number of stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[An almost white panel with a caption at the top. Then a small circle, much smaller than for instance the letter O in the text is in the center of the panel. A bending arrow points to the circle and beneath the arrow is a caption.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Open this picture fullscreen on your phone and hold it at arm's length.&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 50,000 galaxies in this circle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228838</id>
		<title>2596: Galaxies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228838"/>
				<updated>2022-03-22T19:20:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: clarify the 3,000 / 50,000 confusion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2596&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 21, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Galaxies&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = galaxies.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I know it seems overwhelming, but don't worry; I'm sure most of them have only a few stars, and probably no planets.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote|Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.|{{w|Douglas Adams}}|{{w|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is another comic with a [[:Category:Facts|Fact]], the second in a row of these fact comics to use an Astronomy fact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our best approximation of the number of {{w|galaxies}} in the {{w|observable universe}} is about 200 billion. 2 × 10^11 is a lot of galaxies, and here [[Randall]] exemplifies this by showing a small circle and estimating that when the comic's picture is viewed at a typical arm's length, expanded to full screen on your typical smartphone, the circle contains roughly 50,000 galaxies — albeit most undetectable by even our most powerful astronomical instruments today, and comparatively few could be seen (let alone positively identified as such) by the naked eye. This is most likely taken from the {{w|Hubble Deep Field}}, an image of a small region in the constellation Ursa Major, in which about 3,000 visible galaxies could be identified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dot size is subjective, but it can reasonably be taken to be 1mm diameter, 0.5mm radius, total area π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; or about π/4 square millimeters. You're probably holding the phone about a half a meter away from your eye. The surface area of a sphere is 4 π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. With a radius of one-half meter, that comes out to be π square meters. Thus, the area of the circle is about 1/4000000 of the area of the sphere, 200 billion galaxies divided by 4 million is the 50,000 average mentioned in the cartoon. A similar mathematics was used for the comic [[1276: Angular Size]], in which the projective sphere was at the Earth's own radius and cross-sectional areas of objects were compared, rather than an approximate count of objects within a given angular spread. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While galaxies usually are between 3,000 to 300,000 {{w|light-years}} across and contain between 10^8 (100 million) and 10^14 (100 trillion) stars, most are so far away from the Earth (upwards of billions of light-years) that they are invisible to the naked eye, or even through most telescopes. When magnified across such vast distances, even something as small as a pinhole expands to huge sizes, easily able to fit tens of thousands of galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The premise of this comic is that although galaxies are giant, space is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;unimaginably&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; big and contains a vast number of things. Randall is apparently overwhelmed by this, as shown in the caption: ''Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is Randall reassuring his readers why not to worry of this overwhelming fact. He states that most galaxies only have few stars and probably no planets. However, as mentioned above each galaxy contains a huge amount of stars, and as evident from all his own comics about [[:Category:Exoplanets|exoplanets]], it is now clear that many of the stars in a galaxy also have planets orbiting them. Thus the number of stars and planets in that small circle is much more mind-bogglingly large, than the number of galaxies, and thus the reassurance is sarcasm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[975: Occulting Telescope]] [[Cueball]] expresses a similar sentiment about the number of stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[An almost white panel with a caption at the top. Then a small circle, much smaller than for instance the letter O in the text is in the center of the panel. A bending arrow points to the circle and beneath the arrow is a caption.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Open this picture fullscreen on your phone and hold it at arm's length.&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 50,000 galaxies in this circle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228837</id>
		<title>2596: Galaxies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2596:_Galaxies&amp;diff=228837"/>
				<updated>2022-03-22T19:12:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: improve the explanation of the math involved&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2596&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 21, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Galaxies&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = galaxies.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I know it seems overwhelming, but don't worry; I'm sure most of them have only a few stars, and probably no planets.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a A GALAXY CONTAINING 50,000 SMALL CIRCLES. Do NOT delete this tag too soon. Can someone calculate if this circle would be bigger held at arms length than the Hubble Deep Field. It should be almost 200 times bigger to give 50.000 galaxies if there where 3000 in HDF...}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote|Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.|{{w|Douglas Adams}}|{{w|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is another comic with a [[:Category:Facts|Fact]], the second in a row of these fact comics to use an Astronomy fact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our best approximation of the number of {{w|galaxies}} in the {{w|observable universe}} is about 200 billion. 2 × 10^11 is a lot of galaxies, and here [[Randall]] exemplifies this by showing a small circle and estimating that when the comic's picture is viewed at a typical arm's length, expanded to full screen on your typical smartphone, the circle contains roughly 50,000 detectable galaxies — albeit many beyond the capabilities of all but the most powerful astronomical detectors and comparatively few could be seen (let alone positively identified as such) by the naked eye. This is most likely taken from the {{w|Hubble Deep Field}}, an image of a small region in the constellation Ursa Major, that still contains 3000 galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dot size is subjective, but it can reasonably be taken to be 1mm diameter, 0.5mm radius, total area π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; or about π/4 square millimeters. You're probably holding the phone about a half a meter away from your eye. The surface area of a sphere is 4 π r&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. With a radius of one-half meter, that comes out to be π square meters. Thus, the area of the circle is about 1/4000000 of the area of the sphere, 200 billion galaxies divided by 4 million is the 50,000 average mentioned in the cartoon. A similar mathematics was used for the comic [[1276: Angular Size]], in which the projective sphere was at the Earth's own radius and cross-sectional areas of objects were compared, rather than an approximate count of objects within a given angular spread. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While galaxies usually are between 3,000 to 300,000 {{w|light-years}} across and contain between 10^8 (100 million) and 10^14 (100 trillion) stars, most are so far away from the Earth (upwards of billions of light-years) that they are invisible to the naked eye, or even through most telescopes. When magnified across such vast distances, even something as small as a pinhole expands to huge sizes, easily able to fit tens of thousands of galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The premise of this comic is that although galaxies are giant, space is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;unimaginably&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; big and contains a vast number of things. Randall is apparently overwhelmed by this, as shown in the caption: ''Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is Randall reassuring his readers why not to worry of this overwhelming fact. He states that most galaxies only have few stars and probably no planets. However, as mentioned above each galaxy contains a huge amount of stars, and as evident from all his own comics about [[:Category:Exoplanets|exoplanets]], it is now clear that many of the stars in a galaxy also have planets orbiting them. Thus the number of stars and planets in that small circle is much more mind-bogglingly large, than the number of galaxies, and thus the reassurance is sarcasm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[975: Occulting Telescope]] [[Cueball]] expresses a similar sentiment about the number of stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[An almost white panel with a caption at the top. Then a small circle, much smaller than for instance the letter O in the text is in the center of the panel. A bending arrow points to the circle and beneath the arrow is a caption.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Open this picture fullscreen on your phone and hold it at arm's length.&lt;br /&gt;
:There are 50,000 galaxies in this circle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Astronomy Fact: There are too many galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190567</id>
		<title>2293: RIP John Conway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190567"/>
				<updated>2020-04-13T22:05:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2293&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = RIP John Conway&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rip_john_conway.gif&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 1937-2020&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a GLIDER. Needs more in-depth explanation of how the Game Evolves, possibly with stills from the GIF. Should also expand more on why Conway is a person of note. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|John Horton Conway|John Conway}}, an English mathematician, passed away of {{w|COVID-19}}. Two days later, [[Randall]] created this memorial comic. One of Conway's most famous creations was {{w|Conway's Game of Life}}, which consists of a grid of square cells with rules for how they change over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a given generation, each cell can either be ''alive'' or ''dead'' (empty). To compute the grid for the next generation, these rules are used:&lt;br /&gt;
*Any live cell with two or three live neighbors survives to the next generation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Any dead cell with three live neighbors becomes a live cell in the next generation.&lt;br /&gt;
*All other live cells die in the next generation. Similarly, all other dead cells stay dead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the rules are simple, enormously complex patterns can develop from them, such as &amp;quot;still lifes&amp;quot; (which do not change over generations), &amp;quot;oscillators&amp;quot; (which cycle repeatedly through a set of patterns over a specific period), and &amp;quot;spaceships&amp;quot; (which reproduce their own pattern at an offset from the original).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic begins with the shape of a stick figure as the starting configuration, which then evolves according to the rules of the Game of Life. The pattern breaks into three parts, two of which stay at the same level as the original figure's feet before rapidly melting away, and a third (called a &amp;quot;glider&amp;quot;) that ascends up and to the right. Randall may be suggesting a soul breaking away from the rapidly disintegrating corporeal remains here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A pixelated image of a stick figure. The image is animated, with the pixels changing according to the rules of Conway's Game of Life. The figure splits into two groups, one of which dissipates. The other becomes a 'glider' and moves off to the top-right corner of the image and out of frame. The animation then repeats.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tribute]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with animation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:COVID-19]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190563</id>
		<title>2293: RIP John Conway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190563"/>
				<updated>2020-04-13T21:52:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: fine-tuning the explanation of the grid&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2293&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = RIP John Conway&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rip_john_conway.gif&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 1937-2020&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a GLIDER. Needs more in-depth explanation of how the Game Evolves, possibly with stills from the GIF. Should also expand more on why Conway is a person of note. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|John Horton Conway|John Conway}}, an English mathematician, passed away of {{w|COVID-19}} two days before this comic's release. As such, [[Randall]] created this memorial comic. One of Conway's most famous creations was {{w|Conway's Game of Life}}, which consists of a grid of square cells with rules for how they change over time. Although the rules are simple, the system supports immense complexity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Game of Life proceeds in a series of generations, with ''live'' and ''dead'' cells in each generation obeying these rules:&lt;br /&gt;
*Any live cell (dark colored) with two or three live neighbors survives to the next generation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Any dead cell (white) with three live neighbors becomes a live cell in the next generation.&lt;br /&gt;
*All other live cells die in the next generation. Similarly, all other dead cells stay dead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic begins with the shape of a stick figure as the starting configuration, which then evolves according to the rules of the Game of Life. The pattern breaks into three parts, two of which stay at the same level as the original figure's feet before rapidly melting away, and a third (called a &amp;quot;glider&amp;quot;) that ascends up and to the right. Randall may be suggesting a soul breaking away from the rapidly disintegrating corporeal remains here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A pixelated image of a stick figure. The image is animated, with the pixels changing according to the rules of Conway's Game of Life. The figure splits into two groups, one of which dissipates. The other becomes a 'glider' and moves off to the top-right corner of the image and out of frame. The animation then repeats.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tribute]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with animation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:COVID-19]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1483:_Quotative_Like&amp;diff=84180</id>
		<title>1483: Quotative Like</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1483:_Quotative_Like&amp;diff=84180"/>
				<updated>2015-02-06T14:07:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: more background&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1483&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 6, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Quotative Like&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = quotative_like.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = God was like, &amp;quot;Let there be light,&amp;quot; and there was light.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Megan]] mentions an article on the use of the word &amp;quot;{{w|Like#As a colloquial quotative|like}}&amp;quot; as a {{w|quotative}}. [[Cueball]] makes a joke on this by managing to use the word &amp;quot;like&amp;quot; three times in a seven word sentence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;quotative like&amp;quot; is regularly given as an example of the decline of the English language. It is used to introduce a quotation or impersonation, although what follows may not be a verbatim quote, but rather conveys the general meaning of the original phrase. Although it is modern in terms of the English language, examples of its use can be found all the way back in 1928. The song &amp;quot;[http://www.oldielyrics.com/lyrics/loudon_wainwright_iii/cobwebs.html Cobwebs]&amp;quot; by the American singer-songwriter {{w|Loudon Wainwright III}} blames {{w|Jack Kerouac}} and ''{{w|The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis}}'' character {{w| Maynard G. Krebs}} for starting the vogue of using the word &amp;quot;like&amp;quot; as a quotative. In the early 1980's, the stereotypical {{w|Valley Girl}} made substantial use of the quotative like, which may be the main origin of its contemporary use. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the second panel Megan mentions that in the [http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2015/01/25/linguists-are-like-get-used/ruUQoV0XUTLDjx72JojnBI/story.html article] the {{w|linguist}} [https://faculty.unt.edu/editprofile.php?pid=1485 Patricia Cukor-Avila] is like: &amp;quot;Eventually all the people who hate this kind of thing are going to be dead, and the ones who use it are going to be in control.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it has long been popular to criticize modern developments that are seen as steps backward (see [[1227: The Pace of Modern Life]]), such criticisms are almost always in vain, as they are typically made by the older generation against the younger generation, and the latter is always guaranteed to outlive the former. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quote, however, doesn't actually say ''why'' the older generation will die out, leading Cueball to speculate that Dr. Cukor-Avila is plotting (or warning of) some sort of {{w|genocide}} against people who dislike the use of the quotative like. Megan points out a much more likely interpretation (although this is not mentioned directly the article), that those people will die of old age, but Cueball persists, saying he'll err on the side of caution and make sure to use the quotative like more often, thereby hoping to be spared from the genocide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text applies quotative like to the {{w|Book of Genesis}} (specifically, {{w|Genesis 1:3}}: &amp;quot;God said, 'Let there be light,' and there was light&amp;quot;), the first book of the Hebrew Bible (the Tanakh) and the Christian Old Testament. When researching the history of language {{w|Etymology|etymologists}} take great effort to find the earliest usage of a word or phrase, which may be used to show a historical precedence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan referring to a published article she is holding.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: I found this article on the linguistics of the &amp;quot;Quotative Like&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Like, when you're like, &amp;quot;She was like&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Yea.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: It features a quote from a linguist, Patricia Cukor-Avlia: &amp;quot;Eventually all the people who hate this kind of thing are going to be dead, and the ones who use it are going to be in control.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Wow. Turns out linguists are pretty hardcore.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: I ''think'' she means dead from old age.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I'm gonna start using &amp;quot;like&amp;quot; more, just in case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75384</id>
		<title>1417: Seven</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75384"/>
				<updated>2014-09-07T13:37:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: /* Trivia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1417&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 5, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Seven&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = seven.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The days of the week are Monday, Arctic, Wellsley, Green, Electra, Synergize, and the Seventh Seal.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] (or perhaps [[Randall]]) says he can't distinguish between sets that have exactly seven objects. This leads him to exchange the items in the sets without noticing, to the point where, when attempting to list a single set, each item mentioned actually belongs to a different set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is shown in the comic when Cueball tries to enumerate the seven dwarfs from ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'' (a task some people might find difficult, although they would not just chose words from other sets of seven to fill in the gaps...) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text also makes it clear that even a simple set of seven items, like the days of the week, also goes completely wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is a reference to the oldest {{w|Set-theoretic_definition_of_natural_numbers#Oldest_definition|set-theoretic definition of the natural numbers}} in which for each natural number, an equivalence class is defined over all sets which contain the same number of items.  As Cueball is known for mathematical thinking he could be presumed to have taken the underlying equivalence relation to heart, and (over)applying it to real life, genuinely judges sets to be identical if they both contain N objects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number seven being the number for when sets become indistinguishable is possibly a reference to {{w|The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two|Miller's law}}; however, this refers to elements within the same set becoming indistinguishable, rather than indistinguishability of different sets of the same size, as the original tests involved either distinguishing between the items or repeating them back &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;in the correct order&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comic list===&lt;br /&gt;
For each of the seven lists below, the relevant item's traditional position on its own list of seven is equal to its position on the list in the comic. So, since &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second major taxonomic rank, &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second item on the list in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The seven &amp;quot;dwarfs&amp;quot; mentioned and their relevant sets of seven are (Items in the set are written in bold):&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
! 3&lt;br /&gt;
! 4&lt;br /&gt;
! 5&lt;br /&gt;
! 6&lt;br /&gt;
! 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney's Dwarfs from the movie ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'')&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sneezy''' &lt;br /&gt;
|Dopey&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashful&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleepy&lt;br /&gt;
|Grumpy&lt;br /&gt;
|Happy&lt;br /&gt;
|Doc&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Major {{w|taxonomic ranks}}&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|'''phylum'''&lt;br /&gt;
|class&lt;br /&gt;
|order&lt;br /&gt;
|family&lt;br /&gt;
|genus&lt;br /&gt;
|species&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Continents&lt;br /&gt;
|Asia&lt;br /&gt;
|Africa&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Europe'''&lt;br /&gt;
|North America&lt;br /&gt;
|South America&lt;br /&gt;
|Australia&lt;br /&gt;
|Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven deadly sins|Deadly sins}}&lt;br /&gt;
|lust&lt;br /&gt;
|gluttony&lt;br /&gt;
|greed&lt;br /&gt;
|'''sloth'''&lt;br /&gt;
|wrath&lt;br /&gt;
|envy&lt;br /&gt;
|pride&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven-layer dip|Seven Layer Dip (recipe)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|refried beans&lt;br /&gt;
|cheese&lt;br /&gt;
|ground beef&lt;br /&gt;
|sour cream&lt;br /&gt;
|'''guacamole'''&lt;br /&gt;
|salsa&lt;br /&gt;
|chopped black olives/tomatoes/green onions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|Layers of the {{w|OSI model|Open System Interconnection (OSI) data transmission model}}&lt;br /&gt;
|application&lt;br /&gt;
|presentation&lt;br /&gt;
|session&lt;br /&gt;
|transport&lt;br /&gt;
|network&lt;br /&gt;
|'''data link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|physical&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|{{w|Wonders of the World|Wonders of the Ancient World}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Pyramid of Giza&lt;br /&gt;
|Hanging Gardens of Babylon&lt;br /&gt;
|Statue of Zeus at Olympia&lt;br /&gt;
|Temple of Artemis at Ephesus&lt;br /&gt;
|Mausoleum at Halicarnassus&lt;br /&gt;
|Lighthouse of Alexandria&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Colossus of Rhodes'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Title text list===&lt;br /&gt;
The title text extends this saying he also does the same with the set of the seven days of the week. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sets Cueball's &amp;quot;days of the week&amp;quot; come from are (the relevant items number in the set is written in brackets before the item):&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Days of the week}}: (1) '''Monday''', Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seas#Modern|The Seven Seas (modern version)}} - there are many possible lists of 7 named bodies of water, but one possibility where &amp;amp;ldquo;Arctic&amp;amp;rdquo; comes second in alphabetic order is: Antarctic, (2) '''Arctic''', Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, Mediterranean, and Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Continents}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven Sisters (colleges)|Seven Sisters}}, historically women's colleges in U.S.: Mount Holyoke, Vassar, (3) '''Wellesley''', Smith,  Radcliffe, Bryn Mawr, and Barnard&lt;br /&gt;
# Traditional {{w|spectral color}}s: red, orange, yellow, (4) '''green''', blue, indigo[[#Trivia|*]], and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Pleiades (Greek mythology)|Pleiades}}, Seven Sisters, nymphs and daughters of Atlas and Pleone in Greek mythology (in reverse alphabetical order): Taygete, Sterope, Merope, Maia, (5) '''Electra''', Celaeno, and Alcyone.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''{{w|The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People}}'' by Dr. Stephen R. Covey:  Be proactive, Begin with the end in mind, Put first things first, Think win-win, Seek first to understand and then to be understood, (6) '''Synergize''', and Sharpen the saw&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seals|Seals}} in the Book of Revelation in the New Testament: First seal, Second seal, Third seal, Fourth seal, Fifth seal, Sixth seal, and (7) '''Seventh seal'''[[#Trivia|**]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
: [Megan and Cueball are talking]&lt;br /&gt;
: Megan: Can you name all the dwarfs from Snow White?&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball: Sure, there's, um...&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball's thoughts: Sneezy, phylum, Europe, sloth, guacamole, data link, Colossus of Rhodes&lt;br /&gt;
: Caption: I have this problem where all sets of seven things are indistinguishable to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Arctic (no. 2 on the title text list) could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones|climate zones}}: '''Arctic''', North Temperate, Northern Subtropical, Tropical, Southern Subtropical, South Temperate and Antarctic. &lt;br /&gt;
** There are however usually only five mentioned according to the {{w|Köppen climate classification}}. They are: Tropical, Dry, Temperate, Continental and Polar climate.&lt;br /&gt;
*Concerning the seven colours of the spectrum (no. 4 on the title text list) {{w|Indigo#Classification_as_a_spectral_color|indigo is stuck in}} by {{w|Isaac Newton}} to add up to the seven notes in the {{w|Scale_(music)#Western_music|Western musical scale}} &lt;br /&gt;
** It should be noted that {{w|Indigo#Classification as a spectral color|Newton probably meant}} the colours {{w|cyan}} and {{w|blue}} as we think of it today, rather than blue and {{w|indigo}}. &lt;br /&gt;
** Also note that in a {{w|rainbow}} you usually {{w|Rainbow#Number_of_colours_in_spectrum_or_rainbow|cannot distinguish more than six colours}} with cyan melting in with green and blue and the same for indigo with blue and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{w|Color term#Basic color terms|This is highly dependent on the language you speak.}} Russian, for example, has both sinij and goluboj to describe different blues that in English are both blue. Japanese, as another example, has blue and green together (kinda) in 青.&lt;br /&gt;
** These are also the traditional seven artists' pigments, {{w|Roy_G._Biv|with the accompanying mnemonic &amp;quot;Roy G. Biv&amp;quot;}}.  Indigo dye is a widely known and readily available colouring agent.  The ongoing ubiquity of the ''pigment'' (think denim) gives it a unique prominence in spite of its uncertain status as a spectral colour. &lt;br /&gt;
*Although '''very''' unlikely, ''The Seventh Seal'' (no. 7 on the title text list) could also refer to the 1957 film by Ingmar Bergman.  &lt;br /&gt;
**This was Bergman's seventh film with an English title beginning with the letter ‘S’ (ignoring articles).  ''A Ship Bound for India'', ''Summer Interlude'', ''Secrets of Women'', ''Summer with Monika'', ''Sawdust and Tinsel'', ''Smiles of a Summer Night'', '''''The Seventh Seal'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**Similary ''The Seventh Seal'' is also the seventh Bergman film whose Swedish title starts with ‘S’, although the list has some different members.  ''Skepp till Indialand'', ''Sånt händer inte här'', ''Sommarlek'', ''Sommaren med Monika'', ''Sommarnattens leende'', ''Sista paret ut'', '''''Det sjunde inseglet'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**''The Seventh Seal'' was also one of seven Bergman films submitted by Sweden for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film during the 1950s and 1960s.  '''The Seventh Seal''', ''The Magician'', ''The Virgin Spring'', ''Through a Glass Darkly'', ''The Silence'', ''Persona'', ''Shame''.&lt;br /&gt;
* One way to remember the names of the Seven Dwarfs from the Disney film is: three emotions (Happy, Bashful, Grumpy), two S's (Sleepy, Sneezy), two D's (Dopey, Doc). Cueball assumes that Megan is asking in the context of the Disney film, but other works have named the dwarfs differently; see {{w|Seven Dwarfs}}.&lt;br /&gt;
* Megan's question uses the plural '''dwarfs'''. Astronomers also refer to the plural of {{w|dwarf star}}s as &amp;quot;dwarfs&amp;quot;. The word &amp;quot;dwarves&amp;quot; is used in {{w|J. R. R. Tolkein}}'s works, but has been seen as far back as the early 1800s. [http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000293.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75370</id>
		<title>1417: Seven</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75370"/>
				<updated>2014-09-06T21:54:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: &amp;quot;dwarfs&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;dwarves&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1417&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 5, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Seven&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = seven.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The days of the week are Monday, Arctic, Wellsley, Green, Electra, Synergize, and the Seventh Seal.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] (or perhaps [[Randall]]) says he can't distinguish between sets that have exactly seven objects. This leads him to exchange the items in the sets without noticing, to the point where, when attempting to list a single set, each item mentioned actually belongs to a different set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is shown in the comic when Cueball tries to enumerate the seven dwarfs from ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'' (a task some people might find difficult, although they would not just chose words from other sets of seven to fill in the gaps...) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text also makes it clear that even a simple set of seven items, like the days of the week, also goes completely wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is a reference to the oldest {{w|Set-theoretic_definition_of_natural_numbers#Oldest_definition|set-theoretic definition of the natural numbers}} in which for each natural number, an equivalence class is defined over all sets which contain the same number of items.  As Cueball is known for mathematical thinking he could be presumed to have taken the underlying equivalence relation to heart, and (over)applying it to real life, genuinely judges sets to be identical if they both contain N objects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number seven being the number for when sets become indistinguishable is possibly a reference to {{w|The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two|Miller's law}}; however, this refers to elements within the same set becoming indistinguishable, rather than indistinguishability of different sets of the same size, as the original tests involved either distinguishing between the items or repeating them back &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;in the correct order&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comic list===&lt;br /&gt;
For each of the seven lists below, the relevant item's traditional position on its own list of seven is equal to its position on the list in the comic. So, since &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second major taxonomic rank, &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second item on the list in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The seven &amp;quot;dwarfs&amp;quot; mentioned and their relevant sets of seven are (Items in the set are written in bold):&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
! 3&lt;br /&gt;
! 4&lt;br /&gt;
! 5&lt;br /&gt;
! 6&lt;br /&gt;
! 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney's Dwarfs from the movie ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'')&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sneezy''' &lt;br /&gt;
|Dopey&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashful&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleepy&lt;br /&gt;
|Grumpy&lt;br /&gt;
|Happy&lt;br /&gt;
|Doc&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Major {{w|taxonomic ranks}}&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|'''phylum'''&lt;br /&gt;
|class&lt;br /&gt;
|order&lt;br /&gt;
|family&lt;br /&gt;
|genus&lt;br /&gt;
|species&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Continents&lt;br /&gt;
|Asia&lt;br /&gt;
|Africa&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Europe'''&lt;br /&gt;
|North America&lt;br /&gt;
|South America&lt;br /&gt;
|Australia&lt;br /&gt;
|Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven deadly sins|Deadly sins}}&lt;br /&gt;
|lust&lt;br /&gt;
|gluttony&lt;br /&gt;
|greed&lt;br /&gt;
|'''sloth'''&lt;br /&gt;
|wrath&lt;br /&gt;
|envy&lt;br /&gt;
|pride&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven-layer dip|Seven Layer Dip (recipe)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|refried beans&lt;br /&gt;
|cheese&lt;br /&gt;
|ground beef&lt;br /&gt;
|sour cream&lt;br /&gt;
|'''guacamole'''&lt;br /&gt;
|salsa&lt;br /&gt;
|chopped black olives/tomatoes/green onions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|Layers of the {{w|OSI model|Open System Interconnection (OSI) data transmission model}}&lt;br /&gt;
|application&lt;br /&gt;
|presentation&lt;br /&gt;
|session&lt;br /&gt;
|transport&lt;br /&gt;
|network&lt;br /&gt;
|'''data link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|physical&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|{{w|Wonders of the World|Wonders of the Ancient World}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Pyramid of Giza&lt;br /&gt;
|Hanging Gardens of Babylon&lt;br /&gt;
|Statue of Zeus at Olympia&lt;br /&gt;
|Temple of Artemis at Ephesus&lt;br /&gt;
|Mausoleum at Halicarnassus&lt;br /&gt;
|Lighthouse of Alexandria&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Colossus of Rhodes'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Title text list===&lt;br /&gt;
The title text extends this saying he also does the same with the set of the seven days of the week. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sets Cueball's &amp;quot;days of the week&amp;quot; come from are (the relevant items number in the set is written in brackets before the item):&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Days of the week}}: (1) '''Monday''', Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seas#Modern|The Seven Seas (modern version)}} - there are many possible lists of 7 named bodies of water, but one possibility where &amp;amp;ldquo;Arctic&amp;amp;rdquo; comes second in alphabetic order is: Antarctic, (2) '''Arctic''', Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, Mediterranean, and Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Continents}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven Sisters (colleges)|Seven Sisters}}, historically women's colleges in U.S.: Mount Holyoke, Vassar, (3) '''Wellesley''', Smith,  Radcliffe, Bryn Mawr, and Barnard&lt;br /&gt;
# Traditional {{w|spectral color}}s: red, orange, yellow, (4) '''green''', blue, indigo[[#Trivia|*]], and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Pleiades (Greek mythology)|Pleiades}}, Seven Sisters, nymphs and daughters of Atlas and Pleone in Greek mythology (in reverse alphabetical order): Taygete, Sterope, Merope, Maia, (5) '''Electra''', Celaeno, and Alcyone.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''{{w|The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People}}'' by Dr. Stephen R. Covey:  Be proactive, Begin with the end in mind, Put first things first, Think win-win, Seek first to understand and then to be understood, (6) '''Synergize''', and Sharpen the saw&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seals|Seals}} in the Book of Revelation in the New Testament: First seal, Second seal, Third seal, Fourth seal, Fifth seal, Sixth seal, and (7) '''Seventh seal'''[[#Trivia|**]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
: [Megan and Cueball are talking]&lt;br /&gt;
: Megan: Can you name all the dwarfs from Snow White?&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball: Sure, there's, um...&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball's thoughts: Sneezy, phylum, Europe, sloth, guacamole, data link, Colossus of Rhodes&lt;br /&gt;
: Caption: I have this problem where all sets of seven things are indistinguishable to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Arctic (no. 2 on the title text list) could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones|climate zones}}: '''Arctic''', North Temperate, Northern Subtropical, Tropical, Southern Subtropical, South Temperate and Antarctic. &lt;br /&gt;
** There are however usually only five mentioned according to the {{w|Köppen climate classification}}. They are: Tropical, Dry, Temperate, Continental and Polar climate.&lt;br /&gt;
*Concerning the seven colours of the spectrum (no. 4 on the title text list) {{w|Indigo#Classification_as_a_spectral_color|indigo is stuck in}} by {{w|Isaac Newton}} to add up to the seven notes in the {{w|Scale_(music)#Western_music|Western musical scale}} &lt;br /&gt;
** It should be noted that {{w|Indigo#Classification as a spectral color|Newton probably meant}} the colours {{w|cyan}} and {{w|blue}} as we think of it today, rather than blue and {{w|indigo}}. &lt;br /&gt;
** Also note that in a {{w|rainbow}} you usually {{w|Rainbow#Number_of_colours_in_spectrum_or_rainbow|cannot distinguish more than six colours}} with cyan melting in with green and blue and the same for indigo with blue and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{w|Color term#Basic color terms|This is highly dependent on the language you speak.}} Russian, for example, has both sinij and goluboj to describe different blues that in English are both blue. Japanese, as another example, has blue and green together (kinda) in 青.&lt;br /&gt;
** These are also the traditional seven artists' pigments, {{w|Roy_G._Biv|with the accompanying mnemonic &amp;quot;Roy G. Biv&amp;quot;}}.  Indigo dye is a widely known and readily available colouring agent.  The ongoing ubiquity of the ''pigment'' (think denim) gives it a unique prominence in spite of its uncertain status as a spectral colour. &lt;br /&gt;
*Although '''very''' unlikely, ''The Seventh Seal'' (no. 7 on the title text list) could also refer to the 1957 film by Ingmar Bergman.  &lt;br /&gt;
**This was Bergman's seventh film with an English title beginning with the letter ‘S’ (ignoring articles).  ''A Ship Bound for India'', ''Summer Interlude'', ''Secrets of Women'', ''Summer with Monika'', ''Sawdust and Tinsel'', ''Smiles of a Summer Night'', '''''The Seventh Seal'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**Similary ''The Seventh Seal'' is also the seventh Bergman film whose Swedish title starts with ‘S’, although the list has some different members.  ''Skepp till Indialand'', ''Sånt händer inte här'', ''Sommarlek'', ''Sommaren med Monika'', ''Sommarnattens leende'', ''Sista paret ut'', '''''Det sjunde inseglet'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**''The Seventh Seal'' was also one of seven Bergman films submitted by Sweden for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film during the 1950s and 1960s.  '''The Seventh Seal''', ''The Magician'', ''The Virgin Spring'', ''Through a Glass Darkly'', ''The Silence'', ''Persona'', ''Shame''.&lt;br /&gt;
* One way to remember the names of the Seven Dwarfs is: three emotions (Happy, Bashful, Grumpy), two S's (Sleepy, Sneezy), two D's (Dopey, Doc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75369</id>
		<title>1417: Seven</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1417:_Seven&amp;diff=75369"/>
				<updated>2014-09-06T21:53:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Kendig: /* Trivia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1417&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 5, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Seven&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = seven.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The days of the week are Monday, Arctic, Wellsley, Green, Electra, Synergize, and the Seventh Seal.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] (or perhaps [[Randall]]) says he can't distinguish between sets that have exactly seven objects. This leads him to exchange the items in the sets without noticing, to the point where, when attempting to list a single set, each item mentioned actually belongs to a different set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is shown in the comic when Cueball tries to enumerate the seven dwarfs from ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'' (a task some people might find difficult, although they would not just chose words from other sets of seven to fill in the gaps...) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text also makes it clear that even a simple set of seven items, like the days of the week, also goes completely wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is a reference to the oldest {{w|Set-theoretic_definition_of_natural_numbers#Oldest_definition|set-theoretic definition of the natural numbers}} in which for each natural number, an equivalence class is defined over all sets which contain the same number of items.  As Cueball is known for mathematical thinking he could be presumed to have taken the underlying equivalence relation to heart, and (over)applying it to real life, genuinely judges sets to be identical if they both contain N objects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number seven being the number for when sets become indistinguishable is possibly a reference to {{w|The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two|Miller's law}}; however, this refers to elements within the same set becoming indistinguishable, rather than indistinguishability of different sets of the same size, as the original tests involved either distinguishing between the items or repeating them back &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;in the correct order&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Comic list===&lt;br /&gt;
For each of the seven lists below, the relevant item's traditional position on its own list of seven is equal to its position on the list in the comic. So, since &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second major taxonomic rank, &amp;quot;phylum&amp;quot; is the second item on the list in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The seven &amp;quot;dwarfs&amp;quot; mentioned and their relevant sets of seven are (Items in the set are written in bold):&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
! 3&lt;br /&gt;
! 4&lt;br /&gt;
! 5&lt;br /&gt;
! 6&lt;br /&gt;
! 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney's Dwarfs from the movie ''{{w|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs}}'')&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sneezy''' &lt;br /&gt;
|Dopey&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashful&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleepy&lt;br /&gt;
|Grumpy&lt;br /&gt;
|Happy&lt;br /&gt;
|Doc&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Major {{w|taxonomic ranks}}&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|'''phylum'''&lt;br /&gt;
|class&lt;br /&gt;
|order&lt;br /&gt;
|family&lt;br /&gt;
|genus&lt;br /&gt;
|species&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Continents&lt;br /&gt;
|Asia&lt;br /&gt;
|Africa&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Europe'''&lt;br /&gt;
|North America&lt;br /&gt;
|South America&lt;br /&gt;
|Australia&lt;br /&gt;
|Antarctica&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven deadly sins|Deadly sins}}&lt;br /&gt;
|lust&lt;br /&gt;
|gluttony&lt;br /&gt;
|greed&lt;br /&gt;
|'''sloth'''&lt;br /&gt;
|wrath&lt;br /&gt;
|envy&lt;br /&gt;
|pride&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!{{w|Seven-layer dip|Seven Layer Dip (recipe)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|refried beans&lt;br /&gt;
|cheese&lt;br /&gt;
|ground beef&lt;br /&gt;
|sour cream&lt;br /&gt;
|'''guacamole'''&lt;br /&gt;
|salsa&lt;br /&gt;
|chopped black olives/tomatoes/green onions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|Layers of the {{w|OSI model|Open System Interconnection (OSI) data transmission model}}&lt;br /&gt;
|application&lt;br /&gt;
|presentation&lt;br /&gt;
|session&lt;br /&gt;
|transport&lt;br /&gt;
|network&lt;br /&gt;
|'''data link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|physical&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!|{{w|Wonders of the World|Wonders of the Ancient World}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Pyramid of Giza&lt;br /&gt;
|Hanging Gardens of Babylon&lt;br /&gt;
|Statue of Zeus at Olympia&lt;br /&gt;
|Temple of Artemis at Ephesus&lt;br /&gt;
|Mausoleum at Halicarnassus&lt;br /&gt;
|Lighthouse of Alexandria&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Colossus of Rhodes'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Title text list===&lt;br /&gt;
The title text extends this saying he also does the same with the set of the seven days of the week. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sets Cueball's &amp;quot;days of the week&amp;quot; come from are (the relevant items number in the set is written in brackets before the item):&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Days of the week}}: (1) '''Monday''', Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seas#Modern|The Seven Seas (modern version)}} - there are many possible lists of 7 named bodies of water, but one possibility where &amp;amp;ldquo;Arctic&amp;amp;rdquo; comes second in alphabetic order is: Antarctic, (2) '''Arctic''', Atlantic, Caribbean, Indian, Mediterranean, and Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
## This could also be a reference to {{w|Continents}}. See [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven Sisters (colleges)|Seven Sisters}}, historically women's colleges in U.S.: Mount Holyoke, Vassar, (3) '''Wellesley''', Smith,  Radcliffe, Bryn Mawr, and Barnard&lt;br /&gt;
# Traditional {{w|spectral color}}s: red, orange, yellow, (4) '''green''', blue, indigo[[#Trivia|*]], and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Pleiades (Greek mythology)|Pleiades}}, Seven Sisters, nymphs and daughters of Atlas and Pleone in Greek mythology (in reverse alphabetical order): Taygete, Sterope, Merope, Maia, (5) '''Electra''', Celaeno, and Alcyone.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''{{w|The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People}}'' by Dr. Stephen R. Covey:  Be proactive, Begin with the end in mind, Put first things first, Think win-win, Seek first to understand and then to be understood, (6) '''Synergize''', and Sharpen the saw&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|Seven_Seals|Seals}} in the Book of Revelation in the New Testament: First seal, Second seal, Third seal, Fourth seal, Fifth seal, Sixth seal, and (7) '''Seventh seal'''[[#Trivia|**]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
: [Megan and Cueball are talking]&lt;br /&gt;
: Megan: Can you name all the dwarves from Snow White?&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball: Sure, there's, um...&lt;br /&gt;
: Cueball's thoughts: Sneezy, phylum, Europe, sloth, guacamole, data link, Colossus of Rhodes&lt;br /&gt;
: Caption: I have this problem where all sets of seven things are indistinguishable to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Arctic (no. 2 on the title text list) could also be a reference to {{w|Climate zones|climate zones}}: '''Arctic''', North Temperate, Northern Subtropical, Tropical, Southern Subtropical, South Temperate and Antarctic. &lt;br /&gt;
** There are however usually only five mentioned according to the {{w|Köppen climate classification}}. They are: Tropical, Dry, Temperate, Continental and Polar climate.&lt;br /&gt;
*Concerning the seven colours of the spectrum (no. 4 on the title text list) {{w|Indigo#Classification_as_a_spectral_color|indigo is stuck in}} by {{w|Isaac Newton}} to add up to the seven notes in the {{w|Scale_(music)#Western_music|Western musical scale}} &lt;br /&gt;
** It should be noted that {{w|Indigo#Classification as a spectral color|Newton probably meant}} the colours {{w|cyan}} and {{w|blue}} as we think of it today, rather than blue and {{w|indigo}}. &lt;br /&gt;
** Also note that in a {{w|rainbow}} you usually {{w|Rainbow#Number_of_colours_in_spectrum_or_rainbow|cannot distinguish more than six colours}} with cyan melting in with green and blue and the same for indigo with blue and violet.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{w|Color term#Basic color terms|This is highly dependent on the language you speak.}} Russian, for example, has both sinij and goluboj to describe different blues that in English are both blue. Japanese, as another example, has blue and green together (kinda) in 青.&lt;br /&gt;
** These are also the traditional seven artists' pigments, {{w|Roy_G._Biv|with the accompanying mnemonic &amp;quot;Roy G. Biv&amp;quot;}}.  Indigo dye is a widely known and readily available colouring agent.  The ongoing ubiquity of the ''pigment'' (think denim) gives it a unique prominence in spite of its uncertain status as a spectral colour. &lt;br /&gt;
*Although '''very''' unlikely, ''The Seventh Seal'' (no. 7 on the title text list) could also refer to the 1957 film by Ingmar Bergman.  &lt;br /&gt;
**This was Bergman's seventh film with an English title beginning with the letter ‘S’ (ignoring articles).  ''A Ship Bound for India'', ''Summer Interlude'', ''Secrets of Women'', ''Summer with Monika'', ''Sawdust and Tinsel'', ''Smiles of a Summer Night'', '''''The Seventh Seal'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**Similary ''The Seventh Seal'' is also the seventh Bergman film whose Swedish title starts with ‘S’, although the list has some different members.  ''Skepp till Indialand'', ''Sånt händer inte här'', ''Sommarlek'', ''Sommaren med Monika'', ''Sommarnattens leende'', ''Sista paret ut'', '''''Det sjunde inseglet'''''.  &lt;br /&gt;
**''The Seventh Seal'' was also one of seven Bergman films submitted by Sweden for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film during the 1950s and 1960s.  '''The Seventh Seal''', ''The Magician'', ''The Virgin Spring'', ''Through a Glass Darkly'', ''The Silence'', ''Persona'', ''Shame''.&lt;br /&gt;
* One way to remember the names of the Seven Dwarfs is: three emotions (Happy, Bashful, Grumpy), two S's (Sleepy, Sneezy), two D's (Dopey, Doc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Brian Kendig</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>