<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cgrimes85</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cgrimes85"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Cgrimes85"/>
		<updated>2026-04-28T07:45:03Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2192:_Review&amp;diff=178377</id>
		<title>Talk:2192: Review</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2192:_Review&amp;diff=178377"/>
				<updated>2019-08-21T14:03:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Earth : Terrible storyline, feel depressed afterward. Controls buggy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mostly harmless - [[User:GreenWyvern|GreenWyvern]] ([[User talk:GreenWyvern|talk]]) 13:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New servers opening soon! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.124|172.68.51.124]] 13:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He could discuss in greater detail at https://www.reddit.com/r/outside/ [[User:Poodlehat|Poodlehat]] ([[User talk:Poodlehat|talk]]) 13:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the title text is alluding to controlling things like climate warming and the like, not learning to walk. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 13:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Huge World&amp;quot; would imply that the game type is first or third person, with the player taking control of a character in that world. In this sense, I think it's appropriate for the controls to be in reference to movement of the character. If the game type were management or simulation, I think you would be correct. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 14:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2179:_NWS_Warnings&amp;diff=177018</id>
		<title>2179: NWS Warnings</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2179:_NWS_Warnings&amp;diff=177018"/>
				<updated>2019-07-23T13:40:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2179&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 23, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = NWS Warnings&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = nws_warnings.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Kind of rude of them to simultaneously issue an EVACUATION - IMMEDIATE alert, a SHELTER IN PLACE alert, and a 911 TELEPHONE OUTAGE alert.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a NWS EMPLOYEE THAT REALLY NEEDED A BREAK. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The {{w|National Weather Service}} (NWS) is a United States federal agency that is tasked with issuing national weather forecasts and {{w|Severe weather terminology (United States)|extreme weather alert}}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic portrays the NWS as a person that needs breaks, which is absurd, as it is an important service and would probably always have staff active, even on holidays. For example, the NWS [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/10/04/weather-service-office-begs-please-pay-us-in-secret-message/ continued to work during federal government shutdowns], as it was considered an essential service for the protection of life and property. Even if one of the NWS's 122 local weather offices were to be incapacitated, contingency plans are in place to ensure that nearby offices act as emergency cover; as happened in March 2019 with [https://twitter.com/mikeseidel/status/1106705454435057666 flooding in Nebraska forcing the NWS office in Valley to evacuate.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, in this comic the NWS has decided to take a break, and so has opted to issue every extreme weather alert possible for the entire country to make sure no one is caught by surprise by extreme weather, since the NWS will not be able to issue warnings. As the NWS could not be sure which areas will need to get warned of severe incidents, the NWS has decided to issue warning polygons that cover the entire United States. A layer of humor is that this would necessitate warnings where they would be highly unlikely to occur in real life; examples include issuing Blizzard Warnings for Florida, where any amount of snow is rare, and Tsunami Warnings for areas very far from any ocean coastline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions how some of the warnings that have been issued require action to get to safety that contradicts the other warnings, for example, an evacuation warning and a shelter in place order, since doing one would mean failing to do the other. This confusing scenario would likely prompt many concerned citizens to call emergency services for clarification, but the 911 outage alert would advise against this, adding another layer to the absurdity of the occurrence of the NWS taking a break.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic was likely inspired by the heat wave that impacted two-thirds of the US for more than a week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Title in frame]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alert: Everyone Just Keep An Eye Out In General&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[A map of the 48 contiguous states of the United States, surrounded by several warning polygons that cover most or all of the area, along with parts of neighboring countries or the sea.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[The following warning headers are printed in different colors around the map of the United States, some of which are cut off by the frame. Assumptions about text outside of the frame are given in parentheses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gale Warning, Tornado Warning, Flash Flood Warning, Air Quality (Alert) &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Frost Advisory, Severe Thunderstorm Warning, Dense Fog Advisory &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Hurricane Force W)ind Watch, Tropical Storm Warning, Ice Stor(m Warning) &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Extreme Cold) Warning, Heat A(dvisory) &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Flood) Advisory, Snow (Squall Warning)   &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Storm Surge) Warning, Brisk W(ind Advisory)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Lake Effect Snow) Watch, Coastal Fl(ood Advisory)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dense Smo(ke Advisory)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Severe Weather Sta)tement, Gale War(ning)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Lakeshore Flood) Advisory, Wind Chill Ad(visory)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Extreme) Cold Warning, Blizzard Warn(ing)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hurricane Warning, Extreme Fire (Danger)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Freezing Fog Adv)isory, Tsunami Warning, Avalanche W(arning)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Ice S)torm Warning, Frost Advisory, Fire Warning, Volcano Warn(ing)  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ashfall Advisory, Red Flag Warning, Radiological Hazard Warning  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Text below frame]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the National Weather Service needs to take a day off, they just issue warnings for everything so no one is caught by surprise.&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2177:_Gastroenterology&amp;diff=176790</id>
		<title>Talk:2177: Gastroenterology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2177:_Gastroenterology&amp;diff=176790"/>
				<updated>2019-07-17T16:55:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope they are not eating italian, you never know what might happen if pasta and antipasta meet. [[User:Arachrah|Arachrah]] ([[User talk:Arachrah|talk]]) 16:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yea I figure this is a matter / anti-matter joke. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176605</id>
		<title>Talk:2175: Flag Interpretation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176605"/>
				<updated>2019-07-12T15:56:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Something about a Dali-esque melting flagpole set at half-mast seems very suggestive to me...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flying the US flag upside down would be considered a distress signal by many. Should this be in the main description or a &amp;quot;trivia&amp;quot; section? [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 15:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Half mast or half staff? In the US (which appears to be the flag shown in the comic), the popular usage is half-staff, although half-mast is more common elsewhere. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 15:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176603</id>
		<title>2175: Flag Interpretation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176603"/>
				<updated>2019-07-12T15:53:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2175&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Flag Interpretation&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = flag_interpretation.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When Salvador Dalí died, it took months to get all the flagpoles sufficiently melted.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an IMPORTANT CLONE. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In many countries including the United States (whose flag is depicted in the comic), it is customary to lower the flag to half staff when important public figures die. In the US, regulations regarding flying the flag at half staff only specify the length of time for the flag to be flown at half staff, and are based on the importance of the person who has died. There are no regulations where the flag would be flown at any height other than full height or half staff, and there are no regulations where multiple flags would be flown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall, as usual, makes a humorous list of fictional additional traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, flying the US flag upside down is widely considered a distress signal, and would not be intended to indicate an important figure has died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176602</id>
		<title>Talk:2175: Flag Interpretation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176602"/>
				<updated>2019-07-12T15:51:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Something about a Dali-esque melting flagpole set at half-mast seems very suggestive to me...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flying the US flag upside down would be considered a distress signal by many. Should this be in the main description or a &amp;quot;trivia&amp;quot; section? [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 15:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176601</id>
		<title>2175: Flag Interpretation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176601"/>
				<updated>2019-07-12T15:50:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2175&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Flag Interpretation&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = flag_interpretation.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When Salvador Dalí died, it took months to get all the flagpoles sufficiently melted.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an IMPORTANT CLONE. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In many countries including the United States (whose flag is depicted in the comic), it is customary to lower the flag to half staff when important public figures die. In the US, regulations regarding flying the flag at half staff only specify the length of time for the flag to be flown at half staff, and are based on the importance of the person who has died. There are no regulations where the flag would be flown at any height other than full height or half staff, and there are not regulations where multiple flags would be flown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall, as usual, makes a humorous list of fictional additional traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, flying the US flag upside down is widely considered a distress signal, and would not be intended to indicate an important figure has died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176600</id>
		<title>2175: Flag Interpretation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2175:_Flag_Interpretation&amp;diff=176600"/>
				<updated>2019-07-12T15:50:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2175&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Flag Interpretation&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = flag_interpretation.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When Salvador Dalí died, it took months to get all the flagpoles sufficiently melted.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an IMPORTANT CLONE. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In many countries including the United States, it is customary to lower the flag to half staff when important public figures die. In the US, regulations regarding flying the flag at half staff only specify the length of time for the flag to be flown at half staff, and are based on the importance of the person who has died. There are no regulations where the flag would be flown at any height other than full height or half staff, and there are not regulations where multiple flags would be flown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall, as usual, makes a humorous list of fictional additional traditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, flying the US flag upside down is widely considered a distress signal, and would not be intended to indicate an important figure has died.&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174420</id>
		<title>Talk:2153: Effects of High Altitude</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174420"/>
				<updated>2019-05-22T18:53:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don’t even know where to begin. [[User:Netherin5|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone verify if the baseballs and golf balls actually fly further? I'd assume it's due to lower air density and therefore resistance, not weaker gravity as someone else had written. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Both parts (air resitance and gravity) play a role here. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.106|172.68.51.106]] 18:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At 1 mile altitude the acceleration due to gravity is only about 0.05% less than at sea level, so I don't think it's important relative to the lower air resistance. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say the last frame is a reference to 5 o'clock time for drinks. On urban dictionary there's a reference to 4:20 being the time to 'smoke the reefer' [[User:Palmpje|Palmpje]] ([[User talk:Palmpje|talk]]) 18:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's definitely about weed, not liquor. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture) Wikipedia article on 420]. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 18:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174399</id>
		<title>Talk:2153: Effects of High Altitude</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174399"/>
				<updated>2019-05-22T18:13:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don’t even know where to begin. [[User:Netherin5|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone verify if the baseballs and golf balls actually fly further? I'd assume it's due to lower air density and therefore resistance, not weaker gravity as someone else had written. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174396</id>
		<title>2153: Effects of High Altitude</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174396"/>
				<updated>2019-05-22T18:11:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2153&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 22, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Effects of High Altitude&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = effects_of_high_altitude.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If she'd lived in Flagstaff (elevation 6,903 feet), Cruella de Vil would only have needed 89 dalmatians for her coat.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a HIGH BOT. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic starts out with a couple facts about high altitude:&lt;br /&gt;
* Water boils at 202 degrees F (94 degrees C), slightly lower than the baseline 212 degrees F (100 degrees C) it takes at sea level, due to the lower air pressure&lt;br /&gt;
* Baseballs and golf balls fly slightly farther due to the lower air density&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunburn develops faster due to the decreased atmosphere filtering out harmful rays &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It quickly degenerates into the comical and absurd applying this &amp;quot;slightly less&amp;quot; rule to everything&lt;br /&gt;
* It takes &amp;quot;94 Luftballons&amp;quot; (English title has Red balloons) according to the German band Nena's hit song to start global nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
* Marijuana jokes are made earlier. 4:20 is associated with Cannabis culture as a time that everyone smokes in the afternoon. This joke is probably related to the legalization of recreational marijuana use in Colorado.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174395</id>
		<title>2153: Effects of High Altitude</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174395"/>
				<updated>2019-05-22T18:10:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2153&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 22, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Effects of High Altitude&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = effects_of_high_altitude.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If she'd lived in Flagstaff (elevation 6,903 feet), Cruella de Vil would only have needed 89 dalmatians for her coat.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a HIGH BOT. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic starts out with a couple facts about high altitude:&lt;br /&gt;
* Water boils at 202 degrees F (94 degrees C), slightly lower than the baseline 212 degrees F (100 degrees C) it takes at sea level, due to the lower air pressure&lt;br /&gt;
* Baseballs and golf balls fly slightly farther due to the lower air density&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunburn develops faster due to the decreased atmosphere filtering out harmful rays &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It quickly degenerates into the comical and absurd applying this &amp;quot;slightly less&amp;quot; rule to everything&lt;br /&gt;
* It takes &amp;quot;94 Luftballons&amp;quot; (English title has Red balloons) according to the German band Nena's hit song to start global nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174394</id>
		<title>2153: Effects of High Altitude</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2153:_Effects_of_High_Altitude&amp;diff=174394"/>
				<updated>2019-05-22T18:10:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2153&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 22, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Effects of High Altitude&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = effects_of_high_altitude.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If she'd lived in Flagstaff (elevation 6,903 feet), Cruella de Vil would only have needed 89 dalmatians for her coat.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a HIGH BOT. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic starts out with a couple facts about high altitude:&lt;br /&gt;
* Water boils at 202 degrees F (94 degrees C), slightly lower than the baseline 212 degrees F (100 degrees C) it takes at sea level, due to the lower air pressure&lt;br /&gt;
* Baseballs and golf balls fly slightly farther due to the lower air density&lt;br /&gt;
* Sunburn develops faster due to the decreased atmosphere filtering out harmful rays &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It quickly degenerates into the comical and absurd applying this &amp;quot;slightly less&amp;quot; rule to everything&lt;br /&gt;
* It takes &amp;quot;89 Luftballons&amp;quot; (English title has Red balloons) according to the German band Nena's hit song to start global nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173102</id>
		<title>Talk:2141: UI vs UX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173102"/>
				<updated>2019-04-24T19:13:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic as a whole is making fun of how meta software developers get about the user experience, seeking to name all the different types of interactions a user can have with an app or webpage. &lt;br /&gt;
This comic is massive for me on my desktop (chrome); I wonder if this is a joke about bad UX or if it is a genuine error? [[User:Fwacer|Fwacer]] ([[User talk:Fwacer|talk]]) 18:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not this big on xkcd.com. Did it start this big and got fixed on the original site? Update: replaced with the image from xkcd.com which was much smaller. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me, it comes across as a hyperbolic play on the common confusion between the meaning of UI and UX. [https://twitter.com/sdw/status/709853249407361024] [[User:Ahiijny|Ahiijny]] ([[User talk:Ahiijny|talk]]) 19:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It makes sense that it would be alpha and omega, but I originally thought it was the &amp;quot;proportional&amp;quot; symbol. I only ask because alpha is lowercase and omega is uppercase, although perhaps this was to avoid confusion with the Latin &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 19:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173098</id>
		<title>Talk:2141: UI vs UX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173098"/>
				<updated>2019-04-24T18:56:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic as a whole is making fun of how meta software developers get about the user experience, seeking to name all the different types of interactions a user can have with an app or webpage. &lt;br /&gt;
This comic is massive for me on my desktop (chrome); I wonder if this is a joke about bad UX or if it is a genuine error? [[User:Fwacer|Fwacer]] ([[User talk:Fwacer|talk]]) 18:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not this big on xkcd.com. Did it start this big and got fixed on the original site? Update: replaced with the image from xkcd.com which was much smaller. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:ui_vs_ux.png&amp;diff=173097</id>
		<title>File:ui vs ux.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:ui_vs_ux.png&amp;diff=173097"/>
				<updated>2019-04-24T18:56:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: Cgrimes85 uploaded a new version of File:ui vs ux.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173095</id>
		<title>Talk:2141: UI vs UX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173095"/>
				<updated>2019-04-24T18:55:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic as a whole is making fun of how meta software developers get about the user experience, seeking to name all the different types of interactions a user can have with an app or webpage. &lt;br /&gt;
This comic is massive for me on my desktop (chrome); I wonder if this is a joke about bad UX or if it is a genuine error? [[User:Fwacer|Fwacer]] ([[User talk:Fwacer|talk]]) 18:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not this big on xkcd.com. Did it start this big and got fixed on the original site? [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173094</id>
		<title>2141: UI vs UX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173094"/>
				<updated>2019-04-24T18:53:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2141&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 24, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = UI vs UX&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = ui_vs_ux.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = U[unprintable glyph]: The elements a higher power uses to bend that moral arc. U[even more unprintable glyph]: The higher power's overall experience bending that moral arc.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a UX DESIGNER. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171535</id>
		<title>Talk:2127: Panama Canal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171535"/>
				<updated>2019-03-23T00:17:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Can any English majors verify if 'we would had to modify it' in the Title text is grammatically ok or not? It sounds like it should be 'we would have had to modify it' or 'we would've had to...', but I could be wrong or maybe it was intentional? [[User:Stickfigurefan|Stickfigurefan]] ([[User talk:Stickfigurefan|talk]]) 18:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure it is just a missing word and yes I think &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; is the missing word  so ''we would have had to modify it'' was the intention. Maybe it will be corrected, the comic has only been up 20 minutes now. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But as written, you can split the title text exactly in half (at the the space after &amp;quot;would&amp;quot;, and including the final period). &amp;quot;Have&amp;quot; doesn't work--the two halves aren't even--&amp;quot;halve&amp;quot; works...but then you have to split it as &amp;quot;ha|lve&amp;quot;. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, there also appears to be another missing word: &amp;quot;...would ['ve/of/have] had to modify it [to] include...&amp;quot;. I was hoping there was a joke in the shorter cut--representing the standard Panama palindrome--crossing the longer title text (represented in the vertical canal, leaving an improperly-cut &amp;quot;have&amp;quot;, either as 've or &amp;quot;of&amp;quot;) but two missing words doesn't seem to fit that hope. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fun fact:  The portion of the Arctic–Antarctic Canal that passes through central Panamá actually runs from south to north (or at least southwest to northeast), rather than from north to south!  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 19:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The actual Panama Canal runs West to East from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Both are due to the fact that Panama is a bit of an S shape. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 00:17, 23 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proposal for the Suez Canal was for it to run from the Cape of Good Hope to Cape Dezhnev via Nepal and Tibet... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.152|162.158.155.152]] 21:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Would you opt for tunnel through Himalayas? Note that Himalayas are still rising by more than 1 cm per year, so you would need to compensate in your maintenance plans. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's interesting to me how palindromic the Panama cut is...compared to the other one. [[User:Elvenivle|Elvenivle]] ([[User talk:Elvenivle|talk]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171520</id>
		<title>2127: Panama Canal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2127:_Panama_Canal&amp;diff=171520"/>
				<updated>2019-03-22T19:44:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */ I don't think construction of the Panama Canal was &amp;quot;very easy&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2127&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 22, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Panama Canal&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = panama_canal.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Once they selected the other proposal, we could have kept shopping ours around, but we would had to modify it include an aqueduct over their canal, which would be totally unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a Panamax vessel. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Panama Canal is, as the name suggests, a canal through the country of Panama. It is important for bridging the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and is an important trade route. The canal is in Panama because this is the narrowest land crossing between the two oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball proposes an alternate route for the Panama Canal that connects the Arctic Ocean to the Great Southern Ocean instead of connecting the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean.  His suggested route runs somewhat to the east of the continental divide and has a total length of slightly over ten thousand miles, in contrast to the real-life canal which is only fifty miles long.  The extra length and more-rugged terrain make his proposal much more difficult to build and maintain, unlike the real-life Panama Canal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, while the real-life canal significantly shortens the travel distance between major cities on the east and west coasts of the Americas, his alternative offers little benefit over traveling north or south in either the Atlantic or Pacific oceans. In fact, with the lack of currents that can aid travel and the slow speed required to traverse canal locks, it would be significantly slower.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text referencing the now-existing Panama Canal, and the fact that Randall's canal would need cross it at some point. The title text suggests that crossing two canals would have to be done via aqueduct, instead of the more useful at-grade crossing. The humor here is that this canal would be one of the most ambitious construction projects in history; an aqueduct being added to the costs is an expense on the same scale of needing an extra screw to hold something in on Apollo XI. The route depicted appears to cross the Mackenzie, Missouri, Rio Grande, and Amazon rivers anyway, so only this additional crossing is apparently &amp;quot;unreasonable.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing in front of a poster with two maps showing the Americas. He is pointing to the right one with a stick he is holding in his hand. Specifically to the red line going through the Americas from the Arctic sea above Canada near Alaska, down through North America, through the middle of Central America down through the middle of South America to end up in the Antarctic sea below the tip of South America. On the map to the left there is a similar red line indicating the Panama Canal crossing the thinnest part of Central America from the Pacific Oceanto the Atlantic Ocean. Both lines end in small dots on either &amp;quot;side&amp;quot; of the continent. The two maps have labels above them:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Atlantic-Pacific option&lt;br /&gt;
:Arctic-Antarctic option&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:I still don't understand why the Panama Canal planners rejected my proposal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*The Panama Canal was the main theme in [[1632: Palindrome]] and there is a scene in [[1608: Hoverboard]] where a [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/images/0/0d/1608_1026x1073y_Ruins_with_Cueball_singing_of_Spiders_and_Panama.png song that Cueball sings] references the canal. {{w|Panamax}} is referenced in the title text of [[1865: Wifi vs Cellular]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The second comic in a row with a [[:Category:Maps|map based theme]]. Randall likes maps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Maps]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2122:_Size_Venn_Diagram&amp;diff=170903</id>
		<title>Talk:2122: Size Venn Diagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2122:_Size_Venn_Diagram&amp;diff=170903"/>
				<updated>2019-03-11T16:51:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I think Randall kind of missed an opportunity with the title text: he should have used the new terms as a way to fill the blank areas in the diagram, for instance 'Great Emerald' for the currently empty set Great+Small+Little+Large.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.221|141.101.99.221]] 14:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I think the diagram itself is meant to be completely correct. But I didn't check all 100+ combinations. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 14:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, I believe the diagram is correct now, but as per the title text Randall will start using new combinations of terms, probably to get their usage mainstream and move the location of the words in the diagram. I'm saying he should have created terms that would fill some blank areas. For instance, his Large Dipper would make Dipper appear in the Big+Little+Large area where we already have League.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.95|141.101.99.95]] 15:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I understood what you said (the first time around) and agree.  Randall's title text is to acknowledge or engage the patterns he's discovered in the comic (as usual), and he could do that more thoroughly by making up words that would make the chart more balanced.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.100|162.158.78.100]] 16:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:He could also have placed “man” between “little” and “big” just to reference the movie ☺&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any such diagram will inevitably have small lacunae. But &amp;quot;Friendly Giant&amp;quot; is a particularly large one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.172|162.158.63.172]] 15:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Endian? Scott? Tits?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.112|108.162.219.112]] 15:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the transcript of what's in each category, what about a table to explain ''why'' the items categorized as they are, like:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Item&lt;br /&gt;
!Big&lt;br /&gt;
!Great&lt;br /&gt;
!Large&lt;br /&gt;
!Little&lt;br /&gt;
!Small&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Island&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawaii&lt;br /&gt;
|Cork Harbor, Ireland&lt;br /&gt;
|Antilles&lt;br /&gt;
|movie&lt;br /&gt;
|novel, movie&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pox&lt;br /&gt;
|n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|syphilis&lt;br /&gt;
|n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|disease&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|White&lt;br /&gt;
|BC ski resort&lt;br /&gt;
|shark&lt;br /&gt;
|pig&lt;br /&gt;
|n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|butterfly&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
{Unsigned|172.69.62.160}&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, it seems reasonable, I like it. Add it [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 15:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Second but leave the unused cells blank dont put N/A in the cell. [[User:M|M]] ([[User talk:M|talk]]) 16:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why, but the shape of this diagram feels really satisfying to me. [[User:Hawthorn|Hawthorn]] ([[User talk:Hawthorn|talk]]) 16:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:For me it’s just hard to look at. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 16:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again I wonder if he does these sorts of comics just to see how far we'll take it [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2121:_Light_Pollution&amp;diff=170786</id>
		<title>Talk:2121: Light Pollution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2121:_Light_Pollution&amp;diff=170786"/>
				<updated>2019-03-08T17:03:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Small error in this comic. It's not possible to tile a sphere with just hexagons. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/749264/covering-earth-with-hexagonal-map-tiles&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AlanKilian|AlanKilian]] ([[User talk:AlanKilian|talk]]) 16:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Six triangles form a hexagon - just an explanation for people with less mathematical or geometric knowledge. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::but a indefinite large group of triangles doesn't automatically transform to hexagons, since it could be overlapping hexagons, or hexagons with their interim spaces filled up by triangles?--[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Look at that hexagons (consisting of six triangles), each fitting to the next, and you will understand that this is only possible in a plane but not in a sphere. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh man where are the conspiracy nuts from a few weeks ago ;-) [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:03, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169872</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169872"/>
				<updated>2019-02-20T14:11:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've never seen anybody on this site so upset about completely-imagined content of the parent comment. What the fuck is &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; about posting a link to Wikipedia? In what way does speculation about in-universe organizations count as being a &amp;quot;vandal?&amp;quot; And in what universe did 162.158.93.27 ever say &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED?&amp;quot; Are you hallucinating? Do you need to adjust your medication? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.88|172.68.34.88]] 21:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The page was vandalized twice with the whole of the text replaced with &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED&amp;quot; (see below, and view edit history). Another IP editor replied to the comment below and seemed to imply it was them making the edits, even though the addresses don't match. So, it seems plausible that multiple IP users are actually the same (the two mentioned below, and the one mentioned above), since the tone and content of their comments are pretty similar. I believe this is what is being referred to.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::@Netehrin5 @Cgrimes85: I am the author of Feb 19 12:28 comment. First of all, it is my choice to either post &amp;quot;anonymously&amp;quot; or create an account, which is meaningless anyway as I could create many under any nick I choose. (IP address is somewhat random, blame today's ISPs, shortage of address space and complicated structure of today's Internet. In fact, 162.158.* belongs to [[wikipedia:Cloudflare|Cloudflare]] which means the originator of the content could be virtually anybody. Do some research before drawing conclusions.) Please stop insinuating that a particular edit of discussion space is related to some other edit of page space when you don't and can't have any proof, and specifically that the texts and purposes of edits are obviously unrelated. But to the point: Randall is trying to posit that suppressing valid science is next to impossible today, but it does not mean it had not been tried in the past with mixed success and &amp;amp;ndash; sadly &amp;amp;ndash; tragic fates of the involved. I have just provided one quite well-known and relatively recent example, there are many more. The reason I've posted it (in somewhat sarcastic form) in the ''discussion'' space is that in my opinion it just did not deserve being included in the main text &amp;amp;mdash; that's what discussion space is for! -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.223|162.158.89.223]] 10:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I apologize for lumping you in with the two IP editors (including the vandal) below, which I do still believe to be the same person for the reasons I mentioned above. I was more replying to the comment asking where &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH...&amp;quot; had come from, as I was guessing the editor hadn't seen the vandalism. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 14:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark energy IS the conspiracy! Quantum Inertia is being suppressed by [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/436874/does-quantized-inertia-theory-violate-conservation-of-momentum Physics Exchange]! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.59|162.158.91.59]] 08:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's because you are censoring me, so I'm showing you the same. Soon the truth will be revealed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.160|108.162.245.160]] 18:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Please look up the definition of the word censor, conspiracy theory, science, and wiki.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That individual is obviously trying to suppress the explanation -- they must be with the Physics Mafia.  However the powers that be here likely have the larger powers of Ban. [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 21:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
https://xkcd.com/1357/[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.58|162.158.214.58]] 02:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pet Conspiracy Theory - that individual is Randall, adding some meta lulz. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.150|162.158.90.150]] 09:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Technical Note:''' please take into consideration that IP addresses published by the wiki engine for not-logged-in persons are not the addresses of particular editors' computers, but of [[wikipedia:Cloudflare|Cloudflare]] servers, which act as proxies to protect this website from some forms of attack, '''not''' including editing vandalism. Therefore similarity of the addresses could not be construed as evidence that the same person is performing edits. We need to defend in the usual way, reversing edits. Hopefully there are fewer vandals than benevolent contributors.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169871</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169871"/>
				<updated>2019-02-20T14:11:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've never seen anybody on this site so upset about completely-imagined content of the parent comment. What the fuck is &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; about posting a link to Wikipedia? In what way does speculation about in-universe organizations count as being a &amp;quot;vandal?&amp;quot; And in what universe did 162.158.93.27 ever say &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED?&amp;quot; Are you hallucinating? Do you need to adjust your medication? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.88|172.68.34.88]] 21:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The page was vandalized twice with the whole of the text replaced with &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED&amp;quot; (see below, and view edit history). Another IP editor replied to the comment below and seemed to imply it was them making the edits, even though the addresses don't match. So, it seems plausible that multiple IP users are actually the same (the two mentioned below, and the one mentioned above), since the tone and content of their comments are pretty similar. I believe this is what is being referred to.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::@Netehrin5 @Cgrimes85: I am the author of Feb 19 12:28 comment. First of all, it is my choice to either post &amp;quot;anonymously&amp;quot; or create an account, which is meaningless anyway as I could create many under any nick I choose. (IP address is somewhat random, blame today's ISPs, shortage of address space and complicated structure of today's Internet. In fact, 162.158.* belongs to [[wikipedia:Cloudflare|Cloudflare]] which means the originator of the content could be virtually anybody. Do some research before drawing conclusions.) Please stop insinuating that a particular edit of discussion space is related to some other edit of page space when you don't and can't have any proof, and specifically that the texts and purposes of edits are obviously unrelated. But to the point: Randall is trying to posit that suppressing valid science is next to impossible today, but it does not mean it had not been tried in the past with mixed success and &amp;amp;ndash; sadly &amp;amp;ndash; tragic fates of the involved. I have just provided one quite well-known and relatively recent example, there are many more. The reason I've posted it (in somewhat sarcastic form) in the ''discussion'' space is that in my opinion it just did not deserve being included in the main text &amp;amp;mdash; that's what discussion space is for! -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.223|162.158.89.223]] 10:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I apologize for lumping you in with the two IP editors (including the vandal) below, which I do still believe to be the same person for the reasons I mentioned above. I was more replying to the comment asking where &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH...&amp;quot; had come from, as I was guessing the editor hadn't seen the vandalism. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 14:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark energy IS the conspiracy! Quantum Inertia is being suppressed by [https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/436874/does-quantized-inertia-theory-violate-conservation-of-momentum Physics Exchange]! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.59|162.158.91.59]] 08:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's because you are censoring me, so I'm showing you the same. Soon the truth will be revealed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.160|108.162.245.160]] 18:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Please look up the definition of the word censor, conspiracy theory, science, and wiki.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That individual is obviously trying to suppress the explanation -- they must be with the Physics Mafia.  However the powers that be here likely have the larger powers of Ban. [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 21:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
https://xkcd.com/1357/[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.58|162.158.214.58]] 02:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pet Conspiracy Theory - that individual is Randall, adding some meta lulz. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.150|162.158.90.150]] 09:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Technical Note:''' please take into consideration that IP addresses published by the wiki engine for not-logged-in persons are not the addresses of particular editors' computers, but of [[wikipedia:Cloudflare|Cloudflare]] servers, which act as proxies to protect this website from some forms of attack, '''not''' including editing vandalism. Therefore similarity of the addresses could not be construed as evidence that the same person is performing edits. We need to defend in the usual way, reversing edits. Hopefully there are fewer vandals than benevolent contributors.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169860</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169860"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T21:37:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* IP editor deleting all content */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've never seen anybody on this site so upset about completely-imagined content of the parent comment. What the fuck is &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; about posting a link to Wikipedia? In what way does speculation about in-universe organizations count as being a &amp;quot;vandal?&amp;quot; And in what universe did 162.158.93.27 ever say &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED?&amp;quot; Are you hallucinating? Do you need to adjust your medication? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.88|172.68.34.88]] 21:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The page was vandalized twice with the whole of the text replaced with &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED&amp;quot; (see below, and view edit history). Another IP editor replied to the comment below and seemed to imply it was them making the edits, even though the addresses don't match. So, it seems plausible that multiple IP users are actually the same (the two mentioned below, and the one mentioned above), since the tone and content of their comments are pretty similar. I believe this is what is being referred to.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's because you are censoring me, so I'm showing you the same. Soon the truth will be revealed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.160|108.162.245.160]] 18:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Please look up the definition of the word censor, conspiracy theory, science, and wiki.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169859</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169859"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T21:36:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* IP editor deleting all content */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've never seen anybody on this site so upset about completely-imagined content of the parent comment. What the fuck is &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; about posting a link to Wikipedia? In what way does speculation about in-universe organizations count as being a &amp;quot;vandal?&amp;quot; And in what universe did 162.158.93.27 ever say &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED?&amp;quot; Are you hallucinating? Do you need to adjust your medication? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.88|172.68.34.88]] 21:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The page was vandalized twice with the whole of the text replaced with &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED&amp;quot; (see below, and view edit history). Another IP editor replied to the comment below and seemed to imply it was them making the edits, even though the addresses don't match. So, it seems plausible that multiple IP users are actually the same (the two mentioned below, and the one mentioned above), since the tone and content of their comments are pretty similar. I believe this is what is being referred to.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's because you are censoring me, so I'm showing you the same. Soon the truth will be revealed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.160|108.162.245.160]] 18:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Please look up the definition of the word censor, conspiracy theory, science, and wiki.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169858</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169858"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T21:34:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've never seen anybody on this site so upset about completely-imagined content of the parent comment. What the fuck is &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; about posting a link to Wikipedia? In what way does speculation about in-universe organizations count as being a &amp;quot;vandal?&amp;quot; And in what universe did 162.158.93.27 ever say &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED?&amp;quot; Are you hallucinating? Do you need to adjust your medication? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.88|172.68.34.88]] 21:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The page was vandalized twice with the whole of the text replaced with &amp;quot;SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED&amp;quot; (see below, and view edit history). Another IP editor replied to the comment below and seemed to imply it was them making the edits, even though the addresses don't match. So, it seems plausible that multiple IP users are actually the same (the two mentioned below, and the one mentioned above), since the tone and content of their comments are pretty similar. I believe this is what is being referred to.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's because you are censoring me, so I'm showing you the same. Soon the truth will be revealed. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.160|108.162.245.160]] 18:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Please look up the definition of the word censor, conspiracy theory, science, and wiki.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 18:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169843</id>
		<title>Talk:2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169843"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T17:19:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* IP editor deleting all content */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That's how mafia works. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.111|172.69.134.111]] 16:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But White Hat didn't mention anything about a Mafia...? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.153|162.158.74.153]] 14:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, but to suppress people publishing their results, a body like the mafia would be needed, is what Megan jokes about. And then takes an example (and one more in title text) about annoying results that did not get suppressed. Her example turned out to win a noble prize, the title text was later shown to be an error. But a mafia might have stopped both sets of results to have not been published. Basically proving that you can not suppress such results wether relevant or not. If White Hat's model is not taken serious it is probably because he has no data to back it up. Wild claims demands extraordinary well documentation. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A &amp;quot;mafia&amp;quot; isn't the only candiate. &amp;quot;Inquistions&amp;quot; have also worked well for suppression, but (AFAIK) have less of a history of intramural violence. I think the image of a cabal of cloaked physics monks torturing dark energy heretics into recantation would have been striking enough, but RMMV (Randall's Mileage May Vary). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.23|172.69.70.23]] 17:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::if you need to spell out your initialism in full, you may not realize they're intended as shorthand.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another fictional candidate may be &amp;quot;science by political committee&amp;quot; system &amp;amp;mdash; sending physicists that contest the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;politically correct&amp;quot; theories and models to &amp;quot;corrective labour camps&amp;quot;, where they would be forced to perform physical (sic!) work, until their untimely demise... Oh, wait, that actually happened! (See the fate of [[wikipedia:Nikolai Vavilov|Nikolai Vavilov]]) -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.27|162.158.93.27]] 12:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::When did this site get like this? This may not be you specifically, but there’s been a lot more conspiracy theories as of late, and even some anti-semetism. I keep seeing “SOON THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED”. Knock it off please, you aren’t cool, just edgy, a vandal, and an annoyance. Also, to no ones surprise, the Russians and Nazis did bad things in WWII. Also, what the hell does politically correct physics death camps have to do with a Russian botanist who Stalin didn’t like? I’ll stay on topic if you do. [[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Dark energy isn't a direct consequence of the cosmological constant. The cosmological constant could potentially have been 0 or even negative. There's nothing that currently implies that it should be a positive number. That's exactly why it is annoying. If general relativity dictated it, people would just praise this as another result showing relativity is true. But since it doesn't, it needs an explanation. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.6|172.68.65.6]] 21:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it could be true that White Hat is ignored because of the lack of supporting data, Albert Einstein was in a similar situation when coming up with his Theory of Relativity. [[User:Mad max|Mad max]] ([[User talk:Mad max|talk]]) 06:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP editor deleting all content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IP User 162.158.106.252 is deleting the entire page for some reason.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169842</id>
		<title>2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169842"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T17:18:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: Undo revision 169840 by 162.158.106.252 (talk) Is there something I'm missing here? Stop erasing the entire page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2113&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 18, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Physics Suppression&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = physics_suppression.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If physics had a mafia, I'm pretty sure the BICEP2 mess would have ended in bloodshed.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by the Physics Mafia. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[White Hat]] is mad at physicists in general and directs his fury at [[Megan]], a physicist. He has a theory and blames physicists for suppressing it. He believes that no one takes it seriously because his theory would disrupt the standard model in physics. He believes they do this because his theory would be inconvenient to accept, causing them to have to change their current models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Megan is not taking him seriously and instead states that she did not know that physicists had a Mafia that was able to suppress anyone from publishing annoying results. She continues that if such a group were there to do so, then why were they not there to stop the people who published results about dark energy? The {{w|Mafia}} is a criminal organization famous for their use of force to get their way, and while White Hat didn't mention the Mafia, Megan is facetious in her mentioning them because they would be an extreme example of a group that could do what White Hat seems to think is being done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She acknowledges that the &amp;quot;dark energy people&amp;quot; were awarded a {{w|Nobel Prize}} (in {{w|List_of_Nobel_laureates_in_Physics#Laureates|2011}}), but she's still mad at them for the &amp;quot;trouble&amp;quot; this new concept caused for other physicists, including her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Dark energy}} is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Even though &amp;quot;dark energy&amp;quot; is a direct consequence of {{w|Albert Einstein|Albert Einstein's}} &amp;quot;{{w|cosmological constant}}&amp;quot; in the field equations of {{w|general relativity}}, its actual discovery was still seen as a surprise within the physics community. Einstein called the cosmological constant his &amp;quot;greatest blunder&amp;quot;[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06768.pdf], but the concept was revived after the observation that cosmic expansion was accelerating. In the comic, Megan says that if scientists were able to suppress inconvenient ideas, dark energy would likely have been such a case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that White Hat doesn't state that he actually has some results, but just a theory that contradicts known physics.  The reason the &amp;quot;dark energy people&amp;quot; got a Nobel Prize is that the experiments and measurements show that they were onto something real. It seems like White Hat currently only has a model, and not data, to back his theory up which is probably why his theory is being ignored (which he decides to interpret as &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions {{w|BICEP2}} (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization, 2nd generation) which was part of a series of instruments used to measure the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). On 17 March 2014, it was announced, to much fanfare, that BICEP2 had detected B-modes from gravitational waves in the early universe (called primordial gravitational waves). A few years later, this announcement had to be backtracked as it was found that most, if not all, of the reported signal was actually due to interstellar dust within the Milky Way.[https://www.nature.com/news/full-galaxy-dust-map-muddles-search-for-gravitational-waves-1.15975] The word BICEP2 is a word play with the biceps brachii, a large arm muscle, indicative of physical strength.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text notes that if there had been a physics mafia, then those results would have ended in bloodshed due to the controversy they caused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[White Hat, with his hands balled into fist and held up above him, is talking with Megan.]&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: You physicists are suppressing my theory because it's inconvenient for your models!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Wait, we have a mafia that can suppress annoying results?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''Why didn't they do something about the dark energy people?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: We gave them a Nobel prize but I'm still mad at them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169839</id>
		<title>2113: Physics Suppression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2113:_Physics_Suppression&amp;diff=169839"/>
				<updated>2019-02-19T17:14:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: Undo revision 169838 by 162.158.106.252 (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2113&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 18, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Physics Suppression&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = physics_suppression.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If physics had a mafia, I'm pretty sure the BICEP2 mess would have ended in bloodshed.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by the Physics Mafia. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[White Hat]] is mad at physicists in general and directs his fury at [[Megan]], a physicist. He has a theory and blames physicists for suppressing it. He believes that no one takes it seriously because his theory would disrupt the standard model in physics. He believes they do this because his theory would be inconvenient to accept, causing them to have to change their current models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Megan is not taking him seriously and instead states that she did not know that physicists had a Mafia that was able to suppress anyone from publishing annoying results. She continues that if such a group were there to do so, then why were they not there to stop the people who published results about dark energy? The {{w|Mafia}} is a criminal organization famous for their use of force to get their way, and while White Hat didn't mention the Mafia, Megan is facetious in her mentioning them because they would be an extreme example of a group that could do what White Hat seems to think is being done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She acknowledges that the &amp;quot;dark energy people&amp;quot; were awarded a {{w|Nobel Prize}} (in {{w|List_of_Nobel_laureates_in_Physics#Laureates|2011}}), but she's still mad at them for the &amp;quot;trouble&amp;quot; this new concept caused for other physicists, including her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Dark energy}} is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Even though &amp;quot;dark energy&amp;quot; is a direct consequence of {{w|Albert Einstein|Albert Einstein's}} &amp;quot;{{w|cosmological constant}}&amp;quot; in the field equations of {{w|general relativity}}, its actual discovery was still seen as a surprise within the physics community. Einstein called the cosmological constant his &amp;quot;greatest blunder&amp;quot;[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06768.pdf], but the concept was revived after the observation that cosmic expansion was accelerating. In the comic, Megan says that if scientists were able to suppress inconvenient ideas, dark energy would likely have been such a case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that White Hat doesn't state that he actually has some results, but just a theory that contradicts known physics.  The reason the &amp;quot;dark energy people&amp;quot; got a Nobel Prize is that the experiments and measurements show that they were onto something real. It seems like White Hat currently only has a model, and not data, to back his theory up which is probably why his theory is being ignored (which he decides to interpret as &amp;quot;suppression&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions {{w|BICEP2}} (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization, 2nd generation) which was part of a series of instruments used to measure the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). On 17 March 2014, it was announced, to much fanfare, that BICEP2 had detected B-modes from gravitational waves in the early universe (called primordial gravitational waves). A few years later, this announcement had to be backtracked as it was found that most, if not all, of the reported signal was actually due to interstellar dust within the Milky Way.[https://www.nature.com/news/full-galaxy-dust-map-muddles-search-for-gravitational-waves-1.15975] The word BICEP2 is a word play with the biceps brachii, a large arm muscle, indicative of physical strength.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text notes that if there had been a physics mafia, then those results would have ended in bloodshed due to the controversy they caused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[White Hat, with his hands balled into fist and held up above him, is talking with Megan.]&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: You physicists are suppressing my theory because it's inconvenient for your models!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Wait, we have a mafia that can suppress annoying results?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''Why didn't they do something about the dark energy people?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: We gave them a Nobel prize but I'm still mad at them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169220</id>
		<title>2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169220"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T20:37:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */ &amp;quot;this region of New England&amp;quot; is just called &amp;quot;Rhode Island&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2108&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 6, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Carbonated Beverage Language Map&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = carbonated_beverage_language_map.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = There's one person in Missouri who says &amp;quot;carbo bev&amp;quot; who the entire rest of the country HATES.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by ONE GUY IN MISSOURI. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the US, people in various parts of the country refer to carbonated beverages by {{w|Names for soft drinks in the United States|different names}} such as Soda, Pop, Coke, etc. Generally, the West Coast and Northeast say &amp;quot;Soda&amp;quot;, the South says &amp;quot;Coke&amp;quot; and the rest of the country says &amp;quot;Pop&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various maps of the name differences, including: [http://www.popvssoda.com/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This map leverages xkcd's mockery-maps of regional and state-by-state differences or variations in the use of language and overlays the regional variances in the terms for soda pop (for example: https://laughingsquid.com/soda-pop-or-coke-maps-of-regional-dialect-variation-in-the-united-states/), as was made trending and popular in 2013. Not only are there far more terms than are actually used by Americans, many are terms for other drinks (mead), unrelated liquids (quicksilver), or copyrighted beverage names (Code Red) -- and in one case, something that's not even edible ({{w|cryptocurrency|&amp;quot;Crypto&amp;quot;}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Map terms (from left to right, approximately)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fanta&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage line&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Söde&lt;br /&gt;
|Presumably pronounced &amp;quot;soda&amp;quot; but spelled oddly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|True Water&lt;br /&gt;
|Possibly a reference to True Blood, a fictional artificial blood substitute for vampires in The Southern Vampire Mysteries book series by Charlaine Harris, and the television series True Blood.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Crypto&lt;br /&gt;
|A term for encryption, popularized by the rise of blockchain-based currencies.  Not drinkable.  Possibly a joke that the residents of Silicon Valley are actually computers who &amp;quot;drink&amp;quot; crypto (i.e. data).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yum&lt;br /&gt;
|Carbonated beverages are generally sweet, and therefore taste good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sparkle Fluid&lt;br /&gt;
|Roughly analogously to how &amp;quot;sparkling wine&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;sparkling cider&amp;quot; are carbonated varieties of wine and cider, &amp;quot;sparkling fluid&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sparkle fluid&amp;quot; would presumably be any carbonated fluid&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|King Cola&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pepsi&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Crystal Pepsi}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ichor&lt;br /&gt;
|several definitions (blood of a god (or demon, or, in some dialects, any insect) or watery discharge from a wound).  None of them carbonated.  None of them recommended as a drinkable liquid.  (Well, not by someone with your best interests at heart.)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|You-Know-What&lt;br /&gt;
|A phrase typically employed when a more specific term is considered unspeakable.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tab&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Spicewater&lt;br /&gt;
|Potentially a reference to the spice from ''Dune''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Softie&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ohio Tea&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Boat Drink&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Melt&lt;br /&gt;
|Usually used to describe a kind of sandwich where cheese is melted in the center, usually on a griddle. Or maybe just a way to say &amp;quot;no, the *melted* ice&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fizz Ooze&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Punch&lt;br /&gt;
|A drink typically found in the juice aisle.  Only sometimes carbonated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fun Wine&lt;br /&gt;
|Implies that normal wine is not &amp;quot;fun&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Diet&lt;br /&gt;
|Sometimes refers to a carbonated beverage.  A common request in restaurants, as they often only have a single &amp;quot;diet soda&amp;quot; option for customers to pick. Ironically, &amp;quot;diet&amp;quot; sodas have been causally linked to metabolism related weight gain.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Refill&lt;br /&gt;
|The second glass of whatever you drank previously.  Works for any drinkable liquid.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tickle Juice&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a Boston-based jazz band. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bubble Honey&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sugar Oil&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Wet Drink&lt;br /&gt;
|Technically true of all drinks, unless one is attempting to drink sand. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Code Red&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mead&lt;br /&gt;
|An alcoholic drink.  Traditionally not carbonated.  Often associated with Vikings, and these areas did have many Scandinavian immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Canadian Ale&lt;br /&gt;
|Probably a reference to the Canada Dry brand of Ginger Ale, a non-alcoholic carbonated beverage.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Aether&lt;br /&gt;
|Could refer to a highly flammable industrial solvent, also used as an anesthetic.  Do not drink.  Also, not carbonated. Alternately, could refer to the nonexistent fluid that was believed to carry light waves before electromagnetism was fully understood, or poetically to the sky; in either case it is not a drinkable liquid (or carbonated).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Carbonated Beverage&lt;br /&gt;
|Technically correct, but a bit of an awkward term due to its unnecessary length.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mouthwater&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Capri&lt;br /&gt;
|Capri Sun is a brand of juice drinks, typically sold in uncarbonated pouches.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Skim Shake&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kid's Coffee&lt;br /&gt;
|Somewhat accurate.  Coffee is typically drunk by adults for its caffeine.  Carbonated beverages often have caffeine also, and are often consumed by children.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Regular&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tang&lt;br /&gt;
|An orange flavored beverage containing less than 2% juice extract, not carbonated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Formula&lt;br /&gt;
|Typically refers to an artificial replacement for mother's milk.  Not carbonated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Medicine&lt;br /&gt;
|Only sometimes a drinkable liquid.  Never or perhaps almost never carbonated.  Alternatively, a common euphemism for alcohol, or some other drink that the person doesn't want to admit to drinking -- or at least doesn't want to share. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Broth&lt;br /&gt;
|Liquid in which bones, meat, fish, or vegetables have simmered.  Often used as a soup base.  Not carbonated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fool's Champagne&lt;br /&gt;
|Carbonated beverage is to champagne what fool's gold is to gold.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sugar Milk&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|No word for them&lt;br /&gt;
|This region of the US does not have a word for carbonated beverages (according to Randall).  Apparently they do not drink them at all.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hydro&lt;br /&gt;
|A word for water.  Carbonated water does exist, but this word means all forms of water.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harvard Tea&lt;br /&gt;
|The region shades this way includes {{w|Cambridge, Massachusetts}}, which is home to {{w|Harvard University}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bubbler&lt;br /&gt;
|A nod to another popular map of the same type, exploring the regional dialects used to describe drinking fountains.  Rhode Island and the eastern portion of Wisconsin are the only two locations where 'Bubbler' is commonly used to refer to drinking fountains.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mouthbuzz&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Brad's Elixer&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hot Water&lt;br /&gt;
|Not carbonated.  Not even in Jacuzzi and hot tubs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluid&lt;br /&gt;
|A word that means nearly any liquid in existence.  Not specific to carbonated beverages.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Coke Zero&lt;br /&gt;
|Name of a carbonated beverage.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Carbo&lt;br /&gt;
|Sodas sweetened with corn syrup or cane sugar are high in carbohydrates. Could also refer to carbonation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Quicksilver&lt;br /&gt;
|An old term for the element mercury, a metallic liquid in its pure form at room temperature.  Extremely harmful if swallowed.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Glug&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Water Plus&lt;br /&gt;
|Technically the name of {{w|Water Plus|a British water retail services provider}}, this likely refers to the prevalence of &amp;quot;plus&amp;quot; as a preposition in branding nomenclature (e.g.: {{w|Google+}}, {{w|iPhone 8 Plus}}, {{w|7 Up Plus}}, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text may be a wry comment in light of the pocket of &amp;quot;soda&amp;quot; in the St. Louis, MO area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A map of the United States divided into purple, red, green, blue, and yellow colored regions...&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Maps]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169169</id>
		<title>Talk:2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169169"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:40:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering what the joke behind the weird shapes of &amp;quot;softie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;punch&amp;quot; are about. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Bubbler&amp;quot; is definitely a reference to people in Rhode Island calling drinking fountains &amp;quot;bubblers&amp;quot;.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The “bubbler” term is used in some areas of Wisconsin, too; I wonder how that happened. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.108|172.68.59.108]] 17:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Interesting. I didn't know that. In this case though, the map is pointing directly at RI. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169167</id>
		<title>Talk:2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169167"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:25:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering what the joke behind the weird shapes of &amp;quot;softie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;punch&amp;quot; are about. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Bubbler&amp;quot; is definitely a reference to people in Rhode Island calling drinking fountains &amp;quot;bubblers&amp;quot;.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169166</id>
		<title>Talk:2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169166"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:23:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering what the joke behind the weird shapes of &amp;quot;softie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;punch&amp;quot; are about. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Bubbler&amp;quot; is definitely a reference to people in Rhode Island calling drinking fountains &amp;quot;bubblers&amp;quot;.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169165</id>
		<title>Talk:2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169165"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:22:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering what the joke behind the weird shapes of &amp;quot;softie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;punch&amp;quot; are about. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169163</id>
		<title>2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169163"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:19:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2108&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 6, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Carbonated Beverage Language Map&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = carbonated_beverage_language_map.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = There's one person in Missouri who says &amp;quot;carbo bev&amp;quot; who the entire rest of the country HATES.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by ONE GUY IN MISSOURI. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the US, people in various parts of the country refer to carbonated beverages by [http://popvssoda.com/ different names] such as Soda, Pop, Coke, etc. The comic takes this to ridiculous extremes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A map of the United States divided into colored regions...&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly a parody of this map: http://www.popvssoda.com/countystats/total-county.html&lt;br /&gt;
The isolated regions surrounding Atlanta and the Twin Cities are probably a reference to the similar pattern around St. Louis in the real map. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.78.40|172.68.78.40]] 17:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169160</id>
		<title>2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169160"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:17:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2108&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 6, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Carbonated Beverage Language Map&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = carbonated_beverage_language_map.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = There's one person in Missouri who says &amp;quot;carbo bev&amp;quot; who the entire rest of the country HATES.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by ONE GUY IN MISSOURI. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the US, people in various parts of the country refer to carbonated beverages by [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/soda-vs-pop_n_2103764 different names] such as Soda, Pop, Coke, etc. The comic takes this to ridiculous extremes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169159</id>
		<title>2108: Carbonated Beverage Language Map</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2108:_Carbonated_Beverage_Language_Map&amp;diff=169159"/>
				<updated>2019-02-06T17:15:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2108&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 6, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Carbonated Beverage Language Map&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = carbonated_beverage_language_map.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = There's one person in Missouri who says &amp;quot;carbo bev&amp;quot; who the entire rest of the country HATES.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by ONE GUY IN MISSOURI. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2099:_Missal_of_Silos&amp;diff=168202</id>
		<title>Talk:2099: Missal of Silos</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2099:_Missal_of_Silos&amp;diff=168202"/>
				<updated>2019-01-16T17:41:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: nevermind. it's a missile base, but the missiles are elsewhere in the area&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2099:_Missal_of_Silos&amp;diff=168201</id>
		<title>Talk:2099: Missal of Silos</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2099:_Missal_of_Silos&amp;diff=168201"/>
				<updated>2019-01-16T17:40:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Warren AFB in Cheyenne is a missile base, I have no idea where the &amp;quot;military airport but no nukes&amp;quot; statement came from. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 17:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2077:_Heist&amp;diff=166359</id>
		<title>Talk:2077: Heist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2077:_Heist&amp;diff=166359"/>
				<updated>2018-11-26T16:42:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You know, this isn't just a movie trope, this is an actual technique that is used ALL the time: https://youtu.be/rnmcRTnTNC8?t=2000 Is this worth mentioning in the explanation? [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2077:_Heist&amp;diff=166358</id>
		<title>Talk:2077: Heist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2077:_Heist&amp;diff=166358"/>
				<updated>2018-11-26T16:42:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You know, this isn't just a movie trope, this is an actual technique that is used ALL the time: https://youtu.be/rnmcRTnTNC8?t=2000 [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2073:_Kilogram&amp;diff=166039</id>
		<title>Talk:2073: Kilogram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2073:_Kilogram&amp;diff=166039"/>
				<updated>2018-11-16T19:18:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't know that weights and currencies could be converted 1:1, that's cool! [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 16:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wish they ''had'' redefined the kilogram a little bit. It would have been neat if 1 kg was exactly the weight of 1 dm^3 (1 litre) of water under one atmosphere of pressure. Right now it's soooo close. It's a good enough estimate for simple maths, but whenever you tell people that a litre of water weighs one kilogram the pedants comes out of the woodworks... [[User:Kapten-N|Kapten-N]] ([[User talk:Kapten-N|talk]]) 16:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until 1964 a litre (and therefore actually the metre too) used to be defined as the volume that water with mass 1kg takes. But this is not good for exact measurements not only because you need exactly reproducable temperature, pressure (not so problematic, because you can measure them and then calculate the divergence) and gravity (not so easy to measure, because you need an exact mass and exact masses are impossible to keep the same), but also because you need pure water free of any polutions of other stuff (hard and expensive) and even free of tiny amounts of isotopes which are deuterium and tritium (even way more expensive).&lt;br /&gt;
Because the water that was used then was never close to pure the actual weight of water nowadays is 0.99997kg at 4°C and 1.013bar and I don't know which value for g. There is also another definition which I like, but is hard to measure in real life scenarios: E=mc². A kilogramm should be 1/c² of the mass which anything becomes heavier that you accelerate by the energy of one Joule. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.150|162.158.90.150]] 17:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But how do you define/measure a Joule then? [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, until 1964, meter and litre were totally independent, a meter has never been defined directly or indirectly in relation to a mass of water. It is only since 1964 that the liter is defined as a cubic decimeter.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.36|162.158.90.36]] 18:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, in E=mc², E is the energy '''at rest''' (for a stationary object of mass m), so your definition using the acceleration makes no sense.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.88.254|162.158.88.254]] 18:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, for the new definition of the kilo using the Kibble balance you need to measure the gravity... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.134.16|162.158.134.16]] 17:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welp, looks like 1 kg, a.k.a. 1 lb, a.k.a 2.2 lb, is now officially defined to have zero mass.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.50.28|172.69.50.28]] 16:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:…or infinite. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 16:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::What I understand: the joke is not (only) about 1 (old) kg = 1 (old) lb, but (also) about 1 new kg = 1 old lb... or 1 new lb = 1 old kg :^) Or about a ring of positive characteristic --[[Special:Contributions/188.114.102.94|188.114.102.94]] 17:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
what about the ambiguity of the pound? would they reference an Avoirdupois  bound or a Troy lb? --wonderkatn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't believe the Imperial system is &amp;quot;no longer used&amp;quot;. Gills have been retired, but yards and even chains are still in use, not to mention the Imperial &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;lb&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; pint. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 18:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The imperial system has some good things about it. Feet are divisible by 12, and Fahrenheit is much nicer for human temperatures. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 18:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, coz it's so easier to divide by 12 than to divide by 10!&lt;br /&gt;
:::No it is easier to divide by 2, 3, 4, and 6, and yes, I can divide the number of feet by 10 easily in my head. [[User:SDSpivey|SDSpivey]] ([[User talk:SDSpivey|talk]]) 19:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The idea is that with twelve parts, you can have 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6, and 1/12 all be integer number of parts. This is why these types of systems developed in the past, and why so many systems also had multiples of 60 (you can do the math here.). They were easy to divide by merchants without access to any sort of calculation method. The base-10 system is great if you're only ever dealing with halves or tenths. But if you want a quarter or a third of something, you have to split the base units. It's no longer necessary in modern life, but it had a real advantage in ancient times. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 19:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162458</id>
		<title>Talk:2043: Boathouses and Houseboats</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162458"/>
				<updated>2018-09-07T16:56:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: Removing changed comic comment. Already addressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The state of California already believes that a house held by a car is a housecar:&lt;br /&gt;
:Vehicle Code - VEH&lt;br /&gt;
:DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED [100 - 681]  ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )&lt;br /&gt;
:362.  &lt;br /&gt;
:A “house car” is a motor vehicle originally designed, or permanently altered, and equipped for human habitation, or to which a camper has been permanently attached. A motor vehicle to which a camper has been temporarily attached is not a house car except that, for the purposes of Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) and Division 12 (commencing with Section 24000), a motor vehicle equipped with a camper having an axle that is designed to support a portion of the weight of the camper unit shall be considered a three-axle house car regardless of the method of attachment or manner of registration. A house car shall not be deemed to be a motortruck.[http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&amp;amp;sectionNum=362.]&lt;br /&gt;
Bonus:  &amp;quot;motortruck&amp;quot; does indeed refer to a truck that holds a motor.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 15:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall did just correct the comic. The first version said &amp;quot;this [row] held by this [column]&amp;quot;, which would have meant, that e.g. a towtruck is a car held by a car, which is just wrong. It has just be updated to the correct &amp;quot;a this [column] that holds a this [row]&amp;quot;. I do not know how to change that here. Should be mentioned in Trivia [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your eagle eyes. I've uploaded the new version, please be patient until the cache is expired and you can see it. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Boat boat'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't a boat that holds another boat be some sort of either carrier, or at-sea repair dock?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sort of like a mothership, or a drydock?&lt;br /&gt;
Or an oil rig (technically considered a ship by international law), etc?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For that matter, how about the distinction between a boat and a ship?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 16:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:well... with the original version it fits. a boat held by another boat is a lifeboat. But the new version it doesnt. a boat that holds another boat would be, as you say, carrier, mothership, etc. looks like randall didn't think this through to the end... [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Floating Drydock? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_dock#Floating] {{unsigned|OldCorps}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're entirely correct on both counts. Lifeboats are carried by other boats, and ships that can carry other ships do exist. This comic also fails to distinguish between boats and ships, and cars, trucks, and trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
While a Boathouse is indeed a house for boats, a boat ''trailer'' is usually a trailer and not a car- the name already follows Randell's suggested logic: it's a trailer (characterized by lacking it's own engine, steering, and driver's cabin) that holds one or more boats. In addition, both tow trucks and car carriers are large enough to be properly referred to as trucks (the smallest type of tow truck I know of is built on a pickup truck chassis) and are fully capable to towing or carrying other trucks as well as cars, making the term carcar inaccurate. Yes, I'm being pedantic, but this might be worth mentioning in explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.122.60|162.158.122.60]] 16:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Chris Long&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162456</id>
		<title>Talk:2043: Boathouses and Houseboats</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162456"/>
				<updated>2018-09-07T16:54:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Comic changed */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The state of California already believes that a house held by a car is a housecar:&lt;br /&gt;
:Vehicle Code - VEH&lt;br /&gt;
:DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED [100 - 681]  ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )&lt;br /&gt;
:362.  &lt;br /&gt;
:A “house car” is a motor vehicle originally designed, or permanently altered, and equipped for human habitation, or to which a camper has been permanently attached. A motor vehicle to which a camper has been temporarily attached is not a house car except that, for the purposes of Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) and Division 12 (commencing with Section 24000), a motor vehicle equipped with a camper having an axle that is designed to support a portion of the weight of the camper unit shall be considered a three-axle house car regardless of the method of attachment or manner of registration. A house car shall not be deemed to be a motortruck.[http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&amp;amp;sectionNum=362.]&lt;br /&gt;
Bonus:  &amp;quot;motortruck&amp;quot; does indeed refer to a truck that holds a motor.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 15:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall did just correct the comic. The first version said &amp;quot;this [row] held by this [column]&amp;quot;, which would have meant, that e.g. a towtruck is a car held by a car, which is just wrong. It has just be updated to the correct &amp;quot;a this [column] that holds a this [row]&amp;quot;. I do not know how to change that here. Should be mentioned in Trivia [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your eagle eyes. I've uploaded the new version, please be patient until the cache is expired and you can see it. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Boat boat'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't a boat that holds another boat be some sort of either carrier, or at-sea repair dock?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sort of like a mothership, or a drydock?&lt;br /&gt;
Or an oil rig (technically considered a ship by international law), etc?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For that matter, how about the distinction between a boat and a ship?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 16:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:well... with the original version it fits. a boat held by another boat is a lifeboat. But the new version it doesnt. a boat that holds another boat would be, as you say, carrier, mothership, etc. looks like randall didn't think this through to the end... [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Floating Drydock? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_dock#Floating] {{unsigned|OldCorps}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're entirely correct on both counts. Lifeboats are carried by other boats, and ships that can carry other ships do exist. This comic also fails to distinguish between boats and ships, and cars, trucks, and trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
While a Boathouse is indeed a house for boats, a boat ''trailer'' is usually a trailer and not a car- the name already follows Randell's suggested logic: it's a trailer (characterized by lacking it's own engine, steering, and driver's cabin) that holds one or more boats. In addition, both tow trucks and car carriers are large enough to be properly referred to as trucks (the smallest type of tow truck I know of is built on a pickup truck chassis) and are fully capable to towing or carrying other trucks as well as cars, making the term carcar inaccurate. Yes, I'm being pedantic, but this might be worth mentioning in explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.122.60|162.158.122.60]] 16:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Chris Long&lt;br /&gt;
==Comic changed==&lt;br /&gt;
The comic shown here is not the same as the comic currently shown at xkcd.com. The current image has &amp;quot;A 'this' that holds 'this'&amp;quot; as the label in the upper left. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162455</id>
		<title>Talk:2043: Boathouses and Houseboats</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2043:_Boathouses_and_Houseboats&amp;diff=162455"/>
				<updated>2018-09-07T16:53:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The state of California already believes that a house held by a car is a housecar:&lt;br /&gt;
:Vehicle Code - VEH&lt;br /&gt;
:DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED [100 - 681]  ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3. )&lt;br /&gt;
:362.  &lt;br /&gt;
:A “house car” is a motor vehicle originally designed, or permanently altered, and equipped for human habitation, or to which a camper has been permanently attached. A motor vehicle to which a camper has been temporarily attached is not a house car except that, for the purposes of Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) and Division 12 (commencing with Section 24000), a motor vehicle equipped with a camper having an axle that is designed to support a portion of the weight of the camper unit shall be considered a three-axle house car regardless of the method of attachment or manner of registration. A house car shall not be deemed to be a motortruck.[http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&amp;amp;sectionNum=362.]&lt;br /&gt;
Bonus:  &amp;quot;motortruck&amp;quot; does indeed refer to a truck that holds a motor.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 15:57, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall did just correct the comic. The first version said &amp;quot;this [row] held by this [column]&amp;quot;, which would have meant, that e.g. a towtruck is a car held by a car, which is just wrong. It has just be updated to the correct &amp;quot;a this [column] that holds a this [row]&amp;quot;. I do not know how to change that here. Should be mentioned in Trivia [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your eagle eyes. I've uploaded the new version, please be patient until the cache is expired and you can see it. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Boat boat'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't a boat that holds another boat be some sort of either carrier, or at-sea repair dock?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sort of like a mothership, or a drydock?&lt;br /&gt;
Or an oil rig (technically considered a ship by international law), etc?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For that matter, how about the distinction between a boat and a ship?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 16:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:well... with the original version it fits. a boat held by another boat is a lifeboat. But the new version it doesnt. a boat that holds another boat would be, as you say, carrier, mothership, etc. looks like randall didn't think this through to the end... [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:40, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Floating Drydock? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_dock#Floating] {{unsigned|OldCorps}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're entirely correct on both counts. Lifeboats are carried by other boats, and ships that can carry other ships do exist. This comic also fails to distinguish between boats and ships, and cars, trucks, and trailers.&lt;br /&gt;
While a Boathouse is indeed a house for boats, a boat ''trailer'' is usually a trailer and not a car- the name already follows Randell's suggested logic: it's a trailer (characterized by lacking it's own engine, steering, and driver's cabin) that holds one or more boats. In addition, both tow trucks and car carriers are large enough to be properly referred to as trucks (the smallest type of tow truck I know of is built on a pickup truck chassis) and are fully capable to towing or carrying other trucks as well as cars, making the term carcar inaccurate. Yes, I'm being pedantic, but this might be worth mentioning in explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.122.60|162.158.122.60]] 16:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Chris Long&lt;br /&gt;
==Comic changed==&lt;br /&gt;
The comic shown here is not the same as the comic currently shown at xkcd.com. The current image has &amp;quot;A 'this' held by a 'this'&amp;quot; as the label in the upper left. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 16:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2022:_Sports_Champions&amp;diff=160348</id>
		<title>2022: Sports Champions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2022:_Sports_Champions&amp;diff=160348"/>
				<updated>2018-07-21T14:31:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */  fixed wiki links to remove apostrophes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 20, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Sports Champions&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = sports_champions.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = For a long time, people thought maybe Usain Bolt was the one for running, until the 2090s and the incredible dominance of Derek Legs.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a HARRY &amp;quot;INCOMPLETE&amp;quot; EXPLANATION - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of {{w|nominative determinism}}, the comic lists people whose surname relates to their participation in various sports. It is presented as though it was created in the far future, reflecting on champions over the decades through to the 2080s. The first three are real sportspeople, the remainder are imaginary players of the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The caricatures are participating in their sport, except for Jebediah who is standing at a {{w|lectern}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;width:20%&amp;quot;|Name&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;width:10%&amp;quot;|Years&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;width:15%&amp;quot;|Sport&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;width:55%&amp;quot;|Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Margaret Court&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|Tennis&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Margaret Court}} is a Australian tennis player, former world number 1, who won many competitions in the 1960s and 70s. A {{w|tennis court|tennis '''court'''}} is the playing arena used in that sport.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gary Player&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|Golf&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Gary Player}} is a South African golfer who won nine major championships in the 1960s and 70s. Game competitors are often known as '''player'''s, for example, the golf tournament {{w|The Players Championship}}.  {{w|Hubie Green}}'s name relates even more directly to the game of golf.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lonzo Ball&lt;br /&gt;
|2020s&lt;br /&gt;
|Basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Lonzo Ball}} is an American professional basketball player, currently with the Los Angeles Lakers. The 2020s decade listed is a projection of when he would likely become his most dominant in the sport, as he began playing professionally in 2017. Of course, basketball is a {{w|ball game|'''ball''' game}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jake Halfpipe&lt;br /&gt;
|2030s&lt;br /&gt;
|Skateboarding&lt;br /&gt;
|A '''{{w|half-pipe|halfpipe}}''' is a structure used in extreme sports such as skateboarding and snowboarding.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarah Goggles&lt;br /&gt;
|2030s&lt;br /&gt;
|Swimming&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{w|Goggles}}''' are protective eyewear used in many sports, such as swimming or skiing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kevin Slurve&lt;br /&gt;
|2050s&lt;br /&gt;
|Baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|A '''{{w|slurve}}''' is a baseball throwing technique, a portmanteau of '''sl'''ider and c'''urve'''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Julia Chairlift&lt;br /&gt;
|2050s&lt;br /&gt;
|Skiing&lt;br /&gt;
|A '''{{w|chairlift}}''' is an aerial machine often used to transport winter sports participants up mountains.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Dwight Shuttlecock&lt;br /&gt;
|2060s&lt;br /&gt;
|Badminton&lt;br /&gt;
|A '''{{w|shuttlecock}}''' is a projectile used in the sport of badminton.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Brandon Sponsorship&lt;br /&gt;
|2060s&lt;br /&gt;
|Unclear&lt;br /&gt;
|Sporting professionals are often {{w|Sponsor (commercial)|sponsored}} by corporations. Brandon is holding a pair of shoes, which are probably a branded '''sponsorship''' item.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kate Dopingscandal&lt;br /&gt;
|2070s&lt;br /&gt;
|Cycling&lt;br /&gt;
|There have been many '''{{w|Doping in sport|doping scandal}}s''' in the world of sport,  notably cyclist {{w|Lance Armstrong}}, and {{w|Doping in Russia|many Russian competitors}} in the Olympics&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jebediah Disasterous Postgame-PressConference&lt;br /&gt;
|2080s&lt;br /&gt;
|Unspecified&lt;br /&gt;
|At the end of sporting events - ie post-game - there is often a {{w|News conference|press conference}} where the competitors discuss the result. Sometimes, these live interviews are a disaster. Randall has chosen to spell his name as &amp;quot;Disasterous&amp;quot;, rather than the more conventional &amp;quot;Disastrous&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|(in title text)&lt;br /&gt;
Usain Bolt and Derek Legs&lt;br /&gt;
|2090s&lt;br /&gt;
|Sprinting&lt;br /&gt;
|From the title text, {{w|Usain Bolt}} is the (now retired) world record holder for the 100 meter dash and 4×100 meter relay events in {{w|Track &amp;amp; Field}}. Thus Randall considers him a solid contender for this list since he can '''bolt''' down the track. However the fictional Derek '''Legs''' ends up replacing Bolt on the list, either because they are an even faster sprinter, or because “legs” more clearly and unambiguously relates to running than “bolt” does.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two rows of people wielding sports equipment are shown, six in the upper row, five in the lower, only the last has no equipment but is standing behind a lectern with a microphone attached to it. Below each person, their name is given and the decade in which they were champions of their sport is given below their name, in brackets. Here is a list of the 11 people:]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Woman with dark hair holding a tennis racket]&lt;br /&gt;
:Margaret Court&lt;br /&gt;
:(1960s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball with a golf club]&lt;br /&gt;
:Gary Player&lt;br /&gt;
:(1970s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball with a basketball]&lt;br /&gt;
:Lonzo Ball&lt;br /&gt;
:(2020s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy on a skateboard]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jake Halfpipe&lt;br /&gt;
:(2030s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Woman with dark hair wearing a swim cap and goggles]&lt;br /&gt;
:Sarah Goggles&lt;br /&gt;
:(2030s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A man with a baseball cap throwing a baseball to the right]&lt;br /&gt;
:Kevin Slurve&lt;br /&gt;
:(2050s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A woman with long black hair in a knit cap and wearing ski googles is standing on skis holding ski poles]&lt;br /&gt;
:Julia Chairlift&lt;br /&gt;
:(2050s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy holding a badminton racket bouncing a shuttlecock on it]&lt;br /&gt;
:Dwight Shuttlecock&lt;br /&gt;
:(2060s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy holding a pair of shoes in his hand]&lt;br /&gt;
:Brandon Sponsorship&lt;br /&gt;
:(2060s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairbun standing next to a bicycle.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Kate Dopingscandal&lt;br /&gt;
:(2070s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy standing behind a lectern with a microphone on it.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Jebediah Disasterous Postgame PressConference&lt;br /&gt;
:(2080s)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fun fact: Every sport eventually produces a champion competitor named after a common element of the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairbun]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sport]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Baseball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Basketball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2012:_Thorough_Analysis&amp;diff=159386</id>
		<title>Talk:2012: Thorough Analysis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2012:_Thorough_Analysis&amp;diff=159386"/>
				<updated>2018-06-27T19:47:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started the explanation. Things that need investigation: Is this an actual scientific paper somewhere? Can anyone find the original source? If not, perhaps still based on real events? [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 18:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The earthquake was a real event: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/events/1811-1812newmadrid/summary.php &amp;amp; https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-great-midwest-earthquake-of-1811-46342/ (this one mentions the church bells) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.130|162.158.63.130]] 18:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)david0mp&lt;br /&gt;
::A quick search of Google scholar doesn't turn up anything close to this paper. Tried various combinations of New Madrid Earthquake, Bell, Church, etc. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 19:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe its ‘cause I’m dumb, but I originally interpreted the caption as meaning that these papers investigated minor details *about* the thoroughness of the 9/11 commission’s report.  As in, the 9/11 commission mentioned this bell tower somewhere, and this report is debunking it.  The explanation on here should probably make clear what the intended meaning is. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.47.162|172.68.47.162]] 19:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like this paper covers the earthquake and church bells (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2000JB900110), but the church bell mentioned is in Georgia and not South Carolina.  Close enough I guess? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.10|172.68.54.10]] 19:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2009:_Hertzsprung-Russell_Diagram&amp;diff=159022</id>
		<title>2009: Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2009:_Hertzsprung-Russell_Diagram&amp;diff=159022"/>
				<updated>2018-06-20T15:48:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 20, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = hertzsprung_russell_diagram.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram is located in its own lower right corner, unless you're viewing it on an unusually big screen.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created ON AN UNUSUALLY LARGE SCREEN - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The {{w|Hertzsprung–Russell diagram}} is a scatterplot showing absolute luminosities of stars against its effective temperature or color. It's generally used to understand a star's age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The axes are labeled in {{w|Kelvin}} (degrees {{w|Celsius}} above {{w|absolute zero}}) and, in a reversal of regular Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams, {{w|Watts}}. The Watt is a unit of {{w|power}}, but is frequently used as indicator of luminosity due to its use in {{w|incandescent light bulbs}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regular Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams start at about 1000K (for context, a light bulb usually glows at about 3000K) and what is labeled on this diagram as 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; watts&amp;amp;mdash;i.e. the upper-left corner. The diagram has been expanded to zero on both axes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2009:_Hertzsprung-Russell_Diagram&amp;diff=159021</id>
		<title>Talk:2009: Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2009:_Hertzsprung-Russell_Diagram&amp;diff=159021"/>
				<updated>2018-06-20T15:47:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cgrimes85: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How the heck is a lava cake more luminous than a campfire? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.28}}&lt;br /&gt;
:It's Lava Lake, as in a large puddle of lava.[[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 15:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it's a logarithmic scale, is it more correct to say the plot been expanded to 1 on both axes? [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 15:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cgrimes85</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>