<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Chrullrich</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Chrullrich"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Chrullrich"/>
		<updated>2026-05-15T07:24:01Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3204:_Dinosaurs_And_Non-Dinosaurs&amp;diff=406045</id>
		<title>Talk:3204: Dinosaurs And Non-Dinosaurs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3204:_Dinosaurs_And_Non-Dinosaurs&amp;diff=406045"/>
				<updated>2026-02-12T10:57:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think that's a stork.  My guess would be that it's a heron.&lt;br /&gt;
The bird in the lower right also looks like some sort of shorebird, but I've got no clue. {{unsigned ip|99.26.146.61|19:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I changed egret to heron.  If there is some distinguishing feature in the outline that makes it clear that this an egret, as compared to the more general heron, please document (either in explanation or comments). [[Special:Contributions/107.77.205.200|107.77.205.200]] 19:02, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel like this comic should be in the explanation https://xkcd.com/1211/ [[Special:Contributions/2600:4041:2E5:B900:66D3:74AD:D92D:356B|2600:4041:2E5:B900:66D3:74AD:D92D:356B]] 20:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could it have a brief layman's explanation of how/why the top right *aren't* dinosaurs? Y'know beyond just &amp;quot;well, technically...&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/91.84.189.119|91.84.189.119]] 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They are not dinosaurs because dinosaurs are only a subgroup of prehistoric animals living on land. Others are flying or underwater reptiles (don’t know the real names of those), or just plain reptiles who have existed (as a group) for far longer. Dinos are technically named „land reptiles“, but are not reptiles. It’s a bit confusing and this is where my half knowledge ends [[Special:Contributions/2A00:1E:82C2:D401:F4A3:23F3:8A2D:63B1|2A00:1E:82C2:D401:F4A3:23F3:8A2D:63B1]] 09:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Saying “dinosaurs are not reptiles” isn’t true, but more importantly is a strange thing to say in a scientific context. If you are using “reptile” informally, then the definition of one is fuzzy anyways. If using it cladistically, then reptile pretty much means “sauropsid” which includes dinosaurs and thus birds, which  are not informally/traditionally included, so you might as well use the less ambiguous term “sauropsid”. [[User:Terdragontra|Terdragontra]] ([[User talk:Terdragontra|talk]]) 15:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, the common definition of reptiles doesn't match a single evolutionary group, as crocodiles are more closely related to dinosaurs, and thus birds, than they are to lizards.  Turtles separated  earlier, so are equally related to both of those groups.  To answer the original point, dinosaurs are defined as all the animals descended from a certain common ancestor, which they only relatively recently realized includes birds, and not just some long extinct animals known only from fossils.  There are aome other animals also known only from fossils in the same time period that the general public often mistakenly thinks are dinosaurs, but are not closely related to them, being closer to other groups of living animals.--[[Special:Contributions/2600:100A:B12D:723E:FCD9:2B70:1145:6A44|2600:100A:B12D:723E:FCD9:2B70:1145:6A44]] 07:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did anyone else think that &amp;quot;Pseudo-such&amp;quot; things were a made up thing for staplers? [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 13:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’m interested at the things somewhere on the boundaries. Some basal forms are sometimes included as dinosaurs and sometimes just outside the clade. And som nonbird dinosaurs are somewhat birdlike, and shoebills feel more dinosaury than the average bird (while hummingbirds feel less so). [[User:Terdragontra|Terdragontra]] ([[User talk:Terdragontra|talk]]) 15:48, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The bird which feels the most dinosaury to me is definitely the cassowary. I think Randall could have included it in the top-left quadrant. [[User:Martin|Martin]] ([[User talk:Martin|talk]]) 22:11, 8 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What bird is in the lower right of the Are dinosuars, but don't seem like dinousaurs box? Currently the explanation says &amp;quot;falcon&amp;quot; - not clear why somebody thought it was a falcon. Whatever ID we give, should have some explanation. The wings look not as long front to back as a falcon.  It also lacks a falcons spread tail (which can be tucked in or course).  Also lacks the hooked beak typical of a falcon.  &lt;br /&gt;
The long narrow wings suggest a relatively long distance flyer. It lacks the split tail typical of a swallow or swift. The beak isn't long enough for an albatross or similar.  Gulls typically have bigger beak and rounded head. A {{w|petrel}} is my current best guess.  A tern, shearwater or skua also seem possible. [[Special:Contributions/107.77.205.200|107.77.205.200]] 19:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would have gone with describing it as a generic gull. Which would be wrong, in its own way, but at least not as wrong as 'seagull' ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The short neck is falcony though.  I just googled &amp;quot;birds of prey silhouettes&amp;quot; and falcon looks very plausible to me. [[User:Martin|Martin]] ([[User talk:Martin|talk]]) 22:16, 8 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a claim bicycles are not living creatures, but I think we may need a citation. Policeman MacCruiskeen. [[Special:Contributions/80.41.29.9|80.41.29.9]] 14:54, 8 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Continuing with the profile pedantry, in the objects which are neither dinosaurs nor look like dinosaurs, that is definitely not a pineapple. Pineapple leaves do not have a central stem, but rather all originate from the top of the pineapple. It more closely resembles a bonsai pine tree in a pot. {{unsigned ip|1.141.51.6|06:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
: It's a toilet brush put away the wrong way up. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe it is indeed a pineapple, but rather stylized. I searched up a large selection of silhouette and line-drawings of pineapples, and many of them looked much like this example. Randall may have cribbed a bit from the existing corpus of work, rather than a real-life fruit? I don't know. A pineapple seems like the zany kind of object that would land in one of these round-ups, rather than a bonsai or toilet-brush, don't you think? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 09:23, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd say an upside-down toilet brush is a lot zanier than a pineapple. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 16:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is basically just one big set-up for Randall's amusement that a stapler looks a bit like a crocodile, isn't it?[[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:29, 9 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds legit...especially as I first thought it WERE a crocodile :-) {{unsigned ip|2a02:2455:1960:4000:9da4:59d7:1b5a:dcc3|12:37, 9 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The squirrel and stapler in the bottom right square reminded me of Squirrel Stapler lol [[User:Amateurautist|Amateurautist]] ([[User talk:Amateurautist|talk]]) 16:25, 9 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pot plant?&amp;quot; We can't see it well enough to be that specific, though I think it is shaped differently than a pot plant. &amp;quot;Potted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, I saw a pineapple, not a pot(ted) plant. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FB91:5103:C3E:1873:B450:305A:44C9|2607:FB91:5103:C3E:1873:B450:305A:44C9]] 18:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In some parts of the English speaking world they call plants in pots &amp;quot;a pot plant&amp;quot; rather than using the term to refer to the reefer.[[Special:Contributions/57.140.28.52|57.140.28.52]] 17:42, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we are going to be pedantic, the flightless bird silhouette is of a false penguin, not a penguin, although admittedly today people call false penguins “penguins” because all the true penguins were exterminated about 180 years ago. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 04:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've linked to ''{{w|Jurassic Park}}'' as one of Randall's favorite films, but since it was first a most excellent Crichton novel, and then an entire media franchise, isn't it fair to say that Randall is a fan of the whole thing, rather than just the one film? Do we have an actual citation where he mentions it? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 09:20, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think the category titles in the description should say &amp;quot;creatures&amp;quot;.  Nothing in the comic specifically claims these are groups of creatures, and the items in Quadrant IV include a bicycle, a stapler, and a plant or pineapple, which are clearly not creatures. [[Special:Contributions/136.226.19.189|136.226.19.189]] 17:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you'd kindly consult a dictionary, you would see that this definition of &amp;quot;creature&amp;quot; is perfectly normal and understandable. While Randall doesn't use it directly, it may be too archaic for the audience here to understand. I wouldn't oppose changing our wording, but I just wanted to point out that it is, pedantically correct usage after all. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 00:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I highly doubt that his intention was an ''archaic'' definition that has fallen out of favor. The more correct term in the present day would be &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;creature&amp;quot;. I say that we change it to objects. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:58, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I object. &amp;quot;Objects&amp;quot; objectively gives a sense of &amp;quot;non-creature&amp;quot;, so &amp;quot;object&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;creature&amp;quot; would project a reach in itself.&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's 16 (or 17) drawings of truly &amp;quot;creatures&amp;quot;, and 2 (or 3) drawings of truly &amp;quot;objects&amp;quot;, depending upon what the maybe-pineapple is and whether you want to class the person by one of the words or not. Either of those words is going to be awkward (one less overhelmingly than the other), and neither is really the kind of common-parlance hypernym that wouldn't go without complaint. You need something like &amp;quot;entities&amp;quot;, really.&lt;br /&gt;
:::So... we could always go for the even more descriptive (and suitably inclusive, in-context) &amp;quot;''silhouettes'' that [don't] seem like dinosaurs&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;are [not]&amp;quot;? Even Cueball is a silhouette of a regular (circle-outline for head) Cueball. As a suggestion. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 01:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So Linnaeus had information animal, vegetable, and mineral? [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 10:57, 12 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1052:_Every_Major%27s_Terrible&amp;diff=352319</id>
		<title>Talk:1052: Every Major's Terrible</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1052:_Every_Major%27s_Terrible&amp;diff=352319"/>
				<updated>2024-10-08T11:31:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The video link 404's - here is a working archive link: [https://web.archive.org/web/20190610190844/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhaEjgnmy3c https://web.archive.org/web/20190610190844/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhaEjgnmy3c] --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.82|172.68.174.82]] 17:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Iambic Octameter has a ''stressed-unstressed'' pattern, not the other way around as this explanation says. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.4|172.68.34.4]] 02:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, the explanation is correct, I misread the Wikipedia article. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.4|172.68.34.4]] 13:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 1's cueball is in the same pose as Rodin's &amp;quot;The Thinker&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 4 background is the periodic table of elements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 5, Fowler's Toad emits a noxious secretion that irritates skin and mucous membranes (it was previously thought to cause warts)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 6, Psychology = a serial killer with a chainsaw, Sociology = hobo; Social Psych = hobo serial killer with chainsaw.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 15, LISP, Scheme, and other computer languages with an excess of parentheses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 16, biohazard symbol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 19, bongos were played by Richard Feynman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 27, fear of snakes, study of reptiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 28, a picture of a stomach, pun on &amp;quot;stomach&amp;quot; being slang for &amp;quot;tolerate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 30, words in all lowercase like e.e.cummings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[Special:Contributions/75.103.23.206| 75.103.23.206 ]]  22:04, 7 December 2012‎&lt;br /&gt;
:Hobo serial killer with chainsaw? Social psych sounds awesome!&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Special:Contributions/24.2.217.188|24.2.217.188]] 22:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
In panel 22 (History), what's the theme connecting the years 1935, 1969, and 1991?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Wwoods|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods|talk]]) 15:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:1935 is certainly related to some event that lead to the WWII (a quick look at the Wikipedia page for 1935 show that was the year Hitler rearmed Germany), which paved the way to the Cold War. 1969 was Apollo 11, a high moment of the Cold War, as the USA essentially won the race to the Moon. And 1991 was the year that the USSR dissolved, officially ending the Cold War. [[User:Sir labreck|Sir labreck]] ([[User talk:Sir labreck|talk]]) 18:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:1935, Harlem race riot; 1969, race riot in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 1991, Rodney King race riots... 2014-2016??? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.62|173.245.54.62]] 03:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Although the race riot dates match, I think war related is more likely.  1935 (WWII), 1969 (Vietnam), 1991 (Gulf War) I'm not sure what the common thread is, though, and 'war' is too broad [[Special:Contributions/172.69.250.4|172.69.250.4]] 20:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::{{w|WWII}} began in '''1939'''. The {{w|Vietnam War}} was 1955-1975 and {{w|Gulf_War_(disambiguation)|Gulf War}} is ambiguous. Just sayin... --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:28 March 1935: Near Roswell, New Mexico, Robert H. Goddard successfully launched the first gyroscopically-stabilized liquid-fueled rocket. 1969, Apollo 11. 1991, ?. The only somewhat significant events I could find are the 5th Spacelab mission and the launch of the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. Also, 1991 was the first year with ''less'' than 100 orbital launches since 1962. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 11:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This explanation is very small for that big comic. I am starting to add the transcript and after that I will do more investigations to that opera. This should be the key to explain all the panels.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The answer won't lie in the song, trust me. Pirates of Penzance is probably my favorite comic opera out there. Plus Randall gives that the lie in saying you can use the tune from the elements song (a well-known parody) or even Marry Poppins (similar tune, but not exactly the same). I think each panel is just a reference to the words, I don't think that Randall is actually involving The Pirates of Penzance in any way other than the tune. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.211|173.245.52.211]] 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Feynman was also known for being a ladies' man, so the two girls in panel 19 are significant IMHO.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.117|141.101.80.117]] 13:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Needs explanation what does it mean to '''choose a major''', and what '''major''' is in this context.  Note every reader is from U.S.A.; different countries have different higher education systems. --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 10:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:True that. 'Graduation' in Brazil means 'Undergraduation' in the US. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.105|108.162.254.105]] 03:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Math's just physics unconstrained by precepts of reality&amp;quot; - that isn't a binary tree, its a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifurcation_diagram bifurcation diagram] from chaos theory.  And, sorry, it has nothing to do with the Banach–Tarski paradox - that's just mindless name-dropping.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Davidbak|Davidbak]] ([[User talk:Davidbak|talk]]) 20:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you sure it is not just an illustration of Banach-Tarski, arguably the most  famous example where mathematical reality and (physical) intuition diverge? Why would the verse be illustrated by a bifurcation diagram (which I think, and I might be a bit ignorant here, is a concept pretty much only found in the &amp;quot;applied side&amp;quot; of mathematics, which ''is'' constrained by precepts of reality)? And even if it were a bifurcation diagram, why would the mass of the balls change? (again, I am perhaps showcasing my ignorance; if so, please be gentle) Finally, i would deem the bifurcation explanation a bit too obscure to be the real deal - a panel which is only understood by somewhat specialized mathematicians seems strange to me, especially given that all other frames contain understandable references. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.183|108.162.229.183]] 13:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRexBMPeRTo[[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is distinctly a bifurcation diagram. Banach Tarski doesn't factor into this at all. Disagree-P 15:39, 20 Nov, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 30: possibly iambic septameter[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.154|141.101.104.154]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the reason for not getting hugs in panel 16 is more to do with the fact that as a virus researcher you would be aware of how easy it is to get a virus/disease and so you would keep away from people and be worried about hugs because of that. (Sorry if I've done something wrong this is my first comment!) [[User:Yxquillio|Yxquillio]] ([[User talk:Yxquillio|talk]]) 08:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another song I guess could provide a good match is &amp;quot;Can You Stop the Calvary?&amp;quot; by Jona Lewie (or &amp;quot;Where's the Modding API&amp;quot; if you're a YOGSCAST fan like me. :)) --[[User:JayRulesXKCD|JayRulesXKCD]] ([[User talk:JayRulesXKCD|talk]]) 11:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;End of the first verse where Cueball tells his academic advisor that he is undecided as every major's terrible. He even throws away his study guide.&amp;quot;  Are you sure it's not a course catalog? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.59|108.162.212.59]] 10:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I should add that Pratchett used that quote to prove that geography was not a boring science, as it is physics, which is exciting, with some trees on it. Just a thought.[[User:MrBookBoy|MrBookBoy]] ([[User talk:MrBookBoy|talk]]) 01:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, the cs parens are missing a close paren. Like literally. Lol. [[User:Sarah the Pie(yes, the food)|Sarah the Pie(yes, the food)]] ([[User talk:Sarah the Pie(yes, the food)|talk]]) 15:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that in panel 35, they're referring to &amp;quot;Sophie's Choice.&amp;quot; A movie in which the protagonist has to decide which of her two children to save, and which one to kill.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.245|108.162.245.245]] 16:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;Undecided&amp;quot; related to the alignment chart? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.154.228|172.71.154.228]] 22:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Panel 31.  While epidemiology may well involve the study of causes and trends and whatnot, so does history.  Epidemiology is the study of diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing for panel 14 is wrong. You can't use that argument to argue for the existence of a greatest possible vacuum cleaner or greatest possible pizza because those things imply limitations like limited size, limited age, able to be broken (for the pizza), etc. If it didn't have these or any limitations it wouldn't be a vacuum cleaner/pizza; it would just be God. &amp;quot;basically, if your pizza gets infinitely great it will turn into God&amp;quot; - [https://www.youtube.com/@redeemedzoomer6053 Redeemed Zoomer] [[Special:Contributions/172.70.211.130|172.70.211.130]] 03:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200632</id>
		<title>2377: xkcd Phone 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200632"/>
				<updated>2020-10-27T01:37:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ Title text.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2377&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = xkcd Phone 12&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = xkcd_phone_12.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = New phone OS features: Infinite customization (home screen icons no longer snap to grid), dark mode (disables screen), screaming mode (self-explanatory), and coherent ultracapacitor-pumped emission (please let us know what this setting does; we've been afraid to try it).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a PERSON NAMED MAX. Features need more explanation, and MOUSEOVER TEXT needs to be explained. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the &amp;quot;12th&amp;quot; in the ongoing xkcd Phone series in which Randall explains his new joke phone designs with many strange and useless features. It is also a reference to the recently released {{w|iPhone 12}}. However, there have only been 9 comics released, with the previous two being [[2000: xkcd Phone 2000]] and [[1889: xkcd Phone 6]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note about the xkcd Phone 12 and the xkcd Phone 12 Max (only for people named Max) is a joke about the different models of iPhone 12: iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max. The xkcd Phone 12 Max would be expected to have a larger screen, but it seems that this phone is also only for people with the name Max.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Full drivetrain warranty''' - A common warranty feature for automobiles--see {{w|drivetrain}}. As a side note, the phone here would be cheaping out on the warranty if it were a car; a &amp;quot;drivetrain&amp;quot; warranty covers everything ''except'' the engine; only if it was a &amp;quot;{{w|powertrain}}&amp;quot; warranty would it cover the engine. A phone typically has none of these things, although this one seemingly does.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Coated for easy swallowing''' - A common feature on solid medicines meant to be taken orally.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Surgical-grade apps''' - &amp;quot;Surgical-grade steel&amp;quot; is sometime used as a selling point indicating quality materials.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Built-in 600 lb magnet for magnet fishing''' - {{w|Magnet fishing}} is an activity for searching for objects that can be pulled in by a strong magnet. This would make a phone weigh over 600 lbs, which would be heavy for a phone.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Oral-B partnership: hold phone against teeth to ultrasonically remove plaque''' - This is a reference to {{w|ultrasonic toothbrush}}es. {{w|Oral-B}} does not produce any ultrasonic toothbrushes, but does produce ''{{w|sonic toothbrush}}es.''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''40 mL emergency water supply''' - Many phones are now water-resistant to some degree; this phone ships with water included.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Security feature: unmarked side buttons'''&lt;br /&gt;
* '''3,000,000-volt arc allows wireless charging from a range of up to 36 inches''' - Possibly from a Tesla coil.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''99.9% BPA- and hands- free''' - {{w|Bisphenol A}} (or BPA) is a compound that is used in making plastics. BPA has been found to exhibit hormone-like properties, so there is a movement to produce BPA-free plastics using alternative bisphenols. {{w|Hands-free}} describes using the device &amp;quot;without hands&amp;quot;, e.g. using voice commands. This is important when using a device while driving. These are 2 unrelated ideas, but both have the suffix -free.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Extended release charge cable''' - Electronics manufacturers support standards to reduce time to fully recharge, e.g. Qualcomm {{w|Quick Charge}} standard. This is a reference to &amp;quot;extended release&amp;quot; medication. It's unclear what purpose would be served by charging a phone slower than normal.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Closed timelike curves''' - Given that {{w|Closed timelike curves}} are usually associated with solutions to general relativity that allow for time travel...&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Fits in standard shipping container''' - An {{w|intermodal shipping container}} is large enough to fit vehicles, raising the question of just how big this XKCD phone is.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Interlocking, stackable''' - A quality of, among other things, LEGO bricks. Probably a bad idea to use this feature, given how close the phone is to critical mass.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Nintendo partnership: GameBoy Printer compatibility''' - The {{w|Game Boy Printer}} was a thermal paper printer originally paired with the Game Boy Camera. This device was released in 1998 and discontinued in 2003, so this partnership would be obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sustain pedal''' - A {{w|sustain pedal}} is commonly associated with a digital keyboard or piano, it lets the note continue sounding when the key is released. It's unclear what purpose it would serve in a phone.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''CDC partnership: when in an indoor space with too many people, phone begins playing &amp;quot;We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)&amp;quot; at slowly increasing volume until everyone leaves''' - An allusion to the COVID-19 pandemic. {{w|We Like to Party! (Vengaboys song)|&amp;quot;We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)&amp;quot;}} is a 1998 Eurodance/techno hit by the Vengaboys, and is perhaps most familiar to Americans from a series of Six Flags ads.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sacrificial anode''' - Useful if something metal (like, say, a boat) will be in a wet environment for a long time. The {{w|sacrificial anode}} is made of a material with higher redox potential (typically zinc), and will corrode faster than the (more valuable) metal object it's attached to. It's unclear if the phone HAS a sacrificial anode or IS a sacrificial anode.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tactical helium reserve''' - since 1925, the United States has had a {{w|National Helium Reserve|strategic helium reserve}} - helium is very rare on earth and has important scientific and military uses, so it’s important to have aside just in case. But here we have a tactical helium reserve - which suggests it's smaller and focused on shorter term goals. Compare {{w|strategic bombing}} focused on destroying entire cities or countries and {{w|tactical bombing}} aimed at destroying individual targets or military units.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''50% below critical mass (2x safety factor)''' - Indicates the phone contains fissile material. This &amp;quot;2x safety factor&amp;quot; means that if you put 2 phones next to each other, or put one phone next to a {{w|neutron reflector}}, you would have a {{w|criticality accident}}, which may explain why you would not own another phone after this one.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Shake for factory reset''' - A {{w|factory reset}} is often possible on electronic devices, and is usually accomplished either by pressing a button or closing an electrical bridge. This one works like an Etch-a-Sketch. This would not be preferred, as slight disturbances could easily cause massive losses of data.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Norton MacAfee protection: if you're ever attacked by John MacAfee, Peter Norton will come out of retirement to defend you'''. {{w|Norton (software)|Norton}} and {{w|MacAfee}} are competing software security companies. This &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; combines the two of them and claims that Norton (the person) will defend you if MacAfee (the person) attacks you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text continues the list of features with similarly useless or disturbing items. App icons on modern phones are arranged in a grid pattern for easy selection. Abandoning the grid would allow icons to overlap, making it very difficult to locate and select the partially obscured ones. A &amp;quot;dark mode&amp;quot; (or night mode) replaces bright colors with darker shades to be less distracting at night and to protect the user's night vision, such as while driving. Turning the screen off entirely makes it very dark, but also useless. The &amp;quot;coherent ultracapacitor-pumped emission&amp;quot; sounds like the phone can produce a powerful laser beam (or similar), which could be used as a weapon. However, as the user must presumably touch the phone's screen to activate it, and also look at the screen to select the desired option, they would likely be the first victim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Full drivetrain warranty&lt;br /&gt;
* Coated for easy swallowing&lt;br /&gt;
* Surgical-grade apps&lt;br /&gt;
* Built-in 600 lb magnet for magnet fishing&lt;br /&gt;
* Oral-B partnership: hold phone against teeth to ultrasonically remove plaque&lt;br /&gt;
* 40 mL emergency water supply&lt;br /&gt;
* Security feature: unmarked side buttons&lt;br /&gt;
* 3,000,000-volt arc allows wireless charging from a range of up to 36 inches&lt;br /&gt;
* 99.9% BPA- and hands- free&lt;br /&gt;
* Extended release charge cable&lt;br /&gt;
* Closed timelike curves&lt;br /&gt;
* Fits in standard shipping container&lt;br /&gt;
* Interlocking, stackable&lt;br /&gt;
* Nintendo partnership: GameBoy Printer compatibility&lt;br /&gt;
* Sustain Pedal&lt;br /&gt;
* CDC partnership: when in an indoor space with too many people, phone begins playing &amp;quot;We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)&amp;quot; at slowly increasing volume until everyone leaves&lt;br /&gt;
* Sacrificial anode&lt;br /&gt;
* Tactical helium reserve&lt;br /&gt;
* 50% below critical mass (2x safety factor)&lt;br /&gt;
* Shake for factory reset&lt;br /&gt;
* Norton MacAfee protection: if you're ever attacked by John MacAfee, Peter Norton will come out of retirement to defend you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The xkcd Phone 12* and 12 Max**&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*Standard&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;  **For people named Max&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The only phone you'll ever own&amp;quot;®™&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd Phones]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics sharing name|xkcd Phones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2351:_Standard_Model_Changes&amp;diff=196539</id>
		<title>2351: Standard Model Changes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2351:_Standard_Model_Changes&amp;diff=196539"/>
				<updated>2020-08-28T11:45:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: Dark matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2351&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Standard Model Changes&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = standard_model_changes.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Bugs are spin 1/2 particles, unless it's particularly windy.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by VIN DIESEL. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic strip, Randall is proposing some changes to the {{w|Standard Model}} of particle physics. The currently accepted particle table has 17 slots: 12 fermions (first 3 columns of the table - six quarks [top two rows] and six leptons [bottom two rows]) and five bosons (last two columns of the table - four gauge bosons [left hand column] and one scalar boson [right hand column]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1024px-Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg.png|500px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic consists of a normal version of the particle table to which Randall has made substantial alternations and additions, which are drawn in red over the black and white table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Standard Model's predictions are very well supported by experiments, the physics community has identified several flaws in it (e.g. it lacks any particles to convey gravity), and so lots of research is committed to searching for &amp;quot;{{w|Physics beyond the Standard Model}}&amp;quot;.  Some of Randall's changes are sort of intended to fill some of those gaps, but for the most part they are nonsensical (although not quite as much as the [[2301: Turtle Sandwich Standard Model|Turtle Sandwich Standard Model]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quarks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall's proposed changes to the quarks are relatively restrained -- he proposes only that the &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;charm&amp;quot; names should be moved to bosons, while the strange quark should be renamed the &amp;quot;right quark&amp;quot; and the charm quark should be renamed the &amp;quot;left quark&amp;quot;, so that all quarks will have &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; directional names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the original quark model proposed by Murray Gell-Mann included only three quarks, with the &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot; quark so named because the particles that contained them were ''strangely'' long-lived relative to their masses.  The &amp;quot;charm&amp;quot; quark was so named when it was proposed because it brought a &amp;quot;charming&amp;quot; symmetry to the weak interaction, which we now understand is because it completes the second generation of quarks, along with the strange quark.  When a third generation of quarks was proposed, they were called top and bottom by analogy to the up and down quarks (which are so named because of the spin they carry), though the names 'truth' and 'beauty' were briefly in competition, and colliders working with B quarks are sometimes even now called '{{w|B-factory|Beauty Factories}}'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's strange that Randall assigns the &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; direction to the charm quark and the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; direction to the strange quark, when many languages, including English, have {{w|Bias_against_left-handed_people#Language|negative connotations attached to words associated with the left direction}}, and positive connotations attached to words associated with the right direction (e.g. &amp;quot;sinister&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;dexterous&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Leptons ===&lt;br /&gt;
While Randall leaves two leptons, the electron and the muon, untouched, he has opted to discard the tau lepton entirely. Each of these three leptons has an associated neutrino; Randall has decided to discard all but the electron neutrino, as he has decided that three are too many neutrino types. He has also replaced the standard symbol for the neutrino, the Greek letter ν (nu), with a capital N, in order to avoid confusion between ν and v, the two letters appearing similar, though in some circumstances this might further be confused with excited nucleon states (heavier versions of protons and neutrons, which are given the symbol N, followed by the mass in parenthesis&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pdglive.lbl.gov/ParticleGroup.action?init=0&amp;amp;node=BXXX005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) or possibly even with the symbol for Nitrogen (the atomic nucleus with 7 protons and a similar number of neutrons, encountered more in radiology/chemistry as an N, &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;N, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;14&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;N, N&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and other variations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In place of one of the neutrinos, Randall has introduced a new elementary particle that supposedly explains the existence of dark matter. The nature of dark matter is one of the most famous mysteries in physics: galaxies seem to have much higher gravity than their detectable matter would account for, yet this mysterious form of matter does not seem to interact with other matter in any detectable way. Neutrinos are known for rarely interacting with other matter, due to their lack of charge, which could justify Randall's decision, but even the little interaction that neutrinos have with the weak force rules them out as candidates for dark matter.  Hypothetical {{w|sterile neutrino}}s could be the source of dark matter, and also for the small but nonzero masses of the familiar neutrinos, but no such particles have yet been identified. Together with the arrow, the only one in the comic that points at the particle's ''box'' rather than the symbol, the triumphant exclamation &amp;quot;We found it!&amp;quot; probably means that the new &amp;quot;dark matter&amp;quot; entry in the table ''is'' the dark matter particle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bosons ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall proposes several new names for existing particles.  First, that the {{w|W and Z bosons}} should be renamed to the charm and strange bosons, respectively (taking the names from the quarks), and second, that the {{w|Higgs boson}} should be named the {{w|Vin Diesel}} boson, as he considers {{w|Peter Higgs}}'s name to be too boring to be given to a particle.  The Higgs boson is known in the popular press (to the chagrin of many physicists, including Higgs) as &amp;quot;{{w|The God Particle (book)|The God Particle}}&amp;quot;, which is certainly a flashy name, but which itself was changed by the editors of the book of the same name from its authors' originally-intended title: The ''Goddamn'' Particle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall inserts the graviton, a purely theoretical particle, noting that its inclusion is &amp;quot;probably fine&amp;quot;. While the graviton has never been observed, it is occasionally included in diagrams of the standard model to show its hypothetical place, which likely convinced Randall to do the same. Here it is shown below the Higgs boson, implying to be a scalar boson, though it is theoretically a 2nd-order tensor boson (with a spin of 2) and is usually given its own column.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall also proposes that a false decoy &amp;quot;Magic&amp;quot; particle should be added to the Standard Model, to trip up promoters of {{w|quantum mysticism}}.  Presumably, anyone who invokes this particle to support their claims will expose themselves as a fraud, much as cartographers will print {{w|trap street}}s on their maps to catch plagiarism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text references {{w|Spin (physics)|quantum spin number}}, a property of particles in physics that bears similarities to actual spinning. Although the &amp;quot;cool bugs&amp;quot; particle is put in the {{w|scalar boson}} group with spin 0, Randall states that it instead has spin 1/2, like a fermion. In fact, all known fermions have spin 1/2. It is thus not clear whether the &amp;quot;cool bugs&amp;quot; particle obeys the {{w|Pauli exclusion principle}} or not. The joke comes from Randall treating quantum spin as actual spin and introduces wind blowing the &amp;quot;cool bugs&amp;quot; particle around as if they were made of actual bugs, which they are not{{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Particle !! Symbol !! Actual particle !! Actual symbol !! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Up quark || u || {{w|Up quark}} || u || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Left quark || l || {{w|Charm quark}} || c || Randall is continuing the pattern of naming quarks after directions. This wouldn't work well with [[474: Turn-On]] unfortunately. The charm quark was named due to bringing a &amp;quot;charming symmetry&amp;quot; to the weak interaction, completing the second generation of quarks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Top quark || t || {{w|Top quark}} || t || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Gluon || g || {{w|Gluon}} || g || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Vin Diesel boson || V || {{w|Higgs boson}} || H || {{w|Peter Higgs}} is a British theoretical physicist who predicted the existence of scalar bosons, particles with spin 0. Randall suggests that the Higgs boson needs a flashier name and proposes to rechristen it the &amp;quot;Vin Diesel boson&amp;quot;, named after American actor {{w|Vin Diesel|Mark Sinclair}}, who has nothing to do with physics.{{Citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Down quark || d || {{w|Down quark}} || d || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Right quark || r || {{w|Strange quark}} || s || Randall is suggesting this name to match the charm (now left) quark. Particles containing this quark were considered &amp;quot;strangely long-lived&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Bottom quark || b || {{w|Bottom quark}} || b || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Photon || γ || {{w|Photon}} || γ || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Graviton}} || G || {{w|Graviton}} (Hypothetical) || G || The graviton is a hypothetical particle which mediates the force of {{w|gravity}}. Randall is taking a very breezy point of view, stating that it would probably be fine to include it, even though its existence has not been confirmed yet. It is not recommended to act this way, though many do.{{Citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Electron || e || {{w|Electron}} || e || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Muon || µ || {{w|Muon}} || µ || No change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| (none) || (none) || {{w|Tau (particle)|Tau lepton}} || τ || The tau lepton is a lepton with average lifetime much shorter than the electron or the muon. Randall apparently considers this particle redundant and states &amp;quot;No one needs tau leptons&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Strange boson || s || {{w|Z boson}} || Z || The Z boson is one of two particles (three, counting the W boson's different charges) that mediate the {{w|weak force}}, named for having '''z'''ero charge. Randall suggests the strange quark's name would be better suited for this particle.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Magic || M || (none) || (none) || Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false.{{Citation needed}} He suggests this particle as a decoy to trip up {{w|quantum mysticism}} promoters, possibly because [[1528: Vodka|he has been possessed]] by [[Black Hat]] and is [[356: Nerd Sniping|trying to run them over with a truck]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Electron neutrino || N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; || {{w|Electron neutrino}} || ν&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; || Randall is annoyed by the similarity of the Greek lowercase nu (ν) and the lowercase V (v). Interestingly Randall leaves the &amp;quot;electron&amp;quot; part of its name in even though he has eliminated the other neutrinos.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| (none) || (none) || {{w|Muon neutrino}} || ν&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;µ&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; || Randall thinks one neutrino is enough, and to be honest, who can argue with him?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Dark matter}} || D || {{w|Tau neutrino}} || ν&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;τ&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; || Dark matter is thought to make up most of the universe's matter. Randall claims to have found it; replacing the tau neutrino with it. This could easily be the most abundant particle in the universe.{{Citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Charm boson || c || {{w|W boson}} || W || The other mediator of the '''w'''eak force. Randall is suggesting that it would suit the charm name more than the charm quark.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cool bugs || 🐞 || (none) || (none) || Randall has decreed that extremely small bugs are fundamental particles. Bugs in reality are several orders of magnitude larger than any of the other known particles.{{Citation needed}} They would not make a good elementary particle{{Citation needed}} for a number of extremely obvious reasons{{Citation needed}} and would make physics pretty frightening to some people.{{Citation needed}} With the exception of mosquitoes as they can be considered elementary particles. {{Citation needed}}  Randall uses the insect emoji as the symbol of the cool bugs particle.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
[A chart of the Standard Model of particle physics with red marks all over the chart.]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Changes I would make to the Standard Model&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[In reading order:]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
u up, connected to the down quark below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
c charm, connected to the strange quark below, in faded gray with a red l left written over it. Above is a red note with an arrow pointing to the charm quark. The note reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Consistent quark names (use &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;charm&amp;quot; for bosons)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
t top, connected to the bottom quark below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
g gluon&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
H Higgs, in faded gray with a red V Vin Diesel writted over it. To the right is a red note with an arrow pointing to the Higgs boson, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With all respect to Peter H, the Higgs boson needs a flashier name&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
d down, connected to the up quark above.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
s strange, connected to the charm quark above, in faded gray with a red r right written over it.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
b bottom, connected to the top quark above.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
γ photon&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
G graviton, in red with a red border. To the right is a red note with an arrow pointing to the graviton, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let's just include it, it's probably fine&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
e electron, connected to the electron neutrino below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
µ muon, connected in faded gray to the muon neutrino below, with red rounded corners cutting it off.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
τ tau, connected to the tau neutrino below, in faded gray with a red scribble over it. On the tau lepton is a red note which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No one needs tau leptons&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Z Z boson, with the Z symbol and the Z in the name in faded gray. The symbol has a red s written over it and the Z in the name is scribbled out in red. The word strange is written in red between the symbol and the name.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
M magic, in red with a red border. To the right is a red note with an arrow pointing to the magic particle, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Decoy particle for people making nonsense claims about &amp;quot;quantum&amp;quot; philosophy stuff&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
v e electron neutrino, with the e as a subscript of the v, connected to the electron above. The v is in faded gray and a red N with a circle around it is written on it. Below is a red note with an arrow pointing to the electron neutrino, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fix neutrino symbol so I stop mixing up ν and v&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
v μ muon neutrino, with the µ as a subscript of the v, connected to the muon above, in faded gray with a red scribble over it. On the muon neutrino is a red note which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Too many neutrinos&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
v τ tau neutrino, with the τ as a subscript of the v, connected to the tau lepton above, in faded gray. Written over it is a D dark matter in red with a red border. Below the tau neutrino is a red note with an arrow pointing to it, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We found it!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
W W boson, with the W symbol and the W in the name in faded gray. The symbol has a red c written over it and the W in the name is scribbled out in red. The word charm is written in red between the symbol and the name.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
🐞 cool bugs, in red with a red border. To the right is a red note with an arrow pointing to cool bugs, which reads,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Very small bugs are fundamental particles now&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2349:_Rabbit_Introduction&amp;diff=196268</id>
		<title>Talk:2349: Rabbit Introduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2349:_Rabbit_Introduction&amp;diff=196268"/>
				<updated>2020-08-21T07:53:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Comic posted shortly after this made national news in the USA:&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.newsweek.com/why-hundreds-millions-genetically-engineered-mosquitoes-will-soon-released-florida-1526375&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.56|172.69.34.56]] 05:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic was posted incredibly early compared to the other recent comics [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.232|172.69.34.232]] 07:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah wtf it's so early [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.25|172.69.33.25]] 07:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a twitter thread at @xkcd, one word every few days, from 2020-05-15 until 2020-06-01, reading &amp;quot;How's it going I saw a small bun (picture)&amp;quot;, continuing the sentence until 2020-06-25, &amp;quot;and an airplane crossing the moon (picture)&amp;quot; [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 07:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193492</id>
		<title>2320: Millennium Problems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193492"/>
				<updated>2020-06-16T05:56:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2320&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 15, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Millennium Problems&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = millennium_problems.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The hard part about opening a hole in the proof of the Poincaré conjecture is that Grigori Perelman will come out of retirement to try to fix it by drawing a loop around the hole and contracting it to a point.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an ISOMORPHIC HODGE. Needs expert attention on Hodge, Yang-Mills, and Birch/SD.  Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is presenting a slide on the {{w|Millennium Prize Problems}}, seven problems designated by the Clay Mathematics Institute in the year 2000 as some of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics, a sort of successor to David Hilbert's {{w|Hilbert's problems|list of 23 problems}} announced in 1900.  The seven problems are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|P versus NP problem}}, the problem of whether or not a problem whose solutions can be verified in polynomial time must necessarily have a method for producing a solution in polynomial time.  This is thought not to be the case, i.e. &amp;quot;P != NP&amp;quot;, but is not proven (nor mentioned on Cueball's slide).&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Hodge conjecture}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, which asserts that the 3-sphere (the &amp;quot;surface&amp;quot; of a four-dimensional ball) is the only closed and simply-connected (i.e. no holes) 3-dimensional space.  It was solved in 2003 by {{w|Grigori Perelman}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Riemann hypothesis}}, which asserts that all non-trivial zeroes of the {{w|Riemann zeta function}} have real part one-half.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Yang–Mills existence and mass gap}}, the problem of why the color force is conveyed by massless gluons but only observed in massive particles.  This one is not mentioned on Cueball's slide.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness}} problem, which questions whether or not there must be a solution to the {{w|Navier-Stokes equations}} (the laws of fluid motion) for any smooth set of initial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture}}, abbreviated &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot; here, which asserts that there is a simple way to tell the number of rational solutions to an elliptic curve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are $1,000,000 prizes attached to each problem, although {{w|Grigori Perelman}}, the mathematician who proved the {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, has turned down his prize. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is attempting to demonstrate relationships between the various problems. According to the presentation, proving one might either disprove or prove others, and the proposed interactions between problems are so complex that the Institute might decide to award an additional prize to whomever can figure out which problem or problems have actually been solved by any given proof.  This eighth prize could perhaps be funded by the award Perelman rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball has previously been [[:Category:Banned from conferences|banned from conferences]] for various provocative acts; presumably he's on his way to getting thrown out of this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions that, if someone were to find a hole (a common expression for a deficiency or error) in Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture, the famously reclusive author might show up again and fix the problem by applying theoretical math to the (real-world) figurative &amp;quot;hole&amp;quot;, by enclosing it in a loop (a term used in a number of mathematical fields) and then &amp;quot;shrinking&amp;quot; the loop to a dimensionless point, forcing the hole closed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball is presenting in front of a projector screen.  Ponytail is watching him, and another Cueball is looking off-panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[The slide on the projector screen shows a four-by-four matrix with illegible entries, connected by lines to the words &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot;.  The phrase &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; is written at the bottom of the slide.  &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; are connected by an illegible equation, and arrows point from &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot;, and from &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: ...Proving that one of these four is unsolvable, but ''not'' which.  If it's one of ''these'', it would open a hole in Perlman's Poincaré conjecture proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: But it would ''also'' mean that solving either of the other two would ''re''-prove Poincaré, and imply Hodge is isomorphic to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Cueball: ''Security?!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caption below panel: I'm trying to make it so the Clay Mathematics Institute has to offer an eighth prize to whoever figures out who their other prizes should go to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Banned from conferences]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193491</id>
		<title>2320: Millennium Problems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193491"/>
				<updated>2020-06-16T05:55:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2320&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 15, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Millennium Problems&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = millennium_problems.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The hard part about opening a hole in the proof of the Poincaré conjecture is that Grigori Perelman will come out of retirement to try to fix it by drawing a loop around the hole and contracting it to a point.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an ISOMORPHIC HODGE. Needs expert attention on Hodge, Yang-Mills, and Birch/SD.  Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is presenting a slide on the {{w|Millennium Prize Problems}}, seven problems designated by the Clay Mathematics Institute in the year 2000 as some of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics, a sort of successor to David Hilbert's {{w|Hilbert's problems|list of 23 problems}} announced in 1900.  The seven problems are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|P versus NP problem}}, the problem of whether or not a problem whose solutions can be verified in polynomial time must necessarily have a method for producing a solution in polynomial time.  This is thought not to be the case, i.e. &amp;quot;P != NP&amp;quot;, but is not proven (nor mentioned on Cueball's slide).&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Hodge conjecture}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, which asserts that the 3-sphere (the &amp;quot;surface&amp;quot; of a four-dimensional ball) is the only closed and simply-connected (i.e. no holes) 3-dimensional space.  It was solved in 2003 by {{w|Grigori Perelman}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Riemann hypothesis}}, which asserts that all non-trivial zeroes of the {{w|Riemann zeta function}} have real part one-half.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Yang–Mills existence and mass gap}}, the problem of why the color force is conveyed by massless gluons but only observed in massive particles.  This one is not mentioned on Cueball's slide.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness}} problem, which questions whether or not there must be a solution to the {{w|Navier-Stokes equations}} (the laws of fluid motion) for any smooth set of initial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture}}, abbreviated &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot; here, which asserts that there is a simple way to tell the number of rational solutions to an elliptic curve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are $1,000,000 prizes attached to each problem, although {{w|Grigori Perelman}}, the mathematician who proved the {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, has turned down his prize. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is attempting to demonstrate relationships between the various problems. According to the presentation, proving one might either disprove or prove others, and the proposed interactions between problems are so complex that the Institute might decide to award an additional prize to whomever can figure out which problem or problems have actually been solved by any given proof.  This eighth prize could perhaps be funded by the award Perelman rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball has previously been [[:Category:Banned from conferences|banned from conferences]] for various provocative acts; presumably he's on his way to getting thrown out of this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions that, if someone were to find a hole (a common expression for a deficiency or error) in Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture, the famously reclusive author might show up again and fix the problem by applying theoretical math to the (real-world) figurative &amp;quot;hole&amp;quot;, by enclosing it in a loop (a term used in a number of mathematical fields) and then &amp;quot;shrinking&amp;quot; the loop to a dimensionless point and thus forcing the hole closed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball is presenting in front of a projector screen.  Ponytail is watching him, and another Cueball is looking off-panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[The slide on the projector screen shows a four-by-four matrix with illegible entries, connected by lines to the words &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot;.  The phrase &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; is written at the bottom of the slide.  &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; are connected by an illegible equation, and arrows point from &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot;, and from &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: ...Proving that one of these four is unsolvable, but ''not'' which.  If it's one of ''these'', it would open a hole in Perlman's Poincaré conjecture proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: But it would ''also'' mean that solving either of the other two would ''re''-prove Poincaré, and imply Hodge is isomorphic to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Cueball: ''Security?!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caption below panel: I'm trying to make it so the Clay Mathematics Institute has to offer an eighth prize to whoever figures out who their other prizes should go to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Banned from conferences]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193490</id>
		<title>2320: Millennium Problems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2320:_Millennium_Problems&amp;diff=193490"/>
				<updated>2020-06-16T05:50:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2320&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 15, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Millennium Problems&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = millennium_problems.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The hard part about opening a hole in the proof of the Poincaré conjecture is that Grigori Perelman will come out of retirement to try to fix it by drawing a loop around the hole and contracting it to a point.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by an ISOMORPHIC HODGE. Needs expert attention on Hodge, Yang-Mills, and Birch/SD.  Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is presenting a slide on the {{w|Millennium Prize Problems}}, seven problems designated by the Clay Mathematics Institute in the year 2000 as some of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics, a sort of successor to David Hilbert's {{w|Hilbert's problems|list of 23 problems}} announced in 1900.  The seven problems are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|P versus NP problem}}, the problem of whether or not a problem whose solutions can be verified in polynomial time must necessarily have a method for producing a solution in polynomial time.  This is thought not to be the case, i.e. &amp;quot;P != NP&amp;quot;, but is not proven (nor mentioned on Cueball's slide).&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Hodge conjecture}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, which asserts that the 3-sphere (the &amp;quot;surface&amp;quot; of a four-dimensional ball) is the only closed and simply-connected (i.e. no holes) 3-dimensional space.  It was solved in 2003 by {{w|Grigori Perelman}}.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Riemann hypothesis}}, which asserts that all non-trivial zeroes of the {{w|Riemann zeta function}} have real part one-half.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Yang–Mills existence and mass gap}}, the problem of why the color force is conveyed by massless gluons but only observed in massive particles.  This one is not mentioned on Cueball's slide.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness}} problem, which questions whether or not there must be a solution to the {{w|Navier-Stokes equations}} (the laws of fluid motion) for any smooth set of initial conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture}}, abbreviated &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot; here, which asserts that there is a simple way to tell the number of rational solutions to an elliptic curve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are $1,000,000 prizes attached to each problem, although {{w|Grigori Perelman}}, the mathematician who proved the {{w|Poincaré conjecture}}, has turned down his prize. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is attempting to demonstrate relationships between the various problems. According to the presentation, proving one might either disprove or prove others, and the proposed interactions between problems are so complex that the Institute might decide to award an additional prize to whomever can figure out which problem or problems have actually been solved by any given proof.  This eighth prize could perhaps be funded by the award Perelman rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball has previously been [[:Category:Banned from conferences|banned from conferences]] for various provocative acts; presumably he's on his way to getting thrown out of this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball is presenting in front of a projector screen.  Ponytail is watching him, and another Cueball is looking off-panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[The slide on the projector screen shows a four-by-four matrix with illegible entries, connected by lines to the words &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Birch/SD&amp;quot;.  The phrase &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; is written at the bottom of the slide.  &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; are connected by an illegible equation, and arrows point from &amp;quot;Riemann&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Hodge&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot;, from &amp;quot;Birch-SD&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot;, and from &amp;quot;Poincaré ''wrong??''&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Navier-Stokes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: ...Proving that one of these four is unsolvable, but ''not'' which.  If it's one of ''these'', it would open a hole in Perlman's Poincaré conjecture proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: But it would ''also'' mean that solving either of the other two would ''re''-prove Poincaré, and imply Hodge is isomorphic to...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Cueball: ''Security?!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caption below panel: I'm trying to make it so the Clay Mathematics Institute has to offer an eighth prize to whoever figures out who their other prizes should go to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Banned from conferences]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2261:_Worst_Thing_That_Could_Happen&amp;diff=186767</id>
		<title>2261: Worst Thing That Could Happen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2261:_Worst_Thing_That_Could_Happen&amp;diff=186767"/>
				<updated>2020-01-31T15:25:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* List of worst thing */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2261&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 29, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Worst Thing That Could Happen&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = worst_thing_that_could_happen.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Before I install any patch, I always open the patch notes and Ctrl-F for 'supervolcano', 'seagull', and 'garbage disposal', just to be safe.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by A SLOW NUCLEAR WAR WAGED BY SEAGULLS WITH HANDGUNS. Link to related comics could be included. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ponytail]] and company are considering upgrading some part or program of their computers.  They may feel the need to upgrade because the software they are currently using has some vulnerability that is only patched in newer revisions (this comic was released just two weeks after the end of extended support for Windows 7), or because they want to have access to some new feature.  As part of the decision-making process, Ponytail asks her friends, &amp;quot;What's the worst that could happen?&amp;quot;  If the computers they are discussing are privately owned, she may be concerned about losing personal data or having to learn new software interfaces.  On the other hand, if they are discussing a corporate computer system, there may also be business-related risks.  If their company relies on functionality offered by their current system that has been deprecated or modified in the updated version (such as in [[1172: Workflow]], or as with many specialized tools or machines in the real world), they may suffer downtime while they modify the rest of their workflow.  Even if the upgraded system &amp;quot;should&amp;quot; continue to fit their needs, they may need to take some downtime to perform the update and deal with the risks of something going badly along the way, and there may be major costs associated with license subscriptions and support contracts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, Ponytail's friends answer with their ideas for the worst things that could happen ''ever'', not &amp;quot;...as a result of the upgrade&amp;quot;, as Ponytail meant. The result is a list of 'worst things' ridiculously unconnected to a computer upgrade. At the end [[Megan]], however, interprets these as possible results of the upgrade, and advises against upgrading. A [[#List of worst thing|list with explanations]] can be found below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, Ponytail could be facepalming at the fact that the worst thing which could happen, according to her team, is that they are put on a ridiculous game show in which, if they answer a question incorrectly, they are chucked in garbage disposal. This may be bad, but it is nowhere near as bad as an erupting supervolcano or nuclear war.  However, [[Cueball]] has shown anxiety and difficulties in social situations, such as the less-than-helpful advice in &amp;quot;[[1917: How to Make Friends]]&amp;quot;, so he (and likewise [[Hairy]] and Megan) may consider that embarrassment on the game show is worse than instantaneous death in a nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text talks about searching upgrade release notes for some of the things listed to be sure none are potential side effects of an upgrade. &amp;quot;Ctrl-F&amp;quot; is a common keyboard shortcut for &amp;quot;find text string&amp;quot; in many programs. Since Randall is just reading but not changing the patch notes, a web browser, PDF viewer, or word processing program such as Adobe Reader or Microsoft Word might have been used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===List of worst thing===&lt;br /&gt;
*The list of &amp;quot;worst things that could happen&amp;quot; discussed by the team are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border =1 width=100% cellpadding=5 class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Thing''' || '''Notes'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Supervolcano}} || A supervolcano is a volcano which would (or does) eject over 1,000 cubic kilometers of material when it erupts.  The United States in particular is home to a supervolcano in {{w|Yellowstone National Park}}.  When it erupts, the results will be catastrophic to the entire world, possibly triggering a volcanic winter, massive crop die-offs (and subsequent cascading extinctions up the food chain), and the destruction of human civilization.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Robot uprising}} || An artificial intelligence overthrows humanity and takes over the world. Hairy is probably concerned with a violent uprising in which the robots are determined to exterminate humanity, as in, for example, the {{w|Terminator (franchise)|''Terminator''}} films, rather than [[1450: AI-Box Experiment|an AI who just wants to stay in a box]].  Randall has written about robot uprisings (both violent and humorous) in [[:Category:Artificial Intelligence|several comic strips]].  If Ponytail's company is involved in artificial intelligence, a robot uprising could be a remotely plausible worst-case scenario from a botched upgrade.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Everyone falls down a {{w|well}} at once || ''{{w|Lassie}}'' was a series of books, films, and television shows about Lassie, a heroic Rough Collie dog who either rescues people from dangerous situations or at least goes to find other humans and lead them to the victim.  The archetypal rescue in popular culture is that {{tvtropes|TimmyInAWell|little Timmy, her owner, falls down a well}} (although this never happened in any episode -- it was her first owner, Jeff Miller, who needed rescuing from the well, while Timmy got into pretty much every ''other'' kind of trouble imaginable).  There have also been several well-publicized incidents in which a real person fell down a well, such as [https://www.biography.com/personality/baby-jessica Baby Jessica] and [https://www.michigan.gov/egle/0,9429,7-135-3313_3675_3689-7996--,00.html this list]. If ''everyone'' fell down a well at once, there would be nobody for Lassie to summon to get them out, which would be a pretty bad thing.  It's unclear how this upgrade could cause this outcome, making this suggestion preposterous.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Instead of hitting the tallest thing around, lightning starts hitting the nicest || {{w|Lightning}} generally strikes the tallest object under a thunderstorm, a topic addressed in {{what if|16|''What-if #16: Lightning''}}. {{w|Lightning rods}} are built to take advantage of this effect to protect nearby important objects from the lightning.  If lightning started hitting the ''nicest'' thing around, then it would presumably strike whatever it was that the lightning rods are meant to protect (nice buildings, nice people, [https://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-7-3.html nice rockets]).  If the computer that's being upgraded is connected to the [[1620: Christmas Settings|Universe Control Panel]], this change could be a plausible negative consequence of the update.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Seagulls}} all get {{w|handguns}} || Guns in the hands of humans account for the large majority of homicides and suicides in the USA.  Letting handguns be wielded by seagulls, which lack the impulse control and cognitive thinking required to make the ownership of a handgun somewhat safe, would make this much worse.  Seagulls are not particularly known for their intelligence, self control, or kindness toward others. At popular beaches, seagulls are known to aggressively harass humans for their food; if they wielded handguns, a great deal of violence would ensue.  Even if mayhem and death were not due to intentional use (i.e., if the seagulls were capable of learning that use of a handgun would get them food or something else they might like), they would happen from accidental use.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|A really '''slow''' nuclear war || No {{w|nuclear war}} involving two sides launching nuclear weapons at each other has ever been fought, but experts generally agree that an all-out nuclear war between superpowers would end very quickly and very badly for all parties involved (as well as all parties not involved).  A &amp;quot;slow&amp;quot; nuclear war might play out as a series of tit-for-tat individual launches rather than an apocalyptic exchange, but the destruction of cities and release of fallout would be the same.  Perhaps the anticipation of when exactly it's &amp;quot;your turn&amp;quot; to be a target would make the slow war a worse experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the computer networking technology used today has its roots in research into hardening nuclear command and control systems against an incoming first strike, and many works of fiction have depicted nuclear war (or the risk of nuclear war) resulting from computer and software errors in systems that are supposed to &amp;quot;upgrade&amp;quot; the decision-making process, such as ''{{w|WarGames}}''.  If Ponytail's company is involved in the defense industry, a nuclear war could be a plausible worst-case scenario from a botched upgrade.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|We have to go on a game show where they show you photos of people you've met once and ask you their names, and if you get one wrong a trapdoor opens and you fall into a garbage disposal || The premise of this game show seems to play on Munroe's frequent references to anxiety about social situations. For people who have troubling remembering names, encountering someone you've met once before can be harrowing, as you may know that you ''should'' know their name, but be unable to recall it, creating embarrassment and awkwardness (particularly if the person remembers your name with ease).  The concept is that fear could be exploited in the form of a game show. Many popular game shows feature contests where contestants who fail are subjected to pain and/or humiliation, such as the ''{{w|Ninja Warrior}}'' franchise. This case is particularly exaggerated, as the inability to remember even a single name would result in being dropped into a garbage disposal, which would virtually guarantee serious maiming and/or death. The reaction of the strip characters suggests that they all share a lack of confidence in their ability to remember the names of casual acquaintances, making such a game show one of the &amp;quot;worst things&amp;quot; they could encounter. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail is standing in front of a desk with a computer. One of her hands is on the keyboard. Behind her, Cueball, Hairy, and Megan are looking at the computer screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: We should upgrade.  What's the worst that could happen?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Supervolcano.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: Robot uprising.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Everyone falls down a well at once.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on Cueball, Hairy, and Megan. Cueball has turned toward the other two.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Instead of hitting the tallest thing around, lightning starts hitting the nicest.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Seagulls all get handguns.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: A really '''''slow''''' nuclear war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Large panel with the original setting. Ponytail has turned towards the other three but is now facepalming, as Cueball gesturing with his hands at chest-height are still looking at the other two facing him.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: We all have to go on a game show where they show you photos of people you've met once and ask you their names, and if you get one wrong a trapdoor opens and you fall into a garbage disposal.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: '''Ooh,''' that's a good one.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Yeah, let's put off the upgrade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Volcanoes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Robots]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Weather]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nuclear weapons]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2180:_Spreadsheets&amp;diff=177077</id>
		<title>2180: Spreadsheets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2180:_Spreadsheets&amp;diff=177077"/>
				<updated>2019-07-25T07:37:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2180&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 24, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Spreadsheets&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = spreadsheets.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = My brother once asked me if there was a function to produce a calendar grid from a list of dates in Google Sheets. I replied with a single-cell formula that took in a list of dates and outputted a calendar. It used SEQUENCE(), REGEXMATCH(), and a double-nested ARRAYFORMULA(), and it locked up the browser for 15 seconds every time it ran. I think he learned a lot about asking me things.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a REGEXREPLACE(). Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball is doing some task on his computer, with a {{w|Shoulder angel|angel and devil on both sides of him}}, trying to influence his work. The angel is telling him to do things the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; way, while the devil is telling him to do his work using a {{w|spreadsheet}}, which is considered to be a shortcut or a hack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is not clear from the cartoon that this is meant, the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; alternative to using a spreadsheet for some task usually involves a database.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The punch line comes when the angel becomes so intrigued by the functions that can be accomplished by spreadsheets, Google Sheets in particular, that it gives up trying to dissuade Cueball, and asks for more information from the devil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Randall mentions a time when he created a calendar grid in Google Sheets using a list of dates. This is described as being done in a &amp;quot;single-cell formula&amp;quot;, and taking a long time to run. This shows the power and complexity of spreadsheets, scaring his brother from asking him any further computing questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All functions mentioned in this comic can be found in {{w|Google Sheets}}, but similar functions can be found in most modern spreadsheet applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
REGEXREPLACE(text, regular_expression, replacement)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARRAYFORMULA(array_formula)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
QUERY(data, query, [headers])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMPORTHTML(url, query, index)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SEQUENCE(rows, columns, start, step)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
REGEXMATCH(text, regular_expression)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball is at his computer. In the air on either side of him are an angel version of Cueball, with a halo and wings, and a devil version of Cueball, with horns and a pitchfork.]&lt;br /&gt;
[The angel's dialogue appears in regular print, while the devil's dialogue appears in white print in black speech balloons.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: Don't use a spreadsheet! Do it '''''right'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: But a spreadsheet would be so ''easy''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: In the long run you'll regret it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Closeup on Cueball, the angel, and the devil.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: Take the time to write ''real'' code.&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: Just paste the data! Tinker until it works!&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: Build a labyrinth of REGEXREPLACE() and ARRAYFORMULA()!&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: ''Feel the power!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Closeup on the devil.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel (off-panel): Fight the temptation!&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: Ever tried QUERY() in Google Sheets? It lets you treat a block of cells like a database and run SQL queries on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Another shot of Cueball at his computer with the angel and devil at either side.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: Don't listen to--&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: ... wait, really?&lt;br /&gt;
:Devil: Yes, and let me tell you about IMPORTHTML() ...&lt;br /&gt;
:Angel: ''Oooh...''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2169:_Predictive_Models&amp;diff=175979</id>
		<title>2169: Predictive Models</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2169:_Predictive_Models&amp;diff=175979"/>
				<updated>2019-06-30T03:17:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2169&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 28, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Predictive Models&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = predictive_models.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = WE WILL ARREST THE REVOLUTION MEMBERS [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING][tab] &amp;quot;Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a PREDICTIVE MODEL THAT WILL BE FIRST AGAINST THE WALL WHEN THE REVOLUTION COMES. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Predictive text}} is a feature on many systems where as you type the system automatically suggests likely words or phrases to follow what you have written to that point.  For instance, if you type &amp;quot;I'm heading&amp;quot; the system may suggest &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;back&amp;quot; as likely words to follow.  Predictive systems usually use prior input to generate their predictions, so if you frequently type &amp;quot;Totally amazing!&amp;quot; the system will suggest &amp;quot;amazing!&amp;quot; every time you type &amp;quot;totally&amp;quot; even if you actually want to type &amp;quot;totally true&amp;quot; sometimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, [[Cueball]] is using predictive text to uncover a plot against his organization/government, but instead of using only his personal input, the system is using input from ''all'' users.  By typing in an obscure phrase related to revolution and a meeting, he gets the predictive text algorithm to display where and when the next supposedly secret meeting will be held based on other users input.  This works because it is unlikely that anyone else other than revolutionaries would be typing this phrase, thus the only data the algorithm has to predict from is the actual message from the revolutionaries on their next meeting.  The caption of the comic is pointing out that systems which use prior input for predictive purposes in this way can end up leaking information that might otherwise be considered private.  (However, this method may produce outdated information.  On June 29, 2019, typing in Google &amp;quot;Long live the revolution. Our next meeting will be at&amp;quot; gave the predicted completion &amp;quot;long live the revolution. our next meeting will be at comic con 2018&amp;quot;, which would not be useful information to anyone looking for revolutionaries, because Comic-Con 2018 was already over.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As humanity adapts to a digital world, people are finding that their digital communications provide the illusion of confidentiality, with damaging results when the information leaks out.  Real-life examples include a [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-36391957 2016 British trainee doctor strike], where a technically-secure WhatsApp group leaked information to the press.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text shows the revolutionaries using the same technique.  By typing in &amp;quot;We will arrest the revolution members&amp;quot; they are hoping that the algorithm will suggest the time and date of their planned arrest, since no one other than the authorities would be typing in that phrase. Pressing the key [tab] to autocomplete that text produces &amp;quot;WE WILL ARREST THE REVOLUTION MEMBERS [AT THE JULY 28TH MEETING]&amp;quot;, and the revolutionaries then say &amp;quot;Cancel the meeting! Our cover is blown.&amp;quot; The revolutionaries have apparently made the serious mistake of holding secret meetings on regular, predictable dates (such as the 28th day of each month, the last date guaranteed to exist in any month of the Gregorian Calendar), and the authorities have successfully figured this out, either through the predictive-text attack or by other means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both examples assume that the revolutionaries and the authorities would be talking about very secret information in the clear on a network accessible to their adversaries.  In the real world people engaged in sensitive activities would communicate via code, encryption, or both, or would do so through secure channels.  There is still the danger of secret information leaking via non-secret channels, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the comic title is &amp;quot;Predictive Models&amp;quot;, the term {{w|Predictive modelling}} usually refers to computer programs that try to predict outcomes from data aggregation, such as reviewing health records to identify people most at risk from certain diseases based on weight, prior injuries, etc., before testing directly for the diseases themselves.  This is similar to but not precisely like the example in the comic, since predictive text is using direct input to predict further input, while predictive modelling is using related input (such as make and model of a car along with driver acceleration patterns) to predict a different output (such as likelihood of a crash).  Both predictive text and predictive modelling could leak information as the comic suggests, however.  A famous example occurred in World War II.  The Germans kept tank production figures a secret, but they gave items like engine blocks sequential serial numbers.  The Allies wanted to know exact tank production figures, so they solved the {{w|German tank problem}} by using statistical methods to analyze the distribution of these numbers on captured vehicles.  They were able to predict tank production figures extremely accurately, to the point they predicted 270 tanks in a month when 276 were actually built.  Thus the secret information on tank production leaked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Predictive text and the possibility to leak unintended information has been parodied on xkcd before in [[1068: Swiftkey]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Single panel with Cueball sitting at a desk typing on a laptop.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball typing: Long live the revolution. Our next meeting will be at&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; [Predictive text tool suggests in grey text] &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;the docks at midnight on June 28 [tab]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Aha, found them!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:When you train predictive models on input from your users, it can leak information in unexpected ways.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on a comic takes you to this page: [https://xkcd.com/%5BAT%2520THE%2520JULY%252028TH%2520MEETING%5D%5Btab%5D &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://xkcd.com/[AT%20THE%20JULY%2028TH%20MEETING][tab]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;], which as of this moment only shows &amp;quot;404 Not Found&amp;quot;. It is possible that [[Randall]] may add what he intends to add at a later date, most likely July 28, the date mentioned in the title text. The page will likely remain this way until then.&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2157:_Diploma_Legal_Notes&amp;diff=174773</id>
		<title>2157: Diploma Legal Notes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2157:_Diploma_Legal_Notes&amp;diff=174773"/>
				<updated>2019-05-31T16:49:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2157&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 31, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Diploma Legal Notes&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = diploma_legal_notes.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you're planning to challenge the royal family, you should probably wait 6-8 weeks, since a number of the younger ones have diplomas and Kate was actually on the varsity lightsaber team at St Andrews.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a CHALLENGER TO THE BRITISH THRONE. Each privilege, title text needs to be explained. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A class of 2019 graduate, presumably for some college or university, is given some rather odd privileges for graduating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common line in degree granting ceremonies is &amp;quot;the degree of X is conferred with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto.&amp;quot; This dates from the Roman Empire and continued through the rise of the university as an institution in medieval times. In the Roman era, the rights and privileges accorded to physicians and scholars included exemption from certain civic duties and military services, immunity from certain levies and from being summoned to court unduly, and even granting a state salary. In the medieval era, rights generally mirrored those of ecclesiastical figures and included immunity from civil law (instead scholars were subject to canon, or church law), as well as safe conduct on their travels between jurisdictions.  (See Scholarly Privileges, Their Roman Origins and Medieval Expression, Pearl Kibre, in the American Historical Review, Vol 59 No. 3 (April, 1954) at https://www.jstor.org/stable/1844716.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While true that some degrees do grant professional privileges today, generally additional accreditation beyond the degree is required (passing the bar, medical certification, etc.) to gain anything most people would consider a privilege or right or incur any obligation. (The obligation to pay your student loans back exists regardless of completing your degree).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* You may now legally perform marriages and arrest people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the jurisdiction, these may or may not be privileges that one already has by virtue of being in a particular jurisdiction or being part of a particular culture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cultures, a couple might be recognised as married if they meet certain conditions (as opposed to being legally recognised by a religious or civil authority), such as being recognised by the community or after the {{w|Inuit_women#Family_structure_and_marriage|birth of their first child}}. Because states often provide benefits (tax reductions, social services, etc) for being married, they often require that, in order to receive the benefits, that a marriage have a registered person recognise the marriage, which is likely the privilege that this graduating class' diploma is granting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common law jurisdictions, {{w|Citizen's arrest|citizen's arrest}} is legal without a warrant in some situations, although in many cases it is better to let a police officer arrest criminals due to potential legal issues that might arise. The privilege granted by graduating might grant or extend this privilege, depending on where the graduating class is located.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* If you have your diploma with you, you can use grocery store express lanes with any number of items.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* All graduates are entitled to delete one word of their choice from the Oxford English Dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* The university will mail you your working lightsaber within 6-8 weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* You can send mail without stamps.&lt;br /&gt;
The {{w|Franking#Franking_privilege|franking privilege}} allows sending mail without stamps and is often granted to legislators conducting &amp;quot;official business.&amp;quot; A group of legislators elected at the same time may sometimes be referred to as the &amp;quot;class of ''year''&amp;quot; such as [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/11/28/us/politics/congress-freshman-class.html &amp;quot;the congressional freshman class of 2019...&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* You have earned the right to challenge the British royal family to trial by combat. If you defeat them all, the throne is yours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* You may now ignore &amp;quot;Do Not Pet&amp;quot; warnings on airport security dogs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text builds on the items about lightsabers and the British royal family and advises that, because some of the royals are proficient with the weapon, it would be advisable to the newly graduated to hold off on the challenge until their own lightsaber arrives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[An official document with a title at the top between two images of graduation hats on either side:]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title:] CONGRATULATIONS, CLASS OF 2019!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your diploma grants you many new powers and privileges. These include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* You may now legally perform marriages and arrest people.&lt;br /&gt;
:* If you have your diploma with you, you can use grocery store express lanes with any number of items.&lt;br /&gt;
:* All graduates are entitled to delete one word of their choice from the Oxford English Dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;
:* The university will mail you your working lightsaber within 6-8 weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
:* You can send mail without stamps.&lt;br /&gt;
:* You have earned the right to challenge the British royal family to trial by combat. If you defeat them all, the throne is yours.&lt;br /&gt;
:* You may now ignore &amp;quot;Do Not Pet&amp;quot; warnings on airport security dogs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2150:_XKeyboarCD&amp;diff=174208</id>
		<title>2150: XKeyboarCD</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2150:_XKeyboarCD&amp;diff=174208"/>
				<updated>2019-05-17T06:55:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2150&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 15, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = XKeyboarCD&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = xkeyboarcd.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The key caps use LCD displays for all the vowels, so they can automatically adjust over the years to reflect ongoing vowel shifts while allowing you to keep typing phonetically.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a LEOPARD USING AN XKEYBOARCD. Seems to be finished, could someone check it again before deleting this tag? Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the same vein as the [[:Category:xkcd Phones|xkcd Phone series]], the XKeyboarCD seems to be an overly inventive and borderline ludicrous keyboard intended for some unknown audience. It has an assortment of features (some fairly normal, some more exotic) which give it a...&amp;quot;diverse skill set&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the second time that the &amp;quot;xkcd&amp;quot; has been used around a middle word, which uses some of the xkcd letters to form this word. The first was [[1506: xkcloud]] - XKC lou D, to spell ClouD with the C and D from XKCD, in that comic the letters where all lowercase. In this comic the Keyboard, has an X before the word and a C before the D with the xkcd letters capitalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''54 Configurable Rubik's Keys'''&lt;br /&gt;
The smaller cubes on a {{w|Rubik's cube}} resemble computer keys, so this feature makes fun of that by adding a spinnable Rubik's cube above the keyboard. The implication is that the keys would be 'configured' by solving the cube into the required state, although parity means that not all configurations could be reached by conventional means. To overcome this, the keys would need to be software-programmable, the equivalent of removing the stickers (or keycaps in this case), obviating the need to manipulate the cube as a twisty puzzle. Additionally, the rearmost keys would obviously be hard to see/reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hardcoded Plastic Keys for the 5 Most Useful Emoji'''&lt;br /&gt;
This feature parodies the feature of some laptop-keyboards where it is possible to dynamically assign emojis to a small touchscreen area. Which emojis would be &amp;quot;the most useful&amp;quot; is highly subjective. For example in the comic it shows the quite popular laughing with tears emoji, along with the octopus emoji and others. Notably, the &amp;quot;aerial tramway&amp;quot; was once the least-used emoji, and remains very rarely used.&lt;br /&gt;
The large size and central position of the keys make their usefulness even more questionable.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Emoji&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😰&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://emojipedia.org/face-with-open-mouth-and-cold-sweat/ Anxious Face With Sweat]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😂&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://emojipedia.org/face-with-tears-of-joy/ Face With Tears of Joy]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐙&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://emojipedia.org/octopus/ Octopus]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏇&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://emojipedia.org/horse-racing/ Horse Racing]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚡&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://emojipedia.org/aerial-tramway/ Aerial Tramway]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Serif Lock'''&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Serifs}} are small lines on the ends of certain characters in fonts such as Times New Roman and Georgia. It is dependent on the font, not on the key pressed; &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; is represented by the same code regardless of its font. Since a given font almost always either has or doesn't have serifs, this key seems challenging to implement. This key could be implemented, however, by simply changing between a pair of fonts when it is pressed. What's more, the button is placed roughly where left shift is on most keyboards, liable to cause frustration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Unlimited Key Travel'''&lt;br /&gt;
On a keyboard, key travel refers to the distance the key moves between its unpressed and pressed states. In reality, laptop keys only move a few millimeters before bottoming out, and conventional keyboards up to about a centimeter. An increased key travel may make typing more comfortable. However, the usefulness of having unlimited key travel is unclear, and the question of how this would be physically possible in the keyboard depicted remains unanswered. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Diagonal Spacebar'''&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of a wide key at the bottom that typists can hit easily with either thumb, we now have a tall, narrow key that requires being pressed with the right pinkie. This would not be a good change since most peoples' pinkies are their weakest finger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Arrow Key (Rotate to Adjust Direction)'''&lt;br /&gt;
Most computers have four {{w|arrow keys}}: up, left, right, and down. However, the XKeyboarCD just has one that can be rotated. This has the added bonus of allowing the arrow keys to point more than four different directions. While innovative, its utility is questionable given trackpoint devices which provide more intuitive joystick-like control. It also comes at the cost of compatibility with certain programs, such as older video games. It would also be awkward to operate as going from horizontally left to horizontally right, for example, would require the user to rotate the key first and then press it which wastes precious time when playing a video game. There is also the problem of allowing unlimited rotation, requiring the combination of a keyswitch and angle-selection mechanism (perhaps the keycap mounted on a long square rotatable rod, keying through dual opposing potentiometers and onto a conventional key switch). This would be mechanically complex which adds to the cost of the keyboard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 Puzzle-Style Numberpad'''&lt;br /&gt;
A {{w|15 puzzle}} is a square containing fifteen smaller squares and one blank spot, which allows the squares to be moved around. The squares are shuffled and then reassembled as a game or pastime, and are usually labelled 1-15 (as is the case here) or, when assembled properly, create a picture. A {{w|Numeric keypad|numberpad}} in this style would be frustrating to use for typing numbers, as they could shift (or be shifted) around, but could provide a fun feature to use as a game. How this would be used to generate numeric input is unclear, but the presence of 16 positions suggests {{w|hexadecimal}} input is possible. Keyboard keypads do have around 15 keys, but only 0-9 usually have numbers whereas the XKCD keypad has numbers 10-15 instead of the more conventional arithmetic operators, enter, and decimal point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ergonomic Design'''&lt;br /&gt;
The cylindrical portion of the keyboard is advertised as being an ergonomic design. Most ergonomic keyboards are both curved into a convex shape and split in the middle, with the blocks of keys on either side rotated around the vertical axis. This is done to follow natural arm and finger movements more closely, that is, avoid forcing the user to rotate their arms and hands to match the flat and rectangular key arrangement of a non-ergonomic keyboard. In contrast, the cylinder shape presented here is curved to make a ''concave'' shape which requires the user to lift and twist his arms to reach certain keys, which would be an even more strenuous motion than typing on a standard keyboard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some ergonomic keyboards come in unconventional form factors, such as vertical keyboards, to allow the user's hands to rest in more neutral positions or to change positions throughout the day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Title Text'''&lt;br /&gt;
The title text references sound changes in languages. Every language (and indeed, every dialect) routinely undergoes changes in its sounds and phonemes, in a mostly regular and systematic way. While not only vowels are affected, in languages with many vowels such as English, they're particularly likely to shift around and/or merge. While having dynamic keycaps that change can actually come in handy, the feature of only having vowels change in response to sound shifts is a bit less so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, while changes in how we pronounce words are always ongoing, the way we write words down tends to stay relatively static, and thahs wiy wuhd faynd thaet werds biykahm ihncaampriyhehnsihbuhl duw tuw now laanger biyihng spehlld aes they wer bihfaor. Second, English only uses five glyphs (aeiou) and a variety of methods to represent four times as many vowel sounds, so the software would need to have a way to handling that (in some dialects &amp;quot;bird&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;turn&amp;quot; for example, have the same vowel but are represented by &amp;quot;ir&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ur&amp;quot;). Third, vowel shifts are not ubiquitous: the {{w|Caught-cot merger}}, for example, is a phenomenon happening across some parts (but not all) of the US and UK. Therefore, while some people would say &amp;quot;caught&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;cot have the same vowel it should be spelled the same by the keyboard, but others would say they're two different vowels and should not be spelled identically. Fourth, sound shifts tend to occur over a relatively long period of time (in terms of human lifetimes), so a user would probably find the keycaps only change once or twice. All in all, this is not a very useful feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An alternative explanation is that the keys actually map to the {{w|International Phonetic Alphabet}} and converts what you type into English words (and the vowel changes). The IPA is an alphabet used in linguistics and language teaching, designed to represent every phoneme present in languages of the world unambiguously, with optional modifiers to indicate more subtle nuances in pronunciation, intonation and speech pathology. This alphabet consists of 107 letters and 56 modifiers (with some letters shared with the Latin and Greek alphabets), which would explain the large number of keys. In that case, the feature remains questionable since it only handles vowel shifts and not consonants, and anybody who'd use an IPA-keyboard would probably need to type out the phonology of other languages and appreciate not having to find a key has moved because English has undergone a vowel shift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Headings above a drawing of a very special keyboard:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Introducing the &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;XKeyboarCD&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:A keyboard for powerful users and their powerful fingers®&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The keyboard has many more keys than a usual Keyboard. Usual keyboards for stationary computers typically have a few of the rows with 21 keys, and then some with fewer. This Keyboard has 28 keys on the top row. The other rows have special keys that make it difficult to compare, but there is basically also room for 28 in the bottom row, except one spot where there is one key in a space for 2x2 keys. Begining from the bottom and coutning keys there are 27. Skipping those that take up space in two or more rows, when going to the next row from the bottom there are 23, then 24, then 18, then 27 and finally 28 keys in the top row, for a total of 147 keys (vs 105 on a regular keyboard). Then there are 54 extra keys above the keyboard to the left (27 shown) and 156 in 6 rows of 26 to the right for a total of 357 keys 330 shown. All six rows have keys all the way over with no empty space in between, as there are on regular keyboards. Also there are no space between the top row (with F1 button etc) and those below. At each side of the keyboard the keys do no align at the edges, which is normally the case. The keyboard has several special features, most of which are labeled. The only special features that is not labeled is a small square with 2x2 keys that are elevated a bit above all other keys. It is in the region above the normal position of the four arrows. All eight other special features have an arrow pointing to them from their labels. Here below is a description of the labeled items as well as a transcript of their labels. They are listed in the order of their labels first above and then below the keyboard going from left to right.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Five keys close to the QWERTY keys positions have colorful emoji on them. They each take up the space of 2x2 normal keys, although it is not clear if all the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; keys have the same size:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hardcoded plastic keys for the 5 most useful emoji&lt;br /&gt;
:😰 😂 🐙 🏇 🚡&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A cube with 3x3 keys on each side hangs above the keyboard to the left supported by a small rod. Three sides are fully visible, 27 keys:]&lt;br /&gt;
:54 configurable Rubik's keys&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Just right of the middle above the main keyboard is a cylinder with keys inside in 6 rows of 26 keys (126 in all). It either decreases in diameter into it making it look almost like a tunnel, or is drawn as if it almost disappear in the far distance, being much deeper than it should be.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ergonomic design&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In the region where the normal numberpad would be there are 15 numbers from 1 to 15 in a 4x4 grid leaving space for an empty key hole. There is a row of keys both above and below this grid. The numbers do not come in order from 1 to 15, but rather in a jumble. Also the empty hole is not a full key spot. Instead it is in the second row of numbers, with a bit more space to the left than to the right of the middle of the three keys.]&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+15 puzzle-style numberpad&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[To the left in the second row (below the Caps Lock position) the outer key is twice as wide as the other normal keys.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Serif Lock&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[An arrow points to the eight key in the bottom row, but is probably just referring to all the keys in general:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Unlimited key travel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[There is a segment of the keyboard that seems to be empty of keys, but still white like the rest of the keys, not black as where keys are actually missing. It is where on a regular keyboard, the normal keys are separated from the special function keys. But it turns out it is indeed a long key going vertically:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Diagonal spacebar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Where the four arrow keys are on a regular keyboard there is a 2x2 key segment that only has one key in the middle with black background around it. It has an arrow head on it pointing right. That is if the key had not been turned about 45 degree counter clockwise, so the arrow points up to the right.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Arrow key (rotate to adjust direction)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Emoji]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=841:_Audiophiles&amp;diff=167693</id>
		<title>841: Audiophiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=841:_Audiophiles&amp;diff=167693"/>
				<updated>2019-01-04T10:56:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 841&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 31, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Audiophiles&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = audiophiles.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = For years, I took the wrong lesson from that Monster Cable experiment and only listened to my music through alligator-clipped coat hangers.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is buying some new speakers for his television, and asks [[Megan]] if they have the right cord to hook them up. Megan begins chiding him for using &amp;quot;crappy little laptop speakers&amp;quot;, i.e. low-powered, low-quality speakers that don't faithfully reproduce the sound. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball and Megan reproduce the two extremes of the arguments: Cueball simply wants to play a shooter (hardly known for their ethereal soundtracks), regardless of the sound quality, whereas Megan, the audiophile, values music everywhere. Cueball seems to think that's unnecessary, and Megan snipes back that he's never heard beauty, so he wouldn't know; after all, he thinks low-bit-rate re-encodings from YouTube (at the time, notorious for dodgy sound quality) are perfectly fine music. Cueball, frustrated with Megan's perfectionism, states that he's just going to buy cheap 5-watt speakers. While 5 watts may be a lot if you're trying to fill the immediate area with sound from your MP3 player, it'd sound tiny and hollow coming out of a television across the room. An incredulous Megan protests, calling his ideas &amp;quot;a joke.&amp;quot; An exasperated Cueball tells a {{w|Lightbulb joke|lightbulb joke}}, the content of which implies that the content doesn't matter to her, only the quality in which it's delivered to her ear. Megan promptly hangs up (possibly because of the bad audio quality?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is referring to a [http://forums.audioholics.com/forums/threads/speakers-when-is-good-enough-enough.2512/page-2 forum post from audioholics.com,] where a user did a blind audio test using monster cable and coat hangers with soldered on alligator clips, and the audiophiles were unable to discern any difference. Randall instead just uses coat-hangers to connect his speakers, not getting thatthe point of the test was not to extol the high transmission quality of coat hanger wire, but to lampoon the belief that supposedly high-quality speaker cables make an audible difference in audio output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball and Megan are talking over the telephone. The first two panels are split diagonally. Cueball is at a store, holding a box, and Megan is consulting with him.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Do we have an RCA-to-3.5mm female-female plug? I'm getting some speakers for the new Xbox, since the monitor doesn't have any.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Are they crappy laptop speakers? ''Ugh.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing next to a sale rack.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Does it matter? I just want to hear if I'm getting shot at, not savor every detail of a beautiful musical soundscape.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: You've never ''heard'' a beautiful musical soundscape. You listen to 96kbps flv rips from YouTube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan is walking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Whatever. I'm just going to get these $20 speakers. Five watts will be plenty.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Five watts for a living room sound system? Is that a joke?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: No, this is a joke: How many audiophiles does it take to change a lightbulb?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How many?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I'll tell you later—you wouldn't appreciate the punchline over this 12kbps cell phone codec.&lt;br /&gt;
:''click''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video games]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2088:_Schwarzschild%27s_Cat&amp;diff=167268</id>
		<title>2088: Schwarzschild's Cat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2088:_Schwarzschild%27s_Cat&amp;diff=167268"/>
				<updated>2018-12-22T17:23:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2088&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 21, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Schwarzschild's Cat&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = schwarzschilds_cat.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Cats can be smaller than the critical limit, but they're unobservable. If one shrinks enough that it crosses the limit, it just appears to get cuter and cuter as it slowly fades from view.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a SMALL CAT WITH NO CONCEPT OF FIELD EQUATIONS. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is primarily a wordplay joke about the {{w|Schwarzschild radius}}, or the radius surrounding a black hole corresponding to the {{w|event horizon}}. The event horizon, in turn, is the limit from which nothing can leave a black hole. The joke is that, apparently, smaller cats are cuter, and there is a limit below which a sufficiently small cat (but larger than zero) will approach infinite cuteness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's also a reference to the {{w|Schrödinger's cat}} thought-experiment, since the name (Erwin) &amp;quot;Schrödinger&amp;quot; is easily confused with (Karl) &amp;quot;Schwarzschild&amp;quot; and both men were interested in quantum physics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text makes multiple allusions. First, it alludes to what happens when an object falls into a black hole. From an outside observer's point of view, such objects appear to slow down and take an infinite amount of time to cross the Schwarzschild radius due to the time dilation of {{w|General relativity}}. The object's photons will become increasingly red-shifted, fading as they lose energy to the black hole's gravity well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown. The x-axis is labeled &amp;quot;Cat size&amp;quot; and the y-axis, &amp;quot;Cat cuteness&amp;quot;. Parallel to and a short distance from the y axis is a dashed line the same length as the y-axis line; the space between the y axis and the dashed line is labelled &amp;quot;Critical Limit&amp;quot;. Graphed is a function coming down from infinity, starting close to the dashed line; it then levels off and does not reach zero on-screen. At the top end of the graph is the text &amp;quot;Schwarzschild's Cat&amp;quot; and an arrow pointing upwards outside of the graph.]&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2088:_Schwarzschild%27s_Cat&amp;diff=167267</id>
		<title>2088: Schwarzschild's Cat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2088:_Schwarzschild%27s_Cat&amp;diff=167267"/>
				<updated>2018-12-22T17:22:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2088&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 21, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Schwarzschild's Cat&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = schwarzschilds_cat.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Cats can be smaller than the critical limit, but they're unobservable. If one shrinks enough that it crosses the limit, it just appears to get cuter and cuter as it slowly fades from view.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a SMALL CAT WITH NO CONCEPT OF FIELD EQUATIONS. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is primarily a wordplay joke about the {{w|Schwarzschild radius}}, or the radius surrounding a black hole corresponding to the {{w|event horizon}}. The event horizon, in turn, is the limit from which nothing can leave a black hole. The joke is that, apparently, smaller cats are cuter, and there is a limit below which a sufficiently small cat (but larger than zero) will approach infinite cuteness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's also a reference to the {{w|Schrödinger's cat}} thought-experiment, since the name (Erwin) &amp;quot;Schrödinger&amp;quot; is easily confused with (Karl) &amp;quot;Schwarzschild&amp;quot; and both men were interested in quantum physics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text makes multiple allusions. First, it alludes to what happens when an object falls into a black hole. From an outside observer's point of view, such objects appear to slow down and take an infinite amount of time to cross the Schwarzschild radius due to the time dilation of {{w|General relativity}}. The object's photons will become increasingly red-shifted, fading as they lose energy to the black hole's gravity well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown. The x-axis is labeled &amp;quot;Cat size&amp;quot; and the y-axis, &amp;quot;Cat cuteness&amp;quot;. Parallel to and a short distance from the y axis is a dashed line the same length as the y-axis line; the space between the y axis and the dashed line is labelled &amp;quot;Critical Limit&amp;quot;. Graphed is a function coming down from infinity, starting close to the dashed line; it then levels off and does not reach zero on-screen. At the top end of the function is the text &amp;quot;Schwarzschild's Cat&amp;quot; and an arrow to indicate it.]&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2083:_Laptop_Issues&amp;diff=166894</id>
		<title>2083: Laptop Issues</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2083:_Laptop_Issues&amp;diff=166894"/>
				<updated>2018-12-11T16:29:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2083&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 10, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Laptop Issues&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = laptop_issues.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Hang on, we got a call from the feds. They say we can do whatever with him, but the EPA doesn't want that laptop in the ocean. They're sending a team.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Explanations could be improved. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] goes to tech support with his laptop. [[Hairy]] and [[Ponytail]] are waiting behind the counter; one has dealt with [[:Category:Cueball Computer Problems|Cueball's bizarre tech issues]] before, and warns the other. Sure enough, Cueball sets the computer down and offers a detailed list of the arcane problems his computer is giving him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''My laptop's battery won't hold a charge.''&lt;br /&gt;
: A common problem; as batteries are frequently charged and recharged, their capacity for storing charge deteriorates. However...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''Tried [replacing the battery]. Now the new ones won't either.''&lt;br /&gt;
: ...the problem persisting despite the battery's replacement fails to make any significant sense. It may be a problem with his laptop's charging port, but his comment that the &amp;quot;new ones&amp;quot; now fail to hold a charge seems to imply it is persisting despite the replacement batteries being used elsewhere after attempting to use them for his laptop and failing... Many modern batteries have firmware built in now that reports their charge level. It is possible that his laptop is installing a faulty firmware to any batteries that get connected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''Also, random files get corrupted on the first of every month.''&lt;br /&gt;
: Some devices may be scheduled to do a &amp;quot;disk cleanup&amp;quot; on the first of every month. Somehow, this task is corrupting files that should be kept.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''Factory reset didn't help.''&lt;br /&gt;
: A factory reset of a device deletes all files, undoes all customizations, and generally puts the system back to square one. Under normal circumstances, this is an effective last-resort measure for dealing with glitches, viruses, and malware, so the fact that it doesn't offer any help suggests that the device's factory settings were already corrupt when they were first made or that the problem is hardware-related.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''When it's plugged in, I get static shocks from my plumbing.''&lt;br /&gt;
: Static charge from a portable device while it's charging is common. Static charge on other items in the building is not. However, plumbing systems on older houses were often used to provide a ground instead of using grounding rods, which are now the accepted norm. This could imply that for Cueball's house is old, and for some reason his laptop is pumping a large amount of charge directly to ground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''And it reboots if someone uses an arc welder nearby''&lt;br /&gt;
: The high power draw of an arc welder will occasionally cause less devoted power supplies to flicker. Coupled with the bad battery that can not keep the computer running when the power dips, this might cause his laptop to reboot. This could also be just because the arc welder is causing a large amount of electromagnetic interference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''Transitions® lenses go dark when exposed to the screen''&lt;br /&gt;
: Transition lenses in prescription glasses darken when exposed directly to UV rays; this is to avoid the wearer any hassle of needing prescription sunglasses. This seems to indicate that the screen of Cueball's laptop is emitting UV radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; ''and when I open too many tabs, it fogs nearby photographic film.''&lt;br /&gt;
: The screen would have to be emitting X-rays that can pass through the film's container and expose the film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sheer incongruity of everything Cueball has reported, in combination with past issues, leads Hairy to report that his manager has authorized Cueball and his laptop be thrown into the ocean. Cueball accepts this without objection. This is a reference to [[1912:_Thermostat|1912: Thermostat]], where Cueball has an issue with their thermostat, and the Tech support employee asks them if they have tried walking into the sea. It seems this suggestion has evolved into forcefully throwing him into the sea, for lack of a better idea. It could also be that this is a reference back to the first of Cueball's many [[:Category:Cueball Computer Problems|computer problems]] which began with [[349: Success]] where he ended up in the ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains mention of the {{w|Environmental Protection Agency}}, (EPA) a part of the United States government responsible for preventing pollution. In real life, most of a laptop computer's components are considered toxic waste, and the EPA, as part of their mission, would not want it dumped in the ocean. More to the point, it's implied that whatever Cueball did to it renders it far more dangerous than an ordinary laptop, and the EPA ''really'' doesn't want his cursed possessions in the ocean; thus they are sending a {{w|Dangerous goods | hazmat}} team to collect the laptop and safely dispose of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is walking past a sign reading &amp;quot;Tech Support,&amp;quot; with a right-pointing arrow and carrying a laptop.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Off panel voice #1: ''Oh no.''&lt;br /&gt;
:Off panel voice #2: ''What?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Off panel voice #1: ''This guy.  He has the worst tech problems.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball at tech support desk with an open laptop facing Hairy and Ponytail.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: My laptop's battery won't hold a charge.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: We can replace it.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Tried that.  Now the new ones won't either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Cueball]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Also, random files get corrupted on the first day of every month.  Factory reset didn't help.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off panel voice #2: ''You weren't kidding.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Cueball]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: When it's plugged in, I get static shocks from my plumbing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off panel voice: What the...&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: And it reboots if someone uses an arc welder nearby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Same tableau as second panel except that the laptop is slightly open now.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Transitions® lenses go dark when exposed to the screen, and when I open too many tabs, it fogs nearby photographic film.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: We don't usually do this, but I've gotten permission from my manager to have you and the laptop hurled into the ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: That's probably for the best.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cueball Computer Problems]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2014:_JWST_Delays&amp;diff=159561</id>
		<title>2014: JWST Delays</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2014:_JWST_Delays&amp;diff=159561"/>
				<updated>2018-07-03T08:40:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ Slope.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 2, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = JWST Delays&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = jwst_delays.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Since delays should get less likely closer to the launch, most astronomers in 2018 believed the expansion of the schedule was slowing, but by early 2020 new measurements indicated that it was actually accelerating.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a DELAYED TELESCOPE - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
The {{w|James Webb Space Telescope}} (JWST) is a {{w|space telescope}} that was created to be the successor of the {{w|Hubble Space Telescope}}. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The telescope has been in development since 1996, but has been plagued by numerous delays and cost overruns. As of July 2, 2018, the JWST is scheduled to launch on March 30, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic portrays the launch delays and the new predicted launch years and the times at which those predictions were made.  There have been so many delays in this project that you can plot a line of best fit with a high degree of accuracy.  Randall says optimistically that the line’s slope is less than one (there is less than one year of ''new'' delay per year of elapsed time), implying, of course, that if events continue without further intervention, it will eventually be built, with a predicted date of late 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text both sarcastically suggests that the JWST will have enough delays to fill a universe, pointing out a well-known astronomical fact, and compares the universe’s accelerating expansion to the apparently ever-delaying schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikipedia article linked above includes a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope#Cost_and_schedule_issues table] which provides the data points for the chart:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! width=35 | Year !! Planned&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;launch !! Time left&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;(years)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1997 || 2007 || 10&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1998 || 2007 || 9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1999 || 2007 to 2008 || 8-9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2000 || 2009 || 9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002 || 2010 || 8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2003 || 2011 || 8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2005 || 2013 || 8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006 || 2014 || 8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2008 || 2014 || 6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2010 || 2015 to 2016 || 5-6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011 || 2018 || 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2013 || 2018 || 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2017 || 2019 || 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2018 || 2020 || 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2018 || 2021 || 3&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2002:_LeBron_James_and_Stephen_Curry&amp;diff=158256</id>
		<title>Talk:2002: LeBron James and Stephen Curry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2002:_LeBron_James_and_Stephen_Curry&amp;diff=158256"/>
				<updated>2018-06-04T14:15:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I have no idea what this is about, but wondered if Stephen Curry was related to the Curry twins Tom and Ben, who are both over 6' - or to Tim, who isn't except in heels.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Arachrah|Arachrah]] ([[User talk:Arachrah|talk]]) 07:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Both LeBron James and Stephen Curry are famous NBA players. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.190.4|172.69.190.4]] 08:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::How would you not know that? And even if you don't know who they are, you must have at least heard about them before, right? [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 09:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Not everyone is from USA. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.190.4|172.69.190.4]] 09:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: That excuse could work, except your IP address is based in the USA :) [[User:Zachweix|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix|talk]]) 12:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I like Curry. You know, the dish. And the actor. Tim, that is. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Not everyone in the USA follows sports. I've heard of LeBron James, but only in passing. The only Curry I know of is a fictional one from some old movie.&lt;br /&gt;
;Nate Silver&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nate Silver is famous for his numerical approach and extensive use of statistics and simulations.&lt;br /&gt;
He foresaw a probability of 28.6% for Donald to win the electoral college just before the election. That is a greater chance than most political commentators would have granted Donald. Typical betting sites saw Hillary 5:1 ahead at the evening of the election.&lt;br /&gt;
So I would not at all say that he got everything wrong in 2016. He predicted that Hillary would be a formidable number of votes ahead as most probable outcome, but also that many states would be very tight.&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/]]. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.106|172.68.110.106]] 09:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Definitions needed &lt;br /&gt;
Hi!  Could definitions be added for some of the terms used, such as &amp;quot;bleachers&amp;quot;? Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.200|162.158.155.200]] 11:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Magnetic North&lt;br /&gt;
I would have liked the &amp;quot;magnetic north&amp;quot; thing to be due to the geographical orientation of the teams home courts (if the Cavaliers are the only team to have a court that happens to be roughly north-south oriented, it would explain the higher points value). Looking at the Stupid Name Arena, however, it appears that the court inside is probably about NW-SE. Too bad. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 14:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2002:_LeBron_James_and_Stephen_Curry&amp;diff=158254</id>
		<title>2002: LeBron James and Stephen Curry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2002:_LeBron_James_and_Stephen_Curry&amp;diff=158254"/>
				<updated>2018-06-04T14:10:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 4, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = LeBron James and Stephen Curry&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lebron_james_and_stephen_curry.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The 538TR attempts to capture a player's combined skill at basketball (either real-life or NBA 2K18) and election forecasting.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a Basketball - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first glance, the comic looks like an in-depth analysis of two {{w|NBA}} star players, {{w|LeBron James}} and {{w|Stephen Curry}}. The joke is that while comprehensive, all the statistics are completely meaningless - many don't show any correlation, and if there is one, it's extremely unlikely there is any causal link in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first graph includes a nine-digit {{w|Social Security number}} issued for US citizens which is typically not considered a metric related to athletic ability. As Social Security numbers are essentially random numbers, the graph shows only the free-throw percentage of a large number of players, artificially spread vertically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second graph looks at teammate's {{w|APGAR score}} which is used to quickly summarize the health of newborn children. APGAR scores of 7 and above indicate an infant has generally normal health.  This graph indicates LeBron's teammates have an APGAR score of approximately 2.1.  Scores of 3 and below are generally regarded as critically low and possibly requiring medical attention.  Low APGAR scores can also be associated with increased risk of neurological disorders such as cerebral palsey.  The joke appears to be that LeBron is a star player carrying a sub average team while their opponents the Warriors are perhaps a more well rounded team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shot map shows from what position Curry's shots were scored compared to other NBA players. It shows that he scored several times from outside the playing field, including twice from the {{w|bleacher}}s (which isn't a legal play), and once from the locker room (which is physically impossible due to multiple walls in between).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the &amp;quot;2018 total points&amp;quot; table, the highlighted {{w|Golden State Warriors}} and {{w|Cleveland Cavaliers}} represent the teams of Stephen Curry and LeBron James respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note about the alignment with Magnetic North is likely a reference to Foxes. Artic and Red Foxes both have a distinctive hunting method, called 'mousing', involving tracking prey that is hiding under the snow, then leaping into the air and diving into the snow head-first, to try to catch the prey. A study found that they are more likely (to a statistically significant degree) to catch their prey when mousing, when they start facing approximately 20 degrees east of Magnetic North. (link: [http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/01/11/foxes-use-the-earths-magnetic-field-as-a-targeting-system/])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table at the bottom includes more unrelated comparisons, for example both &amp;quot;lebronjames&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;stephencurry&amp;quot; are worth 22 points in {{w|Scrabble}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both their heights being over 6' is not at all unusual for basketball players. It may also be a reference to a theory that all Sith lords in the Star Wars franchise must be over 6'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Nate Silver}} is a political commentator and founder of the website {{w|FiveThirtyEight}}, which uses and promotes statistical approaches in explaining the world.  The site's two major areas of focus are in politics (especially on elections - it became famous for correctly predicting for whom 49 of 50 of the 2008 and every US state would vote for in the 2012 US presidential elections, and though it wasn't as accurate in 2016 it had given Donald Trump a larger chance of Electoral College victory than other mainstream media sources) and sports (Silver first got into statistical analysis via baseball). The presence of both sports-related and politics-related topics in the comic, however related they are (or not) with each other, seems to be a nod towards FiveThirtyEight's content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:'''NBA Playoffs ''DataDive'' '''&lt;br /&gt;
:'''LeBron James and Stephen Curry'''&lt;br /&gt;
:'''What makes these superstars so extraordinary?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic consists of several plots and tables, listed here in western reading order.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Scatter plot of Social Security number vs Free throw percentage'''&lt;br /&gt;
:The Social Security numbers range from 000-00-0000 to 999-99-9999. No pattern discrenable, aside from points being a bit denser in the middle of the plot. Steven Curry is marked as a point on the right edge of the plot with a high free throw percentage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Scatter plot of 2018 points per game vs Average teammate APGAR score'''&lt;br /&gt;
:The APGAR scores range from 0 to 10. Pattern suggests a somewhat positive link between the two factors. LeBron James is marked as having a lot of points, but a low teammate APGAR score of approximately 2.1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Shot map'''&lt;br /&gt;
:A map of a basketball field is shown with dots placed where players have taken shots at the goal. Steven Curry has dots in a separate color. For the all players category the dots generally cluster next to the goal basket and in front of the three point line. Steven has no dots next to the basket, but does cluster next to the three point line. He also has several dots off the side of the playing field, including three in the bleachers and one in the locker room.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Sandwiches eaten during play vs Win %'''&lt;br /&gt;
:A plot that suggests no relation between the factors because practically all dots are in the zero sandwiches column. 2018 Warriors have one dot marked as a high win % and 4 sandwiches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''2018 total points'''&lt;br /&gt;
:A table listing teams and their total scores with an extra column labeled &amp;quot;When net is within 15° of magnetic north&amp;quot;. The row for the Cleveland Cavaliers is highlighted and shows an abnormally high score in the magnetic north column.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class = &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! 2018 total points&lt;br /&gt;
! Overall &lt;br /&gt;
! When net is within 15° of magnetic north&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Golden State Warriors'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''9304'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''330'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Houston Rockets&lt;br /&gt;
|9213&lt;br /&gt;
|268&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|New Orleans Pelicans&lt;br /&gt;
|9161&lt;br /&gt;
|219&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Toronto Raptors&lt;br /&gt;
|9156&lt;br /&gt;
|341&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Cleveland Cavaliers'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''9091'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''1644'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Denver Nuggets&lt;br /&gt;
|9020&lt;br /&gt;
|280&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A table at the bottom:]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class = &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
! Stephen Curry&lt;br /&gt;
! LeBron James&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Have you heard of him&lt;br /&gt;
|Probably&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|President during most recent game 7 loss&lt;br /&gt;
|Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|Bush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pog collection&lt;br /&gt;
|Large&lt;br /&gt;
|Staggeringly large&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Career average Fed interest rate&lt;br /&gt;
|3.42%&lt;br /&gt;
|4.41%&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Name Scrabble score&lt;br /&gt;
|22&lt;br /&gt;
|22&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Best sport&lt;br /&gt;
|Basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|Basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Height&lt;br /&gt;
|Over 6'&lt;br /&gt;
|Over 6'&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Retirement year&lt;br /&gt;
|2027&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
!Nate Silver&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FiveThirtyEight total rating&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(devised by Nate Silver to combine all metrics into a single stat)&lt;br /&gt;
|'''37.4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''31.8'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''86.6'''&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sport]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Basketball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Nate Silver]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:224:_Lisp&amp;diff=153118</id>
		<title>Talk:224: Lisp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:224:_Lisp&amp;diff=153118"/>
				<updated>2018-02-26T15:30:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I reckon I disagree with this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, Cueball marvels at the fundamental and complete nature of the language of creation that he sees in his dream, the ultimate low level language, before being told by God that the universe was mostly built using a high level programming language, perl.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, despite it's age, Lisp is also a high-level language and lispers probably spend more of their time dealing with higher-level abstractions than perlists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's causing the narrator's marvel in the comic is that Lisp has a very elegant (almost non-existent) syntax and the language has a very close relationship with the underlying syntactical structure of the program, and that thinking about it does tend to give suitably-minded hackers feelings of awe and reverence, once they grok it. Even Larry Wall, the creator of Perl, will readily concede that Lisp is beautiful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perl, on the other hand, has masses of totally unrelated syntactical bits and pieces drawn from almost everywhere (basic syntax from C, a bunch of environment variables from shell or awk, an inline documentation format, inline regular expressions, formats borrowed from Fortran, bolted-on pseudo-OO from god-knows-where, you name it), so the language, is huge, messy, non-orthogonal, and ugly - but it does have the advantage that if you need a small job done, you can usually get it done in perl rather fast, at the cost, perhaps, of maintainability for long-term or large projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the narrator dreams that the entire universe was created using the cleanest, most elegant and beautiful computer language so far discovered, one which allows the user to create software in terms of high-level abstractions if he or she chooses to; but in reality, God tells him it was a quick-dirty hack-job done in the dirtiest, ugliest - but effective nonetheless - language around. {{unsigned|‎86.165.192.2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that A) you've missed the point of that statement, and B) If you believe the explanation to be inaccurate or incomplete you are fully encouraged to edit it. Also, Perl is not the dirtiest, ugliest language around. There are innumerable contenders, but I'd say {{w|Brainfuck}} is definitely in the running, and I personally would say that Java is in there too. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 05:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perl isn't a bad language. The regular expressions that it offers are fantastic, and it's at least ''consistent''. Java's a slow messy and vulnerability-ridden language, but I'd have to go with PHP for the most awful, broken and incomplete piece of crap you could possibly use. Literally has no redeeming features outside of momentum and inexplicably widespread support. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I never said Perl was bad. I need to teach myself Perl. and that Regular Expressions as we know them today came from Perl, is evidence enough that Perl is a wonderful language. And, I'll agree with you that PHP is an ugly, ugly, disgusting piece of trash. As someone who's had to do OO-PHP, just don't, run far away. I did. I ran to Ruby on Rails, and my life, as a web developer, has been heavenly. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 07:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisp, the &amp;quot;ultimate low level language&amp;quot;? Ok, whoever wrote that really does not know what he/she is talknig about. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most valuable characteristics of Lisp is the fact that is can be used in functional paradigm. Perl can also be used that way, but is considered a more hackish language and not as elegant as Lisp.&lt;br /&gt;
Perl language can solve problems with different methods, and the phrase &amp;quot;ostensibly, yes. Honestly, we hacked most of it together with perl&amp;quot; means that the universe was created with perl, but trying to use Lisp way of programing (probably functional paradigm), instead of actually doing it on Lisp (probably for speed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, in case is not clear to somebody, Lisp is a HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Java and php would have to compete for the title of the &amp;quot;the dirtiest, ugliest - but effective nonetheless - language around&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/189.135.124.172|189.135.124.172]] 18:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, somewhat a Perl-head here, but not going to add to the arguments about that.  Instead: I think &amp;quot;My God, it's full of stars!&amp;quot; is ''not'' a quote from 2001 (where I'm fairly sure there's no broadcast dialoguge at all after Hal is silenced), but from the sequal, 2010, in the part where they 'review' the final recordings of the 2001 mission.  But I really need someone who has these two films at hand to check before amending the explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Oh, go on then.  Can I nominate Ada as the most godawful 'proper' language?  Not as awkward as COBOL can be (for a proper programmer who doesn't need the &amp;quot;Business Orientated&amp;quot; tendencies), but has just the right (or wrong) mix of strictness to get my back up even while maintaining a pretence of being readable.  Mind you, it's 20 years since I've used it, so memories about it may be distorted or outdated.) [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 21:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Java is much more elegant and far less hacky than C++, and it's much faster than some people like to admit. It amazes me how many people complain about how &amp;quot;slow&amp;quot; it is, but have nothing but praise for languages like Python. Of course, C++ is much easier to optimize where time is critical. &amp;lt;/minirant&amp;gt; [[Special:Contributions/72.9.93.56|72.9.93.56]] 13:59, 3 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a direct reference to the &amp;quot;Lisp epiphany&amp;quot; that many non-LISP programmers are said to experience upon realizing how heavily influenced LISP was by mathematical logic. This is explained far better in a later explanation. It could be brought in here. --[[User:Quicksilver|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver|talk]]) 03:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know whether it's important or not, but the line &amp;quot;My God, it's full of stars!&amp;quot; is the title of a chapter in The Little Schemer, which is considered (IMO) a classic CompSci book. If Randall has, by chance, read the book he may have also pulled the inspiration from there as well as 2001. I don't know whetiher this warrents a trivia block or not. [[Special:Contributions/67.176.146.186|67.176.146.186]] 06:34, 27 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:the quote comes from the book, not the movie. {{unsigned ip|173.245.53.129}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisp is the best language, unfortunately it's not that widely used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisp is a high and low level language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The worst programming language ever has to be Kodu game lab. Or possibly Malbodge. {{unsigned ip|141.101.98.244}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perl is the language designed for the convenience of use. It mimics the natural language in the sense that it has great many slightly different features but each feature makes the most sense for its intended use and allows to write the easily understandable programs. An example of opposite is Pascal, which is a tiny language (i.e. &amp;quot;elegant&amp;quot; in the terms of its creator) but you can't do may things with it at all, and for what you can do, you have to turn yourself inside out. Lisp started in 1950s kind of like Pascal but then collected great many different features over time, each one to fix some of its inborn limitations. You still have to turn yourself inside out when you write in Lisp but nowadays there are great many ways to do so. If you wonder, Pascal had been extended as well, and Delphi is an example of an overgrown Pascal. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.5|108.162.246.5]] 21:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the 2001 quote... I have the October 1968 Arrow paperback edition (09 001530 4) by A.C.Clarke and on page 221 Dave Bowman remarks &amp;quot;The thing's hollow - it goes on for ever - and - oh my God - it's full of stars!&amp;quot;. So yes, in the movie this line was never used but in Clarke's novelization of his and Kubrick's screenplay it's there. Fast forward to 1984 with the release of 2010 and the filmmakers decided to put this soundbite in the intro to good effect. So yes it was never in the 2001 movie and was in the 2010 movie but as aforementioned, it was in the 2001 book. [[User:Squirreltape|Squirreltape]] ([[User talk:Squirreltape|talk]]) 20:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that the &amp;quot;ostensibly, yes&amp;quot; refers to Greenspun's tenth rule so I added this to the explanation. A complete set of rules for the universe is complex enough for the rule to apply. [[User:Meneldal|Meneldal]] ([[User talk:Meneldal|talk]]) 04:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)meneldal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remeber, one day we must all go through those Perly gates. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.254|173.245.54.254]] 16:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the subject of the Universe's implementation language: http://www.songworm.com/lyrics/songworm-parody/EternalFlame.html [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 15:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152637</id>
		<title>1956: Unification</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152637"/>
				<updated>2018-02-17T10:43:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Unifications */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1956&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 16, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Unification&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = unification.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = For a while, some physicists worked on a theory unifying the other forces with both the force of gravity and the film &amp;quot;Gravity,&amp;quot; but even after Alfonso Cuarón was held in a deep underground chamber of water for 10^31 years he refused to sell his film to Disney.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In physics, the fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces, are the interactions that do not appear to be reducible to more basic interactions. There are four {{w|fundamental interactions}} known to exist: the {{w|gravity|gravitational}} and {{w|electromagnetism|electromagnetic}} interactions, which produce significant long-range forces whose effects can be seen directly in everyday life, and the {{w|strong interaction|strong}} and {{w|weak interactions|weak}} interactions, which produce forces at minuscule, subatomic distances and govern nuclear interactions. Some scientists speculate that a fifth force might exist, but, if so, it is not widely accepted nor proven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic lists five physical forces (it split up electricity and magnetism), but also includes a number of other things (two countries and three businesses) that are known for &amp;quot;unifying&amp;quot; in a non-physics sense. {{w|East Germany|East}} and {{w|West Germany}} {{w|German reunification|united politically in 1990}}, more than forty years after being divided at the end of {{w|World War II}}. Entertainment company {{w|Disney}} has united in a business sense with a number of others over the years; the comic mentions animation studio {{w|Pixar}} and the ''{{w|Star Wars}}'' franchise. The comic states that this is the progress toward unifying the fundamental forces of nature, which is absurd, with the addition of Disney and {{w|Germany}}, both which are not one of the fundamental forces.{{Citation needed}} Star Wars is, of course, all about {{w|The Force (Star Wars)|The Force}}, but this has, for some reason, gone unnoticed by most physicists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text jokes that some physicist tried to unify the force of {{w|gravity}} with the 2013 movie ''{{w|Gravity (2013 film)|Gravity}}'', starring {{w|Sandra Bullock}}. Of course, this is also absurd, but it turns out that this is just another jab by [[Randall]] at {{w|George Lucas}} for selling his rights to ''{{w|Star Wars}}'' to {{w|Disney}}. The jab comes when he makes it clear that the director of ''Gravity'' {{w|Alfonso Cuarón}} would refuse to sell the rights to his film to Disney, even if he was held in underground chamber of water for 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This water chamber and incredible time span is a reference to {{w|Proton decay}}, which is being investigated by trying to detect the {{w|Cherenkov radiation}} that could occur from possible decay of protons in water. These measurements are being conducted in {{w|Proton_decay#Experimental_evidence|immense water tanks}} buried under mountains to protect them against similar signals that could result from cosmic radiation. The same type of tanks have been used to detect {{w|neutrinos}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The half life of protons is currently believed to be between 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;36&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years. This should be compared to the age of the universe at around 1.3 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years, which means that one second compared to the age of the universe is larger than the smallest suggested half life of the proton (as used in the comic) compared to the age of the universe, by a factor of about 10,000, but even this time would not make Cuarón cave in...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unifications===&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Item&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unifications&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Electricity&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Electricity and magnetism were historically considered separate forces. Observations through the 19th century indicated that the two were closely linked, however, and the work of James Clerk Maxwell finally established their common identity in 1873. Today, their unified explanation, {{w|electromagnetism}}, is considered one of the four fundamental interactions in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The unification of electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force—known as the {{w|electroweak interaction}}—is the only currently-accepted unification of two fundamental forces. Two Nobel Prizes in Physics have been awarded for work on this unification, in 1979 and in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Weak force&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Strong force&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|The strong nuclear force is similar to the electroweak forces, as they are all part of the model known as {{w|quantum field theory}} (QFT). There have been attempts to unify them to produce a so-called {{w|Grand Unified Theory}}. No model of their unification has yet been shown to be correct, and it remains a major unsolved problem in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Gravity&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unlike the other three fundamental forces, gravity is not described by QFT, but by {{w|general relativity}} (GR). A so-called &amp;quot;{{w|Theory of Everything}}&amp;quot;, describing both QFT and GR, could also unify gravity and the other forces. Such a unification is still strictly hypothetical, however.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!East Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|In 1945, after Nazi Germany's defeat in the Second World War, Germany was occupied by the Allied Forces. At first, it was expected that the whole country would be transitioned to a single post-war government, but but political and ideological differences between the Soviet Union and the other allies (which developed into the Cold War) prevented this. The Soviet-controlled zone became the German Democratic Republic, or {{w|East Germany}}, while the British, American and French zones of control merged to form the Federal Republic of Germany, or {{w|West Germany}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the fall of the Berlin Wall (a physical and symbolic representation of the division) in 1989, and the fall of the East German socialist government in the &amp;quot;Peaceful Revolution&amp;quot;, {{w|German reunification}} again became an immediate possibility. By late 1990, the merger was achieved, with East Germany joining the federal structure already existing in West Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just under two weeks before this comic appeared, on 2018-02-05, the Berlin Wall had been &amp;quot;gone as long as it had stood&amp;quot;, namely 28 years, two months, and 27 days.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!West Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Pixar was originally a part of the computer division of Lucasfilm, but was spun off into a separate business in 1986. The studio had a positive partnership with Walt Disney Animation, which resulted in a deal for Pixar to produce animated feature films for Walt Disney Pictures. Though the partnership later became strained, Disney agreed to buy Pixar in 2006. Pixar films produced after this acquisition have been branded &amp;quot;Disney-Pixar&amp;quot; films.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The Star Wars franchise was perhaps the most successful and best-known property of Lucasfilm, the company founded by George Lucas in 1971. Discussion in 2011 of a distribution deal with Disney, around the time that Lucas was planning his retirement, turned into the outright purchase of Lucasfilm by Disney in 2012. Since then, Disney has extensively revamped and developed the Star Wars franchise, with three new films and a television series released by the date of this comic, and several more in the works.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Pixar&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Star Wars&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ten rounded frames with text inside are shown in two rows. Below each frame there is a line going down and then this line either joins with one or two of the other frames lines or in two cases do not joins with any other. At the bottom of the panel the now five remaining lines turn towards the center of the bottom of the panel and ends in arrows that points towards three question marks. The first three frames' lines are unified, same goes for the next two, and the three after that. The lines of the last two are not joined with any other lines. The text in the transcript is given as it appears from left to right, disregarding if it is the top or bottom row, but this will alternate through the ten frames, starting with one up, then one down etc.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group one, starting with up:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Electricity&lt;br /&gt;
:Magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
:Weak force&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group two starting with down:]&lt;br /&gt;
:East Germany&lt;br /&gt;
:West Germany&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group three starting with down:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Star Wars&lt;br /&gt;
:Disney&lt;br /&gt;
:Pixar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two single frames, the first is up:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Strong force&lt;br /&gt;
:Gravity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[All five arrows points to this:]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;???&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Progress toward unifying the fundamental forces of nature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Star Wars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fiction]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geography]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152636</id>
		<title>1956: Unification</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152636"/>
				<updated>2018-02-17T10:38:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ GDR/FRG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1956&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 16, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Unification&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = unification.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = For a while, some physicists worked on a theory unifying the other forces with both the force of gravity and the film &amp;quot;Gravity,&amp;quot; but even after Alfonso Cuarón was held in a deep underground chamber of water for 10^31 years he refused to sell his film to Disney.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In physics, the fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces, are the interactions that do not appear to be reducible to more basic interactions. There are four {{w|fundamental interactions}} known to exist: the {{w|gravity|gravitational}} and {{w|electromagnetism|electromagnetic}} interactions, which produce significant long-range forces whose effects can be seen directly in everyday life, and the {{w|strong interaction|strong}} and {{w|weak interactions|weak}} interactions, which produce forces at minuscule, subatomic distances and govern nuclear interactions. Some scientists speculate that a fifth force might exist, but, if so, it is not widely accepted nor proven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic lists five physical forces (it split up electricity and magnetism), but also includes a number of other things (two countries and three businesses) that are known for &amp;quot;unifying&amp;quot; in a non-physics sense. {{w|East Germany|East}} and {{w|West Germany}} {{w|German reunification|united politically in 1990}}, more than forty years after being divided at the end of {{w|World War II}}. Entertainment company {{w|Disney}} has united in a business sense with a number of others over the years; the comic mentions animation studio {{w|Pixar}} and the ''{{w|Star Wars}}'' franchise. The comic states that this is the progress toward unifying the fundamental forces of nature, which is absurd, with the addition of Disney and {{w|Germany}}, both which are not one of the fundamental forces.{{Citation needed}} Star Wars is, of course, all about {{w|The Force (Star Wars)|The Force}}, but this has, for some reason, gone unnoticed by most physicists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text jokes that some physicist tried to unify the force of {{w|gravity}} with the 2013 movie ''{{w|Gravity (2013 film)|Gravity}}'', starring {{w|Sandra Bullock}}. Of course, this is also absurd, but it turns out that this is just another jab by [[Randall]] at {{w|George Lucas}} for selling his rights to ''{{w|Star Wars}}'' to {{w|Disney}}. The jab comes when he makes it clear that the director of ''Gravity'' {{w|Alfonso Cuarón}} would refuse to sell the rights to his film to Disney, even if he was held in underground chamber of water for 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This water chamber and incredible time span is a reference to {{w|Proton decay}}, which is being investigated by trying to detect the {{w|Cherenkov radiation}} that could occur from possible decay of protons in water. These measurements are being conducted in {{w|Proton_decay#Experimental_evidence|immense water tanks}} buried under mountains to protect them against similar signals that could result from cosmic radiation. The same type of tanks have been used to detect {{w|neutrinos}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The half life of protons is currently believed to be between 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;36&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years. This should be compared to the age of the universe at around 1.3 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; years, which means that one second compared to the age of the universe is larger than the smallest suggested half life of the proton (as used in the comic) compared to the age of the universe, by a factor of about 10,000, but even this time would not make Cuarón cave in...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unifications===&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Item&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unifications&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Electricity&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Electricity and magnetism were historically considered separate forces. Observations through the 19th century indicated that the two were closely linked, however, and the work of James Clerk Maxwell finally established their common identity in 1873. Today, their unified explanation, {{w|electromagnetism}}, is considered one of the four fundamental interactions in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The unification of electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force—known as the {{w|electroweak interaction}}—is the only currently-accepted unification of two fundamental forces. Two Nobel Prizes in Physics have been awarded for work on this unification, in 1979 and in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Weak force&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Strong force&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|The strong nuclear force is similar to the electroweak forces, as they are all part of the model known as {{w|quantum field theory}} (QFT). There have been attempts to unify them to produce a so-called {{w|Grand Unified Theory}}. No model of their unification has yet been shown to be correct, and it remains a major unsolved problem in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Gravity&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unlike the other three fundamental forces, gravity is not described by QFT, but by {{w|general relativity}} (GR). A so-called &amp;quot;{{w|Theory of Everything}}&amp;quot;, describing both QFT and GR, could also unify gravity and the other forces. Such a unification is still strictly hypothetical, however.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!East Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|In 1945, after Nazi Germany's defeat in the Second World War, Germany was occupied by the Allied Forces. At first, it was expected that the whole country would be transitioned to a single post-war government, but but political and ideological differences between the Soviet Union and the other allies (which developed into the Cold War) prevented this. The Soviet-controlled zone became the German Democratic Republic, or {{w|East Germany}}, while the British, American and French zones of control merged to form the Federal Republic of Germany, or {{w|West Germany}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the fall of the Berlin Wall (a physical and symbolic representation of the division) in 1989, and the fall of the East German socialist government in the &amp;quot;Peaceful Revolution&amp;quot;, {{w|German reunification}} again became an immediate possibility. By late 1990, the merger was achieved, with East Germany joining the federal structure already existing in West Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!West Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Pixar was originally a part of the computer division of Lucasfilm, but was spun off into a separate business in 1986. The studio had a positive partnership with Walt Disney Animation, which resulted in a deal for Pixar to produce animated feature films for Walt Disney Pictures. Though the partnership later became strained, Disney agreed to buy Pixar in 2006. Pixar films produced after this acquisition have been branded &amp;quot;Disney-Pixar&amp;quot; films.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The Star Wars franchise was perhaps the most successful and best-known property of Lucasfilm, the company founded by George Lucas in 1971. Discussion in 2011 of a distribution deal with Disney, around the time that Lucas was planning his retirement, turned into the outright purchase of Lucasfilm by Disney in 2012. Since then, Disney has extensively revamped and developed the Star Wars franchise, with three new films and a television series released by the date of this comic, and several more in the works.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Pixar&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Star Wars&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ten rounded frames with text inside are shown in two rows. Below each frame there is a line going down and then this line either joins with one or two of the other frames lines or in two cases do not joins with any other. At the bottom of the panel the now five remaining lines turn towards the center of the bottom of the panel and ends in arrows that points towards three question marks. The first three frames' lines are unified, same goes for the next two, and the three after that. The lines of the last two are not joined with any other lines. The text in the transcript is given as it appears from left to right, disregarding if it is the top or bottom row, but this will alternate through the ten frames, starting with one up, then one down etc.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group one, starting with up:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Electricity&lt;br /&gt;
:Magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
:Weak force&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group two starting with down:]&lt;br /&gt;
:East Germany&lt;br /&gt;
:West Germany&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Group three starting with down:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Star Wars&lt;br /&gt;
:Disney&lt;br /&gt;
:Pixar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two single frames, the first is up:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Strong force&lt;br /&gt;
:Gravity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[All five arrows points to this:]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;???&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Progress toward unifying the fundamental forces of nature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Star Wars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fiction]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geography]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152576</id>
		<title>1956: Unification</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1956:_Unification&amp;diff=152576"/>
				<updated>2018-02-16T13:17:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ 1990-10-03, to be precise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1956&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 16, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Unification&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = unification.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = For a while, some physicists worked on a theory unifying the other forces with both the force of gravity and the film &amp;quot;Gravity,&amp;quot; but even after Alfonso Cuarón was held in a deep underground chamber of water for 10^31 years he refused to sell his film to Disney.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by JAMES MARSH - Needs links and expansion. Explain the title text.  Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In physics, the fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces, are the interactions that do not appear to be reducible to more basic interactions. There are four fundamental interactions known to exist: the gravitational and electromagnetic interactions, which produce significant long-range forces whose effects can be seen directly in everyday life, and the strong and weak interactions, which produce forces at minuscule, subatomic distances and govern nuclear interactions. Some scientists speculate that a fifth force might exist but if so, it is not widely accepted nor proven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic lists five physical forces, but also includes a number of other things (two countries and three businesses) that are known for &amp;quot;unifying&amp;quot; in a non-physics sense. East and West Germany united politically in 1990, more than forty years after being divided at the end of World War II. Entertainment company Disney has united in a business sense with a number of others over the years; the comic mentions animation studio Pixar and the Star Wars franchise. The comic states that this is the progress toward unifying the fundamental forces of nature, which is absurd, with the addition of Disney and Germany, both which are not one of the fundamental forces.{{Citation needed}} Star Wars is, of course, all about The Force, but this has, for some reason, gone unnoticed by most physicists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unifications===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Item&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unifications&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Electricity&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Electricity and magnetism were historically considered separate forces. Observations through the 19th century indicated that the two were closely linked, however, and the work of James Clerk Maxwell finally established their common identity in 1873. Today, their unified explanation, {{w|electromagnetism}}, is considered one of the four fundamental interactions in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The unification of electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force—known as the {{w|electroweak interaction}}—is the only currently-accepted unification of two fundamental forces. Two Nobel Prizes in Physics have been awarded for work on this unification, in 1979 and in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Weak force&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Strong force&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|The strong nuclear force is similar to the electroweak forces, as they are all part of the model known as {{w|quantum field theory}} (QFT). There have been attempts to unify them to produce a so-called {{w|Grand Unified Theory}}. No model of their unification has yet been shown to be correct, and it remains a major unsolved problem in physics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Gravity&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Unlike the other three fundamental forces, gravity is not described by QFT, but by {{w|general relativity}} (GR). A so-called &amp;quot;{{w|Theory of Everything}}&amp;quot;, describing both QFT and GR, could also unify gravity and the other forces. Such a unification is still strictly hypothetical, however.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!East Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|In 1945, after Nazi Germany's defeat in the Second World War, Germany was occupied by the Allied Forces. At first, it was expected that the whole country would be transitioned to a single post-war government, but but political and ideological differences between the Soviet Union and the other allies (which developed into the Cold War) prevented this. The Soviet-controlled zone became the country of East Germany, while the British, American and French zones of control merged to form West Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the fall of the Berlin Wall (a physical and symbolic representation of the division) in 1989, and the fall of the East German socialist government in the &amp;quot;Peaceful Revolution&amp;quot;, {{w|German reunification}} again became an immediate possibility. By late 1990, the merger was achieved, with East Germany joining the federal structure already existing in West Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!West Germany&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Disney&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Pixar was originally a part of the computer division of Lucasfilm, but was spun off into a separate business in 1986. The studio had a positive partnership with Walt Disney Animation, which resulted in a deal for Pixar to produce animated feature films for Walt Disney Pictures. Though the partnership later became strained, Disney agreed to buy Pixar in 2006. Pixar films produced after this acquisition have been branded &amp;quot;Disney-Pixar&amp;quot; films.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|The Star Wars franchise was perhaps the most successful and best-known property of Lucasfilm, the company founded by George Lucas in 1971. Discussion in 2011 of a distribution deal with Disney, around the time that Lucas was planning his retirement, turned into the outright purchase of Lucasfilm by Disney in 2012. Since then, Disney has extensively revamped and developed the Star Wars franchise, with three new films and a television series released by the date of this comic, and several more in the works.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Pixar&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Star Wars&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot;|→&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=849:_Complex_Conjugate&amp;diff=151844</id>
		<title>849: Complex Conjugate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=849:_Complex_Conjugate&amp;diff=151844"/>
				<updated>2018-02-02T22:45:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ More math. I hope it's right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 849&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 19th, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Complex Conjugate&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = complex_conjugate.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Fun fact: if you say this every time a professor does something to a complex-number equation that drops the imaginary part, they'll eventually move the class to another room and tell everyone else except you.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a joke on the common phrase &amp;quot;Shit just got ''real''&amp;quot;, meaning that something has suddenly increased in difficulty so it is now a real challenge. [[Cueball]] is standing in front of a board delivering a lesson, and is about to multiply a wavefunction by its complex conjugate. In mathematics, a complex number has a real part (a) and an imaginary part (b*the {{w|imaginary unit}}). The number can be written as a+b{{i}}. The complex conjugate of a number (a+b{{i}}) is a–b{{i}}. When one multiplies a complex number and its conjugate, the result is (a+b{{i}})(a–b{{i}}), which is a&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;–(b{{i}})&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = a&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;–b&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;{{i}}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The imaginary unit {{i}} is defined as &amp;quot;the square root of –1&amp;quot;, hence {{i}}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;=–1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This process yields a result (of a&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;+b&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) that does not have an imaginary part, making it a ''real'' number, which is a play on the aforementioned phrase. Accordingly, Cueball dictates that the people who are not skilled enough should leave.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text states that if you joke about this every time it's applicable, that will be annoying enough that the class will ditch you and attempt to take place in another room.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing at a whiteboard covered in equations, one of which is the time dependent Schrodinger equation.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Okay, anyone who's feeling like they can't handle the physics here should probably just leave now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Because I'm multiplying the wavefunction by its complex conjugate.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: That's right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Dramatic zoom. It appears Cueball is writing on the side of the panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Shit just got ''real''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fun fact]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1950:_Chicken_Pox_and_Name_Statistics&amp;diff=151841</id>
		<title>1950: Chicken Pox and Name Statistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1950:_Chicken_Pox_and_Name_Statistics&amp;diff=151841"/>
				<updated>2018-02-02T22:21:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 2, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Chicken Pox and Name Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = chicken_pox_and_name_statistics.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = People with all six of those names agree that it's weird that we have teeth, when you think about it for too long. Just about everyone agrees on that, except&amp;amp;mdash;in a still-unexplained statistical anomaly&amp;amp;mdash;people named &amp;quot;Trevor.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a TREVOR WITH NO TEETH - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic jokes that, because the relative frequency with which newborn children are given certain names has changed (as it always does) over the 23 years since the introduction of the chicken pox vaccine, people with names that were popular before the vaccine was developed are more likely to think that chicken pox is normal while others – whose age group have mostly received the vaccine – don't. This comic is a [[:Category:Fun fact|Fun Fact]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic is divided into three vertical frames, and a caption.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the first panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fraction of kids your age who got chicken pox&lt;br /&gt;
:(Very rough US estimates based on DOI:10:15585/mmwr.mm6534a4 and DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.050)&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown with the y-axis ranging from 0 to 100% and the x-axis labeled &amp;quot;Your age:&amp;quot; ranging from 5 to 35. The percentage is close to 0 for ages below 15 and close to 100 for ages above 30.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arrow pointing at the graph:] &lt;br /&gt;
:Vaccine introduced in 1995&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the second panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Relative popularity of several names in your age group&lt;br /&gt;
:(Source: ssa.gov)&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown with the x-axis labeled &amp;quot;Your age:&amp;quot; ranging from 5 to 35. The graph lists Harper, Sarah, Jaxon, Brian, Brooklyn and Logan. Sarah and Brian are more popular names for older age groups.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the third panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Chicken pox incidence by name:&lt;br /&gt;
:(Very rough estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Brian: 75%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sarah: 50%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Logan: 20%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Brooklyn: 10%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Jaxon: 4%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Harper: 2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panels:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fun Fact: People named &amp;quot;Sarah&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Brian&amp;quot; think chicken pox is normal and common, and people named &amp;quot;Logan&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Harper&amp;quot; do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fun fact]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1950:_Chicken_Pox_and_Name_Statistics&amp;diff=151839</id>
		<title>1950: Chicken Pox and Name Statistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1950:_Chicken_Pox_and_Name_Statistics&amp;diff=151839"/>
				<updated>2018-02-02T22:17:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 2, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Chicken Pox and Name Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = chicken_pox_and_name_statistics.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = People with all six of those names agree that it's weird that we have teeth, when you think about it for too long. Just about everyone agrees on that, except&amp;amp;mdash;in a still-unexplained statistical anomaly&amp;amp;mdash;people named &amp;quot;Trevor.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a TREVOR WITH NO TEETH - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic jokes that, because the relative frequency with which newborn children are given certain names has changed (as it always does) over the 23 years since the introduction of the chicken pox vaccine, people with some names are more likely to think that chicken pox is normal while others don't. This comic is a [[:Category:Fun fact|Fun Fact]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic is divided into three vertical frames, and a caption.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the first panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fraction of kids your age who got chicken pox&lt;br /&gt;
:(Very rough US estimates based on DOI:10:15585/mmwr.mm6534a4 and DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.050)&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown with the y-axis ranging from 0 to 100% and the x-axis labeled &amp;quot;Your age:&amp;quot; ranging from 5 to 35. The percentage is close to 0 for ages below 15 and close to 100 for ages above 30.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arrow pointing at the graph:] &lt;br /&gt;
:Vaccine introduced in 1995&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the second panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Relative popularity of several names in your age group&lt;br /&gt;
:(Source: ssa.gov)&lt;br /&gt;
:[A graph is shown with the x-axis labeled &amp;quot;Your age:&amp;quot; ranging from 5 to 35. The graph lists Harper, Sarah, Jaxon, Brian, Brooklyn and Logan. Sarah and Brian are more popular names for older age groups.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Title of the third panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Chicken pox incidence by name:&lt;br /&gt;
:(Very rough estimate)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Brian: 75%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sarah: 50%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Logan: 20%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Brooklyn: 10%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Jaxon: 4%&lt;br /&gt;
:: Harper: 2%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panels:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Fun Fact: People named &amp;quot;Sarah&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Brian&amp;quot; think chicken pox is normal and common, and people named &amp;quot;Logan&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Harper&amp;quot; do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fun fact]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1897:_Self_Driving&amp;diff=149091</id>
		<title>1897: Self Driving</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1897:_Self_Driving&amp;diff=149091"/>
				<updated>2017-12-12T06:21:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1897&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 2, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Self Driving&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = self_driving.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = &amp;quot;Crowdsourced steering&amp;quot; doesn't sound quite as appealing as &amp;quot;self driving.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic references the approach of using {{w|CAPTCHA}}&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; input to solve problems, particularly those involving image classification, which are not solvable by computers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an approach can serve to create the learning set as the basis for training an {{w|artificial intelligence}} (AI) to better recognize or respond to similar stimuli. This approach was used by Google to identify house numbers for Google Street View, and nowadays Google also uses CAPTCHAs to identify street signs and objects in pictures. This might be a reasonable way to help improve the performance of the AI in a self-driving car that responds to video input, by reviewing images it might encounter and flagging road signs, etc. that it should respond to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the temptation might be to simply sidestep the hard problem of AI by having all instances 'solved' by &amp;quot;offloading [the] work onto random strangers&amp;quot; through CAPTCHAs.  For example, this has been used to defeat CAPTCHAs themselves; people were asked to solve CAPTCHAs to unlock pornographic images in a computer game, while the solution for the CAPTCHA was relayed to a server belonging to cybercriminals. (See [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7067962.stm PC stripper helps spam to spread] and [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(08)70036-9 Humans + porn = solved Captcha]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alarmingly, the developers of this '{{w|Self-driving car|self driving}}' car seem to have gone for the lazy approach.  Instead of teaching an AI, the CAPTCHA answer is used in real time to check whether the &amp;quot;self-driving&amp;quot; car is about to arrive at an intersection with a stop sign. This information is pretty critical, as failing to mark the stop could cause an accident. The user is unlikely to respond to the CAPTCHA in time to avert disaster, not to mention that any interruption to the car's internet connection could prove fatal. [[:Category:Self-driving cars|Self driving cars]] has become a recurrent theme on xkcd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The system depicted is a {{w|Wizard of Oz experiment}} (as is the &amp;quot;Mechanical Turk&amp;quot; which a popular crowdworking system is named after) whereas actual self-driving cars, to the extent that they can use (Re-) CAPTCHA-style human detection systems, would involve an asynchronous decision system. Other synchronous decision systems which actually exist are political voting and money as a token of the exchange value of trade. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text explains that this method could be called &amp;quot;crowdsourced steering&amp;quot;, {{w|crowdsourcing}} meaning sending the data on the internet to let several users provide their ideas and input on a problem. People would naturally suspect that this is considerably less safe than a car which is actually capable of self-driving; if the internet can barely [[1333: First Date|collectively steer a videogame character]], what chance do they have steering an actual, physical vehicle?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also suggests that [[Randall]] is a bit skeptical of the current stage of AI, as this doubts whether the AI technology really is working in the way that we expect. It also comments on how what we call 'progress' actually is putting our work onto other people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Inside a frame there is the following text above an image:]&lt;br /&gt;
:To complete your registration, please tell us whether or not this image contains a stop sign:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The square image is a drawing of a road leading up to a sign post with a hard to read word at the top part of the eight-sided sign. The sign also has two smaller signs left and right with unreadable text. The image is of poor quality, but trees and other obstacles next to the road can be seen. Darkness around the edges of the image could indicate that it is night and the landscape is only lit up by a cars head lights.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Sign: Stop&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beneath the image there are two large gray buttons with a word in each:]&lt;br /&gt;
:No Yes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beneath the buttons are the following text:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Answer quickly – our self-driving car is almost at the intersection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption beneath the frame:]&lt;br /&gt;
:So much of &amp;quot;AI&amp;quot; is just figuring out way to offload work onto random strangers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Self-driving cars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1879:_Eclipse_Birds&amp;diff=144375</id>
		<title>Talk:1879: Eclipse Birds</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1879:_Eclipse_Birds&amp;diff=144375"/>
				<updated>2017-08-22T04:53:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Looks more like Megan is the one being sacrificed to me, instead of a generic bird - &amp;quot;Put her down!&amp;quot; would be Cueballs line then. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.204|162.158.90.204]] 06:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly that is the joke. Have corrected this --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's strange the shadow is coming from the top and not from one side, isn't ? I would be frightened too... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.88.52|141.101.88.52]] 07:56, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would &amp;quot;Kachunk&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;clank clank clank&amp;quot; be onomatopoeia to describe the moving of the blood cauldron, rather than the bird sound? Or, given that the sounds are shown in the same manner as the rest of the bird noises, could this be the birds deliberately mimicking the sound that moving a cauldron could make?  Or am I just reading in far too much into this, there is no hidden meaning, and I really need to get out more? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150|141.101.107.150]] 11:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think they are preparing weapons. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 04:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why are the &amp;quot;time is upon us&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;blood cauldron&amp;quot; lines labelled as coming from birds? I assumed they were just hysterical people talking from off-panel. --[[User:Flicky|Flicky]] ([[User talk:Flicky|talk]]) 12:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I've changed the transcript. The sound may originate to birds but that's not clearly shown in the picture.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 13:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could it be worth mentioning this comic was released at midnight, before the eclipse?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.215|108.162.246.215]] 13:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was released before midnight! I read it well before midnight yesterday, the day before the eclipse! I think it was closer to 9:00 when it was released. Definitely well before midnight! [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 16:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The comic was released at 04:00 UTC on Monday, 21. August 2017. This is midnight at Randall's home (Massachusetts) and the earliest time new releases do happen. Of course more western it was still Sunday. Measured in UTC or EDT the release happened on Monday. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am surprised Randall did not do something animated and/or interactive for such a unique event.  Anyone agree? '''--BigMal''' // [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.52|162.158.75.52]] 19:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aztecs were obviously professionals - that explains how they managed to execute someone before the eclipse ended. I think the birds won't be quick enough. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 22:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141769</id>
		<title>Talk:1854: Refresh Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141769"/>
				<updated>2017-06-23T18:49:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and not delete this comment.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to [https://xkcd.com/1638/ this comic]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.83|108.162.212.83]] 14:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't you supposed to use Shift-F5 (at least in chrome) for a hard refresh - not Ctrl - F5.  https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/157179?visit_id=1-636338263045956762-2405452703&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rd=2 {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.136}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that's correct. It is likely browser dependent. --[[User:Arccos|Arccos]] ([[User talk:Arccos|talk]]) 15:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Erratum: The middle hard-refresh option is missing something - it lists only modifier keys. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.185|172.68.142.185]] 15:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It appears that the &amp;quot;hard refresh&amp;quot; option is a real option, but that the keyboard shortcuts in the comic may not be correct. The above user's linked material suggests that the keyboard shortcut for a hard refresh, labeled &amp;quot;Reload the current page, ignoring cached content&amp;quot;, is, in Chrome, SHIFT-F5 or CTRL-Shift-R on Windows and APPLE-Shift-R on a keyboard for MacOS. This is in contrast to the comic, which currently lists CTRL-F5, CTRL-Up, and APPLE-UP-R as the shortcuts. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.105|162.158.74.105]] 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's not an &amp;quot;UP,&amp;quot; the symbol ⇧ represents the SHIFT key. Indeed it appears Randall omitted the 'R' inadvertently. [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 15:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall says the keys are examples, meaning some may missing. But for me it looks like the most common shortcuts. Except the hard refresh by pressing CTRL+SHIFT, that's nonsense because a F5 or R should follow. I'm sure we will see a picture update soon. Stay tuned...--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The missile launch keys can be totally identical for the two-man rule to work; the thing is not that they are interchangeable, but that the locks are too far apart for one person to operate both. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 18:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141768</id>
		<title>Talk:1854: Refresh Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141768"/>
				<updated>2017-06-23T18:49:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and not delete this comment.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to [https://xkcd.com/1638/ this comic]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.83|108.162.212.83]] 14:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't you supposed to use Shift-F5 (at least in chrome) for a hard refresh - not Ctrl - F5.  https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/157179?visit_id=1-636338263045956762-2405452703&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rd=2 {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.136}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that's correct. It is likely browser dependent. --[[User:Arccos|Arccos]] ([[User talk:Arccos|talk]]) 15:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Erratum: The middle hard-refresh option is missing something - it lists only modifier keys. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.185|172.68.142.185]] 15:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It appears that the &amp;quot;hard refresh&amp;quot; option is a real option, but that the keyboard shortcuts in the comic may not be correct. The above user's linked material suggests that the keyboard shortcut for a hard refresh, labeled &amp;quot;Reload the current page, ignoring cached content&amp;quot;, is, in Chrome, SHIFT-F5 or CTRL-Shift-R on Windows and APPLE-Shift-R on a keyboard for MacOS. This is in contrast to the comic, which currently lists CTRL-F5, CTRL-Up, and APPLE-UP-R as the shortcuts. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.105|162.158.74.105]] 15:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's not an &amp;quot;UP,&amp;quot; the symbol ⇧ represents the SHIFT key. Indeed it appears Randall omitted the 'R' inadvertently. [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 15:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall says the keys are examples, meaning some may missing. But for me it looks like the most common shortcuts. Except the hard refresh by pressing CTRL+SHIFT, that's nonsense because a F5 or R should follow. I'm sure we will see a picture update soon. Stay tuned...--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The missile launch keys can be totally identical for the two-man rule to work; the thing is not that they are interchangeable, but that the locks are too far apart for one person to operate both.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141767</id>
		<title>1854: Refresh Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141767"/>
				<updated>2017-06-23T18:48:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: It's not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1854&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 23, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Refresh Types&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = refresh_types.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The hardest refresh requires both a Mac keyboard and a Windows keyboard as a security measure, like how missile launch systems require two keys to be turned at once.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This is chaos - multiple explanations should be merged and condensed. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Comic lists five different levels of refresh operations for web applications. The first three (soft, normal, and hard refresh) are different operations done in the browser to request that information be retrieved from the server. The other two (harder and hardest refresh) are further, imaginary operations that perform &amp;quot;refresh&amp;quot; operations on remote resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soft refresh refers to an operation in a web page that requests new information without reloading the page. The given example, Gmail, includes a feature that allows users to pull down new emails without reloading the inbox interface. It is a command given to the web page, rather than to the browser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;quot;normal refresh&amp;quot; is a browser operation that reloads portions of a web page that have changed since the original load. It is the refresh operation triggered by refresh buttons in browsers, and will generally accomplish the same thing as a soft refresh, with the additional cost of reloading the web page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hard refresh is a less common browser operation that clears any cached files associated with the page before requesting a new copy. Browser caching is a way to store webpage resources locally in order to decrease load time and data transmitted. Hard refreshes are usually used when a webapp has changed in such a way that the cached data is interfering with the proper display of the page. A hard refresh is slower because it forces the browser to download the entire page, but it ensures that the page is displayed as it is currently being served.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Harder refresh&amp;quot; is a joke that extends the existing naming scheme. The joke is that if a &amp;quot;hard refresh&amp;quot; resets the browser display and cache, a harder refresh should reset the source of the data by cycling power in the data center. Assuming no damage was done, this would reset the memory on the server, erasing any information that had not been written to disk, and setting the server to the state it was in at launch. This would cause considerable downtime, and would be unlikely to help the user at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth option, &amp;quot;hardest refresh&amp;quot;, moves beyond resetting the source of the data and resets the entire internet back to ARPANET, an early military network which was a forerunner to the modern internet. The implications of this are not made clear, but it should be noted that it wouldn't help to fix any problems a user is experiencing in-browser, as HTTP, the protocol by which web pages are sent, was not developed until late 1990, the year ARPANET was decommissioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Keyboard shortcuts listed for the three real actions are, in fact, standard shortcuts. shortcuts tend to be longer and more complicated for less common operations, and the fake shortcuts play to this idea. The &amp;quot;harder refresh&amp;quot; uses six keys, including the non-standard '[https://askubuntu.com/questions/19558/what-are-the-meta-super-and-hyper-keys HYPER]' key, a feature of the {{w|Space cadet keyboard}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;hardest refresh&amp;quot; shortcut uses fifteen keys, including non-standard ones such as Ø and ⏏. (The latter is the &amp;quot;eject&amp;quot; key found on [older?] Mac keyboards.) The shortcut makes amusing comparisons about a shortcut that includes not only the F5 function key, but also the keys for the letter &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; and the digit &amp;quot;5&amp;quot;, as well as the similarity in appearance between O, 0, and Ø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text suggests that the inclusion of both the windows key and command key in the &amp;quot;Hardest refresh&amp;quot; shortcut is a security measure akin to the {{w|Two-man rule}}, as it would require two keyboards to enter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon. No table is the preferred version, just describe what's in the picture including the special keys.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Refresh Type&lt;br /&gt;
! Example Shortcuts&lt;br /&gt;
! Effect&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Soft Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| Gmail &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;REFRESH&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Button &lt;br /&gt;
| Requests update within Javascript&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| F5, CTRL-R,  &amp;amp;#x2318;-R&lt;br /&gt;
 |Refreshes page&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hard Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| CTRL-F5, CTRL-&amp;amp;#x21E7;,  &amp;amp;#x2318;-&amp;amp;#x21E7;-R &lt;br /&gt;
| Refreshes page including cached files&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harder Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| CTRL-&amp;amp;#x21E7;-HYPER-ESC-R-F5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Remotely cycles power to datacenter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hardest Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
|CTRL- &amp;amp;#x2318;&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;Windows key logo&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#x229E;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#x21E7;#-R-F5-F-5-ESC-O-0-Ø-&amp;amp;#x23CF;-SCROLL LOCK &lt;br /&gt;
|Internet starts over from Arpanet&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141766</id>
		<title>1854: Refresh Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1854:_Refresh_Types&amp;diff=141766"/>
				<updated>2017-06-23T18:47:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: F5&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1854&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 23, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Refresh Types&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = refresh_types.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The hardest refresh requires both a Mac keyboard and a Windows keyboard as a security measure, like how missile launch systems require two keys to be turned at once.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This is chaos - multiple explanations should be merged and condensed. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Comic lists five different levels of refresh operations for web applications. The first three (soft, normal, and hard refresh) are different operations done in the browser to request that information be retrieved from the server. The other two (harder and hardest refresh) are further, imaginary operations that perform &amp;quot;refresh&amp;quot; operations on remote resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soft refresh refers to an operation in a web page that requests new information without reloading the page. The given example, Gmail, includes a feature that allows users to pull down new emails without reloading the inbox interface. It is a command given to the web page, rather than to the browser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;quot;normal refresh&amp;quot; is a browser operation that reloads portions of a web page that have changed since the original load. It is the refresh operation triggered by refresh buttons in browsers, and will generally accomplish the same thing as a soft refresh, with the additional cost of reloading the web page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hard refresh is a less common browser operation that clears any cached files associated with the page before requesting a new copy. Browser caching is a way to store webpage resources locally in order to decrease load time and data transmitted. Hard refreshes are usually used when a webapp has changed in such a way that the cached data is interfering with the proper display of the page. A hard refresh is slower because it forces the browser to download the entire page, but it ensures that the page is displayed as it is currently being served.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Harder refresh&amp;quot; is a joke that extends the existing naming scheme. The joke is that if a &amp;quot;hard refresh&amp;quot; resets the browser display and cache, a harder refresh should reset the source of the data by cycling power in the data center. Assuming no damage was done, this would reset the memory on the server, erasing any information that had not been written to disk, and setting the server to the state it was in at launch. This would cause considerable downtime, and would be unlikely to help the user at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth option, &amp;quot;hardest refresh&amp;quot;, moves beyond resetting the source of the data and resets the entire internet back to ARPANET, an early military network which was a forerunner to the modern internet. The implications of this are not made clear, but it should be noted that it wouldn't help to fix any problems a user is experiencing in-browser, as HTTP, the protocol by which web pages are sent, was not developed until late 1990, the year ARPANET was decommissioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Keyboard shortcuts listed for the three real actions are, in fact, standard shortcuts. shortcuts tend to be longer and more complicated for less common operations, and the fake shortcuts play to this idea. The &amp;quot;harder refresh&amp;quot; uses six keys, including the non-standard '[https://askubuntu.com/questions/19558/what-are-the-meta-super-and-hyper-keys HYPER]' key, a feature of the {{w|Space cadet keyboard}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;hardest refresh&amp;quot; shortcut uses fifteen keys, including non-standard ones such as Ø and ⏏. (The latter is the &amp;quot;eject&amp;quot; key found on [older?] Mac keyboards.) The shortcut makes amusing comparisons about a shortcut that includes not only the F5 function key, but also the keys for the letter &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; and the digit &amp;quot;5&amp;quot;, as well as the similarity in appearance between O, 0, and Ø.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text suggests that the inclusion of both the windows key and command key in the &amp;quot;Hardest refresh&amp;quot; shortcut is a security measure akin to the {{w|Two-man rule}}, as it would require two keyboards to enter. This may be something of a joke in-and-of-itself, as the two keys are actually problematically identical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon. No table is the preferred version, just describe what's in the picture including the special keys.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Refresh Type&lt;br /&gt;
! Example Shortcuts&lt;br /&gt;
! Effect&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Soft Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| Gmail &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;REFRESH&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Button &lt;br /&gt;
| Requests update within Javascript&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| F5, CTRL-R,  &amp;amp;#x2318;-R&lt;br /&gt;
 |Refreshes page&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hard Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| CTRL-F5, CTRL-&amp;amp;#x21E7;,  &amp;amp;#x2318;-&amp;amp;#x21E7;-R &lt;br /&gt;
| Refreshes page including cached files&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harder Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
| CTRL-&amp;amp;#x21E7;-HYPER-ESC-R-F5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Remotely cycles power to datacenter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hardest Refresh &lt;br /&gt;
|CTRL- &amp;amp;#x2318;&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;Windows key logo&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#x229E;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#x21E7;#-R-F5-F-5-ESC-O-0-Ø-&amp;amp;#x23CF;-SCROLL LOCK &lt;br /&gt;
|Internet starts over from Arpanet&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141352</id>
		<title>Talk:1850: Air Force Museum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141352"/>
				<updated>2017-06-14T18:43:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I hear if you have a basic understanding of computer systems and know a reservist Colonel, you can hack into the flight schedule, reserve two fighters fully loaded down with as much ordinance as they can carry, and go on a rescue mission to save your father who was shot down in disputed airspace. [[User:OldCorps|OldCorps]] ([[User talk:OldCorps|talk]]) 18:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What movie is that? (... at least, I ''hope'' it is a movie.) [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 18:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141350</id>
		<title>1850: Air Force Museum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141350"/>
				<updated>2017-06-14T18:40:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1850&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 14, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Air Force Museum&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = air_force_museum.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I had fun visiting the museum at Dover Air Force Base, unless they don't have a museum, in which case I've never been to Delaware in my life.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete| Perhaps more detail is needed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] asks [[Cueball]] about his day. He tells about his visit to a military {{w|Aviation museum|aircraft museum}} at the {{w|Military air base|air force base}} and lists some of the things he saw. It starts with things you would expect at a typical museum, such as a mix of modern, older, and even older aircraft, before revealing the fact that Cueball was able to watch missiles being loaded, which is something that would be extremely out of place and dangerous at a museum. Realizing this, Cueball remarks that he hopes that he was at a museum, and Megan asks him if he hears helicopters. The implication is that there was no museum to begin with and Cueball went to observe the actual air force base and is now being pursued by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mention of &amp;quot;planes from different eras&amp;quot; alludes to the fact that military aircraft are often still in use after a much longer time than they were originally designed for. Examples of this are the US Air Force's B-52 bomber, first introduced in 1955 (62 years before the publication of this comic) and the C-160 Transall, which has been in service in, e.g., the German Luftwaffe, since 1967 (50 years before).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text builds on this premise. Cueball says that he had fun visiting another Air Force &amp;quot;museum&amp;quot;, but he adds that if they don't have a museum (in which case he was trespassing on a military base) then he denies going anywhere near it. Fortunately for Cueball, there is in fact an Air Force museum nearby: the {{w|Air Mobility Command Museum}} about half a mile south of the {{w|Dover Air Force Base}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan walks from left over to Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How was your day?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I visited the military aircraft museum over at the Air Force base. It was really neat!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both walking together to the right.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: They have planes from different eras, all kinds of cool equipment, and you can even watch missiles being loaded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both walking while they contemplate.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both still walking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ...at least, I ''hope'' that was a museum.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Do you hear helicopters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141349</id>
		<title>1850: Air Force Museum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1850:_Air_Force_Museum&amp;diff=141349"/>
				<updated>2017-06-14T18:39:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ Old planes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1850&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 14, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Air Force Museum&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = air_force_museum.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I had fun visiting the museum at Dover Air Force Base, unless they don't have a museum, in which case I've never been to Delaware in my life.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete| Perhaps more detail is needed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] asks [[Cueball]] about his day. He tells about his visit to a military {{w|Aviation museum|aircraft museum}} at the {{w|Military air base|air force base}} and lists some of the things he saw. It starts with things you would expect at a typical museum, such as a mix of modern, older, and even older aircraft, before revealing the fact that Cueball was able to watch missiles being loaded, which is something that would be extremely out of place and dangerous at a museum. Realizing this, Cueball remarks that he hopes that he was at a museum, and Megan asks him if he hears helicopters. The implication is that there was no museum to begin with and Cueball went to observe the actual air force base and is now being pursued by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mention of &amp;quot;planes from different eras&amp;quot; alludes to the fact that military aircraft are often still in use after a much longer time than they were originally designed for. Examples of this are the US Air Force's B-52 bomber, first introduced in 1955 (62 years before the publication of this comic) and the C-160 Transall of the German Luftwaffe, which has been in service since 1967 (50 years before).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text builds on this premise. Cueball says that he had fun visiting another Air Force &amp;quot;museum&amp;quot;, but he adds that if they don't have a museum (in which case he was trespassing on a military base) then he denies going anywhere near it. Fortunately for Cueball, there is in fact an Air Force museum nearby: the {{w|Air Mobility Command Museum}} about half a mile south of the {{w|Dover Air Force Base}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan walks from left over to Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How was your day?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I visited the military aircraft museum over at the Air Force base. It was really neat!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both walking together to the right.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: They have planes from different eras, all kinds of cool equipment, and you can even watch missiles being loaded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both walking while they contemplate.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both still walking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ...at least, I ''hope'' that was a museum.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Do you hear helicopters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141230</id>
		<title>1849: Decades</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141230"/>
				<updated>2017-06-12T18:58:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ Typo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1849&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 12, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Decades&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = decades.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = In the 90s, our variety radio station used the tagline &amp;quot;the best music of the 70s, 80s, and 90s.&amp;quot; After 2000, they switched to &amp;quot;the best music of the 80s, 90s, and today.&amp;quot; I figured they'd change again in 2010, but it's 2017 and they're still saying &amp;quot;80s, 90s, and today.&amp;quot; I hope radio survives long enough for us to find out how they deal with the 2020s.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic shows, by use on a time-line, an interesting phenomenon where music, fashion, movies and culture created between the years 2000 and 2020 are not commonly grouped into the decade in which they were produced like previous decades. The comic asserts the reason for this is the lack of a single clear term to describe these decades, stating that the term &amp;quot;2000s&amp;quot; is ambiguous (as it could refer to the decade, century or millennium as a whole) and the terms &amp;quot;Aughts&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Teens&amp;quot; never became the widely accepted terms for these decades. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The time-line in the comic stretches into the future (as of the time of publication) and attempts to name the 2020-2029 decade as the 20s, but does so with an uncertain question mark, presumably because it's (presently) an open question whether this dating convention will be reinstated after a 20-year pause. As the comic points out, common vernacular has managed to operate without clear terms for that grouping for 17 years, and that may have left enough of a mark on our thinking that we'll simply continue to operate in that way. There's an argument to be made grouping culture by decades is fairly arbitrary and not essential in cultural discussions. It should also be considered that that &amp;quot;the twenties&amp;quot; is still occasionally used to refer to the 1920's, and so reusing it to refer to the 2020's could be a source of confusion. It's not impossible that decade-based grouping will fall out of favor all together in the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite many people pushing for terms like &amp;quot;aughties&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;tens&amp;quot;, they never gained much traction among the common crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[A time line across the top of the box marks decades from 1960-2030, and labels inserted under this between the ticks marking each decade describe the following groups]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1960-1970;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
60s Music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
60s Fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
60s Movies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
60s Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1970-1980;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
70s Music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
70s Fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
70s Movies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
70s Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1980-1990;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
80s Music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
80s Fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
80s Movies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
80s Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1990-2000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
90s Music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
90s Fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
90s Movies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
90s Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000-2020;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Sporadically Placed over 2 decades]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Culture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Music&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Movies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2020-2030;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[In light grey font]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20s Music?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20s Fashion?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20s Movies?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20s Culture?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Caption below the panel:] &lt;br /&gt;
It's weird how for 20 years we stopped grouping our cultural memories by decade because &amp;quot;2000s&amp;quot; is ambiguous and and &amp;quot;Aughts&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Teens&amp;quot; never really stuck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1837:_Rental_Car&amp;diff=139838</id>
		<title>1837: Rental Car</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1837:_Rental_Car&amp;diff=139838"/>
				<updated>2017-05-15T11:05:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1837&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 15, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rental Car&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rental_car.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Technically, both cars are haunted, but the murder ghosts can't stand listening to the broken GPS for more than a few minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete| 🚧 🔨}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, the couple wants to rent a car. The rental agency has only two vehicles available:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One puts its occupants into mortal danger; the danger, however, is abstract and befalls only &amp;quot;maybe one in six&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* The other has a defective GPS that incessantly gives instructions to go somewhere the driver usually does not want to go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic suggests that, given the choice between the persistent low-level annoyance of the GPS on one hand, and the (low) probability of being murdered on the other, some people will choose the latter option because, after all, they might survive murderous ghosts but they feel they will not survive long having to listen to the broken GPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the title text, the murderous ghosts only haunt the one car because even they cannot stand the broken GPS for long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A Cueball-like guy standing behind a desk looking at a computer screen services Megan and Cueball on the other side of the desk.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: We have two rental cars left.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: One is the murder car. But don't let the name scare you!&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: It's definitely haunted. But most drivers don't get murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Maybe one in six.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The guy lifts his hand and looks at Megan and Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: The other is a regular Sedan.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: But is has a GPS that's stuck trying to navigate to Seattle.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ...I can ignore it, right? That's fine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In a frame-less panel Megan and Cueball drives in the Sedan.]&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Turn left&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Make a U-Turn&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Turn right&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Make a U-Turn&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball walk back into the the guy behind his desk. Megan holds out the car keys in one hand.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Back already?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: We'll take the murder car.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Popular Choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1837:_Rental_Car&amp;diff=139837</id>
		<title>1837: Rental Car</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1837:_Rental_Car&amp;diff=139837"/>
				<updated>2017-05-15T11:04:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1837&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 15, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rental Car&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rental_car.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Technically, both cars are haunted, but the murder ghosts can't stand listening to the broken GPS for more than a few minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete| 🚧 🔨}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, the couple wants to rent a car. The rental agency has only two vehicles available:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One puts its occupants into mortal danger; the danger, however, is abstract and befalls only &amp;quot;maybe one in six&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* The other has a defective GPS that incessantly gives instructions to go somewhere the driver usually does not want to go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic suggests that, given the choice between the persistent low-level annoyance of the GPS on one hand, and the (low) probability of being murdered on the other, some people will choose the latter option because, after all, they might survive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the title text, the murderous ghosts only haunt the one car because even they cannot stand the broken GPS for long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A Cueball-like guy standing behind a desk looking at a computer screen services Megan and Cueball on the other side of the desk.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: We have two rental cars left.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: One is the murder car. But don't let the name scare you!&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: It's definitely haunted. But most drivers don't get murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Maybe one in six.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The guy lifts his hand and looks at Megan and Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: The other is a regular Sedan.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: But is has a GPS that's stuck trying to navigate to Seattle.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ...I can ignore it, right? That's fine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In a frame-less panel Megan and Cueball drives in the Sedan.]&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Turn left&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Make a U-Turn&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Turn right&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Make a U-Turn&lt;br /&gt;
:GPS: Recalculating&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball walk back into the the guy behind his desk. Megan holds out the car keys in one hand.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Back already?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: We'll take the murder car.&lt;br /&gt;
:Guy: Popular Choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=848:_3D&amp;diff=139486</id>
		<title>848: 3D</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=848:_3D&amp;diff=139486"/>
				<updated>2017-05-02T14:51:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ CERN isn't an acronym today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 848&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 17, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = 3D&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = 3d.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The LINACs in the glasses frames can barely manage one MeV. You should've gone to the screening at CERN.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|String theory}} hypothesizes that there are many more than 3 dimensions, it's just that we can't see the rest because they're &amp;quot;rolled up.&amp;quot; A common metaphor is an ant on a tightrope — it has two degrees of freedom, one along the rope and one around it, but from far away we can only see one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So [[Black Hat]] released his 2D movie about string theory in &amp;quot;3D&amp;quot;, and claimed that the third dimension was there — just too small to see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to {{w|linear particle accelerators}}, or &amp;quot;LINACs,&amp;quot; which are used to create high-energy particles. Incidentally, the glasses give their particles one mega-electronvolt (symbol {{w|MeV}}) of energy, which is not particularly high for a particle accelerator. The title text suggests that such moviegoers should try the accelerators at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, {{w|CERN}}, since they are widely known for producing the highest energies in the millions of MeV, and thus have the best chance of unraveling the small dimensions of string theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[People are lined up to see a movie.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Premiering Tonight:&lt;br /&gt;
:String Theory:&lt;br /&gt;
:An Exposé&lt;br /&gt;
:Presented In 3D!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The people are in a dark theater, fiddling with their glasses.]&lt;br /&gt;
:''???''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The people approach black hat guy, who's sitting at a desk.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Your movie was a ripoff.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: It wasn't 3D at all!&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Was too.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: It's just that the third dimension is tightly rolled up and too small to observe at normal energies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1828:_ISS_Solar_Transit&amp;diff=139218</id>
		<title>1828: ISS Solar Transit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1828:_ISS_Solar_Transit&amp;diff=139218"/>
				<updated>2017-04-25T05:22:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1828&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 24, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = ISS Solar Transit&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = iss_solar_transit.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I guess it's also the right setting for pictures of the Moon at night.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is trying to take a photograph of the {{w|International Space Station}} moving in front of the sun ([https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/international-space-station-transits-the-sun example]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A normal camera is not able to take a photograph of the sun due to the extreme brightness. This is why Cueball is using a {{w|Astronomical_filter|solar filter}}, which makes the sun look orange instead of white.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital cameras need to determine the color temperature of a photograph to correctly display colors. This is done using the {{w|Color_balance|white balance}} setting. The joke here is that Cueball selects the &amp;quot;direct sunlight&amp;quot; option, as he feels it is the option that best suits his unusual situation of directly photographing the sun, even though the &amp;quot;direct sunlight&amp;quot; setting is intended to be used for photographing objects directly illuminated by the sun and not for the sun itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The light that reaches the camera sensor from an object illuminated by &amp;quot;direct sunlight&amp;quot; is, in fact, ''indirect'' sunlight, so when photographing the sun itself, the camera receives sunlight that is even more direct than &amp;quot;direct&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of a solar filter influences the color temperature, so &amp;quot;custom&amp;quot; would probably be the correct option here. A camera using the &amp;quot;custom&amp;quot; option usually requires you to focus on a white or gray object first to determine the correct setting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is pointing out that the sunlit side of the moon is also in direct sunlight, which is why we are able to see it, and so &amp;quot;direct sunlight&amp;quot; would actually be the correct setting in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is kneeling in front of a camera attached to a tripod, standing on a small platform, and angled sharply upward toward the sky.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-screen voice: What's going on?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ISS solar transit. From this spot, the space station should briefly line up with the sun. I got a sun filter and I'm trying to take a picture of it crossing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Image of a very orange sun on a black background, as seen through the camera.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Perfect. Hmm, I should set the white balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[White balance menu is shown with the following options:]&lt;br /&gt;
: - Incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
: - Fluorescent&lt;br /&gt;
: - Direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
: - Flash&lt;br /&gt;
: - Cloudy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Shade&lt;br /&gt;
: - Custom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball pauses to think.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Selects Direct sunlight.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1823:_Hottest_Editors&amp;diff=138646</id>
		<title>1823: Hottest Editors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1823:_Hottest_Editors&amp;diff=138646"/>
				<updated>2017-04-12T16:59:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */ Oops... that's when your fingers do it without conscious thought ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1823&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 12, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Hottest Editors&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = hottest_editors.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Elon Musk finally blocked me from the internal Tesla repository because I wouldn't stop sending pull requests for my code supporting steering via vim keybindings.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Needs explanation of title text.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic has a play on the word 'Editor'. The editors from 1995 to 2000 are plain-text editors, popular among many programmers and other computer scientists to edit machine-readable text.&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the earlier editors, {{w|Vim (text editor)|Vim}} and {{w|Emacs|Emacs}}, allow the user to perform common actions (like scrolling, marking text, saving or searching) using keyboard shortcuts.&lt;br /&gt;
As Vim and Emacs use different shortcuts, someone who is proficient in one editor may have difficulty using the other editor, since the shortcuts are different.&lt;br /&gt;
The 'Editor wars' refer to Vim and Emacs users debating heavily on which of the two editors is the best (for which keyboard shortcuts, or bindings, are just one of the arguments employed).&lt;br /&gt;
Modern editors (including Notepad++ and Sublime Text) mainly use the shortcuts determined the operating system, again different from Vim and Emacs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Notepad++}} is a popular text and source code editor, initially released in 2003. {{w|Sublime Text}} is the current &amp;quot;most popular&amp;quot; text editor according to Randall, released in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2020 editor '{{w|CRISPR}}' is not a text editor, but a technique used to edit DNA. The comic may suggests that we will not be editing digital plain-text files, but DNA in 2020, possibly due to advances in {{w|DNA digital data storage}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make the transition between editors easier, some editors offer Vim or Emacs key-bindings: the shortcuts will be (roughly) the same as in Vim or in Emacs, so that someone who used to be proficient in one of those editors can proceed to use the keyboard shortcuts in the way he or she was used to.&lt;br /&gt;
The comic suggests that in 2025, the Vim key-bindings will be the most popular for editing genes using CRISPR.&lt;br /&gt;
This creates a comical effect: CRISPR is a technique that operates on genes, and not on digital hardware, so it does not use a keyboard per se. Consequently, it is surprising that CRISPR would have key bindings. The comic also suggests that in 2025, Vim will make a comeback in DNA editing, thus having 'won' the battle with Emacs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text says that Randall has been banned from the code base of {{w|Tesla, Inc.|Tesla}}, as he keeps sending {{w|pull request}}s (code changes) to steer a Tesla car using Vim keybindings. Not only does this seem impossible,  but it seems dangerous to steer a car with a (computer) keyboard. The arguably most important keybindings of a text editor are those to move the editing location (the cursor) around. Vim, in addition to dedicated keys present on most keyboards, supports the use of &amp;quot;h&amp;quot; for moving left, &amp;quot;l&amp;quot; for moving right, &amp;quot;j&amp;quot; for down, and &amp;quot;k&amp;quot; for up. To use these in a vehicular context, up and down would probably, as in many racing games, be mapped to acceleration and braking, respectively. One additional problem with using essentially binary inputs (key pressed or not) as a replacement for a car's steering wheel is achieving different degrees of direction change. Pressing, say, the &amp;quot;h&amp;quot; key could either cause the car to turn its wheels left by a pre-set, fixed amount, or it could turn them left the more the longer the key is held down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question is how to map the exit-without-saving and save-then-exit operations of a text editor to a car. It must be assumed that exit-without-save would cause the car to return to the just-finished trip's origin point, while saving the location would let the car remain in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Hottest Editors&lt;br /&gt;
:--------------------&lt;br /&gt;
:1995-2000—[Emacs–Vim Editor war]&lt;br /&gt;
:2005—Vim&lt;br /&gt;
:2010—Notepad++&lt;br /&gt;
:2015—Sublime Text&lt;br /&gt;
:2020—CRISPR&lt;br /&gt;
:2025—CRISPR (Vim keybindings)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1823:_Hottest_Editors&amp;diff=138645</id>
		<title>1823: Hottest Editors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1823:_Hottest_Editors&amp;diff=138645"/>
				<updated>2017-04-12T16:56:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1823&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 12, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Hottest Editors&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = hottest_editors.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Elon Musk finally blocked me from the internal Tesla repository because I wouldn't stop sending pull requests for my code supporting steering via vim keybindings.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Needs explanation of title text.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic has a play on the word 'Editor'. The editors from 1995 to 2000 are plain-text editors, popular among many programmers and other computer scientists to edit machine-readable text.&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the earlier editors, {{w|Vim (text editor)|Vim}} and {{w|Emacs|Emacs}}, allow the user to perform common actions (like scrolling, marking text, saving or searching) using keyboard shortcuts.&lt;br /&gt;
As Vim and Emacs use different shortcuts, someone who is proficient in one editor may have difficulty using the other editor, since the shortcuts are different.&lt;br /&gt;
The 'Editor wars' refer to Vim and Emacs users debating heavily on which of the two editors is the best (for which keyboard shortcuts, or bindings, are just one of the arguments employed).&lt;br /&gt;
Modern editors (including Notepad++ and Sublime Text) mainly use the shortcuts determined the operating system, again different from Vim and Emacs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Notepad++}} is a popular text and source code editor, initially released in 2003. {{w|Sublime Text}} is the current &amp;quot;most popular&amp;quot; text editor according to Randall, released in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2020 editor '{{w|CRISPR}}' is not a text editor, but a technique used to edit DNA. The comic may suggests that we will not be editing digital plain-text files, but DNA in 2020, possibly due to advances in {{w|DNA digital data storage}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make the transition between editors easier, some editors offer Vim or Emacs key-bindings: the shortcuts will be (roughly) the same as in Vim or in Emacs, so that someone who used to be proficient in one of those editors can proceed to use the keyboard shortcuts in the way he or she was used to.&lt;br /&gt;
The comic suggests that in 2025, the Vim key-bindings will be the most popular for editing genes using CRISPR.&lt;br /&gt;
This creates a comical effect: CRISPR is a technique that operates on genes, and not on digital hardware, so it does not use a keyboard per se. Consequently, it is surprising that CRISPR would have key bindings. The comic also suggests that in 2025, Vim will make a comeback in DNA editing, thus having 'won' the battle with Emacs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text says that Randall has been banned from the code base of {{w|Tesla, Inc.|Tesla}}, as he keeps sending {{w|pull request}}s (code changes) to steer a Tesla car using Vim keybindings. Not only does this seem impossible,  but it seems dangerous to steer a car with a (computer) keyboard. The arguably most important keybindings of a text editor are those to move the editing location (the cursor) around. Vim, in addition to dedicated keys present on most keyboards, supports the use of &amp;quot;h&amp;quot; for moving left, &amp;quot;l&amp;quot; for moving right, &amp;quot;j&amp;quot; for up, and &amp;quot;k&amp;quot; for down. To use these in a vehicular context, up and down would probably, as in many racing games, be mapped to acceleration and braking, respectively. One additional problem with using essentially binary inputs (key pressed or not) as a replacement for a car's steering wheel is achieving different degrees of direction change. Pressing, say, the &amp;quot;h&amp;quot; key could either cause the car to turn its wheels left by a pre-set, fixed amount, or it could turn them left the more the longer the key is held down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question is how to map the exit-without-saving and save-then-exit operations of a text editor to a car. It must be assumed that exit-without-save would cause the car to return to the just-finished trip's origin point, while saving the location would let the car remain in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Hottest Editors&lt;br /&gt;
:--------------------&lt;br /&gt;
:1995-2000—[Emacs–Vim Editor war]&lt;br /&gt;
:2005—Vim&lt;br /&gt;
:2010—Notepad++&lt;br /&gt;
:2015—Sublime Text&lt;br /&gt;
:2020—CRISPR&lt;br /&gt;
:2025—CRISPR (Vim keybindings)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1820:_Security_Advice&amp;diff=138340</id>
		<title>1820: Security Advice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1820:_Security_Advice&amp;diff=138340"/>
				<updated>2017-04-05T14:25:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: Revert my own edit; should not have gone into the transcript. Apologies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1820&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 5, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Security Advice&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = security_advice.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Never give your password or bank account number to anyone who doesn't have a blue check mark next to their name.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incoplete. TBD:Add list Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic depicts a conversation between [[Cueball]] and [[Ponytail]], discussing the fact that giving people security advice has failed to improve their internet security, and in some cases even made things worse (such as requiring complicated passwords leading to people leaving post-it notes with their passwords on their screen, leading to huge security risks). As a result Cueball suggests {{w|reverse psychology|giving bad advice instead}}, in hopes of a positive effect. The last panel contains a list these security tips, which are parodies of actual security tips.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last tip on the image is most likely a reference to Ingmar Bergman's film [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seventh_Seal#Synopsis The Seventh Seal].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Starts with: (Print out this list and keep it in your bank safe deposit box.)&lt;br /&gt;
!Security Tip&lt;br /&gt;
!Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't click links to websites&lt;br /&gt;
|The usual tip is &amp;quot;Don't click on ''suspicious'' website links.&amp;quot; The comic's variation instead implies don't click on any links to any websites, or don't use the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Use prime numbers in your password&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Change your password manager monthly&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hold your breath while crossing the border&lt;br /&gt;
|This in its self, wouldn't do anything, but if you hold your breath for too long you could pass out when crossing, or look stressed/suspicious. Overall, this would not help you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Install a secure font&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Use a 2-factor smoke detector&lt;br /&gt;
|A new way to keep accounts secure is 2-factor authentication, which usually means you enter your password, and then look for an email (or go into a mobile app) with a code which you then enter into the website. A 2-factor smoke detector would be useless, because it would require you to verify that there is actually a fire with a code, when the purpose of smoke detectors are to warn you about fires you ''don't'' know about.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Change your maiden name regularly&lt;br /&gt;
|A common security question (a type of 2-factor authentication from the previous tip) asks you for your maiden name.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Put strange USB drives in a bag of rice overnight&lt;br /&gt;
|The usual security tip is &amp;quot;Don't plug strange USB drives into your computer,&amp;quot; because sometimes attackers put viruses that infect your system when plugged in. This tip implies that you should &amp;quot;put USB drives in a bag of rice overnight&amp;quot; which is a common technique for drying out water damaged devices, due to rice's absorbent qualities. This would not clean the drive of viruses, and unless the drive was wet (perhaps because you found it outside due to it being called &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot;) it would not do anything.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Use special characters like &amp;amp; and %&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Only read content published through Tor.com&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Use a burner's phone&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Get an SSL certificate and store it in a safe place&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|If a border guard asks to examine your laptop, you have a legal right to challenge them to a chess game for your soul.&lt;br /&gt;
|This tip is likely a reference to Ingmar Bergman's film [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seventh_Seal#Synopsis The Seventh Seal]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: We've been trying for decades to give people good security advice.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: But in retrospect, lots of the tips actually made things worse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Maybe we should try to give ''bad'' advice?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: I guess it's worth a shot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Security tips&lt;br /&gt;
:(Print out this list and keep it in your bank safe deposit box.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Don't click links to websites&lt;br /&gt;
* Use prime numbers in your password&lt;br /&gt;
* Change your password manager monthly&lt;br /&gt;
* Hold your breath while crossing the border&lt;br /&gt;
* Install a secure font&lt;br /&gt;
* User a 2-factor smoke detector&lt;br /&gt;
* Change your maiden name regularly&lt;br /&gt;
* Put strange USB drives in a bag of rice overnight&lt;br /&gt;
* Use special characters like &amp;amp; and %&lt;br /&gt;
* Only read content published through Tor.com&lt;br /&gt;
* Use a burner's phone&lt;br /&gt;
* Get an SSL certificate and store it in a safe place&lt;br /&gt;
* If a border guard asks to examine your laptop, you have a legal right to challenge them to a chess game for your soul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1820:_Security_Advice&amp;diff=138338</id>
		<title>1820: Security Advice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1820:_Security_Advice&amp;diff=138338"/>
				<updated>2017-04-05T14:22:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Transcript */ What I could think of.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1820&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 5, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Security Advice&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = security_advice.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Never give your password or bank account number to anyone who doesn't have a blue check mark next to their name.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incoplete. TBD:Add list Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic depicts a conversation between [[Cueball]] and [[Ponytail]], discussing the fact that giving people security advice has failed to improve their internet security, and in some cases even made things worse (such as requiring complicated passwords leading to people leaving post-it notes with their passwords on their screen, leading to huge security risks). As a result Cueball suggests {{w|reverse psychology|giving bad advice instead}}, in hopes of a positive effect. The last panel contains a list these security tips, which are parodies of actual security tips.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last tip on the image is most likely a reference to Ingmar Bergman's film [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seventh_Seal#Synopsis The Seventh Seal].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: We've been trying for decades to give people good security advice.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: But in retrospect, lots of the tips actually made things worse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Maybe we should try to give ''bad'' advice?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: I guess it's worth a shot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Security tips&lt;br /&gt;
:(Print out this list and keep it in your bank safe deposit box.) ''(This will make the '''list''' quite secure, but will not help you.)''&lt;br /&gt;
* Don't click links to websites – ''The usual advice is not to click links in unsolicited e-mail, because they might be phishing attempts. Clicking no links whatsoever will seriously degrade your Internet experience.''&lt;br /&gt;
* Use prime numbers in your password&lt;br /&gt;
* Change your password manager monthly – ''Changing ones '''password''' monthly, using a good password manager, will enhance security but is very cumbersome to do. Changing the password '''manager''' this frequently will lead to data loss while migrating passwords from one to the next.''&lt;br /&gt;
* Hold your breath while crossing the border&lt;br /&gt;
* Install a secure font – ''This is ridiculous, or is it? There have been successful exploits of bugs in font rendering engines.''&lt;br /&gt;
* User a 2-factor smoke detector&lt;br /&gt;
* Change your maiden name regularly&lt;br /&gt;
* Put strange USB drives in a bag of rice overnight – ''This is a frequently given advice for drying electronics that have become wet. It will not do anything against possible malware stored on a USB drive.''&lt;br /&gt;
* Use special characters like &amp;amp; and %&lt;br /&gt;
* Only read content published through Tor.com – ''TOR (The Onion Router) is a communications system that uses encrypted connections between many computers, with data packets sent along unpredictable paths in order to avoid interception. Tor.com, on the other hand, is a publishing house that has nothing at all to do with the TOR project.''&lt;br /&gt;
* Use a burner's phone&lt;br /&gt;
* Get an SSL certificate and store it in a safe place – ''Similar to the advice to store this list itself in a safe deposit box, having an SSL certificate (used to protect communications against eavesdropping and impersonation) and then keeping it so secure that one cannot use it, is not very effective.''&lt;br /&gt;
* If a border guard asks to examine your laptop, you have a legal right to challenge them to a chess game for your soul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1810:_Chat_Systems&amp;diff=137277</id>
		<title>1810: Chat Systems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1810:_Chat_Systems&amp;diff=137277"/>
				<updated>2017-03-15T09:58:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Chat systems */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1810&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 13, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Chat Systems&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = chat_systems.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I'm one of the few Instagram users who connects solely through the Unix 'talk' gateway.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|More info needed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
The comic shows an {{w|Euler diagram}} with many different {{w|Online chat|chat systems}} connection possibilities and their overlaps. This is used to explain the relationship between social networks and [[Randall|Randall's]] acquaintances who use them. (Euler diagrams should not be confused with {{w|Venn diagram}}s, see more on this [[:Category:Venn diagrams|here]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the world of {{w|social media}} and [[:Category:Social networking|social networking]], it is extremely easy to communicate with people through the various messaging systems provided. Unfortunately, this can also become very confusing when one (such as Randall in this comic) knows many people who use various combinations of the different chat systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a [[#Chat systems|table]] with explanation for all 24 mentioned chat systems and below that a list of each systems [[#Euler intersections|intersections]] with the other systems. Several of the systems are already considered old but, like ''The &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; tab in an old {{w|Google Doc}}'', but some people keep using them, which is part of the joke. There only seems to be one &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; system which could in no way be said to be an on-line chat system, and that is the ''Wall (bathroom)'' at the bottom, which refers to how people writes notes on public bathroom walls, making it the only extra joke apart from the mess in the main diagram. It may be a reference to [[229: Graffiti]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Randall explains how he is one of the only few {{w|Instagram}} users to use the {{w|Unix}} {{w|Talk_(software)|'talk' gateway}} (an old peer-to-peer chat system whereby users logged into the same UNIX system could privately communicate with each other in a full-screen interface). This implies that he also uses a complicated system of communication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ubiquity of standards - here, of messaging systems - was already covered in [[927: Standards]] and people's hesitation to switch off IRC was mentioned in [[1782: Team Chat]]. The same point about people using various chat systems was used in [[1254: Preferred Chat System]]. And famously the hidden chat room mentioned in [[1305: Undocumented Feature]], was later created by Randall through the [[:Category:April fools' comics|April fools' comic]] [[1506: xkcloud]] - see the [[1506:_xkcloud#Don.27t_contact_us|Don't contact us]] section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Chat systems===&lt;br /&gt;
*The 24 chat systems are listed with the systems having most people at the top, and that number is also listed before the explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
**Notice there are only 23 real systems, as one of the systems is a bathroom wall.&lt;br /&gt;
*See below for each systems [[#Euler intersections|intersections]] with the other systems.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!System&lt;br /&gt;
!Number of people in group&lt;br /&gt;
!Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|SMS}}&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|Short Message Service; a text-based messaging system connecting most worldwide phone systems that had its beginnings in the 1980s and has since represented the most common form of data transmission for most people.  It is principally used to send short text messages between mobile phones, but most phone carriers provide facilities to send-to-email or send-to-voice (for use with landline phones).  Most major phone carriers also provide support for email-to-SMS.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Email}}&lt;br /&gt;
|35&lt;br /&gt;
|A popular form of electronic communication that saw first widespread use in the 1960s. It allows you to send electronic &amp;quot;letters&amp;quot; to people using pre-exchanged email addresses. Many people use this platform, hence the large size of the corresponding circle.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hangouts}}&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Google Hangouts is Google's instant messaging system. It can be used to share data and for video chat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Signal_(software)|Signal}}&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
| An app used for encrypted communications.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|iMessage}}&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Apple's SMS service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|IRC}}&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Internet Relay Chat; a chat protocol from the late 1980's that still sees considerable but declining use today. It is an open, freely available protocol with many free client apps available. Communications are principally in text and users typically use an app to connect to an IRC server, which may in turn be connected to other IRC servers. Many clients also provide for file sharing. There are many client and server plugins that provide access to other protocols (such as IRC-Hangouts, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Slack_(software)|Slack}}&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|A team instant messaging service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Twitter|Twitter DM}}&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;Direct messages&amp;quot; between users on Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|AOL Instant Messenger|AIM}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|AOL Instant Messaging service; a popular messaging system from the 1990s that suffered a severe decline in 2005 upon the release of Gmail and Google Chat.  It is based on the closed source OSCAR protocol, but AOL created the TOC/TOC2 protocol specifications, and made specifications openly available, for third parties to connect to their service.  There have been short-lived dalliances with other protocols since 2008; it has never had direct support for the other widely used protocols here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; tab in an old {{w|Google Doc}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Google Docs is an online word processor reminiscent of Microsoft Word. One of the notable features is online collaborative editing, with a rudimentary chat feature for communication. Randall apparently communicates with someone using the chat in an old Google Doc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Facebook_Messenger|FB Messenger}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Facebook's chat system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Instagram|Instagram DM}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Direct Messaging, a feature of Instagram that allows users to post personal messages to each other.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Peach_(social_network)|Peach}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Peach is a mobile-based social network introduced in January 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Telegram&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Could refer to a cloud based instant messaging system by this name ({{w|Telegram (software)|Telegram}}), or to actually sending messages using {{w|telegrams}}. Telegrams were messages sent by electric telegraphy, which were often typed out and hand-delivered to the recipient. This was the first system for rapid communication across long distances that was widely available, originally developed in the 19th century. Naturally, telegraphy is now wildly obsolete (though some local services apparently do still exist) which would explain why Randall communicates with so few people that way. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Skype}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Microsoft's chat client. It offers VoIP video and audio calls, instant messaging and phoning from within the app.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|WhatsApp}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Billed as encrypted end-to-end chat, allows VoIP chats, text chats, video and image sharing. Caters for group chat as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|WeChat}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
| Started off as a Chinese WhatsApp imitation. WeChat has become a full scale social media with its own news, games and payment system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Apache_HTTP_Server|Apache}} Request {{w|Server_log|Log}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|A file used by Apache HTML server to log page access requests by users, usually stored as access_log. Its use as a communications tool would require the user to embed their messages in URLs and the admin to look for the messages in the logs. It would be inconvenient and time consuming for both parties. It was implemented soon after here: [https://github.com/mdom/smokesignal github]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|BlackBerry Messenger|BBM}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Blackberry message. A chat system available on {{w|BlackBerry}} phones, now largely obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Snapchat}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Snapchat is an image messaging app.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Wall (bathroom)&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|This is the only &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; joke in the comic as this is the only &amp;quot;system&amp;quot; not on-line. Apparently it is a chat system based around writing on the wall in the bathroom. Not an electronic system. It may thus be a reference to [[229: Graffiti]]. Leaving messages on public bathroom walls is a common form of {{w|graffiti}}. It may be used as a support for anonymous conversations. Alternatively, this could mean the person is an extreme introvert, and hides in his bathroom instead of interacting with others, by talking through the wall. It could also be a pun on &amp;quot;communicating through _____&amp;quot; as a bathroom wall is a physical object rather than an interface. It could also refer to someone who has a habit of talking through the wall to people in adjacent stalls of a public bathroom.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Wall (Unix)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Short for &amp;quot;write all&amp;quot;, the &amp;quot;wall&amp;quot; command copies its input to every user logged into the same Unix system, and so can be used as a primitive chat system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Zephyr (protocol)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
| Zephyr was designed as an instant messaging protocol and application-suite with a heavy Unix background.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|ICQ}}&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|An older open-source instant messaging application.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Euler intersections===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a list of each item and its intersections from left top to right bottom is:&lt;br /&gt;
*Skype - none, Email&lt;br /&gt;
*Email - none, Skype, SMS, Slack, Hangouts, IRC, ICQ, iMessage, Signal, WhatsApp, Zephyr, FB Messenger, Instagram DM, BBM, Telegram, Twitter DM&lt;br /&gt;
*SMS - none, Email, Slack, Hangouts, IRC, Snapchat, iMessage, Signal, WeChat, WhatsApp, Zephyr, FB Messenger, Instagram DM, Peach, BBM, Twitter DM&lt;br /&gt;
*AIM - none&lt;br /&gt;
*Slack - Email, SMS, Hangouts, IRC, Signal&lt;br /&gt;
*Hangouts - Email, SMS, Slack, IRC, Signal&lt;br /&gt;
*IRC - Email, SMS, Slack, Hangouts, Signal&lt;br /&gt;
*Snapchat - SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*ICQ - Email&lt;br /&gt;
*iMessage - Email, SMS, Signal, FB Messenger&lt;br /&gt;
*Signal - Email, SMS, Slack, Hangouts, IRC, iMessage, Zephyr, Instagram DM&lt;br /&gt;
*WeChat - SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*WhatsApp - Email, SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*Zephyr - Email, SMS, Signal&lt;br /&gt;
*FB Messenger - Email, SMS, iMessage&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram DM - Email, SMS, Signal&lt;br /&gt;
*Peach - SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*BBM - Email, SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*Telegram - none, Email&lt;br /&gt;
*Twitter DM - none, Email, SMS&lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; tab in an old Google Doc - none&lt;br /&gt;
*Apache Request Log - none&lt;br /&gt;
*Wall (Unix) - none&lt;br /&gt;
*Wall (bathroom) - none&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A large panel with a complicated Euler diagram with 24 circle like drawings representing various chat systems. Most circles are embedded into others as two of the circles (SMS and Email) are much larger than all the others and many of the circles are overlapping each other in complicated ways. But five circles are single separate circles with no connections to others, and three more of the smaller circles are partly outside all others circles. Seven are fully embedded inside one or more circles without crossing any of the circles around them. Those five that do not overlap in any way with the two large circles do also not overlap with each other or any of the other circles. Inside all circles there are at least one character, but the two large circles have 39 (SMS) and 35 (Email) characters. All other have between one and nine characters. In total there are 57 characters. The characters are mainly standard characters like Cueball, Megan, Ponytail and Hairy. But also others are present. There is only one Blondie, and some with a white hair bun (but none drawn like Hairbun). It is noticeable that there are no characters with hats of any kind.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Here follows a list of each chat systems name, the names are written on a break in the lines at the top of their circles. They are from left top to right bottom:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Skype&lt;br /&gt;
:Email&lt;br /&gt;
:SMS&lt;br /&gt;
:AIM&lt;br /&gt;
:Slack&lt;br /&gt;
:Hangouts&lt;br /&gt;
:IRC&lt;br /&gt;
:Snapchat&lt;br /&gt;
:ICQ&lt;br /&gt;
:iMessage&lt;br /&gt;
:Signal&lt;br /&gt;
:WeChat&lt;br /&gt;
:WhatsApp&lt;br /&gt;
:Zephyr&lt;br /&gt;
:FB Messenger&lt;br /&gt;
:Instagram DM&lt;br /&gt;
:Peach&lt;br /&gt;
:BBM&lt;br /&gt;
:Telegram&lt;br /&gt;
:Twitter DM&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; tab in an old Google Doc&lt;br /&gt;
:Apache Request Log&lt;br /&gt;
:Wall (Unix)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wall (bathroom)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a hard time keeping track of which contacts use which chat systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*There are 57 characters in the comic. Here is a version of the comic with numbered characters for reference:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1810 Chat System numbered.PNG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Blondie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Blondie]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social networking]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1792:_Bird/Plane/Superman&amp;diff=134497</id>
		<title>1792: Bird/Plane/Superman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1792:_Bird/Plane/Superman&amp;diff=134497"/>
				<updated>2017-01-30T17:52:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Notes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1792&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 30, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Bird/Plane/Superman&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = bird_plane_superman.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = You can apply special translucent films to your windows to help keep birds/Superman from accidentally flying into them.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a logical comparison of observations to resolve the classic comic book trope of: &amp;quot;Look, up in the sky... It's a bird!... It's a plane!... It's Superman!&amp;quot;  Taking the random citizens' declarations at face value -- a quite exaggerated position -- this comic aims to help such clueless folks identify the airborne object.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observations compared range from the mundane to the bizarre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Notes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mid-air sex involving planes is usually involving passengers (and potentially air crew), not the plane itself.  However, this may be referring to in-flight refueling, or this incident where one plane landed atop another in mid-air:  http://avstop.com/news/plantcity.html&lt;br /&gt;
*Some planes may be able to intentionally purge their septic tanks mid-flight, depending on the design of the waste interlocks, especially assuming the controls are inside the cockpit or cabin.  As the TV show ''MythBusters'' has shown, a leaky septic disposal system can unintentionally lose liquid waste and cause a &amp;quot;blue ice&amp;quot; sighting on the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! !! Bird !! Plane !! Superman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Carries people || || ✓ || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Often flies in groups || ✓ || ✓ ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Created in 20th century || || ✓ || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Uses magnetic navigation || ✓ || ✓ ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Enthusiast community obsesses over small coloration details || ✓ || ✓ || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Preyed on by cats || ✓ || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Occasional mid-air sex || ✓ || ✓ || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Eaten during seasonal feasts || ✓ || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Propelled by flapping || ✓ || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sometimes loses ability to fly, needs to sunbathe to regain it || ✓ || || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Can take a punch || || ✓ || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Mating behaviour often observed by a hidden David Attenborough || ✓ || || Not that we know of&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Capable of intentionally releasing poop mid-flight || ✓ || || ✓&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Chases and eats bugs || ✓ || || Only when bored&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1788:_Barge&amp;diff=134050</id>
		<title>Talk:1788: Barge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1788:_Barge&amp;diff=134050"/>
				<updated>2017-01-23T10:26:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Any reason why the background is black in this one? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.234.34|162.158.234.34]] 16:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Black background...huh? [[User:GoonPontoon|GoonPontoon]] ([[User talk:GoonPontoon|talk]]) 18:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The xkcd Browser Android app, at least, uses black outside the rectangular comic image for this one instead of the usual white. It usually does that for dark-background comics like [[312]]. I don’t know if it gets the color from the site somehow or uses its own heuristics, but either way this isn’t the first time it’s made the “wrong” choice. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.148|162.158.78.148]] 18:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When did the fine print at the bottom of the xkcd homepage change? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.122.102|162.158.122.102]] 18:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:A few weeks ago, exactly when I'm not sure.&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, [[footnote|for quite a while]] [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 21:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Where do we put this kind of information on this wiki? Very funny but not so great as the one about the humour --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 23:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly would cause a rocket to explode when it lands on this trick-barge (and into water)? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.48|141.101.105.48]] 08:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If the computer thinks it landed on a solid barge, it will turn off the engine, and the rocket will tip over, crash into the remaining hull, and explode. If the computer does not think it landed, the engine will enter the water and either go out (tip over, explode) or cause a steam explosion followed by a fuel tank explosion. [[User:Chrullrich|Chrullrich]] ([[User talk:Chrullrich|talk]]) 10:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure it is intended to be destructive, so much as scaling up of the everyday. You know how satisfying it is when you open a new jar of coffee or spread and get to punch the paper seal with a spoon? Randall has previously referred to these little pleasures, like cleaning the dryer fluff in https://xkcd.com/1346/ . [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.244|141.101.98.244]] 09:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1751:_Movie_Folder&amp;diff=129431</id>
		<title>1751: Movie Folder</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1751:_Movie_Folder&amp;diff=129431"/>
				<updated>2016-10-27T08:03:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: The Significance of Prepositions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1751&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 26, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Movie Folder&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = movie_folder.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = That's actually the original Japanese version of A Million Random Digits, which is much better than the American remake the book was based on.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Are there more to some of the titles? Are there other similar situations with these two guys?}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is looking through [[Black Hat|Black Hat's]] downloaded movies, which are all adaptations of non-literary works, improbable sequels, and/or crossovers between very disparate properties. Cueball reacts with increasing incredulity to Black Hat's collection, while Black Hat casually responds with equally unlikely (non-)explanations. Knowing Black Hat, his movie folder is deliberately weird just to provoke this kind of reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the real world, there are movies which can provoke similar shock. For example, many successful films get {{w|direct-to-video}} (or, now, {{w|direct-to-digital}}) sequels and spinoffs, often featuring none of the original cast and which get very little marketing. Therefore, someone might be surprised to know that there's an ''{{w|American Psycho 2}}'', a ''{{w|Starship Troopers 3: Marauder|Starship Troopers 3}}'', a ''{{w|Dr. Dolittle: Tail to the Chief|Dr. Dolittle 4}}'', or a ''{{w|Bring It On: Fight to the Finish|Bring It On 5}}''. [[Randall]] previously made fun of the proliferation of direct-to-video sequels in [https://what-if.xkcd.com/65/ What If: Twitter Timeline Height], with at least 27 ''Land Before Time'' films (in reality, there were 14).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source of weird titles are {{w|mockbuster}}s. When a film uses a {{w|public domain}} property as its basis, or a title that is too generic to trademark, other studios will simply create their own films and pretend that they're a sequel to the more famous film. Examples include ''{{w|Titanic II (film)|Titanic II}}'', ''{{w|Troll 2}}'', ''{{w|Troll 3}}'', the ''other'' ''{{w|Quest for the Mighty Sword|Troll 3}}'', and ''{{w|War of the Worlds 2: The Next Wave}}''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marketing wheezes have also produced some crossovers almost as unexpected as those in the comic — ''{{w|Abbott and Costello Meet Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde}}'', ''{{w|Scooby-Doo! WrestleMania Mystery}}'' and ''{{w|Jesse James Meets Frankenstein's Daughter}}''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A similar setting with Cueball and Black Hat also discussing movies was seen in [[493: Actuarial]]. Back then Black Hat was still reading newspapers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another type of comic where movie titles needs to be guessed from strange versions of the title was previously used in the [[:Category:Synonym Movies|Synonym Movies]] series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Black Hat's downloaded movies ===&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Title&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Lorem Ipsum: The Movie'' ||  ''{{w|Lorem Ipsum}}'' are the first two words of a common block of garbled Latin filler text used by typesetters to layout pages before real text is available.  This title implies that this movie is entirely random filler with no meaningful content, although according to the Internet Movie Database, there is a 2011 movie titled [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2032487/ Lorem Ipsum].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Titanic XCVIII'' || The most famous  film about the ship ''{{w|RMS Titanic|Titanic}}'' is {{w|James Cameron|James Cameron's}} {{w|Titanic (1997 movie)|''Titanic''}} from 1997. But there have been {{w|List of films about the RMS Titanic|several since then}} (at least five) some of which where probably trying to cash in on the name, especially the one called ''{{w|Titanic II (film)|Titanic II}}'', which is about a ship in 2012 called ''Titanic II''. But the producers probably hoped some people would buy the DVD believing it was a sequel to the 1997 movie, a real mockbuster, originally released directly for TV. Black Hat's dialogue implies the preceding films are about at least 97 different ''Titanic''s which all sank, creating an artificial reef, and this film is about the 98th (Roman numerals XCVIII = 98) hitting that reef (rather than an iceberg). As ''Titanic'' rests on the Atlantic sea floor at a depth of 3,784&amp;amp;nbsp;m (12,415&amp;amp;nbsp;feet), each of the previous ''Titanic''s would need to a) settle immediately on top of its predecessor and b) increase the height of the &amp;quot;reef&amp;quot; by about 40&amp;amp;nbsp;m (128&amp;amp;nbsp;feet) on average.  The original ''Titanic'' was 53 m (175 feet) tall and (assuming a and b above), the keel of the 98th ship would sink to a depth of 20&amp;amp;nbsp;m (65&amp;amp;nbsp;feet).  However, it would be impossible to stack only 97 ''Titanic'' replicas in a more than 3 km high pile in this location to reach this height.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Debbie Did 9/11'' || A combination of ''{{w|Debbie Does Dallas}}'', a 1970s porn film about a young woman trying for a cheerleader squad, and a {{w|9/11 conspiracy theory}}. Actual ''Debbie Does Dallas'' sequels include 5 numbered ones, two titled ''Debbie Does Dallas Again'', several with subtitles, and some parodies, unofficial sequels and spinoffs that — like the title quote here — change what Debbie does. IMDb lists, among others, ''Debbie Does Iowa'', ''Debbie Does Wall Street'', ''Debbie Does 'em All'' and ''Debbie Does Damnation''. But it is always Does and never Did... However, in this kind of movie when she does something it of course means to have sex, while {{w|September 11 attacks|9/11}} is a historical event.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Time Jam: A Connecticut Huskie on King Arthur's Court'' || A combination of the novel ''{{w|A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court}}'' by {{w|Mark Twain}} and the 1996 movie ''{{w|Space Jam}}''. Mark Twain's story is one of the first {{w|time travel}} stories, while ''Space Jam'' stars {{w|Michael Jordan}} and features the {{w|Looney Tunes}} cartoon characters playing basketball against aliens. The huskie is a reference to the University of Connecticut sports teams called the {{w|Connecticut Huskies}}, most notably their basketball team.  So in this movie it is one of these Connecticut players who gets Time Jammed (rather than Space Jammed) back to the fictional {{w|King Arthur|King Arthur's}} {{w|Court (royal)|court}} in the late 5th and early 6th centuries AD. An additional basketball reference is the use of &amp;quot;''on'' King Arthur's Court&amp;quot; rather than the original &amp;quot;''in'' King Arthur's Court&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Harold and Kumar Go to Howl's Moving Castle'' || A combination of ''{{w|Harold and Kumar go to White Castle}}'' — about the meandering and very adult adventures of {{w|Harold and Kumar}} (a pair of stoners) — and ''{{w|Howl's Moving Castle (film)|Howl's Moving Castle}}'' — a tender, often philosophical children's {{w|anime}} film by {{w|Hayao Miyazaki}}, based on a novel by {{w|Diana Wynne Jones}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates'' || This is actually {{w|A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates|a real book from 1955}} (also referenced in [[1210: I'm So Random]]) — back before scientists had access to computers that could easily generate random numbers, this book was very useful for statistics and for setting up scientific experiments. The book is {{w|File:Random digits.png|literally just a list of numbers}}, so there would be no movie in it except for flashing numbers on a screen. Black Hat comments that the movie came before the book, which was a {{w|novelization}} of the film. The '''title text''' says that the movie is an adaptation of Japanese version. But in the modern world 'Arabic' digits are nearly universal, so it is hard to understand how an adaptation would be different from the Japanese original, unless they used {{w|Japanese numerals}} (which are rarely used for mathematical purposes).  It is very common that great/successful Japanese movies (and other countries' great movies) are made into (often mediocre) American remakes, like the famous horror movie ''{{w|Ring (film)|Ring}}'' from 1998, which was remade in America as ''{{w|The Ring (2002 film)|The Ring}}'' in 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Michael Bay's The Vagina Monologues'' || ''{{w|The Vagina Monologues}}'' is a famous play by {{w|Eve Ensler}}. It consists entirely of a series of women talking frankly about their bodies, their sexuality and their lives. There's no place in it for explosions, but {{w|Michael Bay}} (who is known especially for the modern {{w|Transformers (film series)|Transformers movies}} as well as ''{{w|The Rock (film)|The Rock}}'' and ''{{w|Armageddon (1998 film)|Armageddon}}'', and is also known for his [http://www.thewrap.com/megan-fox-quit-transformers-over-michael-bays-abuse-17614/ rather unfeminist behavior] and excessive explosions in the movies he directs) found a way. Black Hat comments that he found it good despite all those {{w|Computer-generated imagery|CGI}} explosions.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat is sitting in an armchair, with the right arm on the armrest and looking at his smartphone held in his left hand, when a voice from behind him (off-panel left) addresses him. It turns out in the next panels that it is Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball (off-panel): Your movie folder is so ''weird''. Where do you find all this stuff?&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Dunno.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In an frame-less panel Cueball is seen sitting in an office chair at a desk facing left. He is looking at Black Hat's computer while typing on the keyboard which is on a shelve lower than the regular desk surface. Black Hat replies to his queries from behind him off-panel right.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Lorem Ipsum: The Movie?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Titanic XCVIII?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat (off-panel): That series gets good when they start hitting the reef created by all the previous wrecks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball leans in closer to the screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Debbie Did 9/11?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Time Jam: A Connecticut Huskie on King Arthur's Court?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat (off-panel): Really underrated ''Space Jam'' sequel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on the scene so nothing beneath the keyboard is visible. The screen and Cueballs head almost spans the width of the panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Harold and Kumar Go to Howl's Moving Castle?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat (off-panel): That's the original-the book was a novelization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Back to Black Hat sitting in the chair as in the first panel, but leaning a bit further back and the arm on the armrest has been moved closer to him.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball (off-panel): ''Michael Bay's The Vagina Monologues!?''&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: It's pretty good, despite all the CGI explosions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fiction]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1351:_Metamaterials&amp;diff=127135</id>
		<title>1351: Metamaterials</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1351:_Metamaterials&amp;diff=127135"/>
				<updated>2016-09-16T12:49:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Chrullrich: /* Transcript */ Mention the color change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1351&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 4, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Metamaterials&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = metamaterials.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If I developed a hue-shifting metamaterial, I would photobomb people's Instagram pics with a sheet of material that precisely undid the filter they were using.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Metamaterials}}, artificially-created structures typically made from several materials in a microscopic checkerboard pattern, are famous for allowing bizarre optical properties, such as {{w|Metamaterial cloaking|invisibility cloaks}}. This comic imagines that metamaterials can change the color of light passing through them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the real world a metamaterial can alter the spatial distribution of light and also its frequency, like done in {{w|Fluorescent lamp}}s — but this would not resemble the entire picture in a different color. In photography many {{w|Photographic filter#Color conversion|filters}} are used to enhance the quality and appearance of the image. These filters do not alter colors but block some of them, so the result is shown in a different color than the original. Nevertheless, no application like this is able to switch a single color to another as it can be done by most modern computer photo programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] uses a box made of her metamaterial to switch the colors of the cliché Valentine's Day poem, &amp;quot;{{w|Roses are red}}, violets are blue, sugar is sweet and so are you.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text references this with [[Randall]] pondering making a metamaterial that reverses the effect of {{w|instagram}} filters, likely by placing the material between the camera and the subject just before the picture is taken without the photographer noticing - a so-called {{W|photobombing}}. Instagram is a photo application that applies one of a variety of filters like {{w|Color theory|hue-shift}} or contrast adjustments meant to simulate the look of old photographs. These filters may be able to interchange blue and red - as they are not real material filters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[An image of a violet that is colored red.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-screen):&lt;br /&gt;
:Violets are red.&lt;br /&gt;
:[An image of a rose that is colored blue.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-screen):&lt;br /&gt;
:And roses are blue.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan and Cueball are standing around a table, on which a screen is in front of the rose and violet. Megan is in front of a lectern with a mic. All of this is on a stage.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan:&lt;br /&gt;
:When metamaterials&lt;br /&gt;
:[Same scene, but Megan moves the screen away from in front of the rose and violet. It is revealed that the flowers' actual colors are those from the original poem, i.e. the violet is blue and the rose is red.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan:&lt;br /&gt;
:Alter their hue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Chrullrich</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>