<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DiamondNether90</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DiamondNether90"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/DiamondNether90"/>
		<updated>2026-07-10T23:18:17Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2372:_Dialect_Quiz&amp;diff=415091</id>
		<title>2372: Dialect Quiz</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2372:_Dialect_Quiz&amp;diff=415091"/>
				<updated>2026-06-24T06:29:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DiamondNether90: What's a hammer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2372&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 14, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Dialect Quiz&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = dialect_quiz.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Do you make a distinction between shallots, scallops, and scallions? If you use all three words, do they all have different meanings, all the same, or are two the same and one different?&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a parody of online quizzes that offer to compare the user's dialect of American English with others around the country. These quizzes generally contain questions about word usage, names for certain objects, and pronunciations that vary between different regions of the US. There are also quizzes about broader English dialects, but this comic focuses on commonly cited differences between American dialects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest quiz of this type to be widely disseminated online was the [http://dialect.redlog.net/ Harvard Dialect Survey], conducted in the early 2000s by Bert Vaux and Scott Golder. The survey created maps of the distribution of various word usage (such as pop/soda/coke for a fizzy softdrink) and was a relatively early example of widely shared Internet &amp;quot;viral&amp;quot; content. In 2013, Josh Katz of the New York Times created [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/upshot/dialect-quiz-map.html a new version] based on the Harvard survey, which became the Times' [https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/-em-the-new-york-times-em-most-popular-story-of-2013-was-not-an-article/283167/ most popular content of 2013] and spread the idea to many more people. Many of the questions in this comic directly derive from entries in those surveys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall's previous two comics have been about election predictions, leading up to the 2020 US General Presidential Election. A prominent predictor of the election results is [[Nate Silver]], who runs the FiveThirtyEight website. He [https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1315348221565206530 posted his results] of taking the New York Times version of the survey on October 11, 2020, just three days before this comic was posted. [[2371: Election Screen Time]] specifically suggests that Randall may be spending too much time obsessing over new posts and content from the election predictors. It's coincidental, but likely, that Nate Silver's tweet inspired Randall's post: he was reminded of the 2013 feature from the Times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; How do you address a group of two or more people?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) You&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Y'all&lt;br /&gt;
* C) I have not been around two or more people for so long that I can't remember&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to the first question of the Times quiz: &amp;quot;How would you address {{w|You#Informal_plural_forms|a group of two or more people}}?&amp;quot; (with options including &amp;quot;you all&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;you guys&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;y'all&amp;quot;, etc.). Option C may reference the significant decrease in human interaction and social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Alternatively, it may suggest that some xkcd readers are particularly introverted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; How do you pronounce &amp;quot;Penelope&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Rhymes with &amp;quot;Antelope&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Rhymes with &amp;quot;Develop&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Both the options for this are wrong, making it the first of many quiz questions to be impossible to answer correctly. Neither Option A's &amp;quot;PEN-e-lohp&amp;quot; /ˈpɛːnəˌloʊp/ (possibly &amp;quot;PEEN-e-lohp&amp;quot; /ˈpiːnɪˌloʊp/) nor Option B's &amp;quot;pe-NELL-up&amp;quot; /pɪˈnɛləp/ are a typical pronunciation of this name (beyond mispronunciations). In English, the only correct way to pronounce this name is &amp;quot;pe-NELL-o-pee&amp;quot; /pəˈnɛləpi/, which is not listed. (A) is the answer Juan from Club Dread (2004) would have given, and the way video game parody band &amp;quot;Random Encounters&amp;quot; pronounces their second cat's name. In Questionable Content, this is also the way Faye pronounces Penelope's name in comic 725. Whether this is a coincidence or deliberate is unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the scientific field that studies the stars?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Astrology&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
* C) Cosmetology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The actual answer is {{w|astronomy}}, which is not listed, though several answers ''are'' listed that sound similar to fields that study stars. {{w|Astrology}} is the pseudo-scientific &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the influence of the stars and planets on our lives, including horoscopes, {{w|agronomy}} ''is'' scientific but instead studies agriculture, and {{w|cosmetology}} is the study of cosmetics and makeup (with a name close to {{w|cosmology}}, a branch of astronomy, and {{w|comet}}, an astronomical object). The last may also be referring to the occasionally makeup-heavy faces of movie and television &amp;quot;stars&amp;quot;. [[:Category:Astronomy|Astronomy]] and [[:Category:Cosmology|cosmology]] are recurring themes on xkcd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; How do you pronounce &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Gone-ra&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Juh-neer&lt;br /&gt;
* C) Jen-er-uh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to a question found on some quizzes: &amp;quot;How do you pronounce ''genre''? ZHAHN-ruh, or JAHN-ruh?&amp;quot; A majority of (American) English speakers pronounce &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot; as either &amp;quot;'''ZH'''AHN-ruh&amp;quot; /ˈʒɔnrə/ (beginning with the &amp;quot;zh&amp;quot; sound found in &amp;quot;trea'''s'''ure&amp;quot;) or &amp;quot;'''J'''AHN-ruh&amp;quot; /ˈdʒɔnrə/ (beginning with the &amp;quot;j&amp;quot; sound in &amp;quot;justice&amp;quot;). Neither of these are listed, and none of the quiz's pronunciation options are common. However, they are close to other words: ''GONE-ra'' /ˈgɔnrə/ sounds like {{w|gonorrhea}} /ˌgɔnəˈriə/, ''juh-NEER'' /dʒəˈnɪər/ is the way the second and third syllables of ''engineer'' are pronounced, and ''JEN-er-uh'' /ˈdʒɛnərə/ is close to how ''genera'' /dʒɛˈnirə/ (the plural of {{w|genus}}) is pronounced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Do you pronounce &amp;quot;Google&amp;quot; with a high-pitched yelp on the...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) First syllable&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Second syllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Google&amp;quot; is not generally pronounced with a high-pitched yelp on either syllable.{{Citation needed}} On the other hand, {{w|Yahoo!}}, a competitor of Google, has advertised its services with a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm5FE0x9eY0 high-pitched yodeling jingle], with the high-pitched yelp on the second syllable (as opposed to {{w|Goofy}}'s [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-70mtXw35c iconic holler], with the high yelp on the first syllable).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the thing on the wall at school that you drink water from?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Gutter pipe&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Drainpipe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to a quiz question in the Harvard and Times quizzes, &amp;quot;What do you call the thing from which you might drink water in a school?&amp;quot; Answers included &amp;quot;drinking fountain&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;water fountain&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;bubbler&amp;quot;. However, the question in this comic implies that school children (or at least the quiz maker) drink out of {{w|Rain gutter|gutter pipes}} or drain pipes, which are used to collect rainwater and/or {{w|sewage|should absolutely not be drunk from.}} This may be hinting at the fact that at that time some of the drinking fountains has been polluted by virus, and was considered &amp;quot;as dangerous as drainpipes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; How do you pronounce the name for a short silent video file?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Animated give&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Animated gift&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to the &amp;quot;{{w|Gif}}&amp;quot; pronunciation debate, with people split between pronouncing it &amp;quot;gif&amp;quot; (with the hard-G sound in &amp;quot;graphics&amp;quot;) or &amp;quot;jif&amp;quot; (with the soft-G sound in &amp;quot;giraffe&amp;quot;).  Both options presented in this quiz use the hard-G sound, but neither option uses the standard pronunciation for the ending of the word, &amp;quot;if&amp;quot;. The original authors of the standard clarified they intended it to be said as if &amp;quot;jif&amp;quot;. Maybe it is entirely appropriate that their product, which lacks any audio stream, was made known to most of its end-users without a sound-guide and left everyone to spontaneously derive their own way of voicing its name. This is also a reference to [https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/gift-as-a-verb how some people dislike the use of the word &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; as a verb, and think that &amp;quot;give&amp;quot; should be used instead].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the baseball-sized garden bugs that, when poked, glow brightly and emit a warbling scream?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) What?&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Lawn buddies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: There are many different varieties of common insects with distinctive traits and behaviors, some of which even have multiple names; the creatures described &amp;quot;lawn buddies&amp;quot; combine three of these traits into one peculiar and somewhat frightening bug. The fact that no known creature like this exists forms the humor of the two answers: the first is reasonably confused, and the second is alarmingly familiar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The Harvard and Times quizzes actually include the question: &amp;quot;What do you call the {{w|Armadillidiidae|small gray bug}} that curls up into a ball when it’s touched?&amp;quot; (options include &amp;quot;roly-poly,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;pill-bug&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;potato bug&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;doodle bug&amp;quot;, etc.). It is also worth mentioning that &amp;quot;potato bug&amp;quot; itself can refer to three completely different kinds of insect; besides the aforementioned &amp;quot;{{w|Armadillidiidae|small gray bug}},&amp;quot; it can also refer to the {{w|Colorado potato beetle}} or to the {{w|Jerusalem cricket}}. A dialect quiz such as this one might ask the quiz-taker to identify what kind of insect they associate the term with.&lt;br /&gt;
# The {{w|Firefly|Lampyridae}} family of insects do glow (although not exactly &amp;quot;brightly&amp;quot;). These insects emit their light spontaneously, as a mating signal, though they often do emit light when shaken or presumably poked. These are variously called &amp;quot;fireflies,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;glowworms,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lightning bugs;&amp;quot; a dialect quiz might reasonably ask the quiz-taker's preferred term.&lt;br /&gt;
# {{w|cicada|Cicadas}} and {{w|Madagascar_hissing_cockroach|cockroaches}} can be large for insects, though nothing approaching the size of a baseball, and can make very loud noises indeed, although it would be a bit of a stretch to describe any of their associated sounds as a &amp;quot;warbling scream.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the misleading lines painted by disgruntled highway workers to trick cars into driving off the road?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Prank lines&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Devil's Marks&lt;br /&gt;
* C) Fool-me lines&lt;br /&gt;
* D) Fauxguides&lt;br /&gt;
* E) Delaware lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to the fact that some quiz questions ask about road features, such as &amp;quot;verge/berm/parking strip/curb strip&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;roundabout/traffic circle/rotary&amp;quot;. However, these particular road lines, if they have ever been made, aren't common enough to warrant different names, unless the creator of the Quiz is referring to painted lines that haven't fully faded out of existence. The Delaware Line was a formation within the Continental Army. Devil's Marks may be a takeoff of [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Devil%27s%20Strip Devil's Strip]. Misleading lines on the road were also mentioned in [[1958: Self-Driving Issues]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the blue-green planet in the outer Solar System?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Uranus&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Neptune&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This question references the fact that Uranus and Neptune are quite similar in appearance, as well as the two common pronunciations of Uranus: &amp;quot;YURR-ə-nəss&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;yoo-RAY-nəss&amp;quot; (which sounds like the phrase &amp;quot;{{tvtropes|UranusIsShowing|your anus}}&amp;quot;, a favorite joke of little kids). The original Greek pronunciation is &amp;quot;oo-ra-nos&amp;quot;, but this is not a common pronunciation among English speakers. It also references the fact that Uranus and Neptune are both blue-green colored planets in the outer solar system and are often confused by people who don't know much about them. (It's a common misconception that Neptune is dark blue, but [https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3761 it's actually blue-green].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call this tool?&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CloveHammer.png|150px|alt=Image of a claw hammer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Banger&lt;br /&gt;
* B) Nail axe&lt;br /&gt;
* C) Wood mage wand&lt;br /&gt;
* D) I'm familiar with this tool but have no specific word for it&lt;br /&gt;
* E) I have never seen it before &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The only name most people would ever call this tool is a &amp;quot;hammer&amp;quot;.{{Citation Needed}} The last two options reference options in many quiz questions like &amp;quot;I'm familiar with this but have no specific word for it&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I am not familiar with this&amp;quot; (such as on the pill-bug/roly-poly question on the real quiz). These may appear as options to questions that ask about something that might not exist everywhere, or something which many may not have a word for (for example, some areas of the United States have a name for &amp;quot;sunshowers,&amp;quot; while most don't). However, it's a bit absurd for these options to be present for this question (and this question alone), as virtually all users in an English dialect test would be expected to know what a hammer is.  This also serves as a bit of reverse perspective on the saying, &amp;quot;{{w|Law of the instrument|When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.}}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call a long sandwich with meats and lettuce and stuff?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) A long sandwich with meats and lettuce and stuff&lt;br /&gt;
* B) A longwich&lt;br /&gt;
* C) A salad hot dog&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to a common dialect quiz question: &amp;quot;What do you call a {{w|Submarine sandwich|long sandwich}}?&amp;quot; with options typically including &amp;quot;sub&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;hoagie&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;, etc. The first answer directly repeats the phrasing of the prompt, painting the person who would answer that way as either very literal-minded or bearing a snarky side. The hot dog answer could refer to the common online discussion: &amp;quot;Is a hot dog a sandwich?, and bears resemblance to jokes playing on synonyms to discredit their need for unique names, i.e. &amp;quot;Beef jerky is just a meat raisin.&amp;quot; In this case, the argument would be &amp;quot;A sub sandwich is just a salad hot dog.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you call the scaly many-legged animal often found in attics?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) Lightbulb eater&lt;br /&gt;
* B) I have no special name for them&lt;br /&gt;
* C) I've never looked in my attic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Another reference to the frequent appearance of quiz questions asking what users call various creepy crawlies. {{w|Millipedes}} best fit the description. They have many legs, though rarely if ever a thousand of them, as their name (from the Latin word for &amp;quot;thousand feet&amp;quot;) suggests. The hard rings that separate an individual's body into segments give the animal a scaly appearance. And of the thousands of species, only a few have common names, hence &amp;quot;no special name for them&amp;quot;. The reference to &amp;quot;lightbulb eater&amp;quot; is obscure, but may refer to the tendency of millipedes to congregate in large numbers in dark crevices, or perhaps Randall is simply conjuring more frightening creatures. Perhaps Randall found some in empty (no bulb) light fixtures in his attic, though it is possible this refers to another unknown frightening creature that nobody has a word for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Normally, questions about uncommon things would include an &amp;quot;I've never seen one&amp;quot; option, like option E in the hammer question. Instead, this question has &amp;quot;I've never looked in my attic&amp;quot; as an option, implying that these creatures are present in all attics, and anyone who doesn't know them would have to have never checked their attic at all, or that they are too afraid of this creature possibly dwelling in their own attic to go look. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; What do you say when someone around you sneezes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A) &amp;quot;What was that?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* B) &amp;quot;Oh, wow.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* C) [Quietly] &amp;quot;Yikes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Reference to a question on some quizzes about which of several words/phrases you say in response to a sneeze, with usual answers including &amp;quot;bless you&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;{{w|Gesundheit}}&amp;quot; (from the German word for 'health'). This question may also be referencing the {{w|COVID-19 pandemic}} in answer C (and possibly answer B). Sneezing isn't a primary symptom of COVID-19, but most people are hyper-aware of possibly contracting the disease from the people around them so sneezes are treated with suspicion and it's seen as rude to sneeze openly. It is also possible that a person who has been able to catch a sneeze-producing condition has also caught COVID-19 and, while the sneeze itself isn't ''caused'' by it, the air and various airway fluids so forcefully projected are a possible infective vector with that little extra frisson of concern, given the current situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Do you make a distinction between shallots, scallops, and scallions? If you use all three words, do they all have different meanings, all the same, or are two the same and one different?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Phrased similarly to questions like one on the Times quiz, &amp;quot;How do you pronounce the words Mary, merry, and marry?&amp;quot; Options included &amp;quot;all three are pronounced the same&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;all three are pronounced differently,&amp;quot; or all three combinations of two being the same and one different. Also refers to the naming confusion around {{w|scallions}} and {{w|shallots}} - also known as 'eschalots' - but with the unrelated but similar-sounding {{w|scallops}} substituted in the middle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: 'Shallots', 'scallions' and 'eschalots' are names used in different dialects, for various species and cultivars of onion used in cooking, either as a small bulb (especially [[wikipedia:shallot|Allium cepa var. Aggregatum]]) or as a long green leaf (especially [[wikipedia:Allium_fistulosum|Allium fistulosum]]). In many dialects, the green leaf type is called a 'scallion' and the bulb a 'shallot'.  In at least one dialect (NSW Australia) the green leaf type is called a 'shallot' and the bulb an 'eschalot'.  This causes confusion in recipes posted online.  The word 'shallot' is also pronounced with emphasis on either the first or second syllable, as referred to in question 5.  Despite the answer options offered, there is no evidence of dialects which use all three terms, or where 'shallot' and 'scallion' are interchangeable. Many people in the US call scallions &amp;quot;green onions&amp;quot;, as was joked about in [https://genius.com/Stan-freberg-christmas-dragnet-lyrics Stan Frieberg's Christmas Dragnet parody].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{w|Scallops}} are invertebrate marine animals similar to oysters and clams, frequently harvested for food.  In some regions of the UK and Australia potato {{w|fritters}} are also called 'scallops'. The word 'scallop' itself can be pronounced either as /ˈskɒləp/ or /ˈskæləp/, and its spelling has varied over time in a similar way to that of 'shallot'.  However, these are difficult to confuse with shallots or scallions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Box with title at the top]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Dialect Quiz&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[Smaller subtitle underneath]&lt;br /&gt;
:Compare answers with your friends!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Quiz is divided into two columns. Answers to questions are indicated by a letter followed by a closed parentheses, such as A). These letters are greyed out]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Column 1:]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How do you address a group of two or more people?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) You&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Y'all&lt;br /&gt;
:C) I have not been around two or more people for so long that I can't remember&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you pronounce &amp;quot;Penelope&amp;quot;?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Rhymes with &amp;quot;Antelope&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Rhymes with &amp;quot;Develop&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the scientific field that studies the stars?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Astrology&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Agronomy&lt;br /&gt;
:C) Cosmetology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you pronounce &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot;?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Gone-ra&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Juh-neer&lt;br /&gt;
:C) Jen-er-uh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You pronounce &amp;quot;Google&amp;quot; with a high-pitched yelp on the...	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) First syllable&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Second syllable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the thing on the wall at school that you drink water from?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Gutter pipe&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Drainpipe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you pronounce the name for a short silent video file?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Animated give&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Animated gift&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the baseball-sized garden bugs that, when poked, glow brightly and emit a warbling scream?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) What?&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Lawn buddies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Column 2:]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the misleading lines painted by disgruntled highway workers to trick cars into driving off the road?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Prank lines&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Devil's Marks&lt;br /&gt;
:C) Fool-me lines&lt;br /&gt;
:D) Fauxguides&lt;br /&gt;
:E) Delaware lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the blue-green planet in the outer Solar System?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Uranus&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Neptune&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call this tool?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[Image of a claw hammer]	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Banger&lt;br /&gt;
:B) Nail axe&lt;br /&gt;
:C) Wood mage wand&lt;br /&gt;
:D) I'm familiar with this tool but have no specific word for it&lt;br /&gt;
:E) I have never seen it before&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call a long sandwich with meats and lettuce and stuff?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) A long sandwich with meats and lettuce and stuff&lt;br /&gt;
:B) A longwich&lt;br /&gt;
:C) A salad hot dog&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you call the scaly many-legged animal often found in attics?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) Lightbulb eater&lt;br /&gt;
:B) I have no special name for them&lt;br /&gt;
:C) I've never looked in my attic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you say when someone around you sneezes?	&lt;br /&gt;
:A) &amp;quot;What was that?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:B) &amp;quot;Oh, wow.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:C) [Quietly] &amp;quot;Yikes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The xkcd Twitter account posted a [https://twitter.com/xkcd/status/1316484953480323072 series of Twitter polls] asking the questions in this comic.&lt;br /&gt;
**How do you address a group of two or more people?&lt;br /&gt;
***You (31.2%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Y'all (33.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Can’t remember anymore (35.3%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**How do you pronounce “Penelope”?&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Rhymes with “antelope” (58.6%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
***Rhymes with “develop” (41.4%)&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the scientific field that studies the stars?&lt;br /&gt;
***Astrology (34.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Agronomy (18.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Cosmetology (47%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**How do you pronounce &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
***Gone-ra (24.7%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Juh-neer (18.8%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Jen-er-uh (56.5%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Do you pronounce &amp;quot;Google&amp;quot; with a high-pitched yelp on the...&lt;br /&gt;
***'''First syllable (63.6%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
***Second syllable (36.4%)&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the thing on the wall at school that you drink water from?&lt;br /&gt;
***Gutter pipe (32.9%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Drainpipe (67.1%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**How do you pronounce the name for a short silent video file?&lt;br /&gt;
***Animated give (29.6%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Animated gift (70.4%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the baseball-sized garden bugs that, when poked, glow brightly and emit a warbling scream?&lt;br /&gt;
***What? (48.6%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Lawn buddies (51.4%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the misleading lines painted by disgruntled highway workers to trick cars into driving off the road?&lt;br /&gt;
***Prank/fool-me lines (14.8%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Devil's marks (22%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Fauxguides (22.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Delaware lines (40.6%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the blue-green planet in the outer solar system?&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Uranus (51.7%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
***Neptune (48.3%)&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call this tool? 🔨&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Banger (29.7%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
***Nail axe (22%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Wood mage wand (29.1%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Don't know/not familiar (19.2%)&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call a long sandwich with meats and lettuce and stuff?&lt;br /&gt;
***'''That description verbatim (43.1%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
***A longwich (33.2%)&lt;br /&gt;
***A salad hot dog (23.7%)&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you call the scaly many-legged animal often found in attics?&lt;br /&gt;
***Lightbulb eater (29.5%)&lt;br /&gt;
***Don't have a name for it (19%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''Never looked in my attic (51.5%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
**What do you say when someone around you sneezes?&lt;br /&gt;
***&amp;quot;What was that?&amp;quot; (8.6%)&lt;br /&gt;
***&amp;quot;Oh, wow.&amp;quot; (17.1%)&lt;br /&gt;
***'''[quietly] &amp;quot;Yikes.&amp;quot; (74.3%)'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Shallots, scallops, and scallions ran against each other in [[1529: Bracket]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:COVID-19]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DiamondNether90</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3201:_Proof_Without_Content&amp;diff=414142</id>
		<title>3201: Proof Without Content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3201:_Proof_Without_Content&amp;diff=414142"/>
				<updated>2026-06-02T01:44:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DiamondNether90: Explain &amp;quot;left as an exercise for the reader&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3201&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 30, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Proof Without Content&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = proof_without_content_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 259x353px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = There's also a proof without content of a conjecture without content, but it's left as an exercise for the reader.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic refers to {{w|Proof without words|proofs without words}}, which rely on images or other geometric tools to visually demonstrate a concept without further explanation. However, this comic presents a proof with no content whatsoever inside the ''Proof:'' box, and is instead apparently proven by the existence of the proof itself. The comic additionally suggests that this proof is ''convincing'', which is subjective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this conjecture cannot be generalized and the proof only proves this special case: the vast majority of conjectures cannot be proven without content.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[&amp;amp;#8203;[[285: Wikipedian Protester|proof needed]]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; This proof requires the conjecture to be stated, which could be construed as content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This could be a parody on scientists sometimes creating empty papers as an inside joke, such as [https://ciencias.ulisboa.pt/sites/default/files/fcul/outros/Chemical-Free.pdf a comprehensive overview of chemical-free consumer products] – the point with that paper being that the {{wiktionary|chemical#Usage notes|lay meaning}} behind &amp;quot;chemical-free&amp;quot; can be considered technically nonsensical, given that anything physical contains chemical elements, so no products can be free of them. (And, even in the various more vague senses that may be intended, it {{w|Appeal to nature#Examples|isn't necessarily}} as good a selling point as it may try to suggest.) Another example of an academic article without words is {{w|The Unsuccessful Self-Treatment of a Case of &amp;quot;Writer's Block&amp;quot;}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another proof without content, that a conjecture without content could exist. This would imply a conjecture-proof pair with no content whatsoever. This could only be discussed indirectly, which is why it is mentioned and left as an {{w|Proof by Intimidation|exercise for the reader}} (&amp;quot;... left as an exercise for the reader&amp;quot; is a line found in many textbooks, encouraging readers to practice what they have learnt). Alternatively, the exercise could be forming the conjecture and proof itself if the conjecture-proof pair is interpreted as a blank sheet of paper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Within a panel, two boxes stacked vertically. Each one has a label above it.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Top box label:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Conjecture:&lt;br /&gt;
:[Text within the top box]&lt;br /&gt;
:It's possible to construct a convincing proof without words, pictures, or content of any kind.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Bottom box label:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Proof:&lt;br /&gt;
:[There is no text in this box.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption under the panel]&lt;br /&gt;
:Proofs without words are cool, but we can go further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DiamondNether90</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3228:_Day_Counter&amp;diff=409582</id>
		<title>3228: Day Counter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3228:_Day_Counter&amp;diff=409582"/>
				<updated>2026-04-03T21:28:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DiamondNether90: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3228&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 3, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Day Counter&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = day_counter_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 319x287px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = It has been −2,147,483,648 days since our last integer overflow.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created -.000000000000000032 days ago. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common feature of an industrial setting is a prominent sign announcing how many days have elapsed since the last workplace accident.  The sign is typically updated each day to a number one higher — or back to zero, if there ''has'' been an accident.  Such signs are intended to foster a culture of safety among the workers in the facility, since presumably no one wants to suffer the embarrassment of being the one to have caused an accident that resets the number to 0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, a similar sign highlights the number of days since the last floating-point error.  Floating-point errors occur because most computers can devote only a finite amount of storage for each {{w|Floating-point arithmetic|floating point number}} or other fraction.  However, many {{w|real numbers}} and {{w|rational numbers}} theoretically require an infinite number of digits to represent them.  For example, the ordinary fraction ⅓ is represented in decimal as 0.3333333333…, where the 3's repeat forever.  When a number is truncated to fit in the finite amount of space, precision is inevitably lost, resulting in a slight roundoff error.  Unless carefully controlled, these roundoff errors can accumulate, significantly degrading the accuracy of floating-point computations.  For example, although ⅓ + ⅓ + ⅓ should obviously equal 1, a finite-precision calculation like 0.333 + 0.333 + 0.333 might show a misleading result of 0.999. The amount of required space for rational numbers is not universal, it depends on the base used (⅓ in base 3 requires just two digits: 0.1). Floating point arithmetic standards, like the popular IEEE 754, define how and when an approximation should take place, leading to predictable results, but they don't respect some basic properties of common arithmetic operations, which someone may take for granted, e.g. in floating point arithmetic addition and multiplication are commutative (a+b=b+a; a*b=b*a), but aren't guarantied to be associative ((a+b)+c≈a+(b+c)); (a*b)*c≈a*(b*c)).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This issue is exacerbated on computers which use binary arithmetic (i.e., virtually all computers today), since in binary, the ordinary fraction 1/10 is represented as the infinitely-repeating base-2 fraction &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;0.000110011001100110011&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;….  A classic example is that, depending on circumstances, the calculation 0.1 + 0.2 might [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/588004/is-floating-point-math-broken seem to give an answer of 0.30000001].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidently, in the programming facility shown in the comic, a floating-point error has occurred today, and an attempt has been made to update the sign to say &amp;quot;It has been 0 days since...&amp;quot;.  But the number 0 is displayed incorrectly, as the very small negative number −0.00000000000000044.  Perhaps the error that was made today was the very error that occurred in updating the sign!  (This would of course violate {{w|causality}}, but in comedy, self-referential humor beats causality every time.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example of how the number −0.00000000000000044 could have arisen when 0 was intended, consider this simple {{w|C (programming language)|C}} program:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 #include &amp;lt;stdio.h&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 int main()&lt;br /&gt;
 {&lt;br /&gt;
     double d = 19;&lt;br /&gt;
     for(int i = 0; i &amp;lt; 10; i++) d -= 1.9;&lt;br /&gt;
     printf(&amp;quot;%.17f\n&amp;quot;, d);&lt;br /&gt;
 }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The program starts with the number 19, and subtracts 1.9 from it, ten times.  Mathematically, we would expect the result to be 0.  However, the number 1.9 cannot be represented exactly in binary, nor can the intermediate results 17.1, 15.2, 13.3, etc.  The cascading roundoff errors conspire to produce a result of −0.00000000000000044 instead of the expected 0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic, such an error creates the ridiculous illusion that −0.00000000000000044 days have passed, which implies a 'negative' number of days, which is impossible{{cn}}. It also, even if it was a positive number, would mean that much less than a nanosecond had passed since the last error, which would be an unfeasably short amount of time. Of course, the joke is that in making the sign showing the amount of time since a floating point error was last made, they are creating a floating point error, meaning the sign is invalid. Also, if they tried to reset the sign, they might make the same error again, repeating the cycle over &amp;amp; over, which would not be ideal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coincidentally enough, [[Cueball]] is also floating — off his seat in this case. The seat itself looks the same as the chair in [[2144]], possibly meaning making people levitate is one of its numerous settings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Floating point errors are particularly common in programming, especially in languages that implicitly convert decimal numbers to binary floating point, so an approximation is already made at conversion leading to unexpected results. The title text cites another common programming problem, integer overflow. When a value  gets bigger than the biggest integer that can be represented in a certain format, it typically &amp;quot;wraps around&amp;quot; to the smallest value. In case of 32-bit signed integers it may wrap from 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;−1 (2,147,483,647) to −2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;31&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (−2,147,483,648). 2,147,483,647 days from the comic's date of publication (April 3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;rd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 2026) is approximately October 12&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of the year 5,881,636, assuming no changes in the lengths of the day and year, or in other aspects of time measurement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strangely enough, when the comic was first published the sign number was −0.00000000000000017 days. It was changed later though, for unknown reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integer overflow was the topic of [[571: Can't Sleep]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
[White Hat, Ponytail, Cueball, and Megan are all below a large sign. White Hat and Ponytail appear to be discussing something, while Cueball is sitting at his desk working on a laptop and Megan is walking away. The sign has text on it, as well as a large display presumably meant to show a number.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Sign:] It has been&lt;br /&gt;
:[Display:] -0.00000000000000044&lt;br /&gt;
:[Sign:] days since our last floating point error&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;[[Category:Interactive comics]][[Category:Dynamic comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Programming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DiamondNether90</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1562:_I_in_Team&amp;diff=408924</id>
		<title>Talk:1562: I in Team</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1562:_I_in_Team&amp;diff=408924"/>
				<updated>2026-03-26T22:30:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DiamondNether90: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;There is no I in team, but there is an M and an E.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.56.215|162.158.56.215]] 08:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Ha, yes -- but they are backwards [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check it out! there's &amp;quot;l&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;vowels&amp;quot;! --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.89.222|141.101.89.222]] 08:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sarcasm&amp;gt;There is an (annagram of) Randal in &amp;quot;People who don't understand how a proverb works&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/sarcasm&amp;gt; No, seriously this is just cueball being a smart-ass. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.230|162.158.91.230]] 08:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's no I in team, but there is an I in pie; there's an I in meat pie and meat is an anagram of team, so... {{unsigned ip|141.101.99.82}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's a 999999 in pi. {{unsigned ip|198.41.239.32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BTW, it's called the Feynman Point. It's got a pretty interesting backstory. {{unsigned ip|162.158.72.191}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Doesn't pi contain every possible number sequence though? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.235|162.158.91.235]] 11:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No. There is no evidence that pi includes an offset of pi.&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is no I in team, but there is meat... blessed meat :::Simpson drool:: {{unsigned|Cwallenpoole}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: ''finite'' sequence. the kate bush conjecture is unproven. {{unsigned ip|141.101.98.34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Though pic is an irrational number, meaning that you could theoretically find your birthday, your SSN, even a binary representation of your DNA sequence somewhere in pi's sequence. [[User:ChromoTec|ChromoTec]] ([[User talk:ChromoTec|talk]]) 15:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)ChromoTec&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: That is ''not'' what irrational number means. Just because it cannot be expressed as a decimal does not mean that every possible decimal sequence necessarily occurs. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.118|162.158.63.118]] 13:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: To make it clear: Pi is an endless string of digits after the decimal point, and there is no repeating element at the end, and it cannot be represented by a fraction. It is easy to (falsely) conclude that, to follow this rules, there is each and every (finite) sequence in it somewhere. However it is (with enough processing time) possible to determine any finite amount of digits of pi. So let's say we analyse the first 10^10^10^10 digits of pi, and you look for your finite sequence, let's say your social security number. Either it is in it (that is no proof that EVERY number-sequence is in there), or it is not. In case it is not, there is no proof (yet?), that there is not a certain &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; after the (10^10^10^10)+1 digit, that e.g. the digit 5 is not appearing anymore. If your social security number contains a 5, it wouldn't be in pi if it's not within the first 10^10^10^10 digits, while pi's digits could still be non repeating and endless. Therefore it actually cannot be concluded that pi contains every finite sequence of numbers. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 09:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The numbers that contain all possible finite combinations of digits are called normal numbers. Square root of two, pi, ln(2), and e are all believed to be normal numbers, but there's no easy way to prove it.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.247.50|172.69.247.50]] 13:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The number 0.1101010001010001010001000001... (1 if digit is in a prime position, 0 otherwise) is irrational, but clearly doesn't contain every finite substring of numbers (consider '2'). [[User:DiamondNether90|DiamondNether90]] ([[User talk:DiamondNether90|talk]]) 22:30, 26 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The arbitrariness of this saying was demonstrated considerably more elegantly in Jeffrey Rowland's Wigu: &amp;quot;There is no I in 'team', but there is in 'family'.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.93|198.41.242.93]] 11:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This joke is not self-referential, it's metalingual. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakobson%27s_functions_of_language [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 13:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://rlv.zcache.com/i_in_team_there_it_is_hidden_in_the_a_hole_tshirt-r0aff1796c915419aaa4c3f9c73794dcf_f0yq2_1024.jpg There is]. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.185|141.101.98.185]] 16:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That's deep. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.188|108.162.229.188]] 18:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting that Randall worded Cueball's dialogue as &amp;quot;There is a 'U' in People who apparently don't understand...&amp;quot;. There is just that one 'U', in &amp;quot;understand&amp;quot;. If he'd said instead something like &amp;quot;There is a 'U' in People who apparently don't get...&amp;quot;, the reference to Hairy through 'U'/you would've been entirely allusional!&lt;br /&gt;
- Vik [[Special:Contributions/108.162.225.76|108.162.225.76]] 19:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comment is my way of noting and speculating that it makes sense that the origin of &amp;quot;No I in Team&amp;quot; is from baseball pitchers: They're the only team sport player I know of who is regularly replaced mid-game for reasons besides injury. If a pitcher thinks he's on a hot streak, but the coach replaces him because reasons, a phrase like like &amp;quot;No I in Team&amp;quot; may be needed to smooth over the resulting disagreement, regardless of whether the coach or the pitcher has their respective heads up their asses or not. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.53|199.27.133.53]] 20:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there IS an I in team! http://i.imgur.com/prPC7BX.jpg [[Special:Contributions/141.101.85.151|141.101.85.151]] 02:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's interesting that there is exactly one &amp;quot;u&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;People who apparently don't understand the relationship between orthography and meaning&amp;quot;, which has 76 letters.  &amp;quot;U&amp;quot; isn't a terribly infrequent letter.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.133|108.162.221.133]] 04:42, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The frequency of &amp;quot;u&amp;quot; is about 2.8%.  Assuming a binomial distribution, one &amp;quot;u&amp;quot; out of 76 letters is about a 25% probability.  Nothing of significance here, even though 2 &amp;quot;u&amp;quot;s would be slightly more likely. --[[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.101|198.41.235.101]] 14:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: You make it sound like the text was generated randomly.  Randall obviously chose the sentence carefully to contain a single U.  Here's a far more extreme example, an entire 50,000 word novel written without the letter E:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsby_(novel).  Should we calculate the odds of this happening?!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think part of the joke that is missed in the current explanation is that cueball is responding with a less vulgar version of the common retort: &amp;quot;But there is a 'U' in c*nt.&amp;quot;[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.188|108.162.250.188]] 09:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have to say I've never heard that retort before. I'll have to try and remember to throw it into conversation next time I get the chance! --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There is no I in team&amp;quot; is also sometimes used on voice coms for video games or other situations where the listener may not be able to identify the individual by voice, to explain why they should identify themselves in third person. --[[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.83|199.27.133.83]] 02:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this comic related to {{w|metalinguistics}}? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.71|172.69.134.71]] 00:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://conwaylife.com/w/index.php?title=User:ColorfulGalaxy/Encyclopedia_of_numbers&amp;amp;diff=156361&amp;amp;oldid=156358 There is no &amp;quot;#&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;.] [[User:ChristmasGospel|ChristmasGospel]] ([[User talk:ChristmasGospel|talk]]) 17:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DiamondNether90</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=571:_Can%27t_Sleep&amp;diff=408607</id>
		<title>571: Can't Sleep</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=571:_Can%27t_Sleep&amp;diff=408607"/>
				<updated>2026-03-21T08:57:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DiamondNether90: Tried (and probably failed) to explain signed integer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 571&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 20, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Can't Sleep&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = cant sleep.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If androids someday DO dream of electric sheep, don't forget to declare sheepCount as a long int.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is in bed and is having trouble sleeping. He tries the old standby of {{w|counting sheep}} as they jump over a fence, but upon reaching 32,767 sheep, 65535 sheep jump back over the fence and start counting up again from -32,768. This is a reference to an integer overflow, when an increasing amount (sheep in this case) suddenly overflows and shows up as a negative value. This is because when a whole number or integer is represented in a digital form, such as on a computer, the number's range is limited by the amount of space used to store it. When the greatest possible number given the storage space is exceeded, an arithmetic overflow occurs, which may result (depending on the used language among other things) in starting over at the least possible number given the storage space, similar to a car's odometer. Imagine an odometer with six digits reaching 999999. Upon driving one more mile or km, the digits will roll back over to 000000. The negative number comes from half of the possible values representing positive numbers, and half representing negative numbers. For the odometer, imagine numbers over 500000 represented negative numbers, so 500000 represented -500000, 500001 represented -499999, etc. Causing or failing to prevent integer overflow is a common mistake by programmers that may have software security consequences. Some languages like C/C++ even leaves the signed integer overflow ''undefined behavior'', it may or may not wrap to the beginning, the instruction can be ignored or may cause the software to crash.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the least and greatest possible numbers are -32,768 and 32,767, which implies that Cueball's brain would only be 16-bit. In addition, it's clear that the number is designated as a signed number, meaning that it can be either positive or negative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even if Cueball had this limitation, it would never actually pose a problem. By 32,767 sheep, at a rate of one sheep per second, Cueball has been counting for 9.101 hours (or about 9 hours 6 minutes). This would signify that he has extreme insomnia and probably needs treatment, and also that he has spent the entire night counting, and therefore would just get up and start the day rather than count sheep all over again from -32,768.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the 1968 Philip K. Dick science fiction novel ''{{w|Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?}}'', which was adapted into the perhaps more widely known Ridley Scott directed 1982 film ''Blade Runner''. The implication is that if we ever do create androids that dream of electric sheep, we should make sure to give them sufficient storage space to store numbers large enough such that an arithmetic overflow will be far less likely to occur, even if they count for a long time. A &amp;quot;long int&amp;quot; depends on machine architecture, but it typically consists of four bytes rather than two, so instead of being limited to a range from -32,768 to 32,767 the number will be capable of storing numbers from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647, which would take 68.1 years to exhaust (at the rate of 1 sheep/sec). &amp;quot;sheepCount&amp;quot; is a possible name for a variable to be used in a computer program. Declaring a variable tells the computer that it should allocate a portion of memory to be associated with the variable name given. No spaces are used because variables cannot contain spaces, for a reason that would take a little too long to properly explain here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is in bed, presumably trying to sleep. The top of each panel is a thought bubble showing sheep leaping over a fence and Cueball's counting and the sheeps baaing is written above the sheeps. Two sheep are jumping from left to right in the first panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:1... 2...&lt;br /&gt;
:Sheep: Baaa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two sheep are jumping from left to right. Cueball is holding his pillow.]&lt;br /&gt;
:... 1,306... 1,307...&lt;br /&gt;
:Sheep: Baaa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A whole flock of sheep (nine visible) is jumping over the fence from right to left; the first and last sheep is cut off at the edge of the frame. Cueball is now sitting up looking up at his thought bubble.]&lt;br /&gt;
:... 32,767 ...-32,768...&lt;br /&gt;
:Sheep: Baaa baaa baaaa baaa ba&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two sheep are again jumping from left to right. Cueball is holding his pillow over his head.]&lt;br /&gt;
:...-32,767... -32,766...&lt;br /&gt;
:Sheep: Baaa&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dreams]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Programming]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DiamondNether90</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>