<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DivePeak</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DivePeak"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/DivePeak"/>
		<updated>2026-04-13T13:04:26Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78382</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78382"/>
				<updated>2014-11-06T02:51:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have two in Randall's system as a sans-serif element, and four as a serif element. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.202|108.162.249.202]] 00:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok. Let's look at something advanced. Fe. Os. {{w|Ununtrium|Uut}}. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. Dark matter is composed entirely of cursive script elements. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Mydrane&amp;quot; is a trade mark for a company that markets miscellaneous medical supplies.  &amp;quot;Hydrane&amp;quot; is a process for coal gasification by hydrogenation, producing ideally mostly light hydrocarbon gases (mostly methane) and a minimum of liquid products.  Not clear whether either is relevant here.[[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 12:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hydrane is probally relevant.  The real Mydrane almost certainly isn't.  However, two other words come to mind;  Mydriasis (the dialation of the pupil) and Myopia (near-sightedness), which could be what was happening to us Chemistry geeks when we first saw that.  Also, the &amp;quot;compound&amp;quot; he claims to be Mydrane does somewhat resemble a pair of eyes or a pair of glasses.  -[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.137|173.245.48.137]] 17:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amount vs. number.&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation: &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the amount of valence electrons an element has.&amp;quot; Should read, &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the NUMBER of valence electrons an element has…&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Avenue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a very interesting exercise to invent a new set of symbols that WERE accurate using this system.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 12:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how relevant this is, but Hydrogen does exist in a metallic phase unde rhigh pressure and temperatures. It's liquid, though, and not crystalline. Also, C2H does also exist, but as a very unstable radical (basically an Acetylene Radical) which seems to be found in space. I have NO idea where Mydrane comes from. There are a lot of Hydrogencompounds ending with -ane (Borane, Silane, Methane), but no idea how this applies here. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.188|108.162.231.188]] 14:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: does N(itrogen) only have two bonds, or are those angles a different kind of bond (perhaps ionic vs covalent)?  If so, tungsten (W) would be interesting, for a start...  (In fact, going though the elements in my head, from the monoglyph elements it would be the most complex under this system.  The diglyphs might give Meitnerium (Mt... but was that previously Une as a systematic triglyph?) or Thulium (Tm) some interesting qualities, depending on how the system actually works.  Triglyphs are always intended to be replaced, so I think those are moot.&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, is this a serious question or are you just trolling for conspiracy nuts? Of course the conspiracy theorists will tell you that before the invention of printing all the angles were curves, and they were compressed to tight angles to make blocks of movable type smaller and cheaper. Reputable experimental chemists, however, have reported that the bonds between two tungstens is stronger than between two uraniums and we can attribute the difference to the angles. It is fairly evident that right angles (e.g. at the upper left corners of &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;P&amp;quot;) are essentially inert, and it appears that bond strength increases as the angle becomes more acute. Opposing angles (e.g. &amp;quot;K&amp;quot;) seem to Kancel each other out. This is still a very contentious topic![[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 05:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for symbols that ''are'' accurate, there are a number of systems.  Hydrogen is represented on the &amp;quot;gold discs&amp;quot; on the Voyager spacecraft (as a starting key to easily decode other information on there) but without a complete overhaul of a system, I'd imagine ''no'' advanced civilisation will have started out with &amp;quot;let's show it how it actually works&amp;quot; (accurately, and without elements such as phlogiston creeping in!) before giving arbitrary names.  Electron-orbital diagrams probably work well, though, for some things.  And something that reveals the (for example) pi-bonds works better in combinatory diagrams. I think.  It's been a while since I did any serious chemistry.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 14:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, not two.  It forms two bonds because it's got room for two more. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.105|108.162.216.105]] 16:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could Mydrane be My Dr -ane where -ane is the common ending for an alkane.  My Dr = CCH...which could be Cape Code Healthcare? ~~rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many bonds the capital letter &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have-- two or four? Seeing as how Randall writes it in this comic, I'm guessing two. Also, would it be possible for carbon to bond with itself ad infinitum in a chain which looks like the teeth on a zipper (&amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, upside-down &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, and so on)? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.177|108.162.238.177]] 00:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, Carbon can form very long chains, and also carbon rings (but only with an even number of carbon atoms).[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Assuming that you're talking Comic Universe, I don't see why it ''can't'' be an odd number of carbons in a ring.  Even if we're forced to bend round a ...∩U∩U... sort of thing (only end-connected, between characters, not end-snuggled, IYSWIM) you can have one that bends round outside of the plane of the page similar to a mobius strip and could still 'zipper' in a closed circuit with an odd number.&lt;br /&gt;
:::IRL, of course, there's {{w|Cyclopentane}} and {{w|Cyclopropane}} (3- and 5-carbon rings), among others, and {{w|Cycloundecane}} (11-carbon saturated ring, with an irregular and aperiodic &amp;quot;wiggle&amp;quot; around the circuit) shows one way that the Fictional Cyclocarbon could (just with a greater angle of bond between successive carbons, and no hydrogens involved) work with odd numbers. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 07:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::My bad - I thought the comic universe was only two dimensional and it would have to be an even number. I need to upgrade my screen! [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 02:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Me is not the designation of two carbon chains.  Methane is CH4.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.147|108.162.221.147]]rbnm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1443:_Language_Nerd&amp;diff=78380</id>
		<title>Talk:1443: Language Nerd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1443:_Language_Nerd&amp;diff=78380"/>
				<updated>2014-11-06T01:58:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I got edit-conflicted (not a problem), but if someone wants to consider canibalising/correcting my own intended contribution, and then completely delete this comment (please!), here's what it was:&lt;br /&gt;
:The English language (and others) can be, and often is, treated quite fluidly with regard to certain word forms.  For example &amp;quot;medalled&amp;quot; &amp;lt;!-- really need a link for this other than http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=medalled&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch --&amp;gt; has been coined as the act of &amp;quot;having gained a medal&amp;quot; in a sporting competition.  (Not to be confused with &amp;quot;meddled&amp;quot;.)  &amp;quot;Verbed&amp;quot; (i.e. to have made a non-verb form into a verb form) is a more long-standing example which is used in this comic without any form of meta-reference &amp;lt;!-- Future editor: Link to something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_(word_formation) perhaps? --&amp;gt; and has perhaps gained greater acceptance, already, even amongst those who might decry the other neologism.&lt;br /&gt;
:In the comic, &amp;quot;legit&amp;quot; has been newly created as an adverb, possibly from the adjective &amp;quot;legitimate&amp;quot; (confusingly, since &amp;quot;legitimately&amp;quot; already exists as a usable adverb), &amp;quot;adverb&amp;quot; has been 'verbed' into &amp;quot;adverbed&amp;quot; and it is also pointed out that the noun clause &amp;quot;language nerd&amp;quot; has been used in an adjectival context, i.e. &amp;quot;adjectived&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
And I had also made the edit summary say &amp;quot;It's probably infinitely improvable, but I've stop-gapped an initial explanation and commentified some additionalifications you might have some usiness for.&amp;quot;, but that's probably no use to anyone. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 08:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indubitably. [[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 14:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if this is also an homage to the [http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2013/01/28 Calvin and Hobbes] comic where Calvin likes to &amp;quot;verb&amp;quot; words.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.55|108.162.216.55]] 14:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Verbing words weirds language&amp;quot; came to mind when I read today's comic, but I'd forgotten the source - thanks for that! [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 01:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What group who &amp;quot;might decry the other neologism[s]&amp;quot; accepts &amp;quot;verbed&amp;quot;? [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 17:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm slightly confused about the &amp;quot;adjectived language nerd&amp;quot; claim - can someone clarify or chime in with their opinion? If &amp;quot;language nerd&amp;quot; is describing &amp;quot;go,&amp;quot; (i.e. describing the way in which he/she &amp;quot;[went] on you,&amp;quot; wouldn't you say that it was actually being adverbed (as with legit)? Or should at be interpreted as describing he/she themself, in which case I guess adjectived is correct? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.157|173.245.56.157]] 18:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are confused about the &amp;quot;adjectived language nerd&amp;quot;, I would like to point you to the discussion of this comic by linguist Geoffrey K Pullum (http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=15576) xkcd gets Pullum's stamp of approval and that is high praise indeed for linguistic matters. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.32|108.162.216.32]] 23:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78274</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78274"/>
				<updated>2014-11-04T05:09:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have two in Randall's system as a sans-serif element, and four as a serif element. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.202|108.162.249.202]] 00:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok. Let's look at something advanced. Fe. Os. {{w|Ununtrium|Uut}}. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. Dark matter is composed entirely of cursive script elements. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Mydrane&amp;quot; is a trade mark for a company that markets miscellaneous medical supplies.  &amp;quot;Hydrane&amp;quot; is a process for coal gasification by hydrogenation, producing ideally mostly light hydrocarbon gases (mostly methane) and a minimum of liquid products.  Not clear whether either is relevant here.[[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 12:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hydrane is probally relevant.  The real Mydrane almost certainly isn't.  However, two other words come to mind;  Mydriasis (the dialation of the pupil) and Myopia (near-sightedness), which could be what was happening to us Chemistry geeks when we first saw that.  Also, the &amp;quot;compound&amp;quot; he claims to be Mydrane does somewhat resemble a pair of eyes or a pair of glasses.  -[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.137|173.245.48.137]] 17:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amount vs. number.&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation: &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the amount of valence electrons an element has.&amp;quot; Should read, &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the NUMBER of valence electrons an element has…&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Avenue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a very interesting exercise to invent a new set of symbols that WERE accurate using this system.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 12:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how relevant this is, but Hydrogen does exist in a metallic phase unde rhigh pressure and temperatures. It's liquid, though, and not crystalline. Also, C2H does also exist, but as a very unstable radical (basically an Acetylene Radical) which seems to be found in space. I have NO idea where Mydrane comes from. There are a lot of Hydrogencompounds ending with -ane (Borane, Silane, Methane), but no idea how this applies here. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.188|108.162.231.188]] 14:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: does N(itrogen) only have two bonds, or are those angles a different kind of bond (perhaps ionic vs covalent)?  If so, tungsten (W) would be interesting, for a start...  (In fact, going though the elements in my head, from the monoglyph elements it would be the most complex under this system.  The diglyphs might give Meitnerium (Mt... but was that previously Une as a systematic triglyph?) or Thulium (Tm) some interesting qualities, depending on how the system actually works.  Triglyphs are always intended to be replaced, so I think those are moot.&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, is this a serious question or are you just trolling for conspiracy nuts? Of course the conspiracy theorists will tell you that before the invention of printing all the angles were curves, and they were compressed to tight angles to make blocks of movable type smaller and cheaper. Reputable experimental chemists, however, have reported that the bonds between two tungstens is stronger than between two uraniums and we can attribute the difference to the angles. It is fairly evident that right angles (e.g. at the upper left corners of &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;P&amp;quot;) are essentially inert, and it appears that bond strength increases as the angle becomes more acute. Opposing angles (e.g. &amp;quot;K&amp;quot;) seem to Kancel each other out. This is still a very contentious topic![[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 05:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for symbols that ''are'' accurate, there are a number of systems.  Hydrogen is represented on the &amp;quot;gold discs&amp;quot; on the Voyager spacecraft (as a starting key to easily decode other information on there) but without a complete overhaul of a system, I'd imagine ''no'' advanced civilisation will have started out with &amp;quot;let's show it how it actually works&amp;quot; (accurately, and without elements such as phlogiston creeping in!) before giving arbitrary names.  Electron-orbital diagrams probably work well, though, for some things.  And something that reveals the (for example) pi-bonds works better in combinatory diagrams. I think.  It's been a while since I did any serious chemistry.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 14:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, not two.  It forms two bonds because it's got room for two more. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.105|108.162.216.105]] 16:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could Mydrane be My Dr -ane where -ane is the common ending for an alkane.  My Dr = CCH...which could be Cape Code Healthcare? ~~rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many bonds the capital letter &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have-- two or four? Seeing as how Randall writes it in this comic, I'm guessing two. Also, would it be possible for carbon to bond with itself ad infinitum in a chain which looks like the teeth on a zipper (&amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, upside-down &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, and so on)? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.177|108.162.238.177]] 00:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, Carbon can form very long chains, and also carbon rings (but only with an even number of carbon atoms).[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78273</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78273"/>
				<updated>2014-11-04T05:04:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have two in Randall's system as a sans-serif element, and four as a serif element. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.202|108.162.249.202]] 00:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok. Let's look at something advanced. Fe. Os. {{w|Ununtrium|Uut}}. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. Dark matter is composed entirely of cursive script elements. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Mydrane&amp;quot; is a trade mark for a company that markets miscellaneous medical supplies.  &amp;quot;Hydrane&amp;quot; is a process for coal gasification by hydrogenation, producing ideally mostly light hydrocarbon gases (mostly methane) and a minimum of liquid products.  Not clear whether either is relevant here.[[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 12:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hydrane is probally relevant.  The real Mydrane almost certainly isn't.  However, two other words come to mind;  Mydriasis (the dialation of the pupil) and Myopia (near-sightedness), which could be what was happening to us Chemistry geeks when we first saw that.  Also, the &amp;quot;compound&amp;quot; he claims to be Mydrane does somewhat resemble a pair of eyes or a pair of glasses.  -[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.137|173.245.48.137]] 17:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amount vs. number.&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation: &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the amount of valence electrons an element has.&amp;quot; Should read, &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the NUMBER of valence electrons an element has…&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Avenue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a very interesting exercise to invent a new set of symbols that WERE accurate using this system.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 12:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how relevant this is, but Hydrogen does exist in a metallic phase unde rhigh pressure and temperatures. It's liquid, though, and not crystalline. Also, C2H does also exist, but as a very unstable radical (basically an Acetylene Radical) which seems to be found in space. I have NO idea where Mydrane comes from. There are a lot of Hydrogencompounds ending with -ane (Borane, Silane, Methane), but no idea how this applies here. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.188|108.162.231.188]] 14:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: does N(itrogen) only have two bonds, or are those angles a different kind of bond (perhaps ionic vs covalent)?  If so, tungsten (W) would be interesting, for a start...  (In fact, going though the elements in my head, from the monoglyph elements it would be the most complex under this system.  The diglyphs might give Meitnerium (Mt... but was that previously Une as a systematic triglyph?) or Thulium (Tm) some interesting qualities, depending on how the system actually works.  Triglyphs are always intended to be replaced, so I think those are moot.&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, is this a serious question or are you just trolling for conspiracy nuts? Of course the conspiracy theorists will tell you that before the invention of printing all the angles were curves, and they were compressed to tight angles to make blocks of movable type smaller and cheaper. Reputable experimental chemists, however, have reported that the bonds between two tungstens is stronger than between two uraniums and we can attribute the difference to the angles. It is fairly evident that right angles (e.g. at the upper left corners of &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;P&amp;quot;) are essentially inert, and it appears that bond strength increases as the angle becomes more acute. Opposing angles (e.g. &amp;quot;K&amp;quot;) seem to Kancel each other out. This is still a very contentious topic! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for symbols that ''are'' accurate, there are a number of systems.  Hydrogen is represented on the &amp;quot;gold discs&amp;quot; on the Voyager spacecraft (as a starting key to easily decode other information on there) but without a complete overhaul of a system, I'd imagine ''no'' advanced civilisation will have started out with &amp;quot;let's show it how it actually works&amp;quot; (accurately, and without elements such as phlogiston creeping in!) before giving arbitrary names.  Electron-orbital diagrams probably work well, though, for some things.  And something that reveals the (for example) pi-bonds works better in combinatory diagrams. I think.  It's been a while since I did any serious chemistry.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 14:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, not two.  It forms two bonds because it's got room for two more. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.105|108.162.216.105]] 16:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could Mydrane be My Dr -ane where -ane is the common ending for an alkane.  My Dr = CCH...which could be Cape Code Healthcare? ~~rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many bonds the capital letter &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have-- two or four? Seeing as how Randall writes it in this comic, I'm guessing two. Also, would it be possible for carbon to bond with itself ad infinitum in a chain which looks like the teeth on a zipper (&amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, upside-down &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, and so on)? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.177|108.162.238.177]] 00:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, Carbon can form very long chains, and also carbon rings (but only with an even number of carbon atoms).[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78270</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78270"/>
				<updated>2014-11-04T04:23:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have two in Randall's system as a sans-serif element, and four as a serif element. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.202|108.162.249.202]] 00:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok. Let's look at something advanced. Fe. Os. {{w|Ununtrium|Uut}}. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. Dark matter is composed entirely of cursive script elements. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Mydrane&amp;quot; is a trade mark for a company that markets miscellaneous medical supplies.  &amp;quot;Hydrane&amp;quot; is a process for coal gasification by hydrogenation, producing ideally mostly light hydrocarbon gases (mostly methane) and a minimum of liquid products.  Not clear whether either is relevant here.[[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 12:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hydrane is probally relevant.  The real Mydrane almost certainly isn't.  However, two other words come to mind;  Mydriasis (the dialation of the pupil) and Myopia (near-sightedness), which could be what was happening to us Chemistry geeks when we first saw that.  Also, the &amp;quot;compound&amp;quot; he claims to be Mydrane does somewhat resemble a pair of eyes or a pair of glasses.  -[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.137|173.245.48.137]] 17:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amount vs. number.&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation: &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the amount of valence electrons an element has.&amp;quot; Should read, &amp;quot;the formation of bonds between elements often relies on the NUMBER of valence electrons an element has…&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Avenue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a very interesting exercise to invent a new set of symbols that WERE accurate using this system.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 12:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how relevant this is, but Hydrogen does exist in a metallic phase unde rhigh pressure and temperatures. It's liquid, though, and not crystalline. Also, C2H does also exist, but as a very unstable radical (basically an Acetylene Radical) which seems to be found in space. I have NO idea where Mydrane comes from. There are a lot of Hydrogencompounds ending with -ane (Borane, Silane, Methane), but no idea how this applies here. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.188|108.162.231.188]] 14:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: does N(itrogen) only have two bonds, or are those angles a different kind of bond (perhaps ionic vs covalent)?  If so, tungsten (W) would be interesting, for a start...  (In fact, going though the elements in my head, from the monoglyph elements it would be the most complex under this system.  The diglyphs might give Meitnerium (Mt... but was that previously Une as a systematic triglyph?) or Thulium (Tm) some interesting qualities, depending on how the system actually works.  Triglyphs are always intended to be replaced, so I think those are moot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for symbols that ''are'' accurate, there are a number of systems.  Hydrogen is represented on the &amp;quot;gold discs&amp;quot; on the Voyager spacecraft (as a starting key to easily decode other information on there) but without a complete overhaul of a system, I'd imagine ''no'' advanced civilisation will have started out with &amp;quot;let's show it how it actually works&amp;quot; (accurately, and without elements such as phlogiston creeping in!) before giving arbitrary names.  Electron-orbital diagrams probably work well, though, for some things.  And something that reveals the (for example) pi-bonds works better in combinatory diagrams. I think.  It's been a while since I did any serious chemistry.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 14:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oxygen has 6 valence electrons, not two.  It forms two bonds because it's got room for two more. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.105|108.162.216.105]] 16:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could Mydrane be My Dr -ane where -ane is the common ending for an alkane.  My Dr = CCH...which could be Cape Code Healthcare? ~~rbnm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how many bonds the capital letter &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; would have-- two or four? Seeing as how Randall writes it in this comic, I'm guessing two. Also, would it be possible for carbon to bond with itself ad infinitum in a chain which looks like the teeth on a zipper (&amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, upside-down &amp;quot;C&amp;quot;, and so on)? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.177|108.162.238.177]] 00:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, Carbon can form very long chains, and also carbon rings (but only with an even number of carbon atoms).[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78203</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78203"/>
				<updated>2014-11-03T12:08:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. Dark matter is composed entirely of cursive script elements. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78202</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78202"/>
				<updated>2014-11-03T12:03:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous and may explode on contact. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78201</id>
		<title>Talk:1442: Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1442:_Chemistry&amp;diff=78201"/>
				<updated>2014-11-03T12:01:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What is the force that holds the two or three glyphs of an atom together called? How many bonds does the i's dot in Ti have? Ann how dangerous is comic sans cheMStry? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.39|141.101.104.39]] 06:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The letter i can only form one bond, as the other side is bonded with its dot. This is pretty basic chemestry![[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 08:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presumably hydrocarbon chains are still supported, albeit with hydrogens forming the backbone in a zip-like arrangement. You'd need phosphorous on the end, with a sans serif valence of 1. [[User:SleekWeasel|SleekWeasel]] ([[User talk:SleekWeasel|talk]]) 08:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe he is making fun of incompetent chemistry students. I've seen some draw CH4 as C-H-H-H-H, i.e. according to some random and weird rules that have nothing to do with chemistry. - This comic proposes an equally nonsensical new paradigm. - Aeneas, 3rd November 2014, 10:01 CET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crystalline structure is not like real-life crystalline carbon (neither diamond nor graphite). I removed that but someone should add a bit about it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.39|141.101.99.39]] 11:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Old English Krypton is particularly hazardous. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 12:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78042</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78042"/>
				<updated>2014-10-29T21:07:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond. If enough readers agree I think this belongs in the explanation. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Goose *is* dead. You fly jets long enough, something like this happens. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1420:_Watches&amp;diff=75832</id>
		<title>Talk:1420: Watches</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1420:_Watches&amp;diff=75832"/>
				<updated>2014-09-15T04:55:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Thinkpiece is a very Orwellian type of word, immediately reminded me of &amp;quot;doublethink&amp;quot; --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 09:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought he was mocking the word '''timepieces'''. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.62.163|173.245.62.163]] 10:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch, I didn't think of that! --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 10:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So... this cartoon is a thinkpiece about how Randall doesn't like watches? Hasn't he drawn cartoons (on other topics) which pointedly ask &amp;quot;so what?&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/103.22.201.120|103.22.201.120]] 09:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure that word applies here.  The linked article states that &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot; is used to refer to articles about opinions as opposed to facts.  The information provided in this comic is factual, showing social trends.  The comic itself also doesn't state whether or not Randall likes watches.  As for other comics, it has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  Simply adding your opinion to a presentation of facts isn't really enough to fit the usual definitions of &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot;.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 07:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't think the &amp;quot;glorious&amp;quot; gives it away? [[Special:Contributions/103.22.201.120|103.22.201.120]] 03:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love this one because it's something that's been on my mind.  I now have to wear a watch sometimes for work and I quickly found myself feeling kind of naked without it!  It's got me thinking about trends, especially phrases and ideas that flit across our collective global consciousness.  BTW I googled &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot; and there are some awesome sarcastic, rude How-to&amp;quot; articles online [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.214|108.162.249.214]] 09:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the bars for regualar watches and smartwatches resemble straps with the actual watch missing in the free space between them. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.93.220|141.101.93.220]] 10:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps 'thinkpiece' is a mockery of 'smartwatch'.  (On another note I wonder why Randall did not include the time prior to invention of wristwatches on this graph.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.210|108.162.246.210]] 21:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the scale is linear then it extends back to 1979, and it could be stretching it a little to call a chunky, battery-hogging, red LED calculator watch &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; (especially the kits!) [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1420:_Watches&amp;diff=75831</id>
		<title>Talk:1420: Watches</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1420:_Watches&amp;diff=75831"/>
				<updated>2014-09-15T04:38:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Thinkpiece is a very Orwellian type of word, immediately reminded me of &amp;quot;doublethink&amp;quot; --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 09:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought he was mocking the word '''timepieces'''. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.62.163|173.245.62.163]] 10:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch, I didn't think of that! --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 10:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So... this cartoon is a thinkpiece about how Randall doesn't like watches? Hasn't he drawn cartoons (on other topics) which pointedly ask &amp;quot;so what?&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/103.22.201.120|103.22.201.120]] 09:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure that word applies here.  The linked article states that &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot; is used to refer to articles about opinions as opposed to facts.  The information provided in this comic is factual, showing social trends.  The comic itself also doesn't state whether or not Randall likes watches.  As for other comics, it has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  Simply adding your opinion to a presentation of facts isn't really enough to fit the usual definitions of &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot;.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 07:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't think the &amp;quot;glorious&amp;quot; gives it away? [[Special:Contributions/103.22.201.120|103.22.201.120]] 03:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love this one because it's something that's been on my mind.  I now have to wear a watch sometimes for work and I quickly found myself feeling kind of naked without it!  It's got me thinking about trends, especially phrases and ideas that flit across our collective global consciousness.  BTW I googled &amp;quot;thinkpiece&amp;quot; and there are some awesome sarcastic, rude How-to&amp;quot; articles online [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.214|108.162.249.214]] 09:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the bars for regualar watches and smartwatches resemble straps with the actual watch missing in the free space between them. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.93.220|141.101.93.220]] 10:37, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps 'thinkpiece' is a mockery of 'smartwatch'.  (On another note I wonder why Randall did not include the time prior to invention of wristwatches on this graph.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.210|108.162.246.210]] 21:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the scale is linear then it stretches back to the late 1970s, and it could be stretching it a little to call a chunky red LED calculator watch &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; (especially the kits!) [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 04:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1416:_Pixels&amp;diff=74956</id>
		<title>Talk:1416: Pixels</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1416:_Pixels&amp;diff=74956"/>
				<updated>2014-09-03T21:30:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Firefox users with HTTPS Everywhere may have trouble seeing the comic, and Chrome users may experience lag (for lack of a better word) when zooming in. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.168|141.101.99.168]] 06:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The combination of &amp;quot;turtle&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pixel&amp;quot; reminded me of how to code graphics in the older days with for instance turbo pascal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtle_graphics) - Stian&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to have a &amp;quot;gallery&amp;quot; of all the zoom-in images? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.209|199.27.128.209]] 06:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the Zoom-in images have at lest one story line in them (I read one about a book launch, the book was launched to space in a rocket), I think a gallery or some such is needed for them. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.218|108.162.250.218]] 06:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I got to a white panel and there was nothing. Everything was white and zooming in or out didn't change it. Not sure if it was a bug or intended. -- [[User:Irino|Irino]] ([[User talk:Irino|talk]]) 07:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet another comic that doesn't work well on mobile. I'll probably compile a list of comics that are broken in some way for mobile... Er. Soon-ish. -RTR [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.232|108.162.246.232]] 07:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have acquired a list of images with what they zoom into, and am working on turning that into something presentable. There's a lot of images though, so it may take a day.  As for the white panel, yes, there does seem to be one broken link (out of nearly 500). I'm not sure how I would go about reporting it to get it fixed. [[User:Tahg|Tahg]] ([[User talk:Tahg|talk]]) 07:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 79 different images. I have them isolated and am uploading them now. [[User:Omixorp|Omixorp]] ([[User talk:Omixorp|talk]]) 08:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool - the images are here - if you click on the broken links they can be seen. But why are they not visible? They take up a lot of space, so I have moved them to a separate gallery page as has been done with [[1350: Lorenz]]. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think there's a problem with all thumbnails across this site - even old thumbnails don't seem to be working right now. [[User:Omixorp|Omixorp]] ([[User talk:Omixorp|talk]]) 10:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They work on Lorenz that I have linked to in my comment above. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't work at all (blank) on my Firefox and IE11. I just installed Opera and it works but it's VERY laggy. Also, I have to scroll UP to zoom in, not down. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.97.206|141.101.97.206]] 08:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Neither on Firefox 31.0. Zooming until the first level of pictures, I see them appearing. But when they are larger than ~20 pixels they start to disappear. They only reappear intermittently when I pan or zoom. When I zoom in further, only images on the left side appear intermittently. This shows the grid is built from left to right, then top to bottom, and it just stops randomly. --[[User:Zom-B|Zom-B]] ([[User talk:Zom-B|talk]]) 20:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This date of this comic (Sept 3rd 2014) coincided with the date of Randall's book, What-If. This book is shown or referenced in a number of the frames.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 09:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But the site says the book was out September 2nd... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 11:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right, 108.162.237.161. I changed it and provided proof. As far as I could find, though, it's only launched in the US as of today. [[User:NealCruco|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco|talk]]) 19:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also just isolated the images. I described the procedure on my blog: http://azttm.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/xkcd-com-1416-pixels/ [[User:Azt|Azt]] ([[User talk:Azt|Azt]]) 09:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I zoom in when I scroll up. I also like turtles. [[Special:Contributions/103.22.201.120|103.22.201.120]] 09:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this comic might be a reference to D. Hofstadter's celebrated book ''Gödel, Escher, Bach'', what with the 'holism', 'reductionism' and 'Mu' coming out at some point (there is the very same construction in one of the dialogs from that book). Plus, generally speaking, ''GEB'' is all about &amp;quot;strange loops&amp;quot; and infinite recursions. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.30|108.162.254.30]] 09:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have uploaded a graph showing the layout of the entire storyline, with thumbnails of the individual images, at [[Media:1416_Pixels_layout.png]]. --[[User:Mnw21cam|Mnw21cam]] ([[User talk:Mnw21cam|talk]]) 12:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has any attempt been made to find &amp;quot;extra&amp;quot; panels that may occur as a part of a logical series? For example, there is &amp;quot;chess-b&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;chess-w&amp;quot;, are there &amp;quot;chess-a&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;chess-c&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;chess-d&amp;quot;, etc? [[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 13:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It never occurred to you that those letters stand for Black/White? --[[User:Zom-B|Zom-B]] ([[User talk:Zom-B|talk]]) 20:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any Kerbal Space Program players on here who can shed any light on the origins of 'Need Moar Struts'? Is it a well known meme amongst the player base as I have guessed?--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an infinite series of turtles, at least 4 of them have to be youthful, genetically modified, and skilled in martial arts. Has anyone found them? [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73518</id>
		<title>Talk:1406: Universal Converter Box</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73518"/>
				<updated>2014-08-12T00:12:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would like to see what a gender changer for the petrol pump looks like... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 04:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It’s a funnel. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Im more intereted in understanding how the conversion between 87, 91 and 93 octane and Diesel is taking place -- some mini refinery most be included [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No need for a mini refinery if you simply have 4 feed lines multiplexed through a valve.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 18:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess those folks still using their ADB keyboards are out of luck.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh god... there are quite a few blank spots on that gas pump, and we all know what Randall likes to do with [http://what-if.xkcd.com/35/ tape]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.211|173.245.56.211]] 04:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where's the old Mac DIN based serial port? I've got a Color Classic I'd like to resurrect! (No, seriously. It's got a math program on it that I paid about one &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;fifteenth &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; of what they're going for today!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 05:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably related: [http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/21b3ob/walking_through_my_local_electronic_store_i_found/ HDMI — garden hose adapter] for pouring sh*t from the TV directly on your lawn. {{unsigned ip|141.101.75.19}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original Ethernet used a fat coaxial cable known as &amp;quot;Garden Hose&amp;quot;. There were no hubs or switches, each station had a 'stinger' tap clamped to the coax. I used such a setup in the 1970s. [[User:Jim E|Jim E]] ([[User talk:Jim E|talk]]) 15:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hate the fact that I can think of multiple standards that are not covered here. A gazillion DIN connectors, mini HDMI, RS232, Canon/XLR,... All the AC power adapters just on their own will weigh more than 22.7 kilograms. And seriously, how are we meant to connect our coaxial network cable to an iPhone2 with this? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 06:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: +1 [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little pissed that all those plugs and it still doesn't include an Australian 240v power plug... sigh. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 06:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: There are no power adapters in this afaik -- the title text talks about DC adapters, but they come in a separate bag [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I can see just one. I think it's the American plug, but I'm not sure (not familiar with what it looks like). It's got a removable ground pin. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.217|108.162.249.217]] 14:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Absolutely right, not sure how I missed that [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we're mentioning things Randall forgot, we have eSATA, 9-pin serial, there are at least three types of firewire, Multiple SCSI interface sizes, TRRS audio/mic connectors, 1/4&amp;quot; inch audio connectors, XLR, varous RF connectors, and a ton of power connectors. {{unsigned ip|173.245.56.210}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The STA and SCSI are mostly internal connections which users rarely had to worry about [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But there is external SCSI as well. Which sometimes needed to be manually numbered using DIP switches and properly terminated. --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing that came to my mind when I saw the magsafe 4 connector was the 'hair connector' from the avatar movie. That would really be the ultimate self-connecting magsafe successor. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.78|141.101.104.78]] 08:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the video cables in this comic actually are compatible: DVI is backwards-compatible with VGA, HDMI is (mostly) compatible with DVI, S-video is compatible with composite RCA, and SCART is compatible with VGA in addition to supporting both types of composite. Might want to note that somewhere in the article. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.195|108.162.219.195]] 08:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Display Port? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  male/female adapters has me wondering slightly...  Does the kit come with adapters for the fuel and the power plug?  Might make for a light generator.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.75|108.162.215.75]] 08:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was mildly sad to see that the token ring was not accompanied by a Tolkien ring.  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 08:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:+1 --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some more &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; items, and I'm wondering if we need to add all our suggestions in a single list to the main article.''' -- BigMal // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 12:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC keyboard DIN&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC joystick&lt;br /&gt;
:Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI)&lt;br /&gt;
:GPIB/HPIB (RS-485?) -- for electronics lab equipment (power supplies, desktop DMM, oscilloscope -- before USB and Ethernet)&lt;br /&gt;
:BNC (compostie video or analog signals)&lt;br /&gt;
:12V DC automotive power (old &amp;quot;cigarette lighter&amp;quot; port)&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-Board Diagnostic Connector (ODBC II -- automotive per SAE).&lt;br /&gt;
:Deutsch triangular SAE J1939/CAN connectors and &amp;quot;H1939&amp;quot; circular 9-pin Service Tool connector&lt;br /&gt;
:Other kinds of plumbing, inspired by the fuel pump -- US garden hose, various sizes of US NPT (National Pipe Thread?), various sizes of US &amp;quot;compression&amp;quot; thread&lt;br /&gt;
:and Pneumatic too -- all four of the most common pneumatic tool quick disconnects plus Schrader valve fitting (US standard for pneumatic tires) {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.209}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia, the 1st and 2nd gen MagSafe connectors in this image are swapped: What Randall labeled as MagSafe 1 is actually MagSafe 2 and vice-versa. [[User:Mezgrman|Mezgrman]] ([[User talk:Mezgrman|talk]]) 10:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do any of these connectors interface with the Raspberry Pi's GPIO?  (Wow, it took me surprisingly long to find the name of that.)  If not, can we add that to the list?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.41|108.162.216.41]] 13:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Floppy, IDE and SCSI IDC connectors will fit (but only using 2x13 pins of the 2x17/20/25 pins). So, no - none of these will interface directly with the Raspberry Pi. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 15:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one gender changer that bag won't have is the one for Token Ring... of all the adapters this thing can handle, I believe the Token Ring one is the only one without a gender -- one Token Ring plug plugs into another, or into the wall socket, etc. without needing to worry about whether you have a mail connector or a female one. Though I guess the Bluetooth Dongle and string also don't need adapters, pe se... [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 14:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:One Token Ring to rule them all? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the Magsafe 4 a reference to the connectors for hands and things from the movie A.I.?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the Magsafe 4 is supposed to look like those fancy auto-moving connectors from A.I. Artificial Intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.142|199.27.133.142]] 15:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magsafe 4 could also be a reference to the Na'vi tendril/braid from Avatar. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.156}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Universal Business Adapter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There might be a hidden reference to a famous [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIOqOxI0K_I IBM TV Ad] from, dunno, late 90's or so, in this. I read somewhere that the joke was lost to some viewers and IBM actually put resources into developing an &amp;quot;universal adapter&amp;quot; for business clients due to the demand. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.203|141.101.80.203]] 19:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73517</id>
		<title>Talk:1406: Universal Converter Box</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73517"/>
				<updated>2014-08-12T00:08:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would like to see what a gender changer for the petrol pump looks like... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 04:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It’s a funnel. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Im more intereted in understanding how the conversion between 87, 91 and 93 octane and Diesel is taking place -- some mini refinery most be included [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No need for a mini refinery if you simply have 4 feed lines multiplexed through a valve.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 18:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess those folks still using their ADB keyboards are out of luck.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh god... there are quite a few blank spots on that gas pump, and we all know what Randall likes to do with [http://what-if.xkcd.com/35/ tape]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.211|173.245.56.211]] 04:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where's the old Mac DIN based serial port? I've got a Color Classic I'd like to resurrect! (No, seriously. It's got a math program on it that I paid about one &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;fifteenth &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; of what they're going for today!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 05:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably related: [http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/21b3ob/walking_through_my_local_electronic_store_i_found/ HDMI — garden hose adapter] for pouring sh*t from the TV directly on your lawn. {{unsigned ip|141.101.75.19}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original Ethernet used a fat coaxial cable known as &amp;quot;Garden Hose&amp;quot;. There were no hubs or switches, each station had a 'stinger' tap clamped to the coax. I used such a setup in the 1970s. [[User:Jim E|Jim E]] ([[User talk:Jim E|talk]]) 15:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hate the fact that I can think of multiple standards that are not covered here. A gazillion DIN connectors, mini HDMI, RS232, Canon/XLR,... All the AC power adapters just on their own will weigh more than 22.7 kilograms. And seriously, how are we meant to connect our coaxial network cable to an iPhone2 with this? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 06:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: +1 [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little pissed that all those plugs and it still doesn't include an Australian 240v power plug... sigh. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 06:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: There are no power adapters in this afaik -- the title text talks about DC adapters, but they come in a separate bag [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I can see just one. I think it's the American plug, but I'm not sure (not familiar with what it looks like). It's got a removable ground pin. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.217|108.162.249.217]] 14:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Absolutely right, not sure how I missed that [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we're mentioning things Randall forgot, we have eSATA, 9-pin serial, there are at least three types of firewire, Multiple SCSI interface sizes, TRRS audio/mic connectors, 1/4&amp;quot; inch audio connectors, XLR, varous RF connectors, and a ton of power connectors. {{unsigned ip|173.245.56.210}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The STA and SCSI are mostly internal connections which users rarely had to worry about [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing that came to my mind when I saw the magsafe 4 connector was the 'hair connector' from the avatar movie. That would really be the ultimate self-connecting magsafe successor. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.78|141.101.104.78]] 08:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the video cables in this comic actually are compatible: DVI is backwards-compatible with VGA, HDMI is (mostly) compatible with DVI, S-video is compatible with composite RCA, and SCART is compatible with VGA in addition to supporting both types of composite. Might want to note that somewhere in the article. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.195|108.162.219.195]] 08:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  male/female adapters has me wondering slightly...  Does the kit come with adapters for the fuel and the power plug?  Might make for a light generator.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.75|108.162.215.75]] 08:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was mildly sad to see that the token ring was not accompanied by a Tolkien ring.  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 08:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some more &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; items, and I'm wondering if we need to add all our suggestions in a single list to the main article.''' -- BigMal // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 12:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC keyboard DIN&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC joystick&lt;br /&gt;
:Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI)&lt;br /&gt;
:GPIB/HPIB (RS-485?) -- for electronics lab equipment (power supplies, desktop DMM, oscilloscope -- before USB and Ethernet)&lt;br /&gt;
:BNC (compostie video or analog signals)&lt;br /&gt;
:12V DC automotive power (old &amp;quot;cigarette lighter&amp;quot; port)&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-Board Diagnostic Connector (ODBC II -- automotive per SAE).&lt;br /&gt;
:Deutsch triangular SAE J1939/CAN connectors and &amp;quot;H1939&amp;quot; circular 9-pin Service Tool connector&lt;br /&gt;
:Other kinds of plumbing, inspired by the fuel pump -- US garden hose, various sizes of US NPT (National Pipe Thread?), various sizes of US &amp;quot;compression&amp;quot; thread&lt;br /&gt;
:and Pneumatic too -- all four of the most common pneumatic tool quick disconnects plus Schrader valve fitting (US standard for pneumatic tires) {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.209}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia, the 1st and 2nd gen MagSafe connectors in this image are swapped: What Randall labeled as MagSafe 1 is actually MagSafe 2 and vice-versa. [[User:Mezgrman|Mezgrman]] ([[User talk:Mezgrman|talk]]) 10:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do any of these connectors interface with the Raspberry Pi's GPIO?  (Wow, it took me surprisingly long to find the name of that.)  If not, can we add that to the list?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.41|108.162.216.41]] 13:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Floppy, IDE and SCSI IDC connectors will fit (but only using 2x13 pins of the 2x17/20/25 pins). So, no - none of these will interface directly with the Raspberry Pi. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 15:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one gender changer that bag won't have is the one for Token Ring... of all the adapters this thing can handle, I believe the Token Ring one is the only one without a gender -- one Token Ring plug plugs into another, or into the wall socket, etc. without needing to worry about whether you have a mail connector or a female one. Though I guess the Bluetooth Dongle and string also don't need adapters, pe se... [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 14:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:One Token Ring to rule them all? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the Magsafe 4 a reference to the connectors for hands and things from the movie A.I.?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the Magsafe 4 is supposed to look like those fancy auto-moving connectors from A.I. Artificial Intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.142|199.27.133.142]] 15:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magsafe 4 could also be a reference to the Na'vi tendril/braid from Avatar. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.156}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Universal Business Adapter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There might be a hidden reference to a famous [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIOqOxI0K_I IBM TV Ad] from, dunno, late 90's or so, in this. I read somewhere that the joke was lost to some viewers and IBM actually put resources into developing an &amp;quot;universal adapter&amp;quot; for business clients due to the demand. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.203|141.101.80.203]] 19:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73414</id>
		<title>Talk:1406: Universal Converter Box</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73414"/>
				<updated>2014-08-11T06:04:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would like to see what a gender changer for the petrol pump looks like... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 04:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It’s a funnel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess those folks still using their ADB keyboards are out of luck.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh god... there are quite a few blank spots on that gas pump, and we all know what Randall likes to do with [http://what-if.xkcd.com/35/ tape]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.211|173.245.56.211]] 04:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where's the old Mac DIN based serial port? I've got a Color Classic I'd like to resurrect! (No, seriously. It's got a math program on it that I paid about one &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;fifteenth &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; of what they're going for today!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 05:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably related: [http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/21b3ob/walking_through_my_local_electronic_store_i_found/ HDMI — garden hose adapter] for pouring sh*t from the TV directly on your lawn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hate the fact that I can think of multiple standards that are not covered here. A gazillion DIN connectors, mini HDMI, RS232, Canon/XLR,... All the AC power adapters just on their own will weigh more than 22.7 kilograms. And seriously, how are we meant to connect our coaxial network cable to an iPhone2 with this? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 06:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1398:_Snake_Facts&amp;diff=72305</id>
		<title>Talk:1398: Snake Facts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1398:_Snake_Facts&amp;diff=72305"/>
				<updated>2014-07-25T08:22:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I thought the Worlds longest snake was so long that it took up enough space to be in Brazil, Peru, and Chile at the same time.~~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a couple of thoughts: How big was the person whose digestive tract became the longest snake in the world? Also, does the grosser end of the digestive tract develop into the head of a venomous snake? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.29|108.162.223.29]] 06:57, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a particularly important part of answering your question, but... which end of the digestive tract are you thinking is the &amp;quot;grosser end&amp;quot;? I could imagine arguments for both. [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 12:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The snake in the map shades Chile, BOLIVIA and Brazil, not Peru. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.125|108.162.229.125]] 08:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall has corrected the map on xkcd... Someone should upload the updated version. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.29|108.162.223.29]] 09:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Updated the image to match the one on xkcd.com. [[User:Nialpxe|Nialpxe]] ([[User talk:Nialpxe|talk]]) 10:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, the shading (unless randell's updated after reading this) does track chili, up the Pacific Coast, across the border with Peru and veers east into Brazil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did wonder if 'the World's longest snake' was a reference to the south American highway, part of the pan American highway. Parts were completed in the 1950's making it 'over 60years old', and does track chili as per the 'snakes' body into Peru but the brazilian section is connected elsewhere, neatly crushing my wild theory. :-( [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.161|141.101.99.161]] 09:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first factoid contains a common misconception about evolution, namely that species evolve ''only'' in small steps. It's entirely possible that a small mutation caused a protein that appeared in snakes' saliva to suddenly be ''very'' poisonous to the snake's prey or enemies. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.98|108.162.231.98]] 11:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is possible, but unlikely. Snake venom is not a single chemical, but a mixture of several enzymes and toxins. There is a lot of variation in protein structure and enzymatic properties of the constituents of different snakes' venom, which suggests a gradual shift from one or two simpler lytic enzymes to a complex mixture. Each protein could have mutated separately, but the composition of the venom of each species almost certainly developed over a prolonged period of time. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.29|108.162.223.29]] 11:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't think the implication was that every venom evolution happened in one fail swoop.  I believe he was pointing out that instead of people thinking that venom evolution started with bad breath (minuscule unnoticeable changes) more likely started with a reasonably poisonous mutation that actually benefited a snakes survival.--[[User:Bmmarti3|Bmmarti3]] ([[User talk:Bmmarti3|talk]]) 12:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Exactly what Bmmarti3 said. ''&amp;quot;the composition of the venom of each species&amp;quot;'' You mean of today's snakes. This is what we would expect for animals that have been around for almost 100M years. The venom of the first poisonous snakes was certainly weaker (and probably only worked on specific targets), but that doesn't mean it was weak. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.98|108.162.231.98]] 13:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible that the alt-text is a reference to Cyrano de Bergeracs &amp;quot;L’Autre monde ou les états et empires de la Lune&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Comical History of the States and Empires of the Moon&amp;quot;)? I don't have a proper translation, but there's a dialogue that says that every man is born with a snake inside his belly as a punishment by god.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.129|141.101.104.129]] 15:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That ive seen, Randall is usually very precise in his work.  getting a wrong breed for 'longest snake' seems odd to me.  Could the 'longest snake' be referring to either a 'longest lived' specimen, or a geographical feature named for a snake?  Or perhaps an extinct species?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.196|108.162.215.196]] 15:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think he's referring to an actual specimen that is pictured.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.49|108.162.216.49]] 18:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I second the suggestion that this is not actually referring to a species of snake, or a particular specimen even.... It seems odd that Randall would post inaccurate information about snakes for no apparent reason.  Perhaps this is a reference to something else entirely... previous dictators? Where in the World is Carmen San Diego? N'Sync reunion concerts? {{unsigned ip|108.162.246.215}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Agreed. Anaconda's are not found in Chile either... though Google says that the Anaconda Copper Company owned the largest Copper Mine in the world, located in Chile. I can't connect that factoid with the &amp;quot;more than 60 years&amp;quot; part, though. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.167|173.245.56.167]] 22:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::anaconda copper was founded in 1881, making it 'more than60 years old' - not a great connection in my book.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.196|108.162.215.196]] 15:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Anaconda Cooper got out of Chile in the 1960's, when cooper was 'chilenized' and then estatized in the 1970's.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.125|173.245.48.125]] 18:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree that some people are taking this too literally. Imagine if you approached the situation in reverse, accepting the factoids about a word that you are unfamiliar with. Our digestive tract swallows food, processes it, and evacuates the waste through a flexible wavy tube with several independent parts. The skeleton of the snake looks like a wavy line of individual segments, maybe implying where the name came from. The shaded area on the map looks pretty spot on with the location of the Andes mountain range (the longest continental mountain range on Earth and definitely believed to be over 60 years old). The top factoid is about the animal we have named after the concept of a snake as a wavy not straight staying thing. I like this idea and think I shall keep it. Thank you everyone for your help in offering inadequate information, and while that may seem sarcastic, it is not. I regularly use incorrect examples to get my mind on the correct path to good ones.[[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.74|199.27.128.74]] 06:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Created an account to accept potential wrath. [[User:JovialRoger|JovialRoger]] ([[User talk:JovialRoger|talk]]) 06:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Andes extend from north to south through seven South American countries: Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andes] The peak[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aconcagua] is in Argentina. Randall would probably take the opportunity to make the snake longer, if he had meant the Andes. Plus, no Bolivia/Peru map issue. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.223.29|108.162.223.29]] 07:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
There's an obvious reference to Ze Frank's True Facts series here, both in the amount of truth the facts have, and the use of the name Frank.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.238|108.162.210.238]] 07:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)jivadent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the 'wikipedia says' at the start of every sentence necessary?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.206|108.162.249.206]] 08:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possible reference to a YouTube video uploaded 14 Feb 2014 explaining a partial solution to the Erdos Discrepancy Problem, which includes: &amp;quot;Two steps in front of you is a nest of angry snakes. And not just any old angry snakes, but like, snakes with really bad breath and stuff&amp;quot;.  [http://youtu.be/pFHsrCNtJu4?t=39s] --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 08:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1366:_Train&amp;diff=67032</id>
		<title>Talk:1366: Train</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1366:_Train&amp;diff=67032"/>
				<updated>2014-05-09T21:15:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DivePeak: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just did an explanation from scratch for the first time, please could you tell me how I could improve it? Thanks :) [[User:Cheeselord99|Cheeselord99]] ([[User talk:Cheeselord99|talk]]) 07:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who gets [[Inflation]] when going to xkcd.com (without the www)?  This comic shows at www.xkcd.com and m.xkcd.com however.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.5|108.162.221.5]] 07:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I created an account.  The 108.162.221.5 ip address today is me, along with 108.162.221.53 today. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought today's comic was late.  http://www.xkcd.com/1366/ kept on displaying &amp;quot;Web-page not available&amp;quot; (browser thing, not server-thing), then I checked here.  So.  Oh, http://www.xkcd.com/ also...  Hmmm... That's not right.  Oh, &amp;quot;Ping request could not find host www.xkcd.com. Please check the name and try again.&amp;quot; DNS errors?  Only those trying via cached details get anything? Things are not working for xkcd.com or m.xkcd.com either.  So, DNS poisoning or human error of some kind? Not the place to discuss this, I know, sorry... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.89.211|141.101.89.211]] 10:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Explanation is good, but there are certainly related comics or maybe what-if ... I've found [http://what-if.xkcd.com/58/ Orbital Speed], but I think there were something mentioning how fast sun goes relatively to galaxy ... -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Found two related comics - any other? [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 11:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It sounds like the dark matter engine in Futurama:http://futurama.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_matter_engine&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the last paragraph, considering the situation from the point of view of multiple trains, is not relevant. The whole concept of what makes this idea funny and interesting is that you MUST view the situation from the point of view of a single train (or elevator). --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 13:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Second-last paragraph - my comment was written at the same time as another paragraph was added. --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 13:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not understand what the last paragraph is suggesting as it seems to violate the 3rd Newtonian law of motion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last paragraph is not correct, the Earth would also experience an acceleration (albeit a small one).--[[User:Sturmonium|Sturmonium]] ([[User talk:Sturmonium|talk]]) 13:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This line:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The logic of the comic also fails when taking acceleration into account. Whether the train or earth is moving can be determined by which one experiences a force due to acceleration or deacceleration when the train starts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
is incorrect, according to the principle of General Relativity. You cannot experimentally distinguish between your own acceleration against a fixed universe, and your position remaining fixed against an accelerating universe. This applies for rotation as well; if you fix the reference frame of the train rider, the acceleration of the universe creates gravity waves that cause any rider on the train to experience what feels like an acceleration. Therefore, the logic of the comic is indeed correct, even for accelerating trains. I will correct this edit.--[[User:JB Gnome|JB Gnome]] ([[User talk:JB Gnome|talk]]) 14:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: But the comic doesn't say that the train accelerates the universe: rather, it just accelerates the Earth. Does that make a difference? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.89.225|141.101.89.225]] 14:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have an idea where &amp;quot;train guy&amp;quot; is heading?  He's saying &amp;quot;almost&amp;quot;, like he's almost there but wasn't sure if there was something more.  Maybe he's timing when he needs to jump off the train? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.62|173.245.55.62]] 14:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see this comic as a nice ab absurdo for the many people who think the sun rotates around us, and further to those who claim the earth has 6 thousand years etc... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.117|108.162.242.117]] 18:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have a citation, but some traditional Polynesian navigation works using this view. Their &amp;quot;maps&amp;quot; are made of a grid of bush materials where intersections are stars or islands (possibly with a pebble tied on to represent the island). They consider the map and the earth to be connected, and you don't move along the map - the map moves. So you don't go to another island, you bring it to you. At night you move the stars to the right place, and during the day you paddle the sea and land so they are in the right place and direction.--[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DivePeak</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>