<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DruidDriver</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=DruidDriver"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/DruidDriver"/>
		<updated>2026-04-08T18:22:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1210:_I%27m_So_Random&amp;diff=39503</id>
		<title>1210: I'm So Random</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1210:_I%27m_So_Random&amp;diff=39503"/>
				<updated>2013-06-05T06:37:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1210&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 10, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = I'm So Random&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = im so random.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = In retrospect, it's weird that as a kid I thought completely random outbursts made me seem interesting, given that from an information theory point of view, lexical white noise is just about the opposite of interesting by definition.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Explanation=&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hairy]] walks up to [[Black Hat]] and proclaims that he is &amp;quot;so random&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Monkey tacos&amp;quot; is a phrase which contains two trochees. A {{w|trochee}} is a {{w|metric foot}} with one stressed beat and one unstressed beat; it may be a reference to [[856: Trochee Fixation]]. This is a reference to the Internet phenomenon in which people tend to say 'random things' and find them funny. Black Hat, being the mean and rather bullying person that he is, replies that he is also random, proving this by pouring forth a massive amount of numbers that knocks Hairy to the ground. Black Hat regains his posture at the computer, as if nothing has happened.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Hat's &amp;quot;random&amp;quot; numbers are actually quoted from [http://oeis.org/A002205 the first lines] of ''{{w|A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates}}'' making it both &amp;quot;officially random&amp;quot;, but also essentially not. (See also: [[221: Random Number]].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text elaborates on &amp;quot;random text&amp;quot;, stating that he once would have believed that Hairy's random outbursts made him interesting despite the definition of &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; meaning the opposite. {{w|White noise}} is essentially random sounds waves which taken on mass blend into audio static essentially taking on a macroscopically uniform sound experience despite their random nature. This can be used in some sleep or relaxation therapies, which foils well with the random assault experienced in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Transcript=&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy approaches Black Hat, who is at a computer.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: Monkey Tacos! I'm so random.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Yeah, me too.&lt;br /&gt;
:[A massive speech bubble comes out of Black Hat's mouth, filled with random numbers, knocking Hairy to the ground.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat resumes work at his computer, as if nothing has happened.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1167:_Star_Trek_into_Darkness&amp;diff=27936</id>
		<title>1167: Star Trek into Darkness</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1167:_Star_Trek_into_Darkness&amp;diff=27936"/>
				<updated>2013-02-15T03:56:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1167&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 29, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Star Trek into Darkness&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = star_trek_into_darkness.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Of course, factions immediately sprang up in favor of '~*~sTaR tReK iNtO dArKnEsS~*~', 'xX_StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNess_Xx', and 'Star Trek lnto Darkness' (that's a lowercase 'L').&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
The talk page of a Wikipedia article is used to discuss changes to the article. An &amp;quot;edit war&amp;quot; is a dispute about a specific edit to an article should be made, which often manifests as a series of edits alternatingly making and reverting the change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here, [[Randall]] is referring to a {{w|Talk:Star Trek into Darkness#Requested move|talk page discussion}} on the Wikipedia article about ''{{w|Star Trek Into Darkness}}'' (an upcoming Star Trek film) about whether to capitalize the word &amp;quot;into.&amp;quot; Wikipedia is {{w|WP:LAME|no stranger}} to lengthy battles over such trivial topics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] suggests a compromise, and changes the title so that every other letter is capitalized and adds framing tildes and asterisks. This will probably not go over well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Megan's line of &amp;quot;They should have sent a poet.&amp;quot; is a quote from the film ''{{w|Contact (film)|Contact}}''; the quote appears in other xkcd comics, such as [[482: Height]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text indicates Randall's belief that such arguments are perpetual and will always arise; he suggests that the edit in the comic will result in a dispute over whether his new title should be framed by tildes and asterisks, or by Xs (two common ways of emphasising titles online which are generally considered to be childish). The third option is the proper title of the film with a lowercase &amp;quot;L&amp;quot; in place of the capital &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;. Because these characters appear similar in many fonts, there is a potential argument that the character in the movie's title is a lowercase L, although the word &amp;quot;Lnto&amp;quot; would make no sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the comic chose to use the lower case tittle which allows for a handy and perhaps ironic abreviation. STD which is also the abreviation for sexually transmitted diseases. Perhaps an implication is being made regarding wiki editing being similar. Perhaps a critique of the reboot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball staring at computer screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Oh, wow. Look at Wikipedia's Talk page for Star Trek into Darkness. I have a new favorite edit war.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan (off-panel): Oh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Forty ''thousand'' words of debate over whether to capitalize &amp;quot;into&amp;quot; in the movie's title. Still no consensus.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: That's ''magnificient''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: It's breathtaking.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: They should have sent a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Well I'm making an executive decision. I hope both sides accept this as a fair compromise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A wikipedia page titled &amp;quot;~*~ StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs ~*~&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1162:_Log_Scale&amp;diff=26115</id>
		<title>Talk:1162: Log Scale</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1162:_Log_Scale&amp;diff=26115"/>
				<updated>2013-01-24T20:46:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The fictional notation MAY BE a parody of Knuth's up-arrow notation - and uranium MAY BE an effective energy source. By the way, labeling the energy sources just with material name is insufficient: how good energy source is hydrogen? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It has a calorific value of about 150 kJ/gm(much higher when compared to coal,etc.) but is too explosive[[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 14:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That is for burning it I assume? But what if you use it as fuel in a fusion reactor? Or an H-Bomb for that matter?&lt;br /&gt;
The calorie standard is defined by burning. So comparison doesn't fit with the graph as written. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 20:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:is it really a parody? (well, probably arrow notation grows much more, here there is just a log log log etc) --[[User:.mau,|.mau.]] ([[User talk:.mau,|talk]]) 14:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It's true that uranium has an extremely high energy density, which is of great importance for mobile power plants; however, nuclear fission has a lot of safety issues, especially for mobile power, which is why it is used only for stationary power plants and large military vessels, such as aircraft carriers and subs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen is pretty good when highly compressed so as to get high energy volume density as well, but that leads to problems too.  Also, hydrogen leaks more easily than almost anything else.  That is especially a problem for an extremely flammable gas.  On the plus side for hydrogen, nothing burns more cleanly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The log scale can also be abused to make data look more uniform than it really is, so on a log scale sugar and other materials would look largely equal energy density when they clearly are not.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is missing the point, which I take to be that displaying the data on a log scale would understate the vast difference between ''uranium'' and the hydrocarbons/carbohydrates:&lt;br /&gt;
            E/m   log(E/m)&lt;br /&gt;
 sugar      19   1.3  *&lt;br /&gt;
 coal       24   1.4  *&lt;br /&gt;
 fat        39   1.6  **&lt;br /&gt;
 gas        46   1.7  **&lt;br /&gt;
 uranium   76e6  7.9  ****.***&lt;br /&gt;
Uranium is clearly larger than the others, but only by a factor of 4, so the real magnitude of the difference may not be appreciated. &lt;br /&gt;
With the stack of paper, he's proposing a way to show linear values for the data without having the uranium column simply shooting off the top of the page, with an arrow and the number. [[User:Wwoods|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods|talk]]) 17:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: or, he could just print at a scale that allows 76,000,000 to fit on the page, with the other values shown as near-infinitesimally thin lines. [[Special:Contributions/67.51.59.66|67.51.59.66]] 18:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A googolplex in Knuth's paper stack notation (based upon 3818 chr per page, and 25,824 pages to fill up a typical 8ft tall room), would be:&lt;br /&gt;
96.41816408 with a 2 pinned on it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The algorithim is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
KnuthPaperStack(N):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
y = log10(N)/3818&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If y &amp;gt;= 25824&lt;br /&gt;
  Z = Z + 1&lt;br /&gt;
  z = KnuthPaperStack(y)&lt;br /&gt;
  Return z,Z&lt;br /&gt;
Else&lt;br /&gt;
  Return y,Z&lt;br /&gt;
End if&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Markozeta|Markozeta]] ([[User talk:Markozeta|talk]]) 15:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the name &amp;quot;Knuth paper-stack notation&amp;quot; sounds like &amp;quot;'Nuff paper-stack notation&amp;quot;, meaning that it is a notation in which you need &amp;quot;enough paper&amp;quot; to stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:NiccoloM|NiccoloM]] ([[User talk:NiccoloM|talk]]) 00:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't there a pun on Log which is itself an energy source as well as being the source of any reams of paper used to record values.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/192.11.175.219|192.11.175.219]] 06:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1141:_Two_Years&amp;diff=26032</id>
		<title>1141: Two Years</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1141:_Two_Years&amp;diff=26032"/>
				<updated>2013-01-23T21:22:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1141&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 30, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Two Years&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = two years.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = She won the first half of all our chemo Scrabble games, but then her IV drugs started kicking in and I *dominated*.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic marks the second year of [[Randall Munroe]]'s wife's battle with cancer, and appears to depict actual events from those two years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some explanations:&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 1: Randall's wife-to-be (at that point) receives a diagnosis over the phone as Randall sits by her side supportively.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 2: Undergoing IV (intravenous) {{w|chemotherapy}}. Because of the hair loss that results from chemotherapy, many patients opt to shave their heads when they undergo chemotherapy. Her hair grows back over the course of the following panels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 3: The two of them spending time alone together. &lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 4: The couple are waiting for the results of a scan. A phone is on the middle of the table that they are waiting to ring.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 5: More chemotherapy. The couple are playing {{w|Scrabble}}, in which players use letter tiles to spell words in a cross-word style. She uses the fact that she has cancer as leverage to get Randall to ignore the fact that the word she has played (zarg) is not a real word.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 6: Someone suggests they come for a visit next year, but all they can think about are the words &amp;quot;next year&amp;quot;, indicating that they know the future is very much in doubt. &lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 7: They get married.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 8: The couple watching {{w|humpback whales}}.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 9: Randall is paraphrasing a line from the song &amp;quot;{{w|Still Alive}}&amp;quot; ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_S0PGu-cH4 video]) from the video game ''{{w|Portal}}'' (''&amp;quot;I'm doing science and I'm still alive&amp;quot;'').&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 10: The two of them sit under a tree reflecting on the significance of the past two years.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel 11: Randall and his wife have dinner to celebrate the fact that she has made it two years since her {{w|biopsy}}.&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is referring to a possible {{w|Chemotherapy#Neurological adverse effects|side-effect of chemotherapy drugs}}, the inability to concentrate. The emphasis through quotes on dominate may mean that one of the words he used to win was actually dominate. This 8 letter word would likely use up all or most of his letters and potentially earn a bonus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée sitting on a bed. She's on the phone with a doctor (shown in inset), who is looking at a clipboard.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Doctor: [illegible] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's fiancée: Oh God &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée sitting at their laptops. Randall's fiancée is hooked up to an IV pump and her head is shaved.] &lt;br /&gt;
:IV pump: ...BEEEP...BEEEP...BEEEP... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée rowing a canoe in a lake/mountain setting. Randall's fiancée is wearing a beanie.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée sitting at a table staring at a phone. A clock is mounted behind them. Her head is stubbly.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's fiancée: How long can it take to read a scan!? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée playing scrabble. Randall's fiancée is again hooked up to an IV pump. She has longer stubbles.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: &amp;quot;Zarg&amp;quot; isn't a word. &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's fiancée: But Caaancer. &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: ...Ok, fine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée talking to a friend. A large thought bubble is above their heads. She's wearing a beanie.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Friend: So next year you should come visit us up in the mountain - [cut off by thought bubble] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall and Randall's fiancée: &amp;quot;Next year&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's fiancée getting married. He's wearing a bow-tie; she a white dress. A heart is above their heads. Randall's wife's hair is growing back a little.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's wife standing on the coast, watching a whale jump out of the water. She's wearing a beanie.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall standing behind Randall's wife, who is sitting at a desk using a laptop. Her hair has grown back a little more.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: Hey- &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: You're doing science, &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: And you're still alive. &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's wife: Yeah! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's wife sitting under a tree.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall: It's really only been two years? &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's wife: They were big years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Randall and Randall's wife at a fancy restaurant being served. Her hair has grown back more.] &lt;br /&gt;
:Waiter: Happy... Anniversary? &lt;br /&gt;
:Randall's wife: Biopsy-versary! &lt;br /&gt;
:Waiter: ...eww. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Randall Munroe]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Romance]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cancer]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1133:_Up_Goer_Five&amp;diff=25972</id>
		<title>Talk:1133: Up Goer Five</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1133:_Up_Goer_Five&amp;diff=25972"/>
				<updated>2013-01-23T01:55:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Isn't this comic essentially just saying 'rocket science: not actually as complicated as the phrase &amp;quot;it's not rocket science&amp;quot; would have us beleive'{{unsigned|203.211.80.97}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is also a celebration of what many people, presumably including former NASA employee Randall, consider the greatest technological achievement ever. {{unsigned|158.169.131.14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised &amp;quot;ship&amp;quot; isn't among the most commonly used words in English. Where do these statistics come from? [[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;(talk)&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 12:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It makes sense that &amp;quot;capsule&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;spaceship&amp;quot; (as one word) are not in the &amp;quot;ten hundred&amp;quot; most-common words (Really, &amp;quot;thousand&amp;quot; isn't on this list either?), but not &amp;quot;fuel&amp;quot; and/or &amp;quot;tank&amp;quot;?  People (context: US Midwesterner) talk about filling up their cars all the time!  I'd like to see the original 1,000-word list. (Also: &amp;quot;Up Goer&amp;quot;?  Well, it goes up -- that's about ALL it does.  Makes sense, I guess.) --BigMal27 // [[Special:Contributions/192.136.15.149|192.136.15.149]] 13:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe is Randall referring to [[wikipedia:Simplified Technical English|Simplified Technical English]]? — [[User:Ethaniel|Ethaniel]] ([[User talk:Ethaniel|talk]]) 14:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is an entry in the Simple English Wikipedia: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_English . The Simple English Wikipedia is interesting to browse, and challenging to write articles for. [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 14:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Look up Basic English. It is the 850 most used words (or rather the 850 most used words when it was invented in 1930). According to Wikipedia it is still used in some countries as the basic vocabulary to first teach in English. The list of words is here: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Basic_English_word_list . It looks like this could be what he used.i[[User:Carewolf|Carewolf]] ([[User talk:Carewolf|talk]]) 17:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: The 850 Basic English word list includes &amp;quot;liquid&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;second&amp;quot; but does not include &amp;quot;world&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;five&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;third&amp;quot;  so we're still looking for the vocabulary list.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm inclined to think this is also a nod to 1984's {{w|Newspeak}}, and the dumbing-down effect of an ''overly'' {{w|controlled language}}.  It's good to simplify (linguistic) complexity, but with that simplification of text comes a simplification of capacity, too.  We push back horizons by exploring unknowns, so restricting things to a small set of knowns may be counterproductive. -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the very point I am trying to make time and again. Some topics cannot be correctly explained to everyone. BTW XKCD #547 had a similar point.&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is almost certainly using http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Basic_English_word_list or another work list like it.[[Special:Contributions/82.16.27.115|82.16.27.115]] 16:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase in the explanation &amp;quot;Helium is much less prone to catching fire&amp;quot; brought a smile to my lips as there is literally &amp;lt;SIC&amp;gt; nothing less prone to catching fire than Helium. [[Special:Contributions/90.208.12.4|90.208.12.4]] 23:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Unfortunately some pedant has changed it to the technically correct, but much less smile-inducing &amp;quot;inflammable&amp;quot;. Pitty, it made me smile too.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 23:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Edit: I've reverted it, because the whole edit was fraught with incorrect minor changes. 23:27, 12 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Inflammable is '''wrong'''. It means the same as flammable. If you mean 'incapable of burning', the opposite of flammable/inflammable is ''nonflammable''. This is one of the subtleties of English which is avoided by using a greater number of simple words! [[Special:Contributions/87.252.61.205|87.252.61.205]] 13:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wouldn't say Helium is least prone to catching fire. Sure, it's least prone to chemical reaction, but it is prone to nuclear fusion, which looks sort of like fire. On the other hand Iron, while it can be oxygenated, doesn't really catch fire doing that and I doubt it can chemically react in a way which would look that way. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fire is strictly defined as the rapid oxidation of a substance in the presence of heat - nuclear fusion is transmutation, not combustion. Iron can undergo a thermite reaction which makes spectacular flying flames. Youtube should have a billion videos of thermite reactions for your perusal. [[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;(talk)&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fine steel wool (such as 0000 grade) burns exceedingly well. A survival technique is to use flashlight batteries to make a spark in the steel wool, which then becomes an excellent fire starter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the comic can't use the actual words, it took me some time to find Wikipedia's articles that describe the actual &amp;quot;up goer.&amp;quot;  In case there's anybody like me who wanted to know more details, I found the {{w|Apollo (spacecraft)}} and {{w|Saturn V}} articles to be very interesting and relevant.  BTW, &amp;quot;that stuff they burned in lights before houses had power&amp;quot; is {{w|RP-1|highly refined kerosene}}. [[User:S|S]] ([[User talk:S|talk]]) 00:34, 13 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for doing the research! I've incorporated this into the explanation. Feel free to add more if you think it needs more. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 01:33, 13 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like your additions.  Much better than what I could come up with! [[User:S|S]] ([[User talk:S|talk]]) 23:44, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be pretty nice for a day if everyone just spoke using the most used thousand words in his respective language. Just off hand, describing the band name &amp;quot;Led Zeppelin&amp;quot; would certainly be a treat--[[User:Dangerkeith3000|Dangerkeith3000]] ([[User talk:Dangerkeith3000|talk]]) 18:10, 13 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyone who will not be fired off trying to only speak the most used thousand words for workday is working manually or not at all. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Or is a school teacher, or working primarily with people who have language difficulties...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think NASA should rebrand themselves &amp;quot;US Space Team&amp;quot; it's so much cooler than the &amp;quot;National Aeronautics and Space Administration&amp;quot;! --[[User:NHSavage|NHSavage]] ([[User talk:NHSavage|talk]]) 07:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not once heard the word &amp;quot;goer&amp;quot; before this.  Thousand most common?  [[Special:Contributions/67.52.144.154|67.52.144.154]] 16:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall used the verb &amp;quot;to go&amp;quot; and as it's a verb, any conjugation could be considered the same word. I think that's where he got &amp;quot;goer&amp;quot; from. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  16:29, 15 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, not a conjugation, a different part of speech. That's a slightly more extreme leap than a change of inflection, but probably still allowable for these purposes. [[User:Jerodast|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast|talk]]) 15:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone has made an &amp;quot;Up-Goer Five Text Editor&amp;quot;, with a link to a (the?) ten-hundred wordlist: http://splasho.com/upgoer5/.  [[Special:Contributions/83.233.5.126|83.233.5.126]] 18:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm having trouble believing that lift off is not on the common word list. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 01:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1131:_Math&amp;diff=25969</id>
		<title>1131: Math</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1131:_Math&amp;diff=25969"/>
				<updated>2013-01-23T00:25:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1131&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 7, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Math&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = math.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = As of this writing, the only thing that's 'razor-thin' or 'too close to call' is the gap between the consensus poll forecast and the result.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In another election-themed comic (this one posted the day after the {{w|United States presidential election, 2012|2012 U.S. presidential election}} (see [[1122: Electoral Precedent]], [[1127: Congress]], and [[1130: Poll Watching]]), this comic shows a bar graph representing expected (see note below) electoral college votes in the election, including a dotted line indicating the 270 votes needed to win, a span of projections (&amp;quot;Forecast&amp;quot;), and the actual result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The forecast range is above the 270 line, showing that Obama (the 'Blue Candidate' according to convention since the 2000 election) was always projected to win by statisticians like Nate Silver and others. The only question among these people was how much he was going to win by. By contrast, most of the media was calling the election too close to call, and some news outlets actually projecting a Romney win. Essentially the combined pressures of, right wing self referencing media denial, the large number of republican pundits, and the desire for media to give any issue two dramatically or fictionally equal voices (for fairness) resulted in a lot of talking heads disbelieving the polls. Thus their belief became news which leads to the punch line of this story. You don't need to believe in science or statistics for it to effectively describe or predict reality. The progressively more radicalized republicans of this era are known for disregarding scientific or statistical consensus which reflects reality but does not conform to their world view. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those unfamiliar with the US Presidential electoral process: unlike other political offices, the election for president is not a direct election.  Instead, each state is apportioned a certain number of &amp;quot;electoral college&amp;quot; votes based on population.  For the most part (and there is perennial discussion on whether this should be changed) the candidate that receives the most votes in a given state receives all the electoral college votes for that state.  With 538 electoral votes total, receiving 270 electoral college votes ((half of 538) + 1) is sufficient to be declared president-elect.  For this reason, it is possible to have one candidate actually receive more &amp;quot;popular&amp;quot; votes (more people voted for the candidate,) but have fewer electoral college votes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electoral college votes are expectations until the official voting in early November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Heading: Math&lt;br /&gt;
:[Bar chart showing 58% blue and 42% red. Header showing range between 53-63% with heading &amp;quot;Forecast&amp;quot;.  Arrow below pointing at meeting of blue and red sections of graph with heading &amp;quot;Result&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
:Caption: '''Breaking:''' To surprise of pundits, numbers continue to be best system for determining which of two things is larger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1127:_Congress&amp;diff=25968</id>
		<title>1127: Congress</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1127:_Congress&amp;diff=25968"/>
				<updated>2013-01-23T00:17:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Political ideologies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1127&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 29, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Congress&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = congress.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = It'd be great if some news network started featuring partisan hack talking heads who were all Federalists and Jacksonians, just to see how long it took us to catch on.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Click the date above the comic to go to the xkcd page, and there is a link to the much larger version. Go find something interesting, don't worry, the wiki will still be here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
It appears that the {{w|United States presidential election, 2012|upcoming 2012 election}} has put [[Randall]] into a political state of mind, as this is the second comic in a few weeks that has dealt with political history ([[1122: Electoral Precedent]]). As with that comic, this comic goes through the entire history of the {{w|Federal government of the United States|U.S. Federal Government}}. Also notably, Randall makes a number of observations that are akin to the type of observations Randall denounces in 1122 (e.g. for 1928, Randall notes that no Republican has since won the presidency without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U.S. Federal Government===&lt;br /&gt;
In the {{w|Federal government of the United States|U.S. Federal Government}}, one of the {{w|Separation of powers|checks and balances}} is a {{w|bicameralism|bicameral}} {{w|United States Congress}}, which consists of two &amp;quot;houses&amp;quot;: the {{w|United States Senate|Senate}}, its &amp;quot;upper&amp;quot; house; and the {{w|United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives}} (&amp;quot;the House&amp;quot;), its &amp;quot;lower house&amp;quot;. The Senate consists of 2 senators elected from each state (thus 100 total), while the House consists of 435 voting representatives (a number decided upon in {{w|Apportionment Act of 1911|1911}} by law) whose {{w|United States congressional apportionment|apportionment}} is split between the states proportional to their population; although each state gets at least one (the House also has non-voting representatives from unincorporated territories like {{w|Puerto Rico}} and the {{w|District of Columbia}}). Every ten years, the House is reapportioned based on the latest census. The most populous state as of 2012 is California which has 53 seats in the House. Senators serve 6-year terms with elections held every 2 years for one-third of the seats. Members of the House (called Representatives or Congressmen/women) serve 2-year terms with all of the seats contested every 2 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order for a bill to become a law, it must be passed by both the House and the Senate. In a way, this theoretically ensures that the bill is supported both by the majority of states (the Senate), and the majority of the population (the House). The President may then sign the bill into law, he may &amp;quot;veto&amp;quot; the bill, or he may do nothing, in which case it becomes a law if and only if Congress is in session after a waiting period of 10 days (not including Sundays).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political ideologies===&lt;br /&gt;
In politics, there is a {{w|political spectrum|scale}} that represents the political beliefs of a politician. The scale goes from &amp;quot;{{w|Left-wing politics|left}}&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;{{w|Right-wing politics|right}}&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;center&amp;quot; - which generally describes a balancing point of beliefs (sometimes called &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; is a general belief in social justice, and is sometimes associated with {{w|socialism}}. Modern left-wingers generally  mandate equality, and support policies like welfare and government-subsidized healthcare. This trends toward having a larger federal government. In the U.S., &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is a term often used to denote left-leaning tendencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; generally believe in conserving the social and economic status quo, which is often termed {{w|conservatism|conservative}}. This trends towards having  less regulation and thereby a smaller federal government. The goal is to keep the nation stable, and reducing the interference by the government with a person's wealth. This ostensibly means lower taxes, because the government does not provide as much.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Politicians typically align themselves into groups of similar beliefs and positions called &amp;quot;parties&amp;quot;. In the U.S., there have generally been two dominant parties (although there have been times where three or more parties have shared roughly equal influence and support. In today's politics (which is apparently known as the fifth era of political parties, or {{w|Fifth Party System}}, as noted on the outside edges of the comic)  of the two current primary U.S. political parties, the {{w|Democrats}} are the left-leaning party, and the {{w|Republicans}} are the right-leaning party. The dominant parties are generally considered  &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; in their left- or right-wing leanings, as either party appears to requires the support of a majority (or a few percent under) of voters to win In actuality a process called gerrymandering where election boundaries are redrawn to allow a political advantage to the party currently in power. Thus a popular majority state wide or any ratio of votes to representatives will not nescisarily be reflected in delegates awarded. An example being the republicans REDMAP 2012 report ([http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/21/16630863-virginia-republicans-move-for-permanent-majorit]y)  Smaller parties often run candidates with more extreme views, but such candidates rarely win, due to a more limited number of possible supporters ensuring that even a relatively large minority would have zero chance of representation. (see {{w|Duverger's law}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The comic===&lt;br /&gt;
The comic effectively consists of three separate charts: The left- and right-hand charts are the main charts; they represent the Senate and House respectively, and purport to show the left- and right-wing leanings of each legislature through U.S. history. There is a legend on the right that sets out fairly clearly how the charts work, but basically Randall has split each wing into three levels including the very moderate or &amp;quot;Center&amp;quot; right or left, and the more extreme or &amp;quot;Far&amp;quot; right or left, as well as the average left and right, without prefix. A dotted yellow line represented the balance of power in each legislature, and white lines represent the leanings of certain notable people including presidents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some presidents are not indicated, because they were never senators or congressmen (most of these were state Governors, such as {{w|Bill Clinton|Clinton}}, {{w|George W. Bush|Bush}} and 2012 candidate {{w|Mitt Romney}}). As may be noted from the chart, {{w|Barack Obama}} is considered &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; while {{w|Paul Ryan}} is considered &amp;quot;far right&amp;quot;. It's also notable that the &amp;quot;center right&amp;quot; ideology appears to be completely eradicated from the House and is waning in the Senate [http://xkcd.com/859/  (although a similar trend is shown around 1900 with the centrists making a comeback thereafter.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On either side of these charts, there are descriptions or explanations for expansions and contractions of each ideological group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The center chart appears to primarily act as a timeline. Each president is listed with their leanings indicated by a left or right arrow. Wars are shaded in grey. Other notable events are also indicated. On either side of the center chart (although somewhat mixed in with the aforementioned Senate/House explanations), there are also references to the primary parties of each era showing how they evolved (left-leaning parties on the left, and right-leaning parties on the right).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, there's a little extra commentary on the right side, below the legend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:A history of&lt;br /&gt;
:'''The United States Congress'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Partisan and ideological makeup&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic is divided into three massive sections, SENATE, PRESIDENCIES, and HOUSE. Timelines run backwards down the page between each section. In the HOUSE and SENATE sections, shifting, curving red and blue areas of different brightness illustrate the shifting balance of power between &amp;quot;Members of Left-Leaning Parties&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Members of Right-Leaning Parties&amp;quot;. Under PRESIDENCIES, different administrations are labeled and wars are shaded in gray. There are notes throughout all sections.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[There are additional notes on the right.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LEGEND&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square containing ribbons of color merging upwards with larger areas]'': Branches join in when new members enter Congress and cause an ideological bloc to grow. (Note: If the new member is elected as another retires from the same ideological bloc, no change is shown.)&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square containing ribbons of color splitting off from larger areas]'': Branches split off when members leave Congress, causing their ideological bloc to shrink. (Note: If the new member is elected as another retires from the same ideological bloc, no change is shown.)&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square showing yellow dotted line crossing from red to blue area]'': The yellow line marks the midpoint, which indicates which side has control of the chamber.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square in which curve briefly separates from blue area]'': If a bloc loses members in one election and gains them in the next, the exiting stream may rejoin. This does not necessarily mean the same people returned.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square showing white dashed line labeled Lyndon Johnson on top of ribbon merging with main area]'': Future (and past) US Presidents who served in Congress are shown with white dashed lines. Other noteworthy members are shown with thin solid lines.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square in which tinted area marked &amp;quot;Whig&amp;quot; sits over mix of red and blue areas]'': Tinted white outlines mark the approximate membership of some of the smaller political parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HOW IDEOLOGY IS CALCULATED&lt;br /&gt;
::Each member of Congress is assigned to an ideological category using DW-NOMINATE, a statistical system created by political scientists Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. This system rates each member of Congress's ideological position position [sic] based on their votes.&lt;br /&gt;
::DW-NOMINATE is purely mathematical and involves no judgement on the content of bills. Instead, members of Congress are placed on a spectrum based on how consistently they vote together.&lt;br /&gt;
::While people argue that ideology is many-dimensional, Poole and Rosenthal found that nearly all Congressional voting behavior - especially in the modern era - can be accurately predicted by using just one ideological variable.&lt;br /&gt;
::This variable turns out to roughly correspond to position on the classic economic liberal/conservative spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
::Because members of Congress have served in overlapping terms with past members in a chain back to the first Congress, the system allows comparison of ideology across time - even accounting for individual members' ideological drift. (Note: Scores are comparable across time but not between chambers.)&lt;br /&gt;
::For more detail, see Poole and Rosenthal's website, voteview.com.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Large drawings]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1127:_Congress&amp;diff=25967</id>
		<title>1127: Congress</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1127:_Congress&amp;diff=25967"/>
				<updated>2013-01-22T23:35:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Political ideologies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1127&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 29, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Congress&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = congress.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = It'd be great if some news network started featuring partisan hack talking heads who were all Federalists and Jacksonians, just to see how long it took us to catch on.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Click the date above the comic to go to the xkcd page, and there is a link to the much larger version. Go find something interesting, don't worry, the wiki will still be here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
It appears that the {{w|United States presidential election, 2012|upcoming 2012 election}} has put [[Randall]] into a political state of mind, as this is the second comic in a few weeks that has dealt with political history ([[1122: Electoral Precedent]]). As with that comic, this comic goes through the entire history of the {{w|Federal government of the United States|U.S. Federal Government}}. Also notably, Randall makes a number of observations that are akin to the type of observations Randall denounces in 1122 (e.g. for 1928, Randall notes that no Republican has since won the presidency without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U.S. Federal Government===&lt;br /&gt;
In the {{w|Federal government of the United States|U.S. Federal Government}}, one of the {{w|Separation of powers|checks and balances}} is a {{w|bicameralism|bicameral}} {{w|United States Congress}}, which consists of two &amp;quot;houses&amp;quot;: the {{w|United States Senate|Senate}}, its &amp;quot;upper&amp;quot; house; and the {{w|United States House of Representatives|House of Representatives}} (&amp;quot;the House&amp;quot;), its &amp;quot;lower house&amp;quot;. The Senate consists of 2 senators elected from each state (thus 100 total), while the House consists of 435 voting representatives (a number decided upon in {{w|Apportionment Act of 1911|1911}} by law) whose {{w|United States congressional apportionment|apportionment}} is split between the states proportional to their population; although each state gets at least one (the House also has non-voting representatives from unincorporated territories like {{w|Puerto Rico}} and the {{w|District of Columbia}}). Every ten years, the House is reapportioned based on the latest census. The most populous state as of 2012 is California which has 53 seats in the House. Senators serve 6-year terms with elections held every 2 years for one-third of the seats. Members of the House (called Representatives or Congressmen/women) serve 2-year terms with all of the seats contested every 2 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order for a bill to become a law, it must be passed by both the House and the Senate. In a way, this theoretically ensures that the bill is supported both by the majority of states (the Senate), and the majority of the population (the House). The President may then sign the bill into law, he may &amp;quot;veto&amp;quot; the bill, or he may do nothing, in which case it becomes a law if and only if Congress is in session after a waiting period of 10 days (not including Sundays).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political ideologies===&lt;br /&gt;
In politics, there is a {{w|political spectrum|scale}} that represents the political beliefs of a politician. The scale goes from &amp;quot;{{w|Left-wing politics|left}}&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;{{w|Right-wing politics|right}}&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;center&amp;quot; - which generally describes a balancing point of beliefs (sometimes called &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; is a general belief in social justice, and is sometimes associated with {{w|socialism}}. Modern left-wingers generally  mandate equality, and support policies like welfare and government-subsidized healthcare. This trends toward having a larger federal government. In the U.S., &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is a term often used to denote left-leaning tendencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; generally believe in conserving the social and economic status quo, which is often termed {{w|conservatism|conservative}}. This trends towards having  less regulation and thereby a smaller federal government. The goal is to keep the nation stable, and reducing the interference by the government with a person's wealth. This ostensibly means lower taxes, because the government does not provide as much.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Politicians typically align themselves into groups of similar beliefs and positions called &amp;quot;parties&amp;quot;. In the U.S., there have generally been two dominant parties (although there have been times where three or more parties have shared roughly equal influence and support. In today's politics (which is apparently known as the fifth era of political parties, or {{w|Fifth Party System}}, as noted on the outside edges of the comic)  of the two current primary U.S. political parties, the {{w|Democrats}} are the left-leaning party, and the {{w|Republicans}} are the right-leaning party. The dominant parties are generally considered  &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; in their left- or right-wing leanings, as either party appears to requires the support of a majority (or a few percent under) of voters to win In actuality a process called gerrymandering where election boundaries are redrawn to allow a political advantage to the party currently in power. An example being the republicans REDMAP 2012 report ([http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/21/16630863-virginia-republicans-move-for-permanent-majorit]y)  Smaller parties often run candidates with more extreme views, but such candidates rarely win, due to a more limited number of possible supporters ensuring that even a relatively large minority would have zero chance of representation. (see {{w|Duverger's law}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The comic===&lt;br /&gt;
The comic effectively consists of three separate charts: The left- and right-hand charts are the main charts; they represent the Senate and House respectively, and purport to show the left- and right-wing leanings of each legislature through U.S. history. There is a legend on the right that sets out fairly clearly how the charts work, but basically Randall has split each wing into three levels including the very moderate or &amp;quot;Center&amp;quot; right or left, and the more extreme or &amp;quot;Far&amp;quot; right or left, as well as the average left and right, without prefix. A dotted yellow line represented the balance of power in each legislature, and white lines represent the leanings of certain notable people including presidents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some presidents are not indicated, because they were never senators or congressmen (most of these were state Governors, such as {{w|Bill Clinton|Clinton}}, {{w|George W. Bush|Bush}} and 2012 candidate {{w|Mitt Romney}}). As may be noted from the chart, {{w|Barack Obama}} is considered &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; while {{w|Paul Ryan}} is considered &amp;quot;far right&amp;quot;. It's also notable that the &amp;quot;center right&amp;quot; ideology appears to be completely eradicated from the House and is waning in the Senate [http://xkcd.com/859/  (although a similar trend is shown around 1900 with the centrists making a comeback thereafter.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On either side of these charts, there are descriptions or explanations for expansions and contractions of each ideological group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The center chart appears to primarily act as a timeline. Each president is listed with their leanings indicated by a left or right arrow. Wars are shaded in grey. Other notable events are also indicated. On either side of the center chart (although somewhat mixed in with the aforementioned Senate/House explanations), there are also references to the primary parties of each era showing how they evolved (left-leaning parties on the left, and right-leaning parties on the right).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, there's a little extra commentary on the right side, below the legend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:A history of&lt;br /&gt;
:'''The United States Congress'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Partisan and ideological makeup&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic is divided into three massive sections, SENATE, PRESIDENCIES, and HOUSE. Timelines run backwards down the page between each section. In the HOUSE and SENATE sections, shifting, curving red and blue areas of different brightness illustrate the shifting balance of power between &amp;quot;Members of Left-Leaning Parties&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Members of Right-Leaning Parties&amp;quot;. Under PRESIDENCIES, different administrations are labeled and wars are shaded in gray. There are notes throughout all sections.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[There are additional notes on the right.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LEGEND&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square containing ribbons of color merging upwards with larger areas]'': Branches join in when new members enter Congress and cause an ideological bloc to grow. (Note: If the new member is elected as another retires from the same ideological bloc, no change is shown.)&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square containing ribbons of color splitting off from larger areas]'': Branches split off when members leave Congress, causing their ideological bloc to shrink. (Note: If the new member is elected as another retires from the same ideological bloc, no change is shown.)&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square showing yellow dotted line crossing from red to blue area]'': The yellow line marks the midpoint, which indicates which side has control of the chamber.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square in which curve briefly separates from blue area]'': If a bloc loses members in one election and gains them in the next, the exiting stream may rejoin. This does not necessarily mean the same people returned.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square showing white dashed line labeled Lyndon Johnson on top of ribbon merging with main area]'': Future (and past) US Presidents who served in Congress are shown with white dashed lines. Other noteworthy members are shown with thin solid lines.&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Square in which tinted area marked &amp;quot;Whig&amp;quot; sits over mix of red and blue areas]'': Tinted white outlines mark the approximate membership of some of the smaller political parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:HOW IDEOLOGY IS CALCULATED&lt;br /&gt;
::Each member of Congress is assigned to an ideological category using DW-NOMINATE, a statistical system created by political scientists Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. This system rates each member of Congress's ideological position position [sic] based on their votes.&lt;br /&gt;
::DW-NOMINATE is purely mathematical and involves no judgement on the content of bills. Instead, members of Congress are placed on a spectrum based on how consistently they vote together.&lt;br /&gt;
::While people argue that ideology is many-dimensional, Poole and Rosenthal found that nearly all Congressional voting behavior - especially in the modern era - can be accurately predicted by using just one ideological variable.&lt;br /&gt;
::This variable turns out to roughly correspond to position on the classic economic liberal/conservative spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
::Because members of Congress have served in overlapping terms with past members in a chain back to the first Congress, the system allows comparison of ideology across time - even accounting for individual members' ideological drift. (Note: Scores are comparable across time but not between chambers.)&lt;br /&gt;
::For more detail, see Poole and Rosenthal's website, voteview.com.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Large drawings]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1123:_The_Universal_Label&amp;diff=25966</id>
		<title>Talk:1123: The Universal Label</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1123:_The_Universal_Label&amp;diff=25966"/>
				<updated>2013-01-22T22:22:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think Randall may be going for another pun with the title text, as &amp;quot;H&amp;quot; is the chemical symbol for hydrogen.--[[User:Dangerkeith3000|Dangerkeith3000]] ([[User talk:Dangerkeith3000|talk]]) 15:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect that without Helium and a little Lithium we wouldn't even be here discussing this.  These were both formed independently of Hydrogen shortly after the BB and without them the first stars would have been huge and short-lived...[[Special:Contributions/62.255.252.76|62.255.252.76]] 14:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ... in other words, with the addition of time... -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 13:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
But you can make matter using energy, therefore, you only need energy and time! Ray&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The label's missing energy. Just saying. [[User:Davidy22|Davidy22]] ([[User talk:Davidy22|talk]]) 04:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But isn't it somehow contained in the hydrogen? I don't know squat about quantum physics, so I'm probably wrong. [[Special:Contributions/108.233.253.211|108.233.253.211]] 04:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, the amount of energy in any grocery or non-grocery (even in explosives) is significally lower that the amount of energy in hydrogen used for their creation. Sure, you need energy to grow crops, but where does that energy come from? Hydrogen fusion in Sun - which is first step of creating the carbon the crop is from (not the same crop, of course). -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
So when [http://xkcd.com/282/ Mussolini made the trains run on thyme] he was really making them run on hydrogen '''and''' time?--[[User:Pmakholm|Pmakholm]] ([[User talk:Pmakholm|talk]]) 08:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is the smallest xkcd comic ever. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/85.159.196.21|85.159.196.21]] 09:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's also the first in a long time to make me laugh out loud!  Steve B.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect Randall was influenced by this quote: &amp;quot;Given enough time, hydrogen starts to wonder where it came from, and where it is going&amp;quot;, attributed to Edward R. Harrison. --[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure you can make antimatter with just regular hydrogen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/85.159.196.21|85.159.196.21]] 11:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why would food contain antimatter? --[[User:Kronf|Kronf]] ([[User talk:Kronf|talk]]) 12:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I think I've spotted my first Randall mistake. Using this ingredient list, The amount of time must exceed the amount of hydrogen (unless the product is hydrogen) thus Time should be listed first on the label. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;— Comment by [[User:14:09, 19 October 2012|14:09, 19 October 2012]] ([[User talk:14:09, 19 October 2012|talk]]) Anthingy &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Which units are you using?  How do you relate a cup full of Time and a day full of Hydrogen? [[Special:Contributions/67.51.59.66|67.51.59.66]] 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In Norway (and I guess most other countries where producers must list them) ingredients are sorted by weight, and I guess time doesn't weigh anything but in a metaphorical sense. --[[User:Buggz|Buggz]] ([[User talk:Buggz|talk]]) 08:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if time weighs nothing, isn't Hydrogen lighter than air at 1 atmosphere? That would give it a negative weight, so it should be listed last.[[Special:Contributions/74.90.90.111|74.90.90.111]] 04:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a significant difference between having negative weight and being positively buoyant in Earth atmosphere. Weight is simply the acceleration caused by gravity (9.8 m/s^2, here on Earth) multiplied by mass (.0899 g for each litre of hydrogen). Hydrogen has mass (and therefore weight); time doesn't. --[[User:LiteralPhilosopher|LiteralPhilosopher]] [[Special:Contributions/166.142.157.51|166.142.157.51]] 11:45, 26 November 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Time has a whole lot of wait. {{unsigned|67.139.67.178}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, that may be a mistake, but the FDA website mentions &amp;quot;predominance by weight.&amp;quot; I'm not sure how time would compare to hydrogen in that respect. Also I translated thyme = H+time = tHime. --[[Special:Contributions/207.170.250.186|207.170.250.186]] 14:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, it's not Randall's first mistake, he made some in the last comic. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Stencil&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[User talk:???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Implying the above commentor is Randall. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96|76.122.5.96]] 15:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time is not a proper ingredient like hydrogen. It is permitted in Randall's ingredient list by cartoon license.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Because all matter was originally created through stellar nuclear fusion from hydrogen over time&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear fusion only explains the creation of all elements up to iron. Heavier elements are created by other processes:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesis]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-process]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-process]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-process]&lt;br /&gt;
:The fusion of heavier elements is still fusion, even if it takes a supernova to make it happen.  Nothing in the cartoon suggests that only the fusion reactions found in stable stars apply, and even more complicated processes (fusion+fission, whatever) involves matter that ultimately has a hydrogen pedigree.  (I am, however, intrigued by the comment about helium and lithium in the early universe.  I have some of those around here somewhere.) [[Special:Contributions/208.54.40.210|208.54.40.210]] 21:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the risk of nitpicking: The present composition of the universe is about 75% dark energy, 20% dark matter, and 5% baryons, i. e., hydrogen, helium, and everything else. In the early universe, the dark energy was less important. And in the very early universe, before the formation of elements or even subnuclear particles, there were just quantum fluctuations of some primordial field. Space, time, and energy are related by gravity. So maybe, if quantum gravity is ever figured out, it will turn out all you need is a fluctuation in time. But all this spoils the herbal pun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/128.171.86.198|128.171.86.198]] 21:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Universe / Universal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also think universal is the adjective for universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the label has universal use and specifies universal origin.&lt;br /&gt;
Another pun?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/178.26.107.37|178.26.107.37]] 23:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This label has now been applied to every poster of the cosmos in my current school. This applies to both the poster as an item and the subject matter of the image. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 22:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1123:_The_Universal_Label&amp;diff=25965</id>
		<title>Talk:1123: The Universal Label</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1123:_The_Universal_Label&amp;diff=25965"/>
				<updated>2013-01-22T22:22:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think Randall may be going for another pun with the title text, as &amp;quot;H&amp;quot; is the chemical symbol for hydrogen.--[[User:Dangerkeith3000|Dangerkeith3000]] ([[User talk:Dangerkeith3000|talk]]) 15:42, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect that without Helium and a little Lithium we wouldn't even be here discussing this.  These were both formed independently of Hydrogen shortly after the BB and without them the first stars would have been huge and short-lived...[[Special:Contributions/62.255.252.76|62.255.252.76]] 14:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ... in other words, with the addition of time... -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 13:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
But you can make matter using energy, therefore, you only need energy and time! Ray&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The label's missing energy. Just saying. [[User:Davidy22|Davidy22]] ([[User talk:Davidy22|talk]]) 04:34, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But isn't it somehow contained in the hydrogen? I don't know squat about quantum physics, so I'm probably wrong. [[Special:Contributions/108.233.253.211|108.233.253.211]] 04:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, the amount of energy in any grocery or non-grocery (even in explosives) is significally lower that the amount of energy in hydrogen used for their creation. Sure, you need energy to grow crops, but where does that energy come from? Hydrogen fusion in Sun - which is first step of creating the carbon the crop is from (not the same crop, of course). -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
So when [http://xkcd.com/282/ Mussolini made the trains run on thyme] he was really making them run on hydrogen '''and''' time?--[[User:Pmakholm|Pmakholm]] ([[User talk:Pmakholm|talk]]) 08:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is the smallest xkcd comic ever. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/85.159.196.21|85.159.196.21]] 09:43, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's also the first in a long time to make me laugh out loud!  Steve B.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect Randall was influenced by this quote: &amp;quot;Given enough time, hydrogen starts to wonder where it came from, and where it is going&amp;quot;, attributed to Edward R. Harrison. --[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure you can make antimatter with just regular hydrogen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/85.159.196.21|85.159.196.21]] 11:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why would food contain antimatter? --[[User:Kronf|Kronf]] ([[User talk:Kronf|talk]]) 12:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I think I've spotted my first Randall mistake. Using this ingredient list, The amount of time must exceed the amount of hydrogen (unless the product is hydrogen) thus Time should be listed first on the label. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;— Comment by [[User:14:09, 19 October 2012|14:09, 19 October 2012]] ([[User talk:14:09, 19 October 2012|talk]]) Anthingy &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Which units are you using?  How do you relate a cup full of Time and a day full of Hydrogen? [[Special:Contributions/67.51.59.66|67.51.59.66]] 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In Norway (and I guess most other countries where producers must list them) ingredients are sorted by weight, and I guess time doesn't weigh anything but in a metaphorical sense. --[[User:Buggz|Buggz]] ([[User talk:Buggz|talk]]) 08:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if time weighs nothing, isn't Hydrogen lighter than air at 1 atmosphere? That would give it a negative weight, so it should be listed last.[[Special:Contributions/74.90.90.111|74.90.90.111]] 04:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a significant difference between having negative weight and being positively buoyant in Earth atmosphere. Weight is simply the acceleration caused by gravity (9.8 m/s^2, here on Earth) multiplied by mass (.0899 g for each litre of hydrogen). Hydrogen has mass (and therefore weight); time doesn't. --[[User:LiteralPhilosopher|LiteralPhilosopher]] [[Special:Contributions/166.142.157.51|166.142.157.51]] 11:45, 26 November 2012 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Time has a whole lot of wait. {{unsigned|67.139.67.178}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, that may be a mistake, but the FDA website mentions &amp;quot;predominance by weight.&amp;quot; I'm not sure how time would compare to hydrogen in that respect. Also I translated thyme = H+time = tHime. --[[Special:Contributions/207.170.250.186|207.170.250.186]] 14:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, it's not Randall's first mistake, he made some in the last comic. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Stencil&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[User talk:???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/???|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;gt;?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Implying the above commentor is Randall. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96|76.122.5.96]] 15:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time is not a proper ingredient like hydrogen. It is permitted in Randall's ingredient list by cartoon license.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Because all matter was originally created through stellar nuclear fusion from hydrogen over time&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear fusion only explains the creation of all elements up to iron. Heavier elements are created by other processes:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesis]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-process]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-process]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-process]&lt;br /&gt;
:The fusion of heavier elements is still fusion, even if it takes a supernova to make it happen.  Nothing in the cartoon suggests that only the fusion reactions found in stable stars apply, and even more complicated processes (fusion+fission, whatever) involves matter that ultimately has a hydrogen pedigree.  (I am, however, intrigued by the comment about helium and lithium in the early universe.  I have some of those around here somewhere.) [[Special:Contributions/208.54.40.210|208.54.40.210]] 21:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the risk of nitpicking: The present composition of the universe is about 75% dark energy, 20% dark matter, and 5% baryons, i. e., hydrogen, helium, and everything else. In the early universe, the dark energy was less important. And in the very early universe, before the formation of elements or even subnuclear particles, there were just quantum fluctuations of some primordial field. Space, time, and energy are related by gravity. So maybe, if quantum gravity is ever figured out, it will turn out all you need is a fluctuation in time. But all this spoils the herbal pun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/128.171.86.198|128.171.86.198]] 21:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Universe / Universal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also think universal is the adjective for universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the label has universal use and specifies universal origin.&lt;br /&gt;
Another pun?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/178.26.107.37|178.26.107.37]] 23:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This label has now been applied to every poster of the cosmos in my current school. This applies to both the poster as an item and the subject matter of the image. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 22:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1121:_Identity&amp;diff=25964</id>
		<title>Talk:1121: Identity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1121:_Identity&amp;diff=25964"/>
				<updated>2013-01-22T22:13:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;He could also be bothered by her willingness to give away the password so easily.  Anyone who has spent a sufficient amount of time with the character would have an idea of the things he's interested in.  The image text supports it a little by saying how anyone he knows would be aware that he acts like that. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96|76.122.5.96]] 08:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They could also be using a version of Google Wave or some such IM... It was possible to view realtime what the others were typing on the window. Then Megan would be able to interrupt Cueball easily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notably, although the characters appear to be communicating by way of text (whether SMS, or some instant messaging protocol), Megan should not be able to interrupt Cueball. Text-based messages do not typically stream in realtime as they are typed. She wouldn't be able to read his message until he completed it and sent it. {{unsigned|TheHYPO}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unless they are using something like the unix talk command, which does stream characters as they are typed. This might make sense since they are conversing about a server password, but talk might also perform proper authentication, although it could likely be spoofed as most early unix programs were not very secure. The characters are not streamed in real time, by the way, because there is no deadline for transmission of the characters. Sending something &amp;quot;as soon as possible&amp;quot; is pretty much the opposite of &amp;quot;real-time&amp;quot; and I think this wiki should make great efforts to be extra geeky about the use of the phrase &amp;quot;real-time&amp;quot; treating it like &amp;quot;real-time operating system&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;I use the web so I think the word 'real-time' means that time itself is not fake.&amp;quot; Has Randall written a comic about the misuse of the phrase &amp;quot;real-time&amp;quot;? He should. {{unsigned|Jsbqvb}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm going to quibble over your quibbling over semantics for a moment. &amp;quot;Real-time communication&amp;quot; is not simply saying something immediately after another person. Imagine you and I are sitting in plush armchairs in my front parlour, discussing philosophy. You ask me &amp;quot;What is real-time communication?&amp;quot; I look up to the ceiling, as I formulate my response. According to your definition, this conversation has now left real-time, and become a no-deadline-for-transmission delayed communication, because I've failed to respond immediately. Another example, we're sitting in a park outside at a marble chess table. You move your rook. I study the game board before making my own move. Are you going to argue that this is no longer a real-time game because of my delay?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A third example. I sit down in my writing room and write a lengthy letter addressed to you and put it into the mail. My postman picks up the mail later that day. It gets sorted and put onto a truck to your house. The truck drives across state lines to the distribution center near your house. The letter gets put in your postman's sack, and that day on his rounds he delivers it to your postbox. You read it and write your response. Your postman picks it up the next day, it's trucked back to my state and delivered to me 2 days after you wrote it. Is this real-time communication? I'll answer that one for you. No it isn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What makes communication real-time, and what doesn't? I don't have a hard-and-fast definition for you. I consider, talking to a person whether face-to-face or over the phone real-time. I consider sending mail and email delayed communication. Instant Messages are real-time if I get an answer within five minutes of when I sent them, same with text messages. So is five minutes a good differentiating line? Here's another example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We're in grade school, and we're all sitting in a circle playing {{w|Telephone (game)|Telephone}}. I whisper the message to my neighbor, who whispers it on until it reaches you, at the other end of the circle. The whole game takes perhaps a minute. Is this real-time communication? No, because I'm passing the message to middle-men. But that's how messages travel the Internet, bouncing through routers until they reach you. So, it can't be that there are no middle-men involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In conclusion. I think your argument that &amp;quot;somewhat delayed delivery of a response&amp;quot; would be a better phrase instead of &amp;quot;real-time&amp;quot; is fallacious, and pointless. That we need to be cautious of the usage of &amp;quot;real-time communication&amp;quot; is not one of the things I think we need to be worried about. I do think we need to be careful of how we rear the upcoming generations, pay attention to the difference between &amp;quot;loose&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;lose&amp;quot;, how to spell &amp;quot;onomatopoeia&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;definitely&amp;quot; correctly, as well as using &amp;quot;literally&amp;quot; accurately, &amp;quot;who&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;whom&amp;quot;, when to and more importantly when not to dangle prepositions, learning when to use which dashes, avoiding ''ad hominem'' arguments, trying to be a little less pedantic with others, and taking some time to slow down and smell the flowers and enjoy the scenery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 19:11, 16 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with the action plan given in your final paragraph. However, while I don't disagree with your point, your example about the chess game might be a little confusing for some because in games there is a rather well established usage of &amp;quot;real time&amp;quot; games as being in direct opposition to &amp;quot;turn-based&amp;quot; games. Here &amp;quot;real time&amp;quot; usually means that the action all happens continuously and simultaneously, whereas &amp;quot;turn-based&amp;quot; means that everything proceeds by turns (i.e. I make a move, then you do, then me again, etc.), such as in chess. [[User:Erenan|Erenan]] ([[User talk:Erenan|talk]]) 15:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Moved here from the explanation. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 16:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you say something, the sound of your voice is spreading by speed of sound, which is relatively slow. What communication can actually be called real-time by the &amp;quot;no delay&amp;quot; definition? Telepathy? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 08:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's possible that by utilizing quantum entanglement we may be able to achieve communication of information without any delay. I may be wrong about this. Anyone with more knowledge about it care to correct me? [[User:Erenan|Erenan]] ([[User talk:Erenan|talk]]) 20:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My understanding would be that instantaneous communication is impossible. Communication implies a transfer of information of some kind (regardless of how useful it is). Since in order to receive information into the human mind you atteh very least must wait the tiny amount of time for your nerves to transmit their signals from the sensory nerves to the brain. Add to that the assumption of travel via light waves which take time and or sound waves which take longer to arrive at the sensory organ. Even if a device could use a technology to have information come out as soon as it goes in somewhere else, you will have to wait again for the nerves if you surgically implant the the device. Why go through all that trouble and not go the next logical step. If time travel is incorporated you could include the lag so that the trip is finished at the same time it arrived. Of course you could also send yourself a message from the future to not waste Jorge time and to get a life. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 22:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's possible that he was sending each sentence separately, and she's responding to one of the ones he already completed. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96|76.122.5.96]] 18:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;NO!&amp;quot; may not be for security but the disappointment of missed opportunity to design a 'cool' identity proof protocol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While it's true he hasn't yet properly proved his identity, the &amp;quot;NO!&amp;quot; is DEFINITELY the disappointment of missed opportunity to design a 'cool' identity proof protocol. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 08:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They could be using skype (mobile and on PC with mic) to communicate, not necessarily text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Seriously, why would any of you NOT think that they were using a speakerphone to communicate? (be it through the phone, skype or gtalk or whatever service)? You even got the little &amp;quot;sound wave&amp;quot; lines coming from the devices as the character communicates. [[Special:Contributions/206.72.206.101|206.72.206.101]] 13:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Cueball is holding his phone with two hands. He's clearly texting. The &amp;quot;sound wave&amp;quot; lines are clearly meant to indicate that it's what the character is typing/texting. Also, the transcript indicates that Megan's text in the third frame is a text message (the parenthetical is here only because it's the only place where text is present from a character not visible in the image). [[User:Erenan|Erenan]] ([[User talk:Erenan|talk]]) 00:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: That's the dumbest thing I've ever read. And I've read a LOT. Who needs two hands to text, and why can't someone hold a phone with both hands when on speaker? Furthermore, the transcript has NO BEARING AT ALL on discussions of the comic, because it's subjective.  [[Special:Contributions/174.142.37.82|174.142.37.82]] 04:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Never mind, Erenan, I just saw your user-page and your pages. You've got enough issues. You're right, of course, there's no conceivable way Cueball could be doing anything but texting. It's &amp;quot;clear&amp;quot;, and the sound wave lines &amp;quot;clearly&amp;quot; indicate that as well. I stand corrected. Enjoy life. You're &amp;quot;clearly&amp;quot; very smart and always right. [[Special:Contributions/174.142.37.82|174.142.37.82]] 04:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::At no point is there a need to personally attack another commenter on this site like that. Also, '''do not''' edit other people's posts on a talk page, that is rude in the extreme. Come back in a week, maybe you can keep a civil tongue in your head. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  05:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Wiki etiquette states that you do not touch other people's comments - replacing his name with &amp;quot;dumbo&amp;quot; is childish. As for the transcript, it came from the div with id &amp;quot;transcript&amp;quot; in the source on the XKCD website. I believe Randall knows his own comics well enough [[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;(talk)&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::{{w|Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Editing comments|Link}} as source for Davidy's statement. Go forth and educate thineself. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  05:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reference to dinosaur fascination might be a last ditch attempt to try and fool people who MIT try and impersonate Randall. My understanding which may be flawed is that Randal has a fear around raptors, and close friends might hear praise for these and get suspicious if the leave out the fear part. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 22:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1111:_Premiere&amp;diff=25864</id>
		<title>Talk:1111: Premiere</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1111:_Premiere&amp;diff=25864"/>
				<updated>2013-01-21T07:40:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Existential? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Maybe I'm just splitting hairs, but I'm not sure that's Megan. Her hair looks a little shorter. --[[User:Joehammer79|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79|talk]]) 20:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The ''coif de mode'' is for the camera; she's gussied up for the event! -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the title text &amp;quot;distraction&amp;quot; is not about a literal buzz, but about the movie in question: the mindless Hollywood &amp;quot;entertainment&amp;quot; is supposed to distract us from our problems of total, eventual annihilation at the hands of a mindless, uncaring universe. --BigMal27 / [[Special:Contributions/192.136.15.177|192.136.15.177]] 12:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Existential? ===&lt;br /&gt;
I think the comic is existential, and perhaps even mocking fatalism. Everything Megan says is technically true, but also immediately irrelevant and the terms used, and even bringing it up is over-the-top bleak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then again. It might make fun of news, since being over the top about things that often doesn't matter is a big part of what they do. So perhaps what news would be like if the reporters where more knowledgeable but still acted as stupid? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take your pick. I am not adding it to the explanation yet, since it is only two of several interpretation, but existentialism has been a feature of many other xkcd strips. [[User:Carewolf|Carewolf]] ([[User talk:Carewolf|talk]]) 14:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I would consider the limited livespan of Sun to be more important that the movie. Less pressing, of course. The movie stars will be dead sooner ... unless you consider them live as long as their films are showing, in which case they may last as long as our civilisation. --[[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 07:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt any media produced today will survive as long as our star. Shakes spears works or cave paintings have only been around for a micro sliver of our suns life cycle. Their mediums would not last that long since even our mountains won't last that long.  [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 07:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1108:_Cautionary_Ghost&amp;diff=25860</id>
		<title>Talk:1108: Cautionary Ghost</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1108:_Cautionary_Ghost&amp;diff=25860"/>
				<updated>2013-01-21T07:23:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The comic seems to suggest that it is obviously a waste of effort if the world remains the same regardless of the argument. But maybe the argues goal is not to correct grammar as much as it is to be entertained by the deficiencies in others and the arguments that may arise. Feeling superior through trolling regular conversations. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 07:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Literally ==&lt;br /&gt;
Could it have been spurred by [http://www.explosm.net/comics/2923/ this comic]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It shares quibbles over the word literally, but the driving idea behind the jokes are different. [[User:Davidy22|Davidy22]] ([[User talk:Davidy22|talk]]) 06:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Exasperation over the misuse/overuse of &amp;quot;literally&amp;quot; is quite widespread, especially among the target audience of xkcd. I doubt the choice was inspired by a particular source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is a reference to this prior [http://xkcd.com/725/ xkcd comic] which is also dealing with the difference between literally and figuratively and somebody eager to tell people the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/194.167.19.2|194.167.19.2]] 08:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Josch&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think there is a huge difference between devoting years of time &amp;amp; energy waiting to 'gotcha' someone and encouraging people to use a word correctly.  Because so many people use the word &amp;quot;literally&amp;quot; for emphasis even when their usage is figurative, how can I tell someone that my usage of something is in fact literal? [[User:JaniceOly|JaniceOly]] ([[User talk:JaniceOly|talk]]) 03:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having the ''Literally'' as the word to argue about seems to be fitting this comic quite well, since the world is literally the same in both scenarios. Or, the other way around, arguing about ''literally'' literally doesn't matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Idyllic ==&lt;br /&gt;
What's so idyllic on that scene? That people are still alive and someone is still flying? (Note that it may be airforce one) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Dickens ==&lt;br /&gt;
''The usage of a ghost from the past or future to deliver a message in fiction was begun in Charles Dicken's A Christmas Carol'' - I really don't think that's true. --[[User:Kronf|Kronf]] ([[User talk:Kronf|talk]]) 12:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Subjunctive ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say, not using the subjunctive case correctly really grinds my gears, 'as it were'. --[[Special:Contributions/216.110.25.2|216.110.25.2]] 13:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)dangerkeith3000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed the typo someone made on the title text ghost: Ghost of &amp;lt;del&amp;gt;Subjective&amp;lt;/del&amp;gt; Subjunctive Past. I also typed up some information on the subjunctive mood and the subjunctive past construction. Hopefully this helps clear up the title text. [[User:Haruspex|Haruspex]] ([[User talk:Haruspex|talk]]) 13:54, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure it's correct to describe the fight in favor of ''if it were'' as &amp;quot;equally trivial&amp;quot;. Isn't the entire point of the title text that that fight '''is''' worth continuing? --[[User:Cristo|Cristo]] ([[User talk:Cristo|talk]]) 15:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Haruspex: Thanks for clearing up that issue of subjective/subjunctive -- I was just about to go in and fix it myself. --[[User:Pdaoust|Pdaoust]] ([[User talk:Pdaoust|talk]]) 16:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subjunctive is a MOOD, not a CASE or a TENSE.  And ask Shakespeare about using ghosts to deliver messages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Third panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hmm shouldn't the third panel read &amp;quot;... if you '''gave''' up the fight ... &amp;quot;? --[[Special:Contributions/220.255.1.119|220.255.1.119]] 07:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope. ''This &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;is&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the future.'' --[[User:Kronf|Kronf]] ([[User talk:Kronf|talk]]) 11:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree, &amp;quot;give&amp;quot; is correct here. The guy has not yet given up the fight; &amp;quot;give&amp;quot; is in {{w|imperative mood}}. --[[User:Smartin|Smartin]] ([[User talk:Smartin|talk]]) 04:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1100:_Vows&amp;diff=25747</id>
		<title>1100: Vows</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1100:_Vows&amp;diff=25747"/>
				<updated>2013-01-19T07:59:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1100&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 27, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Vows&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = vows.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = So, um. Do you want to get a drink after the game?&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic deals with misdirection plays in {{w|American Football}}, which are feints, moves intended to misdirect or fool the opponents about what is really happening. A standard misdirection play involves the offence misdirecting the defence into thinking that the play being executed is actually a different play such as that a passing play is a running play, that a ball being run left is actually being run right, or that a field goal or punt end up being attempts to get a first down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally, especially at the high school level, extreme misdirection plays are attempted where teams try to misdirect the opposing team into thinking that a play is not even being run. Good examples of that can be found on YouTube, such as this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkA3nxuMJoM &amp;quot;wrong ball&amp;quot; trick], or that [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UIdI8khMkw &amp;quot;five more yards&amp;quot; trick]. These are considered to be dirty tricks and usually only work in little league football.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, a couple is about to get married, but the bride defects at the last minute, answering &amp;quot;no&amp;quot; to the ritual and mostly ceremonial question whether she agrees to it. It turns out that [[Cueball]], the groom, has been tricked into thinking that he is at his own wedding rather than playing in a high school football game, in what must have been an extremely elaborated misdirection play designed to make him believe a succession of events leading him to wed &amp;quot;Amy&amp;quot;... But &amp;quot;Amy&amp;quot; turns out to be a player for the opposing team and runs the ball in for a touchdown. That clearly constitutes the ''greatest high school football misdirection play of all time''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] really takes here the deception in a misdirection play to the next level; and actually to an improbable one, in that it is unlikely that a relationship could develop to the point of marriage within the timeframe of a football game, with Cueball not noticing that Amy was in fact a football player, or that he was standing on the football field. See also {{w|The Matrix}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is apparently what Cueball wants to say to &amp;quot;Amy&amp;quot;, which could mean that he did not realize the complete trick, and amazed by &amp;quot;Amy&amp;quot; still wants to date &amp;quot;her&amp;quot;. Or it could more simply be Cueball suggesting a drink to his opponent; or the opponent to Cueball. The title text could also imply that the deception efforts actually resulted in real feelings and thus while not ready to wed or give up the game, Amy could be inquiring if after all that he'd be willing to go for drinks. This could thus be a date or a no hard feelings jesture. The shy tone implies a dating type interest from whichever speaker it happens to be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wedding]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1086:_Eyelash_Wish_Log&amp;diff=25663</id>
		<title>1086: Eyelash Wish Log</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1086:_Eyelash_Wish_Log&amp;diff=25663"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T23:08:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1086&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 25, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Eyelash Wish Log&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = eyelash_wish_log.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Ooh, another one. Uh ... the ability to alter any coefficients of friction at will during sporting events.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is based on the situation that when someone's eyelash falls out, that person can make a wish on it. This comic appears to be a page from the fictitious Wish Bureau in charge of granting said wishes. And of course the Wisher is [[Black Hat]] and he has quite a few wishes, most of them based on the previous wish. A common trope in fiction is that wishing for more wishes is prohibited and for many of his wishes [[Black Hat]] attempts to circumvent that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
February 12's wish seems to be a reference to the unlimited {{w|breadsticks}} offered at {{w|Olive Garden}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
February 27's wish relates to a common practice especially in tweets or other short length mediums where full length specific HTML addresses such as wwww.somewhere.com/articles/specificdate/the page.htm would not be feasible. So a more compressed but often less sensical string of seemingly random characters is used which links to a link of the full text address. This creates some problems for people who are security or privacy conscious and prefer to be informed before hand where they will be traveling on the Internet. It is analogous to a twisting set of watersides. Some water parks label where they end up and what style of ride it is (the doom tunnel vs the kiddy kicker). Imagine however your wanting a nice ride ending in shallow water. You could not wily predict the unlabelled ride as it twists out of sight if the label is gibberish. You might end up thinking your attempt to go down the Bay Watch slide might end you up in Pamella's porn pool, which could be well over your head. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 7's wish is a reference to {{w|Nate Silver}}, who is a former writer for {{w|Baseball Prospectus}} working on predicting baseball players' stats and now writes for {{w|Five Thirty Eight}} in which he predicts the outcome of elections based on polling data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And April 22's wish is a reference to the cartoon and video game, {{w|Pokemon}}. A pokéball can be thrown at a Pokémon (or in this case, an annoying pet) to capture it and seal it indefinitely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1084:_Server_Problem&amp;diff=25662</id>
		<title>1084: Server Problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1084:_Server_Problem&amp;diff=25662"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T22:43:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1084&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 20, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Server Problem&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = server_problem.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Protip: Annoy Ray Kurzweil by always referring to it as the 'Cybersingularity'.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] has messed up his Linux server (again, so he apparently does this a lot).  [[Megan]] comes over and enters the basic command 'ls' which is supposed to list the files in the current directory. Instead, the computer responds with a generic error message generated by a file named ls.jar in an obscure location.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even ignoring that the 'ls' command's executable file would not typically be named ls.jar (which suggests a Java-language program), the file's location appears to be nonsensical.  The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard#Directory_structure /usr/share path should indicate] &amp;quot;architecture-independent shared data&amp;quot;.  Adobe is the maker of such programs as Acrobat, Flash and Photoshop.  Android VM would be a virtual machine for the mobile Operating System created by Google called Android.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] is annoyed at the weird result.  [[Cueball]]'s answer seems as if he is less knowledgeable about the behaviour that is normally expected of the 'ls' command.  The crux of the comic is then that the solution to [[Cueball]]'s lack of knowledge and tendency to mess up his server would be to just give up and &amp;quot;wait for the singularity&amp;quot;.  It is implied that after this future technological advancement a server will be able to properly operate itself without [[Cueball]] repeatedly having to ask for [[Megan]]'s assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last frame has Queball recommending a course of action which mimics a common error message. Some variation of this ______ is busy, please try again later. Obviously he has seen this type of message frequently enough to try it as a general cure all similar to the advice to restart any malfunctioning program or device. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity singularity] is &amp;quot;the hypothetical future emergence of greater-than-human superintelligence through technological means. Since the capabilities of such intelligence would be difficult for an unaided human mind to comprehend, the occurrence of a technological singularity is seen as an intellectual event horizon, beyond which events cannot be predicted or understood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents of the singularity typically state that an &amp;quot;intelligence explosion&amp;quot;, where superintelligences design successive generations of increasingly powerful minds, might occur very quickly and might not stop until the agent's cognitive abilities greatly surpass that of any human.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the image text, Ray Kurzweil is an author and futurist who has talked and written much about the singularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Person 1, sitting at laptop: I, um, messed up my server again.&lt;br /&gt;
:Person 2: I'll take a look.  You have the ''weirdest'' tech problems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Person 2 uses the root prompt]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;~# ls&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[computer returns the following]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;/usr/share/Adobe/doc/example/android_vm/root/sbin/ls.jar:&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;Error: Device is not responding.&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:[Person 2 has an amazingly incredulous look on their face]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Person 2: What did you ''do''!?&lt;br /&gt;
:Person 1: Maybe the device is busy. Should I try it later?&lt;br /&gt;
:Person 2: You should shut down this system and wait for the Singularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linux]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1074:_Moon_Landing&amp;diff=25611</id>
		<title>1074: Moon Landing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1074:_Moon_Landing&amp;diff=25611"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T07:27:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Title text */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1074&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 27, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Moon Landing&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = moon_landing.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize =&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Ok, so Spirit and Opportunity are pretty awesome. And Kepler. And New Horizons, Cassini, Curiosity, TiME, and Project M. But c'mon, if the Earth were a basketball, in 40 years no human's been more than half an inch from the surface.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist and science communicator. He is currently the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space. You have probably seen him on many different TV shows from anything on the Discovery Channel to The Big Bang Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]]'s argument about NASA faking the moon landing gives a far more compelling argument than Tyson does. And of course [[Cueball]] responds with a pun on the word &amp;quot;burn&amp;quot;.  Burn can mean a particularly effective joke that insults another person.  Additionally, burn in space travel means when the space ship burns fuel for propulsion.  In this case, the &amp;quot;burn&amp;quot; was so effective it pushed the spaceship out of orbit (which usually takes a very large amount of burning - depending on the gravity of the planet or moon.) The usual interpretation for a deorbit is to reduce an orbit to interesect with an atmosphere, so it might not be that big a burn needed. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/deorbit . Leaving orbit outward is usually an orbit change or transfer. Higher orbit or switching the central body from say the earth to the sun or moon etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Title text ===&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Spirit and Opportunity are Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER) on an ongoing robotic space mission exploring the planet Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Kepler is a space observatory launched by NASA to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's New Horizons is a robotic spacecraft mission currently en route to the dwarf planet Pluto. It is expected to be the first spacecraft to flyby and study Pluto and its moons, Charon, Nix, Hydra and S/2011 P 1, with an estimated arrival date at the Pluto-Charon system of July 14, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Cassini–Huygens is a flagship-class NASA-ESA-ASI spacecraft sent to the Saturn system. It has studied the planet and its many natural satellites since arriving there in 2004, also observing Jupiter, the Heliosphere, and testing the theory of relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Curiosity is a Mars rover launched on November 26, 2011. Currently On the planet as planned, it was scheduled to land in Gale Crater at about 05:31 UTC on August 6, 2012. The rover's objectives include searching for past or present life, studying the Martian climate, studying Martian geology, and collecting data for a future manned mission to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's TiME or Titan Mare Explorer is a proposed spacecraft lander that, if launched, would probe Titan, the largest moon of the planet Saturn, and would perform the first exploration of an extraterrestrial sea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Project M was a proposed NASA project headed by Stephen J. Altemus, to send a Robonaut to the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And that is terrible to hear in the image text that we haven't been more than half an inch from the surface of the Earth if it were the size of a basketball. Personally, I'm putting most of my hope in Space X. With most of the NASA layoffs, a lot of the people went over to Space X.  (A private company dedicated to space travel founded by former eBay founder Elon Musk.) I think they (or another private company) are the only hope of getting back into space and permanently this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is sitting at a table with a laptop open. His hands are on the keys.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Hah-- Neil DeGrasse Tyson has a great reply to people who doubt astronauts went to the moon.&lt;br /&gt;
:Voice off-screen: Oh?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: &amp;quot;Atop 3,000 tons of rocket fuel, where ''else'' do you think they were headed?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The voice off screen turns out to be Megan. She is depicted, and now Cueball is off-screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Cute. But it overlooks an even simpler argument.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Which is?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both Megan and Cueball are now visible. Cueball has turned his chair around to face her.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: If NASA were willing to fake great accomplishments, they'd have a second one by now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Ouch.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ...Too mean?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: That burn was so harsh I think you deorbited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1074:_Moon_Landing&amp;diff=25610</id>
		<title>1074: Moon Landing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1074:_Moon_Landing&amp;diff=25610"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T07:24:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1074&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 27, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Moon Landing&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = moon_landing.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize =&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Ok, so Spirit and Opportunity are pretty awesome. And Kepler. And New Horizons, Cassini, Curiosity, TiME, and Project M. But c'mon, if the Earth were a basketball, in 40 years no human's been more than half an inch from the surface.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist and science communicator. He is currently the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space. You have probably seen him on many different TV shows from anything on the Discovery Channel to The Big Bang Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]]'s argument about NASA faking the moon landing gives a far more compelling argument than Tyson does. And of course [[Cueball]] responds with a pun on the word &amp;quot;burn&amp;quot;.  Burn can mean a particularly effective joke that insults another person.  Additionally, burn in space travel means when the space ship burns fuel for propulsion.  In this case, the &amp;quot;burn&amp;quot; was so effective it pushed the spaceship out of orbit (which usually takes a very large amount of burning - depending on the gravity of the planet or moon.) The usual interpretation for a deorbit is to reduce an orbit to interesect with an atmosphere, so it might not be that big a burn needed. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/deorbit . Leaving orbit outward is usually an orbit change or transfer. Higher orbit or switching the central body from say the earth to the sun or moon etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Title text ===&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Spirit and Opportunity are Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER) on an ongoing robotic space mission exploring the planet Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Kepler is a space observatory launched by NASA to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's New Horizons is a robotic spacecraft mission currently en route to the dwarf planet Pluto. It is expected to be the first spacecraft to flyby and study Pluto and its moons, Charon, Nix, Hydra and S/2011 P 1, with an estimated arrival date at the Pluto-Charon system of July 14, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Cassini–Huygens is a flagship-class NASA-ESA-ASI spacecraft sent to the Saturn system. It has studied the planet and its many natural satellites since arriving there in 2004, also observing Jupiter, the Heliosphere, and testing the theory of relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's Curiosity is a Mars rover launched on November 26, 2011. Currently en route to the planet, it was scheduled to land in Gale Crater at about 05:31 UTC on August 6, 2012. The rover's objectives include searching for past or present life, studying the Martian climate, studying Martian geology, and collecting data for a future manned mission to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NASA's TiME or Titan Mare Explorer is a proposed spacecraft lander that, if launched, would probe Titan, the largest moon of the planet Saturn, and would perform the first exploration of an extraterrestrial sea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Project M was a proposed NASA project headed by Stephen J. Altemus, to send a Robonaut to the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And that is terrible to hear in the image text that we haven't been more than half an inch from the surface of the Earth if it were the size of a basketball. Personally, I'm putting most of my hope in Space X. With most of the NASA layoffs, a lot of the people went over to Space X.  (A private company dedicated to space travel founded by former eBay founder Elon Musk.) I think they (or another private company) are the only hope of getting back into space and permanently this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is sitting at a table with a laptop open. His hands are on the keys.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Hah-- Neil DeGrasse Tyson has a great reply to people who doubt astronauts went to the moon.&lt;br /&gt;
:Voice off-screen: Oh?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: &amp;quot;Atop 3,000 tons of rocket fuel, where ''else'' do you think they were headed?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The voice off screen turns out to be Megan. She is depicted, and now Cueball is off-screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Cute. But it overlooks an even simpler argument.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Which is?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Both Megan and Cueball are now visible. Cueball has turned his chair around to face her.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: If NASA were willing to fake great accomplishments, they'd have a second one by now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Ouch.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ...Too mean?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: That burn was so harsh I think you deorbited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1071:_Exoplanets&amp;diff=25608</id>
		<title>Talk:1071: Exoplanets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1071:_Exoplanets&amp;diff=25608"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T07:12:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hmm... this comic and 786 have the same title. Is that a mistake? [[User:Castriff|Jimmy C]] ([[User talk:Castriff|talk]]) 01:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It may very well have been on {{xkcd}} itself; there was a bit of a snafu when Randall posted the image.  That's part of the reason why we decided on number+name here, to ensure that that sort of naming collision couldn't be repeated. -- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 04:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image isn't appearing for me. I think it's a problem with the thumbnail system. [[User:Bugefun|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun|talk]]) 18:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here. Using Chrome. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 19:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Same on ipad. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 07:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1070:_Words_for_Small_Sets&amp;diff=25607</id>
		<title>Talk:1070: Words for Small Sets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1070:_Words_for_Small_Sets&amp;diff=25607"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T07:09:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I disagree on &amp;quot;A Handful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Several&amp;quot;.  A Handful should be about 4 to 7 and several should be 6 to 8, averaging about 7, which sounds just like several.  The other two are within the range that makes sense to me.  Also, check out how he sneaks &amp;quot;a couple of friends&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;all three of them&amp;quot; into the image text very sneakily. [[User:Jeff]] - From the blog&lt;br /&gt;
:Dude, that's the point. You've been trolled. --[[User:Castriff|Jimmy C]] ([[User talk:Castriff|talk]]) 11:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several is two or more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A handful to me is just that. A dozen berries, one hand grenade, 2-3 sticks of TNT, a bird (2 in a bush else where gives 3) or a wild blonde (more than 1 way to be a handful I guess). [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 07:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1064:_Front_Door&amp;diff=25600</id>
		<title>Talk:1064: Front Door</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1064:_Front_Door&amp;diff=25600"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T02:27:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What kind of place does Randall live in, to be so afraid of being outside at night? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 13:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legal professionals  take note of potential suspect or scapegoat. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 02:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1063:_Kill_Hitler&amp;diff=25598</id>
		<title>1063: Kill Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1063:_Kill_Hitler&amp;diff=25598"/>
				<updated>2013-01-17T02:25:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1063&lt;br /&gt;
| date = June 1, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Kill Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
| image = kill_hitler.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Revised directive: It is forbidden for you to interfere with human history until you've at least taken a class on it.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, which I believe Randall created just to put in &amp;quot;BRB, Killing Hitler&amp;quot;, [[Black Hat]] creates a one use time machine.  [[Cueball]] selects the most common suggestion for Time Machine usage &amp;quot;Killing Hitler&amp;quot;.  Black Hat finally relents and goes to kill Hitler, however, he goes to the year 1945, when Hitler is already in his bunker.  Hitler has already committed his atrocities and the war was already turning against him.  Later in 1945, he reportedly died by suicide in that very same bunker.  The joke in here being that Black Hat didn't save any lives or prevent the Holocaust or a global war by killing him in 1945 because he went back in time too late.  He needed to go earlier, before his rise to power, like 1932. This is also the point of the image text, which states that you cannot travel back in time unless you know what has/will occur.&lt;br /&gt;
It is surprising that Black Hat did not stay and replace Hitler and do a better job thus altering History and maybe becoming his own descendant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat and Cueball stand in front of a double door, which bears the label &amp;amp;#39;TIME door&amp;amp;#39;. Black Hat has his hands on his hips.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: I finished my time machine, but it&amp;amp;#39;s one-use only.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: You gotta kill Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat, one hand palm upward.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: You are you so obsessed with this Hitler guy? We have all of time we could explore!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Cueball with both hands palm upward.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: He&amp;amp;#39;s evil incarnate! He murdered millions and sparked global war! Everyone agrees -- if you get a time machine, you kill Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat enters the now open Time door as the other man looks on..]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Fine, fine, I get it! Calm down. - BRB, killing Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat returns and shuts the door, the other man has outstretched arms.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: There. Done. Are you happy? &lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: He was in some kind of bunker. 1945 was loud!&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: NO!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hitler]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1034:_Share_Buttons&amp;diff=25580</id>
		<title>1034: Share Buttons</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1034:_Share_Buttons&amp;diff=25580"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T18:45:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1034&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 26, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Share Buttons&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = share_buttons.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The only post to achieve perfect balance between the four was a hilarious joke about Mark Zuckerberg getting caught using a pseudonym to sneak past the TSA.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a commentary on what sort of articles work best on different {{w|social networking services}}. From left to right the share buttons are: {{w|Facebook}}, {{w|Twitter}}, {{w|Reddit}}, and {{w|Google Plus}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The comedy article is shared most on Twitter because everyone on Twitter considers themselves some sort of 140-character comedian.  (140 characters is the limit of a single tweet.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conspiracy theory articles play well on Reddit, especially if they are against the {{w|Christian Right}} and for {{w|Wikipedia}}; as there is a loud and large atheist community there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Boycott Facebook articles (or other Facebook &amp;quot;is changing their terms of services to...&amp;quot;) are very popular on Facebook, which is always obviously ironic.  Also, this is the highest number of shares on Google plus, Google's fledgling social network.  One of the punchlines, of course, is that Google Plus is struggling and not popular overall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the last article gets very few shares, because few want to admit they are reading an article about a Realdoll. (Also referenced in in the title texts of [[Game AIs]] and [[Flying Cars]].) It's a sex doll. The only sharers are from Google+. Could it be that [http://scepticemia.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/meanwhile-google-plus-640.jpg the few people at Google+] easily can feel quite lonely there? Potentially Google+ users feel they can post anything there since &amp;quot;no one&amp;quot; will see it with such a low number of users. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Title text breakdown===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''a hilarious joke'' – '''Twitter'''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''about {{w|Mark Zuckerberg}}'' – '''Facebook'''; he was a founder.&lt;br /&gt;
* ''using a pseudonym'' – '''Google+'''; there was a [http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9218649/Google_works_to_soothe_users_over_real_name_controversyremember controversy about using real names].&lt;br /&gt;
* ''to sneak past the {{w|Transportation Security Administration|TSA}}'' – '''Reddit'''; a conspiracy theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A series of article titles with four share buttons underneath each: Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, and Google+]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Breaking Into Stand-up Comedy&lt;br /&gt;
:FB: 3, Twitter: 1,781, Reddit: 2, G+: 0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How the Christian Right Threatens Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
:FB: 1, Twitter: 0, Reddit: 2,241, G+: 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Boycott Facebook Today!&lt;br /&gt;
:FB: 248k, Twitter: 0, Reddit: 0, G+: 74&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DIY: Installing a Custom ROM on a Realdoll&lt;br /&gt;
:FB: 0, Twitter: 0, Reddit: 0, G+: 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social networking]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1023:_Late-Night_PBS&amp;diff=25578</id>
		<title>1023: Late-Night PBS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1023:_Late-Night_PBS&amp;diff=25578"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T17:41:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1023&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 29, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Late-Night PBS&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = late_night_pbs.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then it switched to these old black-and-white tapes of Bob Ross slumped against the wall of an empty room, painting the least happy trees you've ever seen. Either PBS needs to beef up studio security or I need to stop using Ambien to sleep.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, Megan falls asleep with the TV on after watching Downton Abbey.  When she wakes up, around 3 AM, Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego is airing.  Unlike typical late night TV, which is usually re-runs of previously recorded episodes, she claims that the episode she watched is set in the modern day (i.e. PBS had ordered new episodes of the show) and all of the people on the show have aged accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|PBS}} stands for Public Broadcasting Service and is an American TV broadcaster that is predominantly supported by the viewers themselves through pledge drives. It often runs (and sometimes co-produces) acclaimed British {{w|costume drama}}s, including the mentioned &amp;quot;{{w|Downton Abbey}}&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;{{w|Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego}}&amp;quot; was a {{w|computer game}} series in the mid-80s.  The series moved to a {{w|Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego (Game Show)|game-show TV series}} in the early from around 1990 to 1995.  The point of the series was to learn about geography and the world while playing a game or watching a game show.  {{w|Carmen Sandiego}} was a mysterious character that you tracked around the globe, attempting to find clues to find out where she was headed to next.  The show was split into 3 rounds.  In the first round, there were 3 sleuths.  Each question they got right gave them additional points.  The top 2 scoring sleuths moved onto the next round, where they had to place a game( like the game Memory) where they had to find the thief, warrant, and loot in the correct order.  Whichever sleuth did so captured the thief, saved the loot, and moved onto the next round, where they had a chance to catch Carmen Sandiego herself.  Success was not always guaranteed in this round, as contestants had to plant flags correct on 7 different countries in a continent within a very short time period.  If the sleuth was successfully able to do this, they captured Carmen and won the grand prize (a trip to a place of their choosing in the continental US).  If not, Carmen would escape and the sleuth would win a lesser prize (like a computer).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The role of The Chief was played by {{w|Lynne Thigpen}} (RIP), a role she played in all 3 computer games (Where in the USA, Where in the World, and Where in Time Is Carmen Sandiego) and both TV shows (Where in Time and Where in the World).  She was responsible for telling the detectives (sleuths) what had been stolen, which of Carmen's thieves was suspected of stealing it, and some relevant information about their last whereabouts (effectively, telling the sleuths what their mission was).  Whenever the detectives would catch a thief (or Carmen), she would appear and congratulate them or console them if Carmen got away (unlike what she does here).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The host of the TV show was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Lee_%28actor%29 Greg Lee].  When the show originally aired, Greg was in his last 20's/early 30's.  His job was to ask the questions of the contestants and tell them which flags to plant on the map in the final round, as well as engage in silly situations with The Chief and Rockapella to keep the show moving and provide clues.  If the show were still airing today in 2012 he would be 50, hence the aging joke.  This comic is not the first time a host of one of the Carmen Sandiego TV shows was mocked and shown as drinking on the job; Robot Chicken showed a similar scenario with the host of Where in Time Is Carmen Sandiego in 2010 ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EIULR-zLEk link] -- the voice of the host in the skit is the voice of the actual host from Where in Time is Carmen Sandiego).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Rockapella}} was the '{{w|A cappella}}' group (keeping up the tradition of punny names for a cappella groups) which sang the theme song to &amp;quot;Where in The World Is Carmen Sandiego.&amp;quot;  'A cappella' is a loan word from Italian meaning &amp;quot;''in the manner of the Church''&amp;quot; hearkening back to {{w|Gregorian chant}}; in the 19th century the term evolved to mean any vocalization without accompaniment.  In the TV version of Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego, Rockapella also acted as a &amp;quot;house band&amp;quot; of sorts, singing songs while the contestants transitioned between events, providing clues, playing pranks on Greg Lee, etc.  At the end of each show, Greg Lee and the episode's winning contestant would shout &amp;quot;Do it, Rockapella!&amp;quot; at which point the band would sing the shows theme song.  Thus, it is unsurprising that they would be on the set when the contestants captured Carmen Sandiego.  The humorous part is that, instead of singing, like everyone else in this comic, they make the contestants feel uncomfortable by glaring at them (something they would never do).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego TV show, the places the contestants went were always portrayed as fun and happy, unlike the places that they have to visit in this comic.  Situations like those mentioned in this comic were never really discussed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Mogadishu}} is a battle-torn city in {{w|Somalia}}, where there was the aptly named &amp;quot;{{w|Battle of Mogadishu (1993)|Battle of Mogadishu}}&amp;quot; in 1993, which would coincide with the air dates of &amp;quot;Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego&amp;quot; game show.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|The Killing Fields}} are a number of sites in {{w|Cambodia}} where large numbers of people were killed and buried by the {{w|Khmer Rouge}} regime, during its rule of the country from 1975 to 1979, immediately after the end of the {{w|Cambodian Civil War}} (1970-1975).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reference to &amp;quot;A Bookshelf in a Dutch Apartment&amp;quot; is a reference to {{w|Anne Frank}}, who was a Jewish girl who hid from the {{w|Nazi}}s in a Secret Annex hidden behind a bookshelf in an apartment in {{w|Amsterdam, Netherlands}}.  She wrote the famous diary, {{w|Diary of Anne Frank}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One continuity issue in this comic is that the places they have to visit in this episode seem to require traveling to different periods in time (1993, 1975-1979, 1940's, respectively).  Episodes of Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego usually did not deal with this -- this is what the TV show Where in Time Is Carmen Sandiego (the successor to Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego, albeit with a different house band and a different host) did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last frame also makes mention of how some programs intended for children often have subtle themes for adults who may be watching the show with their children.  SpongeBob Squarepants and The Fairly OddParents are other [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpongeBob_SquarePants#Reception examples] of shows that have hidden meanings in things for the adults watching the show with their children.  The joke in the panel is that these sorts of underlying themes were always present in the show, but the young/less mature viewers weren't able to pick up on them.  When Cueball expresses his doubt that the show was this dark when he watched it (presumably as a kid in the early 1990's), Megan tells him exactly this, that maybe these scenarios were always there but they were too young to understand them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text there is a reference to {{w|Bob Ross}}, a famous painter with a painting show on PBS called &amp;quot;{{w|The Joy of Painting}}&amp;quot; that ran for 12 years. Bob Ross was known for using &amp;quot;happy little _____&amp;quot; to describe components of his paintings. For example while painting trees he would encourage viewers to add &amp;quot;happy little trees&amp;quot; to their paintings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Ambien}}, also known as Zolpidem, is a prescription medication used for the treatment of insomnia, as well as some brain disorders. Known side effects are vivid dreams and hallucinations if you wake up (or haven’t yet fallen asleep) while it is still active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the joke in the title text is that Randall/Megan isn't sure if his is hallucinating from taking Ambien, or if something horrible has happened because PBS's security staff isn't large enough.  The entire comic, in general, revolves around this notion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan is rubbing sleep out of her eyes and talking to Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Have you ever watched PBS late at night?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: I fell asleep after Downton and woke up at like 3 AM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The upper portion of the panel continues dialogue, while the lower shows a drunk gameshow host and several contestants. The monitor shows a field of crosses, presumably graves.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan:  Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego was back on, except the host hadn't aged well and he'd clearly been drinking.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Every question took them to some horrible place like Mogadishu or the Cambodian killing fields.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Now it shows a bookshelf revealing a hidden room.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: The kids were freaked out, but they kept playing. Eventually they were told they'd found Carmen Sandiego hiding behind a bookshelf in a Dutch apartment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: The Chief appeared and asked &amp;quot;Are you proud of what you've become?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Then Rockapella walked out and just glared at the kids until they started crying.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I, uh, don't remember the old show being that dark.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Maybe we were too young to pick up on it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1009:_Sigh&amp;diff=25523</id>
		<title>1009: Sigh</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1009:_Sigh&amp;diff=25523"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T01:29:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1009&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 27, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Sigh&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = sigh.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you're annoying enough, you can get them to respond with an involuntary second sigh and get a rhythm going.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is mispronouncing the name of the British TV show, that is also currently shown in the US, which is {{w|Downton Abbey|Downton Abbey}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|LMFAO}} is a ubiquitous group in the US on radio, TV and even strange commercials with [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zJWA3Vo6TU rodents riding in cars with their song, Party Rock Anthem]. However, this comic is a reference to another one of their songs, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyx6JDQCslE &amp;quot;Sexy And I Know It.&amp;quot;] The relevant lyrics go something like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''sigh''… girl look at that body&lt;br /&gt;
:''sigh''… girl look at that body&lt;br /&gt;
:''sigh''… girl look at that body&lt;br /&gt;
:ah-ah, I work out!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing behind Megan, who's sitting and watching TV.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Hey, is that ''Downtown Abbey''? What town is it in the downtown of, anyway?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''*siiiiiiiigh*''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''--girl look at that body.''&lt;br /&gt;
:We should thank ''LMFAO'' for giving us such a great way to respond to exasperated sighs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Music]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1002:_Game_AIs&amp;diff=25522</id>
		<title>Talk:1002: Game AIs</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1002:_Game_AIs&amp;diff=25522"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T01:04:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Mornington Crescent would be impossible for a computer to play, let alone win... {{unsigned|188.29.119.251}}&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear which side of the line jeopard fall upon. Why so close to the line I wonder. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 01:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1001:_AAAAAA&amp;diff=25521</id>
		<title>Talk:1001: AAAAAA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1001:_AAAAAA&amp;diff=25521"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T01:00:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The usefulness of rotation in romance has been mentioned before in [[162: Angular Momentum]]. Perhaps the problem is that they are spinning the bed clockwise instead of counter-clockwise? [[User:Erenan|Erenan]] ([[User talk:Erenan|talk]]) 19:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
I think the difference lies in the commonly understood meaning of rotation as opposed to say spinning. Rotating can mean slow or fast, but spinning is usually faster. Is there a word that implies a gentleness to the rotation. They probably want a pivoting or turning bed. [[User:DruidDriver|DruidDriver]] ([[User talk:DruidDriver|talk]]) 01:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=998:_2012&amp;diff=25520</id>
		<title>998: 2012</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=998:_2012&amp;diff=25520"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T00:49:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 998&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 2, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = 2012.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = To compensate for this, I plan to spend 2013 doing nothing but talking about Mayans. My relationships with my friends and family may not fare well.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
Happy New Year everyone!  This comic is in reference to the fact that the {{w|Maya civilization|Mayans}}, an ancient civilization in the {{w|Central America|America}}s, created a calendar that ends on Dec 21st, 2012.  This date is regarded as the end-date of a 5,125-year-long cycle in the calendar used by the Mayan culture.  Some therefore consider that the world is going to end on that date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, a lot of people are talking about the Mayans, concerned that the world might end.  Once December 21st, 2012 passes, everyone will be less concerned about the Mayans, because the world will not have ended. (Or it will have ended.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a measure of irony to be had in how the Mayans who still exist today were largely ignored by the doomsayers. &amp;quot;Or acknowledging that huge city-building ancient American civilizations existed at all.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the final frame, [[Megan]] parodies the phrase, &amp;quot;Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it,&amp;quot; applying a twist to suggest an academic context.  In most American schools, a Grade Point Average is computed by assigning numeric value to each letter grade: A=4, B=3, C=2, D=1, and F=0; receiving high marks (all A's) thus yields a 4.0 GPA.  However, if you &amp;quot;Fail to learn from History&amp;quot; — that is, get a failing grade, F, and had at least 3 other classes (not an unusual course load) — you would still get a 3.0 with A's in those other classes.  She is making the callous — if roundabout — observation that failing to grasp history, while no doubt troubling, isn't an academic show-stopper (perhaps explaining why so many Americans are so bad at it.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball and Megan are talking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Well, it's 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:((This panel has no upper and lower borders.))&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Yup.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Only 354 days left until everybody abruptly stops talking about Mayans.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Or thinking about Mayans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Or acknowledging that huge city-building ancient American civilizations existed at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: You know what they say — those who fail to learn from history can still manage a 3.0 if they ace their other subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=992:_Mnemonics&amp;diff=25519</id>
		<title>992: Mnemonics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=992:_Mnemonics&amp;diff=25519"/>
				<updated>2013-01-16T00:37:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;DruidDriver: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 992&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 19, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Mnemonics&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = mnemonics.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Sailor Moon's head exploded once' and 'Some men have explosive orgasms' both work for the Great Lakes from west to east (Paddle-to-the-Sea order).&lt;br /&gt;
}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
Here we have six different science mnemonics.  A {{w|mnemonic}} is (thanks Wikipedia!) any learning technique that aids memory. Mnemonics rely on associations between easy-to-remember constructs which can be related back to the data that are to be remembered. This is based on the observation that the human mind much more easily remembers spatial, personal, surprising, physical, sexual or humorous or otherwise meaningful information, as compared to retrieving arbitrary sequences. To improve long term memory, mnemonic systems are used to make memorization easier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The category is listed at the top of the box, the members are listed below that.  Then there is the traditional mnemonic that children are usually taught in school to help them remember.  Below the comic is one or two options for new mnemonics suggested by Randall.  The top one is illustrated in the frame.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|SI}} Prefixes are the prefixes for the systems of units from large to small and since there are so many, the mnemonic needs two lines. {{w|Karl Marx}}, as he is seen in the comic, was a German philosopher, economist, sociologist, historian, journalist, and revolutionary socialist.  {{w|Microsoft}}'s {{w|Zune}} was a failed mp3 player that Microsoft brought to market and never &amp;quot;caught on&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Taxonomy}} is the science of identifying and naming species. {{w|Katy Perry}} is an {{w|America}} {{w|pop music}} singer, who's popular songs are ones like &amp;quot;Fireworks&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I Kissed A Girl&amp;quot;.  And that is the stick figure of her in the illustration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the geologic periods frame, the illustration is of a month's worth of &amp;quot;the pill&amp;quot; a common contraceptive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In {{w|Resistor}} Color Codes, {{w|Glenn Beck}} is in the illustration.  Beck is a far-right conservative commentator in the US, who used to have a show on the {{w|Fox News}} Network.&lt;br /&gt;
**The sign Glenn Beck is holding is a reference to [[966: Jet Fuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the Planets frame, the illustration is of Mary and Joseph, who in the story of the Birth of Jesus in the Bible, were mother and father to Jesus.  However, Mary's conception of Jesus was from God and Mary was still considered a virgin.  This mnemonic shows Joseph not really believing that story. Ironically the upstairs neighbour could have multiple meanings as you can't get more upstairs than heaven and thus God. Given the stance most xkcd comics take on religion, it is likely a corporeal neighbor that is being suspected, but it is curious that a neighbor of the upstairs variety is specifically referenced especially given the lack of urban density in the time of Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
**Most traditional Planets mnemonics include Pluto, which was &amp;quot;officially&amp;quot; considered a planet before 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
XKCD Presents: Some New Science Mnemonics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pattern goes: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
((Subject&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elements&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional mnemonic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contents of frame&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New mnemonics))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Order of Operations'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parentheses, Exponents, Division &amp;amp; Multiplication, Addition &amp;amp; Subtraction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional: Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Person having a shark delivered to his laptop]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Email My Dad A Shark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People Expect More Drugs And Sex&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''SI Prefixes'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big: Kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera, Peta, Exa, Zetta, Yotta&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Milli, Micro, Nano, Pico, Femto, Atto, Zepto, Yocto&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Graph of the declining profits of the Zune)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Karl Marx delivering a number of zeppelins to a bunch of confused proletariats]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big: Karl Marx Gave The Proletariat Eleven Zeppelins, Yo&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small: Microsoft Made No Profit From Anyone's Zunes, Yo &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Taxonomy'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional: King Philip Came Over For Good Sex&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Katy Perry: I'm not sure who doubts this, really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Katy Perry Claims Orgasms Feel Good Sometimes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kernel Panics Crash Our Family Game System. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Geologic Periods'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Precambrian), Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, &lt;br /&gt;
Paleogene, Neogene&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional: [I never learned one]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[A month's set of birth control pills]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PolyCystic Ovarian Syndrome Does Cause Problems That Judicious Contraceptives Partially Negate &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Resistor Color Codes'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Violet, Gray, White&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional: [none I care for]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Glenn Beck holding the traditional &amp;quot;Nanobot Vaccine Chemtrail 9 11&amp;quot; sign]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Big Brother Reptilian Overlords&amp;quot;, yelled Glenn, &amp;quot;Brainwashing Via Ground water!!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be Bold, Respect Others; You'll Gradually Become Versatile, Great Wikipedians! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Planets'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional: My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nachos&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[A pregnant Mary attempting to explain things to an incredulous Joseph]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mary's &amp;quot;Virgin&amp;quot; Explanation Made Joseph Suspect Upstairs Neighbor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Airships]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DruidDriver</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>