<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ExternalMonolog</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ExternalMonolog"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/ExternalMonolog"/>
		<updated>2026-04-27T21:50:54Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1878:_Earth_Orbital_Diagram&amp;diff=144395</id>
		<title>Talk:1878: Earth Orbital Diagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1878:_Earth_Orbital_Diagram&amp;diff=144395"/>
				<updated>2017-08-22T22:08:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I guess first off, we should note the &amp;quot;solstice&amp;quot; is *not* the Bristish equivalent of &amp;quot;equinox&amp;quot; -- they are actually opposites.  The equinoxes occur in April and September, when the day &amp;amp; night are equal length, and the solstices occur in June and December, when the length of daylight and nightime, respectively, are at their longest. [[User:JamesCurran|JamesCurran]] ([[User talk:JamesCurran|talk]]) 15:30, 18 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Technically, the opposite of solstice is the other solstice. Solstice and equinoxes are orthogonal. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being picky but the Equinox/Solstice section refers to equinoxes marking the start of either spring or autumn, but actually both equinoxes mark the beginning of both spring and autumn in opposite hemispheres. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 22:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Determinant of the date of Easter&amp;quot; refers to the fact that in the Catholic Church (and possibly other Christian denomiations) the date of Easter is the first Sunday after the first full moon of Spring, which means it is an astronomical calculation, but completely unrelated to the indicated angle.  [[User:JamesCurran|JamesCurran]] ([[User talk:JamesCurran|talk]]) 16:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, everyone celebrates Easter on the same day, right? So it's the first Sunday after the first full moon for everybody. [[User:Berets|Berets]] ([[User talk:Berets|talk]]) 23:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No, not all denominations agree on the date of Easter; a particular example being the Orthodox church, which usually has Easter a week after the Catholic church, but sometimes as much as five weeks later. The difference is caused by the two denominations using different idealized calendars, both lunar and solar, as well as a slight difference in the definition. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.57|162.158.69.57]] 18:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Astral planes&amp;quot; might as well be a Unicode reference, taking into account Randall's occasional mention of emoji, since emoji reside on one of the astral planes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_%28Unicode%29 {{unsigned ip|141.101.105.168}}&lt;br /&gt;
:That supplementary planes humorously refer also to {{w|Astral plane|Astral planes}} as mentioned in this explanation.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solstice comes from the Latin ... Sol = Sun .. Sistere = Stand still. It literally means the day the sun stands still and refers to the longest day of the year (summer) and the shortest day of the year (winter). So how does the Sun &amp;quot;stand still&amp;quot;. On those days the Earth reaches either end of orbital ellipse and returns around the other side. If you stick a pole in the ground and observe its shadow every day at Noon you will see the shadow grow longer every day from winter to summer and grow shorter every day from summer to winter. The shadow is shortest when the Sun is highest in the sky at mid-summer and the shadow is longest when the sun is lowest in the sky at mid-winter. The sun is either getting higher in the sky or lower in the sky every day. When the Earth is at the end of the ellipse and the transition takes place the shadow will not make any noticeable change from one day to the next and one could say that the &amp;quot;Sun has stood still&amp;quot;. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 19:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Solstice/Equinox thing is a reference to Randall having a hobby of spreading linguistic misinformation, as seen in 1677:Contrails.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.251|172.68.26.251]] 00:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure what the labels of the planes are, but they certainly aren't Greek letters. They look like alchemical symbols to me.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.243|162.158.74.243]] 00:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of the humor of Declension is that it's a portmanteau of right ascension and declination. Right now only declination is mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.40|162.158.75.40]] 02:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arctangent is also a music festival in the UK, happening when this comic came out. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.234.46|162.158.234.46]] 22:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1842:_Anti-Drone_Eagles&amp;diff=140423</id>
		<title>Talk:1842: Anti-Drone Eagles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1842:_Anti-Drone_Eagles&amp;diff=140423"/>
				<updated>2017-05-28T03:15:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Okay... I actually had an out loud laugh at the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; ...  &amp;quot;and compares it to using police dogs for traffic control, which people would generally frown upon.[citation needed]&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.250|141.101.98.250]] 06:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I said a few weeks ago, this site gets the best &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot;s, I swear someone looks for places to put them with the best comedic value. LOL! One of my faves was when there was a &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on the statement that a baby would be unable to plan and implement a jewel heist. :) There was another good one a couple of weeks ago, where I made the comment, but I forget what. - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.16|108.162.219.16]] 07:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Got it! 1822, there's a &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on the statement that 5 million years is longer than the lifespan of a human. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.16|108.162.219.16]] 08:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:180: Canada &amp;quot;[...] Canada is part of reality(citation needed)&amp;quot; Loving it :) -- [[User:Unkn0wnCat|Unkn0wnCat]] ([[User talk:Unkn0wnCat|talk]]) 13:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh man, sometimes I'm Black Hat, sometimes I'm Cueball, but somehow Randall is reading my mind three times a week. May the algorithm protect him. (I'm confused: My signature already looks like a bunch of &amp;quot;~~&amp;quot;... Now what?) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.16|162.158.75.16]] 08:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:EXACT. SAME. HERE. Randall is psychic and does the kind of stuff that is SO AWESOME (or funny) that his fanbase should be 3 times its size. [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 11:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Damn it, who linked to tvtropes? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.143.216|172.68.143.216]] 17:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Proposing a domain-wide feature here: a little popup tooltip that displays a warning everytime you hover your mouse over a tv-tropes link. Something on the lines of &amp;quot;Warning! See [[609: Tab Explosion]]. Hold CTRL while clicking on the link to continue. You have been warned.&amp;quot; Actually, make that a standard plugin in every browser. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.162|162.158.90.162]] 19:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I added a mouse-over warning text, which works when you use the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{tvtropes}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template. Give it a try! &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;--[[User:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nialpxe&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]], 2017. [[User_talk:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(Arguments welcome)&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, who says &amp;quot;ineffective&amp;quot; when it has been implemented? I really want to delete that paragraph, but I would like some support. [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 18:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I concur. It might be potentially wasteful, but it seems to be working effectively where it has been tried. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;--[[User:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nialpxe&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]], 2017. [[User_talk:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(Arguments welcome)&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:This is not about the comic, directly anyway, but it occurred to me that there are hundreds of millions of kilowatt level magnetrons floating around in microwave ovens everywhere. If one of these was coupled to a suitably narrow angle horn antenna, could anybody offer a guess of over what kind of range could this setup fry the electronics in a drone? (!) Just wondering. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 03:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139136</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139136"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T01:04:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)   &lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the choices of 50% and 20 years is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both parties. Unless of course your life expectancy is less than 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:And don't forget all the dog bites that came out &amp;quot;just fine&amp;quot;! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139135</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139135"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:58:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)   &lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the 50% over 20 years option is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both parties. Unless of course your life expectancy is less than 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:And don't forget all the dog bites that came out &amp;quot;just fine&amp;quot;! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139134</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139134"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:52:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Edit of my own damn comments!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the 50% over 20 years option is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both parties. Unless of course your life expectancy is less than 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139133</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139133"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:50:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the 50% over 20 years option is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both partys.Unless of course your life expectancy is less than 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139132</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139132"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:47:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the 50% over 20 years option is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both partys.Unless of course your life expectancy is lessthan 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139131</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139131"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:43:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the 50% over 20 years option is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period 20 years needs a return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both parties. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139130</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139130"/>
				<updated>2017-04-22T00:31:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment on comment; payment types.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138147</id>
		<title>Talk:1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138147"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T15:13:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I keep trying to correct the misspelled joung Girl to Young Girl but it keeps reverting. I corrected the two non-capitalized sentences and they stay put. Does &amp;quot;joung&amp;quot; have a meaning i don't understand? [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138146</id>
		<title>1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138146"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T14:58:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1818&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 31, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rayleigh Scattering&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rayleigh_scattering.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you ask &amp;quot;why are leaves green?&amp;quot; the usual answer is &amp;quot;because they're full of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll is green,&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;why does chlorophyll scatter green light?&amp;quot; is a great question too.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incomplete explanation TBD: Integrate characters}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic deals with the tendency of physicists for explaining everything in the most complete and physically accurate way possible, often explaining things in a more elaborate way than necessary causing major confusion in inexperienced listeners. This is demonstrated by the explanation on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation why the sky is blue], going into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics quantum mechanical] properties of air, whereas a much simpler explanation, such as air being blue, also adequately explains the phenomenon, and is probably much more understandable to less physically inclined listeners. The last panel takes this explanation to the extremes by claiming that airplanes stay up because they have thousands of birds in their wings that hold them up by flapping. This, while certainly easier to understand, is much farther from reality than the explanation in the previous panels, as birds inside a plane would be unable to lift it by flapping their wings{{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title of the comic refers to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering rayleigh scattering], the process which is commonly named as the reason for why the sky is blue. This also comes up in [[1145]], where a similar situation with a physicist giving an overly complicated explanation to a child, who is unlikely to understand it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://what-if.xkcd.com/141/ What-if 141] also mentions the simpler explanation to the original question: Sunbeam has this relevant text: &amp;quot;Normal light interacts with the atmosphere through Rayleigh scattering. You may have heard of Rayleigh scattering as the answer to 'why is the sky blue.' This is sort of true, but honestly, a better answer to this question might be 'because air is blue.' Sure, it appears blue for a bunch of physics reasons, but everything appears the color it is for a bunch of physics reasons.&amp;quot; There is also a footnote in that comment with an additional example: &amp;quot;When you ask, 'Why is the statue of liberty green?' the answer is something like, 'The outside of the statue is copper, so it used to be copper-colored. Over time, a layer of copper carbonate formed (through oxidation), and copper carbonate is green.' You don't say 'The statue is green because of frequency-specific absorption and scattering by surface molecules.' &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another common question as for why leaves are green. This is commonly explained by the fact that they are filled with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll chlorophyll], a chemical used by plants for photosynthesis. Randall points out that it would be an equally valid question to ask why chlorophyll is green. This poses an interesting contrast to the answer to the question about the color of the sky, where physicists are quick to jump to describing quantum phenomena, whereas in the case of leaves they are usually satisfied by a more general explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please check for false words and correct character names?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[2 Girls Talking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: Why is the sky blue?&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Because air is blue,&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, the sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Nah, it's because air is blue. Blue light bounces off it and hits our Eyes. Same as why anything is any color,&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: It's why far-off mountains look blue - because of all the blue air in the way.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: There's a specific quantum mechanism by which -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Yeah(,) but there's a physics mechanism for every color. You don't have to get all quantum right away.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ... OK, I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Any other questions?&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: How do planes stay up?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Well, the airflow -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Tiny birds in the wings. Thousands. Flapping Hard.&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: WOW!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: NO!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138145</id>
		<title>Talk:1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138145"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T14:55:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I keep trying to correct the misspelling of joung Girl to Young Girl but it keeps reverting. I corrected the two non-capitalized sentences and they stay put. Does &amp;quot;joung&amp;quot; have a meaning i don't understand? [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138143</id>
		<title>1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138143"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T14:45:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1818&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 31, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rayleigh Scattering&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rayleigh_scattering.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you ask &amp;quot;why are leaves green?&amp;quot; the usual answer is &amp;quot;because they're full of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll is green,&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;why does chlorophyll scatter green light?&amp;quot; is a great question too.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incomplete explanation TBD: Integrate characters}}&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[1145]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic deals with the tendency of physicists for explaining everything in the most complete and physically accurate way possible, often explaining things in a more elaborate way than necessary causing major confusion in inexperienced listeners. This is demonstrated by the explanation on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation why the sky is blue], going into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics quantum mechanical] properties of air, whereas a much simpler explanation, such as air being blue, also adequately explains the phenomenon, and is probably much more understandable to less physically inclined listeners. The last panel takes this explanation to the extremes by claiming that airplanes stay up because they have thousands of birds in their wings that hold them up by flapping. This, while certainly easier to understand, is much farther from reality than the explanation in the previous panels, as birds inside a plane would be unable to lift it by flapping their wings{{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://what-if.xkcd.com/141/ What-if 141] also mentions the simpler explanation to the original question: Sunbeam has this relevant text: &amp;quot;Normal light interacts with the atmosphere through Rayleigh scattering. You may have heard of Rayleigh scattering as the answer to 'why is the sky blue.' This is sort of true, but honestly, a better answer to this question might be 'because air is blue.' Sure, it appears blue for a bunch of physics reasons, but everything appears the color it is for a bunch of physics reasons.&amp;quot; There is also a footnote in that comment with an additional example: &amp;quot;When you ask, 'Why is the statue of liberty green?' the answer is something like, 'The outside of the statue is copper, so it used to be copper-colored. Over time, a layer of copper carbonate formed (through oxidation), and copper carbonate is green.' You don't say 'The statue is green because of frequency-specific absorption and scattering by surface molecules.' &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another common question as for why leaves are green. This is commonly explained by the fact that they are filled with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll chlorophyll], a chemical used by plants for photosynthesis. Randall points out that it would be an equally valid question to ask why chlorophyll is green. This poses an interesting contrast to the answer to the question about the color of the sky, where physicists are quick to jump to describing quantum phenomena, whereas in the case of leaves they are usually satisfied by a more general explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please check for false words and correct character names?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[2 Girls Talking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: Why is the sky blue?&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Because air is blue,&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, the sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Nah, it's because air is blue. Blue light bounces off it and hits our Eyes. Same as why anything is any color,&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: It's why far-off mountains look blue - because of all the blue air in the way.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: There's a specific quantum mechanism by which -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Yeah(,) but there's a physics mechanism for every color. You don't have to get all quantum right away.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ... OK, I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Any other questions?&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: How do planes stay up?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Well, the airflow -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Tiny birds in the wings. Thousands. Flapping Hard.&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: WOW!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: NO!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138138</id>
		<title>1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138138"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T14:39:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1818&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 31, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rayleigh Scattering&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rayleigh_scattering.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you ask &amp;quot;why are leaves green?&amp;quot; the usual answer is &amp;quot;because they're full of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll is green,&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;why does chlorophyll scatter green light?&amp;quot; is a great question too.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incomplete explanation TBD: Integrate characters}}&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[1145]].&lt;br /&gt;
WhatIf 141: Sunbeam has this relevant text: &amp;quot;Normal light interacts with the atmosphere through Rayleigh scattering. You may have heard of Rayleigh scattering as the answer to 'why is the sky blue.' This is sort of true, but honestly, a better answer to this question might be 'because air is blue.' Sure, it appears blue for a bunch of physics reasons, but everything appears the color it is for a bunch of physics reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also a footnote in that comment with an additional example: &amp;quot;When you ask, 'Why is the statue of liberty green?' the answer is something like, 'The outside of the statue is copper, so it used to be copper-colored. Over time, a layer of copper carbonate formed (through oxidation), and copper carbonate is green.' You don't say 'The statue is green because of frequency-specific absorption and scattering by surface molecules.' &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic deals with the tendency of physicists for explaining everything in the most complete and physically accurate way possible, often explaining things in a more elaborate way than necessary causing major confusion in inexperienced listeners. This is demonstrated by the explanation on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation why the sky is blue], going into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics quantum mechanical] properties of air, whereas a much simpler explanation, such as air being blue, also adequately explains the phenomenon, and is probably much more understandable to less physically inclined listeners. The last panel takes this explanation to the extremes by claiming that airplanes stay up because they have thousands of birds in their wings that hold them up by flapping. This, while certainly easier to understand, is much farther from reality than the explanation in the previous panels, as birds inside a plane would be unable to lift it by flapping their wings{{cn}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another common question as for why leaves are green. This is commonly explained by the fact that they are filled with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll chlorophyll], a chemical used by plants for photosynthesis. Randall points out that it would be an equally valid question to ask why chlorophyll is green. This poses an interesting contrast to the answer to the question about the color of the sky, where physicists are quick to jump to describing quantum phenomena, whereas in the case of leaves they are usually satisfied by a more general explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please check for false words and correct character names?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[2 Girls Talking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: Why is the sky blue?&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Because air is blue.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, the sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Nah, it's because air is blue. Blue Light bounces off it and hit our Eyes. Same as why anything is any color.&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: It's why far-off mountains look blue - because of all the blue air in the way.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: There's a specific quantum mechanism by which -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Yeah(,) but there's a Physics mechanism for every color. You don't have to get all quantum right away&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ... OK, I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Any other Questions?&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: How do planes stay up?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Well, the airflow -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Tiny Birds in the Wings. Thousands. Flapping Hard.&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: WOW!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: NO!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138136</id>
		<title>1818: Rayleigh Scattering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1818:_Rayleigh_Scattering&amp;diff=138136"/>
				<updated>2017-03-31T14:36:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1818&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 31, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Rayleigh Scattering&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = rayleigh_scattering.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = If you ask &amp;quot;why are leaves green?&amp;quot; the usual answer is &amp;quot;because they're full of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll is green,&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;why does chlorophyll scatter green light?&amp;quot; is a great question too.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Incomplete explanation TBD: Integrate characters}}&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[1145]].&lt;br /&gt;
WhatIf 141: Sunbeam has this relevant text: &amp;quot;Normal light interacts with the atmosphere through Rayleigh scattering. You may have heard of Rayleigh scattering as the answer to 'why is the sky blue.' This is sort of true, but honestly, a better answer to this question might be 'because air is blue.' Sure, it appears blue for a bunch of physics reasons, but everything appears the color it is for a bunch of physics reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also a footnote in that comment with an additional example: &amp;quot;When you ask, 'Why is the statue of liberty green?' the answer is something like, 'The outside of the statue is copper, so it used to be copper-colored. Over time, a layer of copper carbonate formed (through oxidation), and copper carbonate is green.' You don't say 'The statue is green because of frequency-specific absorption and scattering by surface molecules.' &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic deals with the tendency of physicists for explaining everything in the most complete and physically accurate way possible, often explaining things in a more elaborate way than necessary causing major confusion in inexperienced listeners. This is demonstrated by the explanation on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation why the sky is blue], going into [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics quantum mechanical] properties of air, whereas a much simpler explanation, such as air being blue, also adequately explains the phenomenon, and is probably much more understandable to less physically inclined listeners. The last panel takes this explanation to the extremes by claiming that airplanes stay up because they have thousands of birds in their wings that hold them up by flapping. This, while certainly easier to understand, is much farther from reality than the explanation in the previous panels, as birds inside a plane would be unable to lift it by flapping their wings{{cn}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another common question as for why leaves are green. This is commonly explained by the fact that they are filled with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll chlorophyll], a chemical used by plants for photosynthesis. Randall points out that it would be an equally valid question to ask why chlorophyll is green. This poses an interesting contrast to the answer to the question about the color of the sky, where physicists are quick to jump to describing quantum phenomena, whereas in the case of leaves they are usually satisfied by a more general explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please check for false words and correct character names?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[2 Girls Talking]&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: Why is the sky blue?&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Because air is blue&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, the sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Nah, it's because air is blue. Blue Light bounces off it and hit our Eyes. Same as why anything is any color&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Its why far-off mountains look blue - because of all the blue air in the way.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: There's a specific quantum mechanism by which -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Yeah(,) but there's a Physics mechanism for every color. You don't have to get all quantum right away&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ... OK, I guess&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: Any other Questions?&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: How do planes stay up?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: well, the airfloww -&lt;br /&gt;
:Mother: tiny Birds in the Wings. Thousands. Flapping Hard.&lt;br /&gt;
:Young Girl: WOW!&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: NO!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1812:_Onboarding&amp;diff=137995</id>
		<title>1812: Onboarding</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1812:_Onboarding&amp;diff=137995"/>
				<updated>2017-03-29T01:21:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: /* Infrastructure Buzzwords */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1812&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 17, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Onboarding&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = onboarding.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 'So we just have a steady flow of metal piling up in our server room? Isn't that a problem?' 'Yeah, you should bring that up at our next bismuth meeting.'&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This is another one of [[Beret Guy|Beret Guy's]] mysterious  [[:Category:Beret Guy's Business|businesses]], in which he shows new employee [[Ponytail]] around the building in which the company resides. The process of showing a new employee around the business and starting to get them introduced to people and systems and procedures is often referred to as &amp;quot;{{w|onboarding}}&amp;quot; - hence the title of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Existential Welcome ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first panel starts out as a typical welcoming of the new employee to a small indie business. Very quickly, however, Beret Guy's explanation jumps to an existential viewpoint. Very rarely do conversations or introductions involve discussing the eventual fate of our bodies, and certainly not in a professional light as in this comic. Beret Guy, however, has no problem with discussing death and decay as just part of his business. This seemingly contradicts the title text in [[1493: Meeting]], where it is claimed that employees of the company can not physically die. However, this could be a new company he has started since then. Alternatively, this is a literal statement, perhaps related to the cursed Wi-Fi mentioned later in the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bikeshare ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the second panel, Beret Guy shows Ponytail the free bikeshare system this business apparently has in place. {{w|Bicycle-sharing system|Bikesharing}} is a system in which many users share one or more bikes among themselves. Typically the bikes belong to some of the members of the group who are allowing them to be used by other members who may not have one, but Beret Guy calmly remarks that this system will only exist &amp;quot;until whoever owns those bikes finds out&amp;quot;, implying that they were not donated or shared by any member of the group, but are being used without permission or the knowledge of the true owner of the bikes. This is, thus, not actually a bikeshare, and would be more properly described as theft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Printer === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the third panel, Beret Guy shows Ponytail that the laserjet is over there '''and''' the printer is over there, thus indicating that  the ''laserjet'' is not a printer. This is a bit disconcerting, since the {{w|HP LaserJet}} is in fact a common brand of {{w|laser printer}}, suggesting that his laserjet may be some rather more exotic device, such as a {{w|Laser propulsion|laser-propelled}} {{w|jet aircraft}}.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;[[1051|relevant xkcd title text]]]''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; In any case, however, the printer is not available, as it's been printing an infinite-scroll web page since 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[wikt:infinite scroll|infinite-scrolling web page]] is a web page that, as the name implies, seems to have no end. This style of webpage typically has no definite pages or sections, but instead continues to feed data to the screen as the user scrolls. In reality, trying to print one of these would only print the current section the user was viewing, and even if it was somehow able to infinitely print, the operator could theoretically cancel the operation at any time. Either this continuous printing serves some useful purpose, e.g. prints latest news, or he doesn't know how to stop it/does not care. Mistaken print jobs are sometimes notoriously difficult to stop due to many levels of buffering (application, printer driver, OS spooler, print server, printer device) and lapses in job control software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infinite scrolling (in the sense of an annoying UI design style for browsing large but finite documents) was previously covered in [[1309: Infinite Scrolling]]. A similar separation of the phrase &amp;quot;laserjet printer&amp;quot; has been explored in [[1681: Laser Products]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Infrastructure Buzzwords ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the fourth panel, Beret Guy makes three more remarks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Restrooms are all-digital—no pipes.''' While many technology standards nowadays are entirely digital, one's restroom is one of the things that most definitely should not be. A restroom without pipes would have no way to transfer bodily waste, and would most certainly be at the very least an unpleasant encounter. This could also be a pun joking with the fact that a common (in the past and reappearing recently) technology in sound amplifiers is the use of tubes, but nowadays most sound amplifiers are all-digital. So a &amp;quot;latest technology&amp;quot; restroom cannot have pipes (synonym of tubes) and has to be all-digital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Wi-Fi is very fast, but cursed.''' Fast Wi-Fi is certainly desirable, but in this case, he claims it is also cursed. Whether the curse is a side-effect of the fast Wi-Fi or totally unrelated is left unsaid, as well as what the curse is. This could possibly be a joke relating to American slang: all technology can behave inexplicably from time to time, and Wi-Fi is notorious for randomly losing connection -- this is often exaggerated and called &amp;quot;cursed&amp;quot;. Knowing Beret Guy, though, [[1772: Startup Opportunity|it's probably literal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Our server room is carbon-neutral but produces bismuth constantly.''' Normally, {{w|carbon neutrality|carbon-neutral}} would mean that it is designed to be environmentally friendly by reducing and offsetting its carbon emissions enough that it has no net effect on the environment. The term is a little bit confusing because the meaning is of course carbon-dioxide-neutral. But while carbon is not a common material used in servers, {{w|Bismuth|bismuth}} is used as lead replacement in some {{w|solder}}s. While this replacement is often used because of the toxicity of {{w|lead}}, in this case it refers to an IBM mainframe computer where the Bi&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;58&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Sn&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;42&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; alloy is used because of its low temperature soldering characteristics. So producing bismuth would destroy all the electric connections in the server. An alternative explanation is a {{w|Lead-cooled fast reactor|compact nuclear reactor}} in the server room which can both make the server room carbon-neutral ''and'' leak bismuth (by creating it in the reactor).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Lin-Manuel Miranda ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the last two panels, Beret Guy explains that Ponytail will be working on the infrastructure, which is apparently maintained by {{w|Lin-Manuel Miranda}}. He is among other things a songwriter but certainly not an engineer or anyone qualified to be responsible for an entire infrastructure. Ponytail knows about his songs and thus surprised asks if he is also an engineer. (This echoes [[1665: City Talk Pages]], which includes a train station designed by {{w|Andrew Lloyd Webber}}, a composer best known for writing ''{{w|The Phantom of the Opera}}'').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth noting that Beret Guy actually acknowledges the mistake here, claiming the mistake &amp;quot;cost a fortune.&amp;quot; This is unusual for Beret Guy, as he has of yet failed to acknowledge or recognize the oddity of every other aspect of his mysterious business, many of which are certainly stranger than this. However, he doesn't seem to mind this at all and do not wish to fire him. Instead he plans on fixing the mistake by hiring a real network engineer, Ponytail, to replace Lin-Manuel Miranda. Because, as Beret Guy continues to explain, the bright side of having Lin-Manuel Miranda in his business overshadows the lost fortune. Apparently Lin-Manuel Miranda is really nice and he makes {{w|karaoke}} nights fun, a clear reference to his songwriting ability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen, Lin-Manuel Miranda is heard singing &amp;quot;{{w|How Far I'll Go}}&amp;quot;, which is a song that he composed for the recent Disney movie ''{{w|Moana (2016 film)|Moana}}''. It was nominated for an {{w|Academy Awards|Oscar}} for {{w|Academy Award for Best Original Song|Best Original Song}} in the {{w|89th Academy Awards|2017 show}} just a few weeks prior to this comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Title Text ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions the potential dangers of having your server room constantly produce bismuth, but only as a prelude to a bismuth/business pun. Because of the earlier carbon reference, it could also be a parallel to the difficulty in convincing businesses to become more energy efficient and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, even though climate change is accelerating and these things are becoming urgent to the survival of life as we know it, as [[Randall]] has [[:Category:Climate change|often referred]] to in xkcd most vividly with [[1732: Earth Temperature Timeline]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beret Guy shakes hands with Ponytail in front of a building while he points at the two large double doors under an unreadable sign.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: Hi! Welcome to the team! &lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: We do business here and we'll turn into dirt later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beret Guy and Ponytail walk by three bikes.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: This is our main campus. &lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: We have a free bikeshare system, at least until whoever owns those bikes finds out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beret Guy points forward as they walk on.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: The LaserJet is over there, and the printer is over there. &lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: You can't use it right now; it's been printing an infinite-scroll webpage since 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on their heads.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: Restrooms are all-digital - no pipes. &lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: The WiFi is very fast, but cursed. &lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: Our server room is carbon-neutral but produces bismuth constantly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beret Guy has turned towards an off-panel Ponytail holding a hand out towards her.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: You'll be working on our infrastructure, which is currently maintained by Lin-Manuel Miranda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom out to both facing each other. From the right singing is heard from off-panel, as indicated with two musical notes.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: ...The songwriter? Is he also an engineer?&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: Nope, huge misunderstanding on our part. Cost a fortune. But he's really nice and it makes karaoke nights fun.&lt;br /&gt;
:Lin-Manuel Miranda (off-panel): ''How far I'll gooo''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]] &amp;lt;!-- Lin-Manuel Miranda  --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Beret Guy's Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Puns]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Songs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Climate change]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137739</id>
		<title>Talk:1814: Color Pattern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137739"/>
				<updated>2017-03-23T04:25:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Dean Martin version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This link, note 1, may help whomever is going to be editing the comic explanation, I don't have time this morning.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_pattern] [[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 13:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did a quick google and copy/pasted from the Wikipedia page on Moiré patterns. [[User:Xseo|Xseo]] ([[User talk:Xseo|talk]]) 13:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a copyright infringement. The contents of Wikipedia are not in the {{w|public domain}}. When using text from Wikipedia anywhere, you must indicate the license (CC-BY-SA 3.0).--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.82|162.158.150.82]] 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This is fine. Wikipedia text is licensed for re-use by anybody, provided the original is referenced; Xseo referenced the source material in his comment above, and an explicit link is given in the article; furthermore, this entire website is CC-BY-SA 3.0, as indicated in the footer on every page. [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't be the only one for whom the note emoji are not showing up.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see them either. I'm running Chrome 48 Portable. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.225|162.158.62.225]] 14:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Running Chrome 57, Chromium 53, and Firefox 52; the note emoji doesn't work on any of these (Linux Mint 17.3 64-bit).  I wonder why? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AFAIK moiree patterns would not show up on an image that have been *properly* sampled, such moiree patterns are IIRC a byproduct of poorly sampled digital images. See WP for &amp;quot;aliasing&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;digital sampling&amp;quot; for reference. My two cents... [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 14:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good Lord. 24 hours! If any of you guys are actual engineers you should be ashamed of yourselves! I am not an engineer, but I do know a a tiny bit about signal theory, hence the tip. But then again this just shows how cheap shit chinese gizmos proliferate. Quality just cost too much, haha! Just need the looks, not the brainz! Only the zombies loves them BRAINZZZZZ! hurr hurr. [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 19:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::What are you trying to say with 24 hours. At this moment the comic has been up for 6 hours... If you think the explanation could be improved this is luckily a wiki, so you could just improve instead of rant ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dean Martin version, which likely is the only version anyone younger than I has heard goes like this- When the moon hits your eye - &lt;br /&gt;
like a bigga pizza pie - &lt;br /&gt;
That's amore - - &lt;br /&gt;
When the world seems to shine - &lt;br /&gt;
like you've had too much wine - &lt;br /&gt;
That's amore [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 04:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137738</id>
		<title>Talk:1814: Color Pattern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137738"/>
				<updated>2017-03-23T04:23:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Dean Martin version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This link, note 1, may help whomever is going to be editing the comic explanation, I don't have time this morning.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_pattern] [[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 13:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did a quick google and copy/pasted from the Wikipedia page on Moiré patterns. [[User:Xseo|Xseo]] ([[User talk:Xseo|talk]]) 13:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a copyright infringement. The contents of Wikipedia are not in the {{w|public domain}}. When using text from Wikipedia anywhere, you must indicate the license (CC-BY-SA 3.0).--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.82|162.158.150.82]] 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This is fine. Wikipedia text is licensed for re-use by anybody, provided the original is referenced; Xseo referenced the source material in his comment above, and an explicit link is given in the article; furthermore, this entire website is CC-BY-SA 3.0, as indicated in the footer on every page. [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't be the only one for whom the note emoji are not showing up.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see them either. I'm running Chrome 48 Portable. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.225|162.158.62.225]] 14:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Running Chrome 57, Chromium 53, and Firefox 52; the note emoji doesn't work on any of these (Linux Mint 17.3 64-bit).  I wonder why? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AFAIK moiree patterns would not show up on an image that have been *properly* sampled, such moiree patterns are IIRC a byproduct of poorly sampled digital images. See WP for &amp;quot;aliasing&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;digital sampling&amp;quot; for reference. My two cents... [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 14:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good Lord. 24 hours! If any of you guys are actual engineers you should be ashamed of yourselves! I am not an engineer, but I do know a a tiny bit about signal theory, hence the tip. But then again this just shows how cheap shit chinese gizmos proliferate. Quality just cost too much, haha! Just need the looks, not the brainz! Only the zombies loves them BRAINZZZZZ! hurr hurr. [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 19:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::What are you trying to say with 24 hours. At this moment the comic has been up for 6 hours... If you think the explanation could be improved this is luckily a wiki, so you could just improve instead of rant ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dean Martin version, which likely is the only version anyone younger than I has heard goes like this- When the moon hits your eye&lt;br /&gt;
like a bigga pizza pie&lt;br /&gt;
That's amore&lt;br /&gt;
When the world seems to shine&lt;br /&gt;
like you've had too much wine&lt;br /&gt;
That's amore&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1812:_Onboarding&amp;diff=137461</id>
		<title>Talk:1812: Onboarding</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1812:_Onboarding&amp;diff=137461"/>
				<updated>2017-03-17T14:35:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment on bismuth and solder&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Uff, Americans really say &amp;quot;carbon-neutral&amp;quot;. Taking this literally and there is no greenhouse problem, only some black dirt... Nevertheless bismuth is an important element in electronics, not only IBM.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 08:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Given that this is Beret Guy, it doesn't have to mean solder. It's entirely possible one of his mysterious shops has sold him a generator that burns bismuth powder or something; in which case &amp;quot;produces bismuth&amp;quot; would really mean releasing it into the atmosphere in the same was most power plants release carbon. Or some kind of nuclear process that does actually produce bismuth. Or maybe someone's told him to use a server once then recycle it, and due to not knowing what they're doing the recycling team has ended up with a massive surplus of one metal. All crazy options, but this is a guy who's plumbed soup into the electrical system, so… who knows? -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.187|162.158.154.187]] 13:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering Beret Guy has shown that he was able to [[1293: Job Interview|get soup from an electric outlet]], maybe those all-digital restrooms are actually able to digitize bodily waste to dispose of it easily.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.88.22|141.101.88.22]] 08:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital Restrooms - no pipes. &lt;br /&gt;
You have to move the wase by hand, and a hand has fingers == digits? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 10:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Is it just me? Digital restrooms with no pipes together with the mention of cursed WiFi did remind me of those tubes the internet is made of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes]... ;-) --[[User:Felis Catus|Felis Catus]] ([[User talk:Felis Catus|talk]]) 11:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yes, that was my reaction also. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.10|108.162.222.10]] 11:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bismuth? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might this be over complicating things a bit? Carbon is an element. Bismuth is another element, albeit a more improbable one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That may be the only joke: they have no carbon footprint but instead spew massive amounts of bismuth, which what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To suggest this is a joke about nuclear reactor technology or (very old) mainframe assembly technology seems to be a stretch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC) Skeptic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antimony is used as a replacement for lead in common solder. Bismuth is used in low temperature solder. I have some coils of it somewhere on the desk here. (It's tough soldering to LEDs on star boards!)  [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 14:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1791:_Telescopes:_Refractor_vs_Reflector&amp;diff=134408</id>
		<title>Talk:1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1791:_Telescopes:_Refractor_vs_Reflector&amp;diff=134408"/>
				<updated>2017-01-28T09:59:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nitpick:  The refracting telescope, drawn correctly, has a mirror in the optical path (image inverter), but it is made with a special vampire reflecting material Ichorium.&lt;br /&gt;
:Doesn't the one in this image have a mirror too? at the bottom to make the image come out at the side instead of the end? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.187|162.158.89.187]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's a good point: as drawn, the refracting telescope still has a mirror and also wouldn't be able to see space vampires.  However, the refracting telescope doesn't have to have a secondary mirror, and there are plenty that don't, so it is more the drawing that is wrong rather than the text of the comic.[[User:Cmancone|Cmancone]] ([[User talk:Cmancone|talk]]) 14:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically refractors use a prism rather than a mirror at the end, though it does the same thing. Can vampires be seen in a prism? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.172|108.162.241.172]] 14:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Only if they're pink. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.219|162.158.74.219]] 14:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every time I press submit, it blocks me and makes me start over. Kynde, rather than making a small change every 30 seconds, perhaps you could do them all at once? -- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 15:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I'm sorry, I had the same problem as you. So I did not dare read it all through before I submitted, and thus so tried to fix the errors I found afterwards. That was also why I did not make the section for the real problems a subsection to the explanation so it (as the transcript) could be edited without conflicting with the other sections. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, it's {{w|network congestion}}. Sending small packets more quickly is indeed one way to get your message through, but it can lead to a tragedy of the commons. Everyone switching to larger packets is the optimal answer, but it's not a stable equilibrium. -- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 15:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody on the wiki HAVE a major in optics???? At least anybody who will see this page before MONDAY, when it will no longer be the latest??? [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 15:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A telescope mirror typically would have no chromatic aberration, as it's a front-surface mirror.  The light doesn't pass through the glass to get to the reflective material; the glass is on the back of the mirror for support. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.129|162.158.62.129]] 16:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think where the commentary says &amp;quot;This means most reflector telescopes make do with narrow apertures&amp;quot; it should be &amp;quot;refractor telescopes&amp;quot;. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 16:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FYI: Randall updated the comic, so that the refracting telescope doesn't have a mirror.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.111|162.158.74.111]] 16:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would think that the main reason for Refractors over Reflectors is that it would be easier to make one with adjustable focus, so you would not need to wear glasses and – more importantly – you might be able to use the telescope as a binocular for things like birds. I don't know of any Reflectors with a significant adjustable focus, but I'm not an astronomer either. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.28|172.68.51.28]] 17:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't there Space Vampires in Lovecraft somewhere? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.34|162.158.214.34]] 22:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important advantage of refractors that keeps them popular is the very tiny amount of internal scattered light compared to reflectors. This really stands out when viewing planets and bright objects. Everybody loves that velvety black background field that refractors can provide. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1791:_Telescopes:_Refractor_vs_Reflector&amp;diff=134407</id>
		<title>Talk:1791: Telescopes: Refractor vs Reflector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1791:_Telescopes:_Refractor_vs_Reflector&amp;diff=134407"/>
				<updated>2017-01-28T09:57:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: New comment. Advantage of refractors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Nitpick:  The refracting telescope, drawn correctly, has a mirror in the optical path (image inverter), but it is made with a special vampire reflecting material Ichorium.&lt;br /&gt;
:Doesn't the one in this image have a mirror too? at the bottom to make the image come out at the side instead of the end? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.187|162.158.89.187]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's a good point: as drawn, the refracting telescope still has a mirror and also wouldn't be able to see space vampires.  However, the refracting telescope doesn't have to have a secondary mirror, and there are plenty that don't, so it is more the drawing that is wrong rather than the text of the comic.[[User:Cmancone|Cmancone]] ([[User talk:Cmancone|talk]]) 14:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically refractors use a prism rather than a mirror at the end, though it does the same thing. Can vampires be seen in a prism? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.172|108.162.241.172]] 14:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Only if they're pink. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.219|162.158.74.219]] 14:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every time I press submit, it blocks me and makes me start over. Kynde, rather than making a small change every 30 seconds, perhaps you could do them all at once? -- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 15:26, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I'm sorry, I had the same problem as you. So I did not dare read it all through before I submitted, and thus so tried to fix the errors I found afterwards. That was also why I did not make the section for the real problems a subsection to the explanation so it (as the transcript) could be edited without conflicting with the other sections. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, it's {{w|network congestion}}. Sending small packets more quickly is indeed one way to get your message through, but it can lead to a tragedy of the commons. Everyone switching to larger packets is the optimal answer, but it's not a stable equilibrium. -- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 15:39, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody on the wiki HAVE a major in optics???? At least anybody who will see this page before MONDAY, when it will no longer be the latest??? [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 15:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A telescope mirror typically would have no chromatic aberration, as it's a front-surface mirror.  The light doesn't pass through the glass to get to the reflective material; the glass is on the back of the mirror for support. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.129|162.158.62.129]] 16:15, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think where the commentary says &amp;quot;This means most reflector telescopes make do with narrow apertures&amp;quot; it should be &amp;quot;refractor telescopes&amp;quot;. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 16:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FYI: Randall updated the comic, so that the refracting telescope doesn't have a mirror.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.111|162.158.74.111]] 16:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would think that the main reason for Refractors over Reflectors is that it would be easier to make one with adjustable focus, so you would not need to wear glasses and – more importantly – you might be able to use the telescope as a binocular for things like birds. I don't know of any Reflectors with a significant adjustable focus, but I'm not an astronomer either. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.28|172.68.51.28]] 17:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't there Space Vampires in Lovecraft somewhere? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.34|162.158.214.34]] 22:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important advantage of refractors that keeps them popular is the very tiny amount of internal scattered light compared to reflectors. This really stands out when viewing planets and bright objects. Everybody loves that velvety black background field that refractors can provide.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1768:_Settling&amp;diff=132130</id>
		<title>Talk:1768: Settling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1768:_Settling&amp;diff=132130"/>
				<updated>2016-12-05T20:33:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure it's just about places where you live(d). This scorecard is applicable to relationships of one person and surely other things as well. {{unsigned ip|162.158.91.218}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Nobody said anything about that [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 And of course the title text is about time travel or that groundhog-day-thing with Bill Murray. {{unsigned ip|162.158.91.218}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think people also may stick with what they've got due to an inability to appreciate that the resulting unhappiness and even chaos is temporary. We are prone to thinking  our present state of mind is permanent. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1768:_Settling&amp;diff=132129</id>
		<title>Talk:1768: Settling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1768:_Settling&amp;diff=132129"/>
				<updated>2016-12-05T20:32:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment on explanation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure it's just about places where you live(d). This scorecard is applicable to relationships of one person and surely other things as well. {{unsigned ip|162.158.91.218}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Nobody said anything about that [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 And of course the title text is about time travel or that groundhog-day-thing with Bill Murray. {{unsigned ip|162.158.91.218}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think people also may stick with what they've got due to an inability to appreciate that the resulting unhappiness and even chaos is temporary. We are prone to thinking that our present state of mind is permanent. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131800</id>
		<title>Talk:1766: Apple Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131800"/>
				<updated>2016-11-30T23:48:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I did my best on explaining this one... Not really sure I got the Granny Smith part right. --[[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely a desert island covered only in apple trees is not beyond all probabilities? [[User:Minimal|Minimal]] ([[User talk:Minimal|talk]]) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe his confusion on a desert island with one type of apple is because apples exhibit extreme heterozygosity meaning that any daughter apple tree will produce fruit extremely different from its parent; it would be difficult to have several plants in one area that are all the same that produce no differing offspring (at least on a deserted island...humans can intervene on actively managed orchards).  Genetically, the apple does fall very far from the tree. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is AMAZING.  I had no idea.  {{w|Apples}} --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: {{w|Apple#Cultivation| here}} [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Thanks Jack, I'm a linking idiot. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly does &amp;quot;doing their own thing&amp;quot; mean in this context? [[User:Drewthedude64|Drewthedude64]] ([[User talk:Drewthedude64|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Drewthedude64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm assuming it means it was so different, that it couldn't be categorized by a low-high line (those 1-10 scales you see everywhere) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.82|108.162.216.82]] 15:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are green while the other apples in this comic are red. Also, Granny Smith apples are more tart than sweet...these two characteristics distinguish it from many other apple breeds and is probably why he says they are doing their own thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are good all of the time (unless they're mealy). All other apples should be made into pie. Except for red delicious, which shall be cast into outer compost, where there are swine gnashing their teeth. - The Opinionated One. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.142|162.158.69.142]] 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has Randall ever explained why he doesn't like Red Delicious? Maybe not crisp enough? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 15:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that  &amp;quot;Two (apple) trees of the same variety will not pollinate each other.&amp;quot;  I am no botanist, but I'm not sure this is correct.  (The linked citation seems to blur the line between apple trees and fruit trees generally.)  I think they will pollinate each other, and will even produce fruit, but the resulting fruit will be 'unpredictable.'  No apple tree planted from seed will produce apples like its parent (except by chance), due to the heterozygosity mentioned above.  BTW, because apples will not &amp;quot;breed true,&amp;quot; this also means that every store-bought apple we've ever eaten came from a cloned or grafted tree. Apples are weird.   [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right that it isn't correct. Apple tree's may self pollinate. See [https://www.starkbros.com/tags/self-pollinating-apple-trees]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and deleted the offending paragraph. It was unquestionably wrong as it was, even according to it's own source. [[User:ChrisPwildcat|ChrisPwildcat]] ([[User talk:ChrisPwildcat|talk]]) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That isn't entirely accurate either, though. The first line of that page says that &amp;quot;'''unlike most apple trees''', self-pollinating apple trees are naturally able to set fruit by themselves&amp;quot;. Most apple trees can't self-pollinate, and because apples of the same variety are clones of each other, they register each other's pollen as their own. Self-pollinators are the exception, not the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.98|108.162.219.98]] 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Odd that he would post a comic with such a glaringly obvious mistake. Red delicious apples are best apples. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and you should not listen to that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious are the Devil... tasteless, meally... evil. Apples should be crisp and clean in flavor, that's why the misnamed 'Delicious' varieties are on the bad (evil) end and crisps and most other varieties are on the good end (edible). Maybe Granny Smiths 'do their own thing' because they are good with peanut butter.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.34|108.162.246.34]] 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious--Honey Crisp--Regular Apples--Granny Smith--PINK LADY!    Sorry! Had to put in a plug for the greatest unknown apple on the planet! They have every great characteristic an apple can have. They're juicy, crunchy, sweet, and sour. The perfect apple! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131799</id>
		<title>Talk:1766: Apple Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131799"/>
				<updated>2016-11-30T23:46:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I did my best on explaining this one... Not really sure I got the Granny Smith part right. --[[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely a desert island covered only in apple trees is not beyond all probabilities? [[User:Minimal|Minimal]] ([[User talk:Minimal|talk]]) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe his confusion on a desert island with one type of apple is because apples exhibit extreme heterozygosity meaning that any daughter apple tree will produce fruit extremely different from its parent; it would be difficult to have several plants in one area that are all the same that produce no differing offspring (at least on a deserted island...humans can intervene on actively managed orchards).  Genetically, the apple does fall very far from the tree. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is AMAZING.  I had no idea.  {{w|Apples}} --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: {{w|Apple#Cultivation| here}} [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Thanks Jack, I'm a linking idiot. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly does &amp;quot;doing their own thing&amp;quot; mean in this context? [[User:Drewthedude64|Drewthedude64]] ([[User talk:Drewthedude64|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Drewthedude64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm assuming it means it was so different, that it couldn't be categorized by a low-high line (those 1-10 scales you see everywhere) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.82|108.162.216.82]] 15:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are green while the other apples in this comic are red. Also, Granny Smith apples are more tart than sweet...these two characteristics distinguish it from many other apple breeds and is probably why he says they are doing their own thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are good all of the time (unless they're mealy). All other apples should be made into pie. Except for red delicious, which shall be cast into outer compost, where there are swine gnashing their teeth. - The Opinionated One. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.142|162.158.69.142]] 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has Randall ever explained why he doesn't like Red Delicious? Maybe not crisp enough? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 15:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that  &amp;quot;Two (apple) trees of the same variety will not pollinate each other.&amp;quot;  I am no botanist, but I'm not sure this is correct.  (The linked citation seems to blur the line between apple trees and fruit trees generally.)  I think they will pollinate each other, and will even produce fruit, but the resulting fruit will be 'unpredictable.'  No apple tree planted from seed will produce apples like its parent (except by chance), due to the heterozygosity mentioned above.  BTW, because apples will not &amp;quot;breed true,&amp;quot; this also means that every store-bought apple we've ever eaten came from a cloned or grafted tree. Apples are weird.   [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right that it isn't correct. Apple tree's may self pollinate. See [https://www.starkbros.com/tags/self-pollinating-apple-trees]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and deleted the offending paragraph. It was unquestionably wrong as it was, even according to it's own source. [[User:ChrisPwildcat|ChrisPwildcat]] ([[User talk:ChrisPwildcat|talk]]) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That isn't entirely accurate either, though. The first line of that page says that &amp;quot;'''unlike most apple trees''', self-pollinating apple trees are naturally able to set fruit by themselves&amp;quot;. Most apple trees can't self-pollinate, and because apples of the same variety are clones of each other, they register each other's pollen as their own. Self-pollinators are the exception, not the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.98|108.162.219.98]] 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Odd that he would post a comic with such a glaringly obvious mistake. Red delicious apples are best apples. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and you should not listen to that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious are the Devil... tasteless, meally... evil. Apples should be crisp and clean in flavor, that's why the misnamed 'Delicious' varieties are on the bad (evil) end and crisps and most other varieties are on the good end (edible). Maybe Granny Smiths 'do their own thing' because they are good with peanut butter.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.34|108.162.246.34]] 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious--Honey Crisp--Regular Apples--Granny Smith--PINK LADY!    Sorry! Had to put in a plug for the greatest unknown apple on the planet! They have every great characteristic an apple can have. They're juicy, crunchy, sweet, and sour. The perfect apple![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131798</id>
		<title>Talk:1766: Apple Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131798"/>
				<updated>2016-11-30T23:44:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I did my best on explaining this one... Not really sure I got the Granny Smith part right. --[[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely a desert island covered only in apple trees is not beyond all probabilities? [[User:Minimal|Minimal]] ([[User talk:Minimal|talk]]) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe his confusion on a desert island with one type of apple is because apples exhibit extreme heterozygosity meaning that any daughter apple tree will produce fruit extremely different from its parent; it would be difficult to have several plants in one area that are all the same that produce no differing offspring (at least on a deserted island...humans can intervene on actively managed orchards).  Genetically, the apple does fall very far from the tree. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is AMAZING.  I had no idea.  {{w|Apples}} --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: {{w|Apple#Cultivation| here}} [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Thanks Jack, I'm a linking idiot. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly does &amp;quot;doing their own thing&amp;quot; mean in this context? [[User:Drewthedude64|Drewthedude64]] ([[User talk:Drewthedude64|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Drewthedude64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm assuming it means it was so different, that it couldn't be categorized by a low-high line (those 1-10 scales you see everywhere) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.82|108.162.216.82]] 15:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are green while the other apples in this comic are red. Also, Granny Smith apples are more tart than sweet...these two characteristics distinguish it from many other apple breeds and is probably why he says they are doing their own thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are good all of the time (unless they're mealy). All other apples should be made into pie. Except for red delicious, which shall be cast into outer compost, where there are swine gnashing their teeth. - The Opinionated One. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.142|162.158.69.142]] 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has Randall ever explained why he doesn't like Red Delicious? Maybe not crisp enough? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 15:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that  &amp;quot;Two (apple) trees of the same variety will not pollinate each other.&amp;quot;  I am no botanist, but I'm not sure this is correct.  (The linked citation seems to blur the line between apple trees and fruit trees generally.)  I think they will pollinate each other, and will even produce fruit, but the resulting fruit will be 'unpredictable.'  No apple tree planted from seed will produce apples like its parent (except by chance), due to the heterozygosity mentioned above.  BTW, because apples will not &amp;quot;breed true,&amp;quot; this also means that every store-bought apple we've ever eaten came from a cloned or grafted tree. Apples are weird.   [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right that it isn't correct. Apple tree's may self pollinate. See [https://www.starkbros.com/tags/self-pollinating-apple-trees]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and deleted the offending paragraph. It was unquestionably wrong as it was, even according to it's own source. [[User:ChrisPwildcat|ChrisPwildcat]] ([[User talk:ChrisPwildcat|talk]]) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That isn't entirely accurate either, though. The first line of that page says that &amp;quot;'''unlike most apple trees''', self-pollinating apple trees are naturally able to set fruit by themselves&amp;quot;. Most apple trees can't self-pollinate, and because apples of the same variety are clones of each other, they register each other's pollen as their own. Self-pollinators are the exception, not the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.98|108.162.219.98]] 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Odd that he would post a comic with such a glaringly obvious mistake. Red delicious apples are best apples. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and you should not listen to that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious are the Devil... tasteless, meally... evil. Apples should be crisp and clean in flavor, that's why the misnamed 'Delicious' varieties are on the bad (evil) end and crisps and most other varieties are on the good end (edible). Maybe Granny Smiths 'do their own thing' because they are good with peanut butter.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.34|108.162.246.34]] 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious--Honey Crisp--Regular Apples--Granny Smith--PINK LADY!    Sorry! Had to put in a plug for the greatest unknown apple on the planet! They have every great characteristic an apple can have. They're juicy, crunchy, sweet, and tangy. The perfect apple![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131797</id>
		<title>Talk:1766: Apple Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131797"/>
				<updated>2016-11-30T23:41:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Correction of my earlier comment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I did my best on explaining this one... Not really sure I got the Granny Smith part right. --[[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely a desert island covered only in apple trees is not beyond all probabilities? [[User:Minimal|Minimal]] ([[User talk:Minimal|talk]]) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe his confusion on a desert island with one type of apple is because apples exhibit extreme heterozygosity meaning that any daughter apple tree will produce fruit extremely different from its parent; it would be difficult to have several plants in one area that are all the same that produce no differing offspring (at least on a deserted island...humans can intervene on actively managed orchards).  Genetically, the apple does fall very far from the tree. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is AMAZING.  I had no idea.  {{w|Apples}} --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: {{w|Apple#Cultivation| here}} [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Thanks Jack, I'm a linking idiot. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly does &amp;quot;doing their own thing&amp;quot; mean in this context? [[User:Drewthedude64|Drewthedude64]] ([[User talk:Drewthedude64|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Drewthedude64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm assuming it means it was so different, that it couldn't be categorized by a low-high line (those 1-10 scales you see everywhere) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.82|108.162.216.82]] 15:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are green while the other apples in this comic are red. Also, Granny Smith apples are more tart than sweet...these two characteristics distinguish it from many other apple breeds and is probably why he says they are doing their own thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are good all of the time (unless they're mealy). All other apples should be made into pie. Except for red delicious, which shall be cast into outer compost, where there are swine gnashing their teeth. - The Opinionated One. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.142|162.158.69.142]] 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has Randall ever explained why he doesn't like Red Delicious? Maybe not crisp enough? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 15:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that  &amp;quot;Two (apple) trees of the same variety will not pollinate each other.&amp;quot;  I am no botanist, but I'm not sure this is correct.  (The linked citation seems to blur the line between apple trees and fruit trees generally.)  I think they will pollinate each other, and will even produce fruit, but the resulting fruit will be 'unpredictable.'  No apple tree planted from seed will produce apples like its parent (except by chance), due to the heterozygosity mentioned above.  BTW, because apples will not &amp;quot;breed true,&amp;quot; this also means that every store-bought apple we've ever eaten came from a cloned or grafted tree. Apples are weird.   [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right that it isn't correct. Apple tree's may self pollinate. See [https://www.starkbros.com/tags/self-pollinating-apple-trees]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and deleted the offending paragraph. It was unquestionably wrong as it was, even according to it's own source. [[User:ChrisPwildcat|ChrisPwildcat]] ([[User talk:ChrisPwildcat|talk]]) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That isn't entirely accurate either, though. The first line of that page says that &amp;quot;'''unlike most apple trees''', self-pollinating apple trees are naturally able to set fruit by themselves&amp;quot;. Most apple trees can't self-pollinate, and because apples of the same variety are clones of each other, they register each other's pollen as their own. Self-pollinators are the exception, not the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.98|108.162.219.98]] 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Odd that he would post a comic with such a glaringly obvious mistake. Red delicious apples are best apples. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and you should not listen to that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious are the Devil... tasteless, meally... evil. Apples should be crisp and clean in flavor, that's why the misnamed 'Delicious' varieties are on the bad (evil) end and crisps and most other varieties are on the good end (edible). Maybe Granny Smiths 'do their own thing' because they are good with peanut butter.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.34|108.162.246.34]] 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious--Honey Crisp--Regular Apples--Granny Smith--PINK LADY!    Sorry! Had to put in a plug for the greatest unknown apple on the planet! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131796</id>
		<title>Talk:1766: Apple Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1766:_Apple_Spectrum&amp;diff=131796"/>
				<updated>2016-11-30T23:37:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I did my best on explaining this one... Not really sure I got the Granny Smith part right. --[[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surely a desert island covered only in apple trees is not beyond all probabilities? [[User:Minimal|Minimal]] ([[User talk:Minimal|talk]]) 15:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe his confusion on a desert island with one type of apple is because apples exhibit extreme heterozygosity meaning that any daughter apple tree will produce fruit extremely different from its parent; it would be difficult to have several plants in one area that are all the same that produce no differing offspring (at least on a deserted island...humans can intervene on actively managed orchards).  Genetically, the apple does fall very far from the tree. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: This is AMAZING.  I had no idea.  {{w|Apples}} --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: {{w|Apple#Cultivation| here}} [[User:Jacky720|Jacky720]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]]) 17:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Thanks Jack, I'm a linking idiot. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 19:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What exactly does &amp;quot;doing their own thing&amp;quot; mean in this context? [[User:Drewthedude64|Drewthedude64]] ([[User talk:Drewthedude64|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Drewthedude64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm assuming it means it was so different, that it couldn't be categorized by a low-high line (those 1-10 scales you see everywhere) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.82|108.162.216.82]] 15:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are green while the other apples in this comic are red. Also, Granny Smith apples are more tart than sweet...these two characteristics distinguish it from many other apple breeds and is probably why he says they are doing their own thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.59.197|162.158.59.197]] 15:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Granny Smith apples are good all of the time (unless they're mealy). All other apples should be made into pie. Except for red delicious, which shall be cast into outer compost, where there are swine gnashing their teeth. - The Opinionated One. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.142|162.158.69.142]] 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has Randall ever explained why he doesn't like Red Delicious? Maybe not crisp enough? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.100|162.158.69.100]] 15:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that  &amp;quot;Two (apple) trees of the same variety will not pollinate each other.&amp;quot;  I am no botanist, but I'm not sure this is correct.  (The linked citation seems to blur the line between apple trees and fruit trees generally.)  I think they will pollinate each other, and will even produce fruit, but the resulting fruit will be 'unpredictable.'  No apple tree planted from seed will produce apples like its parent (except by chance), due to the heterozygosity mentioned above.  BTW, because apples will not &amp;quot;breed true,&amp;quot; this also means that every store-bought apple we've ever eaten came from a cloned or grafted tree. Apples are weird.   [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right that it isn't correct. Apple tree's may self pollinate. See [https://www.starkbros.com/tags/self-pollinating-apple-trees]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and deleted the offending paragraph. It was unquestionably wrong as it was, even according to it's own source. [[User:ChrisPwildcat|ChrisPwildcat]] ([[User talk:ChrisPwildcat|talk]]) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That isn't entirely accurate either, though. The first line of that page says that &amp;quot;'''unlike most apple trees''', self-pollinating apple trees are naturally able to set fruit by themselves&amp;quot;. Most apple trees can't self-pollinate, and because apples of the same variety are clones of each other, they register each other's pollen as their own. Self-pollinators are the exception, not the rule. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.98|108.162.219.98]] 18:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Odd that he would post a comic with such a glaringly obvious mistake. Red delicious apples are best apples. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar and you should not listen to that person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Red Delicious are the Devil... tasteless, meally... evil. Apples should be crisp and clean in flavor, that's why the misnamed 'Delicious' varieties are on the bad (evil) end and crisps and most other varieties are on the good end (edible). Maybe Granny Smiths 'do their own thing' because they are good with peanut butter.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.34|108.162.246.34]] 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regular Apples--Red Delicious--Honey Crisp--Regular Apples--Granny Smith--PINK LADY!    Sorry! Had to put in a plug for the greatest unknown apple on the planet! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1758:_Astrophysics&amp;diff=130730</id>
		<title>Talk:1758: Astrophysics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1758:_Astrophysics&amp;diff=130730"/>
				<updated>2016-11-11T16:31:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''Two days before the release of this comic the YouTube channel Space Time from PBS Digital Studios released a new video with the title [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UNLgPIiWAg Did Dark Energy Just Disappear?]. This was based on the press coverage the paper [http://www.nature.com/articles/srep35596 Marginal evidence for cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae] got, which relates to the one referenced in this comic for dark matter.''&amp;quot; This doesn't seem relevant. Dark energy is totally unrelated to dark matter. [[User:Schroduck|Schroduck]] ([[User talk:Schroduck|talk]]) 14:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   I agree. I don't see any connection here either.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.37|108.162.237.37]] 16:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What is the flip the table over reference in title text. To make other do the same through mirror neruons? Still new explanation. Add more if you can&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The title text also uses Mirror neurons as a reference to a joke: it suggests to &amp;quot;flip this table&amp;quot;, just as a mirror flips the image in front of it.&amp;quot;   I too want to think there is a joke here about mirror behavior or something but I just don't get it. Somebody's got to come up with a clearer, and funnier, example![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 16:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97859</id>
		<title>Talk:1551: Pluto</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97859"/>
				<updated>2015-07-15T17:34:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I knew it! So my BOT was also running today. And don't miss the updates at WhatIf. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, it's pretty amazing! What is it with XKCD and Pluto these days by the way? [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 19:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:New Horizons space probe flyby of the Pluto system! I can't imagine that a space probe finally reaching a hitherto unmapped planetoid like Pluto wouldn't be exciting to certain people, especially an ex NASA guy like Randall. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pluto is moving away from the Sun - and we've learned that as it does so, it enters the snowy part of its 248-year cycle. Hmm ... didn't Ned Stark say something about this? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 22:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright, the only one that's still got me stumped is &amp;quot;moon buds.&amp;quot; The phrase has no stock meaning (Googling it turned up pictures of weed, naturally), but my best guess is this suggests moons reproduce through {{w|budding}}. Any thoughts? [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 00:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have added something. {{User:17jiangz1/signature|03:21, 15 July 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Border of pride lands&amp;quot; might also be an indirect reference to the &amp;quot;dark region&amp;quot; on Mars in 1504:opportunity, last panel, which is itself a reference to the Hyena Country of &amp;quot;Lion King.&amp;quot; [[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 09:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of other possibilities for the reference to hatching: http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/82353/giant-bird-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.9|141.101.104.9]] 10:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So Megaman needs no further explanation? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.109|141.101.99.109]] 11:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where is the north pole? I like to play geohashing there. --[[User:GeorgDerReisende|GeorgDerReisende]] ([[User talk:GeorgDerReisende|talk]]) 12:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment for Plug(inflating/deflating) is missing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.247|141.101.98.247]] 13:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those aren't bullet holes... they're speed holes! --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.97|108.162.216.97]] 13:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current explanation has that Randall has drawn &amp;quot;humorous pareidolia on top of it&amp;quot;. I may be wrong, but isn't pareidolia the psychological process of seeing faces/objects etc in patterns, rather than those objects themselves. E.g. &amp;quot;I saw a mans face on the moon because of a psychological process called pareidolia&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;I saw a pareidolia on the moon, which looked like a face&amp;quot;. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, so I changed the word &amp;quot;drawn&amp;quot; to outlined.&amp;quot; [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 15:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heart reference may be related to this popular animated gif that showed up on Reddit: http://imgur.com/7C2GfIF 15:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC) turbotong&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not originally - I believe NASA were the originator of the &amp;quot;heart&amp;quot; label, though I could be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.jpeg compression only produces those artifacts on digital images. It was designed for professional photographers and did not take into account the effects of hard edges in the image since film images have no hard edges! It just got adopted by everybody else early on so we're stuck with it even though it can work very poorly on digital images. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 17:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97858</id>
		<title>Talk:1551: Pluto</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97858"/>
				<updated>2015-07-15T17:32:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I knew it! So my BOT was also running today. And don't miss the updates at WhatIf. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, it's pretty amazing! What is it with XKCD and Pluto these days by the way? [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 19:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:New Horizons space probe flyby of the Pluto system! I can't imagine that a space probe finally reaching a hitherto unmapped planetoid like Pluto wouldn't be exciting to certain people, especially an ex NASA guy like Randall. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pluto is moving away from the Sun - and we've learned that as it does so, it enters the snowy part of its 248-year cycle. Hmm ... didn't Ned Stark say something about this? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 22:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright, the only one that's still got me stumped is &amp;quot;moon buds.&amp;quot; The phrase has no stock meaning (Googling it turned up pictures of weed, naturally), but my best guess is this suggests moons reproduce through {{w|budding}}. Any thoughts? [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 00:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have added something. {{User:17jiangz1/signature|03:21, 15 July 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Border of pride lands&amp;quot; might also be an indirect reference to the &amp;quot;dark region&amp;quot; on Mars in 1504:opportunity, last panel, which is itself a reference to the Hyena Country of &amp;quot;Lion King.&amp;quot; [[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 09:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of other possibilities for the reference to hatching: http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/82353/giant-bird-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.9|141.101.104.9]] 10:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So Megaman needs no further explanation? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.109|141.101.99.109]] 11:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where is the north pole? I like to play geohashing there. --[[User:GeorgDerReisende|GeorgDerReisende]] ([[User talk:GeorgDerReisende|talk]]) 12:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment for Plug(inflating/deflating) is missing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.247|141.101.98.247]] 13:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those aren't bullet holes... they're speed holes! --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.97|108.162.216.97]] 13:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current explanation has that Randall has drawn &amp;quot;humorous pareidolia on top of it&amp;quot;. I may be wrong, but isn't pareidolia the psychological process of seeing faces/objects etc in patterns, rather than those objects themselves. E.g. &amp;quot;I saw a mans face on the moon because of a psychological process called pareidolia&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;I saw a pareidolia on the moon, which looked like a face&amp;quot;. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, so I changed the word &amp;quot;drawn&amp;quot; to outlined.&amp;quot; [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 15:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heart reference may be related to this popular animated gif that showed up on Reddit: http://imgur.com/7C2GfIF 15:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC) turbotong&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not originally - I believe NASA were the originator of the &amp;quot;heart&amp;quot; label, though I could be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.jpeg compression only produces those artifacts on digital images. It was designed for professional photographers and did not take into account the effects of hard edges in the image since film has no hard edges! It just got adopted by everybody else early on so we're stuck with it even though it can work very poorly on digital images. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 17:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97857</id>
		<title>Talk:1551: Pluto</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1551:_Pluto&amp;diff=97857"/>
				<updated>2015-07-15T17:30:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: comment on jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I knew it! So my BOT was also running today. And don't miss the updates at WhatIf. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, it's pretty amazing! What is it with XKCD and Pluto these days by the way? [[User:Nk22|The Twenty-second. The Not So Only. The Nathan/Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 19:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:New Horizons space probe flyby of the Pluto system! I can't imagine that a space probe finally reaching a hitherto unmapped planetoid like Pluto wouldn't be exciting to certain people, especially an ex NASA guy like Randall. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pluto is moving away from the Sun - and we've learned that as it does so, it enters the snowy part of its 248-year cycle. Hmm ... didn't Ned Stark say something about this? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 22:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright, the only one that's still got me stumped is &amp;quot;moon buds.&amp;quot; The phrase has no stock meaning (Googling it turned up pictures of weed, naturally), but my best guess is this suggests moons reproduce through {{w|budding}}. Any thoughts? [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 00:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have added something. {{User:17jiangz1/signature|03:21, 15 July 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Border of pride lands&amp;quot; might also be an indirect reference to the &amp;quot;dark region&amp;quot; on Mars in 1504:opportunity, last panel, which is itself a reference to the Hyena Country of &amp;quot;Lion King.&amp;quot; [[User:Taibhse|Taibhse]] ([[User talk:Taibhse|talk]]) 09:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of other possibilities for the reference to hatching: http://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/82353/giant-bird-in-space&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.9|141.101.104.9]] 10:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So Megaman needs no further explanation? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.109|141.101.99.109]] 11:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where is the north pole? I like to play geohashing there. --[[User:GeorgDerReisende|GeorgDerReisende]] ([[User talk:GeorgDerReisende|talk]]) 12:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment for Plug(inflating/deflating) is missing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.247|141.101.98.247]] 13:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those aren't bullet holes... they're speed holes! --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.97|108.162.216.97]] 13:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current explanation has that Randall has drawn &amp;quot;humorous pareidolia on top of it&amp;quot;. I may be wrong, but isn't pareidolia the psychological process of seeing faces/objects etc in patterns, rather than those objects themselves. E.g. &amp;quot;I saw a mans face on the moon because of a psychological process called pareidolia&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;I saw a pareidolia on the moon, which looked like a face&amp;quot;. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, so I changed the word &amp;quot;drawn&amp;quot; to outlined.&amp;quot; [[User:Captain Video|Captain Video]] ([[User talk:Captain Video|talk]]) 15:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heart reference may be related to this popular animated gif that showed up on Reddit: http://imgur.com/7C2GfIF 15:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC) turbotong&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not originally - I believe NASA were the originator of the &amp;quot;heart&amp;quot; label, though I could be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.jpeg compression only produces those artifacts on digital images. It was designed for professional photographers and did not take into account the effects of hard edges in the image since film has no hard edges! It just got adopted by everybody early on so we're stuck with it even though it can work very poorly on digital images. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 17:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1542:_Scheduling_Conflict&amp;diff=96346</id>
		<title>Talk:1542: Scheduling Conflict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1542:_Scheduling_Conflict&amp;diff=96346"/>
				<updated>2015-06-24T22:50:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Answer to question&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What happened to my transcript? I came here, found no page created, put the template up with a transcript and now it's all been overwritten. :P [[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 13:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What happened is that you created the page [[1542]], but that is only mean to be a ''redirect page'' that leads to this page: [[1542: Scheduling Conflict]]. The bot that creates this automatically deleted your transcript when it did it's magic. You can still find you transcript on the 1542 page in the history. (You will have to press the 1542 in the ''(Redirected from 1542)'' at the top of the page to go that page). --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::@Jarod997 -- I think there might have been a scheduling conflict. [[User:Ahem|Ahem]] ([[User talk:Ahem|talk]]) 16:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation, I thought it was more a play on an oxymoron of a bunch of people who are good at fixing scheduling conflicts, only to have a contest in which they're entered be cancelled because of a scheduling conflict. I was going to put this in the explanation (which was blank at the time), but then someone overwrote me - and quite ironically a conflict arose. [[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 13:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Certainly these were my first thoughts.  (Championships must take place after (often regional) qualifying Heats, and those that ascend to the final level then need to make themselves available for the ultimate play-offs.)  It's possibly the inverse (conflict-creation!), but getting through the preliminaries might be like the old joke of losing out on the competition to become Village Idiot to the competitor ''who didn't turn up''!  With ''neither'' of the two sought-after contacts available, either they've not resolved to ensure that at least one of them is contactable at all times, or else they've managed to put aside all other commitments (''including'' the Championships?) to finally get some time together ''with each other''... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.30|141.101.98.30]] 16:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
My original take was similar to that of Jarod997- the cancellation wasn't due to anything the participants did/didn't do, but that the competition itself had a scheduling conflict (like the venue was double-booked or something). [[User:AnInsideJoke|AnInsideJoke]] ([[User talk:AnInsideJoke|talk]]) 18:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)AnInsideJoke&lt;br /&gt;
: Sure but that is just not funny, and it does not explain why nobody could be reached for comment [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 20:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Because they were too embarrassed over their inability to fix the scheduling conflict over the scheduling conflict championships. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 22:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's somethin about the US elections or any debate (we didn't recieve any news here at south, im at Brazil hehehehhehe), but a debate is a national event with conflicts chanpionships and it is scheduled. I recon that is something with the schedule of US elections debate, perhaps it was cancled or just changed. perhaps i was seeing the light reflect on mars and was flashed with the M.I.B. memory flash hehehehehehhehehehehehhe. [[User:Gabrielpenalber|gabrielpenalber]] ([[User User:Gabrielpenalber|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few remarks, but I'll leave it to someone better versed in the English language to work it into the explanation if he/she wishes to:&lt;br /&gt;
  - Is this an American thing, to assume the current world champion must be last year's national champion?&lt;br /&gt;
  - there is a play on words in the title(s), they would be read as &amp;quot;National Scheduling Conflict: Championships canceled&amp;quot; which begs the question &amp;quot;Which championships?&amp;quot;. It is only when reading the NSCC banner that you could assume something like the &amp;quot;National Scheduling Conflict Championships&amp;quot; exists.&lt;br /&gt;
  - How did they get a world champion if the championships are presumably always cancelled? Does that mean the prize is claimed anyway or that the champion is actualy not as good at scheduling conflicts as all those people cancelling because of scheduling conflicts. &lt;br /&gt;
  - Now I'm overthinking, but there is no reason for a spokesperson to be a good at the activity of the organisation he/she is spokesperson for, or is there?&lt;br /&gt;
  -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reminds me a lot of comic #1466: Phone checking. Both are about an obscure championship, and both are interrupted by the nature of said championship. --[[User:Quantanaut|Quantanaut]] ([[User talk:Quantanaut|talk]]) 17:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So (as commented on briefly by an earlier person) I initially read the newspaper headline as National Scheduling Conflict: Championships Cancelled, which is the most obvious reading the way it's stylized, although obviously the picture doesn't make sense in this context. But I think this is intended, that you first read it that way then you look at the picture and go &amp;quot;oh&amp;quot;.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.195|108.162.215.195]] 19:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88458</id>
		<title>Talk:1507: Metaball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88458"/>
				<updated>2015-04-04T22:05:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This... looks amazing! I wonder if this is going to be a case of xkcd influencing real life, like geohashing, the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on speeches or cory doctorow cosplaying... cory doctorow. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.29|173.245.48.29]] 08:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over here in Rightpondia (UK), &amp;quot;Hockey&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Field Hockey&amp;quot; (I'm sure I've never actually heard &amp;quot;ball hockey&amp;quot; as a term before, ''ever'', although must be the same)... although it's mostly popularised as a (often very vicious!) girl's sport; see the St. Trinians cartoons/films.  Although we understand Leftpondians (and especially Upper-Leftpondians) mean Ice Hockey when they miss off the qualifier.  Just as vicious, of course (except now that everyone wears armour... also c.f. usual comments regarding Rugby League/Union vs 'American Football'/Gridiron).  But none of these have anything on the near-variant of these games (mainly in Ireland) that is Hurling..! (As to Field Hockey as Aussie Rules Football is to Association Football?)[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suspiciously similar to Calvinball. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.100|108.162.221.100]] 21:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)A Martin&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree, but there seem to be preset rules (the sheet that Ponytail is holding), suggesting that it isn't made up as they go along [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33|141.101.98.33]] 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see influences of Hofstadter's ''Godel,Escher,Bach'', which has &lt;br /&gt;
1) the idea of how the play-by-play of a football game would be altered if it were baseball (among other counterfactuals), and&lt;br /&gt;
2) the idea of a boardgame whose rules change according to where pieces are on the board.  [[User:Fewmet|Fewmet]] ([[User talk:Fewmet|talk]]) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how the concept of 'out' (as opposed to 'in') would be dealt with as the ball passes into (and eventually out of) the volleyball zone.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.216|173.245.54.216]] 05:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Baseball zone... ;-) Although I'm sure there is a volleyball zone somewhere... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I guess this is not a complaint since the explanation seems to make sense. But I'm still confused about something. In the third panel the invocation of the infield fly rule is entirely wrong, The infielder must either catch and drop the ball or appear to deliberately refuse to catch the ball. The panel shows the ball still in the air when the call is made. As an athletophobe I just spent 20 minutes of my life researching the infield fly rule (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&amp;amp;context=penn_law_review) (!!!) so... well... I get it but how do you make the leap?[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The comic explanation had it wrong. It is Megan (the batter/kicker) who is Out when Ponytail yells. A high ball in Baseball can be called infield fly before anyone even tries to catch it. So it is of no consequence weather Cueball tries to catch it, or actually tries to dunk the ball. I have corrected the explanation acordingly. And also added the fact that the rule is hard to understand to outsiders of baseball. {{unsigned|Kynde}}&lt;br /&gt;
::TY! I've done some thinking and it's starting to dawn on me that the strategy the runners take interacts with the infielders actions. On the plus side this has prompted me to make a new life rule: You should always distinguish between strategy and cheating, but you should never be too picky about it!  :¬D &lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 21:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A quick comment about hockey: there a variation, hockey cosom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_field_hockey). It is played normally indoor and with a ball. But it is also a cheap variant that school in Quebec use in winter in PE, as skating equipment with proper gears for rink hockey is both expensive and require skill that kids might not have. It would better fit with the Metaball title.--[[User:Labreck|Labreck]] ([[User talk:Labreck|talk]]) 10:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem playing golf with a football? Then why anyproblem playing Ice hockey with such a ball? It is easier to get a foot ball into a ice hockey goal than to it into a golf hole. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title reminds me of J H Conway's paradoxical &amp;quot;Metagame&amp;quot;, whose rules are: the first player (L) names a finite game (e.g. Nim), and then the two players (L and R) play that game. Is Metagame a finite game? If it is, then each player in turn can name Metagame, and the process never ends, so it isn't finite. But if it isn't finite, L must name another finite game, so the game does end. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.216|141.101.98.216]] 10:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reminds me of Hich-Hiker's &amp;quot;Brockian_Ultra-Cricket&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Brockian_Ultra-Cricket|title=Brockian Ultra-Cricket - Hitchhikers|accessdate=2015-04-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Rule Four: Throw lots of assorted items of sporting equipment over the wall for the players. Anything will do – cricket bats, basecube bats, tennis guns, skis, anything you can get a good swing with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Five: The players should now lay about themselves for all they are worth with whatever they find to hand. Whenever a player scores a “hit” on another player, he should immediately run away as fast as he can and apologize from a safe distance. Apologies should be concise, sincere, and, for maximum clarity and points, delivered through a megaphone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Six: The winning team shall be the first team that wins.&amp;quot;'' [[User:Briantist|Briantist]] ([[User talk:Briantist|talk]]) 13:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Who is the female with her hair in a bun?--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 14:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not anyone in particular but she was also in [[1504]] and I have found 7 appereance of [[Hair Bun Girl]] with hair in a bun. So I have added her as a minor character. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88457</id>
		<title>Talk:1507: Metaball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88457"/>
				<updated>2015-04-04T22:03:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This... looks amazing! I wonder if this is going to be a case of xkcd influencing real life, like geohashing, the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on speeches or cory doctorow cosplaying... cory doctorow. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.29|173.245.48.29]] 08:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over here in Rightpondia (UK), &amp;quot;Hockey&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Field Hockey&amp;quot; (I'm sure I've never actually heard &amp;quot;ball hockey&amp;quot; as a term before, ''ever'', although must be the same)... although it's mostly popularised as a (often very vicious!) girl's sport; see the St. Trinians cartoons/films.  Although we understand Leftpondians (and especially Upper-Leftpondians) mean Ice Hockey when they miss off the qualifier.  Just as vicious, of course (except now that everyone wears armour... also c.f. usual comments regarding Rugby League/Union vs 'American Football'/Gridiron).  But none of these have anything on the near-variant of these games (mainly in Ireland) that is Hurling..! (As to Field Hockey as Aussie Rules Football is to Association Football?)[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suspiciously similar to Calvinball. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.100|108.162.221.100]] 21:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)A Martin&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree, but there seem to be preset rules (the sheet that Ponytail is holding), suggesting that it isn't made up as they go along [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33|141.101.98.33]] 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see influences of Hofstadter's ''Godel,Escher,Bach'', which has &lt;br /&gt;
1) the idea of how the play-by-play of a football game would be altered if it were baseball (among other counterfactuals), and&lt;br /&gt;
2) the idea of a boardgame whose rules change according to where pieces are on the board.  [[User:Fewmet|Fewmet]] ([[User talk:Fewmet|talk]]) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how the concept of 'out' (as opposed to 'in') would be dealt with as the ball passes into (and eventually out of) the volleyball zone.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.216|173.245.54.216]] 05:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Baseball zone... ;-) Although I'm sure there is a volleyball zone somewhere... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I guess this is not a complaint since the explanation seems to make sense. But I'm still confused about something. In the third panel the invocation of the infield fly rule is entirely wrong, The infielder must either catch and drop the ball or appear to deliberately refuse to catch the ball. The panel shows the ball still in the air when the call is made. As an athletophobe I just spent 20 minutes of my life researching the infield fly rule (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&amp;amp;context=penn_law_review) (!!!) so... well... I get it but how do you make the leap?[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The comic explanation had it wrong. It is Megan (the batter/kicker) who is Out when Ponytail yells. A high ball in Baseball can be called infield fly before anyone even tries to catch it. So it is of no consequence weather Cueball tries to catch it, or actually tries to dunk the ball. I have corrected the explanation acordingly. And also added the fact that the rule is hard to understand to outsiders of baseball. {{unsigned|Kynde}}&lt;br /&gt;
::TY! I've done some thinking and it's starting to dawn on me that the strategy the runners take interact with the infielder's actions. On the plus side this have prompted me to make a new life rule: You should always distinguish between strategy and cheating, but you should never be too picky about it!  :¬D &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 21:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A quick comment about hockey: there a variation, hockey cosom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_field_hockey). It is played normally indoor and with a ball. But it is also a cheap variant that school in Quebec use in winter in PE, as skating equipment with proper gears for rink hockey is both expensive and require skill that kids might not have. It would better fit with the Metaball title.--[[User:Labreck|Labreck]] ([[User talk:Labreck|talk]]) 10:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem playing golf with a football? Then why anyproblem playing Ice hockey with such a ball? It is easier to get a foot ball into a ice hockey goal than to it into a golf hole. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title reminds me of J H Conway's paradoxical &amp;quot;Metagame&amp;quot;, whose rules are: the first player (L) names a finite game (e.g. Nim), and then the two players (L and R) play that game. Is Metagame a finite game? If it is, then each player in turn can name Metagame, and the process never ends, so it isn't finite. But if it isn't finite, L must name another finite game, so the game does end. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.216|141.101.98.216]] 10:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reminds me of Hich-Hiker's &amp;quot;Brockian_Ultra-Cricket&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Brockian_Ultra-Cricket|title=Brockian Ultra-Cricket - Hitchhikers|accessdate=2015-04-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Rule Four: Throw lots of assorted items of sporting equipment over the wall for the players. Anything will do – cricket bats, basecube bats, tennis guns, skis, anything you can get a good swing with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Five: The players should now lay about themselves for all they are worth with whatever they find to hand. Whenever a player scores a “hit” on another player, he should immediately run away as fast as he can and apologize from a safe distance. Apologies should be concise, sincere, and, for maximum clarity and points, delivered through a megaphone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Six: The winning team shall be the first team that wins.&amp;quot;'' [[User:Briantist|Briantist]] ([[User talk:Briantist|talk]]) 13:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Who is the female with her hair in a bun?--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 14:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not anyone in particular but she was also in [[1504]] and I have found 7 appereance of [[Hair Bun Girl]] with hair in a bun. So I have added her as a minor character. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88456</id>
		<title>Talk:1507: Metaball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88456"/>
				<updated>2015-04-04T21:59:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: responding to a comment to me about my prior comment and question&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This... looks amazing! I wonder if this is going to be a case of xkcd influencing real life, like geohashing, the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on speeches or cory doctorow cosplaying... cory doctorow. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.29|173.245.48.29]] 08:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over here in Rightpondia (UK), &amp;quot;Hockey&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Field Hockey&amp;quot; (I'm sure I've never actually heard &amp;quot;ball hockey&amp;quot; as a term before, ''ever'', although must be the same)... although it's mostly popularised as a (often very vicious!) girl's sport; see the St. Trinians cartoons/films.  Although we understand Leftpondians (and especially Upper-Leftpondians) mean Ice Hockey when they miss off the qualifier.  Just as vicious, of course (except now that everyone wears armour... also c.f. usual comments regarding Rugby League/Union vs 'American Football'/Gridiron).  But none of these have anything on the near-variant of these games (mainly in Ireland) that is Hurling..! (As to Field Hockey as Aussie Rules Football is to Association Football?)[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suspiciously similar to Calvinball. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.100|108.162.221.100]] 21:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)A Martin&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree, but there seem to be preset rules (the sheet that Ponytail is holding), suggesting that it isn't made up as they go along [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33|141.101.98.33]] 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see influences of Hofstadter's ''Godel,Escher,Bach'', which has &lt;br /&gt;
1) the idea of how the play-by-play of a football game would be altered if it were baseball (among other counterfactuals), and&lt;br /&gt;
2) the idea of a boardgame whose rules change according to where pieces are on the board.  [[User:Fewmet|Fewmet]] ([[User talk:Fewmet|talk]]) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how the concept of 'out' (as opposed to 'in') would be dealt with as the ball passes into (and eventually out of) the volleyball zone.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.216|173.245.54.216]] 05:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Baseball zone... ;-) Although I'm sure there is a volleyball zone somewhere... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I guess this is not a complaint since the explanation seems to make sense. But I'm still confused about something. In the third panel the invocation of the infield fly rule is entirely wrong, The infielder must either catch and drop the ball or appear to deliberately refuse to catch the ball. The panel shows the ball still in the air when the call is made. As an athletophobe I just spent 20 minutes of my life researching the infield fly rule (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&amp;amp;context=penn_law_review) (!!!) so... well... I get it but how do you make the leap?[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The comic explanation had it wrong. It is Megan (the batter/kicker) who is Out when Ponytail yells. A high ball in Baseball can be called infield fly before anyone even tries to catch it. So it is of no consequence weather Cueball tries to catch it, or actually tries to dunk the ball. I have corrected the explanation acordingly. And also added the fact that the rule is hard to understand to outsiders of baseball. {{unsigned|Kynde}}&lt;br /&gt;
::TY! I've done some thinking and it's starting to dawn on me that the strategy the runners take interact with the infielder's actions. On the plus side this have prompted me to make a new life rule: You should always distinguish between strategy and cheating, but you should never be too picky about it!  :¬D &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 21:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
A quick comment about hockey: there a variation, hockey cosom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoor_field_hockey). It is played normally indoor and with a ball. But it is also a cheap variant that school in Quebec use in winter in PE, as skating equipment with proper gears for rink hockey is both expensive and require skill that kids might not have. It would better fit with the Metaball title.--[[User:Labreck|Labreck]] ([[User talk:Labreck|talk]]) 10:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem playing golf with a football? Then why anyproblem playing Ice hockey with such a ball? It is easier to get a foot ball into a ice hockey goal than to it into a golf hole. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title reminds me of J H Conway's paradoxical &amp;quot;Metagame&amp;quot;, whose rules are: the first player (L) names a finite game (e.g. Nim), and then the two players (L and R) play that game. Is Metagame a finite game? If it is, then each player in turn can name Metagame, and the process never ends, so it isn't finite. But if it isn't finite, L must name another finite game, so the game does end. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.216|141.101.98.216]] 10:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reminds me of Hich-Hiker's &amp;quot;Brockian_Ultra-Cricket&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Brockian_Ultra-Cricket|title=Brockian Ultra-Cricket - Hitchhikers|accessdate=2015-04-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Rule Four: Throw lots of assorted items of sporting equipment over the wall for the players. Anything will do – cricket bats, basecube bats, tennis guns, skis, anything you can get a good swing with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Five: The players should now lay about themselves for all they are worth with whatever they find to hand. Whenever a player scores a “hit” on another player, he should immediately run away as fast as he can and apologize from a safe distance. Apologies should be concise, sincere, and, for maximum clarity and points, delivered through a megaphone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rule Six: The winning team shall be the first team that wins.&amp;quot;'' [[User:Briantist|Briantist]] ([[User talk:Briantist|talk]]) 13:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Who is the female with her hair in a bun?--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 14:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not anyone in particular but she was also in [[1504]] and I have found 7 appereance of [[Hair Bun Girl]] with hair in a bun. So I have added her as a minor character. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88339</id>
		<title>Talk:1507: Metaball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88339"/>
				<updated>2015-04-04T09:05:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: question of interpretation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This... looks amazing! I wonder if this is going to be a case of xkcd influencing real life, like geohashing, the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on speeches or cory doctorow cosplaying... cory doctorow. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.29|173.245.48.29]] 08:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over here in Rightpondia (UK), &amp;quot;Hockey&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Field Hockey&amp;quot; (I'm sure I've never actually heard &amp;quot;ball hockey&amp;quot; as a term before, ''ever'', although must be the same)... although it's mostly popularised as a (often very vicious!) girl's sport; see the St. Trinians cartoons/films.  Although we understand Leftpondians (and especially Upper-Leftpondians) mean Ice Hockey when they miss off the qualifier.  Just as vicious, of course (except now that everyone wears armour... also c.f. usual comments regarding Rugby League/Union vs 'American Football'/Gridiron).  But none of these have anything on the near-variant of these games (mainly in Ireland) that is Hurling..! (As to Field Hockey as Aussie Rules Football is to Association Football?)[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suspiciously similar to Calvinball. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.100|108.162.221.100]] 21:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)A Martin&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree, but there seem to be preset rules (the sheet that Ponytail is holding), suggesting that it isn't made up as they go along [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33|141.101.98.33]] 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see influences of Hofstadter's ''Godel,Escher,Bach'', which has &lt;br /&gt;
1) the idea of how the play-by-play of a football game would be altered if it were baseball (among other counterfactuals), and&lt;br /&gt;
2) the idea of a boardgame whose rules change according to where pieces are on the board.  [[User:Fewmet|Fewmet]] ([[User talk:Fewmet|talk]]) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how the concept of 'out' (as opposed to 'in') would be dealt with as the ball passes into (and eventually out of) the volleyball zone.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.216|173.245.54.216]] 05:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I guess this is not a complaint since the explanation seems to make sense. But I'm still confused about something. In the third panel the invocation of the infield fly rule is entirely wrong, The infielder must either catch and drop the ball or appear to deliberately refuse to catch the ball. The panel shows the ball still in the air when the call is made. As an athletophobe I just spent 20 minutes of my life researching the infield fly rule (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&amp;amp;context=penn_law_review) (!!!) so... well... I get it but how do you make the leap?[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88337</id>
		<title>Talk:1507: Metaball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1507:_Metaball&amp;diff=88337"/>
				<updated>2015-04-04T09:01:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: question of interpretation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This... looks amazing! I wonder if this is going to be a case of xkcd influencing real life, like geohashing, the &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; on speeches or cory doctorow cosplaying... cory doctorow. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.29|173.245.48.29]] 08:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over here in Rightpondia (UK), &amp;quot;Hockey&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Field Hockey&amp;quot; (I'm sure I've never actually heard &amp;quot;ball hockey&amp;quot; as a term before, ''ever'', although must be the same)... although it's mostly popularised as a (often very vicious!) girl's sport; see the St. Trinians cartoons/films.  Although we understand Leftpondians (and especially Upper-Leftpondians) mean Ice Hockey when they miss off the qualifier.  Just as vicious, of course (except now that everyone wears armour... also c.f. usual comments regarding Rugby League/Union vs 'American Football'/Gridiron).  But none of these have anything on the near-variant of these games (mainly in Ireland) that is Hurling..! (As to Field Hockey as Aussie Rules Football is to Association Football?)[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 16:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suspiciously similar to Calvinball. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.100|108.162.221.100]] 21:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)A Martin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see influences of Hofstadter's ''Godel,Escher,Bach'', which has &lt;br /&gt;
1) the idea of how the play-by-play of a football game would be altered if it were baseball (among other counterfactuals), and&lt;br /&gt;
2) the idea of a boardgame whose rules change according to where pieces are on the board.  [[User:Fewmet|Fewmet]] ([[User talk:Fewmet|talk]]) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder how the concept of 'out' (as opposed to 'in') would be dealt with as the ball passes into (and eventually out of) the volleyball zone.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.216|173.245.54.216]] 05:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK I guess this is not a complaint since the explanation seems to make sense. But I'm still confused about something. In the third panel the invocation of the infield fly rule is entirely wrong, The infielder must either catch and drop the ball or appear to deliberately refuse to catch the ball. The panel shows the ball still in the air when the call is made. As an athletophobe I just spent 20 minutes of my life researching the infield fly rule (http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5322&amp;amp;context=penn_law_review(!)) so... well... I get it but how do you make the leap?[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 09:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1492:_Dress_Color&amp;diff=85364</id>
		<title>Talk:1492: Dress Color</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1492:_Dress_Color&amp;diff=85364"/>
				<updated>2015-02-28T02:44:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: new comment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;To me, they both look blue/gold [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To me as well.  The one on the right, with a lighter background, appears more bluish and the collar is a darker brown.  (The collar on the left, to my eyes, matches the face on the right.)  But both definitely appear bluish with a dull yellow. - Equinox [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.120|199.27.128.120]] 16:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the illusion supposed to be? The colors of the dress look a bit darker with the light background, but not very much. Is that the illusion? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.82|141.101.80.82]] 07:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Agree. To me, it looks like it's definitely light blue (maybe &amp;quot;cornflower&amp;quot;?) with pale olive stripes.  &amp;quot;Gold&amp;quot; would really be a stretch.  It looks like that in all lighting conditions and in both backgrounds of the strip.  Did I pass some kind of color-blindness test? Or fail? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.133|108.162.254.133]] 07:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: This has nothing to do with color-blindness, but probably with certain arbitrary constants related to white-balance adjustment that differ brain-to-brain. Many people I know insist that even though the picture looks blue, it's a dress illuminated by a blue light, and based on this assumption their brain may essentially redden the whole picture to adjust for this light. The actual picture was taken in white light, not blue light. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.28|173.245.55.28]] 07:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It may also be related to white-balance of the MONITOR. I see original dress like black and blue and the one on left here as gold and light blue. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently for some people the left-hand-side's general blueishness is adjusted against by the visual system enough to make the dress look white and gold instead of blue and brown. I am not one of those people. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.28|173.245.55.28]] 07:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Description says left for both [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.219|141.101.98.219]] 08:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Now changed. (Saw it myself before I saw your comment, and just lept straight in there. Hopefully I changed the right left so that it's right and not left the wrong left whilst producing the wrong right. Alright?) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.192|141.101.98.192]] 09:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC) (Also, &amp;quot;hello near-IP neighbour!&amp;quot;... The same digits, even.  Creepy.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Y'all are both from London, and probably live on the same street. Congrats! You made a friend! :) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.192|108.162.216.192]] 16:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are they really the same colour? 'Cause to me on the blue side it looks blue and black- while on the white side it looks white and gold. Is this normal? {{unsigned|FlyingPiggy}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figure on the right definitely has a beard. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 09:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I checked with ColorZilla and the RGB values are identical. From my perspective, in the one on the left the dress appears pale blue with darker brown/gold stripes, and the one on the right appears a darker blue with lighter brown/gold stripes. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.63|141.101.98.63]] 10:10, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is just a polychromatic version of that checker shadow illusion, right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_shadow_illusion [[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.38|108.162.231.38]] 10:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I thought too. But it looks the same (doesn't it?) and is the same (that, thankfully is non-subjective and verifiable with as little as MSPaint), so I'm at loss as to why this deserves a comic. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.136|141.101.104.136]] 10:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: This is a common optical illusion (at least I've seen this many times) - most peoples eyes perform a white balance adjustment automatically which affects the perceived colours.  If your eyes don't do this then you will do well in the paint colour matching business.  http://www.moillusions.com/hue-optical-illusion/  I apologise for the jarring colours in the link. {{unsigned ip|141.101.98.220}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's a particularly good demonstration of the underlying &amp;quot;color perception&amp;quot; illusion (i.e. the Checker-Shadow illusion referred to above): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Sen1HTu5o [[User:Arcanechili|Arcanechili]] ([[User talk:Arcanechili|talk]]) 15:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is a reference to the debate around the coloration of [http://amd.c.yimg.jp/amd/20150227-00000070-zdn_n-000-2-view.jpg this dress]. The band in the middle of the image shows some of the material of the dress.  To some people, including me, the dress is obviously, unquestionably black and blue. But to others, including my wife, it's obviously, unquestionably, black and gold. {{unsigned ip|103.22.200.196}}&lt;br /&gt;
:And to others it's apparently a number of other combinations - I've seen claims of white/gold and blue/orange. However, surprisingly few people seem to have seen [http://www.romanoriginals.co.uk/invt/70931?colour=Royal-Blue this link] to the manufacturer's page for what appears to be the same dress; available in 4 colour combinations which according to the manufacturers' descriptions are ivory/black, scarlet/black, pink/black and royal-blue/black, with pictures available of all versions. As such I'm happy to accept the pictures doing the rounds are probably the blue/black variant (although most of the over-exposed versions I've seen appear light-blue/goldish-brown to me. {{unsigned ip|141.101.99.77}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our eyes are too efficient, which makes this illusion work.  In dim light we dilate our eyes, so an enclosed room with one lamp seems bright, though it is a cave compared to the outdoors.  If the bulb in our lamp is of a warm tone, our eyes adjust so we believe we see colours as though in daylight.  I think that's what's happening in the dress illusion -- we are trying to allow for perceived lighting conditions in the photo -- so the actual illusion is in our guess as to what those light conditions actually are.  And finally an artist quote:  &amp;quot;I can paint you the skin of Venus with mud, provided you let me surround it as I will.&amp;quot;  - Eugene Delacroix [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.84|108.162.242.84]] 13:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Notes on camera color correction: it's worse than, and is not just an optical illusion. It's a camera screwup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://40.media.tumblr.com/a391a1b4b46dd6b498d379e50f96ecbc/tumblr_nkcjuq8Tdr1tnacy1o1_500.jpg Here is the original photo] as [http://swiked.tumblr.com/post/112159166305/katze-geht-meow-ijustloveyoutubers seen here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://media.tumblr.com/ec387ec0bb03230268a9e905d74097d9/tumblr_inline_nkeezsjAuH1svicb3.jpg Here is a second photo of the same dress in normal light] As [http://swiked.tumblr.com/post/112164479015/can-we-have-more-pictures-of-the-dress-please-we seen here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.romanoriginals.co.uk/invt/70931?colour=Royal-Blue Here is the online store where you can buy the dress]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.romanoriginals.co.uk/content/ebiz/romanoriginals/invt/70931/70931rbl_zoom1.jpg Here is a high quality photo of the dress from the store]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://imgur.com/RY2dTnW.jpg Here is an example of the color &amp;quot;correction&amp;quot; that happens when you calibrate things so that Dark Blue = White.] NOTE: This is a major readjustment of colors and there is no real color matching between the two images. White is not actually blue in this image, and up is not down, and you are not going crazy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheap cameras will try to adjust colors based on formulas that guess what the correct color scheme is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you take a photo while in the shade on a sunny day, you likely get most of your light from the bright *BLUE* sky. This can make you look awful. The camera is set up to guess the correct exposure.  In this case the camera follows the rules, and guesses, wrongly, that the the overall majority color in the center of the photo is white, and transforms the rest of the colors to match&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a camera screwup. It also depends on how bad your viewing device is behaving, because, based on how dark the screen is, you then get the optical illusion effect that Randall posted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a secondary effect, and not the real reason why behind what is going on in the first place. The correct rendering of the camera screwup is going to be, on most devices with normal color rendition, white with gold. Because some monitors are lighter or darker depending on viewing angle, this also impacts color perception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can then get the actual optical illusion after all that. But as we have seen with good photos of the actual dress in normal light, the camera got it wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TL;DR: It's a cell phone camera screwup. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.170|173.245.52.170]] 14:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)ruary 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible that there's a connection between this comic and [[690: Semicontrolled Demolition]]? Some discussions I've seen about this topic involve the choice between white/gold and blue/black, so Randall coloured his dress gold/blue. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.122|108.162.216.122]] 16:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's more likely due to the fact that the colors of the actual picture - that is, if you use a color picker - are roughly the same as those in the comic.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.111|108.162.216.111]] 17:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm reminded of [[356: Nerd Sniping]], only the perpetrator has managed to snipe the entire interwebs {{unsigned ip|141.101.106.107}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one has yet mentioned that ignoring color, the two images are also mirror images of each other.  On the left, the figure is looking slightly toward her own right shoulder; while on the right she is looking slightly to her own left.  Most likely not at all relevant to this discussion, but usually folks on this forum are very quick to point out even insignificant details (like I'm doing right now)  :) &lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.42|108.162.216.42]] 19:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Similar Illusions and explanation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel like this line seems out o place, or at least badly worded (using half the URL as the text...):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Similar types of illusions can be seen at Optical illusion#Color_and_brightness_constancies and at echalk. (requires Flash®player).&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, this seems similar to the [http://web.mit.edu/persci/people/adelson/checkershadow_illusion.html checker shadow illusion] (link to page on website with explanation of said illusion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On another note, this page seems rather disorganized and uniformative about the phenomenon behind this illusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Zweisteine|Zweisteine]] ([[User talk:Zweisteine|talk]]) 19:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This explanation is lacking in a particular detail: in Randall's drawing, what colors do the dresses look. I'm color blind, so they don't look different to me, but I couldn't name them. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.173|173.245.52.173]] 00:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess it depends. For ME it is blue and gold. --[[User:DaB.|DaB.]] ([[User talk:DaB.|talk]]) 01:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOOK, Randall.  Schrödinger was a crossdresser.  This was Schrödinger's dress.  My Schrödinger fanfics say so and you can't take away my dreams!  [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.107|173.245.50.107]] 02:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow. This is amazing. Starting out, I see only blue and gold in both sides of the comic, the photo strip down the center, and the photo it's based on. I see only slight differences in color among all these images. Just variations in brightness. Has anyone else noticed that the colors Randall has chosen are almost precisely complementary? Adding the R, G, and B values from each color cited in the explanation gets you 248 R, 248 G, and 247 B. The values in the center strip vary alot but I have found examples of each color that match within 2 bits in an 8 bit RGB system. I wonder how and why Randall chose these values. NewScientist has an article on this too. Trivia, re Monty Hall discussion: In the 60's muscle car era the Pontiac GTO was nicknamed &amp;quot;The Goat&amp;quot; so maybe the car IS the goat! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 02:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84740</id>
		<title>Talk:1488: Flowcharts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84740"/>
				<updated>2015-02-18T23:47:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A little bit more of 730? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.108|141.101.80.108]] 06:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:More along the lines of 94, 210, 518, 627, 844, 845, and 1195, though I see similarities with 730. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
How should we do the transcript? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   You could do the transcript as a number list formatted like: &amp;quot;[Title of item] IF YES(GOTO X), IF NO(GOTO Y)&amp;quot; (where &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot; are the numbers on the list for the corresponding next option). Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to say that I find some of the linked spiral-images ''very'' disturbing. Although for some they'd be the same even ''without'' the spirals, admitedly. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 09:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this will end up being one of the most challenging explanations yet (of those that are completely explicable) - got quite a task up ahead... -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 10:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally (for a flowchart) the Start symbol should not have an input. The electrical circuit is not a rectifier! Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.103|108.162.254.103]] 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the newly corrected version, it is. [[User:Knob creek|Knob creek]] ([[User talk:Knob creek|talk]]) 16:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it doesn't need to be, since the rectification is done by the flow chart. Two of the diodes will never be used. (Is it still a rectifier if it's not rectifying?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes it's still a rectifier. It just appears to be out of a job, that's all. Anyone else notice that the bridge rectifier IS a flowchart? The two decision trees feeding it are completely unnecessary. Getting rid of them gives the rectifier back it's job! Also, to give Randall a break, the original diagram of the bridge is actually a ring modulator. It's been decades since I've been in RF so I had to track it down and confirm.[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
OCD comment: There appear to be two lines missing, 1) from scatter plots to data or axis, 2) from the bottom of positive or negative DC terminal to the negative terminal of the battery.  Also, I would be happier if the two left hand diodes of the full wave rectifier were reversed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scatter plots don't have lines, that's the joke. {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.71}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either I was really tired this morning, or the spiral was not actually present in the first version of this comic.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.98|108.162.254.98]] 13:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like the options for the &amp;quot;Do you like flowcharts?&amp;quot; box should be reversed (only putting someone through the flowchart if they say they like flowcharts). I think it makes less sense to have the first option &amp;quot;annoy&amp;quot; someone with a flowchart option until they say they don't like flowcharts, then put them through a flowchart. Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no evidence that the &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; box is asking you to &amp;quot;choose whichever you value more&amp;quot;. The graph shows your happiness as a function of time, not &amp;quot;your time&amp;quot; (it's not as if you were asked to choose between, say, more happiness or more spare time for yourself). I think it is just asking you to choose which axis of the graph you want to follow. The flowchart for the line graph and the scatter plot are similar; since &amp;quot;X or Y&amp;quot; is not interpreted as a question about value, why should &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; be?&lt;br /&gt;
 Zetfr 14:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment on the Fibonacci and Golden Spirals being the same is not correct.  According to Wikipedia{{w|Golden_Spiral|[1]}}{{w|Fibonacci_number|[2]}}: &amp;quot;A Fibonacci spiral '''approximates''' the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side.&amp;quot; - [[User:Prometheusmmiv|Prometheusmmiv]] ([[User talk:Prometheusmmiv|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has uploaded a new version, it fixes some missing lines: The scatter graph is now connected, as is the DC terminal, and the battery is now in a circuit. Some of the explaination above needs updating [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.47|141.101.99.47]] 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on the image takes you to http://xkcd.com/spiral/ {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch about  http://xkcd.com/spiral/ ! --[[User:Guest|Guest]] ([[User talk:Guest|talk]]) 17:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''NOTE''' this comic has been changed, oddly. http://xkcd.com/1488/ [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we change this wiki to have the updated image?  The XKCD site is updated, but this page still shows the old image. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have uploaded the correct version now. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The image is still out of date as it lacks the Yes / Never! markings on the Path of Least Resistance decision box. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.174|173.245.54.174]] 21:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a coincidence that a Fibonacci sequence has a link to the golden ratio? I think not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08 [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow - I tried the random button once and got to this comic: [[1359: Phone Alarm]]. For a second I thought he had rigged it - but that is was not the case. But that was not getting to something else ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84739</id>
		<title>Talk:1488: Flowcharts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84739"/>
				<updated>2015-02-18T23:34:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A little bit more of 730? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.108|141.101.80.108]] 06:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:More along the lines of 94, 210, 518, 627, 844, 845, and 1195, though I see similarities with 730. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
How should we do the transcript? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   You could do the transcript as a number list formatted like: &amp;quot;[Title of item] IF YES(GOTO X), IF NO(GOTO Y)&amp;quot; (where &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot; are the numbers on the list for the corresponding next option). Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to say that I find some of the linked spiral-images ''very'' disturbing. Although for some they'd be the same even ''without'' the spirals, admitedly. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 09:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this will end up being one of the most challenging explanations yet (of those that are completely explicable) - got quite a task up ahead... -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 10:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally (for a flowchart) the Start symbol should not have an input. The electrical circuit is not a rectifier! Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.103|108.162.254.103]] 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the newly corrected version, it is. [[User:Knob creek|Knob creek]] ([[User talk:Knob creek|talk]]) 16:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it doesn't need to be, since the rectification is done by the flow chart. Two of the diodes will never be used. (Is it still a rectifier if it's not rectifying?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes it's still a rectifier. It just appears to be out of a job, that's all. Anyone else notice that the bridge rectifier IS a flowchart? The two decision trees feeding it are completely unnecessary. Getting rid of them gives the rectifier back it's job![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
OCD comment: There appear to be two lines missing, 1) from scatter plots to data or axis, 2) from the bottom of positive or negative DC terminal to the negative terminal of the battery.  Also, I would be happier if the two left hand diodes of the full wave rectifier were reversed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scatter plots don't have lines, that's the joke. {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.71}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either I was really tired this morning, or the spiral was not actually present in the first version of this comic.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.98|108.162.254.98]] 13:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like the options for the &amp;quot;Do you like flowcharts?&amp;quot; box should be reversed (only putting someone through the flowchart if they say they like flowcharts). I think it makes less sense to have the first option &amp;quot;annoy&amp;quot; someone with a flowchart option until they say they don't like flowcharts, then put them through a flowchart. Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no evidence that the &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; box is asking you to &amp;quot;choose whichever you value more&amp;quot;. The graph shows your happiness as a function of time, not &amp;quot;your time&amp;quot; (it's not as if you were asked to choose between, say, more happiness or more spare time for yourself). I think it is just asking you to choose which axis of the graph you want to follow. The flowchart for the line graph and the scatter plot are similar; since &amp;quot;X or Y&amp;quot; is not interpreted as a question about value, why should &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; be?&lt;br /&gt;
 Zetfr 14:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment on the Fibonacci and Golden Spirals being the same is not correct.  According to Wikipedia{{w|Golden_Spiral|[1]}}{{w|Fibonacci_number|[2]}}: &amp;quot;A Fibonacci spiral '''approximates''' the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side.&amp;quot; - [[User:Prometheusmmiv|Prometheusmmiv]] ([[User talk:Prometheusmmiv|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has uploaded a new version, it fixes some missing lines: The scatter graph is now connected, as is the DC terminal, and the battery is now in a circuit. Some of the explaination above needs updating [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.47|141.101.99.47]] 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on the image takes you to http://xkcd.com/spiral/ {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch about  http://xkcd.com/spiral/ ! --[[User:Guest|Guest]] ([[User talk:Guest|talk]]) 17:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''NOTE''' this comic has been changed, oddly. http://xkcd.com/1488/ [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we change this wiki to have the updated image?  The XKCD site is updated, but this page still shows the old image. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have uploaded the correct version now. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The image is still out of date as it lacks the Yes / Never! markings on the Path of Least Resistance decision box. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.174|173.245.54.174]] 21:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a coincidence that a Fibonacci sequence has a link to the golden ratio? I think not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08 [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow - I tried the random button once and got to this comic: [[1359: Phone Alarm]]. For a second I thought he had rigged it - but that is was not the case. But that was not getting to something else ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84738</id>
		<title>Talk:1488: Flowcharts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84738"/>
				<updated>2015-02-18T23:29:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A little bit more of 730? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.108|141.101.80.108]] 06:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:More along the lines of 94, 210, 518, 627, 844, 845, and 1195, though I see similarities with 730. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
How should we do the transcript? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   You could do the transcript as a number list formatted like: &amp;quot;[Title of item] IF YES(GOTO X), IF NO(GOTO Y)&amp;quot; (where &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot; are the numbers on the list for the corresponding next option). Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to say that I find some of the linked spiral-images ''very'' disturbing. Although for some they'd be the same even ''without'' the spirals, admitedly. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 09:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this will end up being one of the most challenging explanations yet (of those that are completely explicable) - got quite a task up ahead... -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 10:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally (for a flowchart) the Start symbol should not have an input. The electrical circuit is not a rectifier! Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.103|108.162.254.103]] 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the newly corrected version, it is. [[User:Knob creek|Knob creek]] ([[User talk:Knob creek|talk]]) 16:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it doesn't need to be, since the rectification is done by the flow chart. Two of the diodes will never be used. (Is it still a rectifier if it's not rectifying?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes it's still a rectifier. It just appears to be out of a job, that's all. Anyone else notice that the bridge rectifier IS a flowchart? The two decision trees feeding it are completely unnecessary![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
OCD comment: There appear to be two lines missing, 1) from scatter plots to data or axis, 2) from the bottom of positive or negative DC terminal to the negative terminal of the battery.  Also, I would be happier if the two left hand diodes of the full wave rectifier were reversed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scatter plots don't have lines, that's the joke. {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.71}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either I was really tired this morning, or the spiral was not actually present in the first version of this comic.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.98|108.162.254.98]] 13:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like the options for the &amp;quot;Do you like flowcharts?&amp;quot; box should be reversed (only putting someone through the flowchart if they say they like flowcharts). I think it makes less sense to have the first option &amp;quot;annoy&amp;quot; someone with a flowchart option until they say they don't like flowcharts, then put them through a flowchart. Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no evidence that the &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; box is asking you to &amp;quot;choose whichever you value more&amp;quot;. The graph shows your happiness as a function of time, not &amp;quot;your time&amp;quot; (it's not as if you were asked to choose between, say, more happiness or more spare time for yourself). I think it is just asking you to choose which axis of the graph you want to follow. The flowchart for the line graph and the scatter plot are similar; since &amp;quot;X or Y&amp;quot; is not interpreted as a question about value, why should &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; be?&lt;br /&gt;
 Zetfr 14:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment on the Fibonacci and Golden Spirals being the same is not correct.  According to Wikipedia{{w|Golden_Spiral|[1]}}{{w|Fibonacci_number|[2]}}: &amp;quot;A Fibonacci spiral '''approximates''' the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side.&amp;quot; - [[User:Prometheusmmiv|Prometheusmmiv]] ([[User talk:Prometheusmmiv|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has uploaded a new version, it fixes some missing lines: The scatter graph is now connected, as is the DC terminal, and the battery is now in a circuit. Some of the explaination above needs updating [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.47|141.101.99.47]] 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on the image takes you to http://xkcd.com/spiral/ {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch about  http://xkcd.com/spiral/ ! --[[User:Guest|Guest]] ([[User talk:Guest|talk]]) 17:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''NOTE''' this comic has been changed, oddly. http://xkcd.com/1488/ [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we change this wiki to have the updated image?  The XKCD site is updated, but this page still shows the old image. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have uploaded the correct version now. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The image is still out of date as it lacks the Yes / Never! markings on the Path of Least Resistance decision box. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.174|173.245.54.174]] 21:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a coincidence that a Fibonacci sequence has a link to the golden ratio? I think not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08 [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow - I tried the random button once and got to this comic: [[1359: Phone Alarm]]. For a second I thought he had rigged it - but that is was not the case. But that was not getting to something else ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84737</id>
		<title>Talk:1488: Flowcharts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84737"/>
				<updated>2015-02-18T23:24:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A little bit more of 730? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.108|141.101.80.108]] 06:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:More along the lines of 94, 210, 518, 627, 844, 845, and 1195, though I see similarities with 730. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
How should we do the transcript? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   You could do the transcript as a number list formatted like: &amp;quot;[Title of item] IF YES(GOTO X), IF NO(GOTO Y)&amp;quot; (where &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot; are the numbers on the list for the corresponding next option). Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to say that I find some of the linked spiral-images ''very'' disturbing. Although for some they'd be the same even ''without'' the spirals, admitedly. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 09:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this will end up being one of the most challenging explanations yet (of those that are completely explicable) - got quite a task up ahead... -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 10:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally (for a flowchart) the Start symbol should not have an input. The electrical circuit is not a rectifier! Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.103|108.162.254.103]] 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the newly corrected version, it is. [[User:Knob creek|Knob creek]] ([[User talk:Knob creek|talk]]) 16:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it doesn't need to be, since the rectification is done by the flow chart. Two of the diodes will never be used. (Is it still a rectifier if it's not rectifying?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes it's still a rectifier. It just appears to be out of a job, that's all. Anyone else notice that the bridge rectifier IS a flowchart?![[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 23:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
OCD comment: There appear to be two lines missing, 1) from scatter plots to data or axis, 2) from the bottom of positive or negative DC terminal to the negative terminal of the battery.  Also, I would be happier if the two left hand diodes of the full wave rectifier were reversed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scatter plots don't have lines, that's the joke. {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.71}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either I was really tired this morning, or the spiral was not actually present in the first version of this comic.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.98|108.162.254.98]] 13:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like the options for the &amp;quot;Do you like flowcharts?&amp;quot; box should be reversed (only putting someone through the flowchart if they say they like flowcharts). I think it makes less sense to have the first option &amp;quot;annoy&amp;quot; someone with a flowchart option until they say they don't like flowcharts, then put them through a flowchart. Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no evidence that the &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; box is asking you to &amp;quot;choose whichever you value more&amp;quot;. The graph shows your happiness as a function of time, not &amp;quot;your time&amp;quot; (it's not as if you were asked to choose between, say, more happiness or more spare time for yourself). I think it is just asking you to choose which axis of the graph you want to follow. The flowchart for the line graph and the scatter plot are similar; since &amp;quot;X or Y&amp;quot; is not interpreted as a question about value, why should &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; be?&lt;br /&gt;
 Zetfr 14:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment on the Fibonacci and Golden Spirals being the same is not correct.  According to Wikipedia{{w|Golden_Spiral|[1]}}{{w|Fibonacci_number|[2]}}: &amp;quot;A Fibonacci spiral '''approximates''' the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side.&amp;quot; - [[User:Prometheusmmiv|Prometheusmmiv]] ([[User talk:Prometheusmmiv|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has uploaded a new version, it fixes some missing lines: The scatter graph is now connected, as is the DC terminal, and the battery is now in a circuit. Some of the explaination above needs updating [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.47|141.101.99.47]] 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on the image takes you to http://xkcd.com/spiral/ {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch about  http://xkcd.com/spiral/ ! --[[User:Guest|Guest]] ([[User talk:Guest|talk]]) 17:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''NOTE''' this comic has been changed, oddly. http://xkcd.com/1488/ [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we change this wiki to have the updated image?  The XKCD site is updated, but this page still shows the old image. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have uploaded the correct version now. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The image is still out of date as it lacks the Yes / Never! markings on the Path of Least Resistance decision box. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.174|173.245.54.174]] 21:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a coincidence that a Fibonacci sequence has a link to the golden ratio? I think not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08 [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow - I tried the random button once and got to this comic: [[1359: Phone Alarm]]. For a second I thought he had rigged it - but that is was not the case. But that was not getting to something else ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84736</id>
		<title>Talk:1488: Flowcharts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1488:_Flowcharts&amp;diff=84736"/>
				<updated>2015-02-18T23:21:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment to a commenter&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A little bit more of 730? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.108|141.101.80.108]] 06:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:More along the lines of 94, 210, 518, 627, 844, 845, and 1195, though I see similarities with 730. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
How should we do the transcript? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 07:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   You could do the transcript as a number list formatted like: &amp;quot;[Title of item] IF YES(GOTO X), IF NO(GOTO Y)&amp;quot; (where &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot; are the numbers on the list for the corresponding next option). Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would just like to say that I find some of the linked spiral-images ''very'' disturbing. Although for some they'd be the same even ''without'' the spirals, admitedly. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 09:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this will end up being one of the most challenging explanations yet (of those that are completely explicable) - got quite a task up ahead... -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 10:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally (for a flowchart) the Start symbol should not have an input. The electrical circuit is not a rectifier! Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.103|108.162.254.103]] 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the newly corrected version, it is. [[User:Knob creek|Knob creek]] ([[User talk:Knob creek|talk]]) 16:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it doesn't need to be, since the rectification is done by the flow chart. Two of the diodes will never be used. (Is it still a rectifier if it's not rectifying?) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.182|108.162.249.182]] 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes it's still a rectifier. It just appears to be out of a job, that's all. Anyone else notice that the bridge rectifier IS a flowchart?!&lt;br /&gt;
OCD comment: There appear to be two lines missing, 1) from scatter plots to data or axis, 2) from the bottom of positive or negative DC terminal to the negative terminal of the battery.  Also, I would be happier if the two left hand diodes of the full wave rectifier were reversed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scatter plots don't have lines, that's the joke. {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.71}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either I was really tired this morning, or the spiral was not actually present in the first version of this comic.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.98|108.162.254.98]] 13:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like the options for the &amp;quot;Do you like flowcharts?&amp;quot; box should be reversed (only putting someone through the flowchart if they say they like flowcharts). I think it makes less sense to have the first option &amp;quot;annoy&amp;quot; someone with a flowchart option until they say they don't like flowcharts, then put them through a flowchart. Derek [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.107|108.162.216.107]] 13:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no evidence that the &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; box is asking you to &amp;quot;choose whichever you value more&amp;quot;. The graph shows your happiness as a function of time, not &amp;quot;your time&amp;quot; (it's not as if you were asked to choose between, say, more happiness or more spare time for yourself). I think it is just asking you to choose which axis of the graph you want to follow. The flowchart for the line graph and the scatter plot are similar; since &amp;quot;X or Y&amp;quot; is not interpreted as a question about value, why should &amp;quot;time or your happiness&amp;quot; be?&lt;br /&gt;
 Zetfr 14:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment on the Fibonacci and Golden Spirals being the same is not correct.  According to Wikipedia{{w|Golden_Spiral|[1]}}{{w|Fibonacci_number|[2]}}: &amp;quot;A Fibonacci spiral '''approximates''' the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side.&amp;quot; - [[User:Prometheusmmiv|Prometheusmmiv]] ([[User talk:Prometheusmmiv|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has uploaded a new version, it fixes some missing lines: The scatter graph is now connected, as is the DC terminal, and the battery is now in a circuit. Some of the explaination above needs updating [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.47|141.101.99.47]] 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clicking on the image takes you to http://xkcd.com/spiral/ {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Good catch about  http://xkcd.com/spiral/ ! --[[User:Guest|Guest]] ([[User talk:Guest|talk]]) 17:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''NOTE''' this comic has been changed, oddly. http://xkcd.com/1488/ [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we change this wiki to have the updated image?  The XKCD site is updated, but this page still shows the old image. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 18:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have uploaded the correct version now. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The image is still out of date as it lacks the Yes / Never! markings on the Path of Least Resistance decision box. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.174|173.245.54.174]] 21:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it a coincidence that a Fibonacci sequence has a link to the golden ratio? I think not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTWKKvlZB08 [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow - I tried the random button once and got to this comic: [[1359: Phone Alarm]]. For a second I thought he had rigged it - but that is was not the case. But that was not getting to something else ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78059</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78059"/>
				<updated>2014-10-30T10:08:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I first read the above as &amp;quot;... stars naked to the visible eye ...&amp;quot;. --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 23:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Almost all stars have a lifetime of at least a couple milions of years. However, some stars have lifetimes that extend on for billions of years after those few million. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 23:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Mulan15262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's absurdist fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond. If enough readers agree I think this belongs in the explanation. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The light cone thing is important I think. I read the whole discussion in the comic as a play on the concept of abosolute time vs relativity. And I found it hilarious with that interpretation. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.220|108.162.249.220]] 21:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Goose *is* dead. You fly jets long enough, something like this happens. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an obscure linkage between wild geese and stars: http://www.connectingthreads.com/tutorials/Stars-Flying_Geese_Variable_Stars__D12.html {{unsigned ip|‎173.245.52.180}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this comic is extremely simple at heart and it is an example of a comedic style called transference. This style was first widely popularized by the 1950s BBC radio broadcasts of The Goon Show and it was immediately adopted by Beyond The Fringe, Monty Python's Flying Circus, and The Firesign Theater, and countless others. In this style one takes two different seemingly unrelated systems or regimes of action or behavior, finds a superficial resemblance, and then transfers the behavior of one regime into that of the other no matter how absurd the result. Megan sees a flock of geese flying by and the moving V shape sparks in her mind the idea of a light cone. The idea of a light cone sparks the ideas of space and astrophysics. This is the superficial resemblance. She then transfers the knowledge she has of astrophysics to the behavior of the formation of geese flying above and draws the most extreme and absurd conclusions she can imagine. As one can see, this style is hallmarked by an extreme dedication to an unsupportable premise and is best played as absolutely deadpan and utterly serious and is driven by a tight focus on details. Megan displays this unreasonable dedication to a preposterous premise through to the last line. I think this comic is nothing more than that. No time dilation no relativity required. Just  the knowledge of both behaviors and the superficial resemblance! (By the way, I've been a big fan of The Goon Show since they first were broadcast in the US during the 60s. Wikipedia has a page on them and there is web site playing everyt remaining recording of theirs that is known to exist. It's here   http://goons.fabcat.org/  and I highly recommend it!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 10:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78057</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78057"/>
				<updated>2014-10-30T10:02:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I first read the above as &amp;quot;... stars naked to the visible eye ...&amp;quot;. --[[User:RenniePet|RenniePet]] ([[User talk:RenniePet|talk]]) 23:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Almost all stars have a lifetime of at least a couple milions of years. However, some stars have lifetimes that extend on for billions of years after those few million. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 23:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Mulan15262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's absurdist fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond. If enough readers agree I think this belongs in the explanation. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The light cone thing is important I think. I read the whole discussion in the comic as a play on the concept of abosolute time vs relativity. And I found it hilarious with that interpretation. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.220|108.162.249.220]] 21:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Goose *is* dead. You fly jets long enough, something like this happens. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an obscure linkage between wild geese and stars: http://www.connectingthreads.com/tutorials/Stars-Flying_Geese_Variable_Stars__D12.html {{unsigned ip|‎173.245.52.180}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this comic is extremely simple at heart and it is an example of a comedic style called transference. This style was first widely popularized by the 1950s BBC radio broadcasts of The Goon Show and it was immediately adopted by Beyond The Fringe, Monty Python's Flying Circus, and The Firesign Theater, and countless others. In this style one takes two different seemingly unrelated systems or regimes of action or behavior, finds a superficial resemblance, and then transfers the behavior of one regime into that of the other no matter how absurd the result. Megan sees a flock of geese flying by and the moving V shape sparks in her mind the idea of a light cone. The idea of a light cone sparks the ideas of space and astrophysics. This is the superficial resemblance. She then transfers the knowledge she has of astrophysics to the behavior of the formation of geese flying above and draws the most extreme and absurd conclusions she can imagine. As one can see, this style is hallmarked by an extreme dedication to an unsupportable premise and is best played as absolutely deadpan and utterly serious. Megan displays this unreasonable dedication to a preposterous premise through to the last line. I think this comic is nothing more than that. No time dilation no relativity required. Just  the knowledge of both behaviors and the superficial resemblance! (By the way, I've been a big fan of The Goon Show since they first were broadcast in the US during the 60s. Wikipedia has a page on them and there is web site playing everyt remaining recording of theirs that is known to exist. It's here   http://goons.fabcat.org/  and I highly recommend it!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 10:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78043</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78043"/>
				<updated>2014-10-29T21:11:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's absurdist fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond. If enough readers agree I think this belongs in the explanation. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Goose *is* dead. You fly jets long enough, something like this happens. [[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 21:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78041</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78041"/>
				<updated>2014-10-29T21:01:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Edit of my edited comment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond. If enough readers agree I think this belongs in the explanation. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78040</id>
		<title>Talk:1440: Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1440:_Geese&amp;diff=78040"/>
				<updated>2014-10-29T20:49:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment on meaning and intent of comic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The mere idea of geese spontaneously exploding mid-flight makes me giggle like a madman. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: 108.162.216.26, you're twisted. ... and now i can't stop thinking about it... and giggling. [[User:Iggynelix|Iggynelix]] ([[User talk:Iggynelix|talk]]) 16:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wasn't it a goose going supernova that caused the Tunguska event? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Time Dilation? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.185|173.245.56.185]] 09:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation should point out that the comic is referring to the common misconception that there is a high chance that a visible star is already dead. The facts are explained but the context is missing. This misconception was also mentioned in a what-if, but I cant find it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
The Milky Way is 120kly in diameter and most visible stars are much closer. With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years the probability for a random star being dead is way below 1%. Given that there are 5000 stars visible to the naked eye (under best viewing conditions), this means that statistically there are maybe 5 stars in the entire night sky that are dead already. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.215|108.162.231.215]] 09:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;With a lifetime of at least a couple millions of years&amp;quot;  True only for the most massive stars.  The average star in the Milky Way is around half a solar mass and will last around 50 billion years.  So the probability of one of the 5000 stars visible to the naked eye having died in the last 1000 years is even smaller than &amp;quot;way below 1%&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.146|199.27.128.146]] 16:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Although you are overstating things a bit, because more massive stars are more likely to be naked eye visible.  According to Wikipedia today, no M-class stars are naked eye visible at all. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.142|173.245.52.142]] 18:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this relates to a previous XKCD 1342: Ancient Stars (http://xkcd.com/1342/) where he makes the same joke of how stars may not necessarily be that far away. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.206|173.245.54.206]] 17:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No! The moving V of the geese is reminiscent of a light cone! I think that's what triggered Megan's fantasy. And indeed, we're seeing the geese as they were in the past. By about a microsecond.[[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 20:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73582</id>
		<title>Talk:1406: Universal Converter Box</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1406:_Universal_Converter_Box&amp;diff=73582"/>
				<updated>2014-08-13T07:01:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ExternalMonolog: Comment on interpretation/ alternate interpretation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would like to see what a gender changer for the petrol pump looks like... [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 04:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It’s a funnel. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Im more intereted in understanding how the conversion between 87, 91 and 93 octane and Diesel is taking place -- some mini refinery most be included [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No need for a mini refinery if you simply have 4 feed lines multiplexed through a valve.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 18:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess those folks still using their ADB keyboards are out of luck.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.129|108.162.216.129]] 04:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not true. ADB uses the same connector as S-Video, so they would be covered. [[User:Sayno2quat|Sayno2quat]] ([[User talk:Sayno2quat|talk]]) 13:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh god... there are quite a few blank spots on that gas pump, and we all know what Randall likes to do with [http://what-if.xkcd.com/35/ tape]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.211|173.245.56.211]] 04:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where's the old Mac DIN based serial port? I've got a Color Classic I'd like to resurrect! (No, seriously. It's got a math program on it that I paid about one &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;fifteenth &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; of what they're going for today!) [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 05:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probably related: [http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/21b3ob/walking_through_my_local_electronic_store_i_found/ HDMI — garden hose adapter] for pouring sh*t from the TV directly on your lawn. {{unsigned ip|141.101.75.19}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above garden hose comment reminds me of the classic Three Stooges film in which they are bungling plumbers who get confused and connect the electric wires to the pipes with impossible but hilarious results -- for instance a TV shows Niagara Falls then suddenly water comes gushing out of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.99|173.245.52.99]] 03:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original Ethernet used a fat coaxial cable known as &amp;quot;Garden Hose&amp;quot;. There were no hubs or switches, each station had a 'stinger' tap clamped to the coax. I used such a setup in the 1970s. [[User:Jim E|Jim E]] ([[User talk:Jim E|talk]]) 15:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: And did I miss BNC connectors?  BNC (co-ax, resistance-terminated, or sometimes looped integrated either by a stinger-clamp of some kind or (on balance, better) T-adapters between any number of shorter-length cables) was what I grew up with, with all its attendent foibles and influence on the distribution diagram (usually an ring-with-gap around the office, rather than a star topology, IME). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.13|141.101.98.13]] 22:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hate the fact that I can think of multiple standards that are not covered here. A gazillion DIN connectors, mini HDMI, RS232, Canon/XLR,... All the AC power adapters just on their own will weigh more than 22.7 kilograms. And seriously, how are we meant to connect our coaxial network cable to an iPhone2 with this? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 06:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: +1 [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little pissed that all those plugs and it still doesn't include an Australian 240v power plug... sigh. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.219|108.162.250.219]] 06:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: There are no power adapters in this afaik -- the title text talks about DC adapters, but they come in a separate bag [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I can see just one. I think it's the American plug, but I'm not sure (not familiar with what it looks like). It's got a removable ground pin. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.217|108.162.249.217]] 14:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Absolutely right, not sure how I missed that [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we're mentioning things Randall forgot, we have eSATA, 9-pin serial, there are at least three types of firewire, Multiple SCSI interface sizes, TRRS audio/mic connectors, 1/4&amp;quot; inch audio connectors, XLR, varous RF connectors, and a ton of power connectors. {{unsigned ip|173.245.56.210}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The STA and SCSI are mostly internal connections which users rarely had to worry about [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 07:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But there is external SCSI as well. Which sometimes needed to be manually numbered using DIP switches and properly terminated. --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first thing that came to my mind when I saw the magsafe 4 connector was the 'hair connector' from the avatar movie. That would really be the ultimate self-connecting magsafe successor. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.78|141.101.104.78]] 08:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the video cables in this comic actually are compatible: DVI is backwards-compatible with VGA, HDMI is (mostly) compatible with DVI, S-video is compatible with composite RCA, and SCART is compatible with VGA in addition to supporting both types of composite. Might want to note that somewhere in the article. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.195|108.162.219.195]] 08:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Display Port? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I noticed too that it was missing.  Not a bargain then, what a ripoff! :-) [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.151|199.27.128.151]] 17:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  male/female adapters has me wondering slightly...  Does the kit come with adapters for the fuel and the power plug?  Might make for a light generator.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.75|108.162.215.75]] 08:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was mildly sad to see that the token ring was not accompanied by a Tolkien ring.  —[[User:TobyBartels|TobyBartels]] ([[User talk:TobyBartels|talk]]) 08:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:+1 --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some more &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; items, and I'm wondering if we need to add all our suggestions in a single list to the main article.''' -- BigMal // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 12:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC keyboard DIN&lt;br /&gt;
:IBM PC joystick&lt;br /&gt;
:Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI)&lt;br /&gt;
:GPIB/HPIB (RS-485?) -- for electronics lab equipment (power supplies, desktop DMM, oscilloscope -- before USB and Ethernet)&lt;br /&gt;
:BNC (compostie video or analog signals)&lt;br /&gt;
:12V DC automotive power (old &amp;quot;cigarette lighter&amp;quot; port)&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-Board Diagnostic Connector (ODBC II -- automotive per SAE).&lt;br /&gt;
:Deutsch triangular SAE J1939/CAN connectors and &amp;quot;H1939&amp;quot; circular 9-pin Service Tool connector&lt;br /&gt;
:Other kinds of plumbing, inspired by the fuel pump -- US garden hose, various sizes of US NPT (National Pipe Thread?), various sizes of US &amp;quot;compression&amp;quot; thread&lt;br /&gt;
:and Pneumatic too -- all four of the most common pneumatic tool quick disconnects plus Schrader valve fitting (US standard for pneumatic tires) {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.209}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia, the 1st and 2nd gen MagSafe connectors in this image are swapped: What Randall labeled as MagSafe 1 is actually MagSafe 2 and vice-versa. [[User:Mezgrman|Mezgrman]] ([[User talk:Mezgrman|talk]]) 10:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, this isn't talking about generations, it's talking about actual connections. The ''MagSafe'' adapter was first developed with what Apple calls the &amp;quot;T&amp;quot; style form factor, then was aesthetically updated to the &amp;quot;L&amp;quot; style, which is labeled as &amp;quot;MagSafe&amp;quot; in the comic. The two form factors were interchangeable due to the actual connection and power flow being identical. ''MagSafe 2'' has returned to the &amp;quot;T&amp;quot; style, and was introduced with the Retina Display and newer MacBook Air models, and has a longer, thinner profile that is NOT interchangeable with regular MagSafe adapters, though a small adapter is available. [http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1713 MagSafe Troubleshooting] [http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2346 Identifying Power Adapters] --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.57|108.162.245.57]] 00:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do any of these connectors interface with the Raspberry Pi's GPIO?  (Wow, it took me surprisingly long to find the name of that.)  If not, can we add that to the list?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.41|108.162.216.41]] 13:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Floppy, IDE and SCSI IDC connectors will fit (but only using 2x13 pins of the 2x17/20/25 pins). So, no - none of these will interface directly with the Raspberry Pi. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 15:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one gender changer that bag won't have is the one for Token Ring... of all the adapters this thing can handle, I believe the Token Ring one is the only one without a gender -- one Token Ring plug plugs into another, or into the wall socket, etc. without needing to worry about whether you have a male connector or a female one. Though I guess the Bluetooth Dongle and string also don't need adapters, pe se... [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 14:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:One Token Ring to rule them all? --[[User:DivePeak|DivePeak]] ([[User talk:DivePeak|talk]]) 00:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, it'd prolly come with a block with two token ring plugs. A genderless gender switcher. A wireless extension cable. [[User:BenAgain|BenAgain]] ([[User talk:BenAgain|talk]]) 12:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Is the Magsafe 4 a reference to the connectors for hands and things from the movie A.I.?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the Magsafe 4 is supposed to look like those fancy auto-moving connectors from A.I. Artificial Intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.142|199.27.133.142]] 15:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Magsafe 4 could also be a reference to the Na'vi tendril/braid from Avatar. {{unsigned ip|108.162.238.156}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder where the 30-pin and the Lightning plug that Apple loves so much is. I could see if the 30-pin is hiding int the Floppy or something, but nowhere is the Lightning plug. What gives? [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.71|199.27.128.71]] 19:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Universal Business Adapter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There might be a hidden reference to a famous [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIOqOxI0K_I IBM TV Ad] from, dunno, late 90's or so, in this. I read somewhere that the joke was lost to some viewers and IBM actually put resources into developing an &amp;quot;universal adapter&amp;quot; for business clients due to the demand. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.203|141.101.80.203]] 19:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Diesel .v. petrol nozzles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A standard diesel nozzle is a bit thicker than a standard petrol nozzle so you cannot tank diesel into a petrol car but if this nozzle has the petrol nozzle diameter you are still able to tank with it into a diesel car.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement may be true in some countries, but not here in the UK, for standard pumps for&lt;br /&gt;
use with normal cars, vans, etc. That said, we also have separate, high speed, pump nozzles for lorries (=trucks :-) ) which are quite a bit larger than the standard petrol/diesel nozzle. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.214|141.101.98.214]] 08:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It is true in UK as well, the sizes are the same all over the world as it is standardized by SAE. Although there are large nozzles for trucks (usually 1 1/3&amp;quot; or 1 1/2&amp;quot;; also they don't stop filling automatically), even the one for cars is a bit larger than the petrol one (diesel has 15/16&amp;quot; diameter, petrol 13/16&amp;quot;). If you have a petrol-running car, you can easily check this :-) Interestingly, there used to be 15/16&amp;quot; nozzle for petrol as well but that was used for leaded only. And yes, the smaller size was introduced to avoid tanking leaded petrol into an unleaded-only car (Patent US4034784), not to avoid tanking diesel. [[User:Sten|'''S&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;TEN&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''']] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Sten|talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 23:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, he's missing a lot of fiber/fibre connections (think FDDI, Fibre Channel, ST, LC, MT, SC, MIC, ESCON, TOSLINK, etc. :-)!  He's missing whatever weird connectors were/are used for T-1 feeds.  Also, is that parallel port DB-25 or Centronics 36?  Note that SCSI has been seen to go over Centronics 36, DB-25, a 50-pin ribbon connector, 68 or 80 pin ribbon connectors that were shaped like a DB connector to key them, Fibre Channel (mentioned before), and SAS.  Does the kit come with terminators?  Better yet, for some SCSI drives, does it come with those little fiddly 8 or 9 pin terminating resistor packs that slid into plugs on the drive?  Also, I wonder if you can run whatever weird protocol that 3270 terminals used over that F-connector and use this adapter like an IRMA board between an iPhone and a raw mainframe feed (no Microsoft SNA Server required).  [[Special:Contributions/199.27.129.17|199.27.129.17]] 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC) Toby Ovod-Everett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hoo boy, IRMA board, that takes me back. Plainly Randall felt the need to stop at some point. [[User:Jim E|Jim E]] ([[User talk:Jim E|talk]]) 15:51, 12 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly it's missing the [http://xkcd.com/1293/ soup adapter]. {{unsigned ip|173.245.48.214}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've never seen the magsafe connectors but I thought the MAGSAFE 4 picture was a joke about a magnet so strong that the cord ripped off of the connector, leaving the connector on the still safe protected unit. [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 07:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ExternalMonolog</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>