<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Marcell</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Marcell"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Marcell"/>
		<updated>2026-04-29T01:53:27Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:258:_Conspiracy_Theories&amp;diff=65317</id>
		<title>Talk:258: Conspiracy Theories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:258:_Conspiracy_Theories&amp;diff=65317"/>
				<updated>2014-04-13T00:39:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marcell: god loves media theory&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I have an alternate interpretation of the last panel: instead of Randall using the concept of religion as a conspiracy theory, Cueball clearly believes in a god that exists and this god answers when directly addressed.  The existing paragraph's explanation seems to bypass most of the humor in favor of the irony in the religion-conspiracy link.  Each time I see this comic, I view the last panel as Cueball (who I would expect to participate in user-driven software quality assurance) legitimately contacting the author/creator (of the universe/Earth/Humanity) to submit a bug report in the same way he would contact the Firefox developers about a bug in their browser. However, it does stand to reason that Randall could have intended both the in-place joke and the external irony.[[User:Tryc|Tryc]] ([[User talk:Tryc|talk]]) 14:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that there is nothing in the comic to suggest a 'religion' or 'atheist' conspiracy theory.  I personally would just trash it, but people are sensitive to religious crap, I find.  I also have a personal belief that the majority of the 95% (or whatever the true figure is) of Americans who believe in God do so only to the extent that they will answer 'Yes' to a survey question asking if they believe in God.  Such a belief does not otherwise inform or alter their lives in any perceptible way.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 19:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religion is not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theorists have proof. {{unsigned ip|199.27.128.63}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For me, the most interesting tension comes from (&amp;quot;self-reflective&amp;quot;) bug report which doesn't (only) refer to conspiracy theorists but, maybe even more, to Cueball himself who beleives in God but still thinks that his own belief in God is a bug to be reported. Reporting could be seen as reporting to God in which he beleives. And that's the simple one. But also reporting that bug could be a report to the consciousness existing beyond the constraints of very comic Cueball is part of. That consciousness is then xkcd audience. Existence of such a consciousness beyond comic's universe would be the equivalent of God in some other universe. Self-reflective awareness of that &amp;quot;alien&amp;quot; existence, and not having a proof for its own comic universe, would make Cueball a religious guy. Randall Munroe decides about the proving possibilities in this particular case. [[User:Marcell|Marcell]] ([[User talk:Marcell|talk]]) 00:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Marcell</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>