<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mikemk</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mikemk"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Mikemk"/>
		<updated>2026-04-17T12:59:15Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikemk&amp;diff=212124</id>
		<title>User talk:Mikemk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikemk&amp;diff=212124"/>
				<updated>2021-05-18T18:53:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: forgot to login before posting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Are you a turtle though? [[User:Donthaveusername|Donthaveusername]] ([[User talk:Donthaveusername|talk]]) 23:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd quite like to know the answer to that -[[User:Char Latte49|Char Latte49]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 15:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mikemk|Here's an answer]] [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 18:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210041</id>
		<title>Talk:2447: Hammer Incident</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210041"/>
				<updated>2021-04-08T17:26:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* inspiration */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
big --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.187.153|162.158.187.153]] 02:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a basic explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.212.224|162.158.212.224]] 02:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we really need a huge paragraph explaining all the reasons why any damage to a space telescope is a big, expensive deal? And I'm not sure this is a trial, it's probably more like an administrative panel hearing (like the hearings after the Challenger disaster). [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 14:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Giant comic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it meant to be that size? Does the bad luck apply to trying to upload comics at reasonable sizes? &lt;br /&gt;
: It's fixed now&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.19|172.69.33.19]] 02:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oooh boy, indeed... &amp;quot;Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP&amp;quot; is the Wiki's assessment of the auto-uploaded image. I haven't checked the resolution, but the https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png one is apparently 4332x4838 (scales to 8% on my device), and I don't care to test the _2x version right now. I'm not sure that was the native res of it on creation, looks to be an accidental up-scaling prior to posting to xkcd itself. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.6|141.101.98.6]] 02:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
::The _2x version is actually the proper size for a normal comic - 578x645 pixels. [[User:Noëlle|Noëlle]] ([[User talk:Noëlle|talk]]) 02:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Still seems larger than normal to me, even the 2x seems larger than I would expect. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.78|172.69.34.78]] 04:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe the extra-large image is what the original looks like using the James Webb telescope?  Maybe over-thinking. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.145|172.68.132.145]] 04:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or perhaps its an resolution/aspect ratio/zoom factor difference between it and the old telescope. Implying all other comics have secretly been placed in front of the other telescope [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50|172.69.170.50]] 04:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps overthinking, if the main reflecting mirror was actually destroyed, the light entering the telescope would never be focused into the secondary mirror and the image would be &amp;quot;light size&amp;quot; so you would only be able to see a small portion of what you expect&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks to me that, while most of the text is rendered smoothly in full resolution, the caption below the panel (&amp;quot;Man, NASA is really on my case about the James Webb Space Telescope.&amp;quot;) is very jaggy on a pixel level, but only on the Y-axis. There could be quite a bit of information in there. No idea what it means, though. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.36|141.101.77.36]] 07:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It could be floating-point errors that indicate the code flow of the renderer Randall used.  Or it could mean anything else.  Curious to compare it to a correct rendering of that text with the same font, but wouldn't know what to do with the vector of edge differences myself. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems to be fixed now so I am sure it was an accident&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall has now uploaded an even smaller resolution image of 289 × 323 ([https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png]), and I have added it to this comic explanation. [[User:Natg19|Natg19]] ([[User talk:Natg19|talk]]) 17:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== inspiration ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I read this comic I was worried it might have been inspired by recent news of something breaking during the final assembly process. Fortunately this seems not to be the case. Among the many delays of the telescope, were any of them caused by mirror and/or cryo failures that might have inspired this comic? [[User:Quantum7|Quantum7]] ([[User talk:Quantum7|talk]]) 05:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What caused the most recent delay? It seems it's been pushed forward more as Randall predicted in the other comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing that it was the recent announcement of the planned science for the first year of operation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.21|162.158.74.21]] 16:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was also worried and figured explainxkcd would tell if there had been any real issues. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 17:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cryogenic? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the sense that the title text is inspired by liquid nitrogen ice cream. -- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.252|108.162.237.252]] 13:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Actual hammering applied to JWST ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Quantum7, I was worried too and googled &amp;quot;JWST hammer&amp;quot; only to find this actual contributor to the project…&lt;br /&gt;
The Hammers Company, Inc. Greenbelt, MD in this list:&lt;br /&gt;
: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/meetTheTeam/team.html&lt;br /&gt;
Not all JWST-engineering seams to be that delicate – should we be worried? {{unsigned|162.158.203.15}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Amount of gold ==&lt;br /&gt;
The James Webb Telescope only has &amp;lt;$2000 of gold. [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/04/05/how-much-gold-is-in-the-james-webb-space-telescope/?sh=4f80bc9d69e5]] {{unsigned|172.68.189.191}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm going to remove the gold thing. It's a complete red herring. The materials represent such a tiny fraction of the cost of coating a mirror that it's not even worth mentioning. Coating a mirror with aluminum or protected silver costs virtually the same as coating it in gold. The fact that the mirrors are made from beryllium is a much larger factor in the cost. [[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|talk]]) 16:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210040</id>
		<title>Talk:2447: Hammer Incident</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210040"/>
				<updated>2021-04-08T17:25:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Actual hammering applied to JWST */ marked missing signature&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
big --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.187.153|162.158.187.153]] 02:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a basic explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.212.224|162.158.212.224]] 02:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we really need a huge paragraph explaining all the reasons why any damage to a space telescope is a big, expensive deal? And I'm not sure this is a trial, it's probably more like an administrative panel hearing (like the hearings after the Challenger disaster). [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 14:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Giant comic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it meant to be that size? Does the bad luck apply to trying to upload comics at reasonable sizes? &lt;br /&gt;
: It's fixed now&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.19|172.69.33.19]] 02:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oooh boy, indeed... &amp;quot;Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP&amp;quot; is the Wiki's assessment of the auto-uploaded image. I haven't checked the resolution, but the https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png one is apparently 4332x4838 (scales to 8% on my device), and I don't care to test the _2x version right now. I'm not sure that was the native res of it on creation, looks to be an accidental up-scaling prior to posting to xkcd itself. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.6|141.101.98.6]] 02:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
::The _2x version is actually the proper size for a normal comic - 578x645 pixels. [[User:Noëlle|Noëlle]] ([[User talk:Noëlle|talk]]) 02:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Still seems larger than normal to me, even the 2x seems larger than I would expect. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.78|172.69.34.78]] 04:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe the extra-large image is what the original looks like using the James Webb telescope?  Maybe over-thinking. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.145|172.68.132.145]] 04:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or perhaps its an resolution/aspect ratio/zoom factor difference between it and the old telescope. Implying all other comics have secretly been placed in front of the other telescope [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50|172.69.170.50]] 04:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps overthinking, if the main reflecting mirror was actually destroyed, the light entering the telescope would never be focused into the secondary mirror and the image would be &amp;quot;light size&amp;quot; so you would only be able to see a small portion of what you expect&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks to me that, while most of the text is rendered smoothly in full resolution, the caption below the panel (&amp;quot;Man, NASA is really on my case about the James Webb Space Telescope.&amp;quot;) is very jaggy on a pixel level, but only on the Y-axis. There could be quite a bit of information in there. No idea what it means, though. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.36|141.101.77.36]] 07:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It could be floating-point errors that indicate the code flow of the renderer Randall used.  Or it could mean anything else.  Curious to compare it to a correct rendering of that text with the same font, but wouldn't know what to do with the vector of edge differences myself. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems to be fixed now so I am sure it was an accident&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall has now uploaded an even smaller resolution image of 289 × 323 ([https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png]), and I have added it to this comic explanation. [[User:Natg19|Natg19]] ([[User talk:Natg19|talk]]) 17:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== inspiration ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I read this comic I was worried it might have been inspired by recent news of something breaking during the final assembly process. Fortunately this seems not to be the case. Among the many delays of the telescope, were any of them caused by mirror and/or cryo failures that might have inspired this comic? [[User:Quantum7|Quantum7]] ([[User talk:Quantum7|talk]]) 05:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What caused the most recent delay? It seems it's been pushed forward more as Randall predicted in the other comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing that it was the recent announcement of the planned science for the first year of operation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.21|162.158.74.21]] 16:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cryogenic? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the sense that the title text is inspired by liquid nitrogen ice cream. -- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.252|108.162.237.252]] 13:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Actual hammering applied to JWST ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Quantum7, I was worried too and googled &amp;quot;JWST hammer&amp;quot; only to find this actual contributor to the project…&lt;br /&gt;
The Hammers Company, Inc. Greenbelt, MD in this list:&lt;br /&gt;
: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/meetTheTeam/team.html&lt;br /&gt;
Not all JWST-engineering seams to be that delicate – should we be worried? {{unsigned|162.158.203.15}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Amount of gold ==&lt;br /&gt;
The James Webb Telescope only has &amp;lt;$2000 of gold. [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/04/05/how-much-gold-is-in-the-james-webb-space-telescope/?sh=4f80bc9d69e5]] {{unsigned|172.68.189.191}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm going to remove the gold thing. It's a complete red herring. The materials represent such a tiny fraction of the cost of coating a mirror that it's not even worth mentioning. Coating a mirror with aluminum or protected silver costs virtually the same as coating it in gold. The fact that the mirrors are made from beryllium is a much larger factor in the cost. [[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|talk]]) 16:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210039</id>
		<title>Talk:2447: Hammer Incident</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2447:_Hammer_Incident&amp;diff=210039"/>
				<updated>2021-04-08T17:23:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Amount of gold */  marked missing signature&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
big --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.187.153|162.158.187.153]] 02:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a basic explanation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.212.224|162.158.212.224]] 02:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we really need a huge paragraph explaining all the reasons why any damage to a space telescope is a big, expensive deal? And I'm not sure this is a trial, it's probably more like an administrative panel hearing (like the hearings after the Challenger disaster). [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 14:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Giant comic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it meant to be that size? Does the bad luck apply to trying to upload comics at reasonable sizes? &lt;br /&gt;
: It's fixed now&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.19|172.69.33.19]] 02:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oooh boy, indeed... &amp;quot;Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP&amp;quot; is the Wiki's assessment of the auto-uploaded image. I haven't checked the resolution, but the https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png one is apparently 4332x4838 (scales to 8% on my device), and I don't care to test the _2x version right now. I'm not sure that was the native res of it on creation, looks to be an accidental up-scaling prior to posting to xkcd itself. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.6|141.101.98.6]] 02:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
::The _2x version is actually the proper size for a normal comic - 578x645 pixels. [[User:Noëlle|Noëlle]] ([[User talk:Noëlle|talk]]) 02:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Still seems larger than normal to me, even the 2x seems larger than I would expect. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.78|172.69.34.78]] 04:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe the extra-large image is what the original looks like using the James Webb telescope?  Maybe over-thinking. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.145|172.68.132.145]] 04:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or perhaps its an resolution/aspect ratio/zoom factor difference between it and the old telescope. Implying all other comics have secretly been placed in front of the other telescope [[Special:Contributions/172.69.170.50|172.69.170.50]] 04:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps overthinking, if the main reflecting mirror was actually destroyed, the light entering the telescope would never be focused into the secondary mirror and the image would be &amp;quot;light size&amp;quot; so you would only be able to see a small portion of what you expect&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks to me that, while most of the text is rendered smoothly in full resolution, the caption below the panel (&amp;quot;Man, NASA is really on my case about the James Webb Space Telescope.&amp;quot;) is very jaggy on a pixel level, but only on the Y-axis. There could be quite a bit of information in there. No idea what it means, though. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.36|141.101.77.36]] 07:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It could be floating-point errors that indicate the code flow of the renderer Randall used.  Or it could mean anything else.  Curious to compare it to a correct rendering of that text with the same font, but wouldn't know what to do with the vector of edge differences myself. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems to be fixed now so I am sure it was an accident&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall has now uploaded an even smaller resolution image of 289 × 323 ([https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/hammer_incident.png]), and I have added it to this comic explanation. [[User:Natg19|Natg19]] ([[User talk:Natg19|talk]]) 17:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== inspiration ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I read this comic I was worried it might have been inspired by recent news of something breaking during the final assembly process. Fortunately this seems not to be the case. Among the many delays of the telescope, were any of them caused by mirror and/or cryo failures that might have inspired this comic? [[User:Quantum7|Quantum7]] ([[User talk:Quantum7|talk]]) 05:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What caused the most recent delay? It seems it's been pushed forward more as Randall predicted in the other comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.140|162.158.63.140]] 09:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm guessing that it was the recent announcement of the planned science for the first year of operation. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.21|162.158.74.21]] 16:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cryogenic? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the sense that the title text is inspired by liquid nitrogen ice cream. -- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.252|108.162.237.252]] 13:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Actual hammering applied to JWST ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Quantum7, I was worried too and googled &amp;quot;JWST hammer&amp;quot; only to find this actual contributor to the project…&lt;br /&gt;
The Hammers Company, Inc. Greenbelt, MD in this list:&lt;br /&gt;
: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/meetTheTeam/team.html&lt;br /&gt;
Not all JWST-engineering seams to be that delicate – should we be worried?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Amount of gold ==&lt;br /&gt;
The James Webb Telescope only has &amp;lt;$2000 of gold. [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/04/05/how-much-gold-is-in-the-james-webb-space-telescope/?sh=4f80bc9d69e5]] {{unsigned|172.68.189.191}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'm going to remove the gold thing. It's a complete red herring. The materials represent such a tiny fraction of the cost of coating a mirror that it's not even worth mentioning. Coating a mirror with aluminum or protected silver costs virtually the same as coating it in gold. The fact that the mirrors are made from beryllium is a much larger factor in the cost. [[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|talk]]) 16:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2389:_Unread&amp;diff=202259</id>
		<title>Talk:2389: Unread</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2389:_Unread&amp;diff=202259"/>
				<updated>2020-11-24T00:25:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have 27,333 unread emails.  On the level of &amp;quot;Your email is important to me.  Please wait and it'll get read eventually.&amp;quot;  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 00:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200652</id>
		<title>2377: xkcd Phone 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200652"/>
				<updated>2020-10-27T05:22:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2377&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = xkcd Phone 12&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = xkcd_phone_12.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = New phone OS features: Infinite customization (home screen icons no longer snap to grid), dark mode (disables screen), screaming mode (self-explanatory), and coherent ultracapacitor-pumped emission (please let us know what this setting does; we've been afraid to try it).&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a PERSON NAMED MAX. Closed timelike curves need more explanation. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the &amp;quot;12th&amp;quot; in the ongoing xkcd Phone series in which Randall explains his new joke phone designs with many strange and useless features. It is also a reference to the recently released {{w|iPhone 12}}. However, there have only been 9 comics released, with the previous two being [[2000: xkcd Phone 2000]] and [[1889: xkcd Phone 6]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note about the xkcd Phone 12 and the xkcd Phone 12 Max (only for people named Max) is a joke about the different models of iPhone 12: iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max. The xkcd Phone 12 Max would be expected to have a larger screen, but it seems that this phone is also only for people with the name Max.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slogan '&amp;quot;The only phone you'll ever own&amp;quot;' has the &amp;quot;registered trademark&amp;quot; symbol, with that symbol supposedly itself trademarked, which is highly unlikely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Full drivetrain warranty''' - A common warranty feature for automobiles--see {{w|drivetrain}}. As a side note, the phone here would be cheaping out on the warranty if it were a car; a &amp;quot;drivetrain&amp;quot; warranty covers everything ''except'' the engine; only if it was a &amp;quot;{{w|powertrain}}&amp;quot; warranty would it cover the engine. A phone typically has none of these things, although this one seemingly does.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Coated for easy swallowing''' - A common feature on solid medicines meant to be taken orally. Phones do not belong in the set of edible objects, much less orally-taken medicines{{Citation needed}}.  Since some parents of young children let them teethe on their phones, this would be an undesirable feature. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Surgical-grade apps''' - &amp;quot;Surgical-grade steel&amp;quot; is sometime used as a selling point indicating quality materials. This feature suggests that the apps themselves are made from high-quality material, although this is absurd because an app is (as the name suggests) a software application, not any physical object that could be reasonably defined as 'surgical-grade' or not.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Built-in 600 lb magnet for magnet fishing''' - {{w|Magnet fishing}} is an activity for searching for objects that can be pulled in by a strong magnet. A 600 pound magnet can lift a 600 pound object (at Earth's surface). This would tend to make the phone stick to any iron or steel objects (such as refrigerators) and be impossible to remove with human strength, and only the strongest humans could pick up the phone even if it were properly insulated.  It would also be impossible to separate two phones without destroying one of them if the interlocking feature were used. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Oral-B partnership: hold phone against teeth to ultrasonically remove plaque''' - This is a reference to {{w|ultrasonic toothbrush}}es. {{w|Oral-B}} does not produce any ultrasonic toothbrushes, but does produce ''{{w|sonic toothbrush}}es.'' There is a logical connection between electric toothbrushes and smartphones, namely they are both electronic and both vibrate; however, most phones cannot perform dentistry autonomously{{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''40 mL emergency water supply''' - Many phones are now water-resistant to some degree; this phone ships with water included. Furthermore, {{w|survival kits}} often come with pouches that can hold several litres of water, in case of emergency. This would be a silly feature, and it is unclear what emergencies would be solved by having such a small amount of water.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Security feature: unmarked side buttons''' - Some modern phones have unmarked side buttons, so the secureness of this feature is doubtful. This phone is likely to have trillions of buttons though, just to confuse the user. No buttons are visible which could indicate the side of the phone functions is touch sensitive and the buttons are not only unlabeled but not visible.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''3,000,000-volt arc allows wireless charging from a range of up to 36 inches''' - Possibly from a Tesla coil. 3,000,000 volts is very lethal{{Citation needed}}, and would make using the phone impossible due to the high voltage emitted. The {{w|Electrical breakdown}} voltage of air is approximately 3 kV / mm, which would allow a 3 MV potential to jump a distance of 100 cm. 36 inches (91 cm), however, is within reach of a simple extension cord.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''99.9% BPA- and hands- free''' - {{w|Bisphenol A}} (or BPA) is a compound that is used in making plastics. BPA has been found to exhibit hormone-like properties, so there is a movement to produce BPA-free plastics using alternative bisphenols. {{w|Hands-free}} describes using the device &amp;quot;without hands&amp;quot;, e.g. using voice commands. This is important when using a device while driving. These are 2 unrelated ideas, but both have the suffix -free.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Extended release charge cable''' - Electronics manufacturers support standards to reduce time to fully recharge, e.g. Qualcomm {{w|Quick Charge}} standard. This is a reference to &amp;quot;extended release&amp;quot; medication. It's unclear what purpose would be served by charging a phone slower than normal.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Closed timelike curves''' - Given that {{w|Closed timelike curves}} are usually associated with solutions to general relativity that allow for time travel...&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Fits in standard shipping container''' - An {{w|intermodal shipping container}} is large enough to fit automobiles, raising the question of just how big this xkcd phone is.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Interlocking, stackable''' - A quality of, among other things, LEGO bricks. Probably a bad idea to use this feature, given how close the phone is to critical mass.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Nintendo partnership: GameBoy Printer compatibility''' - The {{w|Game Boy Printer}} was a thermal paper printer originally paired with the Game Boy Camera. This device was released in 1998 and discontinued in 2003, so this partnership would be obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sustain pedal''' - A {{w|sustain pedal}} is commonly associated with a digital keyboard or piano; it lets the note continue sounding when the key is released. It's unclear what purpose it would serve in a phone.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''CDC partnership: when in an indoor space with too many people, phone begins playing &amp;quot;We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)&amp;quot; at slowly increasing volume until everyone leaves''' - An allusion to the COVID-19 pandemic. &amp;quot;{{w|We Like to Party! (Vengaboys song)|We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)}}&amp;quot; is a 1998 Eurodance/techno hit by the Vengaboys, and is perhaps most familiar to Americans from a series of Six Flags ads.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Sacrificial anode''' - Useful if something metal (like, say, a boat) will be in a wet environment for a long time. The {{w|sacrificial anode}} is made of a material with higher redox potential (typically zinc), and will corrode faster than the (more valuable) metal object it's attached to. It's unclear if the phone HAS a sacrificial anode or IS a sacrificial anode.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tactical helium reserve''' - Since 1925, the United States has had a {{w|National Helium Reserve|strategic helium reserve}}. Helium is very rare on earth and has important scientific and military uses, so it’s important to have a supply in case supplies disappear. But here we have a tactical helium reserve, which suggests it's smaller and focused on shorter-term goals. Compare {{w|strategic bombing}} focused on destroying entire cities or countries and {{w|tactical bombing}} aimed at destroying individual targets or military units.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''50% below critical mass (2x safety factor)''' - Indicates the phone contains fissile material. This &amp;quot;2x safety factor&amp;quot; means that if you put 2 phones next to each other, or put one phone next to a {{w|neutron reflector}}, you would have a {{w|criticality accident}}, which may explain why you would not own another phone after this one. A phone with this much fissile material would pose a radiation hazard. The &amp;quot;2x safety factor&amp;quot; claim may be related to physicist {{w|Richard Feynman|Richard Feynman's}} famous criticism of NASA in the {{w|Rogers Commission}} report on the space shuttle Challenger disaster. Feynman found that when he confronted NASA engineers with a part worn one third of the way through, which was not supposed to be worn through at all, the engineers claimed that this demonstrated a 3x safety factor rather than a failure of the part.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Shake for factory reset''' - A {{w|factory reset}} is often possible on electronic devices, and is usually accomplished either by pressing a button or closing an electrical bridge. This one works like an Etch-a-Sketch. This would not be preferred, as slight disturbances could easily cause massive losses of data. This would not be possible to shake anyway, given the 600-pound magnet stuck inside, so it would probably have to be extremely sensitive, which is not in any way a plus.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Norton MacAfee protection: if you're ever attacked by John MacAfee, Peter Norton will come out of retirement to defend you'''. {{w|Norton (software)|Norton}} and {{w|MacAfee}} are competing software security companies. This &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; combines the two of them and claims that Norton (the person) will defend you if MacAfee (the person) attacks you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text mentions xkcd phone OS updates, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Infinite customization (home screen icons no longer snap to grid)''' - Whether on-screen icons snap to a grid is a very minor aspect of customization. Not having it would be the ultimate bane of anyone with {{w|obsessive-compulsive disorder}}, as it would make it very difficult to get icons exactly lined up vertically and horizontally.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Dark mode (disables screen)''' - Dark mode is a popular feature on websites/apps with light backgrounds like Twitter and Reddit, changing the background to a dark color to help late-night users sleep better. Disabling the screen would not be a pleasant surprise when a user goes to turn on beloved dark mode. May be impossible to turn off if the screen is no longer touch sensitive when darkened unless the unmarked buttons can be used to disable it. Also a possible reason to want to use the shake-activated factory reset.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Screaming mode (self-explanatory)''' - The phone screams. Reference to the screaming-while-falling [[1363: xkcd Phone|xkcd Phone 1]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Coherent ultracapacitor-pumped emission (please let us know what this setting does; we've been afraid to try it)''' - This mysterious feature has a terrifying name, with even the developers refusing to test it out. This option would probably be very easy to accidentally tap, given the style of every xkcd Phone ever. Possibly activated with one of the unlabeled buttons making it even more dangerous. Coherent and Emission are associated with laser devices and the use of a laser could justify the helium reserve. Raises the question of who designs the phone if the people marketing it don't know what it does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Full drivetrain warranty&lt;br /&gt;
* Coated for easy swallowing&lt;br /&gt;
* Surgical-grade apps&lt;br /&gt;
* Built-in 600 lb magnet for magnet fishing&lt;br /&gt;
* Oral-B partnership: hold phone against teeth to ultrasonically remove plaque&lt;br /&gt;
* 40 mL emergency water supply&lt;br /&gt;
* Security feature: unmarked side buttons&lt;br /&gt;
* 3,000,000-volt arc allows wireless charging from a range of up to 36 inches&lt;br /&gt;
* 99.9% BPA- and hands- free&lt;br /&gt;
* Extended release charge cable&lt;br /&gt;
* Closed timelike curves&lt;br /&gt;
* Fits in standard shipping container&lt;br /&gt;
* Interlocking, stackable&lt;br /&gt;
* Nintendo partnership: GameBoy Printer compatibility&lt;br /&gt;
* Sustain Pedal&lt;br /&gt;
* CDC partnership: when in an indoor space with too many people, phone begins playing &amp;quot;We Like To Party! (The Vengabus)&amp;quot; at slowly increasing volume until everyone leaves&lt;br /&gt;
* Sacrificial anode&lt;br /&gt;
* Tactical helium reserve&lt;br /&gt;
* 50% below critical mass (2x safety factor)&lt;br /&gt;
* Shake for factory reset&lt;br /&gt;
* Norton MacAfee protection: if you're ever attacked by John MacAfee, Peter Norton will come out of retirement to defend you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The xkcd Phone 12* and 12 Max**&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*Standard&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;  **For people named Max&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The only phone you'll ever own&amp;quot;®™&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd Phones]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics sharing name|xkcd Phones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200651</id>
		<title>Talk:2377: xkcd Phone 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200651"/>
				<updated>2020-10-27T05:19:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any way to install the Vengaboys feature on my own phone? It's pure genius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it's coated for easy swallowing, perhaps it's actually a tablet... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.54|162.158.155.54]] 22:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps by taking data from infrared sensors and microphones, an app could automatically start the song? Might have some interesting copyright issues, tho idk how those things work … [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.124|162.158.63.124]] 23:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disabling the screen is a real feature (though it's called screen curtain on iOS https://support.apple.com/en-ca/HT201443). {{unsigned|108.162.241.70}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 600LB magnet doesn't weigh 600 pounds, it's strong enough to hold 600 pounds.  And if you used the interlocking feature, and it doesn't explode, you'd never be able to pull the phones apart.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 01:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just looked up 600 lb fishing magnets on Amazon.com. They weigh a couple lbs. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 05:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would actually buy something with Game Boy Printer compatibility. [[User:Unpopular Opinions|Goodbye, world!]] ([[User talk:Unpopular Opinions|talk]]) 03:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John MacAfee fled Belize (and the Belize police) when he was wanted for questioning as a “person of interest” in the murder of Gregory Viant Faull.  I suspect that that is part of why Randal posits an attack from John MacAfee (and defense from Peter Norton, who (unlike John) hasn’t completely lost his mind).  I think he is also on the run from Spanish authorities for tax evasion.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.136|173.245.54.136]] 04:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't many mobile games use shaking as a way to reset or roll the dice? [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 05:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also Moto phones use shaking to turn on the flashlight.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200636</id>
		<title>Talk:2377: xkcd Phone 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200636"/>
				<updated>2020-10-27T01:44:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: Added someone's missing signature&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any way to install the Vengaboys feature on my own phone? It's pure genius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it's coated for easy swallowing, perhaps it's actually a tablet... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.54|162.158.155.54]] 22:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps by taking data from infrared sensors and microphones, an app could automatically start the song? Might have some interesting copyright issues, tho idk how those things work … [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.124|162.158.63.124]] 23:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disabling the screen is a real feature (though it's called screen curtain on iOS https://support.apple.com/en-ca/HT201443). {{unsigned|108.162.241.70}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 600LB magnet doesn't weigh 600 pounds, it's strong enough to hold 600 pounds.  And if you used the interlocking feature, and it doesn't explode, you'd never be able to pull the phones apart.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 01:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200635</id>
		<title>Talk:2377: xkcd Phone 12</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2377:_xkcd_Phone_12&amp;diff=200635"/>
				<updated>2020-10-27T01:42:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any way to install the Vengaboys feature on my own phone? It's pure genius&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it's coated for easy swallowing, perhaps it's actually a tablet... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.54|162.158.155.54]] 22:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps by taking data from infrared sensors and microphones, an app could automatically start the song? Might have some interesting copyright issues, tho idk how those things work … [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.124|162.158.63.124]] 23:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disabling the screen is a real feature (though it's called screen curtain on iOS https://support.apple.com/en-ca/HT201443).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 600LB magnet doesn't weigh 600 pounds, it's strong enough to hold 600 pounds.  And if you used the interlocking feature, and it doesn't explode, you'd never be able to pull the phones apart.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 01:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Dgbrt&amp;diff=196141</id>
		<title>User talk:Dgbrt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Dgbrt&amp;diff=196141"/>
				<updated>2020-08-19T15:05:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Thanks for maintaining the bot! */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See the history for more:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User talk:Dgbrt/2013|2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User talk:Dgbrt/2014|2014]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[User talk:Dgbrt/2015-2017|2015-2017]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Create comic page in lieu of DgbrtBOT ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I could see [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1969:_Not_Available&amp;amp;action=history here] that the bot seemed to have failed this time (or did RamenChef fail to wait long enough?) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah sorry, saw your comment in the [[Talk:1969: Not Available|Discussion]] now. Great if it has been fixed. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ReCAPTCHA ==&lt;br /&gt;
ReCAPTCHA v1 has expired, and since no one replied on the admin forum, I asked Kynde, and he told me to come to you. So can you upgrade it to v2? Thanks. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 13:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]], this is bad. Also email notification doesn't work since a long time. All admins are nonexistent since months and I don't have access the the server. I will check what I can do with the BOT account. But there is not much hope. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh... ok. But if I remember correctly, I think one of the admins (I think Jeff?) has a twitter account, but I don't have one and I can't ask on twitter. Could you like contact him that way? And maybe tell him to add a few admins to deal with problems like this? Thanks! [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 10:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]], I don't have a twitter account too, but I will sign in when things go worse. And this will happen in the future when all admins are still absent because:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The next invoice for the web-service at Cloudflare must be paid.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The name registration at namecheap.com will expire on 2018-08-10.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And it seems that there is no advertising here on the left. So we definitely need new admins here to address these and other issues. I would apply for this, but not alone. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 13:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Dgbrt, I saw your message both here and on Wikipedia. Messaging me on my talk page is enough, I'll see it in my feed reader. Unfortunately, I can't do anything about recaptcha as I don't have ssh access to the server. --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 15:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your reply [[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]]. You don't have ssh access but as an Administrator you are maybe able to send an email to the relevant persons. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Unfortunately, I don't have [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]'s email address either. --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 06:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
'''The problem is solved.''' --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry Dgbt (and all my other friendly editors/helpers!) &lt;br /&gt;
Let me know what needs to be done and I'll work through it.  I'm going to try to be much more proactive and logged in.  It's been a busy few months.  Please accept my apologies.&lt;br /&gt;
The main complication with reCaptcha is that to upgrade to use ReCaptchaNoCaptcha, I'd have to upgrade the wiki.  I'm not opposed, it is just a larger work effort than I thought!  We are also quite a bit behind! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 03:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A slight technical problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image size for comics is a bit off, the zoom is weird and there's some space to the right of the screen... Not sure what to do about it, but as an admin now (congratulations, by the way!) you should be able to deal with it. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 13:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]], what is weird? Please give an example of what's wrong and how it should be. BTW: To be an admin just means more work ;) --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 13:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems that there's only one problem left, rather than the three I mentioned before, but it's still a problem. For example, normally pages should be like this, where there's a sidebar to the left, and the rest is the page you're viewing. But now for comic explanations, there's an empty sidebar on the right side of the screen that shouldn't be there, and the page itself has been squeezed so now it only takes up about 60% of the screen's width. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 01:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry for the delay, but it should be fixed now. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unicode issues with the Bot ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, your bot doesn't handle UTF-8 in the alt-text well, as seen on today's comic [[2038]] :P This is a known problem with the xkcd api, which double-utf-8-encodes everything. I believe I've read your bot is programmed in Perl, so I may be able to help fix this. There is a module on CPAN to fix this automagically, [https://metacpan.org/pod/Encode::DoubleEncodedUTF8 Encode::DoubleEncodedUTF8] [[User:Gir|//gir.st/]] ([[User talk:Gir|talk]]) 13:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:'''E''': I've sent you a PR; https://github.com/dgbrt/explainXKCD_update/pull/3 [[User:Gir|//gir.st/]] ([[User talk:Gir|talk]]) 13:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I was replying at the same time:&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, you can find the GitHub link here: [[User:DgbrtBOT]]. The latest changes are a little bit ugly because I've had to find a fast solution on the forced https connection. Nonetheless the unicode issue is well known, until now I simply was too lazy. And reading the warnings at the DoubleEncodedUTF8 module tells me it should be solved in a better way.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure, but my CentOS environment looks good:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;env | grep LANG&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives me&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;LANG=en_US.UTF-8&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The Perl script already has &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;binmode STDOUT, ':utf8';&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; which was needed so maybe the same for &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;STDIN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; could help. Any ideas? I have a Wiki at my PC for testing. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The problem is solved and the script successfully tested. Thanks for the help. And if Randall reads this: You probably can fool the BOT by using double encoded UTF at the comic name. But I believe the corresponding image URI wouldn't work. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Signature==&lt;br /&gt;
Oops, sorry for forgetting my signature in my comment on &amp;quot;1047: Approximations&amp;quot;, and thank you for adding it. [[User:Redbelly98|Redbelly98]] ([[User talk:Redbelly98|talk]]) 01:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome but there is absolutely no need to apologize. Errare humanum est. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 14:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elections ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding your new [[:Category:Elections|Category:Elections]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is it comics like this you wish to include? [[1130: Poll Watching]]? Guess anything Nate Silver is about it?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Just added [[500: Election]]... question is if election category is to be a subset of politics and that some politic comics that are &amp;quot;only&amp;quot; about election should then not also be directly in politic category? Sometimes there is more to it than election, but not really in the election comic for instance --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your work. I've written &amp;quot;...in politics or elsewhere&amp;quot; because I think it may belong not only to politics. &amp;quot;1130: Poll Watching&amp;quot; definitely belongs to this category, it's even politics. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 12:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanx. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanx for the tweeking and the signing of my entry in 2066.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 21:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Purge? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the main page, there's a line below the Latest Comic block that states &amp;quot;Is this out of date? Clicking here will fix that.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This link contains an action parameter value of &amp;quot;purge&amp;quot; in the URL.  Do you know what this actually does?  Is it somehow related to the caching system, or does it just force the main page to recheck the latest comic number?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just curious, as I thought it might be useful for refreshing the cache when investigating an issue like an updated image that isn't being shown immediately. Thanks for any insight! (Oops, forgot to sign my edit!) [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 17:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Purging affects only the cache at this Wiki but not at Cloudflare. A purged page here will produce a new hash and thus also the Cloudflare cache will be expired. You can do this at every page here by adding &amp;quot;?action=purge&amp;quot; to the end of the URL; or if there is already a parameter with a question mark it should be &amp;quot;&amp;amp;action=purge&amp;quot;. Nonetheless, editing a page and changing only one single character will have the same effect.&lt;br /&gt;
:For pictures this is different because there is a page for the image:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/File:reminders.png&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:and the image itself:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/images/2/2c/reminders.png&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:You can purge the first link because it's rendered through the PHP engine but the second link is just a static image and the Cloudflare cache assumes that this doesn't change often. This helps to keep the traffic at the Wiki server much lower. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 18:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Awesome and thorough answer! I appreciate you taking the time to explain it so well. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 18:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2003: Presidential_Succession==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the explanation for [[2003: Presidential_Succession]], I just noticed that a number of users have updated the &amp;quot;List of specific individuals&amp;quot; section based on events since the comic was published, even though the section heading states that the list is as of the date the comic was published. Specifically, someone removed Serena Williams from the list because of a loss in July 2018, someone removed a whole section on the Royal family (which might be appropriate, but I don't know for sure), and several users changed a number of government people as a result of election results in November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was going to try to revert each of the changes back to the original list ,but there are also changes that are probably appropriate in other areas of the explanation. Do you know of a way to revert only those changes that were not appropriate, while retaining others that are appropriate? [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 15:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I decided to just manually revert each change made that was not appropriate, so you can disregard my question. I also added '''bold''' highlighting to the text in the opening paragraph that the list is as of the date of the comic to let people know that they should not update the names based on later events. One of the edits was to remove members of the royal family from the list. I left those names off of the updated list, as that makes sense to me. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 17:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Many thanks for your work. The explanation always belongs to the date when the comic was published. Any further developments may be mentioned by that manner, but in general that's trivia because it doesn't explain the comic itself in it's context. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1732: Earth_Temperature_Timeline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, hate to bug you again, but I have an odd question about [[1732:_Earth_Temperature_Timeline]] and its comic image, which is 740 × 14,889 in size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This past week, when I viewed this comic, the image was not displaying, and it wouldn't display even when I clicked on the image file link on the image page (the thumbnail was OK though).  I was getting what I thought was a server error instead, and the problem was clearly not due to something in the explanation page.  I thought maybe something was wrong with the image file, but I was able to download it and open it in my local image viewer program. I was considering what I might be able to do to resolve the issue, but not knowing why it wasn't opening, I put it off...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, now it's working fine again on the comic page, and I'm not sure what to make of the previous problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen similar issues like this in the past? Any thoughts on what might have caused it? I considered whether it might be helpful to actually split the image into separate slices and add them to the comic with some slider effect to view just a slice at a time, but I thought that might be too much effort for a wiki environment.  Any thoughts? [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 05:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please copy and paste the server error message or do a screen shot. But maybe it was just a local problem with your browser. Other comic images still did work? And click on the navigation title to see the original at the xkcd site. It also has the huge image directly embedded, thus I think we also should do so. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Protection from antisemitic troll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, good thing to short-term protect the new pages. However at the same time someone with the account truth revealer has registered... also still on other posts back and forth editing (with antisemitic content from IP-users) happens: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2120:_Brain_Hemispheres&amp;amp;curid=21799&amp;amp;diff=170762&amp;amp;oldid=170760 is it possible to also block for stuff like that? like slowing down the capabilities to do multiple edits for IP-users? --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 16:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a bad solution because many - sometimes even most - editors are just IPs. This action today is just a signal to that vandal. Further older discussions are here: [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests#SOON_THE_TRUTH_WILL_BE_REVEALED|Admin requests at the Community portal]]. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 16:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==DgbrtBOT failed 2019-08-30==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Dgbrt. The bot failed yesterday on [[2196: Nice To E-Meet You]]. Have you noticed it? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It began working again at [[2252: Parenthetical Names]]. So 56 comics or about 19 weeks of downtime...? Did you fix it? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It was not continuesly down from August onward. It started again right on 2nd September: [[2197: Game Show]] and did work until Friday, 13th December: [[2241: Brussels Sprouts Mandela Effect]] (maybe it is supersitious about Friday the 13th?) - [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/DgbrtBOT&amp;amp;target=DgbrtBOT see contributions page of the bot] --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 09:36, 10 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible problem with the PHP installation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dgbrt, I had an exchange of posts on the SlashMe talk page because that is the only administrator with any Wiki contributions shown in 2020 (for example you were in March 2019 and Jeff in April 2019).  SlashMe confirmed the problem I identified but had no solution, and suggested that I reach out to you. The exchange is copied below. --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Really really difficult to get to the What If? page in the Wiki ===&lt;br /&gt;
The name of the page is '''what if?''' but if you make an internal link the usual way, as here: [[what if?|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[what if?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]], you get a mostly blank page with the message ''No input file specified''. It would appear that page names with a question mark break something.  The failed form is what is used on the disambiguation page [[What If|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[What If]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]], and so following the page link from there fails.  What does work is this internal link: [[whatif|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatif]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]], but when you get there and click what links here, that fails as described above.  If you really really want to get to the what links here page for the what if? page, you have to use an external link, as [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere?target=what_if%3F&amp;amp;namespace%3D|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere?target=what_if%3F&amp;amp;namespace%3D]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;].  But but but.  On all those pages that it says link to the what if? page, the links are broken as described above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion is that the way to fix at this problem is to rename the what if? page to have no question mark, and then to visit all the pages in the old linked to list and update their links to the new page name.  Ugh.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 22:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have looked a little bit into it and it seems to be a configuration issue with the PHP installation. However, I don't have a definite solution for that and even if I had, I don't have access to the server and wouldn't be able to change it. I think [[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] has. Try reaching out to him. --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One more data point.  The redirect page [[whatif|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatif]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]] redirects using the [[what if?|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[what if?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]] syntax that fails every place else, but when redirecting it actually works.  Go figure. --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for maintaining the bot! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw in today's incomplete tag that you mentioned no one ever thanks you.  I just wanted to thank you for maintaining it.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 15:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2324:_Old_Days_2&amp;diff=193820</id>
		<title>Talk:2324: Old Days 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2324:_Old_Days_2&amp;diff=193820"/>
				<updated>2020-06-24T23:44:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've gotta try that, see how the ice cream truck guy reacts.  Wonder where I can find an ice cream truck though? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.71.16|172.69.71.16]] 23:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The above is me, wasn't logged in, would I get in trouble for fixing the signature? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 23:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2324:_Old_Days_2&amp;diff=193819</id>
		<title>Talk:2324: Old Days 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2324:_Old_Days_2&amp;diff=193819"/>
				<updated>2020-06-24T23:44:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've gotta try that, see how the ice cream truck guy reacts.  Wonder where I can find an ice cream truck though? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.71.16|172.69.71.16]] 23:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The above is me, wasn't logged in, would I get in trouble for fixing the signature?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2309:_X&amp;diff=192338</id>
		<title>2309: X</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2309:_X&amp;diff=192338"/>
				<updated>2020-05-21T11:27:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2309&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 20, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = X&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The worst is when you run out of monospaced fonts and have to use variable-width variables.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a COMIC SANS X AND A NEW PROGRAMMER. This page needs an expanded explanation of what esoteric languages are. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] has developed a new {{w|programming language}} with novel syntax. These languages are classified as {{w|esoteric language}}s, which are programming languages developed for no practical use (although that doesn't stop people from trying) other than novelty. The classic example of these are {{w|INTERCAL}} and {{w|brainfuck}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normally, there is no law against developing bad programming languages or bad code (although some would argue there should be). The law often has to play catch-up with technology. However, as with the example of Cueball and the EPA, and Cueball with tech support problems, it seems that the Government has made an exemption in this case, possibly because the result is so egregious as to cause real harm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A {{w|Variable (computer science)|variable}} is a piece of data (such as an integer or a string of text) that can change in value. Variables can usually be named any string of alphanumeric characters. For the sake of readability, variables are usually named something relevant to what the variable represents. For example, a variable counting how many seconds have passed since the program was launched might be called elapsedTime. Some programmers, particularly if they are working under time pressure, will give their variables names (such as 'x') that do not describe what they do, and are thus almost completely meaningless. This is considered bad coding practice, because anyone reading the code who is not familiar with it will not understand what the variable does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here, Cueball is developing a language where the only way to differentiate variables is to write the letter &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; in different fonts. Typically, code is written in plain text without a way to specify a font, which would mean that Cueball has implemented a lot more processing in the {{w|compiler}} or {{w|Integrated development environment|IDE}} in a fashion typically seen as unconventional. This 'feature' would be a nightmare to program with, as all of the variables would look very similar unless careful attention is being paid, and there would be little to no way to determine what each one does, since font names are typically not particularly descriptive. Additionally, the fact that some fonts look similar (such as Arial and Helvetica) would require the programmer to have an intricate knowledge of different fonts and how to distinguish them from only one letter.  Programs would also be difficult to edit if two programmers do not have the same fonts installed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is also a jab at mathematicians who are in addition to using variable names which are short and nondescript (e.g. &amp;quot;x&amp;quot;), are also &amp;quot;typeface sensitive&amp;quot; (in addition to case sensitive). In other words, one can typically find a statement involving three different &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; variables, referring to three different objects, and they are distinguished by their font and case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text references the fact that most IDEs use a monospaced font (i.e. one where every character is the same width), as opposed to variable-width fonts, in which some characters like 'I' are narrower than others. This is partly because fixed horizontal alignment is sometimes useful when dealing with certain text strings. 'Variable-width variables' refers to the fact that the letter X, like all letters, has different widths in different fonts. This would make this fixed alignment almost impossible, thus creating yet another reason why Cueball's language would be highly unpleasant to use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball holds a laptop with code visible on the screen.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I've developed a new programming language!&lt;br /&gt;
:Offpanel voice: Didn't a judge order you to stop doing that?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In a frameless panel, Cueball holds the laptop with one hand and types on the keyboard.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Higher court threw out the ruling!&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I'm back, suckers!&lt;br /&gt;
:Offpanel voice: ''Dammit.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball holds the folded down laptop at his side.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: But I promise it's good this time!&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Just normal code. Good clean syntax. Nothing weird.&lt;br /&gt;
:Offpanel voice: Okay...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball holds the laptop at his side, and raises a finger on his other hand.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Except the only variable name is &amp;quot;X&amp;quot;. To refer to different variables you have to write &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; in different fonts.&lt;br /&gt;
:Offpanel voice: I'm calling the court.&lt;br /&gt;
:Another offpanel voice: Maybe we can appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Programming]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2309:_X&amp;diff=192337</id>
		<title>Talk:2309: X</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2309:_X&amp;diff=192337"/>
				<updated>2020-05-21T11:22:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
id certainly use that language lol ([[User talk:172.69.70.101|172.69.70.101]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- haXkell is a X-based dialect of haskell&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; :: Integer -&amp;gt; Integer&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 0 = 1&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; X = X * &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; (X-1)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 02:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://esolangs.org/wiki/X isn't taken. --[[User:Blacksilver|Blacksilver]] ([[User talk:Blacksilver|talk]]) 02:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some unique looking variable names would be X and x in the fonts Webdings, Wingdings, Wingdings 2, and Wingdings 3.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They are respectively as follows:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Webdings';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Webdings';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings 2';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings 2';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings 3';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: 'Wingdings 3';&amp;quot;&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; --[[User:Dstrube|Dstrube]] ([[User talk:Dstrube|talk]]) 02:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:This comment is quite uninformative to someone who doesn't have those fonts installed. [[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: This comment highlights another issue with Cueball's language.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 11:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As well as esolangs, among which I would consider the likes of Whitespace and b****fuck as potential inspirations, I think I'm also minded of TempleOS and its creator as vaguer but possibly still related influences... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.163|162.158.158.163]] 03:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added an explanation of what a variable is and why it's bad to have every one named X. It's pretty rudimentary though, hope someone more experienced than me will improve it. [[User:Unpopular Opinions|Goodbye, world!]] ([[User talk:Unpopular Opinions|talk]]) 04:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Forth basically doesn't use variable names.  Commands operate on and consume the last number mentioned.  A Forth program &amp;quot;1 2 3 . . .&amp;quot; prints 3, then 2, then 1.  &amp;quot;2 3 + .&amp;quot; prints 5 I think??&lt;br /&gt;
:In Microsoft &amp;quot;Transact-SQL&amp;quot; you can script variables named starting @ and temporary objects starting #.  I promise I try to resist naming objects @ or # and especially if @ or # is going to be a different object in each program...  or is not.  And if someone else needs to reads this (and I don't want to punish them).  Not to mention &amp;quot;@ &amp;quot; for instance.  Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@gmail.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.54|141.101.98.54]] 09:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Psh you're all chicken. Chicken chicken chicken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/677507038607048704/706860858587873310/ShapeLikeItSelf_img1.png?width=282&amp;amp;height=209 Language where you can have return keyword in a if condition]],&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/677507038607048704/712914169774735441/unknown.png?width=292&amp;amp;height=103 Language that uses unicode symbols for built_in operators]],&lt;br /&gt;
[[https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/677507038607048704/712915431446282240/unknown.png?width=396&amp;amp;height=379 Language, I have no words to describe]],&lt;br /&gt;
and this this '''X''' thing is winning so far...&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.139|162.158.89.139]] 06:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, but C++ does that shit either '''unintentionally''' or '''at user demand''' (although, to be clear, I'm not saying it's any good; C++ and Java are possibly the worst programming languages in terms of shoddy design). The X programming language is just the designer being an asshole. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.205|172.68.189.205]] 07:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Those links have nothing to do with C++/Java and you can Not do those things in C++ or Java (except an if in an assignment).[[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.208|162.158.92.208]] 08:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those look like pretty sane language features; just looks weird because of the Eliza effect; those keywords don't behave like you'd expect them to based on experience of other languages. In the first example, you can certainly do that in Perl using &amp;quot;if (defined wantarray)&amp;quot;; it's just unusual (but comprehensible) to name the keyword &amp;quot;return&amp;quot;. What language is that? [[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Language is called ShapedLikeItSelf, but it currently has no runner. Documentation is just of images like these on discord server.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[https://discord.gg/ercPss9 This is link to it]] if you are intersted. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.19|162.158.89.19]] 10:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did Randall refer to this comic? https://xkcd.com/1537/&lt;br /&gt;
I vaguely remember another one about an esoteric language. Is there a category of programming languages on explainxkcd?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one that tried fiddling the CSS on the page to see if the X would change? Spoiler -&amp;gt; It didn't. [[User:Xseo|Xseo]] ([[User talk:Xseo|talk]]) 08:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If X is the only variable name, can it be omitted? For example, writing a single-argument function name in a different font to imply which X should be treated as its argument. And that gets me wondering how the source is stored; will the IDE allow use of fonts not installed on your system? Will the compiler fail if it can't find the font, requiring you to track down all of the fonts a developer used in order to compile their code? And what would be the legality of mixing open-source code and proprietary fonts? [[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;… and array indices start at 8, because anything smaller than that would be unreadable.&amp;quot; [[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 10:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2308:_Mount_St._Helens&amp;diff=192216</id>
		<title>Talk:2308: Mount St. Helens</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2308:_Mount_St._Helens&amp;diff=192216"/>
				<updated>2020-05-19T08:54:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect the wiggles in all the hand-drawn lines are actually more than the changes in height of the various mountains, and almost certainly not correlated to the actual changes in height, since this is all unknown. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 00:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic needs to be translated to non-retard units [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.212|162.158.155.212]] 07:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's pretty common to measure things in years.  And while measuring in 20 year gaps isn't normal, I wouldn't call it retarded, especially when they're probably chosen for a good visual spacing.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2283:_Exa-Exabyte&amp;diff=188941</id>
		<title>Talk:2283: Exa-Exabyte</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2283:_Exa-Exabyte&amp;diff=188941"/>
				<updated>2020-03-21T05:32:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: Forgot to sign&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is this the first non-coronavirus related comic after eight in a row? -- brad&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal suspicion is that this one came out so late in the day because Randall was trying to think up another coronavirus-related comic so as not to break his streak :) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.5|108.162.242.5]] 20:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We sure this is not covid-19 related? A comic revolving around how hard biology is doesn't seem to me like a definite chain breaker for a biology related topic. Though I'll admit its a bit of a stretch [[Special:Contributions/172.69.198.58|172.69.198.58]] 21:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure the comic is SARS-CoV-2 related. The virus genome can be found all over the internet lately, it is even used for spamming. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 21:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did someone already modified SARS-CoV-2 to be able to infect computers as well? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so,  is she counting all of humanity as one string of DNA data,  or does each human count separately,  or each cell in a human's body,  or what?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.215|162.158.74.215]] 21:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: According to the NYT article, it was calculating &amp;quot;number of cells contained in each organism and multiplied that by the amount of DNA contained in each cell&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.161|172.69.33.161]] 22:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: So, very small part of it would be each human cell counted separately. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'This is a comic about the difficulty of picturing or understanding large numbers. As mentioned in the comic, an exabyte is 10^18 bytes, while an &amp;quot;exa-exabyte&amp;quot; -- not a real word but one that makes sense if you apply the principles of metric prefixes'  One of the principles of metric prefixes (which can be found in the linked page) is 'Prefixes may not be used in combination.'  So &amp;quot;exa-exa&amp;quot; does not make sense in the metric world.  It only  makes &amp;quot;sense&amp;quot; in the messed up world were you lbf/lbm has the value 1 instead of g.[[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.138|172.68.65.138]] 01:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most the data is redundant though.  Compressed, and it definitely should be, it would take only about 2% as much space to store. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2283:_Exa-Exabyte&amp;diff=188940</id>
		<title>Talk:2283: Exa-Exabyte</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2283:_Exa-Exabyte&amp;diff=188940"/>
				<updated>2020-03-21T05:32:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is this the first non-coronavirus related comic after eight in a row? -- brad&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My personal suspicion is that this one came out so late in the day because Randall was trying to think up another coronavirus-related comic so as not to break his streak :) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.5|108.162.242.5]] 20:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We sure this is not covid-19 related? A comic revolving around how hard biology is doesn't seem to me like a definite chain breaker for a biology related topic. Though I'll admit its a bit of a stretch [[Special:Contributions/172.69.198.58|172.69.198.58]] 21:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure the comic is SARS-CoV-2 related. The virus genome can be found all over the internet lately, it is even used for spamming. [[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 21:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did someone already modified SARS-CoV-2 to be able to infect computers as well? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so,  is she counting all of humanity as one string of DNA data,  or does each human count separately,  or each cell in a human's body,  or what?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.215|162.158.74.215]] 21:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: According to the NYT article, it was calculating &amp;quot;number of cells contained in each organism and multiplied that by the amount of DNA contained in each cell&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.161|172.69.33.161]] 22:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: So, very small part of it would be each human cell counted separately. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'This is a comic about the difficulty of picturing or understanding large numbers. As mentioned in the comic, an exabyte is 10^18 bytes, while an &amp;quot;exa-exabyte&amp;quot; -- not a real word but one that makes sense if you apply the principles of metric prefixes'  One of the principles of metric prefixes (which can be found in the linked page) is 'Prefixes may not be used in combination.'  So &amp;quot;exa-exa&amp;quot; does not make sense in the metric world.  It only  makes &amp;quot;sense&amp;quot; in the messed up world were you lbf/lbm has the value 1 instead of g.[[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.138|172.68.65.138]] 01:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most the data is redundant though.  Compressed, and it definitely should be, it would take only about 2% as much space to store.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2254:_JPEG2000&amp;diff=185951</id>
		<title>Talk:2254: JPEG2000</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2254:_JPEG2000&amp;diff=185951"/>
				<updated>2020-01-14T05:11:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Cubeball's keyboard has disappeared in the third panel. 22:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure the woman in this comic should be called Hairbun. Updating transcript... [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 01:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jpeg2000 is widely used on archive.org (scans are stored as .jp2 there). For example, the image of this page [https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.215730/2015.215730.The-Theory#page/n99/mode/1up] is internally from a jp2.zip file:&lt;br /&gt;
https://ia601604.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/16/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.215730/2015.215730.The-Theory_jp2.zip&amp;amp;file=2015.215730.The-Theory_jp2/2015.215730.The-Theory_0099.jp2&lt;br /&gt;
where BookReaderImages.php seems to be able to read .jp2 in zip and send it to you as a legacy format your browser can handle.  [[User:Yosei|Yosei]] ([[User talk:Yosei|talk]]) 01:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if as a result of this comic, xkcd fans will cause rapid adoption.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2234:_How_To_Deliver_Christmas_Presents&amp;diff=183846</id>
		<title>Talk:2234: How To Deliver Christmas Presents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2234:_How_To_Deliver_Christmas_Presents&amp;diff=183846"/>
				<updated>2019-11-29T16:30:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the equation in the comic wrong? It should be (4 kg*m/s) / (book mass), right?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.245|108.162.221.245]] 19:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's correct. The equation in part 2 should be (speed) = (momentum) / (mass), given (momentum) = (speed) x (mass). Though the answer seems to be correct, assuming a book mass of approximately 0.8lbs (0.36kg). --shabegger {{unsigned|Shabegger}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Have added this to a [[#Trivia|trivia section]]. Maybe Randall will later update the comic, although it is probably cumbersome... But if he does, then that should go in the trivia and the mention of this that I made in the comic, should be changed to, there was an error... Feel free to improve my formulas. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that a &amp;quot;Baby Yoda&amp;quot; in the right window? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.6.94|172.69.6.94]] 20:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Houseplant [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 20:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope that is Pikachu, I'm certain. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also thought it looked like Yoda. In the 2x version, it looks most like a baby elephant, but careful examination suggests it's probably Pikachu in a ''really'' weird perspective (the thing that looks like Yoda's second ear is actually Pikachu's ''tail'', and his ''actual'' second ear is probably behind his head). --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.62|141.101.77.62]] 22:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree that it is rather difficult to see, but with Randall's use of Pikachu in the past, and the fact that I play Pokémon Go and instantly saw it as Pikachu, I'm quite convinced this is what it should be. Also Yoda do not exist on Earht, but everyone knows Pikachu does :p But can see the baby elephant likeness and the other options as well. By the way, not everyone knows about the 2x version, so here is [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/how_to_deliver_christmas_presents_2x.png the link for that]. &lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Media:2234-_How_To_Deliver_Christmas_Presents_Pikachu_in_window.png|Close up of Pikachu in window]] --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I may not play Pokémon Go, but I know what a Pikachu looks like, and I don't see it. I'm not even sure which ear the other IP is talking about, or where its eyes and snout are. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.18.82|162.158.18.82]] 20:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It’s a gremlin, I’m certain of it. Looks like one, and Gremlins is a Christmas film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why the uptick in fireplaces around 2012/2013? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.242.166|172.68.242.166]] 02:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It snowed that year, maybe that's why? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 09:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic was posted the day before Thanksgiving, a major American holiday.  Can't be a coincidence can it? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 09:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also 2 days before black Friday, a even more major American holiday, and typical ocasion to get christmas gifts. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 10:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes also think it is Black Friday related. It is now people should think of buying it, as many buy their gifts tomorrow. I buy the way had just ordered the book 10 hours before this comic came came out. But had all along decided that I could wait for x-mas. So someone will give it to me... :-p So although i look forward to reading it, I could wait ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it might be notable how, in number 3, the gift explicitly becomes a book. There's no inherent reason--you could just put any gift in the same package as the other and get the same joke. [[User:Trlkly|Trlkly]] ([[User talk:Trlkly|talk]]) 11:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course it's notable, it's the point of this comic.  [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 16:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;. . . the holiday of Christmas, which in the US happens usually on December 25 of each year.&amp;quot; Usually? No, I think Christmas in the US is always on December 25th, by law. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.136|162.158.214.136]] 12:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The beginning of the sentence is &amp;quot;Giving Christmas presents is a traditional way to celebrate ...&amp;quot; - so it referrs to the giving of presents, which usually happens on the 25th. There is no law defining the day you give christmas gifts.--[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC) Good rewrite . . . .[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.88|162.158.214.88]] 12:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2234:_How_To_Deliver_Christmas_Presents&amp;diff=183795</id>
		<title>Talk:2234: How To Deliver Christmas Presents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2234:_How_To_Deliver_Christmas_Presents&amp;diff=183795"/>
				<updated>2019-11-28T09:53:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the equation in the comic wrong? It should be (4 kg*m/s) / (book mass), right?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.245|108.162.221.245]] 19:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that's correct. The equation in part 2 should be (speed) = (momentum) / (mass), given (momentum) = (speed) x (mass). Though the answer seems to be correct, assuming a book mass of approximately 0.8lbs (0.36kg). --shabegger {{unsigned|Shabegger}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Have added this to a [[#Trivia|trivia section]]. Maybe Randall will later update the comic, although it is probably cumbersome... But if he does, then that should go in the trivia and the mention of this that I made in the comic, should be changed to, there was an error... Feel free to improve my formulas. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that a &amp;quot;Baby Yoda&amp;quot; in the right window? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.6.94|172.69.6.94]] 20:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Houseplant [[User:N0lqu|-boB]] ([[User talk:N0lqu|talk]]) 20:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nope that is Pikachu, I'm certain. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also thought it looked like Yoda. In the 2x version, it looks most like a baby elephant, but careful examination suggests it's probably Pikachu in a ''really'' weird perspective (the thing that looks like Yoda's second ear is actually Pikachu's ''tail'', and his ''actual'' second ear is probably behind his head). --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.77.62|141.101.77.62]] 22:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why the uptick in fireplaces around 2012/2013? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.242.166|172.68.242.166]] 02:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It snowed that year, maybe that's why? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 09:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic was posted the day before Thanksgiving, a major American holiday.  Can't be a coincidence can it? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 09:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137782</id>
		<title>1814: Color Pattern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137782"/>
				<updated>2017-03-23T18:37:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */ Yes, TV and com,puter screens are the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1814&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 22, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Color Pattern&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = color_pattern.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = ♫ When the spacing is tight / And the difference is slight / That&amp;amp;#39;s a moiré ♫&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete| Is the title text explanation correct?}}&lt;br /&gt;
The comic references {{w|moiré pattern}}s in a parody of the song {{w|That's Amore}} made famous by {{w|Dean Martin}} [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnoDb0bMQuk in 1953]. (See [[#Trivia|trivia]] for pronunciation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] complains that the photo he just took of his computer screen is covered in weird rainbow patterns (the color patterns from the title). In photography (or videography), a moiré pattern occurs when the image sensors are aligned in a pattern, while photographing something else that is also aligned in a pattern that's not 100% identically aligned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In mathematics, physics, and art, a moiré pattern or moiré fringes are large scale interference patterns that can be produced when an opaque ruled pattern with transparent gaps is overlaid on another similar pattern. For the moiré interference pattern to appear, the two patterns must not be completely identical in that they must be displaced, rotated, etc., or have different but similar pitch. A moiré pattern is a kind of {{w|aliasing}}. Moiré patterns appear in many different situations. In printing, the printed pattern of dots can negatively interfere with the image. In television and digital photography, a pattern on an object being photographed can interfere with the shape of the light sensors to generate unwanted {{w|artifact (error)|artifacts}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photographs of a digital screen taken with a digital camera often exhibit moiré patterns. Since both the screen and the digital camera use a scanning technique to produce or to capture pictures with horizontal scan lines, the conflicting sets of lines cause the moiré patterns. To avoid the effect, the digital camera can be aimed at an angle of 30 degrees to the screen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] replies with a song that explains that what Cueball sees is a moiré pattern. But she chooses to use the song ''That's Amore'', where &amp;quot;Amore&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; in Italian. The pun is that &amp;quot;That's a Moiré&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;That's Amore&amp;quot; are phonetically [[#Trivia|quite similar]]. Her explanation that it happens when a grid is misaligned with another behind fits well with the more detailed explanation above. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#The songs|The song]] has a second verse given in the title text, again with musical notes indicating that it should be song. More information on when moiré patterns occur is given here, indicating that the space between the grid lines should be small and the two grids should be almost identical, for the maximum moiré effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The songs===&lt;br /&gt;
The entire version of Megan's ([[Randall|Randall's]]) song is:&lt;br /&gt;
:When a grid's misaligned &lt;br /&gt;
:with another behind &lt;br /&gt;
:That's a moiré... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When the spacing is tight &lt;br /&gt;
:And the difference is slight&lt;br /&gt;
:That's a moiré &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two first verse in the  [http://www.metrolyrics.com/thats-amore-lyrics-dean-martin.html original song]:&lt;br /&gt;
:When a moon hits your eye &lt;br /&gt;
:like a big pizza pie&lt;br /&gt;
:That's amore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When the world seems to shine &lt;br /&gt;
:like you've had too much wine&lt;br /&gt;
:That's amore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A similar song based on the same pun was made by Craig Swanson in 1993 and can be found on his web comic [http://www.perspicuity.com/ Perspicuity] in this comic: [http://www.perspicuity.com/?lightbox=image_104h That's a Moiré]. His song text was: &lt;br /&gt;
:When new lines hit your eyes &lt;br /&gt;
:From two screen when they ply&lt;br /&gt;
:That's a Moire!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball holds up his smartphone in front of his laptop which stands in front of him on a desk. Megan is sitting in an armchair reading, facing away from Cueball. She is singing her reply, as indicated with four double musical notes around her two lines of text.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I took a picture of my computer screen—why is the photo covered in these weird rainbow patterns?&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''When a grid's misaligned with another behind''&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''That's a moiré...''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Pronunciation: &lt;br /&gt;
**Moiré ([http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/moire /ˈmwɑːreɪ/] - /mwɑˈreɪ/ - [http://www.dictionary.com/browse/moire- French:] [mwaˈʁe]) &lt;br /&gt;
**That's amore /ðæts aˈmɔːrɛ/. &lt;br /&gt;
**That's a moiré /ðæts ə ˈmwɑːreɪ/.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Smartphones]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Songs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137747</id>
		<title>Talk:1814: Color Pattern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1814:_Color_Pattern&amp;diff=137747"/>
				<updated>2017-03-23T10:24:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This link, note 1, may help whomever is going to be editing the comic explanation, I don't have time this morning.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moir%C3%A9_pattern] [[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 13:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did a quick google and copy/pasted from the Wikipedia page on Moiré patterns. [[User:Xseo|Xseo]] ([[User talk:Xseo|talk]]) 13:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a copyright infringement. The contents of Wikipedia are not in the {{w|public domain}}. When using text from Wikipedia anywhere, you must indicate the license (CC-BY-SA 3.0).--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.82|162.158.150.82]] 13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This is fine. Wikipedia text is licensed for re-use by anybody, provided the original is referenced; Xseo referenced the source material in his comment above, and an explicit link is given in the article; furthermore, this entire website is CC-BY-SA 3.0, as indicated in the footer on every page. [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't be the only one for whom the note emoji are not showing up.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see them either. I'm running Chrome 48 Portable. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.225|162.158.62.225]] 14:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Running Chrome 57, Chromium 53, and Firefox 52; the note emoji doesn't work on any of these (Linux Mint 17.3 64-bit).  I wonder why? [[User:Cosmogoblin|Cosmogoblin]] ([[User talk:Cosmogoblin|talk]]) 15:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Works for me, Firefox 52. Bring up the menu bar (Alt or F10), &amp;quot;View &amp;gt; Text Encoding &amp;gt; Unicode&amp;quot;. If you still don't see the notes, it may be an issue with the font settings. You could try to fiddle with  &amp;quot;Tools &amp;gt; Options &amp;gt; Content &amp;gt; Default Font&amp;quot;. Instead of using the menu, you can bring up &amp;quot;Options&amp;quot; by entering &amp;quot;about:preferences&amp;quot; in the address bar. If that doesn't work, you need professional help. ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.106|162.158.114.106]] 06:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Chrome 56 for Android, they display for me. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 10:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AFAIK moiree patterns would not show up on an image that have been *properly* sampled, such moiree patterns are IIRC a byproduct of poorly sampled digital images. See WP for &amp;quot;aliasing&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;digital sampling&amp;quot; for reference. My two cents... [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 14:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good Lord. 24 hours! If any of you guys are actual engineers you should be ashamed of yourselves! I am not an engineer, but I do know a a tiny bit about signal theory, hence the tip. But then again this just shows how cheap shit chinese gizmos proliferate. Quality just cost too much, haha! Just need the looks, not the brainz! Only the zombies loves them BRAINZZZZZ! hurr hurr. [[User:Todor|Todor]] ([[User talk:Todor|talk]]) 19:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::What are you trying to say with 24 hours. At this moment the comic has been up for 6 hours... If you think the explanation could be improved this is luckily a wiki, so you could just improve instead of rant ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Dean Martin version, which likely is the only version anyone younger than I has heard goes like this- When the moon hits your eye - &lt;br /&gt;
like a bigga pizza pie - &lt;br /&gt;
That's amore - - &lt;br /&gt;
When the world seems to shine - &lt;br /&gt;
like you've had too much wine - &lt;br /&gt;
That's amore [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 04:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: At first I thought Russell was alluding to [[wikipedia:Tom Lehrer|Tom Lehrer's]] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7VQFfusQJk &amp;quot;That's Mathematics&amp;quot;]. :D [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.106|162.158.114.106]] 06:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Amore&amp;quot; is pronounces as /aˈmɔːrɛ/ in Italian. The initial vowel is a clean open &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; and there's no final &amp;quot;ei&amp;quot; but rather a clean open &amp;quot;e&amp;quot;. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA_for_Italian (Not counting I am Italian myself!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I can't help myself, but... If it's swimming in the sea and it's long and slippery, that's a moray [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150|141.101.107.150]] 07:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: When it's sometimes quite slow but on average it goes, that's amor...tized&lt;br /&gt;
: If your alphabet soup is tied up like a sloop, that's a mored A&lt;br /&gt;
: (This nonsense definitely not by [[User:Quantum7|Quantum7]] ([[User talk:Quantum7|talk]]) 10:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC))&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1807:_Listening&amp;diff=136497</id>
		<title>1807: Listening</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1807:_Listening&amp;diff=136497"/>
				<updated>2017-03-06T23:57:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Trivia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1807&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 6, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Listening&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = listening.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Sure, you could just ask, but this also takes care of the host gift thing.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Do NOT remove this tag too fast. Maybe some more about security. Is this Star Trek like?}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic depicts [[Cueball]] and [[Ponytail]] welcoming [[Black Hat]] and [[Danish]] to their house. Black Hat immediately talks to {{w|Amazon Alexa}} to order two tons of {{w|creamed corn}}. This would be quite expensive, and the hosts would be charged because it was ordered on their {{w|Amazon Echo}} device. It would also be a serious inconvenience, as the purchase would be quite bulky, as well as useless (no one needs that much creamed corn {{Citation needed}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The caption claims that this is an effort to find systems recording conversations, such as Alexa or {{w|Google Home}}, to punish the hosts for having these open services active. However, this tactic may be flawed as you can choose to have a PIN to confirm the order. If Black Hat doesn't know their PIN this would not actually result in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may also be a lesson to turn off any voice-activated systems before having guests come over, so that the guests don't take advantage of it and get you to pay for something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text says that this takes care of the &amp;quot;host gift thing&amp;quot; where the guests are intended to make gift to the hosts. However, Black Hat is making the hosts pay for it, so it can be as expensive as he wants, thus making this yet another example of his being a [[classhole]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat and Danish entering Cueball and Ponytail's house.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Hello, welcome to our house!&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Thanks for inviting us!&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Alexa, order two tons of creamed corn.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Alexa, confirm purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the frame:]&lt;br /&gt;
:When visiting a new house, it's good to check whether they have an always-on device transmitting your conversations somewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Assuming a standard 14.75 oz can and Black Hat's order was in short tons the order would consist of 4348 cans. Consuming one per day it would last for approx. twelve years. But it's doubtful that the expiry date would be that long.&lt;br /&gt;
*In a recent [http://www.npr.org/2016/12/31/507670072/amazon-echo-murder-case-renews-privacy-questions-prompted-by-our-digital-footpri court case] authorities believed that an Amazon Echo may have recorded the identity of a murder suspect, leading to a debate about the privacy and safety implications of such devices.&lt;br /&gt;
*Another recent [http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/7/14200210/amazon-alexa-tech-news-anchor-order-dollhouse event] resulted in Alexa ordering several people unwanted doll houses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Danish]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1807:_Listening&amp;diff=136496</id>
		<title>1807: Listening</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1807:_Listening&amp;diff=136496"/>
				<updated>2017-03-06T23:56:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Trivia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1807&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 6, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Listening&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = listening.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Sure, you could just ask, but this also takes care of the host gift thing.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Do NOT remove this tag too fast. Maybe some more about security. Is this Star Trek like?}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic depicts [[Cueball]] and [[Ponytail]] welcoming [[Black Hat]] and [[Danish]] to their house. Black Hat immediately talks to {{w|Amazon Alexa}} to order two tons of {{w|creamed corn}}. This would be quite expensive, and the hosts would be charged because it was ordered on their {{w|Amazon Echo}} device. It would also be a serious inconvenience, as the purchase would be quite bulky, as well as useless (no one needs that much creamed corn {{Citation needed}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The caption claims that this is an effort to find systems recording conversations, such as Alexa or {{w|Google Home}}, to punish the hosts for having these open services active. However, this tactic may be flawed as you can choose to have a PIN to confirm the order. If Black Hat doesn't know their PIN this would not actually result in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may also be a lesson to turn off any voice-activated systems before having guests come over, so that the guests don't take advantage of it and get you to pay for something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text says that this takes care of the &amp;quot;host gift thing&amp;quot; where the guests are intended to make gift to the hosts. However, Black Hat is making the hosts pay for it, so it can be as expensive as he wants, thus making this yet another example of his being a [[classhole]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat and Danish entering Cueball and Ponytail's house.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Hello, welcome to our house!&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Thanks for inviting us!&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Alexa, order two tons of creamed corn.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Alexa, confirm purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the frame:]&lt;br /&gt;
:When visiting a new house, it's good to check whether they have an always-on device transmitting your conversations somewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Assuming a standard 14.75 oz can and Black Hat's order was in short tons the order would consist of 4348 cans. Consuming one per day it would last for approx. twelve years. But it's doubtful that the expiry date would be that long.&lt;br /&gt;
*In a recent [http://www.npr.org/2016/12/31/507670072/amazon-echo-murder-case-renews-privacy-questions-prompted-by-our-digital-footpri court case] authorities believed that an Amazon Echo may have recorded the identity of a murder suspect, leading to a debate about the privacy and safety implications of such devices.&lt;br /&gt;
*Another recent [http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/7/14200210/amazon-alexa-tech-news-anchor-order-dollhouse event] tilted in Alexa ordering several people unwanted doll houses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Danish]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rob&amp;diff=133551</id>
		<title>Rob</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rob&amp;diff=133551"/>
				<updated>2017-01-10T20:06:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox character&lt;br /&gt;
| image            = Rob.png&lt;br /&gt;
| caption          = A close-up of Rob from [[782: Desecration]]&lt;br /&gt;
| first_appearance = [[276: Fixed Width]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rob''' is a [[stick figure]] in xkcd. Rob has no identifying features and is a Cueball. In most cases, he seems to represent the same character, usually being portrayed as [[Black Hat|Black Hat's]] roommate. He is one of the few of [[Randall]]'s characters to be given a name. Rob is specifically named in [[276: Fixed Width]], [[632: Suspicion]], [[647: Scary]], [[716: Time Machine]], [[723: Seismic Waves]], [[782: Desecration]], [[838: Incident]], [[1102: Fastest-Growing]], [[1168: tar]], and [[1783: Emails]]. In [[276: Fixed Width]] his screen name appears as &amp;quot;rob&amp;quot;, and in [[723: Seismic Waves]] he is posting on the internet as &amp;quot;robm163&amp;quot;. In [[838: Incident]] his username appears as &amp;quot;robm&amp;quot;. In [[1783: Emails]], Cueball replies to his email in the title text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relationships==&lt;br /&gt;
Rob had a relationship with a &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; known as &amp;lt;emily&amp;gt; on IM. This ended tragically in [[276: Fixed Width]] when he told her the relationship was only for sex while he wasn't really paying attention to what he was writing; he just wanted their chat responses to line up nicely on the screen. Two years later, in 2009, he had a relationship of a few months with what ended up to be a spam bot. He discovered this when he asked the bot to pass a {{w|Turing test}}. This happened in [[632: Suspicion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[647: Scary]] we find that he has a nephew born after September 11, 2001, but by 2009 he was old enough to have discussions with Rob about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[1102: Fastest-Growing]] it seems that Rob is [[Black Hat|Black Hat's]] room mate. In fact, it's possible that within the xkcd continuity, every time we see Black Hat's roommate, it's Rob. But with no name mentioned it is not enough to list these comics as comics featuring Rob.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:Category:Comics featuring Rob]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
*It was at some point suggested that Cueball and Rob should be merged. But nothing came of the [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob discussion.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{navbox-characters}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1439:_Rack_Unit&amp;diff=132980</id>
		<title>Talk:1439: Rack Unit</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1439:_Rack_Unit&amp;diff=132980"/>
				<updated>2016-12-27T05:31:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: I'm one of today's 10,000&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Bzzzzz [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.202|108.162.250.202]] 04:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Bzz ZZ zz bz?! (What did you say about my mother?!) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.26|108.162.216.26]] 19:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Bzz, zzz bzzz bz. Bzz zz. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.202|108.162.250.202]] 23:30, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: bzbbzbbb bzzbbzbz bzzbzzbb bzzbzzbb bzzbzzzz bbzbbbbb bzzzbzbb bzzbzbbb bzzbbzbz bzzzbbzb bzzbbzbz [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 05:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air Bud has had multiple mentions in his comics, but I don't know all of them.  I also think it was mentioned in one of the What-If's.  I'll do a quick Google search to see if I can get at least one of them. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 06:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Mouse-over text in the final image. http://what-if.xkcd.com/111/  Still searching.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 06:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:http://xkcd.com/115/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.161|108.162.237.161]] 07:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic may be a reference to the highly hyped lack-rack https://wiki.eth0.nl/index.php/LackRack --[[User:Belibem|Belibem]] ([[User talk:Belibem|talk]]) 09:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's unlikely that this was intentional, but this comic is almost the same as this panel from MSPA: http://www.mspaintadventures.com/?s=6&amp;amp;p=003976 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.224|108.162.219.224]] 11:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure an apiarist might know whether there'd be a problem with air temperature (often chilled), on any bee colony.  And  with the lack of non-plastic internal flora, and almost certainly some quite severe filtration screens betwixt server environment and the outside world I can't see [i]any[/i] chance for nectar collection.  Of course, it's Black Hat, so he's probably worked around both of these (slotted in next to blade servers with consistently warming processors, and maybe a ready nectar supply.  But I stil feel for the poor bees, with all those whirring fans of all shapes and sizes, around and within the server room equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
(Also, perhaps interesting to note that apparently ''most'' colocatiopn TOSs don't mention beehives. So he found that ''some'' did...) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 12:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'd think that a more-or-less simple restriction on interference with other tenants and their equipment would be sufficient to proscribe Black-Hat from causing any issues with his bees (officially, at least), wouldn't it? So perhaps it's as simple as a TOS that only proscribes ''electromagnetic'' interference (maybe even touching equipment of other tenants), but nothing involving ''bees'' per se? -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 13:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lack of non-plastic flora might not be a problem, since honeybees are opportunists, and will gather any sugary liquid they can find. Someone once told me that the bees in the Smithsonian's observation hive made honey from what they found in discarded beverage containers left around the mall by human pedestrians. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 01:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does &amp;quot;similar pitches&amp;quot; in the comic mean? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.73|108.162.216.73]]&lt;br /&gt;
:not entirely sure about an industry-general term, but there is mention of &amp;quot;tile pitch&amp;quot; here: http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/energy-smart-containment-rack-deployment-guide-dell.pdf -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 14:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, here's something I [http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19088-01/v445.srvr/819-5730-10/rackmount.html found]: &amp;quot;Aisle pitch is the distance from the center of one cold aisle to the center of the next cold aisle either to the left or right. Data centers often use a seven-tile aisle pitch. This measurement allows two 2 x 2 foot (0.61 x 0.61 m) floor tiles in the cold aisle, 3 feet (0.9 m) in the hot aisle, and a 42-inch (1-m) allowance for the depth of the cabinet or rack.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:...and though it doesn't seem the term &amp;quot;pitch&amp;quot; is used in bee keeping that I can find, there are probably generally followed guidelines on spacing... http://www.tillysnest.com/2012/04/placement-of-beehives.html -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 14:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitch wikipedia] -- &amp;quot; &amp;quot;Pitch&amp;quot; is widely used to describe the distance between repeated elements in a structure possessing translational symmetry&amp;quot;.  This would include things like server racks (the distance from the bottom of one slot to the bottom of the next), beehives (the distance from one pane to the next).  You commonly hear it in relation to airline seats (&amp;quot;seat pitch&amp;quot; -- the distance from one seat to the next, as a measure of the relative comfort of airline seats) but it is a more general term. [[User:Vyzen|Vyzen]] ([[User talk:Vyzen|talk]]) 15:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Engineer here - The term pitch is used to describe the distance between repeating items. For example: The holes have a 10mm pitch = There is a hole every 10mm. I've added the pitch spec for server racks and beehives, which are not too dissimilar. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Without looking it up (sorry, feeling lazy), it occurs to me that the term pitch might ultimately have derived from screwthreads.  Pitching (especially when it comes to ships, and by extension air and space-craft) regards a sloping angle, and the angle of the thread dictates the linear distance between each circuit of the ridge/thread element.  This latter property is more handily measured than the perpendicular angle away from the pure tangent (assuming not multi-threaded, although that's rarer in nuts and bolts, etc, due to less inherent mechanical advantage), and so while the cutting may have been dictated by the angle (i.e. pitch), the definition quickly becomes standardised against the linear periodicity, and thus becomes used even in describing perfectly square measurements, such as screwholes in racking.  Just an idle thought.  That adds nothing to the discussion. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.112|141.101.99.112]] 21:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually, the pitch of the frames in a Langstroth hive is variable. Some beekeepers use ten frames to a super (box) and others use nine or eight, spacing them by eye. With too much space between frames, the bees tend to build bridge comb (a form of undesired &amp;quot;burr comb&amp;quot;) between frames, making it difficult to work the hive. Frames sometimes need to be taken out, mostly for inspection or honey harvesting. &amp;quot;Bee space&amp;quot; is a familiar concept to every modern beekeeper. Much less than 3/16&amp;quot; between components, and the bees will seal that space shut with bee glue, or propolis. Much more than 3/8&amp;quot; and they will fill the vacancy with wild comb, or burr comb. Spaces dimensioned between those limits are left clear for bees to move around in. I'm having fun imagining going into a server rack with a smoker and hive tool (a little pry bar to separate the supers and unglue the frames from their support.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Orienting the frames horizontally in a normally situated rack would be a deal-breaker, though. Honeycomb cells are built with their bases on a vertical foundation, with each cell having a slight upward tilt, on the order of 10° to 12°, so that the nectar doesn't fall out. The bees fan their wings to ventilate the hive, reducing the nectar's water content and increasing its viscosity, but they also manage the ventilation to maintain a certain warmth around the brood comb. At that temperature, honey flows pretty well. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 01:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: This is my first post in this wiki.  1.) the difference between 1.5&amp;quot; and 1.75&amp;quot; is enough to let an inserted object give the ~10 degrees necessary for the honey to not drip out.  2.) In the data center I'm familiar with the server blades were mounted vertically (Verari BladeRack 2) would vertically aligned boxes for for bee keeping?  [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.182|199.27.128.182]] 00:33, 2 November 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Langstroth_Frames.jpg Here is a picture] of a frame of honeycomb lifted out of a super. In the beekeeper's right hand you can see the bit of extended top bar that rests on a rabbet in the top edge of the box. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Langstroth-nastavek.jpg Here is a picture] of what beekeepers call the woodware or bee furniture. That is what it looks like before the bees have used it and covered it with wax and propolis. That tan sheet in the lifted frame is beeswax foundation, embossed with a hex pattern of worker-sized cells. As the bees draw comb out from both sides of that foundation, they instinctively give the cells their upward tilt. ([http://i.imgur.com/SUJQC.gif Here is an image] with the tilt angle exaggerated.) No need for a human to tilt the frame for them. You can see how the top bars in a beehive are horizontal, with the frames hanging vertically down from them. In the Verari box, the &amp;quot;top bar&amp;quot; of each blade is vertical. We might be able to work with that... read on:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Frames start out with their top bars resting on rabbets in the front and back walls of the super, which is a topless, bottomless box, one module of a beehive. As time goes on, the bees cover the inside surfaces of their nest with propolis, which sort of glues the frames into the box. The burr comb, that you can see on the top and bottom bars in the first picture, gets broken when the frame comes out. Honey-filled burr comb scraped off the top bar makes a nice snack, tucked under the veil on a sunny afternoon. The yellow thing in that first picture looks like the handle of a hive tool, used to scrape off unwanted bits of comb, pry the frames loose, and get some finger room under the ends for lifting. When the frames go back in, it's just gravity holding them in place. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abeilles_et_ruches_19.JPG This picture] shows some bridge comb between frames. A careful stab with the hive tool will cut that, so it doesn't tear as the frame comes out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Slotting and unslotting a frame with its top bar oriented vertically would call for some dexterity. The need to secure the ears to the rack might call for an extra pair of hands. If the frame wiggled too much to one side or the other on its way in or out of the rack, some bees might get crushed... when that happens, they release an alarm pheromone (which smells like banana oil, or isoamyl acetate, familiar to shooters as Hoppe's #9 nitro solvent.) Other bees get &amp;quot;defensive&amp;quot; when they smell that, and come looking for animals to sting. When they get ''really'' grumpy, they launch straight for the face, which is why we wear veils made out of metal screen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Whew, that's enough typing for now. I will check in on this page now and then. If I've left anything unclear, ask away! [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 02:54, 2 November 2014 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for your insight, I found it very interesting. I never thought I would be learning about bees today! As far as the frame pitch, my research suggested that there wasn't any 'standard' pitch, but that 1.5&amp;quot; was fairly typical. I would certainly defer to your greater expertise if you feel the article needs editing.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 08:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do not know what resources Black Hat can command. I can only assume the racks were somehow turned on their sides, so the bees could work in their customary orientation with respect to gravity. Sensitive little darlings they are, and they smell nice. I've put a parenthesis in the explanation, more or less to that effect. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 00:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't bee suprised if this became of those 'reality imitates art' situations, and somebody goes and makes a beehive out of an old server cabinet. I'll just leave [http://www.ebay.com/itm/18U-SERVER-RACK-DATA-NETWORK-CABINET-19-INCH-600-W-x450-D-x-1000-H-NEW-/191337505928?pt=UK_Computing_Rackmount_Cabinets_Frames&amp;amp;hash=item2c8c9aa488 this eBay auction] here.... --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'd be cautious if I were to do this. This is one of those projects that could develop some serious bugs... {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.202}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is certainly related to the famous ant-farm-computer, Hex, invented by Terry Pratchett. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_(Discworld) Anthill Inside!] ::: [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.231|108.162.249.231]] 02:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That certainly is one way to run a honeypot.--[[User:Henke37|Henke37]] ([[User talk:Henke37|talk]]) 14:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I remember seeing an article a few years ago about a company planning to use sideways server racks for liquid immersion cooling.  I wonder if honey is electrically or thermally conductive... http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/18/1955238/Startups-Submerged-Servers-Could-Cut-Cooling-Costs [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.65|108.162.216.65]] 15:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Honey is a supersaturated sugar solution made from a much more dilute sugar solution, usually nectar. Not a lot of ionic species in the solution, so maybe slightly more electrically conductive than DI water. The transformation from nectar to honey involves controlled airflow, from bees fanning their wings while remaining stationary on a wood or wax substrate that they can hook their feet onto. Liquid coolant would not be compatible with that process, to say nothing of the air-breathing insects doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If the bees chose to draw comb on a foundation of active circuit board, the comb would act as thermal insulation, and would interfere with air flow around the hot semiconductors or their heat sinks. Data-center honey production would call for intense hive management to avoid issues like that. If the honey frames were not kept separate from the electronic blades, the frames would need to be pulled on a rotation on the order of four times daily, to check the electronic modules and scrape them off if needed. Interesting work, if you can get it. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.153|173.245.54.153]] 21:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many servers use hypervisors for virtualization. What's interesting is that there is a hypervisor called bhyve, pronounced as &amp;quot;beehive&amp;quot;. {{unsigned ip|103.22.201.128}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1738:_Moon_Shapes&amp;diff=127718</id>
		<title>Talk:1738: Moon Shapes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1738:_Moon_Shapes&amp;diff=127718"/>
				<updated>2016-09-26T08:08:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reflection of the nuclear war on [[1626|the sun's surface]]. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1437:_Higgs_Boson&amp;diff=127700</id>
		<title>1437: Higgs Boson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1437:_Higgs_Boson&amp;diff=127700"/>
				<updated>2016-09-25T20:00:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1437&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 22, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Higgs Boson&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = higgs_boson.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 'Can't you just use the LHC you already built to find it again?' 'We MAY have disassembled it to build a death ray.' 'Just one, though.' 'Nothing you should worry about.' 'The death isn't even very serious.'&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Candidate_Higgs_Events_in_ATLAS_and_CMS.png|thumb|upright=1.5|Candidate Higgs boson events from collisions between protons in the LHC. (from Wikimedia Commons)]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Image to the right is missing, either fix or remove}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] and [[Ponytail]] are applying for a large amount of grant money to find the {{w|Higgs boson}}. Under scrutiny, they have been forced to admit that they have &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; the particle which had been previously &amp;quot;found&amp;quot;. This is a humorous play on the term &amp;quot;finding&amp;quot; when applied to fundamental particles. The common usage means to discover or observe the existence of a class of particles, rather than to know the current location of an individual particle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Higgs boson'' is an {{w|elementary particle}} that is predicted by a physical model of the universe (the '{{w|Standard Model}}'). Observing evidence that Higgs bosons really exist is a key test of this model: if a search for the Higgs boson had failed to find evidence confirming its existence then the Standard Model would have been shown to be an incorrect description of reality. Finding the Higgs boson was one of the main reasons why the {{w|Large Hadron Collider}} (LHC) was built: to create energies high enough for the Higgs boson to become manifest. The point is, once evidence for its existence has been observed it is not possible to 'lose' the Higgs boson in a way implied by Cueball and Ponytail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the off-screen questioner wonders why Cueball and Ponytail can't use the LHC to find the particle again. The implication is that this would avoid spending another $3 billion. Their responses imply that the pair have already dismantled the LHC and converted its components into a {{w|death ray}} (a {{w|particle-beam weapon}} to be exact). The ostensibly reassuring platitudes offered mimic those used to placate those who were worried about possible apocalyptic consequences of commissioning the LHC, for instance the creation of {{w|black hole}}s, {{w|strange matter}}, a {{w|vacuum bubble}} or proton-eating {{w|magnetic monopole}}s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comment that &amp;quot;The death isn't even very serious&amp;quot; in the title text may be a reference to Isaac Asimov's &amp;quot;I, Robot.&amp;quot; Robopsychologist Dr. Susan Calvin tells supercomputer The Brain not to worry about death, that it wasn't a &amp;quot;big deal,&amp;quot; when the robot is working on an equation relating to hyper drive. The Brain was able to deliver the solution, since anyone using the hyperdrive would be briefly &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot; (no longer exist), but in the end, they would arrive safe and sound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also implies that the death ray was only able to produce one death, as opposed to the many deaths such a weapon could be expected to cause, just as it is implied that the LHC only produced a single Higgs boson, which was subsequently misplaced. In [[401: Large Hadron Collider]] the proton stream from the LHC was used to cause the eventual death of a helicopter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Offscreen: Tell us about your proposal.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: We're requesting $3 billion in funding to find the Higgs boson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Offscreen: ...wait. Didn't you already find it a year or two ago?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Yes, well, um.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: ...OK, this is embarrassing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: See, the thing is—&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Offscreen: Don't tell us you lost it already.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Look.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: In our defense, it's ''really'' small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1063:_Kill_Hitler&amp;diff=126252</id>
		<title>1063: Kill Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1063:_Kill_Hitler&amp;diff=126252"/>
				<updated>2016-09-06T11:13:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number = 1063&lt;br /&gt;
| date = June 1, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Kill Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
| image = kill_hitler.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Revised directive: It is forbidden for you to interfere with human history until you've at least taken a class on it.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] creates a one-use time machine. [[Cueball]] selects the most common suggestion for a time machine usage: killing {{w|Adolf Hitler}}. Black Hat finally relents and goes to kill Hitler. He returns, commenting that he found Hitler in a very noisy bunker in the year 1945. Cueball realizes to his dismay that Black Hat wasted his one and only opportunity by killing Hitler after his regime was already collapsing and Soviet troops were closing in on him, thus leaving the overall course of history unaltered from the normal timeline in which Hitler committed suicide to avoid capture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is typical Black Hat behavior, going out of his way just to troll people like Cueball, in this case deliberately ''not'' changing any history or avoiding any of the atrocities carried out by Nazi Germany. Though that might be for the best, since [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HitlersTimeTravelExemptionAct killing Hitler early might cause more problems than it would solve].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, there are conspiracy theories that Hitler was shot by someone other than himself. Also, if {{w|Novikov self-consistency principle}} is true, Hitler's suicide was interrupted by Black Hat in the first place, and Black Hat was merely going back in time to do the thing he already did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;BRB&amp;quot; is an abbreviation that stands for &amp;quot;be right back&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text also refers to the time travel theme from the {{w|Superman}} movie in which Jor-El states: &amp;quot;It is forbidden for you to interfere with human history&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* Hitler was also the subject of Black Hat's [debatable] [[29| first appearance]].&lt;br /&gt;
* In [[1617: Time Capsule]] [[Beret Guy]] has the same mission, but has instead &amp;quot;traveled&amp;quot; forward in time, and when he arrives Hitler is long dead...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat and Cueball stand in front of a double door, which bears the label 'TIME door'. Black Hat has his hands on his hips.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: I finished my time machine, but it's one-use only.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: You ''gotta'' kill Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Black Hat, one hand palm upward.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Why are you so obsessed with this Hitler guy? We have ''all'' of ''time'' we could explore!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Cueball with both hands palm upward.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: He's evil incarnate! He murdered millions and sparked global war! ''Everyone'' agrees—if you get a time machine, you kill Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat enters the now open Time door as the other man looks on..]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: Fine, fine, I get it! Calm down. BRB, killing Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat returns and shuts the door, Cueball has outstretched arms.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: There. Done. Are you happy? &lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Thank'' you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: He was in some kind of bunker. 1945 was ''loud!''&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: '''''NO!'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time travel]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1729:_Migrating_Geese&amp;diff=126183</id>
		<title>Talk:1729: Migrating Geese</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1729:_Migrating_Geese&amp;diff=126183"/>
				<updated>2016-09-05T13:51:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Kevin sounds familiar, has he been in a previous xkcd? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 13:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1725:_Linear_Regression&amp;diff=125828</id>
		<title>Talk:1725: Linear Regression</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1725:_Linear_Regression&amp;diff=125828"/>
				<updated>2016-08-27T06:25:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Teapot */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Teapot ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also seems likely that the teapot refers to the Utah Teapot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_teapot).  It was one of the first complex 3D objects defined for CGI rendering, and has seen countless uses since.  Notably in the Pipes screensaver, and early SIGGRAPH papers where it was rendered along side the 5 platonic solids as if it belonged with them.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dkfenger|Dkfenger]] ([[User talk:Dkfenger|talk]]) 17:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm not sure I follow.  How do you reach that conclusion?  Given that the concept of constellations (and thus stars) is clearly shown in the comic, it seems much more likely to me that he was referring to Russell's Teapot and not to a computer rendering (if there was any reference at all).  The fact that that shape could abstractly resemble a teapot may be all that there is to it. :) [[User:KieferSkunk|KieferSkunk]] ([[User talk:KieferSkunk|talk]]) 18:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the teapot is a reference to the constellation Sagittarius. This seems most likely to me as the reference is to a constellation that looks like a teapot despite ostensibly being something else. Sagittarius is a constellation that is supposed to be an archer, but many people see it as a teapot instead. (http://www.space.com/30274-constellation-sagittarius-archer-dipper-teapot.html) [[User:Harperska|Harperska]] ([[User talk:Harperska|talk]]) 19:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it looks like a alcohol drink with the little umbrella sticking out. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 06:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on what is an R^2 value of 0.06 significant???  I'm removing that.  [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 20:59, 26 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Oops, misread it!  I read &amp;quot;insignificant&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;significant&amp;quot;. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 21:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125489</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125489"/>
				<updated>2016-08-18T20:12:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */ remove incomplete tag&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] announces he has &amp;quot;an exciting business opportunity to share&amp;quot;. After hearing discouragement from his off-panel audience, he promises that &amp;quot;this time it's a good one&amp;quot;, and goes on to explain his plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball's plan involves the premise that a small amount of {{w|Octane rating|premium gas}} is left in a fuel pump hose after a car driver fills their car up with premium gas. He states that even if the next customer only pays for regular {{w|Gasoline|gas}}, that they are still getting a small amount of the expensive premium gas.  Though he doesn't get a chance to finish the outline for his plan, one can assume he planned to get premium fuel at regular prices, so he could then sell it for profit. After hearing the first part of his plan, two people from the off-panel audience announce they are leaving, clearly and correctly thinking that Cueball's idea is stupid and impractical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, this would be an impossible business venture to execute. While in the United States often the same hose is used for the various octane fuels, the amount of fuel contained in the hose is relatively small (about [http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122944043385810527 a third of a gallon], or [http://www.metronews.ca/drive/2012/05/08/one-pump-three-grades-how-does-it-know.html half a liter]) compared to the amount that is generally purchased, though [http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122944043385810527 for motorcycles the ratio is more significant].  It is also illegal to resell fuel without the correct licenses, and it would be difficult, bordering on impossible, to have the fuel pump run to ''just'' the premium fuel out, and driving to each {{w|Filling station|gas station}} would use more money to buy more fuel than any money that could be made back. This is not to mention trying to keep track of when someone purchased premium so as to be the next person to use that pump to extract those precious drops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[1499: Arbitrage]] implies a similar plan to extract wealth out of a small market inefficiency that, in reality, would be far too onerous to exploit. See also the [[what if?]] ''{{what if|22|Cost of Pennies}}'' regarding why it would not be worth trying these kind of ventures out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is another one of Cueball's fuel-based business ventures, as he says he plans to dig up fuel stations underground fuel storage tanks, to then sell the contents of. Again, illegal/theft, impractical, don't try it (though it would be much more profitable than his previous plan). The punchline is that a gas station's underground tank is &amp;quot;inaccessible&amp;quot; from the outside, just as there are some oil deposits that are inaccessible to traditional oil production techniques because no sufficient natural flow towards a well can be obtained. In the case of oil deposits, high-pressure fluids are pumped into the rock to break it up (&amp;quot;{{w|Hydraulic fracturing}}&amp;quot; also known as &amp;quot;fracking&amp;quot;) and allow the oil to reach the well. Oil tanks, on the other hand, can be made accessible by puncturing them using (presumably) hydraulically powered tools (electrical power is inadvisable in the presence of high-vapor-pressure hydrocarbons due to the significant risk of fire and explosion caused by electrical sparking). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text of [[1662: Jack and Jill]] also refers to fracking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic originally shared name with [[827: My Business Idea]], which was then renamed. There were no other relations between the ideas for the two comics, see [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing next to a rolled down projector screen holding a hand up towards his off-panel audience, one from the audience speaks. It's is impossible to say if there are more than two persons off-panel, but it's also impossible to say if a person who speaks in one panel also speaks in one of the next, hence the numbering.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Thank you all for coming.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I have an exciting business opportunity to share.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #1: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on Cueball's head. An off-panel person speaks twice.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Now hear me out-&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #2: Your ideas are always the worst.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: No, no, this time it's a good one! I promise.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #2: Uh huh...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Front view of the screen with an image of a black gas pump, with the white hose snaking it's way up to the black handle. And arrow points to the middle of the hose where it is at it's highest point before the turn that goes to the handle. Cueball is pointing at the hose with a stick. Two different off-panel persons speaks to him.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: When someone fills their car with premium gas, some of it is left in the hose, and is dispensed to the next customer even if they've only paid for regular.  If we create a network of-&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #3: I'm leaving.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #4: Me too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Because this comic had the same title (and filename) as comic [[827: My Business Idea]], Randall inadvertently broke both xkcd.com and explainxkcd.com when it went up. &lt;br /&gt;
**The main xkcd.com site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd.com showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
**As of 11:35am UTC Randall has fixed this by renaming the old comic to [[827: My Business Idea]], which has now been implemented also here on xkcd.&lt;br /&gt;
*This is the third time Randall releases a comic with a [[:Category:Comics sharing name|name exactly the same]] as a previous comic. &lt;br /&gt;
**This is the first time the xkcd site broke, because the previous two had separate file names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics sharing name|Business Idea2]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125465</id>
		<title>Talk:1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125465"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T23:09:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* &amp;quot;Pay it forward&amp;quot; at Starbucks */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed as of 11:35 UTC, the old comic is now named &amp;quot;'''My''' Business Idea&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same person, just want to note the forum is a little behind. It was 11:35 according to Google, and the timestamp on the signature said 11:32. Posting this at 11:39 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ExplainXKCD is still showing the image for 827. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.62|173.245.52.62]] 14:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As far as I can tell, everything's been fixed now. I removed the warning in the incomplete tag. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.107|108.162.218.107]] 15:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there's been a naming overlap or something because https://xkcd.com/827/ and http://xkcd.com/1721/ are showing the same image&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.157|108.162.250.157]] 04:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall done goofed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accidentally named TWO comics &amp;quot;Business Idea&amp;quot;.  This one and comic 827 (https://xkcd.com/827/).  Because his comics are stored by name, not id, he has two &amp;quot;business_idea.png&amp;quot;s.  The newer replaced the older one, but explain-xkcd has the original, probably due to the way either one is stored.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm honestly surprised Randall would make a mistake like this. Like shouldn't he have a list and a script that automatically checks wether a title was already used? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.66|162.158.133.66]] 09:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or simply append/prepend the comic number to the image name, that way you can't have duplicates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should we do? Contact Randall? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Check the fora. Let him know he broke 827(http://i.imgur.com/0LTTpmJ.png) if he doesn't know already. I'm too lazy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.110|108.162.245.110]] 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Store it on the wiki as a jpeg and differentiate that way. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.89|173.245.48.89]] 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The older comic has now been renamed as &amp;quot;My Business Idea&amp;quot;, and is back up again. [[User:Zorlax the Mighty|Zorlax the Mighty&amp;amp;#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:Zorlax the Mighty|talk]]) 11:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great. I tried to fix the issue by renaming the old comic (both page and file), but it now has the old version cached and shows it on both comics' pages... --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 14:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation for us users from countries with different fueling systems ==&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany and many other countries, the gas pumps actually have a separate hose per fuel type, so many fans of xkcd might not be able to understand this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.162|162.158.83.162]] 05:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, because many of us use Diesel, and you should not mix diesel and petrol. But it's no problem to mix small quantities of regular into premium or vice versa. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.161|162.158.86.161]] 09:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not just diesel and petrol - every kind of fuel sold (usually 4 per pump - petrol/diesel x premium/regular, sometimes fast diesel pump for trucks instead of diesel premium) has a separate hose and pistol in Poland. You choose the fuel by choosing the pistol. I'm guessing it's the same in a large part of Europe at least. It didn't even occur to me that it could be done differently. I honestly thought it was part of the joke - that Cueball doesn't even know that. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm really surprised, too. How DOES a system work where the customer can presumably switch between the kinds of gas he fills in his tank? And where is such a system installed? The States, I suppose, but where else? For international readers, this should definitely be part of the explanation. Is there a convenient weblink that shows the differences between countries' gas stations, or a weblink that shows this unique setup that Randall takes for granted here? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.72|162.158.83.72]] 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beret Guy? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is this Cueball, or Beret Guy with his hat off? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Unlikely. Wasn't Beret Guy's hat stapled? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: If it was Beret Guy he most likely would have had (inexplicable) success with this idea. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 10:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Pay it forward&amp;quot; at Starbucks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually about Starbucks, where customers - depending on the place, of course, as I've never seen it in Switzerland - are asked to pay some bucks for the next customer. You are expected to pay something &amp;quot;forward&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This idea originates from Italy, where you can buy a &amp;quot;caffè sospeso&amp;quot;, a &amp;quot;suspended café&amp;quot;. Somebody in need can walk up to the bar tender and ask for a free coffee. And yes, it disgusts me that this good idea was taken over by hipsters.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.228|162.158.150.228]] 11:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you may be seeing something that is not in the comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.119|108.162.246.119]] 13:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know what you're talking about, and it usually happens with one spontaneous and kind person starting a chain reaction, not corporate encouragement. This would both go against your statement and the comic itself (as they both suggest the company intervening). {{unsigned|Papayaman1000}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fuel mixture quality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knowing about the oil industry myself and how oil is transported... different qualities of oil are separated by having different densities, however, some mixture where the two products are touching is unavoidable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is relevant because the non-premium gas actually has a certain amount of premium mixed in, and that's why the octane rating is a minimum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, oil companies already account for the mixing of qualities. {{unsigned ip|108.162.220.221}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125464</id>
		<title>Talk:1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125464"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T23:07:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed as of 11:35 UTC, the old comic is now named &amp;quot;'''My''' Business Idea&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same person, just want to note the forum is a little behind. It was 11:35 according to Google, and the timestamp on the signature said 11:32. Posting this at 11:39 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ExplainXKCD is still showing the image for 827. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.62|173.245.52.62]] 14:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As far as I can tell, everything's been fixed now. I removed the warning in the incomplete tag. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.107|108.162.218.107]] 15:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there's been a naming overlap or something because https://xkcd.com/827/ and http://xkcd.com/1721/ are showing the same image&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.157|108.162.250.157]] 04:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall done goofed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accidentally named TWO comics &amp;quot;Business Idea&amp;quot;.  This one and comic 827 (https://xkcd.com/827/).  Because his comics are stored by name, not id, he has two &amp;quot;business_idea.png&amp;quot;s.  The newer replaced the older one, but explain-xkcd has the original, probably due to the way either one is stored.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm honestly surprised Randall would make a mistake like this. Like shouldn't he have a list and a script that automatically checks wether a title was already used? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.66|162.158.133.66]] 09:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or simply append/prepend the comic number to the image name, that way you can't have duplicates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should we do? Contact Randall? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Check the fora. Let him know he broke 827(http://i.imgur.com/0LTTpmJ.png) if he doesn't know already. I'm too lazy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.110|108.162.245.110]] 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Store it on the wiki as a jpeg and differentiate that way. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.89|173.245.48.89]] 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The older comic has now been renamed as &amp;quot;My Business Idea&amp;quot;, and is back up again. [[User:Zorlax the Mighty|Zorlax the Mighty&amp;amp;#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:Zorlax the Mighty|talk]]) 11:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great. I tried to fix the issue by renaming the old comic (both page and file), but it now has the old version cached and shows it on both comics' pages... --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 14:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation for us users from countries with different fueling systems ==&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany and many other countries, the gas pumps actually have a separate hose per fuel type, so many fans of xkcd might not be able to understand this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.162|162.158.83.162]] 05:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, because many of us use Diesel, and you should not mix diesel and petrol. But it's no problem to mix small quantities of regular into premium or vice versa. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.161|162.158.86.161]] 09:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not just diesel and petrol - every kind of fuel sold (usually 4 per pump - petrol/diesel x premium/regular, sometimes fast diesel pump for trucks instead of diesel premium) has a separate hose and pistol in Poland. You choose the fuel by choosing the pistol. I'm guessing it's the same in a large part of Europe at least. It didn't even occur to me that it could be done differently. I honestly thought it was part of the joke - that Cueball doesn't even know that. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm really surprised, too. How DOES a system work where the customer can presumably switch between the kinds of gas he fills in his tank? And where is such a system installed? The States, I suppose, but where else? For international readers, this should definitely be part of the explanation. Is there a convenient weblink that shows the differences between countries' gas stations, or a weblink that shows this unique setup that Randall takes for granted here? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.72|162.158.83.72]] 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beret Guy? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is this Cueball, or Beret Guy with his hat off? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Unlikely. Wasn't Beret Guy's hat stapled? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: If it was Beret Guy he most likely would have had (inexplicable) success with this idea. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 10:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Pay it forward&amp;quot; at Starbucks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually about Starbucks, where customers - depending on the place, of course, as I've never seen it in Switzerland - are asked to pay some bucks for the next customer. You are expected to pay something &amp;quot;forward&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This idea originates from Italy, where you can buy a &amp;quot;caffè sospeso&amp;quot;, a &amp;quot;suspended café&amp;quot;. Somebody in need can walk up to the bar tender and ask for a free coffee. And yes, it disgusts me that this good idea was taken over by hipsters.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.228|162.158.150.228]] 11:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you may be seeing something that is not in the comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.119|108.162.246.119]] 13:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know what you're talking about, and it usually happens with one spontaneous and kind person starting a chain reaction, not corporate encouragement. This would both go against your statement and the comic itself (as they both suggest the company intervening).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fuel mixture quality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knowing about the oil industry myself and how oil is transported... different qualities of oil are separated by having different densities, however, some mixture where the two products are touching is unavoidable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is relevant because the non-premium gas actually has a certain amount of premium mixed in, and that's why the octane rating is a minimum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, oil companies already account for the mixing of qualities. {{unsigned ip|108.162.220.221}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125463</id>
		<title>Talk:1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125463"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T23:03:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Beret Guy? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixed as of 11:35 UTC, the old comic is now named &amp;quot;'''My''' Business Idea&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same person, just want to note the forum is a little behind. It was 11:35 according to Google, and the timestamp on the signature said 11:32. Posting this at 11:39 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.141|162.158.203.141]] 11:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ExplainXKCD is still showing the image for 827. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.62|173.245.52.62]] 14:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As far as I can tell, everything's been fixed now. I removed the warning in the incomplete tag. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.107|108.162.218.107]] 15:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there's been a naming overlap or something because https://xkcd.com/827/ and http://xkcd.com/1721/ are showing the same image&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.157|108.162.250.157]] 04:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So when I first read the strip, I thought there was snakes coming out of that gas station. Then, I thought the business idea was to replace gas in cars with snakes. This happen to anyone else? [[User:Jeudi Violist|Jeudi Violist]] ([[User talk:Jeudi Violist|talk]]) 22:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall done goofed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accidentally named TWO comics &amp;quot;Business Idea&amp;quot;.  This one and comic 827 (https://xkcd.com/827/).  Because his comics are stored by name, not id, he has two &amp;quot;business_idea.png&amp;quot;s.  The newer replaced the older one, but explain-xkcd has the original, probably due to the way either one is stored.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm honestly surprised Randall would make a mistake like this. Like shouldn't he have a list and a script that automatically checks wether a title was already used? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.66|162.158.133.66]] 09:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or simply append/prepend the comic number to the image name, that way you can't have duplicates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should we do? Contact Randall? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Check the fora. Let him know he broke 827(http://i.imgur.com/0LTTpmJ.png) if he doesn't know already. I'm too lazy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.110|108.162.245.110]] 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Store it on the wiki as a jpeg and differentiate that way. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.89|173.245.48.89]] 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The older comic has now been renamed as &amp;quot;My Business Idea&amp;quot;, and is back up again. [[User:Zorlax the Mighty|Zorlax the Mighty&amp;amp;#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:Zorlax the Mighty|talk]]) 11:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great. I tried to fix the issue by renaming the old comic (both page and file), but it now has the old version cached and shows it on both comics' pages... --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 14:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explanation for us users from countries with different fueling systems ==&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany and many other countries, the gas pumps actually have a separate hose per fuel type, so many fans of xkcd might not be able to understand this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.162|162.158.83.162]] 05:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, because many of us use Diesel, and you should not mix diesel and petrol. But it's no problem to mix small quantities of regular into premium or vice versa. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.161|162.158.86.161]] 09:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not just diesel and petrol - every kind of fuel sold (usually 4 per pump - petrol/diesel x premium/regular, sometimes fast diesel pump for trucks instead of diesel premium) has a separate hose and pistol in Poland. You choose the fuel by choosing the pistol. I'm guessing it's the same in a large part of Europe at least. It didn't even occur to me that it could be done differently. I honestly thought it was part of the joke - that Cueball doesn't even know that. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm really surprised, too. How DOES a system work where the customer can presumably switch between the kinds of gas he fills in his tank? And where is such a system installed? The States, I suppose, but where else? For international readers, this should definitely be part of the explanation. Is there a convenient weblink that shows the differences between countries' gas stations, or a weblink that shows this unique setup that Randall takes for granted here? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.72|162.158.83.72]] 10:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Beret Guy? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Is this Cueball, or Beret Guy with his hat off? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Unlikely. Wasn't Beret Guy's hat stapled? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 10:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Good point [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 23:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: If it was Beret Guy he most likely would have had (inexplicable) success with this idea. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 10:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Also good point [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 23:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Pay it forward&amp;quot; at Starbucks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is actually about Starbucks, where customers - depending on the place, of course, as I've never seen it in Switzerland - are asked to pay some bucks for the next customer. You are expected to pay something &amp;quot;forward&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This idea originates from Italy, where you can buy a &amp;quot;caffè sospeso&amp;quot;, a &amp;quot;suspended café&amp;quot;. Somebody in need can walk up to the bar tender and ask for a free coffee. And yes, it disgusts me that this good idea was taken over by hipsters.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.228|162.158.150.228]] 11:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you may be seeing something that is not in the comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.119|108.162.246.119]] 13:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know what you're talking about, and it usually happens with one spontaneous and kind person starting a chain reaction, not corporate encouragement. This would both go against your statement and the comic itself (as they both suggest the company intervening).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fuel mixture quality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knowing about the oil industry myself and how oil is transported... different qualities of oil are separated by having different densities, however, some mixture where the two products are touching is unavoidable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is relevant because the non-premium gas actually has a certain amount of premium mixed in, and that's why the octane rating is a minimum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, oil companies already account for the mixing of qualities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125462</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125462"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T23:01:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Trivia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|May require further editing to meet wiki standards}}&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Cueball]] announces he has &amp;quot;an exciting business opportunity to share&amp;quot;. After hearing discouragement from his off-panel audience, he promises that &amp;quot;this time it's a good one&amp;quot;, and goes on to explain his plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball's plan involves the premise that a small amount of {{w|Octane rating|premium gas}} is left in a fuel pump hose after a car driver fills their car up with premium gas. He states that even if the next customer only pays for regular {{w|Gasoline|gas}}, that they are still getting a small amount of the expensive premium gas.  Though he doesn't get a chance to finish the outline for his plan, one can assume he planned to get premium fuel at regular prices, so he could then sell it for profit. After hearing the first part of his plan, two people from the off-panel audience announce they are leaving, clearly and correctly thinking that Cueball's idea is stupid and impractical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, this would be an impossible business venture to execute. While in the United States often the same hose is used for the various octane fuels, the amount of fuel contained in the hose is relatively small (about [http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122944043385810527 a third of a gallon], or [http://www.metronews.ca/drive/2012/05/08/one-pump-three-grades-how-does-it-know.html half a liter])compared to the amount that is generally purchased, though [http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122944043385810527 for motorcycles the ratio is more significant].  It is also illegal to resell fuel without the correct licenses{{Citation needed}}, and it would be difficult, bordering on impossible, to have the fuel pump run to ''just'' the premium fuel out, and driving to each {{w|Filling station|gas station}} would use more money to buy more fuel than any money that could be made back. This is not to mention trying to keep track of when someone purchased premium so as to be the next person to use that pump to extract those precious drops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[1499: Arbitrage]] implies a similar plan to extract wealth out of a small market inefficiency that, in reality, would be far too onerous to exploit. See also the [[what if?]] ''{{what if|22|Cost of Pennies}}'' regarding why it would not be worth trying these kind of ventures out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is another one of Cueball's fuel-based business ventures, as he says he plans to dig up fuel stations underground fuel storage tanks, to then sell the contents of. Again, illegal/theft, impractical, don't try it (though it would be much more profitable than his previous plan). The punchline is that a gas station's underground tank is &amp;quot;inaccessible&amp;quot; from the outside, just as there are some oil deposits that are inaccessible to traditional oil production techniques because no sufficient natural flow towards a well can be obtained. In the case of oil deposits, high-pressure fluids are pumped into the rock to break it up (&amp;quot;{{w|Hydraulic fracturing}}&amp;quot; also known as &amp;quot;fracking&amp;quot;) and allow the oil to reach the well. Oil tanks, on the other hand, can be made accessible by puncturing them using (presumably) hydraulically powered tools (electrical power is inadvisable in the presence of high-vapor-pressure hydrocarbons due to the significant risk of fire and explosion caused by electrical sparking). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text of [[1662: Jack and Jill]] also refers to fracking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic originally shared name with [[827: My Business Idea]], which was then renamed. There were no other relations between the ideas for the two comics, see [[#Trivia|Trivia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is standing next to a rolled down projector screen holding a hand up towards his off-panel audience, one from the audience speaks. It's is impossible to say if there are more than two persons off-panel, but it's also impossible to say if a person who speaks in one panel also speaks in one of the next, hence the numbering.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Thank you all for coming.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I have an exciting business opportunity to share.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #1: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on Cueball's head. An off-panel person speaks twice.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Now hear me out-&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #2: Your ideas are always the worst.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: No, no, this time it's a good one! I promise.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #2: Uh huh...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Front view of the screen with an image of a black gas pump, with the white hose snaking it's way up to the black handle. And arrow points to the middle of the hose where it is at it's highest point before the turn that goes to the handle. Cueball is pointing at the hose with a stick. Two different off-panel persons speaks to him.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: When someone fills their car with premium gas, some of it is left in the hose, and is dispensed to the next customer even if they've only paid for regular.  If we create a network of-&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #3: I'm leaving.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-panel voice #4: Me too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*Because this comic had the same title (and filename) as comic [[827: My Business Idea]], Randall inadvertently broke both xkcd.com and explainxkcd.com when it went up. &lt;br /&gt;
**The main xkcd.com site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd.com showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
**As of 11:35am UTC Randall has fixed this by renaming the old comic to [[827: My Business Idea]], which has now been implemented also here on xkcd.&lt;br /&gt;
*This is the third time Randall releases a comic with a [[:Category:Comics sharing name|name exactly the same]] as a previous comic. &lt;br /&gt;
**This is the first time the xkcd site broke, because the previous two had separate file names.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics sharing name|Business Idea2]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125368</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125368"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:37:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea2.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, cueball proposes buying premium gas at cheaper prices, and presumably reselling later.  This would not be profitable as Cueball would sirens more driving to the gas stations whenever someone bought premium gas than we could get selling the premium gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Cueball purposes digging up the underground storage containers of gas and stealing them.  This could be very easily profitable.  It is also illegal and very obvious, and Cueball would quickly be caught trying to sell the gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* Because this comic has the same title (and filename) as comic [[827]], Randall inadvertently broke both his website and this one when it went up.  The main xkcd site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript| Not sure proper formatting.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[First panel]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball standing next to a board display, possibly a projector screen]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Thank you all for coming.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I have an exciting business opportunity to share.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off screen: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Second panel]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Now hear me out -&lt;br /&gt;
:Off screen: Your ideas are always the worst.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: No, no, this time it's a good one! I promise.&lt;br /&gt;
:Off screen: Uh Huh...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Third panel]&lt;br /&gt;
:[Display shows image of gas pump]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: When someone fills their car with premium gas, some of it is left in the hose, and is dispensed to the next customer even if they've only paid for regular.  If we create a network of-&lt;br /&gt;
:Off screen: I'm leaving.&lt;br /&gt;
:Someone else off screen: Me too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1543:_Team_Effort&amp;diff=125366</id>
		<title>Talk:1543: Team Effort</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1543:_Team_Effort&amp;diff=125366"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:29:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Bah, my first draft was conflicted yet again! Here's my draft - anyone feel free to re-merge any or part herein.&lt;br /&gt;
:When people receive a major award, like the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Awards|Academy Award] (or an &amp;quot;Oscar&amp;quot;), they give an acceptance speech which traditionally begins with the recipient thanking people who have helped them achieve the honour. Sometimes when a number of people are mentioned, the recipient will say that it was a team effort - a comment which elevates the &amp;quot;helpers&amp;quot; to virtually the same level as the recipient.&lt;br /&gt;
:This comic takes things one step further and attributes assistance in winning the award to a normal bodily function - the bacteria in short-haired-girls gut. This bacteria is largely what makes digestion possible, and without it she would die - and not be able to win the award.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jarod997|Jarod997]] ([[User talk:Jarod997|talk]]) 13:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please wait for the BOT [[User:dgbrtBOT|dgbrtBOT]] to create and edit all the necessary content here. So please wait for the BOT and edit only existing pages. Since xkcd is running in a cloud it can happen that my BOT sees updates later than you. So please be patient. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the scenario suggested (already tending towards a hypothetical quantification, and not regulated by a Weights And Measures authority), I'm not sure about either the accuracy ''or'' precision points currently in th explanation.  Randall/Megan may differ but, in my ''personal'' dialect, it's perfectly legitimate to say this for &amp;quot;one ''to'' two pints&amp;quot; with context suggesting whether this is some set (by whole/half/etc pints) or a continuity.  And rarely would it mean to six significant figures (it would be lower ''precision'', regardless of any implied discrete ''accuracy'').  The unvoiced error-margins in precision around a pint and a couple of pints (although not invoked here, see also [[1070]]!) could quite eaily overlap, in this scenario, to smudge even the 'set of two' together, and to either side.  IMO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I immediately saw (probably wrongly) an echo of recent strips [[1541]] and [[1528]], among others, with the scenario of a singled corpus being shared and thus influenced (willingly or otherwise!) by multiple entities.  (If apparently-Randall does any more along these lines... well, maybe ''he'''s trying to tell us something!)   [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.30|141.101.98.30]] 16:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if this sticks; I'm testing people to see how well they can negotiate contextual common sense when critically applied to neurotic debate over minutia. Regarding: the explanation in the 15:40 27 June 2015 revision, even though it has been edited out, but because there's a fascinating bit of didactic assertion that doesn't appear to pay heed to standard practice in speaking, and a full postmodern style deconstruction is something I'm in a ridiculously misplaced mood to go about doing. In the interest of being needlessly pedantic in an anonymous online discussion, I feel it sensible to point out that &amp;quot;one to two&amp;quot; (of something) to indicate a continuously differentiable value range, is rarely if ever used in colloquial English, (especially when the something in question, here being &amp;quot;pints&amp;quot; which is almost always referring to fluid volume, is readily divisible and not necessarily allotted in integer amounts.) In spoken English, the parsing &amp;quot;[x amount] to [y amount],&amp;quot; is usually only utilized when those amounts differ by greater than one. For example, &amp;quot;ideally we would have a team of four to eight people working on this project.&amp;quot; One might use the phrase, &amp;quot;I would like it if two or three people could help me move this couch,&amp;quot; to mean ''exactly'' two or ''exactly'' three people, and it scans this way primarily because people, as a unit of measurement, cannot be sensibly subdivided. Contrarily, when the parsing &amp;quot;[n] or [n+1]&amp;quot; is coupled to a unit that is readily divisible, common usage will scan to most speakers in a way that could more precisely be stated as, &amp;quot;a range centered on [n+0.5] [units] with a standard deviation slightly greater than [1 unit].&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example I might say, &amp;quot;there are like, three or four dozen geese over there,&amp;quot; and I would be daft to expect someone to interpret that to mean, &amp;quot;I estimate there are exactly 36 or exactly 48 geese over there,&amp;quot; but have every expectation that most people might (however generally) hear that to mean something close to, &amp;quot;I have made a quick ballpark estimate of between 36 and 48 geese from my imprecise observations, and would not be surprised if the exactly value were as low as 32 or as high as 52.&amp;quot; (I cannot rapidly count geese in quantities larger than about a dozen, and for each additional dozen of geese beyond the first, I expect my ability to make rapid estimations, in the same span of time it would otherwise take me to count a dozen geese, quickly deteriorates with at best a linear increase in margin of error and likely much worse than that. Which is to say, if I am able to wholly observe a number of geese (such that they are all within my field of view and none are obstructed by obstacles or other geese) between, say, 50 and 200, any estimates made in the same amount of time it would take me to individually count up to twelve of those geese, would probably be faulty to an order of several dozen geese. I don't know to what particular extent this is true; it would be a curious thing to test. I do however anticipate that a similar faultiness of measurement would exist for the average person estimating fluid volumes in the range of whole pints, especially in non-standard containers (for example, the human gut.))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of this is further supported by the syntactical parsing of Megan's statement. The stated value distribution, &amp;quot;one or two pints,&amp;quot; is immediately preceded by, &amp;quot;I mean, there's like.&amp;quot; The phrase, &amp;quot;there's like,&amp;quot; concisely indicates a vague or hasty approximation will follow, while the preamble, &amp;quot;I mean,&amp;quot; has become trendy in informal speech to prime listeners for upcoming dialogue with a tone indicative of range of qualifiers potentially including personal bias, wide margins of error, unsubstantiated or inflated sense of certainty, but overall a sense that exacting precision will be less semantically relevant to the content than the relational posturing of the salient concepts. In a tautological sense, this is quite literally stated; &amp;quot;I mean,&amp;quot; clearly indicates that what one will be explicating on has to do directly with meaning, rather than measurement, hypothetical abstraction or inquisitive positing, vague social hints, or any of a range of things one might attempt to convey linguistically. The listener is then ready to grapple with Megan's summary, &amp;quot;their cells outnumber mine,&amp;quot; in a way that directs their apprehension to the contextual significance of the phrase, rather than the isolated absolute value of it. This allows the listener to link the practical value of the whole sentence to the preceding one. Since Megan opens by thanking a list of people which could be seen as comprising individuals, it makes sense to interpret the second sentence as denoting a significance in the sum of bacteria as individuals, and that there is a remarkable (hence her remarking on it) meaning in the concept of there being more ''individual'' bacteria encompassed within Megan's person than she has in total ''parts'' (for some interpretations of the concept of &amp;quot;parts.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The summary conceptual meaning of Megan's statements (punctuated entirely by the concise notion of &amp;quot;team effort,&amp;quot;) renders fully moot any utility in determining the precise volume of bacteria, and urges the use of the most efficient uttering possible to indicate the volume without being wholly arbitrary; whatever the exact amount, it is likely to be within an order of magnitude of a pint, a pint is an intuitively imaginable (and for many beer drinkers and Ben and Jerry's ice cream eaters, personally poignant) volumetric unit of measurement, a pint of anything that is usually functionally invisible has immediate sensational potency, and that all amounts to a very large number of bacteria and indicates little if anything important about how much of a space that number of bacteria fit into. (How Randall came up with a volume figure for gut bacteria is beyond me; any quick searches I've done seem to indicate information about bacteria in terms of quantity or weight, and conversions to volume seem tremendously speculative and subject to conditional factors.) 10:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC) {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nature.com/news/scientists-bust-myth-that-our-bodies-have-more-bacteria-than-human-cells-1.19136 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.76|108.162.237.76]] 02:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125365</id>
		<title>Talk:1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125365"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:22:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there's been a naming overlap or something because https://xkcd.com/827/ and http://xkcd.com/1721/ are showing the same image&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.157|108.162.250.157]] 04:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall done goofed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accidentally named TWO comics &amp;quot;Business Idea&amp;quot;.  This one and comic 827 (https://xkcd.com/827/).  Because his comics are stored by name, not id, he has two &amp;quot;business_idea.png&amp;quot;s.  The newer replaced the older one, but explain-xkcd has the original, probably due to the way either one is stored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should we do? Contact Randall? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Check the fora. Let him know he broke 827(http://i.imgur.com/0LTTpmJ.png) if he doesn't know already. I'm too lazy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.110|108.162.245.110]] 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Store it on the wiki as a jpeg and differentiate that way. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.89|173.245.48.89]] 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany and many other countries, the gas pumps actually have a separate hose per fuel type, so many fans of xkcd might not be able to understand this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.162|162.158.83.162]] 05:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this Cueball, or Beret Guy with his hat off? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125364</id>
		<title>Talk:1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125364"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:21:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: Added signature and fixed reply chain&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there's been a naming overlap or something because https://xkcd.com/827/ and http://xkcd.com/1721/ are showing the same image&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.157|108.162.250.157]] 04:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall done goofed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accidentally named TWO comics &amp;quot;Business Idea&amp;quot;.  This one and comic 827 (https://xkcd.com/827/).  Because his comics are stored by name, not id, he has two &amp;quot;business_idea.png&amp;quot;s.  The newer replaced the older one, but explain-xkcd has the original, probably due to the way either one is stored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should we do? Contact Randall? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Check the fora. Let him know he broke 827(http://i.imgur.com/0LTTpmJ.png) if he doesn't know already. I'm too lazy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.110|108.162.245.110]] 04:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Store it on the wiki as a jpeg and differentiate that way. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.89|173.245.48.89]] 04:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Germany and many other countries, the gas pumps actually have a separate hose per fuel type, so many fans of xkcd might not be able to understand this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.162|162.158.83.162]] 05:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=125363</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=125363"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:15:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Business Plan category */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community portal}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add unexplained strips ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment, browsing through the explanations using the previous and next buttons is interrupted whenever there's an explanation missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think adding a page with the strip fr all of those with a short message like &amp;quot;no one has explained this yet, want to give it a shot?&amp;quot; would make the wiki easier to browse through and will get more strips explained faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think that would happen. If suddenly it was much easier for people to skip over pages that had no explanation, I think they would do exactly that, skip right over it. On the same side of that coin, If suddenly there are no longer any red links on the [[List of all comics]] then everyone perusing that page assumes that all the comics have been explained and don't need to contribute any more. It's astonishing how quickly an [[589: Designated Drivers|embedded]] red link gets an explanation page created simply to get rid of the red link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondarily, ''many'' of the pages created recently aren't being created with their numerical and titular redirects. Without the numerical redirect, the comic template can't find that there is a previous/next comic to link to. Every once in a while somebody will go through and try to notice all the pages that don't have their redirects created but it's an unscientific process that only happens occasionally. If we could get every joe blow that comes in and vomits up a poorly done explanation to create the redirects I wouldn't be quite as annoyed at their lack of show-don't-tell-manship. But, since they can't be bothered to put the date in the comic template, I doubt we'll ever get people to create the redirects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''TL;DR:''' No more red links, no more work gets done on the back catalog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  14:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== xplainkcd.com ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I first saw this site I thought it should definitely be at xplainkcd.com or at least redirect from that url {{unsigned|115.166.22.158|12:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like that idea! --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 13:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah! If it's possible, it would be cool! At least as a redirect. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not technically the same thing, but I just took [http://expxkcd.com http://expxkcd.com]. More explanation &amp;lt;del&amp;gt;is&amp;lt;/del&amp;gt; was given on the website itself. {{User:Grep/signature|05:10, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
::We do that with explainxkcd.com as well, but yay shorter URLs! Mind if I use that for our social media links? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I had no idea that you did that, but sure, go ahead! If you want, I can change any DNS records if you wish to have it go directly to you guys. {{User:Grep/signature|07:16, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::In case you were wondering, I just did the following: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;^/([0-9]+)(/large)?/?$&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; {{User:Grep/signature|07:25, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hrm. We're just matching with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;^(\d+)/?$&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. You can keep ownership of the URL if you want, unless you have traffic concerns or whatever and you want us to handle it, which we're very capable of doing. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have made http://www.xkcd.ga and http://www.xkcd.tk both forward to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Is this ok? [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Section style and usage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here and I'm trying to get up to speed with the culture. I have a few questions about how and where to use sections (== this ==). I am more willing to go with (and enforce) whatever norms there are here, but I have not seen them actually discussed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# '''Is it OK to create sections in Discussion pages?''' I have been told no, but there are many examples extant of this usage in this Wiki and indeed in Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
# '''Section title case''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#Acronyms Wikipedia's style guide] recommends sentence case, not title case. There are many title cased section headers here. &lt;br /&gt;
# '''Links''' I do not have a reference for this but it seems to me putting links in section code (== [[&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;this&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] == ) is bad form. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last note -- it's understood if these bylaws have not yet been written. I can see that a few of you have made a huge personal investment to make this Wiki what it is today, and that is a credit to you all -- this is awesome! As a long-time aficionado of xkcd I applaud your work and look forward to further collaboration.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Smartin|Smartin]] ([[User talk:Smartin|talk]]) 04:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a general rule, we stick to the standard format that existing pages follow, with an optional trivia section below the transcript. Some zealous editors like to add other sections though, which tend to be for the most part unneeded or redundant. If something you want to add doesn't help to explain the comic in some way, but the inclusion of which would somehow still add to the page, *and* it doesn't fall under the trivia category, a new section is warranted. This isn't the case most of the time though, so editors usually fold the content of extraneous sections into &amp;quot;Explanation&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Trivia.&amp;quot; We have no policy on links in titles, and they're allowed so long as they are appropriate; the link is useful and can't be folded into the section itself. And we use title case for titles cuz it just makes sense. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We generally do not (or at least, discourage) use sections on the talk/discussion pages for explanation pages. This is purely for looks. The comic discussion section of the explanation page looks/feels wrong if there are level 2 section breaks in the transclusion. Also, if the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Table_of_contents Table of Contents] starts showing up on a page, such as on [[Click and Drag]] the sections created on the talk page also show up in the TOC. This gets confusing, and this is why we prefer not to use them on explanation talk pages. Everywhere else we follow standard wiki format and do use sections on the discussion pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I think that links in section titles looks wrong, but I choose not to be the dictator of style in this matter. :p&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please feel free to make edits. The worst that happens is someone reverts your edit. If it's a big enough issue and/or you don't seem to be learning from what people are fixing about your edits someone will leave a comment on your talk page. That's it. We might leave a nasty-gram in the edit summary, but oh well. We only ban for malicious intent. Honestly working to better the wiki is good, even if sometimes we grumble about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  07:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I just looked at your talk page. I completely forgot that that happened. Don't worry about it. Learning the ropes is part of the experience. Do make edits, and if they're wrong, we'll nudge you in the right direction. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  07:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been moving some trivia sections to directly below the explanation, in order to make it more consistent, and easier to survey and maintain. Often the dividing line between trivia and explanation is not entirely clear, and in articles without a trivia section the end of the explanation very often contains trivia-like information. (e.g. [[1155: Kolmogorov Directions]]) -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
===Title case doesn't make any sense===&lt;br /&gt;
At first sight title case in titles just makes sense. However title case '''never''' makes sense. It's worse than all caps. Besides, only Americans and children like title case. [[Special:Contributions/190.96.48.48|190.96.48.48]] 20:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New character==&lt;br /&gt;
As per [[Talk:1178: Pickup Artists]], the character with hair has appeared in quite a few comics now, and he's starting to become a recurring character. Shall we go ahead with inaugurating him into our list of regular characters, and what name shall we assign him? Current candidate names include Hairy and Harry. Anyone? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like Harry :) --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 01:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cos made a point in the discussion on [[Talk:1178: Pickup Artists]] that Hairy is directly descriptive, whereas Harry is not obvious to visitors. On the other hand, not all names are descriptive ([[Danish]]) and I think this wiki is entitled to create some xkcd-in-culture, and not just describe. And Harry is quite funny.&lt;br /&gt;
::I wonder: has [[Randall]] ever called him anything at all in the transcript? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 21:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, he's not named in a any official transcripts, but he's already called Harry in quite a few comic explanations. Then again, I do like having a more descriptive name for him. Shall we hold this up to a vote? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think we should wait a little for a few more viewpoints to crop up. Also, can someone link to some more comics he's been featured in? I've got [[1028: Communication]], [[1027: Pickup Artist]] and [[1178: Pickup Artists]]. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 23:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I actually like what that anon said: ''Curly''.  Second choice: Hairy (being descriptive, a la Black Hat, Beret, Cueball, etc.)  While there's talk about in-culture, we've done that with the names Cueball, Beret, etc.  It's my opinion that the only names that should be &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; proper names are those that are named in the comic.  Megan, Miss Lenhart, etc.  Danish (as is discussed below) isn't truly a proper name, but you could argue it's a meta-description (one attributed by Black hat.)  So that's my vote: yes for '''Curly''' or '''Hairy''', no for Harry.  [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 05:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's right, [[Danish]] is not descriptive, but 1/ that name was suggested because the character [[515: No One Must Know|was called that way in the comic]], which is a tiny bit like a name given by the author (at least more than Harry which we have completely made up), and 2/ in that case it's hard to find a descriptive term: use something that revolves around her black hair (her only descriptive feature), and you easily mix up with [[Megan]]; the only graphical difference is that her hair is ''long'', but what kind of name can you make out of that?&lt;br /&gt;
:::For this new character, I suggest Hairy because it comes as the easy solution with every advantage: descriptive, easy to understand, and it's not ugly... I actually see no reason to resort to a made-up name like Harry.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 22:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Alright. So the discussion's been had, and the most oft recommended name appears to be Hairy. All in favor, say aye. If more than 1/3 of editors agree and we have more than 6 votes, Hairy it is.''' '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' [[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 06:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' to Hairy. [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. Harry would be a nice nod to the fact that he's actually hairy, but indeed it's better to avoid inside jokes. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. I'm convinced! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 17:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. Hairy. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 20:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hooray! We now have a [[:Category:Comics featuring Hairy]], with four pages already! Does anyone feel compelled to create &amp;quot;[[Hairy]]&amp;quot;, with a brief description and a nice profile pic like the other characters? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 22:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ambiguous characters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been thinking about the problem of the ambiguity of characters. &amp;quot;Is this really Cueball even though he has an eye and half a nose?&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;This is very likely ''not'' x.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Darnit, these arn't Cueballs, these are Randall and his friends!&amp;quot;, and so on. The character ambiguity is standard for xkcd (not less so in the early ones), and comes from the very loose or &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; way Randall uses his characters to be whatever he needs at the moment.  It's simply often impossible for us to know whether he had e.g. &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; or himself in mind, when drawing a particular comic (and I'd say: probably often both).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to suggest that we in general have a likewise rather loose policy towards including characters in the categories for the comics. So that reasonably ambiguous cases should be included in e.g. (does she have a ponytail?) This is not because I believe this or that to really be this or that; I just don't believe in objective truth (here!). I feel that when doing research :) on a character, the borderline cases are often the most interesting ones, and you want to be able to find them through the &amp;quot;Comics featuring miss x&amp;quot;!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I came to think this through now, when I wanted to (and did) list two comics with [[Miss Lenhart]] (?) where she was drawn but not named. Any thoughts on this in general? Other case studies? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 21:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My take has always been that [[Cueball]], for example, has not been a specific character.  There is not ''a'' cueball, per se, distinct from any other cueball... indeed, there are several comics with several cueballs in-frame, and that is the point.  I see the cueball character as a wildcard character (pun intended) ready to stand in for anybody (and ''not'' necessarily just Randall; I think those readers who suggest &amp;quot;this ''is'' Randall&amp;quot; are missing the point; he's way more META than that...)  [[Megan]], while slightly less generic, still remains the female wild-card significant-other, while Curls seems to be a not-significant-other female used to illustrate a relationship that is transient.  Other characters come and go, and when it's important to visually distinguish them from others in the frame, they're given additional characteristics, to wit [[Hairy]], [[Ponytail]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, that viewpoint is not commonly held, so I daresay I'm in the minority here.&lt;br /&gt;
:-- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 14:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Note at the top, about the server error ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''This thread was moved to [[MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've removed &amp;quot;add a comment!&amp;quot; from Discussion heading ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This does move it to above the line, and the rule stops early. Undo my change if that's more bothering than when the TOC is displayed as &amp;quot;add a comment!Discussion&amp;quot;... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how to automatically treat level 2 headers as level 3. That may be why Discussion was a level 1 heading earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually I now noticed there was a short edit war at {{tl|comic discussion}} over whether it should be a level 1 heading, just for this reason. [[User:Waldir]] seems to have conceeded... [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No edit war, hence no (intentional) concession. I reverted a change once, and didn't notice the change being re-implemented by another user. In any case, it is irrelevant now since we actively discourage using headers in talk pages precisely so that they don't display in the TOC for the main comic page, where the discussion page is transcluded to (see the discussion [[#Section style and usage|above]]). This might not scale well for comics that generate lots of discussion. It might be worth discussing our customs (and perhaps write them down somewhere) before performing such changes. What do others think? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time: The Table ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now on the page [[1190: Time]], we have a whole bunch of tables in the form image-time-hash. The tables take up heaps of vertical space and all have to be collapsed to even be remotely traversible. I propose that we aggregate all the images into one table after Time ends, like so:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable plainlinks table-padding&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Media:time.png|00:00]]||01/00:00||[[Media:time.png|10:00]]||01/10:00||[[Media:time.png|20:00]]||01/20:00||[[Media:time.png|30:00]]||AND MOAR SAMPLE DATAS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Media:time.png|00:30]]||01/00:30||[[Media:time.png|10:30]]||01/10:30||[[Media:time.png|20:30]]||01/20:30||[[Media:time.png|30:30]]||AND MOAR SAMPLE DATAS&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hash values aren't really a part of the comic, they're gibberish for the most part and they take up space that could be used to compact the table, as shown above. Even if we are conservative and make the table only five columns wide to account for smaller screens, we've divided scrolling time by five and eliminated much of the need for annoying collapsed tables and section headers for each day. Constructing the table shouldn't be particularly hard either, as all our current data is in nice regular tables with clear patterns that are easy enough to parse through. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm putting this here because the organization of the frame entries would be unintuitive and difficult to change from the edit window, which would make it a poor choice when we're still expanding it and don't even know how long the comic will continue for. It's merely a space-saving trick for after we're sure that the comic is over. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh and it'd be really nice if other people could also upload images if you're awake and a new one rolls by. There's gaps in the image record every time I wake up, and I dun likey. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good work so far; go ahead make it better! :) –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Featured Explanation, and Archival?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia has featured content. Now that we are close to reaching the goal of all comics explained, I think it makes more sense to have a &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; which would serve as a sort of a marker for a complete and good explanation. Many comics, and almost all charts are not fully explained/not a good quality explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We should set up archival of discussion of the most discussed pages, like this one. Its not very pleasing to see comments from July 2012 still lying around here. It becomes hectic at some point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just my 2 cents, feel free to discuss. Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/117.194.88.180|117.194.88.180]] 13:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We dedicate this wiki to explaining xkcd, and we do actually have a featured comic feature; it changes every week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and we usually manage to fill out the explanation for it within an hour or so of it going up. The most recent comic tends to be the one that most people visiting the wiki care about, so we give it prime space on the front page so they can find it easily. xkcd updates frequently enough that there isn't really that big of a time window for us to feature an article on our front page. Also, we're a volunteer project with quite a bit less manpower than Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
:We do need to archive talk pages though. Some of these are getting ridiculously long. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Davidy22. Archiving topics can be done by anyone, by moving resolved threads to the portal section's corresponding [[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals|talk page]]. We could start with the threads marked &amp;quot;✓ Closed&amp;quot;. [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason I asked for a &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; was because many of the comic explanations we currently have are sub-par, and we're almost at our initial goal of explaining all comics. A &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; would drive our editors towards the goal of having complete and good explanation towards all comics, and would allow us to know which explanations need elaboration.&lt;br /&gt;
:: P.S. My definition of complete explanation would be - To have a good explanation, To have all categories relevant, To link to any comics related and To explain any technical portions of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[Special:Contributions/117.194.82.49|117.194.82.49]] 07:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That message on the front page is going to link to all the pages marked by the incomplete template. If you find an unsatisfactory explanation, please mark it with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{incomplete}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: By my definition, I think all comics will be incomplete. An incomplete template will be focused more towards improving the worst explanations, while a featured one will be to improve the best ones. Since we already have the former, we should focus on the latter. Just my 2 cents. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.85.82|117.194.85.82]] 06:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Split the list of all comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[List of all comics]] is getting larger and larger, which makes it hard to read and hard to edit. How about splitting into parts, say [[List of all comics/1-1000]], [[List of all comics/1001-2000]], etc., or something to that effect? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Done. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.88.176|117.194.88.176]] 10:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Great job, thanks! [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And I've added back [[List of all comics (full)]], which allows, for example, listing all comics by alphabetical order.[[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 17:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidebar ads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Moved from [[Talk:Main Page]] –– [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are they generating significant money? The ones I see are pretty sleazy looking and/or scammy - &amp;quot;Power Companies Hate this Device! - click here to break the laws of thermodynamics!&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Debt relief program click here to lose more money&amp;quot;. How much  money are they generating? Can you set any selections to remove the sleazy ads?  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 18:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have sleazy sidebar ads? Since when? Thanks Google Chrome and AdBlock, I had no idea! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 07:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::People give 20$ a pop to get a bunch of clicks on explainxkcd, and Jeff uses that money to buy a faster server with a hard drive that doesn't have less space than a public toilet with an elephant in it. It'd be really nice if you didn't turn on adblock, the money is appreciated. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's a question of me not turning it off specifically every time I visit this site. More importantly, I do think people would be more likely to click the &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; if it weren't irrelevant ads around it. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 19:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Generating money is a great thing. Getting &amp;quot;20$ a pop to get a bunch of clicks&amp;quot; is a bit unclear. Do the ads only generate revenue when clicked on? So EXKCD only gets money when someone actually falls for the sleazy ads? I know lots of people do not like Google - but at least their adsense stuff is relevant to the content of the website, which might generate some legitimate traffic for a legitimate advertiser....  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 11:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Welllll, I didn't pick the ad supplier. You could bring it up with [[User talk:Jeff|Jeff]] if you want, I think he picked the ad provider on basis of which one had a mediawiki plugin or something. If you can link Jeff to a quick and easy way to put adsense on mediawiki, he should change it quickly enough. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I also gather then that they are only a temporary thing? -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Until we can buy a server that doesn't poop itself every time a new comic is released, the ads are staying. If you want them to go away sooner, throw more money at Jeff. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The ads are crap.  For sure.  Wish I didn't have to run them, but I don't trust donations alone to hold up continually some better hosting.  The ads really don't bring in that much $$$.  I had google adsense before, but Google shutdown my adsense account for unnamed reason after 1 week.  This new ad service is way sketchier.  If you all think they don't have a place here, I'll ax 'em. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Thanks for the info Jeff. How much ad money are we talking about? Is it calculated on how many ads are displayed or how many are clicked-through? How close to the goal is the server fund? How about a Kickstarter campaign for the server? $10 gets your name on a thankyou webpage or something like that. [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 17:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: It ain't much, last I looked it was $2 or $3 in 2 weeks.  I believe it is based on clicks, it is not nearly as clear as Google adsense.  I'm not really interested in doing a Kickstarter.  I think the donations will cover the initial start up, I just want to be able to cover the monthly costs as well. A few things are still up in the air. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Can you find a way to show the donations and ad income on the site, to make it transparent? ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: How about a donation amount that you'll take to turn it (the annoying unethical scummy ads) off for a year? Give me a dollar value and I might step up for the good of us all!  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 16:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic transparency ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is very important: How can we make the donations and ad-income transparent, so that we all can see when and how much money is coming in, and how far we are from reaching our goal? – [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 00:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds fine to me, I think I can put something together. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, may I bump this issue? Or maybe you have done something, and I missed it? Anyway, I would still appreciate it! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 17:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Numberssss. I'll get on with it, just need less homework and a few more numbers. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to respectfully file a complain. I find the banner advertisement of background checks distasteful. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 05:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] - I am the one who approved those ads.  But, since you have filed a complaint about them, I have gone ahead and removed them.  Thanks. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 12:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thank you. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 03:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in transcripts to improve accuracy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the transcripts, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[lines]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; are being changed to [lines] in order to avoid auto-linking. Why not just surround these with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tags and avoid the problem entirely? --[[User:Epauley|Epauley]] ([[User talk:Epauley|talk]]) 04:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Because it takes less time to type and single brackets are just as readable as double brackets to visitors. It's also a bit more readable in the editor. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Strip Title ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For someone who commonly browses explainxkcd in place of xkcd, and hence often see the strips for the first time here rather than the parent site, I find it somewhat odd that the 'Title Text' is so poorly displayed given how critical it can be to the strip.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that, while retaining the given name (perhaps moving it top left), the title text be enlarged and relocated to being over the strip as originally intended. {{unsigned ip|175.41.133.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
:The title text is placed very well at bottom of the image.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 07:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would have to agree with Dgbrt, it's placed nicely at the bottom, and there is no need for it to be moved. My reasoning is that you never actually read the title text first, you read it last. Making it &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;text-align: left;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does not make sense, because the image is centered (just like on xkcd.com). I also believe that there is no need for it to be re-sized, mainly due to the fact that it is slightly larger than the title text (for me, at least). {{User:Grep/signature|05:18, 08 September 2013}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Plus, if you hover over the image, it's the same as on xkcd.com {{User:Grep/signature|06:13, 08 September 2013}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I also agree with Dgbrt and Grep. The title text is kind of a bonus and should not be emphasized more than on the original page. On the original site you only see it before the image, if you have very slow internet access (or very fast eyes) --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sections in talk pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a reason why there are no sections in talk pages? It is not a very big deal, but especially for longer talk pages it would make editing be much handier, especially when using the preview function (not having to find the section every time). Also it automatically adds a description to the history (thus makes it more easy to look for certain edits, or decide by just looking at the [[Special:RecentChanges]], if a comment should concern you. --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:When discussion pages are transcluded by the comic discussion template, section headers carry over from talk pages and bad things happen. Using ; to denote headers instead of equals signs works well, and doesn't share transclusion pain. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any chance we can add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite/Cite.php cite.php] to this wiki? Most pages don't need it, but some comics take on a life of their own and being able to add reference tags would be really helpful for those. [[User:LadyMondegreen|LadyMondegreen]] ([[User talk:LadyMondegreen|talk]]) 01:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Cite has been added to the wiki.  Thanks for the suggestion! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 01:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stylized writing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understand that this wiki isn't as formal as wikipedia or sites like that but it seems that there are a few questionable practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The use of questions - when a non-rhetorical or unnecessary question is entered into the explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Extremely painted/biased view points - when there is obvious bias in the tone of the explanation of the contributor, in other &lt;br /&gt;
words; a lack of neutrality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Extreme repetition/rehashing - the explanation restates things and makes for a long and tedious read when a more straight-forward explanation is possible and clearer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The general informality - &amp;quot;This one's an easy one&amp;quot; &amp;quot;This is simple&amp;quot; &amp;quot;this one's straightforward&amp;quot; &amp;quot;You're an idiot for not understanding this one&amp;quot; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Many other practices that make the explanation hard to read, difficult to understand, or plain ugly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there are disparaging view points on how a comic should be explained, but please let's clean up the site a bit, acknowledge each view point and report on all of them and then tighten up the sloppy writing. Carry out arguments in the talk section, not the explanation. Perhaps we could first try to say the majority view point on the interpretation and then write the alternate explanations, of course this would bring up the debate on which is the majority explanation. Either way, more complete, logical explanations should be given more credence. --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with 2-5. 1, on the other hand, is sometimes useful and can contribute the to explanation, although 1 is still a very good point. I would say that you should edit it to have &amp;quot;arguments in the talk&amp;quot; be a 6th point as well. Unfortunately, though, we are not all logical, comic-understanding machines here, so minor deviations of these rules are still to be expected. But I think that overall, these are good rules, even if 2/3 are sort of part of 5.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]], please sign your post with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;float: right;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{User:Grep/signature|23:55, 22 October 2013}}&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand the use of questions in certain parts. And it was probably better to put the others as sub-categories to five but I wanted to show some common things that can be easily fixed. I know that some explanations require a lot of text and extensive research because of the abstract subjects Randall deals with and that it's difficult to be completely standardized but I think it would be good for us to try to come up with some general things to try to avoid to help the explanations &amp;quot;flow&amp;quot; --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Most of that isn't intentional, it's just an awful lot of labor to copy check all the explanations. I've been going through all the current articles and fixing consistency issues, the worst being wrong transcript/title text/dates and the most benign being wikilinks, spelling and trailing spaces. I'm at 682 so far, but my next pass will be on actual language and content, and it'll probably take longer. It takes a while though, and you can totally work on improving language in articles if you want to. Some explanations were pulled from the old blog, some were written and just got lost in the changelog. Copy editing everything we have so far is a very labor-intensive job, and the only way to really deal with it is to knuckle down and do it, or form a wikiproject and hope to heaven that visitors feel charitable enough to join in on it. I'd *probably* push to finish up all our incomplete articles first though, just because that's more directly related to the purpose of the site; tone and style probably comes second to having correct explanations. That doesn't mean you can't do it yourself, it's just that I'll probably only dedicate the subheader on the main page to one project at a time and our current biggest bugbear hasn't been solved yet. I could put up a sitenotice to see if that speeds the process up any. I'll do that when I get back home. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Easy redirect to comic? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been thinking, and there is one thing that would make navigating to the explained comics easier. My method of browsing is I'll see the comic on xkcd.com first, and if there is something curious about it that I don't quite understand, I'll come here. Sometimes it can be a bit troublesome, going to the homepage and then navigatiing to the right comic. Not too bad, but I'd like an easy way to go direct. So I was thinking, what if you had a redirect such that if you typed in, for example, www.explainxkcd.com/505, you would get redirected to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=505:_A_Bunch_of_Rocks. That would mean that you could get to the comic just from adding an &amp;quot;explain&amp;quot; to the start of the xkcd.com URL. I don't know if that is at all possible, but it would be pretty handy if it happened. Thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 03:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#Redirect_from_explainxkcd.com.2F1234 That's actually already on the to-do list.] I'm testing it right now and we should have it up soon. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Awesome :) [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 03:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whoop, forgot to mark this as complete. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:::: Done! Copy this and drag it to your bookmarks bar: |javascript: var url = document.URL; document.location = url.replace('xkcd.com','explainxkcd.com');| {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.29}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The feature requested here has also long since been implemented. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Increase support via prominent display of copyright and license for text submitted to explainxkcd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
XKCD itself is rather liberally licensed, and gets lots of good will from that.  As it says on the bottom of every page &amp;quot;This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.&amp;quot;  For details see [http://xkcd.com/license.html xkcd - A Webcomic - License].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I found nothing on most pages of explainxkcd about copyright or licensing, and it discouraged me from contributing or donating.  Finally, as I was writing this proposal up, I found a link on the editing page here: [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Copyrights explain xkcd:Copyrights - explain xkcd] saying that &amp;quot;''The Explain XKCD wiki is generally licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license (CC-BY-SA-3.0)''&amp;quot;.  That notice should be more prominent on the site, with at least a link on each page.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 15:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This should be mentioned at the main page, including a reference to the xkcd origin.&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW: NO DOUBLE SPACES after a sentence. Are you US guys still using a typewriter? It's not rendered at a web page and stupid like Gallons, Miles, Foots, and much more unique US behaviours. But that's just a joke beside.&lt;br /&gt;
:The licence hint is much more important, you are just correct.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Added a creative commons icon to the footer of the page, next to the powered by mediawiki button. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Comics Bot ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would there be need for such a thing?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.52|108.162.231.52]] Synthetica&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice idea, I never thought about that before. I will do some tests on existing comics to check if this could reduce the current number of error posts for a new article. When that is ready and working I will talk to some admins. My bot account [[User:DgbrtBOT|DgbrtBOT]] was originally intended for [[1190: Time]] picture uploads, but I never have used it because Time was over. Creating the new pages should be easy in general, avoiding errors will cost some more work. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you can get dgbrtBOT to do that, that'd help us an awful lot. It'd allow us to get rid of the ifexist cases in template:LATESTCOMIC as well, since the bot could change automatically that whenever a new comic goes up. It'll also help us get new comics down almost the moment they pop up, since the bot could sample several times a minute until a comic is posted. So long as it gets the general pattern right so that we have a correct page set up, we're good. An admin can come in sometime later to clean up categories and image urls and other piddly easy-to-fix details. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will work on this next weekend, just local scripts and no updates here. I also will talk about my results before any automatic updates will be activated. My first focus is on creating the new pages in the general pattern, LATESTCOMIC and also the page &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are maybe a bonus later. And of course all my scripts will be open source.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The first version is ready and I will test it at my local wiki. If everything goes well I could activate it for Wednesday (2013-11-13). LATESTCOMIC and &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are on my roadmap, but first I want produce correct new pages here. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:00, 10 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Righty ho. Here goes. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Even when my automatic local wiki test did fail today, just a damn wrong password, I will activate the bot here for Wednesday. It will only run from 4:00 PM until 8:00 PM UTC. You will not see my possible updates at [[Special:RecentChanges]] unless you click ''Show bots'' at the top of that page. LATESTCOMIC and &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are not covered, but this is at my TODO list until this test will be successful. Give me a '''GO''' or '''NO-GO''' for this test.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Easily a GO, I'll be ready to clean up if anything goes wrong. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So be ready on Wednesday for the clean up. My worst case is ''it simply does not work'', second worse scenario is still that I could delete some contend already posted here, but I'm trying to avoid this. ''Huston'', the countdown clock is counting. I'm joking about this because I really want to be confident about this ''BOT'' or ROBOT or uncontrolled action here.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The bot can't do anything that I can't reverse. I can even restore a backup from an hour before the bot's edits if it manages to break the database. How quickly does it poll xkcd, by the way? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First live test here (comic 1289). Please delete this page: [[Simple_Answers:_1289]]. Since my local wiki did not provide this templates I could not see this error before. In general the bot will update pages differ to any existing pages, but when it is not changed no update will happen. I'm fixing this errors at my script and do a second test here soon. I want to see it's producing correct pages until the bot will do it's work when I'm sleeping.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, test are done here, BOT is scheduled for the next update. Polling is every five minutes on Mon, Wed, and Fri from 04:00 until 08:00 UTC. Let's see how it will work.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Couldja ramp that up to once/twice a minute, push the start time back by an hour, and the end time by a few hours? Also, is it possible to terminate it once it finds a comic for a certain day? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It worked! Though it posted the comic 5 minutes past post time. We has technology now, we can afford to poll faster and closer, yeah? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Uhh, it worked... I will increase the polls when I'm more confident about the release times. Today it was approx. 05:00 UTC (GMT) or 01:00 EST (Randall's time zone). Looks like he is still at daylight saving time, would have been 00:00 EDT. The polls will be increased to one minute when I'm sure about the Standard Release Time (SRT). Next steps for the next update on Friday are:&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The LATESTCOMIC template.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The LATESTCOMIC template is included for the next run, it just simply has to return a number. But it's still the most critical part because if it does not work the Main Page is broken. I will change this to a better solution using that IFEXIST syntax soon. The list of all comics is still at my ToDo list. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The desired content of the LATESTCOMIC template should be just the comic number. If we can get out of having to poll multiple IFEXIST statements to find the latest comic, that would be a fantastic boon to our server performance. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK, it did work today so I will not change this. Next step is the list for all comics.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 11:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Next run will include an update on the &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; page. I'm crossing my fingers. When this update is also successful I will document my Bot at the Bot user page [[User:DgbrtBOT]]. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, I forgot this detail: The bot is starting at 00:00 EST (RLT - Randall local time), which is 04:00 UTC and 05:00 MET for me. It polls every 5 minutes until 23:55 MET (22:55 UTC, 18:55 RLT) the main page until a new comic is found. I do not poll the comic number because I want to avoid 404 message logs at the servers.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Something went wrong there. That's gonna need fixing. I am enjoying the looks of the apparently faster polling though. Maybe you could also set the start time to 00:00:05 EST to catch the on-time xkcd releases within ten seconds? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh, what a mess. I will do some more tests at my local wiki. At the next time I will do a check against the number from the LATESTCOMIC template, only the next number will be processed. The test against my local history did fail because of some cleanups after testings.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 08:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't like mess. So the BOT got many more checks before posting here but the bot was starting at 05:00 local time for me. I'm really asleep at that time. The mess here was covered, but I do need another GO for the next attempt. Otherwise I will just do a test to my local wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
No GO so far, my next test will run only at my local wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My script is here: [https://github.com/dgbrt/explainXKCD_update explainXKCD_update]. At my current test &amp;quot;explainxkcd.com&amp;quot; is commented out and &amp;quot;localhost&amp;quot; is active. Since I don't like mess and the bot does act while I am sleeping the next update must be done manually here. I'm hoping the bot will be ready for the next update on Friday.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bot is ready for Friday, everything went smooth at my last local test today. The bot did find the latest comic at 04:05 UTC and all essential pages were properly created. So I will activate it for this site again. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Bot did work as expected. So I name it release 1.1337, the next planed release will be 2.1337 (beta) because of this two issues:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Include any categories below this line.&amp;quot; will be removed because it doesn't make any sense any more.&lt;br /&gt;
*BETA: I want to use the full template features at [[List of all comics]], just ensuring that the pictures are working properly. No need for this at the most comics, but the BOT doesn't cover all possibilities on corrupt file names like we have had in &amp;quot;Pi vs. Tau&amp;quot;. The picture was without that dot. My bot just shows the real link it did upload here.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure we will have some issues on this bot, but for general pages it should work. So the bot will be active on Mon,Wed,Fri from 0:00 EST (or EDT) every five minutes until it did found a new comic, on success the bot does not poll any more.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Aww, it's a bot. It doesn't need to rest or take time off to do other stuff. It can totally poll once or more times per minute. Also, if you set the start time to a few seconds after midnight, Randall time, when he uploads a comic on-time, you'll get it within a few seconds as opposed to having to wait for the next polling. As for the image names, maybe you could convert spaces in the comic name to underscores, compare the two comic names you have and use that to decide which version of the template to use? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have to avoid that the bot is running twice, Internet Timeouts and more. And the comics are also published later sometimes. Look at my release [https://github.com/dgbrt/explainXKCD_update 1.1337], release 2.1337 will be later, Maybe I should start at 2 minutes after 0:00, but let's see right now how the bot does work. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Uhh, what a huge discussion here. The bot will get a major update soon: Scheduler does start it once and until a comic is found and uploaded it here or an other limit is reached (maybe the end of the day) the bot will poll by a small delay. But every poll is still an entire download from the main page, When a new comic is found bot stops.&lt;br /&gt;
:Why, you could use http://xkcd.com/info.0.json, right?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.52|108.162.231.52]] 07:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Synthetica&lt;br /&gt;
::The BOT performs perfect and I prefer to analyze the original page. A title text like the one from today (a text showing a link) will be covered in the future.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 10:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
A great enhancement would be also covering a new comic like 1190 Time was. I'm looking forward on this, some ideas, it does require a complete analyse of the page and then finding some strange content. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Require description for 'incomplete' tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to fix some of the incompletes, but several explanation pages I've come across are tagged incomplete without any reason given. The reason should be a required part of the tag. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.223|173.245.52.223]] 03:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This incomplete tags are just older than the recent change of that template. Current adds require a description, but it's not easy to figure out all that old reasons. If someone does find a reason, please just add it. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Should there be a subwiki to cover the shop links that appear above the comic?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current one (as of writing) is [http://imgs.xkcd.com/store_news/store_gd_b11_1ze4.png] but this is a different than the usual, and there was also a third in between these.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rsranger65|Rsranger65]] ([[User talk:Rsranger65|talk]]) 06:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those are very ephemeral. They aren't going to exist for very long, I don't know how valuable it would be to archive that stuff. We could probably do it, but having to figure out another naming convention and all for advertisements doesn't appeal to me at the current moment. If you can flesh it out, I'd love to see how you think we should do it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, I think we need a name for the character with a goatee and glasses in comics [[435: Purity]], [[796: Bad Ex]] and [[964: Dorm Poster]] as well as possibly others. Edit: oh and I suggest Goatee and Glasses Guy, but I'm open for suggestions Edit 2: also in [[826: Guest Week: Zach Weiner (SMBC)]] Halfhat {{unsigned|Halfhat}}&lt;br /&gt;
edit 3: Another sighting [[954: Chin-Up Bar]] [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: In the transcript, he is called &amp;quot;Person with Glasses and a Goatee&amp;quot; --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;quot;Glasses Guy&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Goatee Guy&amp;quot; are both probably descriptive enough! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I was thinking, maybe at some point we should do the comics in the ''What If?'' section, like [http://what-if.xkcd.com/imgs/a/36/cornstarch_bitcoins.png this one.] [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 20:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Start creating the pages for them! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think I can start creating one or two pages for What If, if that helps... [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 16:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: If nobody has any problem with it, I'm gonna give it a try later. :) [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 13:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought they were already pretty self-explanatory though. Also, how are we gonna organize and present them? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 16:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I totally agree with David: Read the entire What-If page and follow the links provided by Randall. No one of us can do that better in depth. But an overview page for this site is maybe not a bad idea, we just need a proper link here — a link at the main menu on the left. Translations to other languages are just another issue. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, I was thinking of an overview, summarizing the contents and discoveries of each what if page. Not to mention, we could also organize what if pages by categories, such as physics/love.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you like me to post here an example of what I would write? That way we can decide if it's worthy of creating an actual page. [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 12:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Adding pages for What If? posts would be very helpful. Although the articles themselves are obviously self-explanatory, there are almost as many subtle references, running gags, and in-jokes in What If? posts these days as in the comics themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
I often visit explain xkcd when I feel like I'm missing an inside joke or a pop culture reference in a comic, and it would be very helpful to many people (especially those from other cultures/subcultures) to have the same service.&lt;br /&gt;
For example, today's What If? contains multiple allusions to the Superman Movie, a running Citation Needed joke, and a whole comic that is a not-so-subtle dig at Elon Musk and the Hyperloop. It would be awesome if the community here at explainxkcd could tackle stuff like that.&lt;br /&gt;
Anonymous 20:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree. I don't understand the mouseover text on the first image in &amp;quot;Snow Removal&amp;quot;, for example. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 22:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole point of the transcripts is to have those who are unable to view images to still be able to read the comic, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then why is it required to stick to strictly official transcripts, where sometimes rewriting them slightly would make them flow better or otherwise get the ideas across better? I've tried rewriting a few, but they get reverted. I think that having easier-to-understand transcripts would be more important than strictly following official transcripts; what do you think? (For a few examples, see [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=207:_What_xkcd_Means&amp;amp;diff=60061&amp;amp;oldid=57400 this edit] and [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=995%3A_Coinstar&amp;amp;diff=59862&amp;amp;oldid=57316 this edit]. [[User:Zowayix|Zowayix]] ([[User talk:Zowayix|talk]]) 17:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We use the original transcript to try and deduce original author intent if it's unclear from the image. I remember one comic where Beret Guy was off in the distance and it was difficult to distinguish him from the image, but the official transcript said it was him. We don't stick to the original transcript if it's obviously wrong, or it has typographical errors: see [[Laser Scope]]. Those edits seem to be mainly targeted at language and clarity, and should be fine. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would it be helpful to have another (optional) section for expanding on the official transcripts? I too think it could be helpful, especially for complex images (such as 1079/United Shapes [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1079]). Or does supplemental description belong in the Explanation sections? Cheers. [[User:Karenb|Karenb]] ([[User talk:Karenb|talk]]) 23:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Naaah, how many people even know there's an original transcript? If the original is wrong, change it. If your additions begin to verge on explanatory, move eet to the trivia/explanation sections. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Characters in this Comic&amp;quot; section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should there be a &amp;quot;Characters in this Comic&amp;quot; section in each comic explanation? (I feel like this should be longer but don't have anything else to say.) [[User:Z|Z]] ([[User talk:Z|talk]]) 23:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a Category section at the bottom of each comic. Just scroll down and you will see any character belonging to a specific comic. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adding the Radiation chart from XKCD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi &lt;br /&gt;
As there are already other comics with explanations even though they are not part of the number system.&lt;br /&gt;
This one does not seem to have any yet:&lt;br /&gt;
http://xkcd.com/radiation/&lt;br /&gt;
And as it is very alike the Money strip (the unexplained of the week) so I think it should be explained as well.&lt;br /&gt;
If you agree please add it as I'm not sure how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best regards&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reddit comments? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There should be a link in each comics explanation page somewhere linking to the comment section for the relevant comic on /r/xkcdcomic or reddit.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reddit comments page isn't ''that'' close to what we do though. If this is more popular, we'll do it, though there'll need to be a fair bit of post-hoc editing since I don't think there's a standard URL scheme for all the past comics. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not insulting new users ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am writing a response to a vulnerability assessment.  I have included a link to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936 noting that it contains a good explanation of the relative security of passwords vs passphrases.  I just noticed that the top of that page contains &amp;quot;Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.&amp;quot;  Looks like I'll have to find a different site to link to.  --[[User:Pascal|Pascal]] ([[User talk:Pascal|talk]]) 17:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  While I'm sure it can seem cute or funny in various circles, that text has always seemed immature and inappropriate to me, and I'm sure to many folks we'd like to invite to the site. I suggest that it be changed.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 19:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The XKCD  http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936 suggestion for password is actually not that good. [http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/62832/is-the-oft-cited-xkcd-scheme-no-longer-good-advice read here] for some more discussion.   [[Special:Contributions/162.158.253.6|162.158.253.6]] 23:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I also agree.  I'm not here because I'm stupid, I'm here because I don't know something and I'm hoping this site can help.  It's off putting to have that text there, and there's no benefit to it.  What about just repeating the thing at the top of XKCD.com: &amp;quot;Romance, Sarcasm, Math, and Language: Explained&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RSS feed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there an RSS feed (or some equivalent) of Explain XKCD available? It's helpful for those using feed readers, and superior to the primary XKCD RSS since there are explanations and the mouse over text is transcribed for the lazy. Thanks [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.154|108.162.219.154]] 08:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:NewPages&amp;amp;feed=atom&amp;amp;hideredirs=1&amp;amp;limit=90&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;namespace=0&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;feed=&amp;amp;tagfilter= Why yes, we do!] It's the regular new pages log that all wikis have. It's a little ugly at the moment, and sometimes junk gets in there when a bot chucks spam at us, so a nicer feed is in the works, but the linked one should do you excellently for now. When the nice one is done, you'll see it in the sidebar below the &amp;quot;Help&amp;quot; button. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Navigation Pane Link - Categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about having a link to the &amp;quot;Special:Categories&amp;quot; page in the navigation pane?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fair amount of effort has gone into categorising the comics, and at the moment it isn't particularly obvious how to browse by category. Is this worth doing?{{unsigned|Pudder}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Space on the sidebar is on a premium. I dunno, I'd probably be against it, but I want to hear what other admins say as well. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 16:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate realities what if would benefit from a wiki entry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The what if entry from the end of November 2014 providing excerpts from alternate reality what ifs would benefit from an explain page. &lt;br /&gt;
I suspect these may have been typos that have been made into jokes, but some of the humor might not be apparent to all.  &lt;br /&gt;
I doubt I have access (or maybe know how) to set it up myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:  Made it. Check out [[What If: 120: Alternate Universe What Ifs]]. [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 09:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We don't actually have a structure for what if pages in general, so I'll have to take that down, but when we do we can make pages for every what if. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secondary URLs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have made http://www.xkcd.ga and http://www.xkcd.tk both forward to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Is this ok? [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:While we probably won't advertise them because we can't guarantee the uptime of third-party URLs, and they add an additional redirect layer and lack our shortened URL features, you're free to purchase and link URLs to us independently. We are not owned by Randall and as such cannot claim to actually be xkcd, so I'm not hugely comfortable with you using the plain name &amp;quot;xkcd&amp;quot; to link to us; a url in the format http://www.xkcd.[TLD] should by rights link to the main xkcd site, but no trademark claim has been made or likely will be made, so you should be fine with doing whatever you want to do with URL redirects '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LaTeX (Or MathML, TeX) support? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[1489:_Fundamental_Forces|In the most recent comic at the time of posting]], there was use of formulae, being:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;gravity&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = G m&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/d&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;static&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; q&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/d&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There are probably many more comics using formulae that cannot be rendered properly without the use of LaTeX or something. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Displaying_a_formula help page on Wikipedia] says that the following should work:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{gravity}=G\frac{m_1m_2}{d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{static}=K_e\frac{q_1q_2}{d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Provided that one has to set &amp;lt;source lang=&amp;quot;php&amp;quot; enclose=&amp;quot;none&amp;quot;&amp;gt;$wgUseTeX = true;&amp;lt;/source&amp;gt; in [[mw:Manual:LocalSettings.php|LocalSettings.php]]. Is there any reason for this to be disabled? If there is, is there any alternative?  —[[Special:Contributions/141.101.106.95|141.101.106.95]] 21:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The wgUseTeX flag was deprecated in mediawiki 1.18 in a move to simplify base mediawiki and move niche features into seperate plugins. I vaguely remember this being requested in the past, can't find any evidence of me implementing it. I'll try it now, see what stopped me last time. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, there's a bit of configuration work to it and I was busy at the time probably. I'll put it on the growing to do list on my userpage. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merge Cueball &amp;amp; Rob ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the risk of posting this idea too many places and annoying everyone, I would like to propose that we consider merging [[Cueball]] and [[Rob]] and redirecting Cueball to Rob, much as [[Cutie]] now redirects to [[Megan]]. The most common name given for a Cueball-like character in the strip is &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;. Like Megan, he is not always named. Also, like Megan, Rob tends to have distinct characteristics such as being a nerdy alter-ego to Randall (e.g. [[1168: tar]]) just as Megan often is the appearance given to comic representations of Randall's wife (see [[1141: Two Years]], before hair loss). Megan and Cueball appear to have a relationship (e.g. [[159: Boombox]]) and Megan clearly hangs out with Rob in ways not inconsistent with adventurous couples (e.g. [[782: Desecration]]). Finally, comics that feature both [[Black Hat]] and &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; seem to depict them as friends and possibly roommates. However, we learn in [[1102: Fastest-Growing]] that Black Hat's roommate is named &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, I believe if [[159: Boombox]] had called &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; we would've rewritten both Cutie and Cueball to redirect there.  Because we learned that &amp;quot;Cueball's&amp;quot; name is actually Rob much later (I think the earliest occurrences are [[647: Scary]], and [[716: Time Machine]]; the first time he is seen with Megan in a capacity that might indicate a relationship is [[782: Desecration]]). [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 19:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As I answered your comment on [[1496: Art Project]] Rob is [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Comics_featuring_Rob  already listed] as part of the category for Comics featuring Cueball: and this is listed as the first entry when going to the page for [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Comics_featuring_Cueball Category:Comics featuring Cueball]. Cueball is such an integral part of explain xkcd that I do not think any other users wish to change. Also the 9 incidences with Rob is maybe a specific person and at the time Randall did not think to give him any features. Also Cueballs have no specific behavior as you allude to. Neither has Megan. You can always find several Cueballs and Megans that behave a certain way. But then you can find many other comics where they behave the opposite way. Thus Rob and Cueball should not be merged. Also there are several comics with more than one Cueball. And here we have this problem: It is typically the first who writes the transcript who decides who of the Cueballs (or Megans) he feels represents the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; Cueball. However, there is no real behavior of Cueball. So who should decide. I could change all these transcripts so it becomes the other character who becomes Cueball, because I think that the first transcriber did it wrong. And this is why in a comic with more than one Cueball (where neither is called Rob or the like) neither of the two should be called Cueball. It would still be in the category with Cueball, because that is just comics with a Cueball like character no matter how many. But they cannot be named Cueball and friend or Rob and friend (unless Rob's name is mentioned!) They could be called Cueball 1 and Cueball 2, but then guy or man would be better. I know several places have comics with two Cueballs where someone has designated one of them Cueball and the other friend of foe etc. But this should be corrected so none of these are called Cueball. Same should go for more than one Megan. But this is very rare, and I have only found one other than ''Art project'' and here only one Megan had any lines. The problem with different opinions on which Cueball is which came for the first time up with Megan in ''Art project'': The two Megan-like characters was first named (left to right) Megan and Danish. Then unidentified girl and Megan. Then Megan and unidentified girl, then two Megan like girls with short and long hair and finally you reverted it to my first change away from Danish to unidentified girl and Megan. (I can live with that as there is difference in hair length and behavior). But as far as I see it Cueball is not Rob as well as Megan should have continued to be called Cutie (but I would not like to change that now, as I have grown fond of Megan). But at the time the change was done I believe it was wrong. The same fondness for the name Cueball also makes me sure that no one else would wish to call him Rob, even if that is as much his name as Megan is Cuties... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My argument is that it is inertia and sentiment (&amp;quot;fond of Megan&amp;quot;) that prevents an objective, equal treatment here. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 22:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, regarding the analogy made above to Danish.  I am fine with a nickname when Randall hasn't named a character.  So she was &amp;quot;unidentified girl&amp;quot; and then became &amp;quot;Danish&amp;quot;.  But, when we named her &amp;quot;Danish&amp;quot;, we went back to &amp;quot;Journal 1&amp;quot; and other places and renamed her.  My proposal is that we should go back through and rename &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;.  Alternatively, we should reinstate &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; for cases in which it is not clear that a character is &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; per se, but just Megan in her &amp;quot;everywoman&amp;quot; capacity. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 00:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure how to post a poll, but I see the following options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Status quo: Cueball for all unidentified males without distinct characteristics (e.g. hats), Megan for all shoulder-length brunettes.  Rob only for named Cueballs.  Multiple Cueballs in a comic mean one is named Cueball and others get named &amp;quot;Friend&amp;quot;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Symmetry 1: Cueball/Rob stays as is.  Unnamed brunettes get named &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; is reserved for comics in which a name is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Symmetry 2: Megan stays as is.  Rob is the default for indistinct males.  &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; page redirects to &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; (as &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; now redirect to &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Expunge all Cueballs from multi-Cueball comics: Basically the status quo, except that in comics with multiple Cueballs none are named &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; and are just all given names &amp;quot;Man 1&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Man 2&amp;quot;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am ambivalent regarding options 2 or 3.  I could live with 1 if there is consensus for it, but I don't like it.  4 is a disaster in my mind and gains nothing. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 22:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are probably the only one who reads these post...? But anyway as is clear I'm for 4. Which has been used several places already.´I can live with 1. I think 2 and 3 are disasters. Also it would be completely confusing for those who have used this page for many years. Why do you bring this up now? Is it because of the multiple Megan comics, or have you just signed up here, and dislike that it doesn't follow the rules you would have expected?--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
::I suggest instead that we create a category for multiple Cueballs, so it is easy to explain why the Cueball is not a specific character, and thus can never be Rob (except when it is clear from the text), or be expected to behave a certain way. And in reverse we make a Named Megan category so it is easy to find the few (three?) where she has been named. This by the way has nothing to do with the other suggestions, so I might just do that to get an overview. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: It seems more consistent to me to use [[Cutie]] for all unnamed &amp;quot;Megans&amp;quot; and reserve &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; for named comics. Thus, Rob is '''a''' Cueball and Megan is '''a''' Cutie. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 13:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've read through some of your discussions (Here, Kynde's talk page, Art Project discussion), and thought I might put my thoughts forwards. Essentially we have three questions here:&lt;br /&gt;
::::1) Should we merge Cueball and Rob, and rename all Cueballs as Rob?&lt;br /&gt;
::::2) Should we rename all Megans as Cutie, except where she is explicitly named?&lt;br /&gt;
::::3) Once questions 1 &amp;amp; 2 are answered, what do we do where the 'same' character appears multiple times in one comic?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I understand the objective argument for renaming Cueball to Rob, however I'm unconvinced of the importance of being entirely objective, and I can't imagine Cueball being renamed to anything other than Cueball. &lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think its fairly clear where the Cueball label has come from, even if it might not be immediately obvious to some. Even if readers don't make the link between Cueball's head and a cue-ball, it is quite a generic label, which I think fits well with the transient every-man nature of Cueball's usage.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*There is something far more specific about the name Rob, which suggests that he is the same character every time. The origin of the name isn't obvious, which I think would be likely to cause confusion. &lt;br /&gt;
::::This brings me to conclude that for me, the answer to Q1 has to be that Cueball should stay as Cueball, unless explicitly named something else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The question of changing Megan to Cutie is one where I am less confident. Following the arguments I've made above, the outcome has to be that we rename to Cutie unless specifically named Megan, however I am not entirely convinced. The name Megan has a history, there are surely lots of people who now know her as Megan, what do we really stand to gain from all the work of changing to Cutie? I would also suggest that the name Cutie may not be accepted well by those with strong feminist views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::As far as multi-character comics, I don't have time right now, but I will come back later and add my thoughts. Now that we've only got a few incomplete comics, we've had to resort to discussing renaming characters!--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I agree with the reasons for keeping Cueball and Megan. And also that Cutie is such a loaded word, that it should never have been used anyway. This I did not immediately think about, but Cutie sounds like something from either a porn movie, or else a Bond Babe... Like the phrase from one of those movies: &amp;quot;Hello, I'm Plenty...&amp;quot; Then we should have to find a third name. And everyone here knows her as Megan. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I have created the [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Multiple_Cueballs Category:Multiple Cueballs] to locate them and to show how often there are more than one. Feel free to add any I haven't found yet. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Rob is Black Hat's roommate and Megan's boyfriend/partner/husband (see above).  The &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; in comics such as [[159: Boombox]] and [[542: Cover-Up]] should, in my view, be renamed &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;, even though he is not explicitly called that in those comics.  Most other &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; comics can stay unchanged. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 00:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have left my reason to disagree also with this on the two comics talk page. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, it is quite clear that [[Randall]] has chosen to name the main male protagonist [[Rob]], for the few occasions where he needs characters to call upon each other, in the same way as he has chosen [[Megan]] for the main female protagonist. We should therefore try to overcome our nostalgia, follow Randall, and call the common male protagonist Rob. The problem with multiple cueballs can most often be resolved by identifying the protagonist, from the first-person narration or the general perspective. Thus, in [[525: I Know You're Listening]] Rob is the comic's &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;, to the left. In [[1110: Click and Drag]], Rob is obviously flying with a balloon. In [[610: Sheeple]] Rob is arguably the guy in the foreground facing us. Non-Rob &amp;quot;cueballs&amp;quot; we could refer to as &amp;quot;friend&amp;quot; &amp;quot;man&amp;quot;, etc. In this way roughly half of the &amp;quot;multiple cueballs&amp;quot; would be resolved. I think I can live with a few unclear cases, like [[220: Philosophy]]. [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A featureless character has been ''specifically'' named Rob in 9 comics, compared with 968 'Comics featuring Cueball'. I believe it is fundamentally flawed to assert that because a featureless character is named Rob in less than 1% of appearances, that all featureless characters should therefore be assumed to be Rob. As I've discussed above, I think that Rob strongly implies a specific person, whereas Cueball is a vague 'everyman' character. I feel it would be a huge error to change all Cueballs to Robs.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem with that logic is that &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; is only named in a small number of comics (fewer that &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;).  So we should have a different name for an unnamed generic female.  [[Cutie]] is fine, but if people perceive that as sexist, then another name, maybe &amp;quot;Cuegirl&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Brunette&amp;quot; would work.  (Side note: I doubt &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; would be perceived as sexist and there's history there.)  What I '''do''' find sexist is the fact that there is asymmetry between male and female &amp;quot;everyperson&amp;quot;s.  In sum, I would say there is at less evidence to support naming Megan-everywoman &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; in all cases as there is to name Rob-everyman (here called &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;) &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; in all cases.  Asymmetry here ignores the fact that Randall clearly intends his name to be &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; and also that we are using a proper name for everywoman but a contrived name for everyman, while creating an artificial distinction between Rob and Cueball and smearing out any possible distinction between Megan-everywoman and Megan-properName. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 13:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I put in my earlier comment (see above), I do agree that the logical conclusion is that Megan should no longer be named Megan, and should have an equivalent generic name. As an aside, I'm quite partial to your suggestion of Cuegirl. I disagree with your assertion that &amp;quot;Randall clearly intends his name to be Rob&amp;quot;, and I think that is the central point of this discussion. I don't believe that there is anywhere near enough evidence to assign a specific name to what I believe is a generic character. If we want to go for formal logic, consider the syllogism &amp;quot;Some non descipt characters are called Rob, there are many non-descript characters, therfore all non-descript characters are called Rob&amp;quot;. The conclusion simply does not follow. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Great, I vote for Cuegirl &amp;amp; Cueball :: Megan &amp;amp; Rob!  [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 01:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Djbrasier's and St.nerol's arguments, and I too feel that the arguments against dealing with this in an objective, symmetrical and logical way seem mostly based on nostalgia. Either we agree that a few named instances of the everywoman are sufficient to generalize to the (vastly more numerous) unnamed instances, and apply the same standard to the everyman, which is only consistent (and even more justified in the case of Rob since he is named in more comics than Megan), or we decide that the extrapolation is unjustified and we revert the Cutie--&amp;gt;Megan merge. The alternative --having double standards and deciding things based on historical baggage and emotional attachment rather than rationality-- makes no sense for followers of the comic that ''literally invented'' nerd-sniping!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd also add that, as a non-native speaker, &amp;quot;cueball&amp;quot; doesn't ring any immediate bells unless the connection to cue balls is pointed out explicitly -- so actually Rob works even better as a generic name than Cueball. We have already [[#New character|agreed previously]] that clarity is better than cleverness when we named [[Hairy]], forgoing the less obvious alliteration &amp;quot;Harry&amp;quot;, so I vote we use the name Randall ''actually'' gave us, let go of our attachments to a creation he never endorsed, and honor our collective nerdiness by doing the logical thing: apply our standards uniformly and adopt Rob the same way we adopted Megan. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 06:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've already put my thoughts forward above, so I won't repeat the same ground I've covered, other than to say I believe it would be a mistake to turn all Cueballs into Robs. While I will admit to having some nostalgia for the name Cueball, that isn't a major facet of my argument. I believe that any generic name is better than a specific name. Call them Stickboy &amp;amp; Stickgirl if you want! I know there are a fairly significant number of contributors and visitors who do not have English as their first language, but I don't believe that is a reason to choose a specific name, rather than a generic name, even if the origin of the latter isn't immediately obvious to all. It would be interesting to know whether each of us sees Cueball as always being the same person, or Cueball *is* Randall, or Cueball is just a changeable everyman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To me, he is a changeable everyman, who I guess may represent or be based on: Randall, his friends, family or acquaintances, famous people, someone he saw in the street, or a completely made up character used to fill a specific role in the comic. The reason I argue againt merging Rob &amp;amp; Cueball is that the Cueball I see is this morphing and fluid character, and to use a specific name to tie him down to being the same character all the time runs completely counter to that. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 08:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Understood, and sorry for mischaracterizing your argument (the nostalgia part does butt the discussion though). I suppose I would be somewhat ambivalent to either have Rob+Megan, or Cueball+Cutie -- Cuegirl doesn't work because she has hair :) --, in the interests of reason and symmetry. But I lean slightly towards Rob+Megan because those are names Randall actually gave us, while anything else is our own invention and thus has no claim to legitimacy other than popular support.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Particularly, while I understand your concern about shoehorning the various personality traits the Cueballs show in different comics into a single persona, that doesn't seem to have been a problem for Megan -- not to mention real people ''are'' indeed complex and multi-faceted beings (or &amp;quot;morphing and fluid&amp;quot;, to use your terms) rather than one-dimensional caricatures. Heck, even Black Hat has his romantic side! :) So in light of that, I don't think we have to worry about ruining Cueball by naming him Rob -- if anything, that'd add more depth to him as a character! --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 16:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm still very much against changing things here. Call it nostalgia, but there are many users who will never read these arguments, who one day comes back and cannot find Megan or Cueball, and will ask who the heck are Cuegirl/Cutie. I'm completely with Pudder on the problem with giving Cueball the name Rob. It just doesn't make sense. I agree that we have a inconsistency with Megan. But then everyone who uses this page a few times, becomes familiar with that name. However the main problem with all your great ideas is this. Who should correct the either 984 pages where Cueball is mentioned because he is a part of it (and all the other pages relevant to him or where he is exactly mentioned because he isn't part of the comic) and/or who should do the same for 487 comics (plus loose pages) for Megan. Unless those in favor for changing the names will do this, then the discussion is moot. It is already clearly stated in the relevant pages that these two characters are generic and that they have been named but a few times. So what more can we do unless someone is willing to use several days to change this back. I sincerely doubt you can keep the correct syntax if you just try a brute force replacement? There are so many interconnecting links etc. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I completely disagree with merging Cueball and Rob. Rob has [[276|Emily]] and [[632|Lisa]] as girlfriends, and Cueball has Megan. Rob also lives a more action-filled and stereotypical life compared to Cueball. --[[User:Youforgotthisthing|Youforgotthisthing]] ([[User talk:Youforgotthisthing|talk]]) 13:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the main stances here are clear:&lt;br /&gt;
* Keep as is&lt;br /&gt;
* Rename Cuball to Rob&lt;br /&gt;
* Change Megan back to Cutie/Cuegirl&lt;br /&gt;
Since keeping it status quo wouldn't change anything and is asymmetrical, I'll go over the others:&lt;br /&gt;
* Rename Cueball to Rob - Arguments:&lt;br /&gt;
** Randall gave him this name;&lt;br /&gt;
** It would offer symmetry to Megan;&lt;br /&gt;
** If the Cutie -&amp;gt; Megan logic is to be followed (as she was changed once named in the comics) then Cueball should be Rob;&lt;br /&gt;
** Even though cueball is a generic everyman name, Rob seems more like a name you could give anyone and would be more recognizable to non-native English speakers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Change Megan back to Cutie/Cuegirl - Arguments:&lt;br /&gt;
** It would cause symmetry again, letting her have an everywoman name;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nostalgia for Cueball;&lt;br /&gt;
** Megan is not always the same character, so she should not always have the name Megan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I happen to agree with the idea of merging Cueball and Rob, but I'm not closed to the idea of Cutie/Cuegirl. The main problem is that these characters are typically interchangeable everymen/everywomen and there can be more than one in a comic. So another question is what we should do for multiple Cueballs/Robs. In my opinion, we should have all the comics with more than one depict them as Man 1, Man 2, etc. --[[User:Sensorfire|Sensorfire]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire|talk]]) 17:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I disagree. The users are used to refeer to these characters now by these names. It is also impractical to try to change them all. Megan is rarely twice in a comic. Maybe she is more the same like Black Hat is. But it is made clear that they are not the same in every comic in their pages. If there are muliple Cueballs but one is the main protagonist then he us cueball. If none can be singled out then Cueball like guy to the left/right can be used. I have done that for tbose cases I have found so far ([[:Category:Multiple_Cueballs|49 today]]).--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to fit explanations of new classes of xkcd-related mysteries into the site: what-if, t-shirts, posters, special comics etc. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest that the [http://explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:About explain xkcd] page should explain how this site is laid out, and what sorts of things are explained here besides the online numbered xkcd comics that come out three times a week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, there is the [[A Smarter Planet]] series, and there are ideas for explaining some of the [http://what-if.xkcd.com/ What-If] series.  I'd like to add my explanation of the [https://gist.github.com/nealmcb/398af29a72f7b3efc202 XKCD Greek t-shirt, with mathematical, scientific and engineering uses for greek letters] and perhaps some other t-shirts, posters and the like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I can't even figure out how to find non-numbered-comic-explanations, without going thru the entire [[Special:AllPages]] listing, which includes a huge set of unnumbered aliases as well as the numbered ones.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've taken a stab towards that by editing the About page to point to some categories (and to start with a little overview), but since I'm just poking around, I might have missed some things.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 19:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on main page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there should be a link to [[Special:SpecialPages]] on the main-page--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 11:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Special pages is a default feature in every mediawiki installation. It's also in the sidebar of every page, and it's not relevant to xkcd. Why does it merit space on the main page? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 18:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Science comic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the Science Magazine comic be added? http://m.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/58.full [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 03:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that would be a great idea. Could there be other copyright rules when the comic has been published on Science? It there anyway to find out if Randall also has a link to it from (or has it on) xkcd? As he has done with the other [[:Category:Extra_Comics|Extra_Comics]]. And how do we create such a page, if there can be no link directly to xkcd (at the top of the comic)? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;what if?&amp;quot; section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to start a new &amp;quot;what if?&amp;quot; section explaining and discussing what if pages.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 06:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does it need to exist? The main xkcd comic needs it, because Randall tends to be obtuse at times, but the what if articles are sourced and written out already. Supposedly, they're already explanations to questions sent in to Randall. Why do we need to explain explanations? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Explaining them indeed seems unnecessary, but we could certainly catalog and summarize them. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 16:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The images on what if? also have title texts that could further be explained, and we could organize what if pages by categories, as well as provide summaries. There are also subtle references, running gags, and in-jokes in What If? that should be explained.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This https://what-if.xkcd.com/120/ is a example of a what if that could do with some explanations.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's one of 135 what-ifs, and it's entirely self referential and can be figured out by reading the rest of the archive. The substance of the majority of pages is going to be incredibly thin, Randall doesn't tend to leave much for explanation. Comics that are simple one-shot images are our least used pages for good reason, and the what-if images pretty much all fall into that category, or are used to illustrate Randall's point that he makes in the immediately preceding paragraph. We could archive/catalog all the what-if pages and be a second archive button for the series, though there's a little less value to that than the archiving we did for [[Time]] and [[Externalities]] because there's already an archive along the same lines on the main site. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 19:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think the main value we could add is a summary (TL;DR style) of each entry, in a short Q&amp;amp;A format. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 12:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
If we are going forward with this, is there anyway to find the date in which the what if was first published?--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 09:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:At the bottom of the page, there's an archive button. Click that. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 19:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Well, fact is,  the [[what if?]] page is much, '''much''' larger now. [[User:Nk22|Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 11:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Nk22!  I've added a link from the [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd About explain xkcd] page. {{unsigned|Nealmcb}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Userscript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello there, just wrote a simple userscript that adds an 'Explain' button to the original xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://gist.github.com/magazov/934de662d60c9fb5fea9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can run it via Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and other similar plugins :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Screen_Shot_xkcd_button.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{unsigned|Magazovski}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, there's a few of these floating around. In the future, could you use an imgur link instead of uploading stuff like that to the wiki? Thanks. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 18:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So maybe explainxkcd should host &amp;amp; maintain one of them? --[[User:Magazovski|Magazovski]] ([[User talk:Magazovski|talk]]) 09:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why would we host an image hosting site? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::He means we could host and maintain a userscript to help our fans get here from xkcd....  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 14:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hum, that's not a bad idea. I'll put it on the list of things to do. Although, if they're already here, why do they need a userscript to help them get here? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::For people who mainly view the comics through the official site, but sometimes need an explanation of the comic. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 09:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Updating the incomplete comic of the day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, I think the incomplete comic of the day should be changed more often (i.e. daily), since the incomplete comics are piling up, and most users aren't seeing the notice, as it is dismissible.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 11:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree that the comic of the day could be changed more often, I wouldn't say that the incomplete comics are ''piling up''. Over the months I've been active here, the number of incomplete comics had fallen considerably. In fact if you check the comics which are still marked as incomplete, most of them are one where a significant effort would be required to complete them. For example the large comics (Money, Time, Congress) or dynamic comics (Externalities, Click &amp;amp; Drag, Pixels). --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah. Of the 15 incomplete &amp;quot;pages,&amp;quot; only 10 of them are actual comics that need the attention, and the full count is still dropping. I've been keeping it on single comics as of late because the remaining actual incomplete comics have been cycled through ~3 times already, with no significant effort made on them, because they're such monumental pieces of work. Making the message dismissable is by design, we are a service first and foremost, we're not trying that hard to make visitors do our work for us. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infrequently recurring minor charachters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we just group all of the characters that are not of enough significance to warrant their own character page into a single page (i.e. [[Other Minor Characters]])?  --{{User:17jiangz1/signature|02:58, 09 May 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
:See comic [[1000]] for a sample of what this entails. Also, what value to we stand to provide by cataloging every unique character that has appeared in xkcd? Does it help us explain the comics any better? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comic page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is comic page creation not automated? If it isn't, then [[Help talk:How to add a new comic explanation]] should be created.--{{User:17jiangz1/signature|14:19, 26 May 2015}} 14:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comic explanation was, at one point, automated. However, the bot ran on a schedule, and so sometimes there would be a few hours between a new comic being posted and the page getting created. Some editors just can't wait that long, so they do the bot's work before the bot even gets going. I agree that this page should be created and be kept up to date. Historically no one has read any of the help pages I've written. ;p [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 17:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:However, I think that the page should be [[Help:Comic Explanation Page Creation]]. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 17:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re-proposing merging Cueball and Rob ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, so this was previously [[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob discussed] but I felt that it was worth bringing up again. Really, at this point, there's no logical reason why the two should not be merged, or Megan and Cutie should be un-merged. Rob and Cueball clearly seem to be the same person, at least when cueball appears as a specific character. In the instances where there are multiple Cueballs, we should just refer to them as Man 1, Man 2, and so on. Can we get a vote or something this time? Yes, I understand that Cueball isn't always the same character. But neither is [[Megan]], and yet we always refer to the short black haired girl (formerly [[Cutie]]) as Megan. If that logic applies to her, it applies to Rob. It's pretty clear that Randall intended to name the character Rob, as most named Cueballs are named Rob and not Fred or something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short: Please don't bring nostalgia into this, it's really not relevant. Changing Cueball to Rob or Megan back to Cutie (or Cuegirl?) would have symmetry and make sense. {{unsigned ip|Sensorfire}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm ok with dumping a marginal character page that only served to add confusion to character identification in new comics, but this was a subject of contention before so we probably need to see more of people's thoughts first. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree: let's list the arguments for both sides, ensure that everyone agrees with the objectiveness of that listing, and then vote. If there's support for this plan, and nobody does it first, I'll take a stab at producing a first draft of the summary. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 23:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall is currently on a booktour. So, how about, instead of us (without the ability to read minds) arguing about his intention or who is/isn't the same character, someone go see him and ask? Then we'll know with absolute 100% certainty. [[User:WaltG123|WaltG123]] ([[User talk:WaltG123|talk]]) 04:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Randall never called either character Cueball and Cutie so of course this is not his names. Asking him would make no meaning at all. For any user of xkcd it will create lots of confusion to change the names of Megan and Cueball now. Regarding Rob he is already listed as Cueball in his category. And Cueballs have been called other names several times. Rob is just the only one that has been used a few times. I agree that it may have been wrong to call her Megan, (the name has been used like three times?) Similar it is just as wrong to call Black Hat's girlfriend [[Danish]], a nick name used once. But it is actually very nice to have a real name or at least useful name when speaking of characters. And it has also been mentioned that Cutie could be perused as a sexist name, so we should not move back to that. Well recently even [[Hairbun]] has her name changed from Hairbun girl since a user thought that was a problem given it most often was a grown woman.  So I think we should stick to the solution of the previous debate and leave Cueball, Rob and Megan alone as they are! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adjective phrases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overwhelmed with the need to be picayune, I am compelled to point out that on the homepage there is the sentence that begins &amp;quot;There are a lot of comics that don't have set in stone explanations...&amp;quot; This sentence contains a adjective phrase which should be hyphenated thus: &amp;quot;set-in-stone&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please pretend that I have said something witty here, as I am too tired to think of anything funny. {{unsigned|Gamewriter}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Is it actually grammatically wrong in it's current state? Huh. I guess I'll change it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is long after the fact, but I'll throw my two cents in on Davidy22's question. Yes, it is wrong. If the 'set in stone' phrase were after the word explanations (&amp;quot;explanations set in stone&amp;quot;) it would not require hyphens, but used as an adjective before the noun (&amp;quot;set-in-stone explanations&amp;quot;) it requires them. D Miller [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.41|108.162.221.41]] 18:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are currently using MediaWiki 1.19.17. It's ''really'' outdated. Maybe update to 1.26.2, the current recommended stable version? There is an [[mw:Manual:Upgrading|official guide]] for that. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.77|141.101.80.77]] 12:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC) (PS my IP address is wrong it's not what you think it is)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rename Hair Bun Girl ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character [[Hair Bun Girl]] was named in April 2015. There wasn't any discussion of the name at the time, so I'd like to open that discussion now please.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present we have several other characters named after distinctive visual features: [[Ponytail]], [[Black Hat]], [[White Hat]], [[Beret Guy]], and arguably [[Hairy]] and [[Cueball]]. In all but one of those cases, the name matches the distinctive feature itself, without the addition of &amp;quot;guy&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot;, etc. Given the number of comics that Beret Guy is in it's probably too late to modify his name, but it's not too late for Hair Bun Girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the consistency issue, there's also the inaccuracy of referring to a grown woman with the term &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot;, particularly when the character has been presented as older than [[Megan]]. I'd really like to fix this while her number of appearances is still manageable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name &amp;quot;Hairbun&amp;quot; has been proposed and I think that matches really nicely with Ponytail in particular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 04:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the &amp;quot;guy&amp;quot; who created the Hair Bun Girl characther, I have no objection to changing the name. I did not think about the issue with girl/woman, probably because I'm not native English speaker. (And with the Beret Guy as an example). Jkshapiro was so kind as to [[User_talk:Kynde#Hair_Bun_.22Girl.22|ask my opinion]] before starting this discussion. At first I thought that ''Hairbun'' was a little weird, but then again so is Ponytail in this context. So I '''support''' the change to '''Hairbun'''! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I vote '''change''' Hair Bun to Hairbun and '''keep''' girl. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 21:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, I'm going ahead. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 02:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well as I said I would not mind, but you cannot say you got any other to agree with you on this though. Mimek wished to keep girl... It will be a huge job to get all the instances correct, also be careful no to change those places where the talk is of a girl who has a hair bun. You cannot just change all placed with hair bun girl to Hairbun, in case is actually says the hair bun girl about a small girl who has a hair bun!  --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems no one cares, so I will remove the notes now. Great job Jkshapiro with changing the names. I like the new name now :-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 22:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mobile friendly website ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we get a mobile friendly version of the wiki?  If we already have one, what about forwarding the main site to it when viewed on a phone? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 20:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there may be a need to propose a standard way to decide on categories: what new ones are needed, what are the prerequisites for creating a new category, how to maintain new categories and make sure they are actually used when they apply etc. For now I have gathered all previous discussions about new categories under this section. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 13:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that whenever there are more than 4-5 comics that you wish to refer to in a given explanation because they are of the same topic as the current comic, then having a category is much to prefer rather than listing 5, 6 or 7 comics. I have made several categories for these instances, for instance for sport including the most used sports. At the time being I keep them up to date. One of the things this site does so well is giving you an easy way to find a specific comic even though you cannot remember the title of any precise quotes etc. If you just have an idea of what the topic was you might find it based on the categories. In this way I do not think we can have too many categories. As long as they describe a recurring subject. Only fault is that there seems to be no way to search for a comic based on more than one category? That would be great. In some cases even only 3 comics in a category can make sense. For instance I would be sorry to see this one go [[:Category:Puts on sunglasses]] (and I did not make it!) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::For instance I have long wished for categories that covered all the space probe related comics, particularly all those referencing the Mars rovers. So today I made them with 16 and 9 comics in them already. [[:Category:Space probes]] [[:Category:Mars rovers]]. I hope people will generally think this was a great idea! :-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And [[:Category:The Lion King]]... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Protip ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone for adding ''Protip'' as a [[:Category:Comic series|Comic series]]. I have found five so far: [[653]], [[711]], [[1022]], [[1047]] and [[1156]]. (There are also a few comics with a protip title text.) -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that qualifies as a recurring topic (thus worthy of a category), but not as a series, where you can see a clear sequence. In fact, [[:Category:My Hobby|My Hobby]] has the same limitation, for what I suggest it to be removed from [[:Category:Comic series]]. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seconded. Looks general and common enough to be a category. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Okay, great! Do you think that the ones with a &amp;quot;protip:&amp;quot; title text should be included? Besides, I think I might be the one responsiple for moving My Hobby from [[:Category:Comics by topic|Comics by topic]] to Comic series. I felt that all the My Hobby comics were about different topics, but maybe i've got to narrow an interpretation of the word &amp;quot;topic&amp;quot;. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Can you link to the protip-in-title-text comics?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: As for My Hobby, note that categories aren't mutually exclusive. They can be in the &amp;quot;my hobby&amp;quot; topic, and each of them further categorized as appropriate: music, math, etc. Makes sense? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 03:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I just searched for protip in the xkcd search bar. Here: [[1084]], [[427]]. And yes, makes sense. I've moved My Hobby back to &amp;quot;by topic&amp;quot;. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Sports ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about creating a new &amp;quot;Sports&amp;quot; category?  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 15:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, maybe. Everyone aren't so keen on new categories here. Which comics are you thinking of, for a start? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 20:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We definitely need to reach an agreement as a community on when to create new categories. Something simple like a minimum of 3 (or, say, 5) existing comics. Since we're already at the proposals' portal... what do you guys think about that? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 21:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My opinion:  Five would be enough to qualify.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 09:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I vote for four. But it should also be a reasonable thing to categorize, like sports, not like &amp;quot;sports with Cueball containing at least three anagram words&amp;quot;. Wich sholdn't be a problem. :) But the best name choice could be tricky sometimes. e.g. &amp;quot;Film &amp;amp; television&amp;quot;, Film &amp;amp; TV&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Film&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Films&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;Movies&amp;quot;? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed, five should be enough to create the category without having to discuss it. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, let's start with [[588: Pep Rally|588]], [[1092: Michael Phelps|1092]], [[904: Sports|904]] and [[1107: Sports Cheat Sheet|1107]].  Should be able to find a few more.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 05:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, it's a broad subject so there are probably several more.  -[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I found another one, sort of, in [[929:Speculation|929]] (although it hasn't been explained yet).  Should I get the ball rolling (no pun intended) on setting up the category?  Don't wanna do it unilaterally and get yelled at.  ;)  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 06:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you should. On a wiki, getting stuck in discussions which die without a conclusion, to the point that motivated people give up without having done anything, is definitely counter-productive, and phrases like [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Be bold|Wikipedia:Be bold]] are here to remind us of that. Seems like people agreed that you ''could'', and after a while nobody said that you ''shouldn't'', so I'd say do it. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I did it without looking here first, because it was obvious there were many [[:Category:Sport|sport comics]]. I have even created four under categories (only one was there before, Chess). There are 10 comics at present that are related to other sports than the five under categories. And given the way Randall thinks about sport (not very much) he still has plenty of comics about the subject. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 07:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Sex ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should also create a Sex category.  There's no ''doubt'' we can find more than three examples.  I'll start looking for them and post the ones I find in here; again, I don't wanna create a large category by myself without community consent.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 09:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
*OK, the ones for Category: Sex that I've found so far are [[443]], [[219]], [[550]], [[1026]], [[575]], [[468]], [[592]], [[320]], [[1101]], [[417]], [[713]], [[672]], [[230]], [[436]], [[940]], [[532]], [[649]], [[176]], [[1006]], [[596]] and [[717]], and I'm sure there are many more.  Should we create this category?  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 23:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as [[#Category: Sports|above]], do it. Oh, already did; well, all the better. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Flowcharts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, the line &amp;quot;Randall has made use of flowcharts before.&amp;quot; in today's comic explanation made me want a [[:Category:Flowcharts|flowcharts category]] to navigate into...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it didn't exist, I proceeded to create it, but as the log says, [[User:lcarsos|lcarsos]] deleted such a category in November, saying ''&amp;quot;Insufficient differentiation from Category:Comics with charts, diluting the depth of comics tagged charts&amp;quot;''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't agree with that, and I think we could profit from such a subcategory. I found those pages fitting it:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[94: Profile Creation Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[210: 90's Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[488: Steal This Comic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[627: Tech Support Cheat Sheet]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[844: Good Code]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[851: Na]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[854: Learning to Cook]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1195: Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So? - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 10:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Weell if you're willing to take charge of the category and personally make sure it's added to all relevant comic explanations, go ahead. The usual objection to making new categories is that we admins can't remember all the categories when we're reviewing new explanations, but it's K if you're willing to take up that responsibility yourself. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK. I did it without waiting for further replies, because I think it will be especially profitable today (to viewers).&lt;br /&gt;
:: It doesn't seem a big issue to me if the correct category is not added when a new explanation is made: a passing editor will do it later on... But hey, I'm OK with taking special care of adding pages to this category.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 12:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I just want to add that Cos' view is indeed the appropriate way to work in wikis: there is no concept of a single author for a page, category, or piece of text, and the workload is meant to be distributed among several editors: it is not necessary that any single editor remembers all existing categories, or knows the wiki markup by heart, or knows how to work with all the features of mediawiki, etc. The reason why wikis can be edited by anyone is precisely a recognition that there *will* be errors and any page can be improved somehow. That reasoning against categories should, IMO, be abandoned, or at most only kept as the opinion of some editors. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 22:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isnt there a page which lists all the categories? If not, there should be one, and it should be accessible to all. Such a page could be useful when trying to quick-add categories to comics. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.83.155|117.194.83.155]] 13:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, there is. [[Special:Categories]]. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Of course, there's a gazillion of 'em, over several pages, so I understand any reluctance to add new categories (having just suggested a new one myself which I feel is justified, but knowing that the upkeep needed may be the key point of contention so remaining philosophical about it).&lt;br /&gt;
::A solution perhaps to carry over from another locale that I frequent is to have a &amp;quot;Categories of Character&amp;quot; page, a &amp;quot;Categories of Object&amp;quot; one, perhaps &amp;quot;Categories of Event&amp;quot;, and a &amp;quot;Categories of Publication&amp;quot;.  For each new comic someone can easily check the shorter Character categories list against those present, the Object list against itemsin use, Events, etc, and of course the Publication one has the &amp;quot;Tuesday Comic&amp;quot;/equivalent, and other date-based ones (although isn't that automatic from templated creation?  ...never added a comic, but would imagine it is).  After that it's a trawl through the miscelania categories (perhaps a meta-category just for them?).  But, yeah, a lot of work to set up.  Wouldn't wish it on anyone who wasn't already willing to do it, and I remain an anon-IP person right now so can hardly commit ''myself'' as volunteer maintainer of this. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 17:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: (Barred/banned from?) Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I come here after realising I erroneously posted (in reply) to the Main page Talk, being anonymous (or at least IP-only) and without a list of qualifying articles to support me, just yet, but still wish to put forward the above category before I forget.  There's no apparent equivalent, that I found, but it's definitely a recurring meme.  I should be back (named or otherwise) with my suggested list of members, if someone else doesn't get there first, but I thought I'd start with the placemarker. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 16:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, so I got the bee in my bonnet and spent a few minutes actually looking into this.  Revising &amp;quot;Barred from Conferences&amp;quot; (actually more often &amp;quot;Banned&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;Thrown out of&amp;quot;/equivalent) to just &amp;quot;Conferences&amp;quot;, the subset of comics that I can easily find that are involved is *[[153]], *[[177]], *[[365]], *[[410]], *[[463]], *[[541]], [[545]], [[685]], [[829]] and [[867]], but I'm sure there are more recent ones that I didn't spot/recall.  One alternative title to &amp;quot;Conferences&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Presentations&amp;quot;, and I'm sure if I'd searched for that I'd have found more potential candidates (less some that might ''exit'' the renamed category).  The asterisked ones ''do'' deal with being barred/banned/thrown out/etc, making it still a suitable category in its own right, IMO, but I'll leave it up to your combined musings to decide. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 17:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I add [[690]] to the list. --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Great suggestions! I created [[:Category:Public speaking]] and [[:Category:Banned from conferences]]. I also added [[Wikipedian Protester]] to the mix, of course :) --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 21:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Wishes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://explainxkcd.com/1391/ Several] [http://explainxkcd.com/1086/ comics] [http://explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/152:_Hamster_Ball now] [http://xkcd.com/879/ exist] that talk about wishes - probably more. Should there be a category for this? [[User:Z|Z]] ([[User talk:Z|talk]]) 23:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Doesn't seem significant enough. If you promise to maintain the category you can make it yourself, although it will be cleared out if it gets neglected as new comics are released. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 15:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Artificial Intelligence ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a handful of comics involving Ai - [[1540]], [[1530]], [[1450]] and [[948]] for instance - and maybe it's an idea to give them their own category {{unsigned|Nk22}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The usual objection to new categories is that they get abandoned and are too narrow for other people to think of picking them up. If you're going to own it and update it with new comics, you can make it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 21:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Size Comparisons ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are numerous comics comparing sizes of things.  I can't get a list right now, but off the top of my head, radiation dosages, money, today's comic, and space shuttles in horses. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 19:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adding Ratings for Explanations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1652 today's explanation] excellently written however that is not always the case.   Frequently explanations are walk through of the conversation that are too wordy without any succinct explanation of why or how a strip is funny -- while many of those low quality explanations are not strictly &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; they could benefit from a careful rewrite.   I was wondering if we should add a rating tool such as &amp;quot; ''Was this explanation helpful? yes/no'' &amp;quot; so as to identify explanation that could benefit from improvement without having to be tagged as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot;. [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 17:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We have a rather prominent discussion page for feedback, do we really need an additional add-on for this? I did a little research and found that other wikis use [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Rating semantic rating] and [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ArticleRatings article ratings], which I can install if enough other users want it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Speculation Sections ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often see a lot of speculation and conjecture within the explanation of the comic itself. I don't think it has any place in the explanation but I know many editors enjoy speculating and interpreting the comic and the meaning behind it so I've decided to start this discussion on whether we should provide a section where we can provide different speculations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I am thinking would not be like the discussion page, where comments are made and discussed, but an edited and reviewed section which outlines different speculations and interpretations of the comics themselves and perhaps even the author's intent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course tone and presentation should be held to the same standards of the comic explanation but I think this would be a good way to better organize a review of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been away too long to remember if there are any comic explanations with something like this so I have no idea how well it would work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This part from comic 1642: [[Gravitational Waves]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot; It seems that Randall knew in advance about this announcement because this comic was published on a Thursday, not following the normal publish schedule, to coincide with the announcement &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is well supported, and rather likely correct, conjecture which belongs in the body of the explanation because not only is it backed by strong evidence but it provides background on the comic and the time in which the comic was released and aids in understanding the comic itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, this part from comic 478: [[The Staple Madness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;From just reading the comic by itself, one may presume that in the last panel, Cueball has been stapled to the ceiling (as obvious evidence to Megan that Beret Guy has indeed been abusing her staple gun). According to the comic's official transcript, however, it is in fact God who is speaking.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is almost as equally well supported and certainly a valid interpretation of simply the comic. It is only refuted by the official transcript. I believe it is important to acknowledge and may even be a more humorous interpretation than the one which is provided by the official transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we added a speculation section (or something of the sort) then we would have a place to talk about this interpretation more freely and expound upon it more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 15:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Problem is the whole &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; is actually conjecture. None of us the author, we're all just guessing. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 15:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Many of the current explanations are conjecture, that's true but not every explanation. Providing information on the science or mathematics behind a particular comic is not conjecture. Stating whether the author intended to belittle the field or state that one field is superior over another (unless fairly explicitly stated) is. And there are many things which can be inferred without being simple speculation. Not every comic would need a section like this, and not every comic needs a trivia section, and I'm not ready to start adding this proposed section myself. But I think it should be considered. [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 15:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The intention of the discussion pages was to serve as a place for people to put their conjecture and reaching interpretations of the comics. They're presented alongside the explanation to make people's interpretations more readily visible. Some people may have trouble distinguishing an ungrounded interpretation of a comic from an explanation of it, and they will insert weak text into explanations. If you find something you disagree with, feel free to bring it up in the discussion section and edit it out of the explanation liberally '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unixkcd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone. I was just wondering: is there anything on http://uni.xkcd.com/. Because I was just looking and the only thing I found on Unixkcd is a mention of a bug in [[1350]]. There is not even a mention on the April fools article.&lt;br /&gt;
:There's nothing on this site, there's a couple of novel tidbits on the xkcd site that are at best tangentially related to the comic, as Randall originally intended to make xkcd.com his personal site for hosting his own projects. That particular one doesn't show up in any comics. Also, proposals might not be the best place to put this. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New character category for blonde woman news reporter (from 1699) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From today's comic [[1699: Local News]] I just got the idea that there may be needing a new category for either blonde woman and/or comics with news reports. I posted this [[Talk:1699:_Local_News#New_character_category|post]], in the talk page of that comic. Any comments, and if agreeing that there might be one or two different character categories needed then please suggest what they should be called. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree with Blondie as new character name and with adding a category for news reports. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 00:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree with new character category for Blondie --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 12:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for the replies. Could be nice with a few more chipping in. One issue I just found is  [[Miss Lenhart]] and ambiguous situations like in comic [[59: Graduation]], where I would remove the miss reference. But then miss would be a sub category of Blondie (or Blonde? which Randall cals the girl in 59) as [[Rob]] is for [[Cueball]]... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I think blondie is fine for a name. Miss Lenhart is another character who uses a similar design so I think treating her like Rob is perfectly acceptable. The only thing more I think we should discuss is the role blondie plays in most of the comics (Like how cueball is an everyman, whitehat is often a strawman, Blackhat is blackhat etc.) [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 12:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== fix a page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page Comics featuring Summer Glau is missing:&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/526:_Converting_to_Metric {{unsigned ip|108.162.241.130}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. In the future, you can add categories yourself, just scroll to the bottom and follow the template the others go by. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New xkcd book out. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any chance of posting a section of explanation pages for the cartoons in the new xkcd book, hopefully explaining some of the cryptic red notes? Thanks! {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.102}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Business Plan category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose renaming [[Category:Beret Guy's Business]] into Business Plans, and adding it to [[1721: Business Idea]] [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Business Plan category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose renaming [[Category:Beret Guy's Business]] into Business Plans, and adding it to [[1721: Business Idea]] [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=125362</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=125362"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:15:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Business Plan category */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community portal}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add unexplained strips ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment, browsing through the explanations using the previous and next buttons is interrupted whenever there's an explanation missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think adding a page with the strip fr all of those with a short message like &amp;quot;no one has explained this yet, want to give it a shot?&amp;quot; would make the wiki easier to browse through and will get more strips explained faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think that would happen. If suddenly it was much easier for people to skip over pages that had no explanation, I think they would do exactly that, skip right over it. On the same side of that coin, If suddenly there are no longer any red links on the [[List of all comics]] then everyone perusing that page assumes that all the comics have been explained and don't need to contribute any more. It's astonishing how quickly an [[589: Designated Drivers|embedded]] red link gets an explanation page created simply to get rid of the red link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondarily, ''many'' of the pages created recently aren't being created with their numerical and titular redirects. Without the numerical redirect, the comic template can't find that there is a previous/next comic to link to. Every once in a while somebody will go through and try to notice all the pages that don't have their redirects created but it's an unscientific process that only happens occasionally. If we could get every joe blow that comes in and vomits up a poorly done explanation to create the redirects I wouldn't be quite as annoyed at their lack of show-don't-tell-manship. But, since they can't be bothered to put the date in the comic template, I doubt we'll ever get people to create the redirects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''TL;DR:''' No more red links, no more work gets done on the back catalog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  14:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== xplainkcd.com ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I first saw this site I thought it should definitely be at xplainkcd.com or at least redirect from that url {{unsigned|115.166.22.158|12:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like that idea! --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 13:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah! If it's possible, it would be cool! At least as a redirect. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not technically the same thing, but I just took [http://expxkcd.com http://expxkcd.com]. More explanation &amp;lt;del&amp;gt;is&amp;lt;/del&amp;gt; was given on the website itself. {{User:Grep/signature|05:10, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
::We do that with explainxkcd.com as well, but yay shorter URLs! Mind if I use that for our social media links? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I had no idea that you did that, but sure, go ahead! If you want, I can change any DNS records if you wish to have it go directly to you guys. {{User:Grep/signature|07:16, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::In case you were wondering, I just did the following: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;^/([0-9]+)(/large)?/?$&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; {{User:Grep/signature|07:25, 29 March 2014}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hrm. We're just matching with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;^(\d+)/?$&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. You can keep ownership of the URL if you want, unless you have traffic concerns or whatever and you want us to handle it, which we're very capable of doing. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have made http://www.xkcd.ga and http://www.xkcd.tk both forward to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Is this ok? [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Section style and usage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here and I'm trying to get up to speed with the culture. I have a few questions about how and where to use sections (== this ==). I am more willing to go with (and enforce) whatever norms there are here, but I have not seen them actually discussed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# '''Is it OK to create sections in Discussion pages?''' I have been told no, but there are many examples extant of this usage in this Wiki and indeed in Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
# '''Section title case''' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#Acronyms Wikipedia's style guide] recommends sentence case, not title case. There are many title cased section headers here. &lt;br /&gt;
# '''Links''' I do not have a reference for this but it seems to me putting links in section code (== [[&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;this&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] == ) is bad form. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last note -- it's understood if these bylaws have not yet been written. I can see that a few of you have made a huge personal investment to make this Wiki what it is today, and that is a credit to you all -- this is awesome! As a long-time aficionado of xkcd I applaud your work and look forward to further collaboration.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Smartin|Smartin]] ([[User talk:Smartin|talk]]) 04:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a general rule, we stick to the standard format that existing pages follow, with an optional trivia section below the transcript. Some zealous editors like to add other sections though, which tend to be for the most part unneeded or redundant. If something you want to add doesn't help to explain the comic in some way, but the inclusion of which would somehow still add to the page, *and* it doesn't fall under the trivia category, a new section is warranted. This isn't the case most of the time though, so editors usually fold the content of extraneous sections into &amp;quot;Explanation&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Trivia.&amp;quot; We have no policy on links in titles, and they're allowed so long as they are appropriate; the link is useful and can't be folded into the section itself. And we use title case for titles cuz it just makes sense. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We generally do not (or at least, discourage) use sections on the talk/discussion pages for explanation pages. This is purely for looks. The comic discussion section of the explanation page looks/feels wrong if there are level 2 section breaks in the transclusion. Also, if the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Table_of_contents Table of Contents] starts showing up on a page, such as on [[Click and Drag]] the sections created on the talk page also show up in the TOC. This gets confusing, and this is why we prefer not to use them on explanation talk pages. Everywhere else we follow standard wiki format and do use sections on the discussion pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, I think that links in section titles looks wrong, but I choose not to be the dictator of style in this matter. :p&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please feel free to make edits. The worst that happens is someone reverts your edit. If it's a big enough issue and/or you don't seem to be learning from what people are fixing about your edits someone will leave a comment on your talk page. That's it. We might leave a nasty-gram in the edit summary, but oh well. We only ban for malicious intent. Honestly working to better the wiki is good, even if sometimes we grumble about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  07:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, I just looked at your talk page. I completely forgot that that happened. Don't worry about it. Learning the ropes is part of the experience. Do make edits, and if they're wrong, we'll nudge you in the right direction. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  07:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been moving some trivia sections to directly below the explanation, in order to make it more consistent, and easier to survey and maintain. Often the dividing line between trivia and explanation is not entirely clear, and in articles without a trivia section the end of the explanation very often contains trivia-like information. (e.g. [[1155: Kolmogorov Directions]]) -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
===Title case doesn't make any sense===&lt;br /&gt;
At first sight title case in titles just makes sense. However title case '''never''' makes sense. It's worse than all caps. Besides, only Americans and children like title case. [[Special:Contributions/190.96.48.48|190.96.48.48]] 20:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New character==&lt;br /&gt;
As per [[Talk:1178: Pickup Artists]], the character with hair has appeared in quite a few comics now, and he's starting to become a recurring character. Shall we go ahead with inaugurating him into our list of regular characters, and what name shall we assign him? Current candidate names include Hairy and Harry. Anyone? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like Harry :) --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 01:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cos made a point in the discussion on [[Talk:1178: Pickup Artists]] that Hairy is directly descriptive, whereas Harry is not obvious to visitors. On the other hand, not all names are descriptive ([[Danish]]) and I think this wiki is entitled to create some xkcd-in-culture, and not just describe. And Harry is quite funny.&lt;br /&gt;
::I wonder: has [[Randall]] ever called him anything at all in the transcript? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 21:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, he's not named in a any official transcripts, but he's already called Harry in quite a few comic explanations. Then again, I do like having a more descriptive name for him. Shall we hold this up to a vote? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think we should wait a little for a few more viewpoints to crop up. Also, can someone link to some more comics he's been featured in? I've got [[1028: Communication]], [[1027: Pickup Artist]] and [[1178: Pickup Artists]]. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 23:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I actually like what that anon said: ''Curly''.  Second choice: Hairy (being descriptive, a la Black Hat, Beret, Cueball, etc.)  While there's talk about in-culture, we've done that with the names Cueball, Beret, etc.  It's my opinion that the only names that should be &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; proper names are those that are named in the comic.  Megan, Miss Lenhart, etc.  Danish (as is discussed below) isn't truly a proper name, but you could argue it's a meta-description (one attributed by Black hat.)  So that's my vote: yes for '''Curly''' or '''Hairy''', no for Harry.  [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 05:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's right, [[Danish]] is not descriptive, but 1/ that name was suggested because the character [[515: No One Must Know|was called that way in the comic]], which is a tiny bit like a name given by the author (at least more than Harry which we have completely made up), and 2/ in that case it's hard to find a descriptive term: use something that revolves around her black hair (her only descriptive feature), and you easily mix up with [[Megan]]; the only graphical difference is that her hair is ''long'', but what kind of name can you make out of that?&lt;br /&gt;
:::For this new character, I suggest Hairy because it comes as the easy solution with every advantage: descriptive, easy to understand, and it's not ugly... I actually see no reason to resort to a made-up name like Harry.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 22:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: '''Alright. So the discussion's been had, and the most oft recommended name appears to be Hairy. All in favor, say aye. If more than 1/3 of editors agree and we have more than 6 votes, Hairy it is.''' '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' [[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 06:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye''' to Hairy. [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 15:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. Harry would be a nice nod to the fact that he's actually hairy, but indeed it's better to avoid inside jokes. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. I'm convinced! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 17:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Aye'''. Hairy. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 20:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hooray! We now have a [[:Category:Comics featuring Hairy]], with four pages already! Does anyone feel compelled to create &amp;quot;[[Hairy]]&amp;quot;, with a brief description and a nice profile pic like the other characters? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 22:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ambiguous characters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been thinking about the problem of the ambiguity of characters. &amp;quot;Is this really Cueball even though he has an eye and half a nose?&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;This is very likely ''not'' x.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Darnit, these arn't Cueballs, these are Randall and his friends!&amp;quot;, and so on. The character ambiguity is standard for xkcd (not less so in the early ones), and comes from the very loose or &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; way Randall uses his characters to be whatever he needs at the moment.  It's simply often impossible for us to know whether he had e.g. &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; or himself in mind, when drawing a particular comic (and I'd say: probably often both).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to suggest that we in general have a likewise rather loose policy towards including characters in the categories for the comics. So that reasonably ambiguous cases should be included in e.g. (does she have a ponytail?) This is not because I believe this or that to really be this or that; I just don't believe in objective truth (here!). I feel that when doing research :) on a character, the borderline cases are often the most interesting ones, and you want to be able to find them through the &amp;quot;Comics featuring miss x&amp;quot;!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I came to think this through now, when I wanted to (and did) list two comics with [[Miss Lenhart]] (?) where she was drawn but not named. Any thoughts on this in general? Other case studies? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 21:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My take has always been that [[Cueball]], for example, has not been a specific character.  There is not ''a'' cueball, per se, distinct from any other cueball... indeed, there are several comics with several cueballs in-frame, and that is the point.  I see the cueball character as a wildcard character (pun intended) ready to stand in for anybody (and ''not'' necessarily just Randall; I think those readers who suggest &amp;quot;this ''is'' Randall&amp;quot; are missing the point; he's way more META than that...)  [[Megan]], while slightly less generic, still remains the female wild-card significant-other, while Curls seems to be a not-significant-other female used to illustrate a relationship that is transient.  Other characters come and go, and when it's important to visually distinguish them from others in the frame, they're given additional characteristics, to wit [[Hairy]], [[Ponytail]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, that viewpoint is not commonly held, so I daresay I'm in the minority here.&lt;br /&gt;
:-- [[User:IronyChef|IronyChef]] ([[User talk:IronyChef|talk]]) 14:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Note at the top, about the server error ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''This thread was moved to [[MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've removed &amp;quot;add a comment!&amp;quot; from Discussion heading ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This does move it to above the line, and the rule stops early. Undo my change if that's more bothering than when the TOC is displayed as &amp;quot;add a comment!Discussion&amp;quot;... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how to automatically treat level 2 headers as level 3. That may be why Discussion was a level 1 heading earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually I now noticed there was a short edit war at {{tl|comic discussion}} over whether it should be a level 1 heading, just for this reason. [[User:Waldir]] seems to have conceeded... [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 11:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: No edit war, hence no (intentional) concession. I reverted a change once, and didn't notice the change being re-implemented by another user. In any case, it is irrelevant now since we actively discourage using headers in talk pages precisely so that they don't display in the TOC for the main comic page, where the discussion page is transcluded to (see the discussion [[#Section style and usage|above]]). This might not scale well for comics that generate lots of discussion. It might be worth discussing our customs (and perhaps write them down somewhere) before performing such changes. What do others think? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time: The Table ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now on the page [[1190: Time]], we have a whole bunch of tables in the form image-time-hash. The tables take up heaps of vertical space and all have to be collapsed to even be remotely traversible. I propose that we aggregate all the images into one table after Time ends, like so:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable plainlinks table-padding&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Media:time.png|00:00]]||01/00:00||[[Media:time.png|10:00]]||01/10:00||[[Media:time.png|20:00]]||01/20:00||[[Media:time.png|30:00]]||AND MOAR SAMPLE DATAS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Media:time.png|00:30]]||01/00:30||[[Media:time.png|10:30]]||01/10:30||[[Media:time.png|20:30]]||01/20:30||[[Media:time.png|30:30]]||AND MOAR SAMPLE DATAS&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hash values aren't really a part of the comic, they're gibberish for the most part and they take up space that could be used to compact the table, as shown above. Even if we are conservative and make the table only five columns wide to account for smaller screens, we've divided scrolling time by five and eliminated much of the need for annoying collapsed tables and section headers for each day. Constructing the table shouldn't be particularly hard either, as all our current data is in nice regular tables with clear patterns that are easy enough to parse through. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm putting this here because the organization of the frame entries would be unintuitive and difficult to change from the edit window, which would make it a poor choice when we're still expanding it and don't even know how long the comic will continue for. It's merely a space-saving trick for after we're sure that the comic is over. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh and it'd be really nice if other people could also upload images if you're awake and a new one rolls by. There's gaps in the image record every time I wake up, and I dun likey. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 20 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good work so far; go ahead make it better! :) –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Featured Explanation, and Archival?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia has featured content. Now that we are close to reaching the goal of all comics explained, I think it makes more sense to have a &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; which would serve as a sort of a marker for a complete and good explanation. Many comics, and almost all charts are not fully explained/not a good quality explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We should set up archival of discussion of the most discussed pages, like this one. Its not very pleasing to see comments from July 2012 still lying around here. It becomes hectic at some point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just my 2 cents, feel free to discuss. Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/117.194.88.180|117.194.88.180]] 13:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We dedicate this wiki to explaining xkcd, and we do actually have a featured comic feature; it changes every week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and we usually manage to fill out the explanation for it within an hour or so of it going up. The most recent comic tends to be the one that most people visiting the wiki care about, so we give it prime space on the front page so they can find it easily. xkcd updates frequently enough that there isn't really that big of a time window for us to feature an article on our front page. Also, we're a volunteer project with quite a bit less manpower than Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
:We do need to archive talk pages though. Some of these are getting ridiculously long. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Davidy22. Archiving topics can be done by anyone, by moving resolved threads to the portal section's corresponding [[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals|talk page]]. We could start with the threads marked &amp;quot;✓ Closed&amp;quot;. [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason I asked for a &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; was because many of the comic explanations we currently have are sub-par, and we're almost at our initial goal of explaining all comics. A &amp;quot;featured explanation&amp;quot; would drive our editors towards the goal of having complete and good explanation towards all comics, and would allow us to know which explanations need elaboration.&lt;br /&gt;
:: P.S. My definition of complete explanation would be - To have a good explanation, To have all categories relevant, To link to any comics related and To explain any technical portions of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[Special:Contributions/117.194.82.49|117.194.82.49]] 07:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That message on the front page is going to link to all the pages marked by the incomplete template. If you find an unsatisfactory explanation, please mark it with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{incomplete}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: By my definition, I think all comics will be incomplete. An incomplete template will be focused more towards improving the worst explanations, while a featured one will be to improve the best ones. Since we already have the former, we should focus on the latter. Just my 2 cents. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.85.82|117.194.85.82]] 06:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Split the list of all comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[List of all comics]] is getting larger and larger, which makes it hard to read and hard to edit. How about splitting into parts, say [[List of all comics/1-1000]], [[List of all comics/1001-2000]], etc., or something to that effect? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 17:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Done. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.88.176|117.194.88.176]] 10:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Great job, thanks! [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And I've added back [[List of all comics (full)]], which allows, for example, listing all comics by alphabetical order.[[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 17:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidebar ads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Moved from [[Talk:Main Page]] –– [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are they generating significant money? The ones I see are pretty sleazy looking and/or scammy - &amp;quot;Power Companies Hate this Device! - click here to break the laws of thermodynamics!&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Debt relief program click here to lose more money&amp;quot;. How much  money are they generating? Can you set any selections to remove the sleazy ads?  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 18:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have sleazy sidebar ads? Since when? Thanks Google Chrome and AdBlock, I had no idea! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 07:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::People give 20$ a pop to get a bunch of clicks on explainxkcd, and Jeff uses that money to buy a faster server with a hard drive that doesn't have less space than a public toilet with an elephant in it. It'd be really nice if you didn't turn on adblock, the money is appreciated. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's a question of me not turning it off specifically every time I visit this site. More importantly, I do think people would be more likely to click the &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; if it weren't irrelevant ads around it. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 19:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Generating money is a great thing. Getting &amp;quot;20$ a pop to get a bunch of clicks&amp;quot; is a bit unclear. Do the ads only generate revenue when clicked on? So EXKCD only gets money when someone actually falls for the sleazy ads? I know lots of people do not like Google - but at least their adsense stuff is relevant to the content of the website, which might generate some legitimate traffic for a legitimate advertiser....  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 11:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Welllll, I didn't pick the ad supplier. You could bring it up with [[User talk:Jeff|Jeff]] if you want, I think he picked the ad provider on basis of which one had a mediawiki plugin or something. If you can link Jeff to a quick and easy way to put adsense on mediawiki, he should change it quickly enough. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I also gather then that they are only a temporary thing? -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 08:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Until we can buy a server that doesn't poop itself every time a new comic is released, the ads are staying. If you want them to go away sooner, throw more money at Jeff. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The ads are crap.  For sure.  Wish I didn't have to run them, but I don't trust donations alone to hold up continually some better hosting.  The ads really don't bring in that much $$$.  I had google adsense before, but Google shutdown my adsense account for unnamed reason after 1 week.  This new ad service is way sketchier.  If you all think they don't have a place here, I'll ax 'em. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Thanks for the info Jeff. How much ad money are we talking about? Is it calculated on how many ads are displayed or how many are clicked-through? How close to the goal is the server fund? How about a Kickstarter campaign for the server? $10 gets your name on a thankyou webpage or something like that. [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 17:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::: It ain't much, last I looked it was $2 or $3 in 2 weeks.  I believe it is based on clicks, it is not nearly as clear as Google adsense.  I'm not really interested in doing a Kickstarter.  I think the donations will cover the initial start up, I just want to be able to cover the monthly costs as well. A few things are still up in the air. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Can you find a way to show the donations and ad income on the site, to make it transparent? ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: How about a donation amount that you'll take to turn it (the annoying unethical scummy ads) off for a year? Give me a dollar value and I might step up for the good of us all!  [[User:J-beda|J-beda]] ([[User talk:J-beda|talk]]) 16:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic transparency ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is very important: How can we make the donations and ad-income transparent, so that we all can see when and how much money is coming in, and how far we are from reaching our goal? – [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 00:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds fine to me, I think I can put something together. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, may I bump this issue? Or maybe you have done something, and I missed it? Anyway, I would still appreciate it! –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 17:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Numberssss. I'll get on with it, just need less homework and a few more numbers. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to respectfully file a complain. I find the banner advertisement of background checks distasteful. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 05:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] - I am the one who approved those ads.  But, since you have filed a complaint about them, I have gone ahead and removed them.  Thanks. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 12:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thank you. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 03:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in transcripts to improve accuracy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the transcripts, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[lines]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; are being changed to [lines] in order to avoid auto-linking. Why not just surround these with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tags and avoid the problem entirely? --[[User:Epauley|Epauley]] ([[User talk:Epauley|talk]]) 04:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Because it takes less time to type and single brackets are just as readable as double brackets to visitors. It's also a bit more readable in the editor. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Strip Title ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For someone who commonly browses explainxkcd in place of xkcd, and hence often see the strips for the first time here rather than the parent site, I find it somewhat odd that the 'Title Text' is so poorly displayed given how critical it can be to the strip.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that, while retaining the given name (perhaps moving it top left), the title text be enlarged and relocated to being over the strip as originally intended. {{unsigned ip|175.41.133.18}}&lt;br /&gt;
:The title text is placed very well at bottom of the image.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 07:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would have to agree with Dgbrt, it's placed nicely at the bottom, and there is no need for it to be moved. My reasoning is that you never actually read the title text first, you read it last. Making it &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;text-align: left;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does not make sense, because the image is centered (just like on xkcd.com). I also believe that there is no need for it to be re-sized, mainly due to the fact that it is slightly larger than the title text (for me, at least). {{User:Grep/signature|05:18, 08 September 2013}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Plus, if you hover over the image, it's the same as on xkcd.com {{User:Grep/signature|06:13, 08 September 2013}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I also agree with Dgbrt and Grep. The title text is kind of a bonus and should not be emphasized more than on the original page. On the original site you only see it before the image, if you have very slow internet access (or very fast eyes) --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sections in talk pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a reason why there are no sections in talk pages? It is not a very big deal, but especially for longer talk pages it would make editing be much handier, especially when using the preview function (not having to find the section every time). Also it automatically adds a description to the history (thus makes it more easy to look for certain edits, or decide by just looking at the [[Special:RecentChanges]], if a comment should concern you. --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:When discussion pages are transcluded by the comic discussion template, section headers carry over from talk pages and bad things happen. Using ; to denote headers instead of equals signs works well, and doesn't share transclusion pain. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any chance we can add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite/Cite.php cite.php] to this wiki? Most pages don't need it, but some comics take on a life of their own and being able to add reference tags would be really helpful for those. [[User:LadyMondegreen|LadyMondegreen]] ([[User talk:LadyMondegreen|talk]]) 01:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Cite has been added to the wiki.  Thanks for the suggestion! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 01:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stylized writing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understand that this wiki isn't as formal as wikipedia or sites like that but it seems that there are a few questionable practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The use of questions - when a non-rhetorical or unnecessary question is entered into the explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Extremely painted/biased view points - when there is obvious bias in the tone of the explanation of the contributor, in other &lt;br /&gt;
words; a lack of neutrality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Extreme repetition/rehashing - the explanation restates things and makes for a long and tedious read when a more straight-forward explanation is possible and clearer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The general informality - &amp;quot;This one's an easy one&amp;quot; &amp;quot;This is simple&amp;quot; &amp;quot;this one's straightforward&amp;quot; &amp;quot;You're an idiot for not understanding this one&amp;quot; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Many other practices that make the explanation hard to read, difficult to understand, or plain ugly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that there are disparaging view points on how a comic should be explained, but please let's clean up the site a bit, acknowledge each view point and report on all of them and then tighten up the sloppy writing. Carry out arguments in the talk section, not the explanation. Perhaps we could first try to say the majority view point on the interpretation and then write the alternate explanations, of course this would bring up the debate on which is the majority explanation. Either way, more complete, logical explanations should be given more credence. --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with 2-5. 1, on the other hand, is sometimes useful and can contribute the to explanation, although 1 is still a very good point. I would say that you should edit it to have &amp;quot;arguments in the talk&amp;quot; be a 6th point as well. Unfortunately, though, we are not all logical, comic-understanding machines here, so minor deviations of these rules are still to be expected. But I think that overall, these are good rules, even if 2/3 are sort of part of 5.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]], please sign your post with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;float: right;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{User:Grep/signature|23:55, 22 October 2013}}&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand the use of questions in certain parts. And it was probably better to put the others as sub-categories to five but I wanted to show some common things that can be easily fixed. I know that some explanations require a lot of text and extensive research because of the abstract subjects Randall deals with and that it's difficult to be completely standardized but I think it would be good for us to try to come up with some general things to try to avoid to help the explanations &amp;quot;flow&amp;quot; --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 00:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Most of that isn't intentional, it's just an awful lot of labor to copy check all the explanations. I've been going through all the current articles and fixing consistency issues, the worst being wrong transcript/title text/dates and the most benign being wikilinks, spelling and trailing spaces. I'm at 682 so far, but my next pass will be on actual language and content, and it'll probably take longer. It takes a while though, and you can totally work on improving language in articles if you want to. Some explanations were pulled from the old blog, some were written and just got lost in the changelog. Copy editing everything we have so far is a very labor-intensive job, and the only way to really deal with it is to knuckle down and do it, or form a wikiproject and hope to heaven that visitors feel charitable enough to join in on it. I'd *probably* push to finish up all our incomplete articles first though, just because that's more directly related to the purpose of the site; tone and style probably comes second to having correct explanations. That doesn't mean you can't do it yourself, it's just that I'll probably only dedicate the subheader on the main page to one project at a time and our current biggest bugbear hasn't been solved yet. I could put up a sitenotice to see if that speeds the process up any. I'll do that when I get back home. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Easy redirect to comic? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been thinking, and there is one thing that would make navigating to the explained comics easier. My method of browsing is I'll see the comic on xkcd.com first, and if there is something curious about it that I don't quite understand, I'll come here. Sometimes it can be a bit troublesome, going to the homepage and then navigatiing to the right comic. Not too bad, but I'd like an easy way to go direct. So I was thinking, what if you had a redirect such that if you typed in, for example, www.explainxkcd.com/505, you would get redirected to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=505:_A_Bunch_of_Rocks. That would mean that you could get to the comic just from adding an &amp;quot;explain&amp;quot; to the start of the xkcd.com URL. I don't know if that is at all possible, but it would be pretty handy if it happened. Thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 03:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#Redirect_from_explainxkcd.com.2F1234 That's actually already on the to-do list.] I'm testing it right now and we should have it up soon. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Awesome :) [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 03:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whoop, forgot to mark this as complete. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:::: Done! Copy this and drag it to your bookmarks bar: |javascript: var url = document.URL; document.location = url.replace('xkcd.com','explainxkcd.com');| {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.29}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The feature requested here has also long since been implemented. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Increase support via prominent display of copyright and license for text submitted to explainxkcd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
XKCD itself is rather liberally licensed, and gets lots of good will from that.  As it says on the bottom of every page &amp;quot;This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.&amp;quot;  For details see [http://xkcd.com/license.html xkcd - A Webcomic - License].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I found nothing on most pages of explainxkcd about copyright or licensing, and it discouraged me from contributing or donating.  Finally, as I was writing this proposal up, I found a link on the editing page here: [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Copyrights explain xkcd:Copyrights - explain xkcd] saying that &amp;quot;''The Explain XKCD wiki is generally licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license (CC-BY-SA-3.0)''&amp;quot;.  That notice should be more prominent on the site, with at least a link on each page.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 15:27, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This should be mentioned at the main page, including a reference to the xkcd origin.&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW: NO DOUBLE SPACES after a sentence. Are you US guys still using a typewriter? It's not rendered at a web page and stupid like Gallons, Miles, Foots, and much more unique US behaviours. But that's just a joke beside.&lt;br /&gt;
:The licence hint is much more important, you are just correct.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Added a creative commons icon to the footer of the page, next to the powered by mediawiki button. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Comics Bot ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would there be need for such a thing?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.52|108.162.231.52]] Synthetica&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice idea, I never thought about that before. I will do some tests on existing comics to check if this could reduce the current number of error posts for a new article. When that is ready and working I will talk to some admins. My bot account [[User:DgbrtBOT|DgbrtBOT]] was originally intended for [[1190: Time]] picture uploads, but I never have used it because Time was over. Creating the new pages should be easy in general, avoiding errors will cost some more work. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you can get dgbrtBOT to do that, that'd help us an awful lot. It'd allow us to get rid of the ifexist cases in template:LATESTCOMIC as well, since the bot could change automatically that whenever a new comic goes up. It'll also help us get new comics down almost the moment they pop up, since the bot could sample several times a minute until a comic is posted. So long as it gets the general pattern right so that we have a correct page set up, we're good. An admin can come in sometime later to clean up categories and image urls and other piddly easy-to-fix details. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will work on this next weekend, just local scripts and no updates here. I also will talk about my results before any automatic updates will be activated. My first focus is on creating the new pages in the general pattern, LATESTCOMIC and also the page &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are maybe a bonus later. And of course all my scripts will be open source.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The first version is ready and I will test it at my local wiki. If everything goes well I could activate it for Wednesday (2013-11-13). LATESTCOMIC and &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are on my roadmap, but first I want produce correct new pages here. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:00, 10 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Righty ho. Here goes. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:36, 10 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Even when my automatic local wiki test did fail today, just a damn wrong password, I will activate the bot here for Wednesday. It will only run from 4:00 PM until 8:00 PM UTC. You will not see my possible updates at [[Special:RecentChanges]] unless you click ''Show bots'' at the top of that page. LATESTCOMIC and &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; are not covered, but this is at my TODO list until this test will be successful. Give me a '''GO''' or '''NO-GO''' for this test.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Easily a GO, I'll be ready to clean up if anything goes wrong. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So be ready on Wednesday for the clean up. My worst case is ''it simply does not work'', second worse scenario is still that I could delete some contend already posted here, but I'm trying to avoid this. ''Huston'', the countdown clock is counting. I'm joking about this because I really want to be confident about this ''BOT'' or ROBOT or uncontrolled action here.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The bot can't do anything that I can't reverse. I can even restore a backup from an hour before the bot's edits if it manages to break the database. How quickly does it poll xkcd, by the way? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First live test here (comic 1289). Please delete this page: [[Simple_Answers:_1289]]. Since my local wiki did not provide this templates I could not see this error before. In general the bot will update pages differ to any existing pages, but when it is not changed no update will happen. I'm fixing this errors at my script and do a second test here soon. I want to see it's producing correct pages until the bot will do it's work when I'm sleeping.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, test are done here, BOT is scheduled for the next update. Polling is every five minutes on Mon, Wed, and Fri from 04:00 until 08:00 UTC. Let's see how it will work.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Couldja ramp that up to once/twice a minute, push the start time back by an hour, and the end time by a few hours? Also, is it possible to terminate it once it finds a comic for a certain day? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:45, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It worked! Though it posted the comic 5 minutes past post time. We has technology now, we can afford to poll faster and closer, yeah? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Uhh, it worked... I will increase the polls when I'm more confident about the release times. Today it was approx. 05:00 UTC (GMT) or 01:00 EST (Randall's time zone). Looks like he is still at daylight saving time, would have been 00:00 EDT. The polls will be increased to one minute when I'm sure about the Standard Release Time (SRT). Next steps for the next update on Friday are:&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The LATESTCOMIC template.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The LATESTCOMIC template is included for the next run, it just simply has to return a number. But it's still the most critical part because if it does not work the Main Page is broken. I will change this to a better solution using that IFEXIST syntax soon. The list of all comics is still at my ToDo list. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The desired content of the LATESTCOMIC template should be just the comic number. If we can get out of having to poll multiple IFEXIST statements to find the latest comic, that would be a fantastic boon to our server performance. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 04:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK, it did work today so I will not change this. Next step is the list for all comics.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 11:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Next run will include an update on the &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot; page. I'm crossing my fingers. When this update is also successful I will document my Bot at the Bot user page [[User:DgbrtBOT]]. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, I forgot this detail: The bot is starting at 00:00 EST (RLT - Randall local time), which is 04:00 UTC and 05:00 MET for me. It polls every 5 minutes until 23:55 MET (22:55 UTC, 18:55 RLT) the main page until a new comic is found. I do not poll the comic number because I want to avoid 404 message logs at the servers.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Something went wrong there. That's gonna need fixing. I am enjoying the looks of the apparently faster polling though. Maybe you could also set the start time to 00:00:05 EST to catch the on-time xkcd releases within ten seconds? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh, what a mess. I will do some more tests at my local wiki. At the next time I will do a check against the number from the LATESTCOMIC template, only the next number will be processed. The test against my local history did fail because of some cleanups after testings.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 08:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't like mess. So the BOT got many more checks before posting here but the bot was starting at 05:00 local time for me. I'm really asleep at that time. The mess here was covered, but I do need another GO for the next attempt. Otherwise I will just do a test to my local wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
No GO so far, my next test will run only at my local wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My script is here: [https://github.com/dgbrt/explainXKCD_update explainXKCD_update]. At my current test &amp;quot;explainxkcd.com&amp;quot; is commented out and &amp;quot;localhost&amp;quot; is active. Since I don't like mess and the bot does act while I am sleeping the next update must be done manually here. I'm hoping the bot will be ready for the next update on Friday.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bot is ready for Friday, everything went smooth at my last local test today. The bot did find the latest comic at 04:05 UTC and all essential pages were properly created. So I will activate it for this site again. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Bot did work as expected. So I name it release 1.1337, the next planed release will be 2.1337 (beta) because of this two issues:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Include any categories below this line.&amp;quot; will be removed because it doesn't make any sense any more.&lt;br /&gt;
*BETA: I want to use the full template features at [[List of all comics]], just ensuring that the pictures are working properly. No need for this at the most comics, but the BOT doesn't cover all possibilities on corrupt file names like we have had in &amp;quot;Pi vs. Tau&amp;quot;. The picture was without that dot. My bot just shows the real link it did upload here.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure we will have some issues on this bot, but for general pages it should work. So the bot will be active on Mon,Wed,Fri from 0:00 EST (or EDT) every five minutes until it did found a new comic, on success the bot does not poll any more.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Aww, it's a bot. It doesn't need to rest or take time off to do other stuff. It can totally poll once or more times per minute. Also, if you set the start time to a few seconds after midnight, Randall time, when he uploads a comic on-time, you'll get it within a few seconds as opposed to having to wait for the next polling. As for the image names, maybe you could convert spaces in the comic name to underscores, compare the two comic names you have and use that to decide which version of the template to use? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have to avoid that the bot is running twice, Internet Timeouts and more. And the comics are also published later sometimes. Look at my release [https://github.com/dgbrt/explainXKCD_update 1.1337], release 2.1337 will be later, Maybe I should start at 2 minutes after 0:00, but let's see right now how the bot does work. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 00:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Uhh, what a huge discussion here. The bot will get a major update soon: Scheduler does start it once and until a comic is found and uploaded it here or an other limit is reached (maybe the end of the day) the bot will poll by a small delay. But every poll is still an entire download from the main page, When a new comic is found bot stops.&lt;br /&gt;
:Why, you could use http://xkcd.com/info.0.json, right?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.52|108.162.231.52]] 07:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Synthetica&lt;br /&gt;
::The BOT performs perfect and I prefer to analyze the original page. A title text like the one from today (a text showing a link) will be covered in the future.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 10:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
A great enhancement would be also covering a new comic like 1190 Time was. I'm looking forward on this, some ideas, it does require a complete analyse of the page and then finding some strange content. &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Require description for 'incomplete' tags ==&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to fix some of the incompletes, but several explanation pages I've come across are tagged incomplete without any reason given. The reason should be a required part of the tag. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.223|173.245.52.223]] 03:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This incomplete tags are just older than the recent change of that template. Current adds require a description, but it's not easy to figure out all that old reasons. If someone does find a reason, please just add it. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Should there be a subwiki to cover the shop links that appear above the comic?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current one (as of writing) is [http://imgs.xkcd.com/store_news/store_gd_b11_1ze4.png] but this is a different than the usual, and there was also a third in between these.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rsranger65|Rsranger65]] ([[User talk:Rsranger65|talk]]) 06:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those are very ephemeral. They aren't going to exist for very long, I don't know how valuable it would be to archive that stuff. We could probably do it, but having to figure out another naming convention and all for advertisements doesn't appeal to me at the current moment. If you can flesh it out, I'd love to see how you think we should do it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 07:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, I think we need a name for the character with a goatee and glasses in comics [[435: Purity]], [[796: Bad Ex]] and [[964: Dorm Poster]] as well as possibly others. Edit: oh and I suggest Goatee and Glasses Guy, but I'm open for suggestions Edit 2: also in [[826: Guest Week: Zach Weiner (SMBC)]] Halfhat {{unsigned|Halfhat}}&lt;br /&gt;
edit 3: Another sighting [[954: Chin-Up Bar]] [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 16:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: In the transcript, he is called &amp;quot;Person with Glasses and a Goatee&amp;quot; --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;quot;Glasses Guy&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Goatee Guy&amp;quot; are both probably descriptive enough! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I was thinking, maybe at some point we should do the comics in the ''What If?'' section, like [http://what-if.xkcd.com/imgs/a/36/cornstarch_bitcoins.png this one.] [[User:Halfhat|Halfhat]] ([[User talk:Halfhat|talk]]) 20:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Start creating the pages for them! --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think I can start creating one or two pages for What If, if that helps... [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 16:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: If nobody has any problem with it, I'm gonna give it a try later. :) [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 13:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I thought they were already pretty self-explanatory though. Also, how are we gonna organize and present them? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 16:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I totally agree with David: Read the entire What-If page and follow the links provided by Randall. No one of us can do that better in depth. But an overview page for this site is maybe not a bad idea, we just need a proper link here — a link at the main menu on the left. Translations to other languages are just another issue. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, I was thinking of an overview, summarizing the contents and discoveries of each what if page. Not to mention, we could also organize what if pages by categories, such as physics/love.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you like me to post here an example of what I would write? That way we can decide if it's worthy of creating an actual page. [[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 12:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Adding pages for What If? posts would be very helpful. Although the articles themselves are obviously self-explanatory, there are almost as many subtle references, running gags, and in-jokes in What If? posts these days as in the comics themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
I often visit explain xkcd when I feel like I'm missing an inside joke or a pop culture reference in a comic, and it would be very helpful to many people (especially those from other cultures/subcultures) to have the same service.&lt;br /&gt;
For example, today's What If? contains multiple allusions to the Superman Movie, a running Citation Needed joke, and a whole comic that is a not-so-subtle dig at Elon Musk and the Hyperloop. It would be awesome if the community here at explainxkcd could tackle stuff like that.&lt;br /&gt;
Anonymous 20:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree. I don't understand the mouseover text on the first image in &amp;quot;Snow Removal&amp;quot;, for example. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 22:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole point of the transcripts is to have those who are unable to view images to still be able to read the comic, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then why is it required to stick to strictly official transcripts, where sometimes rewriting them slightly would make them flow better or otherwise get the ideas across better? I've tried rewriting a few, but they get reverted. I think that having easier-to-understand transcripts would be more important than strictly following official transcripts; what do you think? (For a few examples, see [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=207:_What_xkcd_Means&amp;amp;diff=60061&amp;amp;oldid=57400 this edit] and [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=995%3A_Coinstar&amp;amp;diff=59862&amp;amp;oldid=57316 this edit]. [[User:Zowayix|Zowayix]] ([[User talk:Zowayix|talk]]) 17:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We use the original transcript to try and deduce original author intent if it's unclear from the image. I remember one comic where Beret Guy was off in the distance and it was difficult to distinguish him from the image, but the official transcript said it was him. We don't stick to the original transcript if it's obviously wrong, or it has typographical errors: see [[Laser Scope]]. Those edits seem to be mainly targeted at language and clarity, and should be fine. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would it be helpful to have another (optional) section for expanding on the official transcripts? I too think it could be helpful, especially for complex images (such as 1079/United Shapes [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1079]). Or does supplemental description belong in the Explanation sections? Cheers. [[User:Karenb|Karenb]] ([[User talk:Karenb|talk]]) 23:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Naaah, how many people even know there's an original transcript? If the original is wrong, change it. If your additions begin to verge on explanatory, move eet to the trivia/explanation sections. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Characters in this Comic&amp;quot; section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should there be a &amp;quot;Characters in this Comic&amp;quot; section in each comic explanation? (I feel like this should be longer but don't have anything else to say.) [[User:Z|Z]] ([[User talk:Z|talk]]) 23:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a Category section at the bottom of each comic. Just scroll down and you will see any character belonging to a specific comic. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adding the Radiation chart from XKCD ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi &lt;br /&gt;
As there are already other comics with explanations even though they are not part of the number system.&lt;br /&gt;
This one does not seem to have any yet:&lt;br /&gt;
http://xkcd.com/radiation/&lt;br /&gt;
And as it is very alike the Money strip (the unexplained of the week) so I think it should be explained as well.&lt;br /&gt;
If you agree please add it as I'm not sure how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best regards&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reddit comments? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There should be a link in each comics explanation page somewhere linking to the comment section for the relevant comic on /r/xkcdcomic or reddit.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reddit comments page isn't ''that'' close to what we do though. If this is more popular, we'll do it, though there'll need to be a fair bit of post-hoc editing since I don't think there's a standard URL scheme for all the past comics. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not insulting new users ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am writing a response to a vulnerability assessment.  I have included a link to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936 noting that it contains a good explanation of the relative security of passwords vs passphrases.  I just noticed that the top of that page contains &amp;quot;Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.&amp;quot;  Looks like I'll have to find a different site to link to.  --[[User:Pascal|Pascal]] ([[User talk:Pascal|talk]]) 17:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  While I'm sure it can seem cute or funny in various circles, that text has always seemed immature and inappropriate to me, and I'm sure to many folks we'd like to invite to the site. I suggest that it be changed.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 19:52, 23 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The XKCD  http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/936 suggestion for password is actually not that good. [http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/62832/is-the-oft-cited-xkcd-scheme-no-longer-good-advice read here] for some more discussion.   [[Special:Contributions/162.158.253.6|162.158.253.6]] 23:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I also agree.  I'm not here because I'm stupid, I'm here because I don't know something and I'm hoping this site can help.  It's off putting to have that text there, and there's no benefit to it.  What about just repeating the thing at the top of XKCD.com: &amp;quot;Romance, Sarcasm, Math, and Language: Explained&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RSS feed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there an RSS feed (or some equivalent) of Explain XKCD available? It's helpful for those using feed readers, and superior to the primary XKCD RSS since there are explanations and the mouse over text is transcribed for the lazy. Thanks [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.154|108.162.219.154]] 08:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:NewPages&amp;amp;feed=atom&amp;amp;hideredirs=1&amp;amp;limit=90&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;namespace=0&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;feed=&amp;amp;tagfilter= Why yes, we do!] It's the regular new pages log that all wikis have. It's a little ugly at the moment, and sometimes junk gets in there when a bot chucks spam at us, so a nicer feed is in the works, but the linked one should do you excellently for now. When the nice one is done, you'll see it in the sidebar below the &amp;quot;Help&amp;quot; button. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Navigation Pane Link - Categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about having a link to the &amp;quot;Special:Categories&amp;quot; page in the navigation pane?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A fair amount of effort has gone into categorising the comics, and at the moment it isn't particularly obvious how to browse by category. Is this worth doing?{{unsigned|Pudder}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Space on the sidebar is on a premium. I dunno, I'd probably be against it, but I want to hear what other admins say as well. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 16:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate realities what if would benefit from a wiki entry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The what if entry from the end of November 2014 providing excerpts from alternate reality what ifs would benefit from an explain page. &lt;br /&gt;
I suspect these may have been typos that have been made into jokes, but some of the humor might not be apparent to all.  &lt;br /&gt;
I doubt I have access (or maybe know how) to set it up myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:  Made it. Check out [[What If: 120: Alternate Universe What Ifs]]. [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 09:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We don't actually have a structure for what if pages in general, so I'll have to take that down, but when we do we can make pages for every what if. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secondary URLs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have made http://www.xkcd.ga and http://www.xkcd.tk both forward to http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page. Is this ok? [[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:While we probably won't advertise them because we can't guarantee the uptime of third-party URLs, and they add an additional redirect layer and lack our shortened URL features, you're free to purchase and link URLs to us independently. We are not owned by Randall and as such cannot claim to actually be xkcd, so I'm not hugely comfortable with you using the plain name &amp;quot;xkcd&amp;quot; to link to us; a url in the format http://www.xkcd.[TLD] should by rights link to the main xkcd site, but no trademark claim has been made or likely will be made, so you should be fine with doing whatever you want to do with URL redirects '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 09:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LaTeX (Or MathML, TeX) support? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[1489:_Fundamental_Forces|In the most recent comic at the time of posting]], there was use of formulae, being:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;gravity&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = G m&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/d&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;static&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; q&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;q&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/d&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There are probably many more comics using formulae that cannot be rendered properly without the use of LaTeX or something. The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Displaying_a_formula help page on Wikipedia] says that the following should work:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{gravity}=G\frac{m_1m_2}{d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{static}=K_e\frac{q_1q_2}{d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Provided that one has to set &amp;lt;source lang=&amp;quot;php&amp;quot; enclose=&amp;quot;none&amp;quot;&amp;gt;$wgUseTeX = true;&amp;lt;/source&amp;gt; in [[mw:Manual:LocalSettings.php|LocalSettings.php]]. Is there any reason for this to be disabled? If there is, is there any alternative?  —[[Special:Contributions/141.101.106.95|141.101.106.95]] 21:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The wgUseTeX flag was deprecated in mediawiki 1.18 in a move to simplify base mediawiki and move niche features into seperate plugins. I vaguely remember this being requested in the past, can't find any evidence of me implementing it. I'll try it now, see what stopped me last time. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ah, there's a bit of configuration work to it and I was busy at the time probably. I'll put it on the growing to do list on my userpage. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merge Cueball &amp;amp; Rob ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the risk of posting this idea too many places and annoying everyone, I would like to propose that we consider merging [[Cueball]] and [[Rob]] and redirecting Cueball to Rob, much as [[Cutie]] now redirects to [[Megan]]. The most common name given for a Cueball-like character in the strip is &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;. Like Megan, he is not always named. Also, like Megan, Rob tends to have distinct characteristics such as being a nerdy alter-ego to Randall (e.g. [[1168: tar]]) just as Megan often is the appearance given to comic representations of Randall's wife (see [[1141: Two Years]], before hair loss). Megan and Cueball appear to have a relationship (e.g. [[159: Boombox]]) and Megan clearly hangs out with Rob in ways not inconsistent with adventurous couples (e.g. [[782: Desecration]]). Finally, comics that feature both [[Black Hat]] and &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; seem to depict them as friends and possibly roommates. However, we learn in [[1102: Fastest-Growing]] that Black Hat's roommate is named &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, I believe if [[159: Boombox]] had called &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; we would've rewritten both Cutie and Cueball to redirect there.  Because we learned that &amp;quot;Cueball's&amp;quot; name is actually Rob much later (I think the earliest occurrences are [[647: Scary]], and [[716: Time Machine]]; the first time he is seen with Megan in a capacity that might indicate a relationship is [[782: Desecration]]). [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 19:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As I answered your comment on [[1496: Art Project]] Rob is [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Comics_featuring_Rob  already listed] as part of the category for Comics featuring Cueball: and this is listed as the first entry when going to the page for [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Comics_featuring_Cueball Category:Comics featuring Cueball]. Cueball is such an integral part of explain xkcd that I do not think any other users wish to change. Also the 9 incidences with Rob is maybe a specific person and at the time Randall did not think to give him any features. Also Cueballs have no specific behavior as you allude to. Neither has Megan. You can always find several Cueballs and Megans that behave a certain way. But then you can find many other comics where they behave the opposite way. Thus Rob and Cueball should not be merged. Also there are several comics with more than one Cueball. And here we have this problem: It is typically the first who writes the transcript who decides who of the Cueballs (or Megans) he feels represents the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; Cueball. However, there is no real behavior of Cueball. So who should decide. I could change all these transcripts so it becomes the other character who becomes Cueball, because I think that the first transcriber did it wrong. And this is why in a comic with more than one Cueball (where neither is called Rob or the like) neither of the two should be called Cueball. It would still be in the category with Cueball, because that is just comics with a Cueball like character no matter how many. But they cannot be named Cueball and friend or Rob and friend (unless Rob's name is mentioned!) They could be called Cueball 1 and Cueball 2, but then guy or man would be better. I know several places have comics with two Cueballs where someone has designated one of them Cueball and the other friend of foe etc. But this should be corrected so none of these are called Cueball. Same should go for more than one Megan. But this is very rare, and I have only found one other than ''Art project'' and here only one Megan had any lines. The problem with different opinions on which Cueball is which came for the first time up with Megan in ''Art project'': The two Megan-like characters was first named (left to right) Megan and Danish. Then unidentified girl and Megan. Then Megan and unidentified girl, then two Megan like girls with short and long hair and finally you reverted it to my first change away from Danish to unidentified girl and Megan. (I can live with that as there is difference in hair length and behavior). But as far as I see it Cueball is not Rob as well as Megan should have continued to be called Cutie (but I would not like to change that now, as I have grown fond of Megan). But at the time the change was done I believe it was wrong. The same fondness for the name Cueball also makes me sure that no one else would wish to call him Rob, even if that is as much his name as Megan is Cuties... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My argument is that it is inertia and sentiment (&amp;quot;fond of Megan&amp;quot;) that prevents an objective, equal treatment here. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 22:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, regarding the analogy made above to Danish.  I am fine with a nickname when Randall hasn't named a character.  So she was &amp;quot;unidentified girl&amp;quot; and then became &amp;quot;Danish&amp;quot;.  But, when we named her &amp;quot;Danish&amp;quot;, we went back to &amp;quot;Journal 1&amp;quot; and other places and renamed her.  My proposal is that we should go back through and rename &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;.  Alternatively, we should reinstate &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; for cases in which it is not clear that a character is &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; per se, but just Megan in her &amp;quot;everywoman&amp;quot; capacity. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 00:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure how to post a poll, but I see the following options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Status quo: Cueball for all unidentified males without distinct characteristics (e.g. hats), Megan for all shoulder-length brunettes.  Rob only for named Cueballs.  Multiple Cueballs in a comic mean one is named Cueball and others get named &amp;quot;Friend&amp;quot;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Symmetry 1: Cueball/Rob stays as is.  Unnamed brunettes get named &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; is reserved for comics in which a name is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Symmetry 2: Megan stays as is.  Rob is the default for indistinct males.  &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; page redirects to &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; (as &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; now redirect to &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Expunge all Cueballs from multi-Cueball comics: Basically the status quo, except that in comics with multiple Cueballs none are named &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; and are just all given names &amp;quot;Man 1&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Man 2&amp;quot;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am ambivalent regarding options 2 or 3.  I could live with 1 if there is consensus for it, but I don't like it.  4 is a disaster in my mind and gains nothing. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 22:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are probably the only one who reads these post...? But anyway as is clear I'm for 4. Which has been used several places already.´I can live with 1. I think 2 and 3 are disasters. Also it would be completely confusing for those who have used this page for many years. Why do you bring this up now? Is it because of the multiple Megan comics, or have you just signed up here, and dislike that it doesn't follow the rules you would have expected?--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
::I suggest instead that we create a category for multiple Cueballs, so it is easy to explain why the Cueball is not a specific character, and thus can never be Rob (except when it is clear from the text), or be expected to behave a certain way. And in reverse we make a Named Megan category so it is easy to find the few (three?) where she has been named. This by the way has nothing to do with the other suggestions, so I might just do that to get an overview. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: It seems more consistent to me to use [[Cutie]] for all unnamed &amp;quot;Megans&amp;quot; and reserve &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; for named comics. Thus, Rob is '''a''' Cueball and Megan is '''a''' Cutie. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 13:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've read through some of your discussions (Here, Kynde's talk page, Art Project discussion), and thought I might put my thoughts forwards. Essentially we have three questions here:&lt;br /&gt;
::::1) Should we merge Cueball and Rob, and rename all Cueballs as Rob?&lt;br /&gt;
::::2) Should we rename all Megans as Cutie, except where she is explicitly named?&lt;br /&gt;
::::3) Once questions 1 &amp;amp; 2 are answered, what do we do where the 'same' character appears multiple times in one comic?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I understand the objective argument for renaming Cueball to Rob, however I'm unconvinced of the importance of being entirely objective, and I can't imagine Cueball being renamed to anything other than Cueball. &lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think its fairly clear where the Cueball label has come from, even if it might not be immediately obvious to some. Even if readers don't make the link between Cueball's head and a cue-ball, it is quite a generic label, which I think fits well with the transient every-man nature of Cueball's usage.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*There is something far more specific about the name Rob, which suggests that he is the same character every time. The origin of the name isn't obvious, which I think would be likely to cause confusion. &lt;br /&gt;
::::This brings me to conclude that for me, the answer to Q1 has to be that Cueball should stay as Cueball, unless explicitly named something else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The question of changing Megan to Cutie is one where I am less confident. Following the arguments I've made above, the outcome has to be that we rename to Cutie unless specifically named Megan, however I am not entirely convinced. The name Megan has a history, there are surely lots of people who now know her as Megan, what do we really stand to gain from all the work of changing to Cutie? I would also suggest that the name Cutie may not be accepted well by those with strong feminist views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::As far as multi-character comics, I don't have time right now, but I will come back later and add my thoughts. Now that we've only got a few incomplete comics, we've had to resort to discussing renaming characters!--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I agree with the reasons for keeping Cueball and Megan. And also that Cutie is such a loaded word, that it should never have been used anyway. This I did not immediately think about, but Cutie sounds like something from either a porn movie, or else a Bond Babe... Like the phrase from one of those movies: &amp;quot;Hello, I'm Plenty...&amp;quot; Then we should have to find a third name. And everyone here knows her as Megan. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I have created the [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Category:Multiple_Cueballs Category:Multiple Cueballs] to locate them and to show how often there are more than one. Feel free to add any I haven't found yet. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Rob is Black Hat's roommate and Megan's boyfriend/partner/husband (see above).  The &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; in comics such as [[159: Boombox]] and [[542: Cover-Up]] should, in my view, be renamed &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;, even though he is not explicitly called that in those comics.  Most other &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot; comics can stay unchanged. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 00:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have left my reason to disagree also with this on the two comics talk page. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, it is quite clear that [[Randall]] has chosen to name the main male protagonist [[Rob]], for the few occasions where he needs characters to call upon each other, in the same way as he has chosen [[Megan]] for the main female protagonist. We should therefore try to overcome our nostalgia, follow Randall, and call the common male protagonist Rob. The problem with multiple cueballs can most often be resolved by identifying the protagonist, from the first-person narration or the general perspective. Thus, in [[525: I Know You're Listening]] Rob is the comic's &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;, to the left. In [[1110: Click and Drag]], Rob is obviously flying with a balloon. In [[610: Sheeple]] Rob is arguably the guy in the foreground facing us. Non-Rob &amp;quot;cueballs&amp;quot; we could refer to as &amp;quot;friend&amp;quot; &amp;quot;man&amp;quot;, etc. In this way roughly half of the &amp;quot;multiple cueballs&amp;quot; would be resolved. I think I can live with a few unclear cases, like [[220: Philosophy]]. [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A featureless character has been ''specifically'' named Rob in 9 comics, compared with 968 'Comics featuring Cueball'. I believe it is fundamentally flawed to assert that because a featureless character is named Rob in less than 1% of appearances, that all featureless characters should therefore be assumed to be Rob. As I've discussed above, I think that Rob strongly implies a specific person, whereas Cueball is a vague 'everyman' character. I feel it would be a huge error to change all Cueballs to Robs.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 17:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The problem with that logic is that &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; is only named in a small number of comics (fewer that &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot;).  So we should have a different name for an unnamed generic female.  [[Cutie]] is fine, but if people perceive that as sexist, then another name, maybe &amp;quot;Cuegirl&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Brunette&amp;quot; would work.  (Side note: I doubt &amp;quot;Cutie&amp;quot; would be perceived as sexist and there's history there.)  What I '''do''' find sexist is the fact that there is asymmetry between male and female &amp;quot;everyperson&amp;quot;s.  In sum, I would say there is at less evidence to support naming Megan-everywoman &amp;quot;Megan&amp;quot; in all cases as there is to name Rob-everyman (here called &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;) &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; in all cases.  Asymmetry here ignores the fact that Randall clearly intends his name to be &amp;quot;Rob&amp;quot; and also that we are using a proper name for everywoman but a contrived name for everyman, while creating an artificial distinction between Rob and Cueball and smearing out any possible distinction between Megan-everywoman and Megan-properName. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 13:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I put in my earlier comment (see above), I do agree that the logical conclusion is that Megan should no longer be named Megan, and should have an equivalent generic name. As an aside, I'm quite partial to your suggestion of Cuegirl. I disagree with your assertion that &amp;quot;Randall clearly intends his name to be Rob&amp;quot;, and I think that is the central point of this discussion. I don't believe that there is anywhere near enough evidence to assign a specific name to what I believe is a generic character. If we want to go for formal logic, consider the syllogism &amp;quot;Some non descipt characters are called Rob, there are many non-descript characters, therfore all non-descript characters are called Rob&amp;quot;. The conclusion simply does not follow. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Great, I vote for Cuegirl &amp;amp; Cueball :: Megan &amp;amp; Rob!  [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 01:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Djbrasier's and St.nerol's arguments, and I too feel that the arguments against dealing with this in an objective, symmetrical and logical way seem mostly based on nostalgia. Either we agree that a few named instances of the everywoman are sufficient to generalize to the (vastly more numerous) unnamed instances, and apply the same standard to the everyman, which is only consistent (and even more justified in the case of Rob since he is named in more comics than Megan), or we decide that the extrapolation is unjustified and we revert the Cutie--&amp;gt;Megan merge. The alternative --having double standards and deciding things based on historical baggage and emotional attachment rather than rationality-- makes no sense for followers of the comic that ''literally invented'' nerd-sniping!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd also add that, as a non-native speaker, &amp;quot;cueball&amp;quot; doesn't ring any immediate bells unless the connection to cue balls is pointed out explicitly -- so actually Rob works even better as a generic name than Cueball. We have already [[#New character|agreed previously]] that clarity is better than cleverness when we named [[Hairy]], forgoing the less obvious alliteration &amp;quot;Harry&amp;quot;, so I vote we use the name Randall ''actually'' gave us, let go of our attachments to a creation he never endorsed, and honor our collective nerdiness by doing the logical thing: apply our standards uniformly and adopt Rob the same way we adopted Megan. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 06:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've already put my thoughts forward above, so I won't repeat the same ground I've covered, other than to say I believe it would be a mistake to turn all Cueballs into Robs. While I will admit to having some nostalgia for the name Cueball, that isn't a major facet of my argument. I believe that any generic name is better than a specific name. Call them Stickboy &amp;amp; Stickgirl if you want! I know there are a fairly significant number of contributors and visitors who do not have English as their first language, but I don't believe that is a reason to choose a specific name, rather than a generic name, even if the origin of the latter isn't immediately obvious to all. It would be interesting to know whether each of us sees Cueball as always being the same person, or Cueball *is* Randall, or Cueball is just a changeable everyman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To me, he is a changeable everyman, who I guess may represent or be based on: Randall, his friends, family or acquaintances, famous people, someone he saw in the street, or a completely made up character used to fill a specific role in the comic. The reason I argue againt merging Rob &amp;amp; Cueball is that the Cueball I see is this morphing and fluid character, and to use a specific name to tie him down to being the same character all the time runs completely counter to that. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 08:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Understood, and sorry for mischaracterizing your argument (the nostalgia part does butt the discussion though). I suppose I would be somewhat ambivalent to either have Rob+Megan, or Cueball+Cutie -- Cuegirl doesn't work because she has hair :) --, in the interests of reason and symmetry. But I lean slightly towards Rob+Megan because those are names Randall actually gave us, while anything else is our own invention and thus has no claim to legitimacy other than popular support.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Particularly, while I understand your concern about shoehorning the various personality traits the Cueballs show in different comics into a single persona, that doesn't seem to have been a problem for Megan -- not to mention real people ''are'' indeed complex and multi-faceted beings (or &amp;quot;morphing and fluid&amp;quot;, to use your terms) rather than one-dimensional caricatures. Heck, even Black Hat has his romantic side! :) So in light of that, I don't think we have to worry about ruining Cueball by naming him Rob -- if anything, that'd add more depth to him as a character! --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 16:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm still very much against changing things here. Call it nostalgia, but there are many users who will never read these arguments, who one day comes back and cannot find Megan or Cueball, and will ask who the heck are Cuegirl/Cutie. I'm completely with Pudder on the problem with giving Cueball the name Rob. It just doesn't make sense. I agree that we have a inconsistency with Megan. But then everyone who uses this page a few times, becomes familiar with that name. However the main problem with all your great ideas is this. Who should correct the either 984 pages where Cueball is mentioned because he is a part of it (and all the other pages relevant to him or where he is exactly mentioned because he isn't part of the comic) and/or who should do the same for 487 comics (plus loose pages) for Megan. Unless those in favor for changing the names will do this, then the discussion is moot. It is already clearly stated in the relevant pages that these two characters are generic and that they have been named but a few times. So what more can we do unless someone is willing to use several days to change this back. I sincerely doubt you can keep the correct syntax if you just try a brute force replacement? There are so many interconnecting links etc. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I completely disagree with merging Cueball and Rob. Rob has [[276|Emily]] and [[632|Lisa]] as girlfriends, and Cueball has Megan. Rob also lives a more action-filled and stereotypical life compared to Cueball. --[[User:Youforgotthisthing|Youforgotthisthing]] ([[User talk:Youforgotthisthing|talk]]) 13:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the main stances here are clear:&lt;br /&gt;
* Keep as is&lt;br /&gt;
* Rename Cuball to Rob&lt;br /&gt;
* Change Megan back to Cutie/Cuegirl&lt;br /&gt;
Since keeping it status quo wouldn't change anything and is asymmetrical, I'll go over the others:&lt;br /&gt;
* Rename Cueball to Rob - Arguments:&lt;br /&gt;
** Randall gave him this name;&lt;br /&gt;
** It would offer symmetry to Megan;&lt;br /&gt;
** If the Cutie -&amp;gt; Megan logic is to be followed (as she was changed once named in the comics) then Cueball should be Rob;&lt;br /&gt;
** Even though cueball is a generic everyman name, Rob seems more like a name you could give anyone and would be more recognizable to non-native English speakers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Change Megan back to Cutie/Cuegirl - Arguments:&lt;br /&gt;
** It would cause symmetry again, letting her have an everywoman name;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nostalgia for Cueball;&lt;br /&gt;
** Megan is not always the same character, so she should not always have the name Megan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I happen to agree with the idea of merging Cueball and Rob, but I'm not closed to the idea of Cutie/Cuegirl. The main problem is that these characters are typically interchangeable everymen/everywomen and there can be more than one in a comic. So another question is what we should do for multiple Cueballs/Robs. In my opinion, we should have all the comics with more than one depict them as Man 1, Man 2, etc. --[[User:Sensorfire|Sensorfire]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire|talk]]) 17:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I disagree. The users are used to refeer to these characters now by these names. It is also impractical to try to change them all. Megan is rarely twice in a comic. Maybe she is more the same like Black Hat is. But it is made clear that they are not the same in every comic in their pages. If there are muliple Cueballs but one is the main protagonist then he us cueball. If none can be singled out then Cueball like guy to the left/right can be used. I have done that for tbose cases I have found so far ([[:Category:Multiple_Cueballs|49 today]]).--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to fit explanations of new classes of xkcd-related mysteries into the site: what-if, t-shirts, posters, special comics etc. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest that the [http://explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:About explain xkcd] page should explain how this site is laid out, and what sorts of things are explained here besides the online numbered xkcd comics that come out three times a week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, there is the [[A Smarter Planet]] series, and there are ideas for explaining some of the [http://what-if.xkcd.com/ What-If] series.  I'd like to add my explanation of the [https://gist.github.com/nealmcb/398af29a72f7b3efc202 XKCD Greek t-shirt, with mathematical, scientific and engineering uses for greek letters] and perhaps some other t-shirts, posters and the like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I can't even figure out how to find non-numbered-comic-explanations, without going thru the entire [[Special:AllPages]] listing, which includes a huge set of unnumbered aliases as well as the numbered ones.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've taken a stab towards that by editing the About page to point to some categories (and to start with a little overview), but since I'm just poking around, I might have missed some things.  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 19:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on main page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there should be a link to [[Special:SpecialPages]] on the main-page--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 11:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Special pages is a default feature in every mediawiki installation. It's also in the sidebar of every page, and it's not relevant to xkcd. Why does it merit space on the main page? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 18:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Science comic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the Science Magazine comic be added? http://m.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/58.full [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 03:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that would be a great idea. Could there be other copyright rules when the comic has been published on Science? It there anyway to find out if Randall also has a link to it from (or has it on) xkcd? As he has done with the other [[:Category:Extra_Comics|Extra_Comics]]. And how do we create such a page, if there can be no link directly to xkcd (at the top of the comic)? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:24, 30 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;what if?&amp;quot; section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to start a new &amp;quot;what if?&amp;quot; section explaining and discussing what if pages.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 06:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does it need to exist? The main xkcd comic needs it, because Randall tends to be obtuse at times, but the what if articles are sourced and written out already. Supposedly, they're already explanations to questions sent in to Randall. Why do we need to explain explanations? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Explaining them indeed seems unnecessary, but we could certainly catalog and summarize them. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 16:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The images on what if? also have title texts that could further be explained, and we could organize what if pages by categories, as well as provide summaries. There are also subtle references, running gags, and in-jokes in What If? that should be explained.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:44, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This https://what-if.xkcd.com/120/ is a example of a what if that could do with some explanations.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 08:47, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's one of 135 what-ifs, and it's entirely self referential and can be figured out by reading the rest of the archive. The substance of the majority of pages is going to be incredibly thin, Randall doesn't tend to leave much for explanation. Comics that are simple one-shot images are our least used pages for good reason, and the what-if images pretty much all fall into that category, or are used to illustrate Randall's point that he makes in the immediately preceding paragraph. We could archive/catalog all the what-if pages and be a second archive button for the series, though there's a little less value to that than the archiving we did for [[Time]] and [[Externalities]] because there's already an archive along the same lines on the main site. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 19:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think the main value we could add is a summary (TL;DR style) of each entry, in a short Q&amp;amp;A format. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 12:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
If we are going forward with this, is there anyway to find the date in which the what if was first published?--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 09:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:At the bottom of the page, there's an archive button. Click that. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 19:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Well, fact is,  the [[what if?]] page is much, '''much''' larger now. [[User:Nk22|Nk22]] ([[User talk:Nk22|talk]]) 11:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Nk22!  I've added a link from the [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd About explain xkcd] page. {{unsigned|Nealmcb}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Userscript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello there, just wrote a simple userscript that adds an 'Explain' button to the original xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://gist.github.com/magazov/934de662d60c9fb5fea9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can run it via Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and other similar plugins :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Screen_Shot_xkcd_button.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{unsigned|Magazovski}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, there's a few of these floating around. In the future, could you use an imgur link instead of uploading stuff like that to the wiki? Thanks. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 18:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So maybe explainxkcd should host &amp;amp; maintain one of them? --[[User:Magazovski|Magazovski]] ([[User talk:Magazovski|talk]]) 09:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why would we host an image hosting site? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::He means we could host and maintain a userscript to help our fans get here from xkcd....  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 14:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hum, that's not a bad idea. I'll put it on the list of things to do. Although, if they're already here, why do they need a userscript to help them get here? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 00:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::For people who mainly view the comics through the official site, but sometimes need an explanation of the comic. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 09:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Updating the incomplete comic of the day ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, I think the incomplete comic of the day should be changed more often (i.e. daily), since the incomplete comics are piling up, and most users aren't seeing the notice, as it is dismissible.--[[User:17jiangz1|17jiangz1]] ([[User talk:17jiangz1|talk]]) 11:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree that the comic of the day could be changed more often, I wouldn't say that the incomplete comics are ''piling up''. Over the months I've been active here, the number of incomplete comics had fallen considerably. In fact if you check the comics which are still marked as incomplete, most of them are one where a significant effort would be required to complete them. For example the large comics (Money, Time, Congress) or dynamic comics (Externalities, Click &amp;amp; Drag, Pixels). --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 15:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah. Of the 15 incomplete &amp;quot;pages,&amp;quot; only 10 of them are actual comics that need the attention, and the full count is still dropping. I've been keeping it on single comics as of late because the remaining actual incomplete comics have been cycled through ~3 times already, with no significant effort made on them, because they're such monumental pieces of work. Making the message dismissable is by design, we are a service first and foremost, we're not trying that hard to make visitors do our work for us. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 23:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infrequently recurring minor charachters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we just group all of the characters that are not of enough significance to warrant their own character page into a single page (i.e. [[Other Minor Characters]])?  --{{User:17jiangz1/signature|02:58, 09 May 2015}}&lt;br /&gt;
:See comic [[1000]] for a sample of what this entails. Also, what value to we stand to provide by cataloging every unique character that has appeared in xkcd? Does it help us explain the comics any better? '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comic page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is comic page creation not automated? If it isn't, then [[Help talk:How to add a new comic explanation]] should be created.--{{User:17jiangz1/signature|14:19, 26 May 2015}} 14:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Comic explanation was, at one point, automated. However, the bot ran on a schedule, and so sometimes there would be a few hours between a new comic being posted and the page getting created. Some editors just can't wait that long, so they do the bot's work before the bot even gets going. I agree that this page should be created and be kept up to date. Historically no one has read any of the help pages I've written. ;p [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 17:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:However, I think that the page should be [[Help:Comic Explanation Page Creation]]. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I'm an admin. I can help.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;_a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 17:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re-proposing merging Cueball and Rob ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, so this was previously [[http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob discussed] but I felt that it was worth bringing up again. Really, at this point, there's no logical reason why the two should not be merged, or Megan and Cutie should be un-merged. Rob and Cueball clearly seem to be the same person, at least when cueball appears as a specific character. In the instances where there are multiple Cueballs, we should just refer to them as Man 1, Man 2, and so on. Can we get a vote or something this time? Yes, I understand that Cueball isn't always the same character. But neither is [[Megan]], and yet we always refer to the short black haired girl (formerly [[Cutie]]) as Megan. If that logic applies to her, it applies to Rob. It's pretty clear that Randall intended to name the character Rob, as most named Cueballs are named Rob and not Fred or something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short: Please don't bring nostalgia into this, it's really not relevant. Changing Cueball to Rob or Megan back to Cutie (or Cuegirl?) would have symmetry and make sense. {{unsigned ip|Sensorfire}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm ok with dumping a marginal character page that only served to add confusion to character identification in new comics, but this was a subject of contention before so we probably need to see more of people's thoughts first. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree: let's list the arguments for both sides, ensure that everyone agrees with the objectiveness of that listing, and then vote. If there's support for this plan, and nobody does it first, I'll take a stab at producing a first draft of the summary. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 23:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall is currently on a booktour. So, how about, instead of us (without the ability to read minds) arguing about his intention or who is/isn't the same character, someone go see him and ask? Then we'll know with absolute 100% certainty. [[User:WaltG123|WaltG123]] ([[User talk:WaltG123|talk]]) 04:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Randall never called either character Cueball and Cutie so of course this is not his names. Asking him would make no meaning at all. For any user of xkcd it will create lots of confusion to change the names of Megan and Cueball now. Regarding Rob he is already listed as Cueball in his category. And Cueballs have been called other names several times. Rob is just the only one that has been used a few times. I agree that it may have been wrong to call her Megan, (the name has been used like three times?) Similar it is just as wrong to call Black Hat's girlfriend [[Danish]], a nick name used once. But it is actually very nice to have a real name or at least useful name when speaking of characters. And it has also been mentioned that Cutie could be perused as a sexist name, so we should not move back to that. Well recently even [[Hairbun]] has her name changed from Hairbun girl since a user thought that was a problem given it most often was a grown woman.  So I think we should stick to the solution of the previous debate and leave Cueball, Rob and Megan alone as they are! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adjective phrases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overwhelmed with the need to be picayune, I am compelled to point out that on the homepage there is the sentence that begins &amp;quot;There are a lot of comics that don't have set in stone explanations...&amp;quot; This sentence contains a adjective phrase which should be hyphenated thus: &amp;quot;set-in-stone&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please pretend that I have said something witty here, as I am too tired to think of anything funny. {{unsigned|Gamewriter}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Is it actually grammatically wrong in it's current state? Huh. I guess I'll change it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 20:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is long after the fact, but I'll throw my two cents in on Davidy22's question. Yes, it is wrong. If the 'set in stone' phrase were after the word explanations (&amp;quot;explanations set in stone&amp;quot;) it would not require hyphens, but used as an adjective before the noun (&amp;quot;set-in-stone explanations&amp;quot;) it requires them. D Miller [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.41|108.162.221.41]] 18:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are currently using MediaWiki 1.19.17. It's ''really'' outdated. Maybe update to 1.26.2, the current recommended stable version? There is an [[mw:Manual:Upgrading|official guide]] for that. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.77|141.101.80.77]] 12:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC) (PS my IP address is wrong it's not what you think it is)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rename Hair Bun Girl ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character [[Hair Bun Girl]] was named in April 2015. There wasn't any discussion of the name at the time, so I'd like to open that discussion now please.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present we have several other characters named after distinctive visual features: [[Ponytail]], [[Black Hat]], [[White Hat]], [[Beret Guy]], and arguably [[Hairy]] and [[Cueball]]. In all but one of those cases, the name matches the distinctive feature itself, without the addition of &amp;quot;guy&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot;, etc. Given the number of comics that Beret Guy is in it's probably too late to modify his name, but it's not too late for Hair Bun Girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the consistency issue, there's also the inaccuracy of referring to a grown woman with the term &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot;, particularly when the character has been presented as older than [[Megan]]. I'd really like to fix this while her number of appearances is still manageable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name &amp;quot;Hairbun&amp;quot; has been proposed and I think that matches really nicely with Ponytail in particular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 04:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the &amp;quot;guy&amp;quot; who created the Hair Bun Girl characther, I have no objection to changing the name. I did not think about the issue with girl/woman, probably because I'm not native English speaker. (And with the Beret Guy as an example). Jkshapiro was so kind as to [[User_talk:Kynde#Hair_Bun_.22Girl.22|ask my opinion]] before starting this discussion. At first I thought that ''Hairbun'' was a little weird, but then again so is Ponytail in this context. So I '''support''' the change to '''Hairbun'''! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I vote '''change''' Hair Bun to Hairbun and '''keep''' girl. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 21:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, I'm going ahead. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 02:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well as I said I would not mind, but you cannot say you got any other to agree with you on this though. Mimek wished to keep girl... It will be a huge job to get all the instances correct, also be careful no to change those places where the talk is of a girl who has a hair bun. You cannot just change all placed with hair bun girl to Hairbun, in case is actually says the hair bun girl about a small girl who has a hair bun!  --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Seems no one cares, so I will remove the notes now. Great job Jkshapiro with changing the names. I like the new name now :-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 22:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mobile friendly website ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we get a mobile friendly version of the wiki?  If we already have one, what about forwarding the main site to it when viewed on a phone? [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 20:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there may be a need to propose a standard way to decide on categories: what new ones are needed, what are the prerequisites for creating a new category, how to maintain new categories and make sure they are actually used when they apply etc. For now I have gathered all previous discussions about new categories under this section. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 13:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that whenever there are more than 4-5 comics that you wish to refer to in a given explanation because they are of the same topic as the current comic, then having a category is much to prefer rather than listing 5, 6 or 7 comics. I have made several categories for these instances, for instance for sport including the most used sports. At the time being I keep them up to date. One of the things this site does so well is giving you an easy way to find a specific comic even though you cannot remember the title of any precise quotes etc. If you just have an idea of what the topic was you might find it based on the categories. In this way I do not think we can have too many categories. As long as they describe a recurring subject. Only fault is that there seems to be no way to search for a comic based on more than one category? That would be great. In some cases even only 3 comics in a category can make sense. For instance I would be sorry to see this one go [[:Category:Puts on sunglasses]] (and I did not make it!) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::For instance I have long wished for categories that covered all the space probe related comics, particularly all those referencing the Mars rovers. So today I made them with 16 and 9 comics in them already. [[:Category:Space probes]] [[:Category:Mars rovers]]. I hope people will generally think this was a great idea! :-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And [[:Category:The Lion King]]... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Protip ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone for adding ''Protip'' as a [[:Category:Comic series|Comic series]]. I have found five so far: [[653]], [[711]], [[1022]], [[1047]] and [[1156]]. (There are also a few comics with a protip title text.) -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that qualifies as a recurring topic (thus worthy of a category), but not as a series, where you can see a clear sequence. In fact, [[:Category:My Hobby|My Hobby]] has the same limitation, for what I suggest it to be removed from [[:Category:Comic series]]. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 11:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Seconded. Looks general and common enough to be a category. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;span title=&amp;quot;I want you.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;2px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Okay, great! Do you think that the ones with a &amp;quot;protip:&amp;quot; title text should be included? Besides, I think I might be the one responsiple for moving My Hobby from [[:Category:Comics by topic|Comics by topic]] to Comic series. I felt that all the My Hobby comics were about different topics, but maybe i've got to narrow an interpretation of the word &amp;quot;topic&amp;quot;. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 15:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Can you link to the protip-in-title-text comics?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: As for My Hobby, note that categories aren't mutually exclusive. They can be in the &amp;quot;my hobby&amp;quot; topic, and each of them further categorized as appropriate: music, math, etc. Makes sense? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 03:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I just searched for protip in the xkcd search bar. Here: [[1084]], [[427]]. And yes, makes sense. I've moved My Hobby back to &amp;quot;by topic&amp;quot;. -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Sports ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about creating a new &amp;quot;Sports&amp;quot; category?  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 15:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, maybe. Everyone aren't so keen on new categories here. Which comics are you thinking of, for a start? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 20:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We definitely need to reach an agreement as a community on when to create new categories. Something simple like a minimum of 3 (or, say, 5) existing comics. Since we're already at the proposals' portal... what do you guys think about that? --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 21:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My opinion:  Five would be enough to qualify.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 09:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I vote for four. But it should also be a reasonable thing to categorize, like sports, not like &amp;quot;sports with Cueball containing at least three anagram words&amp;quot;. Wich sholdn't be a problem. :) But the best name choice could be tricky sometimes. e.g. &amp;quot;Film &amp;amp; television&amp;quot;, Film &amp;amp; TV&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Film&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Films&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;Movies&amp;quot;? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed, five should be enough to create the category without having to discuss it. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, let's start with [[588: Pep Rally|588]], [[1092: Michael Phelps|1092]], [[904: Sports|904]] and [[1107: Sports Cheat Sheet|1107]].  Should be able to find a few more.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 05:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeah, it's a broad subject so there are probably several more.  -[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 12:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I found another one, sort of, in [[929:Speculation|929]] (although it hasn't been explained yet).  Should I get the ball rolling (no pun intended) on setting up the category?  Don't wanna do it unilaterally and get yelled at.  ;)  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 06:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you should. On a wiki, getting stuck in discussions which die without a conclusion, to the point that motivated people give up without having done anything, is definitely counter-productive, and phrases like [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Be bold|Wikipedia:Be bold]] are here to remind us of that. Seems like people agreed that you ''could'', and after a while nobody said that you ''shouldn't'', so I'd say do it. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I did it without looking here first, because it was obvious there were many [[:Category:Sport|sport comics]]. I have even created four under categories (only one was there before, Chess). There are 10 comics at present that are related to other sports than the five under categories. And given the way Randall thinks about sport (not very much) he still has plenty of comics about the subject. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 07:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Sex ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should also create a Sex category.  There's no ''doubt'' we can find more than three examples.  I'll start looking for them and post the ones I find in here; again, I don't wanna create a large category by myself without community consent.  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 09:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
*OK, the ones for Category: Sex that I've found so far are [[443]], [[219]], [[550]], [[1026]], [[575]], [[468]], [[592]], [[320]], [[1101]], [[417]], [[713]], [[672]], [[230]], [[436]], [[940]], [[532]], [[649]], [[176]], [[1006]], [[596]] and [[717]], and I'm sure there are many more.  Should we create this category?  [[User:Ekedolphin|Ekedolphin]] ([[User talk:Ekedolphin|talk]]) 23:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as [[#Category: Sports|above]], do it. Oh, already did; well, all the better. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 00:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Flowcharts ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, the line &amp;quot;Randall has made use of flowcharts before.&amp;quot; in today's comic explanation made me want a [[:Category:Flowcharts|flowcharts category]] to navigate into...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it didn't exist, I proceeded to create it, but as the log says, [[User:lcarsos|lcarsos]] deleted such a category in November, saying ''&amp;quot;Insufficient differentiation from Category:Comics with charts, diluting the depth of comics tagged charts&amp;quot;''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't agree with that, and I think we could profit from such a subcategory. I found those pages fitting it:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[94: Profile Creation Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[210: 90's Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[488: Steal This Comic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[627: Tech Support Cheat Sheet]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[844: Good Code]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[851: Na]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[854: Learning to Cook]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1195: Flowchart]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So? - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 10:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Weell if you're willing to take charge of the category and personally make sure it's added to all relevant comic explanations, go ahead. The usual objection to making new categories is that we admins can't remember all the categories when we're reviewing new explanations, but it's K if you're willing to take up that responsibility yourself. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 11:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:: OK. I did it without waiting for further replies, because I think it will be especially profitable today (to viewers).&lt;br /&gt;
:: It doesn't seem a big issue to me if the correct category is not added when a new explanation is made: a passing editor will do it later on... But hey, I'm OK with taking special care of adding pages to this category.&lt;br /&gt;
:: [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 12:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I just want to add that Cos' view is indeed the appropriate way to work in wikis: there is no concept of a single author for a page, category, or piece of text, and the workload is meant to be distributed among several editors: it is not necessary that any single editor remembers all existing categories, or knows the wiki markup by heart, or knows how to work with all the features of mediawiki, etc. The reason why wikis can be edited by anyone is precisely a recognition that there *will* be errors and any page can be improved somehow. That reasoning against categories should, IMO, be abandoned, or at most only kept as the opinion of some editors. --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 22:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isnt there a page which lists all the categories? If not, there should be one, and it should be accessible to all. Such a page could be useful when trying to quick-add categories to comics. [[Special:Contributions/117.194.83.155|117.194.83.155]] 13:43, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, there is. [[Special:Categories]]. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 14:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Of course, there's a gazillion of 'em, over several pages, so I understand any reluctance to add new categories (having just suggested a new one myself which I feel is justified, but knowing that the upkeep needed may be the key point of contention so remaining philosophical about it).&lt;br /&gt;
::A solution perhaps to carry over from another locale that I frequent is to have a &amp;quot;Categories of Character&amp;quot; page, a &amp;quot;Categories of Object&amp;quot; one, perhaps &amp;quot;Categories of Event&amp;quot;, and a &amp;quot;Categories of Publication&amp;quot;.  For each new comic someone can easily check the shorter Character categories list against those present, the Object list against itemsin use, Events, etc, and of course the Publication one has the &amp;quot;Tuesday Comic&amp;quot;/equivalent, and other date-based ones (although isn't that automatic from templated creation?  ...never added a comic, but would imagine it is).  After that it's a trawl through the miscelania categories (perhaps a meta-category just for them?).  But, yeah, a lot of work to set up.  Wouldn't wish it on anyone who wasn't already willing to do it, and I remain an anon-IP person right now so can hardly commit ''myself'' as volunteer maintainer of this. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 17:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: (Barred/banned from?) Conferences ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I come here after realising I erroneously posted (in reply) to the Main page Talk, being anonymous (or at least IP-only) and without a list of qualifying articles to support me, just yet, but still wish to put forward the above category before I forget.  There's no apparent equivalent, that I found, but it's definitely a recurring meme.  I should be back (named or otherwise) with my suggested list of members, if someone else doesn't get there first, but I thought I'd start with the placemarker. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 16:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, so I got the bee in my bonnet and spent a few minutes actually looking into this.  Revising &amp;quot;Barred from Conferences&amp;quot; (actually more often &amp;quot;Banned&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;Thrown out of&amp;quot;/equivalent) to just &amp;quot;Conferences&amp;quot;, the subset of comics that I can easily find that are involved is *[[153]], *[[177]], *[[365]], *[[410]], *[[463]], *[[541]], [[545]], [[685]], [[829]] and [[867]], but I'm sure there are more recent ones that I didn't spot/recall.  One alternative title to &amp;quot;Conferences&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;Presentations&amp;quot;, and I'm sure if I'd searched for that I'd have found more potential candidates (less some that might ''exit'' the renamed category).  The asterisked ones ''do'' deal with being barred/banned/thrown out/etc, making it still a suitable category in its own right, IMO, but I'll leave it up to your combined musings to decide. [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 17:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I add [[690]] to the list. --[[User:Chtz|Chtz]] ([[User talk:Chtz|talk]]) 08:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Great suggestions! I created [[:Category:Public speaking]] and [[:Category:Banned from conferences]]. I also added [[Wikipedian Protester]] to the mix, of course :) --[[User:Waldir|Waldir]] ([[User talk:Waldir|talk]]) 21:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Wishes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://explainxkcd.com/1391/ Several] [http://explainxkcd.com/1086/ comics] [http://explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/152:_Hamster_Ball now] [http://xkcd.com/879/ exist] that talk about wishes - probably more. Should there be a category for this? [[User:Z|Z]] ([[User talk:Z|talk]]) 23:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Doesn't seem significant enough. If you promise to maintain the category you can make it yourself, although it will be cleared out if it gets neglected as new comics are released. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 15:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Artificial Intelligence ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a handful of comics involving Ai - [[1540]], [[1530]], [[1450]] and [[948]] for instance - and maybe it's an idea to give them their own category {{unsigned|Nk22}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The usual objection to new categories is that they get abandoned and are too narrow for other people to think of picking them up. If you're going to own it and update it with new comics, you can make it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 21:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Category: Size Comparisons ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are numerous comics comparing sizes of things.  I can't get a list right now, but off the top of my head, radiation dosages, money, today's comic, and space shuttles in horses. [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 19:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adding Ratings for Explanations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/1652 today's explanation] excellently written however that is not always the case.   Frequently explanations are walk through of the conversation that are too wordy without any succinct explanation of why or how a strip is funny -- while many of those low quality explanations are not strictly &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; they could benefit from a careful rewrite.   I was wondering if we should add a rating tool such as &amp;quot; ''Was this explanation helpful? yes/no'' &amp;quot; so as to identify explanation that could benefit from improvement without having to be tagged as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot;. [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 17:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We have a rather prominent discussion page for feedback, do we really need an additional add-on for this? I did a little research and found that other wikis use [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Rating semantic rating] and [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ArticleRatings article ratings], which I can install if enough other users want it. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 05:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Speculation Sections ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often see a lot of speculation and conjecture within the explanation of the comic itself. I don't think it has any place in the explanation but I know many editors enjoy speculating and interpreting the comic and the meaning behind it so I've decided to start this discussion on whether we should provide a section where we can provide different speculations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I am thinking would not be like the discussion page, where comments are made and discussed, but an edited and reviewed section which outlines different speculations and interpretations of the comics themselves and perhaps even the author's intent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course tone and presentation should be held to the same standards of the comic explanation but I think this would be a good way to better organize a review of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been away too long to remember if there are any comic explanations with something like this so I have no idea how well it would work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This part from comic 1642: [[Gravitational Waves]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot; It seems that Randall knew in advance about this announcement because this comic was published on a Thursday, not following the normal publish schedule, to coincide with the announcement &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is well supported, and rather likely correct, conjecture which belongs in the body of the explanation because not only is it backed by strong evidence but it provides background on the comic and the time in which the comic was released and aids in understanding the comic itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, this part from comic 478: [[The Staple Madness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;From just reading the comic by itself, one may presume that in the last panel, Cueball has been stapled to the ceiling (as obvious evidence to Megan that Beret Guy has indeed been abusing her staple gun). According to the comic's official transcript, however, it is in fact God who is speaking.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is almost as equally well supported and certainly a valid interpretation of simply the comic. It is only refuted by the official transcript. I believe it is important to acknowledge and may even be a more humorous interpretation than the one which is provided by the official transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we added a speculation section (or something of the sort) then we would have a place to talk about this interpretation more freely and expound upon it more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 15:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Problem is the whole &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; is actually conjecture. None of us the author, we're all just guessing. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 15:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Many of the current explanations are conjecture, that's true but not every explanation. Providing information on the science or mathematics behind a particular comic is not conjecture. Stating whether the author intended to belittle the field or state that one field is superior over another (unless fairly explicitly stated) is. And there are many things which can be inferred without being simple speculation. Not every comic would need a section like this, and not every comic needs a trivia section, and I'm not ready to start adding this proposed section myself. But I think it should be considered. [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 15:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The intention of the discussion pages was to serve as a place for people to put their conjecture and reaching interpretations of the comics. They're presented alongside the explanation to make people's interpretations more readily visible. Some people may have trouble distinguishing an ungrounded interpretation of a comic from an explanation of it, and they will insert weak text into explanations. If you find something you disagree with, feel free to bring it up in the discussion section and edit it out of the explanation liberally '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 06:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unixkcd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone. I was just wondering: is there anything on http://uni.xkcd.com/. Because I was just looking and the only thing I found on Unixkcd is a mention of a bug in [[1350]]. There is not even a mention on the April fools article.&lt;br /&gt;
:There's nothing on this site, there's a couple of novel tidbits on the xkcd site that are at best tangentially related to the comic, as Randall originally intended to make xkcd.com his personal site for hosting his own projects. That particular one doesn't show up in any comics. Also, proposals might not be the best place to put this. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 08:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New character category for blonde woman news reporter (from 1699) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From today's comic [[1699: Local News]] I just got the idea that there may be needing a new category for either blonde woman and/or comics with news reports. I posted this [[Talk:1699:_Local_News#New_character_category|post]], in the talk page of that comic. Any comments, and if agreeing that there might be one or two different character categories needed then please suggest what they should be called. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree with Blondie as new character name and with adding a category for news reports. [[User:Jkshapiro|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro|talk]]) 00:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agree with new character category for Blondie --[[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 12:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for the replies. Could be nice with a few more chipping in. One issue I just found is  [[Miss Lenhart]] and ambiguous situations like in comic [[59: Graduation]], where I would remove the miss reference. But then miss would be a sub category of Blondie (or Blonde? which Randall cals the girl in 59) as [[Rob]] is for [[Cueball]]... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I think blondie is fine for a name. Miss Lenhart is another character who uses a similar design so I think treating her like Rob is perfectly acceptable. The only thing more I think we should discuss is the role blondie plays in most of the comics (Like how cueball is an everyman, whitehat is often a strawman, Blackhat is blackhat etc.) [[User:Lackadaisical|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical|talk]]) 12:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== fix a page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page Comics featuring Summer Glau is missing:&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/526:_Converting_to_Metric {{unsigned ip|108.162.241.130}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. In the future, you can add categories yourself, just scroll to the bottom and follow the template the others go by. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;{{Color|#707|David}}&amp;lt;font color=#070 size=3&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=#508 size=4&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 03:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New xkcd book out. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any chance of posting a section of explanation pages for the cartoons in the new xkcd book, hopefully explaining some of the cryptic red notes? Thanks! {{unsigned ip|199.27.133.102}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Business Plan category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose renaming [[Category:Beret Guy's Business]] into Business Plans, and adding it to [[1721: Business Idea]] [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 08:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125361</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125361"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:12:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea2.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, cueball proposes buying premium gas at cheaper prices, and presumably reselling later.  This would not be profitable as Cueball would sirens more driving to the gas stations whenever someone bought premium gas than we could get selling the premium gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Cueball purposes digging up the underground storage containers of gas and stealing them.  This could be very easily profitable.  It is also illegal and very obvious, and Cueball would quickly be caught trying to sell the gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* Because this comic has the same title (and filename) as comic [[827]], Randall inadvertently broke both his website and this one when it went up.  The main xkcd site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript| Not sure proper formatting.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[First panel]&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball standing next to a board display, possibly a projector screen]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: Thank you all for coming.&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: I have an exciting business opportunity to share.&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Second panel]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: Now hear me out -&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Your ideas are always the worst.&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: No, no, this time it's a good one! I promise.&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Uh Huh...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Third panel]&lt;br /&gt;
[Display shows image of gas pump]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: When someone fills their car with premium gas, some of it is left in the hose, and is dispensed to the next customer even if they've only paid for regular.  If we create a network of-&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: I'm leaving.&lt;br /&gt;
Someone else off screen: Me too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125360</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125360"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T08:09:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea2.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, cueball proposes buying premium gas at cheaper prices, and presumably reselling later.  This would not be profitable as Cueball would sirens more driving to the gas stations whenever someone bought premium gas than we could get selling the premium gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Cueball purposes digging up the underground storage containers of gas and stealing them.  This could be very easily profitable.  It is also illegal and very obvious, and Cueball would quickly be caught trying to sell the gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* Because this comic has the same title (and filename) as comic [[827]], Randall inadvertently broke both his website and this one when it went up.  The main xkcd site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript| Not sure proper formatting.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[First panel]&lt;br /&gt;
[Cueball standing next to a board display, possibly a projector screen]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: Thank you all for coming.&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: I have an exciting business opportunity to share.&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Second panel]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: Now hear me out -&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Your ideas are always the worst.&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: No, no, this time it's a good one! I promise.&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: Uh Huh...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Third panel]&lt;br /&gt;
[Display shows image of gas pump]&lt;br /&gt;
Cueball: When someone fills their car with premium gas, some of it is left in the hose, and is dispensed to the next customer even if they've only paid for regular.  If we create a network of-&lt;br /&gt;
Off screen: I'm leaving.&lt;br /&gt;
Someone else off screen: Me too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125359</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125359"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T07:59:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea2.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, cueball proposes buying premium gas at cheaper prices, and presumably reselling later.  This would not be profitable as Cueball would sirens more driving to the gas stations whenever someone bought premium gas than we could get selling the premium gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, Cueball purposes digging up the underground storage containers of gas and stealing them.  This could be very easily profitable.  It is also illegal and very obvious, and Cueball would quickly be caught trying to sell the gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* Because this comic has the same title (and filename) as comic [[827]], Randall inadvertently broke both his website and this one when it went up.  The main xkcd site showed this comic for both numbers, while explainxkcd showed 827 for both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125356</id>
		<title>1721: Business Idea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1721:_Business_Idea&amp;diff=125356"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T05:24:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1721&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Business Idea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = business_idea2.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Then we move to phase two. Gas stations store fuel in underground tanks. Normally, these are inaccessible except via the pump. However, with hydraulic fracturing, we-- Wait! Come back!&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:business_idea.png&amp;diff=125355</id>
		<title>File:business idea.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:business_idea.png&amp;diff=125355"/>
				<updated>2016-08-17T05:23:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1720:_Horses&amp;diff=125299</id>
		<title>Talk:1720: Horses</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1720:_Horses&amp;diff=125299"/>
				<updated>2016-08-15T21:43:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* White Hat -- salesman or owner? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Except, no one really worries about drunk drivers driving into a tree. If that happens, I'd say its all good, servers them right... The real problem is drunk drivers running into other drivers, pedestrians, property, etc. And even back in the days of horses and carriages, when forced to go at full gallop the horses would not be able to prevent such mistakes. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.210.238|162.158.210.238]] 13:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;Uh, no. That's not how it works at all. If that was the case nobody would have shown up to my dad's funeral. People should worry about drunk drivers hitting anything, and more importantly be worried about them getting behind the wheel in the first place. Fuck you for saying it serves him right, lets see how you feel when your family member dies because of a reckless accident.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.128}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A horse is a low tech version of KARR. Surely we want a KITT?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.49|141.101.98.49]] 14:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A badly-driven horse can toss-off its owner&amp;quot;... *fnar fnar*.  Perhaps &amp;quot;throw off&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;buck&amp;quot; would mesh less easily with the remnants of immature adolescent brain that I still possess? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.75|141.101.98.75]] 14:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alert: your car has noticed a wolf.  Initiating auto-ejection procedure.  Notice: your car has driven over a rattlesnake.  Initiating horn honking and spinning out.  WARNING: your car has drawn the attention of a pickup of the opposite sex.  Program Sexy-fun-times is now running.  Sux to be you. ~~ Siliconwolf {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Like[[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 21:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== White Hat -- salesman or owner? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I personally think white hat is a salesman because in the title text a different car is described.  It could be a different person describing it, or that white hat owns multiple cars (though given his friendship with black hat, this seems unlikely).  I further think that the incomplete tag should be either removed or moved to the transcript section, and a note made in the article.  '''Vote: salesman, vote: remove incomplete tag''' [[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 21:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1720:_Horses&amp;diff=125298</id>
		<title>Talk:1720: Horses</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1720:_Horses&amp;diff=125298"/>
				<updated>2016-08-15T21:37:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Except, no one really worries about drunk drivers driving into a tree. If that happens, I'd say its all good, servers them right... The real problem is drunk drivers running into other drivers, pedestrians, property, etc. And even back in the days of horses and carriages, when forced to go at full gallop the horses would not be able to prevent such mistakes. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.210.238|162.158.210.238]] 13:22, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;Uh, no. That's not how it works at all. If that was the case nobody would have shown up to my dad's funeral. People should worry about drunk drivers hitting anything, and more importantly be worried about them getting behind the wheel in the first place. Fuck you for saying it serves him right, lets see how you feel when your family member dies because of a reckless accident.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.128}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A horse is a low tech version of KARR. Surely we want a KITT?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.49|141.101.98.49]] 14:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A badly-driven horse can toss-off its owner&amp;quot;... *fnar fnar*.  Perhaps &amp;quot;throw off&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;buck&amp;quot; would mesh less easily with the remnants of immature adolescent brain that I still possess? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.75|141.101.98.75]] 14:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alert: your car has noticed a wolf.  Initiating auto-ejection procedure.  Notice: your car has driven over a rattlesnake.  Initiating horn honking and spinning out.  WARNING: your car has drawn the attention of a pickup of the opposite sex.  Program Sexy-fun-times is now running.  Sux to be you. ~~ Siliconwolf {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.67}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Like[[User:Mikemk|Mikemk]] ([[User talk:Mikemk|talk]]) 21:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1707:_xkcd_Phone_4&amp;diff=123419</id>
		<title>1707: xkcd Phone 4</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1707:_xkcd_Phone_4&amp;diff=123419"/>
				<updated>2016-07-15T22:15:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mikemk: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1707&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 15, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = xkcd Phone 4&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = xkcd_phone_4.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The SpaceX system carefully guides falling phones down to the surface, a process which the phones increasingly often survive without exploding.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Not everything explained}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is another entry in the xkcd Phone series (see [[1363: xkcd Phone]], [[1465: xkcd Phone 2]] and [[1549: XKCD Phone 3]]), and once again, the comic plays with many standard tech buzzwords to create a phone that sounds impressive but would actually be very impractical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the top, going clockwise:&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18,000 μAh (micro-Ampere hours) nickel-lithium-iron battery (non-rechargeable)''' Phone battery capacity is measured in {{w|ampere-hour}}s (which thanks to the magic of {{w|dimensional analysis}}, is just an unusual way of denoting electric charge, which equals 3600 Coulombs). Usually, the capacity is quoted in milliampere-hours (one-thousandth, or 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, of an ampere hour); however, this one is quoted in ''micro''ampere-hours (one-millionth, or 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, of an ampere-hour), presumably as a marketing ploy to give a more impressive-looking number. Quoted in more standard terms, this phone's battery capacity is 18 mAh. In comparison, an iPhone 6+ has a battery capacity of 2,750 mAh.  This phone's battery is dreadful (under a typical current draw of 0.1A, it would power the phone for about 11 minutes). There is nothing normally called a &amp;quot;nickel-lithium-iron battery&amp;quot; - rather, this seems to be a [[739|malamanteau]] of the experimental {{w|nickel–lithium battery}} and the common {{w|lithium ion battery}} (which does not contain any iron) or the lithium-iron-phosphate battery, often called lithium-iron, but more often called the LiFePO battery. The {{w|nickel–iron battery}} may contain {{w|lithium hydroxide}}, but it's ''terrible'' for most applications. Worse, this battery is non-rechargeable, meaning that it would have to be replaced to use the phone again after it is exhausted (every 11 minutes, at that!).&lt;br /&gt;
** [[XKCD Phone 3]] was powered by two {{w|AA battery|AA batteries}} (not included), which have an energy capacity roughly 100 times larger.&lt;br /&gt;
** Many devices have a small second battery which is only used for keeping the clock time.  This could be such a battery.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Subwoofer''' - A {{w|subwoofer}} is a large bass speaker, which this is not. Some phones do have high-quality speakers for playing music, but these are not placed right next to the earpiece - this would be a surefire way to deafen your users. When put next to Dog Whistle, this is probably a pun, since both relate to dogs; the sound a dog makes, at least in English is &amp;quot;Woof&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;quot;Dog whistle&amp;quot;''' - A {{w|dog whistle}} is a high-pitched whistle that humans cannot hear, but dogs can.  In speaker terminology, a bass speaker is called a {{w|woofer}} because it could reproduce the low pitch of a dog bark.  A treble speaker is a {{w|tweeter}}; if this &amp;quot;whistle&amp;quot; is actually a speaker, it might be termed a ''supertweeter''. The scare quotes around the term add to the idea that whatever it is called is not what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[xkcd Phone 2]] contained a &amp;quot;dog noticer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Non-porous, washable''' - On the one hand, it's rare for a phone to be made of porous materials. On the other, there are legitimately waterproof phones that seal the speakers and ports with rubber.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[xkcd Phone 2]] was also washable (though only once).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''WebMD'' partnership: cough-activated feature reads aloud a random diagnosis for &amp;quot;coughing&amp;quot;''' - {{w|WebMD}} is a website to help people diagnose themselves. For the vast majority of people, a cough just means an irritated throat or maybe a cold, but selecting randomly from all WebMD diagnoses gives some much more ominous - if very unlikely - ones, including {{w|ricin}} poisoning, {{w|plague}}, {{w|lung cancer}} and {{w|radiation poisoning}}.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Wings''' - These {{w|wings}} resemble the ones found on {{w|sanitary towel}}s (sometimes called &amp;quot;pads&amp;quot;, making this a possible iPad pun) which attach the pad to the {{w|gusset}} and keep it in place between the woman's legs during her period ({{w|Menstruation}} cycle).  If actually functional as {{w|aerodynamic}} wings, they would likely come into play when the &amp;quot;SpaceX&amp;quot; impact protection feature becomes engaged.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[XKCD Phone 3]] had a similarly positioned wristband.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Beveled bezel''' - The ''bezel'' is the  ring around the edge of watches and screens. This one's {{w|bevel}}ed, which means it's cut at an angle.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bezeled bevel''' - Punning on the above. Doesn't make much sense, but could mean that it features a beveled edge which is surrounded by a bezel.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Seedless''' - Fruit such as grapes can be &amp;quot;seedless&amp;quot;, which means that they're grown from a special {{w|cultivar}} that doesn't grow seeds in the normal way. Making a phone seedless probably won't do anything, but {{w|Random seed|it might hurt}} its {{w|random number generator}}.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[XKCD Phone 3]] was boneless.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Water resistant down to 30 meters and below 50''' - {{w|Water resistance}} is often measured in terms of how deep an object can be submerged, since pressure increases with depth. In this case, the phone can be submerged to almost any depth, but there's an odd lacuna between 30 meters and 50 meters. It also plays with the confusion in describing depths greater than 50m as &amp;quot;below 50&amp;quot;.  Alternatively, this might indicate the phone must remain dry above 50 meters altitude.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[xkcd Phone]] and [[XKCD Phone 3]] could drown.  The latter was otherwise waterproof.  [[xkcd Phone 2]] was only waterproof internally.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Turing-complete''' - A computer is {{w|Turing completeness|Turing complete}} if it can perform all the operations needed to simulate a {{w|Turing machine}}. All modern computers are usually described as Turing complete, which would make this not very impressive, but no computer can ever be Turing complete in the truest sense (since they can only ever have a finite amount of memory) - if the xkcd Phone 4 is truly a universal computer, it's ''very'' impressive indeed.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Gregorian/Julian calendar date switch''' - The {{w|Julian calendar}} is the predecessor to the modern {{w|Gregorian calendar}} - the difference is that the two calendars calculate leap years differently. The Julian calendar is still used occasionally - mainly by Eastern Orthodox Christians - but it's not something so vital that it needs a hardwired switch on the front of the phone.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''''SpaceX'' impact protection: when dropped, phone lands on barge''' - The rocket company {{w|SpaceX}} recently trialed a {{w|SpaceX reusable launch system development program|reusable rocket stage}} which after separating from the launch vehicle, lands on a {{w|Autonomous spaceport drone ship|drone barge}} to be reused. The alt-text pokes fun at the number of SpaceX rockets that [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3wZRdg-Tmo crashed and exploded] before they got the landing gear right.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Parallel port''' - A {{w|parallel port}} is a type of interface which transfers high-volume simultaneous data.  It was often used to connect printers and other devices to computers, but was generally considered obsolete by the time smartphones began to appear on the market, and would be very bulky and slow compared to the USB ports generally used in phones.  It was commonly found together with {{w|serial port}}s, which are used for low-volume sequential data such as [[485: Depth|mouse]] [[1110: Click and Drag|movements]].  Here it is paired with a serial interface for analog data with parallel outputs for several people.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12 headphone jacks''' - Phones often include a single headphone jack to allow the user to privately listen to a call, play music, etc. Twelve of them would be pointless overkill, especially given the difficulty of getting twelve people close enough to all use their headphones. Presumably joking about the [http://www.businessinsider.com.au/apple-headphone-jack-iphone-side-effects-2016-7#/#smaller-headphone-makers-would-be-at-a-disadvantage-4 constant rumours] that Apple's next iPhone will not have any headphone jacks, and the weird vents on the bottom of the phone.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Onboard cloud''' - The &amp;quot;cloud&amp;quot; is a catch-all term for the use of remote computers to store data, providing a backup if all local copies are lost and allowing the data to be accessed from a broad network. An &amp;quot;onboard cloud&amp;quot; would thus be a contradiction in terms, and appears to be a marketing ploy to use the &amp;quot;cloud&amp;quot; buzzword to describe the device's onboard storage capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''New BrightGlo&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;TM&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; display incorporates genetically spliced jellyfish protein (should have used the glowing genes, not the stinging ones)''' - {{w|Aequorea victoria}} jellyfish contain a protein called {{w|green fluorescent protein}}, the gene for which has been isolated and can be used in many ways. Unfortunately, they took the wrong gene, and ended up getting [http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-015-1568-3 one of the hundreds of proteins from jellyfish venom], which will presumably mean that touching the screen becomes a painful experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''✓ Certified''' - Not certified for anything in particular.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Software-defined''' {{w|Software-defined radio}}s are quite popular in some areas, meaning the radio hardware is quite universal and can be adapted to different radio protocols just by  changing software. SDR would actually be quite a nice feature for a cellphone. Of course it doesn't specify if it's the radio that is software defined.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Exposed ductwork''' - A phone shouldn't even have ductwork, unless it has a very sophisticated cooling system, but this could supply air to the dog whistle. Exposed ductwork is a trademark of {{w|Bowellism|Bowellist}} architecture such as the {{w|Lloyd's Building}} in London and the {{w|Pompidou Centre}} in Paris. Exposed ductwork is also considered a crucial flaw in a death star. May also refer to a transparent window in the side of the phone allowing the user to see the circuitry inside, similar to computer cases with transparent side panels popular among DIY computing enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Voice interaction: {{w|Siri (software)|Siri}}, {{w|Cortana (software)|Cortana}}, {{w|Google Now}} and {{w|Amazon Echo|Alexa}} respond simultaneously''' - These are all {{w|intelligent personal assistant software}} (from Apple, Microsoft, Google and Amazon respectively) and all do the same thing: control your phone and answer questions using speech recognition. Having all four talk at once would mean you'd have a total cacophony while gaining nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[XKCD Phone 3]] might have included Siri.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Did you know &amp;quot;4&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;IV&amp;quot; in Roman numerals?&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;®©™&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' - the tenth version of Apple's {{w|operating system}} for its {{w|Macintosh computer}} was labeled {{w|OS X}}, which was intended to be read as &amp;quot;oh ess ten&amp;quot;.  {{w|Steve Jobs}} was irritated that everyone else preferred &amp;quot;oh ess ecks&amp;quot;.  This phrase is labeled with trademark and copyright symbols, as if someone desires it to be the product's {{w|tagline}} but has poor understanding of relevant laws.  In particular, &amp;quot;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;{{w|™}}&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;quot; is a symbol for {{w|unregistered trademark}}s while &amp;quot;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;{{w|®}}&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;quot; is a symbol for {{w|registered trademark}}s.  If the phrase were an unregistered trademark, the owner would be prohibited from using &amp;quot;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;{{w|®}}&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Smartphones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mikemk</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>