<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Techblogger</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Techblogger"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Techblogger"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T19:01:16Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:217:_e_to_the_pi_Minus_pi&amp;diff=218338</id>
		<title>Talk:217: e to the pi Minus pi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:217:_e_to_the_pi_Minus_pi&amp;diff=218338"/>
				<updated>2021-09-23T08:06:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Techblogger: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Asserting that the programmers' algorithms truncated to three decimal digits is an unsupported and unnecessary extrapolation.  Most floating-point implementations use binary, not decimal, and 19.999099979 ''looks'' very much like a rounding error in binary floating-point that has accumulated over several operations. [[User:Daddy|Daddy]] ([[User talk:Daddy|talk]]) 12:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fixed. [[User:Xhfz|Xhfz]] ([[User talk:Xhfz|talk]]) 22:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;not good at math&amp;quot; might be too harsh, if they've (tried to) read the floating point spec.  Depending on precision and rounding regime and order of operations, I could easily imagine the &amp;quot;equation&amp;quot; to be true ... and therefore a test that you were rounding &amp;quot;properly&amp;quot;, even when it wasn't intuitive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third bullet-point above needs changing... (9^2+(19^2/22))=97.4090909091 which is close to pi to the fourth power, so it should be (as noted in the text) (9^2+(19^2/22))^1/4  [[User:Squirreltape|Squirreltape]] ([[User talk:Squirreltape|talk]]) 19:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, in-case you didn't notice, it says &amp;quot;∜(9² + 19²/22)&amp;quot;, not just the sum on its own. I checked the sum on my calculator, and it is equal to what the page is saying. &amp;quot;∜(9² + 19²/22)&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;4th root of (9^2+19^2/22)&amp;quot; (What the title text is saying), or on Windows Calculator, &amp;quot;(9^2+19^2/22) yroot(4)&amp;quot; (Basically what the sum is saying). So, the 3rd bullet point is correct. --[[User:Katavschi|Katavschi]] ([[User talk:Katavschi|talk]]) 22:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It says above that (π + 20)^i ≈ -i, but this should be (π + 20)^i ≈ -1. Proof: π + 20 ≈ e^π =&amp;gt; (π + 20)^i ≈ (e^π)^i = e^(πi) = -1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACM competitions are famous for being under tight time pressure. Making your own team waste time would absolutely get you kicked out (and make enemies) [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 04:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;quot;If they thought about the mathematics&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hm, are you saying it is obvious that e^ pi - pi is not 20? How would you know without approximating it? The sum of two irrationals is not necessarily irrational. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.194|162.158.34.194]] 01:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:approximate e^pi using slightly bigger numbers than e and pi (say e: 2.7183 and pi: 3.1416) and subtract a value that is slightly smaller than pi (say 3.1415). The result is less than 20 and a upper limit for e^pi - pi [[Special:Contributions/141.101.93.49|141.101.93.49]] 19:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the [title](https://myighack.com/) text was close; the real identity is e^(π - 2) = π [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.165|173.245.52.165]] 05:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Techblogger</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>