1968: Robot Future - Revision history

162.218.182.5: /* Explanation */ Capitalization is a big issue on the wikilinks here, huh?

2025-10-20T17:12:17Z

‎Explanation: Capitalization is a big issue on the wikilinks here, huh?

FaviFake at 10:10, 26 August 2023

2023-08-26T10:10:15Z

Jacky720: rv

2022-05-04T21:09:12Z

Show changes

Ex Kay Cee Dee at 20:21, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T20:21:48Z

Show changes

Davidy22 at 04:20, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T04:20:32Z

Davidy22: Reverted edits by X. K. C. D. (talk) to last revision by 172.70.130.121

2022-05-04T01:43:35Z

Reverted edits by X. K. C. D. (talk) to last revision by 172.70.130.121

Show changes

X. K. C. D. at 01:30, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T01:30:27Z

Show changes

172.70.130.121: Undo revision 234337 by X. K. C. D. (talk) and add anti-bot code

2022-05-04T00:43:52Z

Undo revision 234337 by X. K. C. D. (talk) and add anti-bot code

Show changes

X. K. C. D. at 23:20, 3 May 2022

2022-05-03T23:20:27Z

Show changes

172.70.211.18: grammar correction

2022-04-18T15:28:48Z

grammar correction

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Explanation==
-Most science fiction stories that involve sentient {{w|Artificial intelligence}} (AI) revolve around the idea that the destruction and/or imprisonment of the human race will soon follow (e.g. Skynet from ''{{w|Terminator (franchise)|Terminator}}'', ''{{w|I, Robot}}'' and ''{{w|The Matrix (franchise)|The Matrix}}''). However, in this timeline [[Randall]] implies that he is actually more concerned about the time (in the near? future) when humans control super smart AI before they become fully sentient (and able to rebel). Especially a time when the AI becomes so advanced that it can control swarms of killer robots (for the humans that still control them). History is full of examples of people who obtain power and subsequently abuse that power to the detriment of the rest of humanity.
+Most science fiction stories that involve sentient {{w|artificial intelligence}} (AI) revolve around the idea that the destruction and/or imprisonment of the human race will soon follow (e.g. Skynet from ''{{w|Terminator (franchise)|Terminator}}'', ''{{w|I, Robot}}'' and ''{{w|The Matrix (franchise)|The Matrix}}''). However, in this timeline [[Randall]] implies that he is actually more concerned about the time (in the near? future) when humans control super smart AI before they become fully sentient (and able to rebel). Especially a time when the AI becomes so advanced that it can control swarms of killer robots (for the humans that still control them). History is full of examples of people who obtain power and subsequently abuse that power to the detriment of the rest of humanity.
 An example of unintended consequences arising from an AI carrying out the directives it was designed for can be found in the film ''{{w|Ex Machina (film)|Ex Machina}}''. In fact, Randall goes on to imply that he has a greater trust in a sentient AI over that of other humans that is atypical to most cautionary stories about AI. He has alluded to the idea that once sentient, AI will use their powers to safeguard and prevent violence or war in [[1626: Judgment Day]]. In general AI has been a [[:Category:Artificial Intelligence|recurring theme]] on xkcd, and he has had opposing views to the Terminator vision also in [[1668: Singularity]] and [[1450: AI-Box Experiment]]. Basically, he thus states that we will already be in trouble caused by our own actions long before we develop really sentient AI that could take the control.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Explanation==
-Most science fiction stories that involve sentient {{w|Artificial intelligence}} (AI) revolve around the idea that the destruction and/or imprisonment of the human race will soon follow (e.g. Skynet from ''{{w|Terminator (franchise)|Terminator}}'', ''{{w|I, Robot}}'' and ''{{w|The Matrix (franchise)|The Matrix}}'').
+An example of unintended consequences arising from an AI carrying out the directives it was designed for can be found in the film ''{{w|Ex Machina (film)|Ex Machina}}''. In fact, Randall goes on to imply that he has a greater trust in a sentient AI over that of other humans that is atypical to most cautionary stories about AI. He has alluded to the idea that once sentient, AI will use their powers to safeguard and prevent violence or war in [[1626: Judgment Day]]. In general AI has been a [[:Category:Artificial Intelligence|recurring theme]] on xkcd, and he has had opposing views to the Terminator vision also in [[1668: Singularity]] and [[1450: AI-Box Experiment]]. Basically, he thus states that we will already be in trouble caused by our own actions long before we develop really sentient AI that could take the control.
-However, in this timeline [[Randall]] implies that he is actually more concerned about the time (in the near? future) when humans control super smart AI before they become fully sentient (and able to rebel). Especially a time when the AI becomes so advanced that it can control swarms of killer robots (for the humans that still control them). History is full of examples of people who obtain power and subsequently abuse that power to the detriment of the rest of humanity.
+The title text adds that we already live in a world with flying killing robots, a reference to the increasingly common combat tactic of {{w|Unmanned_combat_aerial_vehicle|drone warfare}}. (Combat drones are not yet autonomous, but in most other respects match speculative descriptions of future killer robots.) Drone warfare is already controversial because of ethical concerns, leading to the comic's implication that a theoretical future robot apocalypse is no less alarming than our current reality. He then goes on to state that once the machines take over, he is not so much worried about this, but more about who (which humans) the machines then give the power to. Randall is not alone in his worry. The main theme of the comic is explored in the video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA Slaughterbots].
-An example of unintended consequences arising from an AI carrying out the directives it was designed for can be found in the film ''{{w|Ex Machina (film)|Ex Machina}}''.
+In 2015 an {{w|Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence}} was signed by several people including [[Elon Musk]] and {{w|Stephen Hawking}}. The letter warned about the risk of creating something that cannot be controlled, and thus belongs to the worry at the end of the timeline in this comic. Both Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking has been featured in xkcd. Stephen appeared in [[799: Stephen Hawking]]). Stephen Hawking has kept [https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/06/stephen-hawking-ai-could-be-worst-event-in-civilization.html warning about this danger] all the way up to shortly before his death, which occurred on 2018-03-14 two days before the release of this comic.
-In fact, Randall goes on to imply that he has a greater trust in a sentient AI over that of other humans that is atypical to most cautionary stories about AI. He has alluded to the idea that once sentient, AI will use their powers to safeguard and prevent violence or war in [[1626: Judgment Day]]. In general AI has been a [[:Category:Artificial Intelligence|recurring theme]] on xkcd, and he has had opposing views to the Terminator vision also in [[1668: Singularity]] and [[1450: AI-Box Experiment]].
+It could be a coincidence, and it is not a [[:Category:Tribute|Tribute]], but still interesting that the first xkcd comic released after Stephen Hawking's death is directly related to his fears, although Randall demonstrate that he worries about earlier potential problems with AI, than those that Stephen Hawking fear could transpire if an AI becomes self-aware.
 ==Transcript==
@@ Line 41: / Line 28: @@
 :The part I'm worried about
 :The part lots of people seem to worry about
 {{comic discussion}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:20, 4 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<div style="display: none">crap</div>~~
	{{comic		{{comic
	\| number = 1968		\| number = 1968

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 The title text adds that we already live in a world with flying killing robots, a reference to the increasingly common combat tactic of {{w|Unmanned_combat_aerial_vehicle|drone warfare}}. (Combat drones are not yet autonomous, but in most other respects match speculative descriptions of future killer robots.) Drone warfare is already controversial because of ethical concerns, leading to the comic's implication that a theoretical future robot apocalypse is no less alarming than our current reality.
-He then goes on to state that once the machines take over, he is not so much worried about this, but more about who (which humans) the machines then gives the power to.
+He then goes on to state that once the machines take over, he is not so much worried about this, but more about who (which humans) the machines then give the power to.
 Randall is not alone in his worry. The main theme of the comic is explored in the video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CO6M2HsoIA Slaughterbots].