Talk:1024: Error Code - Revision history

2804:DA4:207:7700:5DF5:1047:C56A:3A63 at 19:08, 17 August 2025

2025-08-17T19:08:16Z

172.69.79.209: There is no error -41 on Linux.

2022-03-23T02:58:17Z

There is no error -41 on Linux.

Yfmcpxpj: 404 error code

2020-09-13T19:30:04Z

404 error code

162.158.34.46 at 14:31, 5 September 2019

2019-09-05T14:31:38Z

173.245.50.174 at 09:46, 7 September 2015

2015-09-07T09:46:58Z

173.245.54.166: Added a comment.

2015-04-03T19:02:09Z

Added a comment.

Weatherlawyer at 23:29, 21 January 2015

2015-01-21T23:29:18Z

108.162.210.241 at 00:49, 29 December 2014

2014-12-29T00:49:40Z

108.162.237.192 at 21:34, 20 November 2014

2014-11-20T21:34:50Z

Davidy22 at 07:44, 22 October 2014

2014-10-22T07:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 17 August 2025
Line 40:		Line 40:

	The choice of -41 is interesting, because at least on Linux x86_64, there '''is''' no error 41 in the standard error codes (errno -ls). Instead, between ''ELOOP 40 Too many levels of symbolic links'' and ''ENOMSG 42 No message of desired type'' is ''EWOULDBLOCK 11 Resource temporarily unavailable'' (11 is the same code as ''EAGAIN''). Seems likely that Randall deliberately picked an error code that doesn't exist. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.209\|172.69.79.209]] 02:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)		The choice of -41 is interesting, because at least on Linux x86_64, there '''is''' no error 41 in the standard error codes (errno -ls). Instead, between ''ELOOP 40 Too many levels of symbolic links'' and ''ENOMSG 42 No message of desired type'' is ''EWOULDBLOCK 11 Resource temporarily unavailable'' (11 is the same code as ''EAGAIN''). Seems likely that Randall deliberately picked an error code that doesn't exist. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.209\|172.69.79.209]] 02:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I'm fairly sure that's just a coincidence. Besides, it's negative 41 (or dash 41). [[Special:Contributions/2804:DA4:207:7700:5DF5:1047:C56A:3A63\|2804:DA4:207:7700:5DF5:1047:C56A:3A63]] 19:08, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 23 March 2022
Line 38:		Line 38:
	404 is a response code, not an error code [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.46\|162.158.34.46]] 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)		404 is a response code, not an error code [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.46\|162.158.34.46]] 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
	:Yes, {{w\|HTTP 404}} is an {{w\|HTTP response code}}, but ''one that specifically represents an error condition''...so HTTP 404 is indeed an {{w\|HTTP response code#4xx client errors\|error code}} (as opposed to, say, a ''{{w\|HTTP response code#2xx success\|success code}}''). — [[User:Yfmcpxpj\|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj\|talk]]) 19:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)		:Yes, {{w\|HTTP 404}} is an {{w\|HTTP response code}}, but ''one that specifically represents an error condition''...so HTTP 404 is indeed an {{w\|HTTP response code#4xx client errors\|error code}} (as opposed to, say, a ''{{w\|HTTP response code#2xx success\|success code}}''). — [[User:Yfmcpxpj\|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj\|talk]]) 19:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	The choice of -41 is interesting, because at least on Linux x86_64, there '''is''' no error 41 in the standard error codes (errno -ls). Instead, between ''ELOOP 40 Too many levels of symbolic links'' and ''ENOMSG 42 No message of desired type'' is ''EWOULDBLOCK 11 Resource temporarily unavailable'' (11 is the same code as ''EAGAIN''). Seems likely that Randall deliberately picked an error code that doesn't exist. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.209\|172.69.79.209]] 02:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 13 September 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:

	404 is a response code, not an error code [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.46\|162.158.34.46]] 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)		404 is a response code, not an error code [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.46\|162.158.34.46]] 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
		+	:Yes, {{w\|HTTP 404}} is an {{w\|HTTP response code}}, but ''one that specifically represents an error condition''...so HTTP 404 is indeed an {{w\|HTTP response code#4xx client errors\|error code}} (as opposed to, say, a ''{{w\|HTTP response code#2xx success\|success code}}''). — [[User:Yfmcpxpj\|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj\|talk]]) 19:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 5 September 2019
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Let's see... I think that means "you get a free sample of brain bleach". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.166\|173.245.54.166]] 19:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)		Let's see... I think that means "you get a free sample of brain bleach". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.166\|173.245.54.166]] 19:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	404 is a response code, not an error code [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.46\|162.158.34.46]] 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 7 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Motherboard error codes are not numbered like other error codes are. Motherboard error codes are just referred to by how the beeps sound (ex. 1 long, 2 short) [[User:Luke1042\|Luke1042]]		Motherboard error codes are not numbered like other error codes are. Motherboard error codes are just referred to by how the beeps sound (ex. 1 long, 2 short) [[User:Luke1042\|Luke1042]]
		+	:Long, long, short, long would mean it's approaching a crossing. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.174\|173.245.50.174]] 09:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

	Personally, of all motherboard beeping codes, I always liked "No beep = Power supply, system board problem, disconnected CPU, or disconnected speaker...." (Well, when not suffering it myself. And even then I could stand it when it was just the latter and thus of no ''immediate'' consequence...) [[Special:Contributions/31.111.103.76\|31.111.103.76]] 22:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)		Personally, of all motherboard beeping codes, I always liked "No beep = Power supply, system board problem, disconnected CPU, or disconnected speaker...." (Well, when not suffering it myself. And even then I could stand it when it was just the latter and thus of no ''immediate'' consequence...) [[Special:Contributions/31.111.103.76\|31.111.103.76]] 22:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 3 April 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:

	What do they say about code 34?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 23:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)		What do they say about code 34?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 23:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Let's see... I think that means "you get a free sample of brain bleach". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.166\|173.245.54.166]] 19:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 21 January 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The guy has a lot of these books. http://xkcd.com/330/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.241\|108.162.210.241]] 00:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)		The guy has a lot of these books. http://xkcd.com/330/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.241\|108.162.210.241]] 00:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	What do they say about code 34?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 23:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 29 December 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Did... did anyone ever make this book? Somebody should get on that.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.192\|108.162.237.192]] 21:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)		Did... did anyone ever make this book? Somebody should get on that.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.192\|108.162.237.192]] 21:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	The guy has a lot of these books. http://xkcd.com/330/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.241\|108.162.210.241]] 00:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 20 November 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	It's called a sarcastic comment, though it's technically irony. It's very common for english speaking people to say "well, that's helpful" when the intended understanding is exactly the opposite.--[[User:guest\|guest]] 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)		It's called a sarcastic comment, though it's technically irony. It's very common for english speaking people to say "well, that's helpful" when the intended understanding is exactly the opposite.--[[User:guest\|guest]] 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Did... did anyone ever make this book? Somebody should get on that.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.192\|108.162.237.192]] 21:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Anyone got any idea what the yellow things in the lake are? They look like they should be significant? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.94|141.101.104.94]] 05:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
-: Those are lily pad flowers. Before they bloom they look like small balls, and some are yellow[https://www.google.com/search?q=yellow+lily+pad+flower&tbm=isch].
+: Those are lily pad flowers. Before they bloom they look like small balls, and some are yellow[https://www.google.com/search?q=yellow+lily+pad+flower&tbm=isch]. {{unsigned ip|199.27.130.216}}
 The guy at the computer should say at the first panel "That's UNhelpful" instead of "That's helpful", shouldn't he? Or maybe I don't know something in english? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.185|108.162.254.185]] 09:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 It's called a sarcastic comment, though it's technically irony. It's very common for english speaking people to say "well, that's helpful" when the intended understanding is exactly the opposite.--[[User:guest|guest]] 08:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)