Talk:1089: Internal Monologue - Revision history

172.69.79.188 at 18:48, 18 November 2023

2023-11-18T18:48:13Z

172.70.251.38 at 08:02, 18 November 2023

2023-11-18T08:02:46Z

108.162.249.190 at 09:26, 7 May 2015

2015-05-07T09:26:52Z

70.29.69.4: /* Discussion From Comments */ deleted non sequitur reply to some grammar nazi

2013-08-21T19:37:15Z

‎Discussion From Comments: deleted non sequitur reply to some grammar nazi

Lcarsos: Reverted edits by 188.143.232.12 (talk) to last revision by 141.131.3.55

2012-11-24T02:06:23Z

Reverted edits by 188.143.232.12 (talk) to last revision by 141.131.3.55

188.143.232.12: /* aScpLGJPHFkP */ new section

2012-11-23T13:39:17Z

‎aScpLGJPHFkP: new section

141.131.3.55: /* The Oxford Comma */

2012-11-23T10:39:53Z

‎The Oxford Comma

108.250.49.120: /* Discussion From Comments */

2012-08-19T06:13:59Z

‎Discussion From Comments

199.106.103.57 at 17:42, 14 August 2012

2012-08-14T17:42:45Z

Waldir: Waldir moved page Talk:Internal Monologue to Talk:1089: Internal Monologue: Mass-moving pages to 'number: title' format, per discussion at explain xkcd:Community portal/Coordination#Page names

2012-08-07T17:58:42Z

Waldir moved page Talk:Internal Monologue to Talk:1089: Internal Monologue: Mass-moving pages to 'number: title' format, per discussion at explain xkcd:Community portal/Coordination#Page names

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :I copied this into the article. [[User:Bugefun|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun|talk]]) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
-Should someone mention how this is a common experience for autistic people known as masking?
+Should someone mention how this is a common experience for autistic people known as masking? {{unsigned ip|172.70.251.3808:02, 18 November 2023|}}
 == Discussion From Comments ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:02, 18 November 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I copied this into the article. [[User:Bugefun\|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun\|talk]]) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)		:I copied this into the article. [[User:Bugefun\|Bugefun]] ([[User talk:Bugefun\|talk]]) 19:58, 1 August 2012 (EDT)
		+
		+	Should someone mention how this is a common experience for autistic people known as masking?

	== Discussion From Comments ==		== Discussion From Comments ==

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ::Joe Green - “if he asks me to recall his name” Well yes, but I just thought that was an unlikely thing for someone to do in such a direct way. Cueball *could* end up being embarrassed in that kind of way though if a friend of his joined the conversation and he wanted to introduce OtherCueball.
 :::Harm - My solution to situations like that is something like “Go on, introduce yourselves,” and then standing back.
 FredG - I think some of the humor of this comic also comes from the fact that in literature and film, a character's "internal monologue" is much less nervous stream-of-consciousness and is usually mostly inappropriate or satirical comments on the situation.
 :Kyle -  On the other hand, "Adaptation" actually features a lot of "nervous stream-of-consciousness" narration.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 21 August 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	FredG - I think some of the humor of this comic also comes from the fact that in literature and film, a character's "internal monologue" is much less nervous stream-of-consciousness and is usually mostly inappropriate or satirical comments on the situation.		FredG - I think some of the humor of this comic also comes from the fact that in literature and film, a character's "internal monologue" is much less nervous stream-of-consciousness and is usually mostly inappropriate or satirical comments on the situation.
	:Kyle - On the other hand, "Adaptation" actually features a lot of "nervous stream-of-consciousness" narration.		:Kyle - On the other hand, "Adaptation" actually features a lot of "nervous stream-of-consciousness" narration.
−
−	#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 24 November 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.		#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.
−
−	~~== aScpLGJPHFkP ==~~
−
−	~~Waklnig in the presence of giants here. Cool thinking all around!~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 23 November 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.		#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.
		+
		+	== aScpLGJPHFkP ==
		+
		+	Waklnig in the presence of giants here. Cool thinking all around!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 23 November 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:Kyle - On the other hand, "Adaptation" actually features a lot of "nervous stream-of-consciousness" narration.		:Kyle - On the other hand, "Adaptation" actually features a lot of "nervous stream-of-consciousness" narration.

−	== The Oxford ~~Comma ==~~	+	#1: The Oxford comma is a matter of style and pinotuatucn; it has nothing to do with grammar. The words and also are redundant, and because the and is a conjunction introducing an independent clause, you should have a comma after ever .#2: Questions of pronunciation have nothing to do with grammar.#3: Your first sentence contains a grammatical error (a dangling modifier) implying that debates are grammatically correct . When joining two words into a single adjective, such as often-controversial , a hyphen is required (but that's a spelling mistake, not a grammatical one). #4: Irregardless is a non-word used by those who have confused regardless with irrespective ; it's an error of diction, not grammar.#6: Another error of diction, not grammar; again explained with a dangling modifier, this time implying that people are not as controversial as other grammar rules .#9: The use of the abbreviations and symbols common to SMS-messaging is a question of style and suitability, not grammar.#12: English has dozens of gender-neutral pronouns it, they, them, theirs, anyone, everyone, nobody, someone, many, few, we, us, one (two, three, four, five, etc.). That simple fact is not a grammar rule , controversial or otherwise.#14: The use of passive voice is a question of style, not grammar. Your explanation contains yet another dangling modifier, which implies that many writers are technically grammatically sound .#15: Placement of pinotuatucn marks is a matter of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#16: The use of apostrophes is a matter of spelling, not grammar.#17: E-mail vs. email: spelling, not grammar.#19: The use of various dashes is a question of pinotuatucn and typography, not grammar.#20: Yet another dangling modifier. Eleven items on your list of grammar rules have nothing to do with grammar; four out of 20 explanations contain grammatical errors themselves, and you are unable to identify 99% of the language's gender-neutral pronouns. Sorry, but you get an F' on this assignment; please stop trying to teach language skills until you acquire some.
−
−	~~Correct me if this~~ is the ~~wrong place for this question~~, but ~~what~~ is ~~the house policy on the Oxford comma?~~ ~~This page had~~ a ~~line which previously read "doing~~ the ~~right things in the conversation~~ and ~~reacting appropriately~~ and not ~~saying 'yeah' too much~~." ~~I corrected~~ it ~~to read "doing the right things in the conversation~~, ~~reacting appropriately~~, and not ~~saying~~ '~~yeah' too much~~,~~" because I haven~~'~~t seen any opinions expressed~~ on this ~~wiki yet regarding punctuation~~.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :::Harm - My solution to situations like that is something like “Go on, introduce yourselves,” and then standing back.
 FredG - I think some of the humor of this comic also comes from the fact that in literature and film, a character's "internal monologue" is much less nervous stream-of-consciousness and is usually mostly inappropriate or satirical comments on the situation.
 == The Oxford Comma ==
 Correct me if this is the wrong place for this question, but what is the house policy on the Oxford comma?  This page had a line which previously read "doing the right things in the conversation and reacting appropriately and not saying 'yeah' too much."  I corrected it to read "doing the right things in the conversation, reacting appropriately, and not saying 'yeah' too much," because I haven't seen any opinions expressed on this wiki yet regarding punctuation.

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:58, 7 August 2012
(No difference)