Talk:1149: Broomstick - Revision history

162.158.159.11 at 15:57, 18 December 2021

2021-12-18T15:57:37Z

Davidy22 at 00:42, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T00:42:55Z

Bbruzzo at 00:34, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T00:34:02Z

24.20.71.198 at 17:26, 1 August 2013

2013-08-01T17:26:16Z

71.215.186.130 at 06:30, 20 January 2013

2013-01-20T06:30:31Z

Lcarsos: indenting saves lives people

2013-01-09T22:32:14Z

indenting saves lives people

198.103.254.251 at 21:53, 9 January 2013

2013-01-09T21:53:25Z

Davidy22 at 06:11, 30 December 2012

2012-12-30T06:11:24Z

99.245.20.210 at 04:22, 30 December 2012

2012-12-30T04:22:32Z

Davidy22 at 02:41, 29 December 2012

2012-12-29T02:41:53Z

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 :That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 The probable reason she didn't do this in the movie (assuming she thought of it) is that Dorothy is a very generous, loving person. If an evil witch who's terrorizing innocent people 24/7 wants something that bad, it's likely the slippers are a weapon or something the with could use to gain more power or do more evil. [[Special:Contributions/24.20.71.198|24.20.71.198]] 17:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)EvanJM42 5:24, 1 August (GMT)
 I don't think that this comic implies that anything bad would happen to Toto- the Witch would have an incentive to treat the dog well, so that she received her broom back without complication. I think the title text is just to emphasize that the problems Dorothy faced were very solvable if her only priority was getting her and her dog home. [[User:Bbruzzo|Bbruzzo]] ([[User talk:Bbruzzo|talk]]) 00:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Whichever user removed the category "Comics featuring Black Hat," commenting that his hat is taller and has a white stripe on it, kindly refer to comic 954, 377, 498, or ANY other comic involving him, and you'll see you're... well, wrong. He has never had a white stripe, and his hat is usually short, but occasionally slightly taller (mostly in the older comics). [[User:Maoman|Maoman]] ([[User talk:Maoman|talk]]) 23:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 :They were saying that his hat has a white stripe in this comic. That guy in the balloon isn't Black Hat. '''[[User:Davidy22|<span title="I want you."><u><font color="purple" size="2px">David</font><font color="green" size="3px">y</font></u><sup><font color="indigo" size="1px">22</font></sup></span>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
@@ Line 44: / Line 42: @@
 The probable reason she didn't do this in the movie (assuming she thought of it) is that Dorothy is a very generous, loving person. If an evil witch who's terrorizing innocent people 24/7 wants something that bad, it's likely the slippers are a weapon or something the with could use to gain more power or do more evil. [[Special:Contributions/24.20.71.198|24.20.71.198]] 17:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)EvanJM42 5:24, 1 August (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 26 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	I don't think that this comic implies that anything bad would happen to Toto- the Witch would have an incentive to treat the dog well, so that she received her broom back without complication. I think the title text is just to emphasize that the problems Dorothy faced were very solvable if her only priority was getting her and her dog home. [[User:Bbruzzo\|Bbruzzo]] ([[User talk:Bbruzzo\|talk]]) 00:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
		+
	Whichever user removed the category "Comics featuring Black Hat," commenting that his hat is taller and has a white stripe on it, kindly refer to comic 954, 377, 498, or ANY other comic involving him, and you'll see you're... well, wrong. He has never had a white stripe, and his hat is usually short, but occasionally slightly taller (mostly in the older comics). [[User:Maoman\|Maoman]] ([[User talk:Maoman\|talk]]) 23:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)		Whichever user removed the category "Comics featuring Black Hat," commenting that his hat is taller and has a white stripe on it, kindly refer to comic 954, 377, 498, or ANY other comic involving him, and you'll see you're... well, wrong. He has never had a white stripe, and his hat is usually short, but occasionally slightly taller (mostly in the older comics). [[User:Maoman\|Maoman]] ([[User talk:Maoman\|talk]]) 23:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
	:They were saying that his hat has a white stripe in this comic. That guy in the balloon isn't Black Hat. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<span title="I want you."><u><font color="purple" size="2px">David</font><font color="green" size="3px">y</font></u><sup><font color="indigo" size="1px">22</font></sup></span>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)		:They were saying that his hat has a white stripe in this comic. That guy in the balloon isn't Black Hat. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<span title="I want you."><u><font color="purple" size="2px">David</font><font color="green" size="3px">y</font></u><sup><font color="indigo" size="1px">22</font></sup></span>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 August 2013
Line 40:		Line 40:

	:That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251\|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)		:That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251\|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	The probable reason she didn't do this in the movie (assuming she thought of it) is that Dorothy is a very generous, loving person. If an evil witch who's terrorizing innocent people 24/7 wants something that bad, it's likely the slippers are a weapon or something the with could use to gain more power or do more evil. [[Special:Contributions/24.20.71.198\|24.20.71.198]] 17:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)EvanJM42 5:24, 1 August (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 20 January 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:I agree that the intention was to close a loophole, but I also was unable to fathom that Dorothy would leave Toto behind. It would be ''way'' out of character for her. If Dorothy had been a more self-centered character, then the title text would be a lot funnier. [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 11:38, 19 December 2012 (EST)		:I agree that the intention was to close a loophole, but I also was unable to fathom that Dorothy would leave Toto behind. It would be ''way'' out of character for her. If Dorothy had been a more self-centered character, then the title text would be a lot funnier. [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 11:38, 19 December 2012 (EST)
		+
		+	:Yes, it would be extremely out of character, considering she was willing to run away from home just to protect Toto in the first place.[[Special:Contributions/71.215.186.130\|71.215.186.130]] 06:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

	:Definitely to close a loophole. Dorothy has something the Witch wants that Dorothy doesn't need except the crazy witch wants to hurt her for them. The Wizard seems to have what she needs but won't give it except for what the witch wants. A trade seems much easier. But of course, who would trust the witch (and why would the untrusting witch start trusting)? All things considered, if you're in a strange land with freaky creatures and frighteningly perverse singalongs, you might consider a Scottish terrier a small price to pay to return to a Kansas farm which, while dull, is far superior to that crazy place. :) [[User:Chriss\|Chriss]] ([[User talk:Chriss\|talk]]) 16:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Chriss		:Definitely to close a loophole. Dorothy has something the Witch wants that Dorothy doesn't need except the crazy witch wants to hurt her for them. The Wizard seems to have what she needs but won't give it except for what the witch wants. A trade seems much easier. But of course, who would trust the witch (and why would the untrusting witch start trusting)? All things considered, if you're in a strange land with freaky creatures and frighteningly perverse singalongs, you might consider a Scottish terrier a small price to pay to return to a Kansas farm which, while dull, is far superior to that crazy place. :) [[User:Chriss\|Chriss]] ([[User talk:Chriss\|talk]]) 16:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Chriss

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 9 January 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to. {{unsigned\|99.245.20.210}}		Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to. {{unsigned\|99.245.20.210}}

−	That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251\|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)	+	:That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251\|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 9 January 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to. {{unsigned\|99.245.20.210}}		Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to. {{unsigned\|99.245.20.210}}
		+
		+	That's right, Dorothy can't get the shoes off her feet, which is why she doesn't give them back to the witch (who is the legitimate owner of them) in the first place. This is the actual loophole that the alt-text is meant to close. [[Special:Contributions/198.103.254.251\|198.103.254.251]] 21:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:11, 30 December 2012
Line 35:		Line 35:


−	Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to.	+	Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to. {{unsigned\|99.245.20.210}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 30 December 2012
Line 33:		Line 33:
	Dorothy didn't know till near the end of the movie that the ruby slippers could get her home. I also want to point out that the Wizard never actually demanded the destruction of the witch. He just asked for her broomstick. The Tin Man suggested "But if we do that, we'd have to kill her to get it". The Wizard neither confirmed nor denied this, merely restating "Bring me her broomstick, and I'll grant your requests". So Dorothy trading for it without killing the witch is perfectly acceptable according to the terms outlined. {{unsigned\|24.72.12.221}}		Dorothy didn't know till near the end of the movie that the ruby slippers could get her home. I also want to point out that the Wizard never actually demanded the destruction of the witch. He just asked for her broomstick. The Tin Man suggested "But if we do that, we'd have to kill her to get it". The Wizard neither confirmed nor denied this, merely restating "Bring me her broomstick, and I'll grant your requests". So Dorothy trading for it without killing the witch is perfectly acceptable according to the terms outlined. {{unsigned\|24.72.12.221}}
	:Furthermore, the good witch was (likely) not going to tell her how to get home until she had learned some valuable lesson. This bypasses the whole ordeal. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96\|76.122.5.96]] 05:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)		:Furthermore, the good witch was (likely) not going to tell her how to get home until she had learned some valuable lesson. This bypasses the whole ordeal. [[Special:Contributions/76.122.5.96\|76.122.5.96]] 05:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Perhaps I'm just remembering Wicked instead of the Wizard of Oz, but I was under the impression that the slippers were stuck to her feet. So she couldn't take them off, even if she wanted to.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 29 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Whichever user removed the category "Comics featuring Black Hat," commenting that his hat is taller and has a white stripe on it, kindly refer to comic 954, 377, 498, or ANY other comic involving him, and you'll see you're... well, wrong. He has never had a white stripe, and his hat is usually short, but occasionally slightly taller (mostly in the older comics). [[User:Maoman\|Maoman]] ([[User talk:Maoman\|talk]]) 23:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)		Whichever user removed the category "Comics featuring Black Hat," commenting that his hat is taller and has a white stripe on it, kindly refer to comic 954, 377, 498, or ANY other comic involving him, and you'll see you're... well, wrong. He has never had a white stripe, and his hat is usually short, but occasionally slightly taller (mostly in the older comics). [[User:Maoman\|Maoman]] ([[User talk:Maoman\|talk]]) 23:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
		+	:They were saying that his hat has a white stripe in this comic. That guy in the balloon isn't Black Hat. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<span title="I want you."><u><font color="purple" size="2px">David</font><font color="green" size="3px">y</font></u><sup><font color="indigo" size="1px">22</font></sup></span>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

	Anyone have any thoughts on the title text? Is that intended to suggest that Toto was an annoyance that Dorothy was happy to be rid of? I'm not really sure why (if) it's supposed to be funny... [[User:TheHYPO\|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO\|talk]]) 15:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)		Anyone have any thoughts on the title text? Is that intended to suggest that Toto was an annoyance that Dorothy was happy to be rid of? I'm not really sure why (if) it's supposed to be funny... [[User:TheHYPO\|TheHYPO]] ([[User talk:TheHYPO\|talk]]) 15:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)