Talk:1210: I'm So Random - Revision history

Herobrine: Forgot the ~

2018-04-06T09:25:51Z

Forgot the ~

Herobrine at 09:25, 6 April 2018

2018-04-06T09:25:31Z

172.68.54.136 at 00:24, 1 November 2016

2016-11-01T00:24:04Z

Dgbrt: Undo revision 66374 by Tbc (talk) Back to a standard discussion layout.

2014-04-30T19:15:45Z

Undo revision 66374 by Tbc (talk) Back to a standard discussion layout.

Tbc: add headings

2014-04-30T02:22:22Z

add headings

108.162.210.252 at 02:37, 6 April 2014

2014-04-06T02:37:11Z

Davidy22 at 21:35, 28 March 2014

2014-03-28T21:35:26Z

108.162.218.101 at 21:10, 28 March 2014

2014-03-28T21:10:37Z

Davidy22 at 00:44, 21 March 2014

2014-03-21T00:44:48Z

108.162.218.101 at 22:19, 20 March 2014

2014-03-20T22:19:38Z

@@ Line 113: / Line 113: @@
 ...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
-And after overwhelming Hairy he just turns back to his computer... Typical Black Hat. And the last panel is ''perfect'' for a profile picture.
+And after overwhelming Hairy he just turns back to his computer... Typical Black Hat. And the last panel is ''perfect'' for a profile picture. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 09:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 ;Odd things that have results

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 6 April 2018
Line 113:		Line 113:
	...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson\|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson\|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)		...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson\|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson\|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

		+	And after overwhelming Hairy he just turns back to his computer... Typical Black Hat. And the last panel is ''perfect'' for a profile picture.

	;Odd things that have results		;Odd things that have results

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ;"Random"
 Are the numbers in the speech bubble truely random (as in is there a real pattern)? Can someone check?
 --[[User:Charlesisbozo|Charlesisbozo]] ([[User talk:Charlesisbozo|talk]]) 08:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Random ==
+;"Random"
 Are the numbers in the speech bubble truely random (as in is there a real pattern)? Can someone check?
 --[[User:Charlesisbozo|Charlesisbozo]] ([[User talk:Charlesisbozo|talk]]) 08:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 Anyway, that's it.  HTH, HAND, and I'm not spending any more time on this analysis from now on.  Probably... [[Special:Contributions/178.98.253.89|178.98.253.89]] 15:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
-== I'm so Random ==
 Is it just me, or does this sound like those people at parties who drink a tiny bit, and then spend the whole party saying, "oh my Julia I'm soooo drunk right now!"
 [[Special:Contributions/99.237.74.83|99.237.74.83]] 11:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 103: / Line 104: @@
 :::How about this, without quotes: "w10: brcms_c_radio_timer: dead chip". Got this message from my netbook, which I failed to handle properly a few times in the last few years. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.252|108.162.210.252]] 02:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
-== lexical white noise ==
 Interesting, since Black Hat speaks only digits! No letters, words, diacritical marks, silly unicode characters, or Fred Flintstone outbursts. The blast of numbers seems to come out in a 2D bubble, yet speech is strictly sequential (each character can have at most two neighbors). The noise is uninteresting at best and likely unwanted, but not unnecessary (sic). It did seem to do the trick. The pesky kid was squelched, Black Hat resumed his work (or whatever).[[User:Galois|Galois]] ([[User talk:Galois|talk]]) 14:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 In fact randomness contains more information as it can't be compressed; I have no idea what Randall means by saying that in information theory randomness is uninteresting.[[User:Yehoshua2|Yehoshua2]] ([[User talk:Yehoshua2|talk]]) 17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 ...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
-=== Odd things that have results ===
 :Endothermic Zymurgy
@@ Line 114: / Line 117: @@
 :Thermobaric CheeseGrater (???) {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.101}}
-=== Is it random ===
 GOOOGLE is still prove (every law is wrong):
@@ Line 161: / Line 165: @@
 ::: Seven digit is too low. Telephone numbers may have 7 digits (up to 10 actually) and they are not random (at least not in a way Benford's law need). And multiple entries in that google search ARE related to telephone numbers. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
-== Trochees ==
 You sure "tacos" is a trochee? Seems more like a spondee to me. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 01:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 That's some stealth nerd sniping there, Randall. I sincerely did not expect to read someone suggesting that he could've encoded data in the derivative data. Even after reading 1210 comics. Also, it's been two of those in the last three comics. Damn. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.37|108.162.229.37]] 04:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-;"Random"
+== Random ==
 Are the numbers in the speech bubble truely random (as in is there a real pattern)? Can someone check?
 --[[User:Charlesisbozo|Charlesisbozo]] ([[User talk:Charlesisbozo|talk]]) 08:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 Anyway, that's it.  HTH, HAND, and I'm not spending any more time on this analysis from now on.  Probably... [[Special:Contributions/178.98.253.89|178.98.253.89]] 15:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
-;"I'm so Random"
+== I'm so Random ==
 Is it just me, or does this sound like those people at parties who drink a tiny bit, and then spend the whole party saying, "oh my Julia I'm soooo drunk right now!"
 [[Special:Contributions/99.237.74.83|99.237.74.83]] 11:13, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 103: / Line 103: @@
 :::How about this, without quotes: "w10: brcms_c_radio_timer: dead chip". Got this message from my netbook, which I failed to handle properly a few times in the last few years. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.252|108.162.210.252]] 02:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
-;"lexical white noise"
+== lexical white noise ==
 Interesting, since Black Hat speaks only digits! No letters, words, diacritical marks, silly unicode characters, or Fred Flintstone outbursts. The blast of numbers seems to come out in a 2D bubble, yet speech is strictly sequential (each character can have at most two neighbors). The noise is uninteresting at best and likely unwanted, but not unnecessary (sic). It did seem to do the trick. The pesky kid was squelched, Black Hat resumed his work (or whatever).[[User:Galois|Galois]] ([[User talk:Galois|talk]]) 14:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 In fact randomness contains more information as it can't be compressed; I have no idea what Randall means by saying that in information theory randomness is uninteresting.[[User:Yehoshua2|Yehoshua2]] ([[User talk:Yehoshua2|talk]]) 17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 ...'mean and []bullying'? I find this an appropriate response/retribution towards all those proles who think that being random is a viable source of humour. [[User:Greyson|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson|talk]]) 23:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
-;Odd things that have results
+=== Odd things that have results ===
 :Endothermic Zymurgy
@@ Line 114: / Line 114: @@
 :Thermobaric CheeseGrater (???) {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.101}}
-;Is it random
+=== Is it random ===
 GOOOGLE is still prove (every law is wrong):
@@ Line 161: / Line 161: @@
 ::: Seven digit is too low. Telephone numbers may have 7 digits (up to 10 actually) and they are not random (at least not in a way Benford's law need). And multiple entries in that google search ARE related to telephone numbers. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
-;Trochees
+== Trochees ==
 You sure "tacos" is a trochee? Seems more like a spondee to me. [[User:Stevage|Stevage]] ([[User talk:Stevage|talk]]) 01:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 That's some stealth nerd sniping there, Randall. I sincerely did not expect to read someone suggesting that he could've encoded data in the derivative data. Even after reading 1210 comics. Also, it's been two of those in the last three comics. Damn. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.37|108.162.229.37]] 04:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 ::Haha. I don't think any googlewhacks have been discovered in years. A true googlewhack must be found without quotes. ''&mdash; [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 16:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)''
 :::if you count antewhacks, then zwoddery aphasia counts {{unsigned ip|108.162.218.101}}
 ;"lexical white noise"
 Interesting, since Black Hat speaks only digits! No letters, words, diacritical marks, silly unicode characters, or Fred Flintstone outbursts. The blast of numbers seems to come out in a 2D bubble, yet speech is strictly sequential (each character can have at most two neighbors). The noise is uninteresting at best and likely unwanted, but not unnecessary (sic). It did seem to do the trick. The pesky kid was squelched, Black Hat resumed his work (or whatever).[[User:Galois|Galois]] ([[User talk:Galois|talk]]) 14:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)