Talk:1220: Hipsters - Revision history

Grass at 02:42, 22 September 2014

2014-09-22T02:42:34Z

Dgbrt at 17:34, 6 June 2013

2013-06-06T17:34:40Z

82.153.14.210 at 14:55, 6 June 2013

2013-06-06T14:55:25Z

93.41.186.46 at 09:05, 6 June 2013

2013-06-06T09:05:32Z

108.53.148.236 at 14:15, 5 June 2013

2013-06-05T14:15:25Z

220.224.246.97 at 23:19, 4 June 2013

2013-06-04T23:19:27Z

76.106.251.87 at 23:28, 3 June 2013

2013-06-03T23:28:54Z

Davidy22: Not spam. Don't touch other people's talk comments.

2013-06-03T23:27:13Z

Not spam. Don't touch other people's talk comments.

Dgbrt at 18:47, 3 June 2013

2013-06-03T18:47:21Z

Dgbrt: Undo revision 39328 by 37.160.11.143 (talk) SPAM

2013-06-03T18:14:56Z

Undo revision 39328 by 37.160.11.143 (talk) SPAM

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:42, 22 September 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:

	I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II. {{unsigned\|82.153.14.210\|14:55, 6 June 2013}}		I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II. {{unsigned\|82.153.14.210\|14:55, 6 June 2013}}
		+
		+	In uncyclopedia there were Holocaust[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Holocaust], Holocaust denial[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Holocaust_denial], Holocaust denial denial, Holocaust denial denial denial till Holocaust denial^6.--[[User:Grass\|Grass]] ([[User talk:Grass\|talk]]) 02:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
-I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg
+I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg {{unsigned|93.41.186.46|09:05, 6 June 2013}}
-I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II.
+I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II. {{unsigned|82.153.14.210|14:55, 6 June 2013}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 6 June 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg		I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg
		+
		+	I'm just going to point out that hipsters were complaining about hipsters back in the 1930's. The naval gazing metacomplaints were only temporarily halted by World War II.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 6 June 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97\|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)		If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97\|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

−	I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters.	+	I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters. http://dustinland.com/dlands/dland.hipster.jpg

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 5 June 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:

	If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97\|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)		If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97\|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think the point is that if you are aware of hipsters no matter what your feelings towards them, you are inherently part of the problem with hipsters.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 4 June 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Is Randall actually complaining/judging as opposed to observing and sharing results? Graphing of the situation can arguably exacerbate any situation by virtue of raising attention to something, but that doesn't mean those graphs are giving any opinion. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87\|76.106.251.87]] 23:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)		Is Randall actually complaining/judging as opposed to observing and sharing results? Graphing of the situation can arguably exacerbate any situation by virtue of raising attention to something, but that doesn't mean those graphs are giving any opinion. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87\|76.106.251.87]] 23:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	If you draw lines parallel to the y-axis at the x-axis intersection of the successive curves, you make an intercept with the previous curve. Since we may make a decent assumption that people of opposing camps are the ones complaining about the others, I'm compelled to say that the graph's wrong. For one thing, by definition, non-hipsters won't complain about hipsters unless other non-hipsters are doing so too...(otherwise, that itself would make them hipsters!) So the second curve wouldn't intercept the x-axis. There is no growth in the curve for complaints. They all arrive at their derision at more or less the same time, (Groupthink) and thus, the frequency's constant. There's no growth of frequency with time for the hipster opinion either! By definition, they cultivate independent opinions. The only set they can be classified into is that all of them hold different opinions from the mainstream. This should therefore also remain static at a low level. Of course, I'm assuming that the y-axis is a percentage, and has been normalised across population increases etc. Also, the fact that there are more mainstream people than hipsters ought to make the complaints about hipsters straight line lie higher than the hipster line. [[Special:Contributions/220.224.246.97\|220.224.246.97]] 23:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 3 June 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this.		This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this.
	First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w\|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w\|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w\|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)		First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w\|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w\|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w\|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is Randall actually complaining/judging as opposed to observing and sharing results? Graphing of the situation can arguably exacerbate any situation by virtue of raising attention to something, but that doesn't mean those graphs are giving any opinion. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87\|76.106.251.87]] 23:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
-== Meaning of hipster ==
+Hipster stuff is not meta enough. How about gender-fucking-fucking ?
 This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this.
 First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 3 June 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)		:We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Meaning of hipster ==
		+	This page has to explain the ambiguous meanings of the words hipster/hipsters/hipsterdom. Even web dictionaries are often wrong on this.
		+	First for "hipster" we have this subcultures {{w\|Hipster (contemporary subculture)}} and {{w\|Hipster (1940s subculture)}}. But it's also this: {{w\|Low-rise (fashion)}} witch may be refer to that tedious navel-gazing people. "Hipsterdom" is related to that subculture and according to this site [[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Hipsterdom Hipsterdom]] it is a hierarchy within the subculture of hipsters.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 18:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 3 June 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)		:We are also talking about frequency of views ("How Often I see...") rather than actual numbers of graphs or people. As time goes on, the frequency of views per unit of time... etc. --[[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
−
−	~~Hipster stuff is not meta enough. How about gender-fucking-fucking ?~~
−	~~--[[Special:Contributions/37.160.11.143\|37.160.11.143]] 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)~~