Talk:1298: Exoplanet Neighborhood - Revision history

199.216.93.232 at 21:21, 5 November 2025

2025-11-05T21:21:29Z

1234231587678 at 20:55, 19 February 2024

2024-02-19T20:55:34Z

108.162.216.88: Mr. Rogers lyric correction? http://pbskids.org/rogers/songLyricsWontYouBeMyNeighbor.html

2016-08-13T18:56:23Z

Mr. Rogers lyric correction? http://pbskids.org/rogers/songLyricsWontYouBeMyNeighbor.html

Guest at 20:18, 28 March 2014

2014-03-28T20:18:40Z

Guest: Added Comment: Graphic from "Die Zeit": Overkill-Capacity WW2

2014-03-28T20:17:29Z

Added Comment: Graphic from "Die Zeit": Overkill-Capacity WW2

Ld75 at 18:55, 23 January 2014

2014-01-23T18:55:50Z

Dgbrt at 22:17, 4 December 2013

2013-12-04T22:17:27Z

Davidy22 at 18:13, 4 December 2013

2013-12-04T18:13:27Z

173.245.53.156 at 18:01, 4 December 2013

2013-12-04T18:01:23Z

DLuebbert: Where's the joke?

2013-12-04T17:22:38Z

Where's the joke?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 5 November 2025
Line 44:		Line 44:

	Also could be Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood. Sorry for being childish.--[[User:1234231587678\|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678\|talk]]) 20:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)		Also could be Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood. Sorry for being childish.--[[User:1234231587678\|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678\|talk]]) 20:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think the emptyness around earth is because earth is the planet we live on.[[Special:Contributions/199.216.93.232\|199.216.93.232]] 21:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 19 February 2024
Line 42:		Line 42:

	It probably should be noted that the correct lyrics in "Won't You By My Neighbor?" are "It's a beautiful day in '''this''' neighborhood!" not "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood" [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.88\|108.162.216.88]] 18:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)		It probably should be noted that the correct lyrics in "Won't You By My Neighbor?" are "It's a beautiful day in '''this''' neighborhood!" not "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood" [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.88\|108.162.216.88]] 18:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Also could be Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood. Sorry for being childish.--[[User:1234231587678\|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678\|talk]]) 20:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:56, 13 August 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm		This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm
	It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war.--[[User:guest\|guest]] 20:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)		It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war.--[[User:guest\|guest]] 20:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	It probably should be noted that the correct lyrics in "Won't You By My Neighbor?" are "It's a beautiful day in '''this''' neighborhood!" not "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood" [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.88\|108.162.216.88]] 18:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 28 March 2014
Line 39:		Line 39:

	This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm		This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm
−	It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war. ([[User ~~talk~~:guest\|~~talk~~]]) 20:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)	+	It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war.--[[User:guest\|guest]] 20:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 28 March 2014
Line 37:		Line 37:

	To me, it looks like a Mitchell's Best Candidate... http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1893974 [[User:Ld75\|Ld75]] ([[User talk:Ld75\|talk]]) 18:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)		To me, it looks like a Mitchell's Best Candidate... http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1893974 [[User:Ld75\|Ld75]] ([[User talk:Ld75\|talk]]) 18:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	This remembers me on a graphic from the german newspaper "Die Zeit" 03/1995: http://schwertschlager.de/geschichte/klasse%2010/overkill.htm
		+	It's about the overkill capacity of nuclear weapons in the second world war. ([[User talk:guest\|talk]]) 20:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:55, 23 January 2014
Line 35:		Line 35:
	Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.156}}		Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.156}}
	:Randall says: "constructed from statistical data on typical planet sizes and orbits" — so this is much more a guess. Many of those planets are still not confirmed by Earth based observatories. But Randall is showing all planets in a habitable zone, that does include Gas-Planets, Earth-sized planets are just a small part on all this planets.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)		:Randall says: "constructed from statistical data on typical planet sizes and orbits" — so this is much more a guess. Many of those planets are still not confirmed by Earth based observatories. But Randall is showing all planets in a habitable zone, that does include Gas-Planets, Earth-sized planets are just a small part on all this planets.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	To me, it looks like a Mitchell's Best Candidate... http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1893974 [[User:Ld75\|Ld75]] ([[User talk:Ld75\|talk]]) 18:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 4 December 2013
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.156}}		Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.156}}
		+	:Randall says: "constructed from statistical data on typical planet sizes and orbits" — so this is much more a guess. Many of those planets are still not confirmed by Earth based observatories. But Randall is showing all planets in a habitable zone, that does include Gas-Planets, Earth-sized planets are just a small part on all this planets.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 4 December 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	: Presumably because it's available as a poster. [[User:Wwoods\|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods\|talk]]) 17:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)		: Presumably because it's available as a poster. [[User:Wwoods\|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods\|talk]]) 17:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

−	Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets?	+	Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets? {{unsigned ip\|173.245.53.156}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 4 December 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:
	Has anyone noticed the different typography? Any Idea why it’s set in Futura and not in his own handwriting? [[User:Quoti\|Quoti]] ([[User talk:Quoti\|talk]]) 10:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)		Has anyone noticed the different typography? Any Idea why it’s set in Futura and not in his own handwriting? [[User:Quoti\|Quoti]] ([[User talk:Quoti\|talk]]) 10:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
	: Presumably because it's available as a poster. [[User:Wwoods\|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods\|talk]]) 17:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)		: Presumably because it's available as a poster. [[User:Wwoods\|Wwoods]] ([[User talk:Wwoods\|talk]]) 17:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Are the planets in proportion to one another or not? Because some of them seem pretty large. Could those be gaseous planets?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 4 December 2013
Line 23:		Line 23:

	I agree there is not always any joke, but generally there seems to be either a joke, or puzzle, or riddle, or pun, or mind-bending non sequitur ... something beyond the simple information here recognized so far. Would not be the first time I have overthought an issue (maybe not first time today!), but I sense there's more here. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 15:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)		I agree there is not always any joke, but generally there seems to be either a joke, or puzzle, or riddle, or pun, or mind-bending non sequitur ... something beyond the simple information here recognized so far. Would not be the first time I have overthought an issue (maybe not first time today!), but I sense there's more here. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 15:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	The joke resides in the hover text for this panel. The "Mister Rogers Neighborhood" reference satisfies me comedically.
		+
		+	Pretty cool, a comic that uses a web browser's presentation timing for its wise cracks. [[User:DLuebbert\|DLuebbert]] ([[User talk:DLuebbert\|talk]]) 17:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

	[The potty 1] I'm deeply suspicious of this infographic. For a start the resemblance to a color blindness test is obvious. Second the circle around earth must have some meaning. If it was what he says it is he would probably have labelled at least the larger planets? {{unsigned\|The Potty 1}}		[The potty 1] I'm deeply suspicious of this infographic. For a start the resemblance to a color blindness test is obvious. Second the circle around earth must have some meaning. If it was what he says it is he would probably have labelled at least the larger planets? {{unsigned\|The Potty 1}}