Talk:1309: Infinite Scrolling - Revision history

Dgbrt: Undo revision 165435 by 162.158.78.10 (talk) Vandalism

2018-11-05T20:59:14Z

Undo revision 165435 by 162.158.78.10 (talk) Vandalism

162.158.78.10: i liked it

2018-11-04T03:48:21Z

i liked it

Hkmaly at 10:38, 30 December 2013

2013-12-30T10:38:41Z

Davidy22 at 10:52, 29 December 2013

2013-12-29T10:52:53Z

ExternalMonolog at 10:25, 29 December 2013

2013-12-29T10:25:26Z

JakubNarebski: infinite scrolling done right

2013-12-28T21:19:30Z

infinite scrolling done right

173.245.54.86 at 18:54, 27 December 2013

2013-12-27T18:54:11Z

Kaa-ching at 12:45, 27 December 2013

2013-12-27T12:45:52Z

Hkmaly at 10:50, 27 December 2013

2013-12-27T10:50:36Z

Hkmaly: Created page with "I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. -- ~~~~"

2013-12-27T10:48:33Z

Created page with "I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. -- ~~~~"

New page

I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 5 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~neat comic!!~~	+	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Using location.hash should work on most browsers. However, coding it in is intimately connected to something called "work", which is probably the reason it generally isn't implemented. Also, reloading e.g. a soup that's been scrolled down two miles would take forever. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Also [http://caniuse.com/#search=pushState pushState] should work in all browsers, but it doesn't. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	: Soup.io and Tumblr, too. Understandably. I find paginated Tumblr much more annoying than infinite scrolling. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	As an elderly (late 60s) reader and contributor, this has touched a very sensitive nerve in me. As I learned to read I began to learn to LEARN, Then I learned to read books. As I learned to read I found that I had ten book-marks, ten fingers, that kept me connected to at least ten previous sections of the work. I could refer back and forth between new text and old and I could build up an ever-changing but overall context of what was being discussed . In the literary sense. I could range, fore and aft, from chapter 1 to chapter last.. I could read text that stirred me, over and over, to see what, in context, the story, was trying to teach me. The FORMAT of information is CLOSELY aligned to what INFORMATION it imparts and just as closely related to what it INTENDS to impart. I really miss the days of SLOW, CAREFUL, induction of information. Syllable by syllable. Verb by verb. Element by element in the the pure joy of reading. {{unsigned\|ExternalMonolog}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 4 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)	+	neat comic!!
−	:Using location.hash should work on most browsers. However, coding it in is intimately connected to something called "work", which is probably the reason it generally isn't implemented. Also, reloading e.g. a soup that's been scrolled down two miles would take forever. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
−
−	~~::Also [http://caniuse.com/#search=pushState pushState] should work in all browsers, but it doesn't. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)~~
−
−	Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
−	~~: Soup.io and Tumblr, too. Understandably. I find paginated Tumblr much more annoying than infinite scrolling. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)~~
−
−	There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
−
−	As an elderly (late 60s) reader and contributor, this has touched a very sensitive nerve in me. As I learned to read I began to learn to LEARN, Then I learned to read books. As I learned to read I found that I had ten book-marks, ten fingers, that kept me connected to at least ten previous sections of the work. I could refer back and forth between new text and old and I could build up an ever-changing but overall context of what was being discussed . In the literary sense. I could range, fore and aft, from chapter 1 to chapter last.. I could read text that stirred me, over and over, to see what, in context, the story, was trying to teach me. The FORMAT of information is CLOSELY aligned to what INFORMATION it imparts and just as closely related to what it INTENDS to impart. I really miss the days of SLOW, CAREFUL, induction of information. Syllable by syllable. Verb by verb. Element by element in the the pure joy of reading. {{unsigned\|ExternalMonolog}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 :Using location.hash should work on most browsers. However, coding it in is intimately connected to something called "work", which is probably the reason it generally isn't implemented. Also, reloading e.g. a soup that's been scrolled down two miles would take forever. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 29 December 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)		There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

−	As an elderly (late 60s) reader and contributor, this has touched a very sensitive nerve in me. As I learned to read I began to learn to LEARN, Then I learned to read books. As I learned to read I found that I had ten book-marks, ten fingers, that kept me connected to at least ten previous sections of the work. I could refer back and forth between new text and old and I could build up an ever-changing but overall context of what was being discussed . In the literary sense. I could range, fore and aft, from chapter 1 to chapter last.. I could read text that stirred me, over and over, to see what, in context, the story, was trying to teach me. The FORMAT of information is CLOSELY aligned to what INFORMATION it imparts and just as closely related to what it INTENDS to impart. I really miss the days of SLOW, CAREFUL, induction of information. Syllable by syllable. Verb by verb. Element by element in the the pure joy of reading.	+	As an elderly (late 60s) reader and contributor, this has touched a very sensitive nerve in me. As I learned to read I began to learn to LEARN, Then I learned to read books. As I learned to read I found that I had ten book-marks, ten fingers, that kept me connected to at least ten previous sections of the work. I could refer back and forth between new text and old and I could build up an ever-changing but overall context of what was being discussed . In the literary sense. I could range, fore and aft, from chapter 1 to chapter last.. I could read text that stirred me, over and over, to see what, in context, the story, was trying to teach me. The FORMAT of information is CLOSELY aligned to what INFORMATION it imparts and just as closely related to what it INTENDS to impart. I really miss the days of SLOW, CAREFUL, induction of information. Syllable by syllable. Verb by verb. Element by element in the the pure joy of reading. {{unsigned\|ExternalMonolog}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 29 December 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)		There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	As an elderly (late 60s) reader and contributor, this has touched a very sensitive nerve in me. As I learned to read I began to learn to LEARN, Then I learned to read books. As I learned to read I found that I had ten book-marks, ten fingers, that kept me connected to at least ten previous sections of the work. I could refer back and forth between new text and old and I could build up an ever-changing but overall context of what was being discussed . In the literary sense. I could range, fore and aft, from chapter 1 to chapter last.. I could read text that stirred me, over and over, to see what, in context, the story, was trying to teach me. The FORMAT of information is CLOSELY aligned to what INFORMATION it imparts and just as closely related to what it INTENDS to impart. I really miss the days of SLOW, CAREFUL, induction of information. Syllable by syllable. Verb by verb. Element by element in the the pure joy of reading.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 28 December 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
	: Soup.io and Tumblr, too. Understandably. I find paginated Tumblr much more annoying than infinite scrolling. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		: Soup.io and Tumblr, too. Understandably. I find paginated Tumblr much more annoying than infinite scrolling. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	There are a few sites and tools that try to implement infinite scrolling without breaking back button, [http://eviltrout.com/2013/02/16/infinite-scrolling-that-works.html for example Discourse] --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 27 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Using location.hash should work on most browsers. However, coding it in is intimately connected to something called "work", which is probably the reason it generally isn't implemented. Also, reloading e.g. a soup that's been scrolled down two miles would take forever. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

	Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	: Soup.io and Tumblr, too. Understandably. I find paginated Tumblr much more annoying than infinite scrolling. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.86\|173.245.54.86]] 18:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 27 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Shouldn't we add a few examples of websites that currently exhibit this behavior? Facebook and Twitter come to mind... [[User:Kaa-ching\|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching\|talk]]) 12:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 27 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)	+	I think the title text is supposed to be sarcasm. Note that it IS possible to keep track of section of javascript-generated pages, but it's harder and I'm not sure if there is cross-browser way to make back button work with them, it's possible you need different code for every browser. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)