Talk:1311: 2014 - Revision history

Sci09273.15 at 18:26, 28 September 2022

2022-09-28T18:26:17Z

141.101.104.110 at 11:22, 23 December 2021

2021-12-23T11:22:25Z

172.68.174.10 at 20:12, 21 December 2017

2017-12-21T20:12:21Z

188.114.102.243 at 17:12, 17 July 2015

2015-07-17T17:12:00Z

108.162.219.125: typo

2015-02-10T02:58:18Z

typo

Hkmaly at 10:29, 25 April 2014

2014-04-25T10:29:58Z

Brion: Minor edit

2014-03-13T17:08:17Z

Minor edit

Davidy22 at 17:45, 3 March 2014

2014-03-03T17:45:04Z

173.245.54.87: comment

2014-03-03T16:18:49Z

comment

108.162.215.56 at 15:31, 9 February 2014

2014-02-09T15:31:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 28 September 2022
Line 109:		Line 109:
	I was curious about what was meant by "petting parties", and I found this article: http://www.npr.org/sections/npr-history-dept/2015/05/26/409126557/when-petting-parties-scandalized-the-nation		I was curious about what was meant by "petting parties", and I found this article: http://www.npr.org/sections/npr-history-dept/2015/05/26/409126557/when-petting-parties-scandalized-the-nation
	It seems to me that what the original quote meant by petting party, is now totally a thing of the past :-) --[[Special:Contributions/188.114.102.243\|188.114.102.243]] 17:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)		It seems to me that what the original quote meant by petting party, is now totally a thing of the past :-) --[[Special:Contributions/188.114.102.243\|188.114.102.243]] 17:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I often think what interesting history we are making for the student of the twenty-second century. [[User:Sci09273.15\|Sci09273.15]] ([[User talk:Sci09273.15\|talk]]) 18:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 It should be noted that this quote was wrong about making love being a sanctuary from electric devices. {{unsigned ip|108.162.216.78}}
 ----
 Regarding languages spoken: according to

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 :Could be a typo in the quoted Oriental Herald article.  The book referenced above spells it "Shakespeare". [[User:Brion|Brion]] ([[User talk:Brion|talk]]) 17:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 English is not my native language, but surely "barrieres" is a typo, right? I'll edit it. If I'm wrong, please revert it. And, if this comment is absolutely unnecessary, please delete it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.125|108.162.219.125]] 02:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 17 July 2015
Line 100:		Line 100:

	English is not my native language, but surely "barrieres" is a typo, right? I'll edit it. If I'm wrong, please revert it. And, if this comment is absolutely unnecessary, please delete it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.125\|108.162.219.125]] 02:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)		English is not my native language, but surely "barrieres" is a typo, right? I'll edit it. If I'm wrong, please revert it. And, if this comment is absolutely unnecessary, please delete it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.125\|108.162.219.125]] 02:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	----
		+	I was curious about what was meant by "petting parties", and I found this article: http://www.npr.org/sections/npr-history-dept/2015/05/26/409126557/when-petting-parties-scandalized-the-nation
		+	It seems to me that what the original quote meant by petting party, is now totally a thing of the past :-) --[[Special:Contributions/188.114.102.243\|188.114.102.243]] 17:12, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 10 February 2015
Line 98:		Line 98:
	If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56\|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)		If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56\|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
	:Could be a typo in the quoted Oriental Herald article. The book referenced above spells it "Shakespeare". [[User:Brion\|Brion]] ([[User talk:Brion\|talk]]) 17:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)		:Could be a typo in the quoted Oriental Herald article. The book referenced above spells it "Shakespeare". [[User:Brion\|Brion]] ([[User talk:Brion\|talk]]) 17:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	English is not my native language, but surely "barrieres" is a typo, right? I'll edit it. If I'm wrong, please revert it. And, if this comment is absolutely unnecessary, please delete it. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.125\|108.162.219.125]] 02:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:29, 25 April 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:

	::Actually, no. Google Books is trying to make printed books accessible on-line. That does not make them more preserved, just more accessible. Paper books (provided they're printed on acid-free paper) are actually more likely to be preserved and readable two centuries from now than are electronic media, which must be periodically refreshed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.87}}		::Actually, no. Google Books is trying to make printed books accessible on-line. That does not make them more preserved, just more accessible. Paper books (provided they're printed on acid-free paper) are actually more likely to be preserved and readable two centuries from now than are electronic media, which must be periodically refreshed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.87}}
		+
		+	:::Both paper books and electronic media must be periodically refreshed. Electronic media must be refreshed more often, but on the other hand, they may be refreshed more quickly. Compare time it takes to reprint book (even if you use scanner, OCR and high-speed printer) with time it takes to copy the PDF from older HDD to newer. If we manage to evade World War III, it is easily possible the folder "all data obtained in 2014" will still exist in Google datacenters, safely mirrored to all locations, thousands years after all paper printed today will turn to dust. Archaeologist of 40th century wouldn't dig real dirt, they would dig in exabytes of digital archives, trying to find the real important stuff between stuff someone stored simply because storage capacity was cheap enough. (On the other hand, if we DON'T evade World War III, there wouldn't be any archaeologists in 40th century. It's not like the ruins would be safe to enter anyway.) -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

	Found the reference to Shakespearian rope bridges...		Found the reference to Shakespearian rope bridges...

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 13 March 2014
Line 95:		Line 95:
	----		----
	If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56\|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)		If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56\|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
		+	:Could be a typo in the quoted Oriental Herald article. The book referenced above spells it "Shakespeare". [[User:Brion\|Brion]] ([[User talk:Brion\|talk]]) 17:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 :Christopher Baldwin: [http://books.google.cz/books?id=Fiu4czMiCeYC] ... I would say good luck with preserving everything printed :-), but the idea is certainly good and projects like Google Books are attempting to solve the problem he was talking about. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
-::Actually, no.  Google Books is trying to make printed books accessible on-line.  That does not make them more preserved, just more accessible.  Paper books (provided they're printed on acid-free paper) are actually more likely to be preserved and readable two centuries from now than are electronic media, which must be periodically refreshed.
+::Actually, no. Google Books is trying to make printed books accessible on-line. That does not make them more preserved, just more accessible. Paper books (provided they're printed on acid-free paper) are actually more likely to be preserved and readable two centuries from now than are electronic media, which must be periodically refreshed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.87}}
 Found the reference to Shakespearian rope bridges...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 3 March 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Christopher Baldwin: [http://books.google.cz/books?id=Fiu4czMiCeYC] ... I would say good luck with preserving everything printed :-), but the idea is certainly good and projects like Google Books are attempting to solve the problem he was talking about. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 12:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)		:Christopher Baldwin: [http://books.google.cz/books?id=Fiu4czMiCeYC] ... I would say good luck with preserving everything printed :-), but the idea is certainly good and projects like Google Books are attempting to solve the problem he was talking about. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 12:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Actually, no. Google Books is trying to make printed books accessible on-line. That does not make them more preserved, just more accessible. Paper books (provided they're printed on acid-free paper) are actually more likely to be preserved and readable two centuries from now than are electronic media, which must be periodically refreshed.

	Found the reference to Shakespearian rope bridges...		Found the reference to Shakespearian rope bridges...

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 9 February 2014
Line 90:		Line 90:
	----		----
	I think the quote about colleges, football, and partying is included as an aversion. Football is still huge in the south, and partying everywhere. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.60\|173.245.50.60]] 16:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC) (P.S. Apparently this comment got eaten by ??? so I had to post it twice. Weird.)		I think the quote about colleges, football, and partying is included as an aversion. Football is still huge in the south, and partying everywhere. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.60\|173.245.50.60]] 16:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC) (P.S. Apparently this comment got eaten by ??? so I had to post it twice. Weird.)
		+
		+	----
		+	If not a typo, is it worth mentioning that the guy in the title text is called "Shakespear" not "Shakespeare" but all you modern guys apparently ignored the difference? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.56\|108.162.215.56]] 15:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)