Talk:1372: Smartwatches - Revision history

172.68.62.107: thoughts about connection to #1988: containers

2023-10-18T09:40:55Z

thoughts about connection to #1988: containers

172.69.79.133: Undo revision 298244 by 172.70.115.29 (talk) Not worth dignifying it as a comment.

2022-11-05T22:15:53Z

Undo revision 298244 by 172.70.115.29 (talk) Not worth dignifying it as a comment.

172.70.115.29 at 19:52, 5 November 2022

2022-11-05T19:52:38Z

172.70.223.92 at 21:24, 4 October 2022

2022-10-04T21:24:00Z

173.245.56.180 at 19:12, 5 June 2015

2015-06-05T19:12:01Z

173.245.55.29 at 18:39, 29 November 2014

2014-11-29T18:39:58Z

173.245.54.13 at 19:02, 11 June 2014

2014-06-11T19:02:23Z

Davidy22 at 20:29, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T20:29:00Z

Faboofour at 19:06, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T19:06:37Z

Dulcis at 16:46, 29 May 2014

2014-05-29T16:46:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 18 October 2023
Line 38:		Line 38:

	I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)		I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	So... You make a smartphone out of 2 smart watches, make a tablet out of 2 smartphones in "Containers" (#1988)... Next up, two tables to make a full sized computer screen? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.62.107\|172.68.62.107]] 09:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 5 November 2022
Line 38:		Line 38:

	I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)		I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
−
−	~~You are all fucking clowns. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.115.29\|172.70.115.29]] 19:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 5 November 2022
Line 38:		Line 38:

	I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)		I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	You are all fucking clowns. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.115.29\|172.70.115.29]] 19:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 4 October 2022
Line 36:		Line 36:

	This would be awesome (if it was done better), because it would be smaller than a normal phone, and the screen would be protected.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.180\|173.245.56.180]] 19:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)		This would be awesome (if it was done better), because it would be smaller than a normal phone, and the screen would be protected.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.180\|173.245.56.180]] 19:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I came here specifically to see if anyone had made one (as with Hell Tetris)... disappointed. :-( [[Special:Contributions/172.70.223.92\|172.70.223.92]] 21:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 5 June 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The warnings at the end are entirely irrelevant! first of all, nowhere does it say (or show) that randall is in fact cutting through the glass or the battery of the iphone, and were i do this project, i would certainly use a hacksaw to cut through the case of the iphone after removing the screen and battery and any other components. using a household hinge in place of a more elegant design hilights the hilarity and DIY nature of the project. as far as the comment above regarding the apparent 'broken clock', the illustration is merely a proposal on a possible methodology. when i draw a diagram or even a set of instructions for someone, i don't take the time to change minute details from frame to frame![[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.29\|173.245.55.29]] 18:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)		The warnings at the end are entirely irrelevant! first of all, nowhere does it say (or show) that randall is in fact cutting through the glass or the battery of the iphone, and were i do this project, i would certainly use a hacksaw to cut through the case of the iphone after removing the screen and battery and any other components. using a household hinge in place of a more elegant design hilights the hilarity and DIY nature of the project. as far as the comment above regarding the apparent 'broken clock', the illustration is merely a proposal on a possible methodology. when i draw a diagram or even a set of instructions for someone, i don't take the time to change minute details from frame to frame![[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.29\|173.245.55.29]] 18:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
		+	:Also, there is no way that you could be electrocuted by cutting a phone in half because:
		+	1: the battery is not powerful enough (i think)
		+	2: the electricity would go through the saw, not your hand
		+	3: the saw probably has a plastic/wood/rubber handle, and none of those conduct electricity.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.180\|173.245.56.180]] 19:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	This would be awesome (if it was done better), because it would be smaller than a normal phone, and the screen would be protected.[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.180\|173.245.56.180]] 19:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 29 November 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:

	The warning mentions that sawing through your phone could be harmful due to battery acid, but what about screwing on hinges? That could be just as dangerous. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.13\|173.245.54.13]] 19:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)justsayin		The warning mentions that sawing through your phone could be harmful due to battery acid, but what about screwing on hinges? That could be just as dangerous. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.13\|173.245.54.13]] 19:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)justsayin
		+
		+	The warnings at the end are entirely irrelevant! first of all, nowhere does it say (or show) that randall is in fact cutting through the glass or the battery of the iphone, and were i do this project, i would certainly use a hacksaw to cut through the case of the iphone after removing the screen and battery and any other components. using a household hinge in place of a more elegant design hilights the hilarity and DIY nature of the project. as far as the comment above regarding the apparent 'broken clock', the illustration is merely a proposal on a possible methodology. when i draw a diagram or even a set of instructions for someone, i don't take the time to change minute details from frame to frame![[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.29\|173.245.55.29]] 18:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 11 June 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	No mention of the cringe factor? The entire operation, from the second frame to the title text suggests crude handling of equipment, resulting in damaged and unrefined products. Rendall spared no time in detailing the broken and damaged aspect of each component used in this "procedure". I strongly believe he did so on purpose.[[User:Dulcis\|Dulcis]] ([[User talk:Dulcis\|talk]]) 16:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)		No mention of the cringe factor? The entire operation, from the second frame to the title text suggests crude handling of equipment, resulting in damaged and unrefined products. Rendall spared no time in detailing the broken and damaged aspect of each component used in this "procedure". I strongly believe he did so on purpose.[[User:Dulcis\|Dulcis]] ([[User talk:Dulcis\|talk]]) 16:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	The warning mentions that sawing through your phone could be harmful due to battery acid, but what about screwing on hinges? That could be just as dangerous. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.13\|173.245.54.13]] 19:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)justsayin

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Maybe it's just me, but the explanation regarding the */# keys on Bell phone seems irrelevent.  There's nothing inherent about those keys that make a comparison to cellular phones logical, at least not that I'm aware of.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.61|108.162.216.61]] 16:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 :It's especially irrelevant because Randall says he modded a handset, not an entire phone. There exist novelty bluetooth handsets of a similar style on the market; Randall's artistic touch is to have a cord dangling from it with a frayed end.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.83|108.162.218.83]] 02:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
-::To make it clearer: the standard handset on a WE2500 (12 key touch-tone), the WE1500 (10 key touch-tone; they didn't make a lot of these, but they're out there) and the WE500 (dial with the numbers outside around the dial) was  a G1 handset.  This handset replaced the F1, standard on the WE302 (dial with the numbers inside the finger-holes; commonly called the "Lucy" phone since the only place it's seen these days is on "I Love Lucy" re-runs).  The G1 handset is still (imho) the most comfortable handset ever made to cradle between your shoulder and your ear to free up your hands.  And the WE500 is (again imho) one of the greatest examples of industrial design ever created.
+::To make it clearer: the standard handset on a WE2500 (12 key touch-tone), the WE1500 (10 key touch-tone; they didn't make a lot of these, but they're out there) and the WE500 (dial with the numbers outside around the dial) was  a G1 handset.  This handset replaced the F1, standard on the WE302 (dial with the numbers inside the finger-holes; commonly called the "Lucy" phone since the only place it's seen these days is on "I Love Lucy" re-runs).  The G1 handset is still (imho) the most comfortable handset ever made to cradle between your shoulder and your ear to free up your hands.  And the WE500 is (again imho) one of the greatest examples of industrial design ever created. {{unsigned|Faboofour}}
 I question the assumption that the smartwatches are working.  The watch keeps displaying the time of 10:13.  Even if it had just turned 10:13 I don't think the entire mod could be done in sub 60 seconds.  That said, I love the reuse of the sawn screen protector to protect the screen on the smartwatches.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 29 May 2014
Line 24:		Line 24:


−	No mention of the cringe factor? The entire operation, from the second frame to the title text suggests crude handling of equipment, resulting in damaged and unrefined products. Rendall spared no time in detailing the broken and damaged aspect of each component used in this "procedure". I strongly believe he did so on purpose.	+	No mention of the cringe factor? The entire operation, from the second frame to the title text suggests crude handling of equipment, resulting in damaged and unrefined products. Rendall spared no time in detailing the broken and damaged aspect of each component used in this "procedure". I strongly believe he did so on purpose.[[User:Dulcis\|Dulcis]] ([[User talk:Dulcis\|talk]]) 16:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)