Talk:1426: Reduce Your Payments - Revision history

172.68.138.208 at 11:37, 26 October 2023

2023-10-26T11:37:49Z

Kynde: layout

2016-06-16T08:16:30Z

layout

Kynde: layout

2016-06-16T08:16:02Z

layout

Davidy22: Friggin genius

2014-12-28T02:53:07Z

Friggin genius

173.245.50.73 at 18:05, 27 December 2014

2014-12-27T18:05:27Z

108.162.217.191: answered NerillDP's question

2014-10-18T23:15:41Z

answered NerillDP's question

Davidy22 at 01:59, 3 October 2014

2014-10-03T01:59:27Z

173.245.52.194: Response to paper bleaching question

2014-10-03T01:56:57Z

Response to paper bleaching question

NerillDP at 00:25, 30 September 2014

2014-09-30T00:25:44Z

NerillDP: Payment or Bill

2014-09-30T00:18:52Z

Payment or Bill

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 :Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
-::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment[[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
+::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
-:Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.
+:Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 ::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment[[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
-Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.
+:Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.
 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 ::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment[[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.
 ::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment[[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 27 December 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)		Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
−	Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191\|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)	+	Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.
		+	::See the negotiable cow/getting HM Revenue and Customs to accept it as payment[[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73\|173.245.50.73]] 18:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191\|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 18 October 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)		Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
		+	Not necessarily. The payment appears to take the form of a paper check, checks are usually issued by a bank(1), and the paper on which they're printed is controlled by the company contracted to produce the checks (not necessarily the bank, but saying "your bank uses some really weird paper [for printing your checks]" is a reasonable thing to say). (1) To be super-pedantic, you can technically write a valid check on pretty much anything that will accept permanent writing, but getting a bank to accept it might be a little tricky.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.217.191\|108.162.217.191]] 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means?  What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
-Generally for reductive bleaching for improved brightness in the pulp and paper industry.  Often used but not as a rule after a peroxide (oxidative) bleaching step to get several more ISO points of brightness by reducing chromophores.  Datasheet from one manufacturer: http://www.montchem.com/MontBrite1240.pdf
+Generally for reductive bleaching for improved brightness in the pulp and paper industry.  Often used but not as a rule after a peroxide (oxidative) bleaching step to get several more ISO points of brightness by reducing chromophores.  Datasheet from one manufacturer: http://www.montchem.com/MontBrite1240.pdf {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.194}}
 Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 3 October 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)		Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Generally for reductive bleaching for improved brightness in the pulp and paper industry. Often used but not as a rule after a peroxide (oxidative) bleaching step to get several more ISO points of brightness by reducing chromophores. Datasheet from one manufacturer: http://www.montchem.com/MontBrite1240.pdf

	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)		Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 30 September 2014
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)		Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

−	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]]	+	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]] ([[User talk:NerillDP\|talk]]) 00:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 30 September 2014
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)		Can someone explain more explicitly what "improve the resulting paper's properties" means? What properties are changed and how does that change represent an improvement (sturdier, whiter, easier to fold, easier to get ink to bind to it, etc.)? [[User:Djbrasier\|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier\|talk]]) 20:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Wouldn't Mr. Pedantic suggest Black Hat's question to be "... REDUCING YOUR MORTGAGE BILL."? Would've made more sense to him given Black Hat's explanation. [[User:NerillDP\|NerillDP]]