Talk:1443: Language Nerd - Revision history

CalibansCreations at 09:38, 13 January 2025

2025-01-13T09:38:36Z

172.70.91.78 at 00:18, 14 December 2022

2022-12-14T00:18:52Z

ColorfulGalaxy at 10:04, 13 December 2022

2022-12-13T10:04:40Z

Dgbrt: Please sign your comments.

2018-09-11T21:11:36Z

Please sign your comments.

172.69.198.28: /* example of an autogram? */ new section

2018-09-11T15:50:54Z

‎example of an autogram?: new section

188.114.99.189: rewording. sorry for the rapid fire edits

2015-12-01T00:02:39Z

rewording. sorry for the rapid fire edits

188.114.99.189: typo

2015-12-01T00:01:48Z

typo

188.114.99.189 at 00:01, 1 December 2015

2015-12-01T00:01:27Z

141.101.98.236: Questioning the explanation which may not be accurate.

2014-12-03T22:55:56Z

Questioning the explanation which may not be accurate.

108.162.216.62: Anachronism question

2014-11-08T03:46:26Z

Anachronism question

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogram
-I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense {{unsigned ip|172.69.198.28}}
+I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense {{unsigned ip|172.69.198.28|15:50, 11 September 2018}}
 Related: [http://google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&form=QBLHCN&sp=-1&pq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&sc=0-51&qs=n&sk=&cvid=3DDF204C36474D6DB99C4F858F88CEE0&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= Click here] --[[User:ColorfulGalaxy|ColorfulGalaxy]] ([[User talk:ColorfulGalaxy|talk]]) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 :Could you provide a less awful-looking link to follow without requiring either Google-parsing or a manual demunging of whatever it is the link is supposed to lead to? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.78|172.70.91.78]] 00:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 14 December 2022
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Related: [http://google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&form=QBLHCN&sp=-1&pq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&sc=0-51&qs=n&sk=&cvid=3DDF204C36474D6DB99C4F858F88CEE0&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= Click here] --[[User:ColorfulGalaxy\|ColorfulGalaxy]] ([[User talk:ColorfulGalaxy\|talk]]) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)		Related: [http://google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&form=QBLHCN&sp=-1&pq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&sc=0-51&qs=n&sk=&cvid=3DDF204C36474D6DB99C4F858F88CEE0&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= Click here] --[[User:ColorfulGalaxy\|ColorfulGalaxy]] ([[User talk:ColorfulGalaxy\|talk]]) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
		+	:Could you provide a less awful-looking link to follow without requiring either Google-parsing or a manual demunging of whatever it is the link is supposed to lead to? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.78\|172.70.91.78]] 00:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 13 December 2022
Line 33:		Line 33:
	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogram		https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogram
	I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense {{unsigned ip\|172.69.198.28}}		I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense {{unsigned ip\|172.69.198.28}}
		+
		+	Related: [http://google.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&form=QBLHCN&sp=-1&pq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mathisfunforum.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fid%3D1689&sc=0-51&qs=n&sk=&cvid=3DDF204C36474D6DB99C4F858F88CEE0&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= Click here] --[[User:ColorfulGalaxy\|ColorfulGalaxy]] ([[User talk:ColorfulGalaxy\|talk]]) 10:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 "Megan uses the word adverbed without any comment" <- this is wrong because she says "I just verbed adverb"  [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.236|141.101.98.236]] 22:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
-== example of an autogram? ==
+'''example of an autogram?'''
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogram
-I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense
+I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense {{unsigned ip|172.69.198.28}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 11 September 2018
Line 28:		Line 28:

	"Megan uses the word adverbed without any comment" <- this is wrong because she says "I just verbed adverb" [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.236\|141.101.98.236]] 22:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)		"Megan uses the word adverbed without any comment" <- this is wrong because she says "I just verbed adverb" [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.236\|141.101.98.236]] 22:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	== example of an autogram? ==
		+
		+	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogram
		+	I would say so, except in the "parts of speech" sense

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62|108.162.216.62]] 03:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
-:It's almost the rule. Nonetheless, you raise an iteresting point. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.99.189|188.114.99.189]] 00:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
+:Seems to be the rule here. Nonetheless, you raise an iteresting point. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.99.189|188.114.99.189]] 00:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 "Megan uses the word adverbed without any comment" <- this is wrong because she says "I just verbed adverb"  [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.236|141.101.98.236]] 22:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 3 December 2014
Line 24:		Line 24:
	I don't mean to go all anchronic nazi on XKCD, but when Megan says "I just", The meaning of the word 'just' in this sentence is "very recently; in the immediate past." However at the point of saying the word 'just', she actually hasn't yet done the thing which she is about to describe., hence it would be more correct to say "I am legit adverbing 'legit', I just verbed adverb, etc..". Unless a sentence is like a database transaction and the period at the end is the COMMIT statement, in which case you can only evaluate the sentence once you reach the end. Is it possible to overthink things in XKCD?		I don't mean to go all anchronic nazi on XKCD, but when Megan says "I just", The meaning of the word 'just' in this sentence is "very recently; in the immediate past." However at the point of saying the word 'just', she actually hasn't yet done the thing which she is about to describe., hence it would be more correct to say "I am legit adverbing 'legit', I just verbed adverb, etc..". Unless a sentence is like a database transaction and the period at the end is the COMMIT statement, in which case you can only evaluate the sentence once you reach the end. Is it possible to overthink things in XKCD?
	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62\|108.162.216.62]] 03:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62\|108.162.216.62]] 03:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	"Megan uses the word adverbed without any comment" <- this is wrong because she says "I just verbed adverb" [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.236\|141.101.98.236]] 22:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 8 November 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Megan didn't verb "verb". As with the comments pointing to the Calvin and Hobbes strip, "verbing" is already a thing. [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 07:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)		Megan didn't verb "verb". As with the comments pointing to the Calvin and Hobbes strip, "verbing" is already a thing. [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 07:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	I don't mean to go all anchronic nazi on XKCD, but when Megan says "I just", The meaning of the word 'just' in this sentence is "very recently; in the immediate past." However at the point of saying the word 'just', she actually hasn't yet done the thing which she is about to describe., hence it would be more correct to say "I am legit adverbing 'legit', I just verbed adverb, etc..". Unless a sentence is like a database transaction and the period at the end is the COMMIT statement, in which case you can only evaluate the sentence once you reach the end. Is it possible to overthink things in XKCD?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62\|108.162.216.62]] 03:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)