Talk:1476: Ceres - Revision history

42.book.addict at 02:12, 10 January 2025

2025-01-10T02:12:50Z

Metalpotato: faculae

2017-01-05T15:40:34Z

faculae

Shine at 00:03, 23 January 2015

2015-01-23T00:03:17Z

Drcrazy102: Just my idea

2015-01-23T00:00:56Z

Just my idea

108.162.249.205 at 22:33, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T22:33:48Z

Davidy22 at 16:36, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T16:36:39Z

173.245.50.73 at 15:11, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T15:11:33Z

141.101.106.131 at 12:17, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T12:17:47Z

108.162.217.125 at 05:47, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T05:47:31Z

Davidy22 at 00:14, 22 January 2015

2015-01-22T00:14:07Z

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 :That's what I thought of when I say it and it is a pop culture reference that Randall would surely know, I hope. However, saying that I agree with the Pennpenn and other replies about trying too hard to find a link between subject matter and outside sources. Every time I went into English, people were always trying to find these obscure references and ideas which I'm sure the author/s never intended. -Drcrazy102--[[User:Drcrazy102|Drcrazy102]] ([[User talk:Drcrazy102|talk]]) 00:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
-::unrelated
+;unrelated
 What if...temperature did cause deflategate. If the footballs started at 12.5 psi at 72 degrees F...I get negative 13 degrees F to bring pressure down to 10.5 psi. Using ideal gas law. Amiright? [[User:Shine|Shine]] ([[User talk:Shine|talk]]) 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 Looks like we know more about Ceres since Dawn actually got there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bright_spots_on_Ceres[[User:Metalpotato|Metalpotato]] ([[User talk:Metalpotato|talk]]) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 5 January 2017
Line 41:		Line 41:
	::unrelated		::unrelated
	What if...temperature did cause deflategate. If the footballs started at 12.5 psi at 72 degrees F...I get negative 13 degrees F to bring pressure down to 10.5 psi. Using ideal gas law. Amiright? [[User:Shine\|Shine]] ([[User talk:Shine\|talk]]) 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)		What if...temperature did cause deflategate. If the footballs started at 12.5 psi at 72 degrees F...I get negative 13 degrees F to bring pressure down to 10.5 psi. Using ideal gas law. Amiright? [[User:Shine\|Shine]] ([[User talk:Shine\|talk]]) 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Looks like we know more about Ceres since Dawn actually got there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bright_spots_on_Ceres[[User:Metalpotato\|Metalpotato]] ([[User talk:Metalpotato\|talk]]) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 23 January 2015
Line 38:		Line 38:
	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip\|141.101.106.131}}		What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip\|141.101.106.131}}
	:That's what I thought of when I say it and it is a pop culture reference that Randall would surely know, I hope. However, saying that I agree with the Pennpenn and other replies about trying too hard to find a link between subject matter and outside sources. Every time I went into English, people were always trying to find these obscure references and ideas which I'm sure the author/s never intended. -Drcrazy102--[[User:Drcrazy102\|Drcrazy102]] ([[User talk:Drcrazy102\|talk]]) 00:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)		:That's what I thought of when I say it and it is a pop culture reference that Randall would surely know, I hope. However, saying that I agree with the Pennpenn and other replies about trying too hard to find a link between subject matter and outside sources. Every time I went into English, people were always trying to find these obscure references and ideas which I'm sure the author/s never intended. -Drcrazy102--[[User:Drcrazy102\|Drcrazy102]] ([[User talk:Drcrazy102\|talk]]) 00:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	::unrelated
		+	What if...temperature did cause deflategate. If the footballs started at 12.5 psi at 72 degrees F...I get negative 13 degrees F to bring pressure down to 10.5 psi. Using ideal gas law. Amiright? [[User:Shine\|Shine]] ([[User talk:Shine\|talk]]) 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 23 January 2015
Line 37:		Line 37:

	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip\|141.101.106.131}}		What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip\|141.101.106.131}}
		+	:That's what I thought of when I say it and it is a pop culture reference that Randall would surely know, I hope. However, saying that I agree with the Pennpenn and other replies about trying too hard to find a link between subject matter and outside sources. Every time I went into English, people were always trying to find these obscure references and ideas which I'm sure the author/s never intended. -Drcrazy102--[[User:Drcrazy102\|Drcrazy102]] ([[User talk:Drcrazy102\|talk]]) 00:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.180}}
 :I feel that this happens quite a lot here. Not every word and image has to be a reference to something. Even if two things do bear some similarity, it could always be a coincidence caused by a shared culture producing similar ideas. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73|173.245.50.73]] 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip|141.101.106.131}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 22 January 2015
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:I feel that this happens quite a lot here. Not every word and image has to be a reference to something. Even if two things do bear some similarity, it could always be a coincidence caused by a shared culture producing similar ideas. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73\|173.245.50.73]] 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)		:I feel that this happens quite a lot here. Not every word and image has to be a reference to something. Even if two things do bear some similarity, it could always be a coincidence caused by a shared culture producing similar ideas. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73\|173.245.50.73]] 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

−	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬	+	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬ {{unsigned ip\|141.101.106.131}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 22 January 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:

	I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.180}}		I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.180}}
		+	:I feel that this happens quite a lot here. Not every word and image has to be a reference to something. Even if two things do bear some similarity, it could always be a coincidence caused by a shared culture producing similar ideas. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.73\|173.245.50.73]] 15:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬		What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 22 January 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:

	I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.180}}		I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.180}}
		+
		+	What about Futurama? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_Inspection ¬¬¬¬

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 : I had wondered that too. My guess was that he took an available higher res image of the moon or similar, then added the shadows and bright patches from the low res Ceres image. I can tell from the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time. --[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 14:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 : I'm pretty sure Randall just took from that one image of six frying pan bottoms.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.101|108.162.221.101]] 17:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.180}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 22 January 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:
	: I'm pretty sure Randall just took from that one image of six frying pan bottoms.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.101\|108.162.221.101]] 17:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)		: I'm pretty sure Randall just took from that one image of six frying pan bottoms.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.101\|108.162.221.101]] 17:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

−	I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed.	+	I think people are trying too hard to assign meaning to "inspected by number 6" I really think 6 was just an arbitrary number and not a reference to The Prisoner or Battlestar or even Debbie Slade. The lines trying too hard to make "number 6" a reference to something should probably be removed. {{unsigned ip\|173.245.54.180}}