Talk:1521: Sword in the Stone - Revision history

42.book.addict at 17:32, 10 September 2025

2025-09-10T17:32:02Z

CalibansCreations at 07:45, 16 October 2024

2024-10-16T07:45:41Z

42.book.addict at 21:17, 2 February 2024

2024-02-02T21:17:58Z

162.158.74.7 at 15:21, 21 November 2019

2019-11-21T15:21:49Z

162.158.74.7 at 15:21, 21 November 2019

2019-11-21T15:21:16Z

162.158.39.23 at 16:17, 3 June 2019

2019-06-03T16:17:44Z

162.158.39.23 at 16:14, 3 June 2019

2019-06-03T16:14:08Z

162.158.75.178 at 03:16, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T03:16:06Z

162.158.75.178 at 03:14, 9 December 2018

2018-12-09T03:14:35Z

188.114.97.151: opinion

2015-12-22T03:12:39Z

opinion

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 Since this comic is set in the same 'reality' as the legends, and in the legends King Arthur is killed by his illegitimate son, wouldn't accepting the throne be more dangerous than it would be in reality? [[User:The Dining Logician|The Dining Logician]] ([[User talk:The Dining Logician|talk]]) 13:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-[[The legends also say that Arthur never actually died, and was instead taken to Avalon where he was healed.]]
+The legends also say that Arthur never actually died, and was instead taken to Avalon where he was healed. {{unsigned ip|162.158.75.178|03:14 9 December 2018‎ (UTC}}
 On "transgender megan"- implying that transwomen are actually males is rather transphobic. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.176|173.245.52.176]] 00:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 16 October 2024
Line 46:		Line 46:

	: Is England that bad? It’s only 360 days of rain and depression a year, boarding schools, a drink-spiking crisis, a high cost of living, and a failing economy! /s [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 21:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)		: Is England that bad? It’s only 360 days of rain and depression a year, boarding schools, a drink-spiking crisis, a high cost of living, and a failing economy! /s [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 21:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
		+	::brit here, yeah this country sucks [[User:CalibansCreations\|'''<span style="color:#ff0000;">Caliban</span>''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations\|talk]]) 07:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

	I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])		I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 2 February 2024
Line 44:		Line 44:

	: Me too. Maybe it's because I watched today episode 191 of The Big Bang Theory, where a British described England as "Cold, gloomy and easily accessed by a Frenchman through a tunnel." (that last part is context specific). Nonetheless, I've seen the depreciation of England in other media a few times. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.151\|188.114.97.151]] 03:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)		: Me too. Maybe it's because I watched today episode 191 of The Big Bang Theory, where a British described England as "Cold, gloomy and easily accessed by a Frenchman through a tunnel." (that last part is context specific). Nonetheless, I've seen the depreciation of England in other media a few times. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.151\|188.114.97.151]] 03:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Is England that bad? It’s only 360 days of rain and depression a year, boarding schools, a drink-spiking crisis, a high cost of living, and a failing economy! /s [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 21:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

	I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])		I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 21 November 2019
Line 67:		Line 67:

	Can we STOP arguing over ambiguous legends on whether some parts are true canon or not? With this many interpretations of it, we might as well conclude there's NO ONE CANONICAL VERSION![[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.7\|162.158.74.7]] 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)		Can we STOP arguing over ambiguous legends on whether some parts are true canon or not? With this many interpretations of it, we might as well conclude there's NO ONE CANONICAL VERSION![[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.7\|162.158.74.7]] 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
−	:But I have a new headcanon: in this version, the sword was returned, and Megan just found it randomly.	+	:But I have a new headcanon: in this version, the sword was returned, and Megan just found it randomly.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.7\|162.158.74.7]] 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 21 November 2019
Line 65:		Line 65:

	As a Whovian, I think the reason why she puts it back could be because she has had foreknowledge of King Arthur picking up the sword and becoming King of England, so she could attempt to keep history as is when she puts it back. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.166\|108.162.237.166]] 01:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)		As a Whovian, I think the reason why she puts it back could be because she has had foreknowledge of King Arthur picking up the sword and becoming King of England, so she could attempt to keep history as is when she puts it back. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.166\|108.162.237.166]] 01:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Can we STOP arguing over ambiguous legends on whether some parts are true canon or not? With this many interpretations of it, we might as well conclude there's NO ONE CANONICAL VERSION![[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.7\|162.158.74.7]] 15:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
		+	:But I have a new headcanon: in this version, the sword was returned, and Megan just found it randomly.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 : It's clearly Megan.  Perhaps Aurthur has returned in female form (definitely not transgender), but it's unmistakably Megan. [[User:Djbrasier|Djbrasier]] ([[User talk:Djbrasier|talk]]) 13:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 ::Agreed. Why should she even represent Arthur. Anyone who could take the sword out would get the throne. I think the explanation should say it is Megan and that she has taken the role Arthur had once. Also the idea that the new princess can get the throne even if she has younger brothers may be important here as written by another user below. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-::Absolutely agree it's Megan; she has different priorities than Arthur and has more sense than to accept the throne. And siblings are irrelevant. Whoever took the sword out was to be king, regardless of whether they had a brother (even an older one). Arthur's elder brother (ok, adopted, but who knew?) was given the sword, but he didn't pull it out so he didn't get to be king. This was not the English monarchy after all. The surname Pendragon sshows that. The English had not arrived to push the British off to the west coast. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.39.23|162.158.39.23]] 16:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
+::Absolutely agree it's Megan; she has different priorities than Arthur and has more sense than to accept the throne. And siblings are irrelevant. Whoever took the sword out was to be king, regardless of whether they had a brother (even an older one). Arthur's elder brother (ok, adopted, so Arthur was even lower...) was given the sword, but he didn't pull it out so he didn't get to be king. This was not the English monarchy after all. The surname Pendragon shows that. The English had not arrived to push the British off to the west coast. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.39.23|162.158.39.23]] 16:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 In a visual novel, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saber_(Fate/stay_night) King Arthur is a girl]. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.169|108.162.222.169]] 08:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 22 December 2015
Line 41:		Line 41:

	: That was how I interpreted it. Nothing about the election, Princess Charlotte or the British monarchy, it's simply a contrast between the way the throne of 'England' is portrayed in the legend - an illustrious ultimate prize bestowed upon the worthy from on high with bombastic fanfare and supernatural mysticism - and the reality of England being a drab backwater not worth ruling.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.35\|141.101.98.35]] 20:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)		: That was how I interpreted it. Nothing about the election, Princess Charlotte or the British monarchy, it's simply a contrast between the way the throne of 'England' is portrayed in the legend - an illustrious ultimate prize bestowed upon the worthy from on high with bombastic fanfare and supernatural mysticism - and the reality of England being a drab backwater not worth ruling.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.35\|141.101.98.35]] 20:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Me too. Maybe it's because I watched today episode 191 of The Big Bang Theory, where a British described England as "Cold, gloomy and easily accessed by a Frenchman through a tunnel." (that last part is context specific). Nonetheless, I've seen the depreciation of England in other media a few times. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.151\|188.114.97.151]] 03:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

	I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])		I think it's Megan. - [[User:RecentlyChanged\|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged\|talk]])