Talk:154: Beliefs - Revision history

Yorkshire Pudding at 22:58, 21 May 2025

2025-05-21T22:58:34Z

Yorkshire Pudding at 22:57, 21 May 2025

2025-05-21T22:57:11Z

FaviFake at 08:14, 8 July 2023

2023-07-08T08:14:40Z

FaviFake: Thank you for pointing my error out

2023-07-07T21:17:23Z

Thank you for pointing my error out

172.70.85.93: Undo revision 317394 by FaviFake (talk) Revised undo... Don't change people's Talk words for them.

2023-07-07T14:54:57Z

Undo revision 317394 by FaviFake (talk) Revised undo... Don't change people's Talk words for them.

FaviFake: Updated name

2023-07-07T13:31:46Z

Updated name

Nitpicking: Yep, Science Girl

2021-08-17T19:58:44Z

Yep, Science Girl

Kazvorpal at 14:32, 29 September 2019

2019-09-29T14:32:28Z

Kazvorpal at 14:31, 29 September 2019

2019-09-29T14:31:44Z

Hdjensofjfnen at 19:53, 25 September 2018

2018-09-25T19:53:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 21 May 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:
	If openly espousing belief in the patently untrue doesn't disqualify people from running for office, then...well, if we can't stop the people, we've got to try to stop the belief.		If openly espousing belief in the patently untrue doesn't disqualify people from running for office, then...well, if we can't stop the people, we've got to try to stop the belief.

−	That used to be a matter of intellectual pride. It's 2025 though. The above is no longer a matter of ideology; it's a matter of survival.	+	That used to be a matter of intellectual pride. It's 2025 though. The above is no longer a matter of ideology; it's a matter of survival. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding\|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding\|talk]]) 22:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 21 May 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:

	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)		What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Who hold stupid, irrational beliefs that major decisions shouldn't be based upon? People.
		+	And who become senators?
		+	People.
		+	So, who do we need to stop believing in this nonsense?
		+	That's right. Once again, it's people.
		+	If openly espousing belief in the patently untrue doesn't disqualify people from running for office, then...well, if we can't stop the people, we've got to try to stop the belief.
		+
		+	That used to be a matter of intellectual pride. It's 2025 though. The above is no longer a matter of ideology; it's a matter of survival.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :::Reference to future readers: [[User:FaviFake]] has now granted Science Girl the name of [[Jill]] and converted various of the links to that (or to [[Hairbun]], but that's another story). As there should be no changes to other people's valid Talk contributions, this needs pointing out (more than it needs 'correcting'). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.93|172.70.85.93]] 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 ::::Thank you, I'm fairly new here and I didn't know it was considered bad practice to change the links in a talk page. I will be reverting all my edits tomorrow --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ::Almost has to be [[Science Girl]], or a prototype of her at least. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 :::Reference to future readers: [[User:FaviFake]] has now granted Science Girl the name of [[Jill]] and converted various of the links to that (or to [[Hairbun]], but that's another story). As there should be no changes to other people's valid Talk contributions, this needs pointing out (more than it needs 'correcting'). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.93|172.70.85.93]] 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::::The girls is definately not [[Danish]]. Danish has some special personality traits (being mean and clever and not caring a thing about other). The hair is just a small thing. Also children are neither Megan nor Cueball as these are adults. I have removed reference to Danish. Actually it is the professor that looks like Megan! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 ::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
-Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Jill]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
+Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
-::Almost has to be [[Jill]], or a prototype of her at least. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
+::Almost has to be [[Science Girl]], or a prototype of her at least. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 29 September 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen\|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen\|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)		Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen\|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen\|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

−	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein ~~was~~ correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)	+	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein and Schrodinger were correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 29 September 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16\|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)		::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16\|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
	Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen\|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen\|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)		Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen\|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen\|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	What needs to be pointed out more is that science is a system of working toward finding the truth, that requires its adherents to remember that they never actually know for certain. A lot of modern "scientists" follow the same bad methodology as adherents of the geocentric model and astrology once did. Cosmology and quantum mechanics are full of epicycles, deferents, positivism, and static projection. Einstein was correct to be horrified by that. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 14:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 25 September 2018
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::::The girls is definately not [[Danish]]. Danish has some special personality traits (being mean and clever and not caring a thing about other). The hair is just a small thing. Also children are neither Megan nor Cueball as these are adults. I have removed reference to Danish. Actually it is the professor that looks like Megan! --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 11:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		::::The girls is definately not [[Danish]]. Danish has some special personality traits (being mean and clever and not caring a thing about other). The hair is just a small thing. Also children are neither Megan nor Cueball as these are adults. I have removed reference to Danish. Actually it is the professor that looks like Megan! --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 11:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
	::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16\|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)		::::Randall definitely uses a specific cast of characters, each of which repeat characteristic behaviors & are recognizable primarily by consistent depiction of individual hairstyles. I encourage everyone to continue attempting to identify & thereby more fully understand each character, based upon their relative hairstyles & attitudes. (... "~ how are they connected? Hairstyles & attitudes, how do they relate? How well do we use our freedom to choose, the illusions we create?" - Timbuk 3) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.16\|108.162.221.16]] 18:39, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
		+	Actually, my question is whether the girl on the left is [[Science Girl]]. [[User:Hdjensofjfnen\|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen\|talk]]) 19:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)