Talk:1556: The Sky - Revision history

Lackadaisical at 18:40, 22 May 2017

2017-05-22T18:40:05Z

Kynde at 15:17, 30 January 2017

2017-01-30T15:17:30Z

Lackadaisical at 12:46, 29 July 2016

2016-07-29T12:46:03Z

Davidy22 at 08:34, 29 July 2016

2016-07-29T08:34:19Z

Jaalenja: /* Still incomplete? */ new section

2016-07-29T08:11:03Z

‎Still incomplete?: new section

188.114.97.30: my opinion

2016-01-19T23:12:28Z

my opinion

141.101.104.124 at 10:48, 16 October 2015

2015-10-16T10:48:33Z

141.101.104.80: Relevant "what-if" entry

2015-08-17T11:25:03Z

Relevant "what-if" entry

Davidy22: Reverted edits by Cheap18 (talk) to last revision by 108.162.237.162

2015-08-16T12:25:42Z

Reverted edits by Cheap18 (talk) to last revision by 108.162.237.162

Cheap18 at 09:31, 16 August 2015

2015-08-16T09:31:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 22 May 2017
Line 79:		Line 79:
	:When I edited it I left the incomplete tag so the rest of the site could review it and decide if it was sufficient. I still don't feel comfortable removing the tag myself because I am one of the last ones to edit it. The two reverts you see were reverts of an editor who marked many incomplete articles as complete and thereby interfering with the work of this site. If you feel that the explanation is now complete enough you may remove the tag with a quick explanation for why. [[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 12:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)		:When I edited it I left the incomplete tag so the rest of the site could review it and decide if it was sufficient. I still don't feel comfortable removing the tag myself because I am one of the last ones to edit it. The two reverts you see were reverts of an editor who marked many incomplete articles as complete and thereby interfering with the work of this site. If you feel that the explanation is now complete enough you may remove the tag with a quick explanation for why. [[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 12:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
	::I believe that it was no way near complete, because someone deleted almost all of the exploitation and he was not logged in. When I came here it was marked as complete but I highly disagree. And have tried to rewrite the original explanation that where deleted, hopefully making it a better job, and then including the few bits that where added since the major deletion. As it was already completed and I think I improved it, I will leave it complete and let other decide if it should be changed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 15:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)		::I believe that it was no way near complete, because someone deleted almost all of the exploitation and he was not logged in. When I came here it was marked as complete but I highly disagree. And have tried to rewrite the original explanation that where deleted, hopefully making it a better job, and then including the few bits that where added since the major deletion. As it was already completed and I think I improved it, I will leave it complete and let other decide if it should be changed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 15:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
		+	::Thank you Kynde, while I think it's a rather wordy explanation I respect the content and that some users may want to know more about the types of clouds depicted. I have no desire to edit this further but your edits certainly provide a more complete explanation. I did not realize how much had been deleted in previous edits. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 18:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 30 January 2017
Line 78:		Line 78:
	I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja\|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja\|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)		I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja\|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja\|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
	:When I edited it I left the incomplete tag so the rest of the site could review it and decide if it was sufficient. I still don't feel comfortable removing the tag myself because I am one of the last ones to edit it. The two reverts you see were reverts of an editor who marked many incomplete articles as complete and thereby interfering with the work of this site. If you feel that the explanation is now complete enough you may remove the tag with a quick explanation for why. [[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 12:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)		:When I edited it I left the incomplete tag so the rest of the site could review it and decide if it was sufficient. I still don't feel comfortable removing the tag myself because I am one of the last ones to edit it. The two reverts you see were reverts of an editor who marked many incomplete articles as complete and thereby interfering with the work of this site. If you feel that the explanation is now complete enough you may remove the tag with a quick explanation for why. [[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 12:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
		+	::I believe that it was no way near complete, because someone deleted almost all of the exploitation and he was not logged in. When I came here it was marked as complete but I highly disagree. And have tried to rewrite the original explanation that where deleted, hopefully making it a better job, and then including the few bits that where added since the major deletion. As it was already completed and I think I improved it, I will leave it complete and let other decide if it should be changed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 15:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 29 July 2016
Line 77:		Line 77:

	I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja\|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja\|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)		I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja\|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja\|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
		+	:When I edited it I left the incomplete tag so the rest of the site could review it and decide if it was sufficient. I still don't feel comfortable removing the tag myself because I am one of the last ones to edit it. The two reverts you see were reverts of an editor who marked many incomplete articles as complete and thereby interfering with the work of this site. If you feel that the explanation is now complete enough you may remove the tag with a quick explanation for why. [[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 12:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 I think [[915]] is in effect here, and I disagree that this isn't a humorous comic. As I see it, it's an experience shared by a lot of people being described in a geeky way, which is also a common theme in xkcd. Also, but I believe this one less, there could be humor in the fact that the sky is preferred over the other half, as the other half is more important to sustain life. Sure, we need air to breathe, but it's kinda there, we virtually don't have to do anything with it to use it. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.30|188.114.97.30]] 23:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
-== Still incomplete? ==
+;Still incomplete?
 I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 29 July 2016
Line 73:		Line 73:

	I think [[915]] is in effect here, and I disagree that this isn't a humorous comic. As I see it, it's an experience shared by a lot of people being described in a geeky way, which is also a common theme in xkcd. Also, but I believe this one less, there could be humor in the fact that the sky is preferred over the other half, as the other half is more important to sustain life. Sure, we need air to breathe, but it's kinda there, we virtually don't have to do anything with it to use it. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.30\|188.114.97.30]] 23:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)		I think [[915]] is in effect here, and I disagree that this isn't a humorous comic. As I see it, it's an experience shared by a lot of people being described in a geeky way, which is also a common theme in xkcd. Also, but I believe this one less, there could be humor in the fact that the sky is preferred over the other half, as the other half is more important to sustain life. Sure, we need air to breathe, but it's kinda there, we virtually don't have to do anything with it to use it. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.30\|188.114.97.30]] 23:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Still incomplete? ==
		+
		+	I think the little dialogues is sufficiently explained, and the picture itself is also described in enough detail. What is still missing? The incomplete tag is very outdated, with he mentioned "poorly written, misspelled version" having been written several edits ago, and if I'm any judge the current version is written well enough. The only reason why I am writing this instead of just removing the tag is because it has already been done and undone twice. Seriously, if someone feels this page still needs something, at least update the tag! [[User:Jaalenja\|Jaalenja]] ([[User talk:Jaalenja\|talk]]) 08:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 19 January 2016
Line 71:		Line 71:

	Umm why does the article talks of the other half as the ocean? I would call earth the other half. It IS the other half of our vision if we are on open fields like they are... Only because of the shipwrecks I think it is far streched that it is only meant for the ocean. The snake part suggests the earth more then seasnakes. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.124\|141.101.104.124]] 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)		Umm why does the article talks of the other half as the ocean? I would call earth the other half. It IS the other half of our vision if we are on open fields like they are... Only because of the shipwrecks I think it is far streched that it is only meant for the ocean. The snake part suggests the earth more then seasnakes. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.124\|141.101.104.124]] 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think [[915]] is in effect here, and I disagree that this isn't a humorous comic. As I see it, it's an experience shared by a lot of people being described in a geeky way, which is also a common theme in xkcd. Also, but I believe this one less, there could be humor in the fact that the sky is preferred over the other half, as the other half is more important to sustain life. Sure, we need air to breathe, but it's kinda there, we virtually don't have to do anything with it to use it. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.97.30\|188.114.97.30]] 23:12, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 16 October 2015
Line 69:		Line 69:
	What If entry "Jupiter submarine" seems to indicate that the oceans are suppoed to be the other half:		What If entry "Jupiter submarine" seems to indicate that the oceans are suppoed to be the other half:
	''Air and water are different. This seems straightforward enough, but they're also the same in a lot of ways. They're both "fluids," and some of the same rules apply to each. In some sense, when you look up at the sky, you're looking up from the bottom of a deep sea of air.'' [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.80\|141.101.104.80]] 11:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)		''Air and water are different. This seems straightforward enough, but they're also the same in a lot of ways. They're both "fluids," and some of the same rules apply to each. In some sense, when you look up at the sky, you're looking up from the bottom of a deep sea of air.'' [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.80\|141.101.104.80]] 11:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Umm why does the article talks of the other half as the ocean? I would call earth the other half. It IS the other half of our vision if we are on open fields like they are... Only because of the shipwrecks I think it is far streched that it is only meant for the ocean. The snake part suggests the earth more then seasnakes. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.124\|141.101.104.124]] 10:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 17 August 2015
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Tom Petty has a song 'Circus' with lyrics "Half of me is ocean, half of me is sky" - http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/tompettyandtheheartbreakers/wallscircus.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.162\|108.162.237.162]] 03:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)		Tom Petty has a song 'Circus' with lyrics "Half of me is ocean, half of me is sky" - http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/tompettyandtheheartbreakers/wallscircus.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.162\|108.162.237.162]] 03:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	What If entry "Jupiter submarine" seems to indicate that the oceans are suppoed to be the other half:
		+	''Air and water are different. This seems straightforward enough, but they're also the same in a lot of ways. They're both "fluids," and some of the same rules apply to each. In some sense, when you look up at the sky, you're looking up from the bottom of a deep sea of air.'' [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.80\|141.101.104.80]] 11:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Maybe, maybe the comic is a slight refference to the recent observetory of plutos athmosphere. [[User:ẞ qwertz|ẞ qwertz]] ([[User talk:ẞ qwertz|talk]]) 12:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 Maybe this comic is related to comic [[1368]]? [[User:Gartenzaun|Gartenzaun]] ([[User talk:Gartenzaun|talk]]) 13:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
@@ Line 68: / Line 66: @@
 Tom Petty has a song 'Circus' with lyrics "Half of me is ocean, half of me is sky" - http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/tompettyandtheheartbreakers/wallscircus.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.162|108.162.237.162]] 03:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)