Talk:1564: Every Seven Seconds - Revision history

Bautistaarian at 20:39, 7 March 2025

2025-03-07T20:39:39Z

International Space Station at 04:53, 7 October 2015

2015-10-07T04:53:48Z

Aasasd at 08:01, 18 August 2015

2015-08-18T08:01:47Z

Davidy22 at 23:28, 15 August 2015

2015-08-15T23:28:55Z

Comet: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */

2015-08-15T20:38:57Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds

Comet: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */

2015-08-15T20:35:39Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds

Comet: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */

2015-08-15T20:30:12Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds

Comet: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */

2015-08-15T20:27:40Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds

Hkmaly: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */

2015-08-15T12:01:18Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds

108.162.237.191: /* Plausibility of every seven seconds */ new section

2015-08-15T07:10:14Z

‎Plausibility of every seven seconds: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 7 March 2025
Line 47:		Line 47:

	I think about sex WAY more than I'd like to admit, and involving a thing I'd rather not admit either, and I'm a girl. Given that I spend about minimum 3-4 hours per day either masturbating or drawing porn or in general thinking sexy thoughts, yes. On average, I personally think of sex every 7ish seconds. Yes, I realize this is an issue. No, it's not interfering with the important, college-related things in my life. No I don't care to "fix" my "problem" Hahaha! [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 04:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)		I think about sex WAY more than I'd like to admit, and involving a thing I'd rather not admit either, and I'm a girl. Given that I spend about minimum 3-4 hours per day either masturbating or drawing porn or in general thinking sexy thoughts, yes. On average, I personally think of sex every 7ish seconds. Yes, I realize this is an issue. No, it's not interfering with the important, college-related things in my life. No I don't care to "fix" my "problem" Hahaha! [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 04:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	The statistic is true, but beacause Glenn Quagmire thinks about sex every few microseconds the average is skewed. [[User:Bautistaarian\|Bautistaarian]] ([[User talk:Bautistaarian\|talk]]) 20:39, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 7 October 2015
Line 45:		Line 45:

	You are standing on a garden path. To the left, the complex houses married and single soldiers and their families. To the right, the horse raced past the barn fell. The old man the boat. The government plans to raise taxes were defeated. [[User:Aasasd\|Aasasd]] ([[User talk:Aasasd\|talk]]) 08:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)		You are standing on a garden path. To the left, the complex houses married and single soldiers and their families. To the right, the horse raced past the barn fell. The old man the boat. The government plans to raise taxes were defeated. [[User:Aasasd\|Aasasd]] ([[User talk:Aasasd\|talk]]) 08:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think about sex WAY more than I'd like to admit, and involving a thing I'd rather not admit either, and I'm a girl. Given that I spend about minimum 3-4 hours per day either masturbating or drawing porn or in general thinking sexy thoughts, yes. On average, I personally think of sex every 7ish seconds. Yes, I realize this is an issue. No, it's not interfering with the important, college-related things in my life. No I don't care to "fix" my "problem" Hahaha! [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 04:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 18 August 2015
Line 43:		Line 43:
	Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when for each direct and indirect thought about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.		Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when for each direct and indirect thought about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.
	[[User:Comet\|Comet]] ([[User talk:Comet\|talk]]) 20:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Comet\|Comet]] ([[User talk:Comet\|talk]]) 20:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	You are standing on a garden path. To the left, the complex houses married and single soldiers and their families. To the right, the horse raced past the barn fell. The old man the boat. The government plans to raise taxes were defeated. [[User:Aasasd\|Aasasd]] ([[User talk:Aasasd\|talk]]) 08:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 :Agreed, nowhere does the comic imply that Cueball is thinking about any "team". His thoughts are about how ridiculous the fact is. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.156|162.158.255.156]] 04:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
-== Plausibility of every seven seconds ==
+;Plausibility of every seven seconds
 Cueball is thinking about it from a statician's standpoint (units have a tendency to be within a couple orders of magnitude at furthest). However, it should be pointed out that from a math & physics perspective, there's nothing irrational about the comment at all. Afterall, a person can assume that it's an average. (Afterall, it would be difficult for a counterpoint of un-concious un-dreaming men to be thinking about sex every seven seconds.) "Once" leaves a lot of wiggle room as "once" is not coupled with any particular unit of measurement. Once could be one second, it could be seven seconds, it could be a millionth of a second.

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 :If you think about it from a math & physics perspective, you are actually showing how ridiculously unsubstantial that "once per 7 seconds per average" statement is. Puting aside the "how do you count that" problem, the BBC approach of counting how many times per day people think about sex makes more sense. For example, if you are actually HAVING sex, you are likely to think about it for (significantly) longer than 7 seconds without interruption. (Jokes about premature ejaculation and about women thinking what to make for dinner while having sex notwithstanding.) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
-Having sex an average of an hour each day and defining "thinking about" as to cover each moment would give a rate of once every twenty-four seconds.  Note that if ones definition of "thinking about" allows for multiple thoughts in parallel (e.g. while thinking and enjoying a concert, think of sex AND drugs) would increase the feasibility of such high ratios.
+Having sex an average of an hour each day and defining "thinking about" as to cover each moment would give a rate of once every twenty-four seconds.  Note that if ones definition of "thinking about" allows for multiple thoughts in parallel (e.g. while dancing at a concert, think of the beat, the melody,  your partners, the crowd, your current/anticipated dance moves, the lyrics, sex AND drugs) would increase the feasibility of such high ratios.
 Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when for each direct and indirect thought about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.
 [[User:Comet|Comet]] ([[User talk:Comet|talk]]) 20:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 Having sex an average of an hour each day and defining "thinking about" as to cover each moment would give a rate of once every twenty-four seconds.  Note that if ones definition of "thinking about" allows for multiple thoughts in parallel, that capacity (e.g. one can hold seven trains of thoughts simultaneously) would increase the feasibility of such high ratios.
-Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when they think about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.
+Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when for each direct and indirect thought about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.
 [[User:Comet|Comet]] ([[User talk:Comet|talk]]) 20:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 15 August 2015
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:If you think about it from a math & physics perspective, you are actually showing how ridiculously unsubstantial that "once per 7 seconds per average" statement is. Puting aside the "how do you count that" problem, the BBC approach of counting how many times per day people think about sex makes more sense. For example, if you are actually HAVING sex, you are likely to think about it for (significantly) longer than 7 seconds without interruption. (Jokes about premature ejaculation and about women thinking what to make for dinner while having sex notwithstanding.) -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 12:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)		:If you think about it from a math & physics perspective, you are actually showing how ridiculously unsubstantial that "once per 7 seconds per average" statement is. Puting aside the "how do you count that" problem, the BBC approach of counting how many times per day people think about sex makes more sense. For example, if you are actually HAVING sex, you are likely to think about it for (significantly) longer than 7 seconds without interruption. (Jokes about premature ejaculation and about women thinking what to make for dinner while having sex notwithstanding.) -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 12:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
		+	Having sex an average of an hour each day and defining "thinking about" as to cover each moment would give a rate of once every twenty-four seconds. Note that if ones definition of "thinking about" allows for multiple thoughts in parallel, that capacity (e.g. one can hold seven trains of thoughts simultaneously) would increase the feasibility of such high ratios.
		+
		+	Measuring frequency of sexual thoughts by giving a click counter for subjects to press when they think about sex can approach 100%, if the subject thinks about sex by considering whether to push the button, because each button press would correspond to another thought to be tallied.
		+	[[User:Comet\|Comet]] ([[User talk:Comet\|talk]]) 20:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 15 August 2015
Line 37:		Line 37:

	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.191\|108.162.237.191]] 07:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.191\|108.162.237.191]] 07:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	:If you think about it from a math & physics perspective, you are actually showing how ridiculously unsubstantial that "once per 7 seconds per average" statement is. Puting aside the "how do you count that" problem, the BBC approach of counting how many times per day people think about sex makes more sense. For example, if you are actually HAVING sex, you are likely to think about it for (significantly) longer than 7 seconds without interruption. (Jokes about premature ejaculation and about women thinking what to make for dinner while having sex notwithstanding.) -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 12:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 15 August 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I think the Explanation is missing the obvious connotations to this joke. For example, ''"Cueball is a sociologist who disbelieves in a team of his colleagues actually studying such a difficult subject"'' what does this even mean? The explanation is that sociologists (implied: all sociologists) think about the urban myth every seven seconds and the thought bubbles in the comic are their possible thoughts. Each thought bubble would take place predictably every seven seconds. The setup is that thinking about sex every seven seconds would be dysfunctional and unproductive in addition to making working, social interactions, etc... nearly impossible as explained by the sociologists thoughts. The punch line is that thinking about how ridiculous it is to think about sex every seven seconds is just as dysfunctional and unproductive even if the thought time is spent refuting the original notion as understood in third person.--[[User:R0hrshach\|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach\|talk]]) 16:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)		I think the Explanation is missing the obvious connotations to this joke. For example, ''"Cueball is a sociologist who disbelieves in a team of his colleagues actually studying such a difficult subject"'' what does this even mean? The explanation is that sociologists (implied: all sociologists) think about the urban myth every seven seconds and the thought bubbles in the comic are their possible thoughts. Each thought bubble would take place predictably every seven seconds. The setup is that thinking about sex every seven seconds would be dysfunctional and unproductive in addition to making working, social interactions, etc... nearly impossible as explained by the sociologists thoughts. The punch line is that thinking about how ridiculous it is to think about sex every seven seconds is just as dysfunctional and unproductive even if the thought time is spent refuting the original notion as understood in third person.--[[User:R0hrshach\|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach\|talk]]) 16:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
	:Agreed, nowhere does the comic imply that Cueball is thinking about any "team". His thoughts are about how ridiculous the fact is. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.156\|162.158.255.156]] 04:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)		:Agreed, nowhere does the comic imply that Cueball is thinking about any "team". His thoughts are about how ridiculous the fact is. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.156\|162.158.255.156]] 04:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Plausibility of every seven seconds ==
		+
		+	Cueball is thinking about it from a statician's standpoint (units have a tendency to be within a couple orders of magnitude at furthest). However, it should be pointed out that from a math & physics perspective, there's nothing irrational about the comment at all. Afterall, a person can assume that it's an average. (Afterall, it would be difficult for a counterpoint of un-concious un-dreaming men to be thinking about sex every seven seconds.) "Once" leaves a lot of wiggle room as "once" is not coupled with any particular unit of measurement. Once could be one second, it could be seven seconds, it could be a millionth of a second.
		+
		+	All a man (or woman) would have to do is think about sex once in their entire lifespan, and that moment would just have to be divided by 1/7th of all of the seconds in their life combined, and you have your average figure.
		+
		+	So, considering that interpretation, I would like to present my mathmatical observation to provide a more complete picture of men thinking of sex every seven seconds...
		+
		+	Women think about sex once every 3 seconds.
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.191\|108.162.237.191]] 07:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)