Talk:1619: Watson Medical Algorithm - Revision history

Nitpicking at 19:58, 19 January 2022

2022-01-19T19:58:36Z

162.158.203.25 at 23:34, 11 April 2021

2021-04-11T23:34:22Z

162.158.79.71 at 02:52, 17 September 2017

2017-09-17T02:52:34Z

Berets at 22:45, 1 August 2017

2017-08-01T22:45:54Z

108.162.215.7 at 22:59, 23 May 2016

2016-05-23T22:59:32Z

162.158.83.18 at 00:17, 18 May 2016

2016-05-18T00:17:22Z

108.162.221.11 at 02:05, 4 February 2016

2016-02-04T02:05:00Z

162.158.255.46 at 15:48, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T15:48:15Z

162.158.255.46 at 15:43, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T15:43:35Z

162.158.255.46 at 14:55, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T14:55:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 19 January 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"but can close tissue damage" - I think this is a typo and "close" is supposed to be "cause"		"but can close tissue damage" - I think this is a typo and "close" is supposed to be "cause"
		+	:Fixed. I haven't bothered doing the research, but I would guess fixed about five years later. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 19:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

	Build environment is still insane since comic #371. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.2.139}}		Build environment is still insane since comic #371. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.2.139}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 11 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	"but can close tissue damage" - I think this is a typo and "close" is supposed to be "cause"
		+
	Build environment is still insane since comic #371. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.2.139}}		Build environment is still insane since comic #371. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.2.139}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 17 September 2017
Line 73:		Line 73:

	Squeezing the patient again if yellow liquid comes out until another color comes out could be popping a pimple or other pustule until it instead starts bleeding (if red is what then comes out). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.7\|108.162.215.7]] 22:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)		Squeezing the patient again if yellow liquid comes out until another color comes out could be popping a pimple or other pustule until it instead starts bleeding (if red is what then comes out). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.7\|108.162.215.7]] 22:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	"comforting unsuccesful" Dammit, Randall, how did you mess that up? And how did no one else spot that? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.71\|162.158.79.71]] 02:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 1 August 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:"OK, who swapped out Baymax's programming card with a Doomba AI?" [[User:VectorLightning\|VectorLightning]] ([[User talk:VectorLightning\|talk]]) 08:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)		:"OK, who swapped out Baymax's programming card with a Doomba AI?" [[User:VectorLightning\|VectorLightning]] ([[User talk:VectorLightning\|talk]]) 08:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::I hope it's ok that I deleted the part of the explanation saying that Watson's behaviour in this comic is comparable to Baymax, since it's really... not. :P [[User:Berets\|Berets]] ([[User talk:Berets\|talk]]) 22:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

	Well, at least the autoconfig isn't as threatening as #416.		Well, at least the autoconfig isn't as threatening as #416.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 23 May 2016
Line 70:		Line 70:

	What could happen if I rate my pain level as 10 three times? There is no more eye left to remove, so would the algorithm crash? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.18\|162.158.83.18]] 00:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)		What could happen if I rate my pain level as 10 three times? There is no more eye left to remove, so would the algorithm crash? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.18\|162.158.83.18]] 00:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Squeezing the patient again if yellow liquid comes out until another color comes out could be popping a pimple or other pustule until it instead starts bleeding (if red is what then comes out). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.7\|108.162.215.7]] 22:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 18 May 2016
Line 68:		Line 68:
	I can't help feeling some of the information on this page are meant as jokes, like "disect the doctor for parts" being "may be considered ethically dubious". Is there someone who can clarify these? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.191\|162.158.72.191]] 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)		I can't help feeling some of the information on this page are meant as jokes, like "disect the doctor for parts" being "may be considered ethically dubious". Is there someone who can clarify these? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.191\|162.158.72.191]] 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
	:I believe the author of the information is giving the robot the benefit of the doubt. After all, some of these may very well be acceptable under the right circumstances, and you know what they say about those who assume! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.11\|108.162.221.11]] 02:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)		:I believe the author of the information is giving the robot the benefit of the doubt. After all, some of these may very well be acceptable under the right circumstances, and you know what they say about those who assume! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.11\|108.162.221.11]] 02:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	What could happen if I rate my pain level as 10 three times? There is no more eye left to remove, so would the algorithm crash? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.18\|162.158.83.18]] 00:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 4 February 2016
Line 67:		Line 67:

	I can't help feeling some of the information on this page are meant as jokes, like "disect the doctor for parts" being "may be considered ethically dubious". Is there someone who can clarify these? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.191\|162.158.72.191]] 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)		I can't help feeling some of the information on this page are meant as jokes, like "disect the doctor for parts" being "may be considered ethically dubious". Is there someone who can clarify these? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.72.191\|162.158.72.191]] 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:I believe the author of the information is giving the robot the benefit of the doubt. After all, some of these may very well be acceptable under the right circumstances, and you know what they say about those who assume! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.11\|108.162.221.11]] 02:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 This algorithm certainly does not exit without the death of the patient, however, such a death can result from old age as long as the patient can make it to the bottom right infinite loop and continuously reports a number from 0-9 for pain. It IS possible to make it to that loop alive. Extremely low blood oxygen levels have been recorded in healthy Everest climbers, but the article I read gave the results in kilopascals, not in % so I don't know how that converts. However, repeatedly reporting a pain level of 0-8 would result in continuous scalp massages, which may actually be considered pleasant. [[User:Kashim|Kashim]] ([[User talk:Kashim|talk]]) 20:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 : I get the feeling that even if people can survive at low oxygen levels at a decent level for a time, it's not going to be either healthy or prolonged. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 04:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 I think this may be the least undesirable path through the flowchart:

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 The part about squeezing and looking for the color of the ooze seems to reference Humorism. The colors match the four humors. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.188|162.158.91.188]] 15:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 : No it does not match -- the colors would be red-black-yellow-'''blue''' (not green) -- the blue is for water [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Humorism.svg/1022px-Humorism.svg.png like in this diagram] --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.46|162.158.255.46]] 14:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 I'm surprised he didn't make a Dr Watson joke/reference.--[[User:R0hrshach|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach|talk]]) 17:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 24 December 2015
Line 38:		Line 38:

	The part about squeezing and looking for the color of the ooze seems to reference Humorism. The colors match the four humors. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.188\|162.158.91.188]] 15:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)		The part about squeezing and looking for the color of the ooze seems to reference Humorism. The colors match the four humors. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.188\|162.158.91.188]] 15:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	: No it does not match -- the colors would be red-black-yellow-'''blue''' (not green) -- the blue is for water [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Humorism.svg/1022px-Humorism.svg.png like in this diagram] --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.46\|162.158.255.46]] 14:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

	I'm surprised he didn't make a Dr Watson joke/reference.--[[User:R0hrshach\|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach\|talk]]) 17:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)		I'm surprised he didn't make a Dr Watson joke/reference.--[[User:R0hrshach\|R0hrshach]] ([[User talk:R0hrshach\|talk]]) 17:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)