Talk:1621: Fixion - Revision history

162.158.146.41: Please update entry: Superliminally smoothed anisotropies

2023-05-22T08:31:05Z

Please update entry: Superliminally smoothed anisotropies

Miamiclay: Suggesting sigma section edit

2015-12-27T20:59:08Z

Suggesting sigma section edit

108.162.221.26 at 16:05, 26 December 2015

2015-12-26T16:05:03Z

162.158.91.192 at 15:03, 26 December 2015

2015-12-26T15:03:47Z

108.162.245.179: Add science.

2015-12-25T23:49:37Z

Add science.

Dmbreakey at 18:48, 25 December 2015

2015-12-25T18:48:01Z

Dmbreakey at 18:47, 25 December 2015

2015-12-25T18:47:46Z

Papayaman1000: Discussion

2015-12-25T05:56:05Z

Discussion

108.162.245.179: Remove extra italics.

2015-12-25T05:18:16Z

Remove extra italics.

108.162.245.179: First!

2015-12-25T05:17:08Z

First!

New page

The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or ''parsimony'' is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 22 May 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job. I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which" sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively. But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point. I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)		Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job. I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which" sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively. But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point. I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Re: "this will improve with the BICEP3 data that should be published in 2016." - I assume this will have happened by now but I'm not familiar with where to look. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.41\|162.158.146.41]] 08:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 27 December 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Maybe also a Glossary? GUT is defined on the page after use, and I mostly hit Federal Reserve Board before: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_radio_burst Fast Radio Burst] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.26\|108.162.221.26]] 16:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)		Maybe also a Glossary? GUT is defined on the page after use, and I mostly hit Federal Reserve Board before: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_radio_burst Fast Radio Burst] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.26\|108.162.221.26]] 16:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job. I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which" sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively. But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point. I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 26 December 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Question is: Is the Fixion an Anion, a Kation or a Fermion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.192\|162.158.91.192]] 15:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)		Question is: Is the Fixion an Anion, a Kation or a Fermion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.192\|162.158.91.192]] 15:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Maybe also a Glossary? GUT is defined on the page after use, and I mostly hit Federal Reserve Board before: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_radio_burst Fast Radio Burst] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.26\|108.162.221.26]] 16:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 26 December 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Actually, as far as I can tell, [[Randall]] is referencing the material [http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02165 here]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 23:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		Actually, as far as I can tell, [[Randall]] is referencing the material [http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02165 here]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 23:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Question is: Is the Fixion an Anion, a Kation or a Fermion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.192\|162.158.91.192]] 15:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 25 December 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ... --[[User:Dmbreakey\|Dmbreakey]] ([[User talk:Dmbreakey\|talk]]) 18:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ... --[[User:Dmbreakey\|Dmbreakey]] ([[User talk:Dmbreakey\|talk]]) 18:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Actually, as far as I can tell, [[Randall]] is referencing the material [http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02165 here]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 23:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 25 December 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	[[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

−	Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ...	+	Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ... --[[User:Dmbreakey\|Dmbreakey]] ([[User talk:Dmbreakey\|talk]]) 18:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 25 December 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The next time someone ask me what "Deus Ex Machina" or parsmony is, I'm still linking them to [https://www.tvtropes.org TV Tropes].		The next time someone ask me what "Deus Ex Machina" or parsmony is, I'm still linking them to [https://www.tvtropes.org TV Tropes].
	[[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ...

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 25 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or parsimony is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)		The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or parsimony is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	The next time someone ask me what "Deus Ex Machina" or parsmony is, I'm still linking them to [https://www.tvtropes.org TV Tropes].
		+	[[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 25 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or ''parsimony'' is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)	+	The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or parsimony is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179\|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)