Talk:172: Skateboarding is Not a Crime - Revision history

Kazvorpal at 04:13, 6 October 2019

2019-10-06T04:13:58Z

2019-10-06T04:11:57Z

2016-02-12T21:09:43Z

2016-02-12T21:01:34Z

2015-09-18T04:23:16Z

2014-11-19T06:10:28Z

2014-11-19T06:06:58Z

2013-09-05T22:28:30Z

2013-09-05T22:28:02Z

Created page with "How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's?"

New page

How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 6 October 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.255.162}}		Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.255.162}}
		+	:Yes, associating police brutality with racism helps corrupt officials cover up the real problem: The police brutality itself, which is part of a systematic problem. Even if the cops doing it are racist, they wouldn't dare express the racism in that way, if not for the mentality the police state has toward the people it's supposed to serve. —[[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 04:13, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:11, 6 October 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)		Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
		+	:Skateboarding cannot ''legitimately'' be outlawed. That is an example of an unjust law...and an unjust law is no law at all. — [[User:Kazvorpal\|Kazvorpal]] ([[User talk:Kazvorpal\|talk]]) 04:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

	Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.255.162}}		Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.255.162}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 12 February 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)		Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

−	Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case.	+	Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.255.162}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 12 February 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)		Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Just a note, a lot of people are taking the same kind of stand with police brutality nowadays, people agree that it is bad, but whenever a black person is arrested most people usually associate it with police racism, even if that was evidently not the case.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 18 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm glad I'm not the only one. I can't get over the fact that the sticker goes over the second and fourth locker. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.203}}		I'm glad I'm not the only one. I can't get over the fact that the sticker goes over the second and fourth locker. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.203}}
		+
		+	Skateboarding can be outlawed; "Stupid stickers," on the other hand, are conditionally protected free speech [[User:Danshoham\|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham\|talk]]) 04:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:10, 19 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's? [[Special:Contributions/67.188.195.182\|67.188.195.182]] 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)		How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's? [[Special:Contributions/67.188.195.182\|67.188.195.182]] 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

−	I'm glad I'm not the only one. I can't get over the fact that the sticker goes over the second and fourth locker.	+	I'm glad I'm not the only one. I can't get over the fact that the sticker goes over the second and fourth locker. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.203}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:06, 19 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's? [[Special:Contributions/67.188.195.182\|67.188.195.182]] 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)		How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's? [[Special:Contributions/67.188.195.182\|67.188.195.182]] 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I'm glad I'm not the only one. I can't get over the fact that the sticker goes over the second and fourth locker.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 5 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's?	+	How would the second locker be opened by its user? Would s/he and the fourth locker's owner break the law as well as the third's? [[Special:Contributions/67.188.195.182\|67.188.195.182]] 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)