Talk:1792: Bird/Plane/Superman - Revision history

Titaniumlegs at 06:26, 15 July 2025

2025-07-15T06:26:06Z

2025-07-04T16:47:01Z

2022-05-23T22:55:19Z

Undo revision 275984 by Xray Kilo Charlie Delta (talk) Unreverting a vandalliser-reverted state.

2022-05-23T18:33:03Z

2022-05-23T18:32:19Z

2022-05-23T18:31:47Z

2022-05-23T18:31:36Z

2022-05-23T18:31:26Z

2022-04-22T21:03:33Z

Reference to seagull taking a punch and still be able to fly away

2022-03-26T00:13:19Z

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 Planes are definitely capable of releasing their poop intentionally.  They choose not to.  Truth Rating:  Pants On Fire.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.76|108.162.219.76]] 14:47, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 : It depends what you mean by 'plane poop'. Is it engines exhaust? Fuel, hydraulic oil or other technical fluids? Or is it ''passengers' '' poop... If you mean the latter than no, there's no "empty toilet in mid flight" functionality. A malfunction may cause the toilet contents to spill over but it is not intentional. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 11:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 The Indian government thinks planes do intentionally release their poop. Citation: [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/india-fine-airlines-dropping-human-waste-poo-passenger-jets-on-homes-a7488491.html] -- [[21:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC) User:Scryer]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 4 July 2025
Line 57:		Line 57:

	This page has quite a few typos and instances of awkward phrasing. I'll go through it and clean it up in a bit.<br>--[[User:Sensorfire\|Sensorfire]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire\|talk]]) 01:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)		This page has quite a few typos and instances of awkward phrasing. I'll go through it and clean it up in a bit.<br>--[[User:Sensorfire\|Sensorfire]] ([[User talk:Sensorfire\|talk]]) 01:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	"he has been devoured by a dinosaur although that '''probably''' did not kill him..."
		+	this isn't unknowable. can someone fact-check this?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/73.190.140.221\|73.190.140.221]] 16:47, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~-->		<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~-->

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ;punching
 No need to go to ostriches or emus, swans can fly well, and certainly take a punch, though i would *strongly* recommend against trying. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swan#/media/File:The_swan_attacks_man.Hokkaido-toyako,%E4%BA%BA%E3%82%92%E8%A5%B2%E3%81%86%E6%B4%9E%E7%88%BA%E6%B9%96%E3%81%AE%E7%99%BD%E9%B3%A5P6200258%E3%83%A2%E3%82%B6%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF.jpg]. Geese are also probably not much safer. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.43|162.158.89.43]] 12:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 ;Title text

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ;punching
 No need to go to ostriches or emus, swans can fly well, and certainly take a punch, though i would *strongly* recommend against trying. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swan#/media/File:The_swan_attacks_man.Hokkaido-toyako,%E4%BA%BA%E3%82%92%E8%A5%B2%E3%81%86%E6%B4%9E%E7%88%BA%E6%B9%96%E3%81%AE%E7%99%BD%E9%B3%A5P6200258%E3%83%A2%E3%82%B6%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF.jpg]. Geese are also probably not much safer. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.43|162.158.89.43]] 12:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 ;Title text

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ;punching
 No need to go to ostriches or emus, swans can fly well, and certainly take a punch, though i would *strongly* recommend against trying. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swan#/media/File:The_swan_attacks_man.Hokkaido-toyako,%E4%BA%BA%E3%82%92%E8%A5%B2%E3%81%86%E6%B4%9E%E7%88%BA%E6%B9%96%E3%81%AE%E7%99%BD%E9%B3%A5P6200258%E3%83%A2%E3%82%B6%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF.jpg]. Geese are also probably not much safer. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.43|162.158.89.43]] 12:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 ;Title text

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Also should we mention that a hta craft pwered by flapping would be an ornithopter.
-: Though an ornithopter most definitely counts as a heavier-than-air aircraft, referring to it as a plane would be inaccurate, as the term "plane" or "airplane" most often is used in reference to fixed-wing aircraft. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.198|162.158.107.198]] 00:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
+: Though an ornithopter most definitely counts as a heavier-than-air aircraft, referring to it as a plane would be inaccurate as that term is used specifically when referring to fixed-wing aircraft. If anything, an ornithopter would be closer to a helicopter than a plane.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.198|162.158.107.198]] 00:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 ;Mating & Peeping David