Talk:1813: Vomiting Emoji - Revision history

172.70.162.56: Courtesy change, only. Original author meant/needed to use capital 'A', and by setting it into a "template" template, it stops it being too WYSIWYG. Alternative being to `...` it, but this way shows that it's a real linkable!

2022-12-27T08:43:33Z

Courtesy change, only. Original author meant/needed to use capital 'A', and by setting it into a "template" template, it stops it being *too* WYSIWYG. Alternative being to <code><nowiki>...</nowiki></code> it, but this way shows that it's a real linkable!

AverseABFun: Added comment

2022-12-27T03:49:01Z

Added comment

AverseABFun: Added comment

2022-12-27T03:46:07Z

Added comment

WriterArtistCoder: Moved my comment "I tried making a few of these" to main topic

2020-05-23T18:04:48Z

Moved my comment "I tried making a few of these" to main topic

WriterArtistCoder: Added comment "I tried making a few of these:"

2020-05-23T18:03:58Z

Added comment "I tried making a few of these:"

RamenChef at 21:06, 3 September 2018

2018-09-03T21:06:45Z

108.162.212.47: emojis are inherently part of text

2017-04-16T13:55:27Z

emojis are inherently part of text

Mrob27 at 02:03, 6 April 2017

2017-04-06T02:03:42Z

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For at 15:14, 25 March 2017

2017-03-25T15:14:51Z

172.68.132.221 at 03:02, 24 March 2017

2017-03-24T03:02:45Z

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :::Citation needed ref to [[285]] should only be used when a citation is needed! And of course there should not be one here --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 ::::What? No, Citation needed is a joke. Hence why we link to a joke, not to some page about actually needing a citation. The moon being made of rock gets "citation needed" as a joke about it actually being made of green cheese. This is exactly how Randal often uses it. [[User:Trlkly|Trlkly]] ([[User talk:Trlkly|talk]]) 00:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
-::::Also if you need an actual citation needed, do a nice {{actual citation needed}} --[[User:AverseABFun|AverseABFun]] ([[User talk:AverseABFun|talk]]) 03:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
+::::Also if you need an actual citation needed, do a nice {{template|Actual citation needed}} --[[User:AverseABFun|AverseABFun]] ([[User talk:AverseABFun|talk]]) 03:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 ::The problem is, the [citation needed] is what started the edit war in the first place. [[User:RamenChef|RamenChef]] ([[User talk:RamenChef|talk]]) 00:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :::Citation needed ref to [[285]] should only be used when a citation is needed! And of course there should not be one here --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 ::::What? No, Citation needed is a joke. Hence why we link to a joke, not to some page about actually needing a citation. The moon being made of rock gets "citation needed" as a joke about it actually being made of green cheese. This is exactly how Randal often uses it. [[User:Trlkly|Trlkly]] ([[User talk:Trlkly|talk]]) 00:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 ::The problem is, the [citation needed] is what started the edit war in the first place. [[User:RamenChef|RamenChef]] ([[User talk:RamenChef|talk]]) 00:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 27 December 2022
Line 55:		Line 55:
	;Error in the description text		;Error in the description text
	The statement "emojis...aren't typically perceived as parts of text" is clearly incorrect. The entire purpose for which emojis were created is to express emotions in text (which can be difficult to convey in words); emojis are inherently part of text.		The statement "emojis...aren't typically perceived as parts of text" is clearly incorrect. The entire purpose for which emojis were created is to express emotions in text (which can be difficult to convey in words); emojis are inherently part of text.
		+
		+
		+	I wish I was a good enough artist to make images for the winking face vomiting. --[[User:AverseABFun\|AverseABFun]] ([[User talk:AverseABFun\|talk]]) 03:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Should the incomplete tag be removed? [[User:Dontknow|Dontknow]] ([[User talk:Dontknow|talk]]) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@@ Line 45: / Line 48: @@
 --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.221|172.68.132.221]] 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 :Got that in TTF format? [[User:RamenChef|RamenChef]] ([[User talk:RamenChef|talk]]) 21:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 ;Did Randall goof, or is it part of the joke?

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.221|172.68.132.221]] 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 :Got that in TTF format? [[User:RamenChef|RamenChef]] ([[User talk:RamenChef|talk]]) 21:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 ;Did Randall goof, or is it part of the joke?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 16 April 2017
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Megan proposes a single emoji, "U+IF93F" as the vomit modifier. How is possible, then, that in each implementation the vomit is a different shape and location? Is it possible to create an emoji that is self-aware and reconfigures itself as needed?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)		Megan proposes a single emoji, "U+IF93F" as the vomit modifier. How is possible, then, that in each implementation the vomit is a different shape and location? Is it possible to create an emoji that is self-aware and reconfigures itself as needed?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
	:Yes. To cite two examples I'm familiar with: The Fitzpatrick scale skin colour modifiers (U+1F3FB through U+1F3FF) affect whatever part of the emoji (hands, faces, etc.) is considered skin; and many of the "diacritical" or "accent mark" modifiers adjust their position as needed for whatever letter they're being added to, and many of those modifiers can make tall stacks. [[User:Mrob27\|Mrob27]] ([[User talk:Mrob27\|talk]]) 02:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)		:Yes. To cite two examples I'm familiar with: The Fitzpatrick scale skin colour modifiers (U+1F3FB through U+1F3FF) affect whatever part of the emoji (hands, faces, etc.) is considered skin; and many of the "diacritical" or "accent mark" modifiers adjust their position as needed for whatever letter they're being added to, and many of those modifiers can make tall stacks. [[User:Mrob27\|Mrob27]] ([[User talk:Mrob27\|talk]]) 02:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Error in the description text
		+	The statement "emojis...aren't typically perceived as parts of text" is clearly incorrect. The entire purpose for which emojis were created is to express emotions in text (which can be difficult to convey in words); emojis are inherently part of text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 6 April 2017
Line 47:		Line 47:
	;Did Randall goof, or is it part of the joke?		;Did Randall goof, or is it part of the joke?
	Megan proposes a single emoji, "U+IF93F" as the vomit modifier. How is possible, then, that in each implementation the vomit is a different shape and location? Is it possible to create an emoji that is self-aware and reconfigures itself as needed?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)		Megan proposes a single emoji, "U+IF93F" as the vomit modifier. How is possible, then, that in each implementation the vomit is a different shape and location? Is it possible to create an emoji that is self-aware and reconfigures itself as needed?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
		+	:Yes. To cite two examples I'm familiar with: The Fitzpatrick scale skin colour modifiers (U+1F3FB through U+1F3FF) affect whatever part of the emoji (hands, faces, etc.) is considered skin; and many of the "diacritical" or "accent mark" modifiers adjust their position as needed for whatever letter they're being added to, and many of those modifiers can make tall stacks. [[User:Mrob27\|Mrob27]] ([[User talk:Mrob27\|talk]]) 02:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 25 March 2017
Line 44:		Line 44:
	[http://carsonparkdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/B-Kliban-Barf-Bold.jpg]		[http://carsonparkdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/B-Kliban-Barf-Bold.jpg]
	--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.221\|172.68.132.221]] 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)		--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.221\|172.68.132.221]] 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Did Randall goof, or is it part of the joke?
		+	Megan proposes a single emoji, "U+IF93F" as the vomit modifier. How is possible, then, that in each implementation the vomit is a different shape and location? Is it possible to create an emoji that is self-aware and reconfigures itself as needed?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 15:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 24 March 2017
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Anyone can write and send proposal to Unicode Consortium, and I was thinking - anyone did it actually / gonna do it?		Anyone can write and send proposal to Unicode Consortium, and I was thinking - anyone did it actually / gonna do it?
	--[[User:Marsjaninzmarsa\|Marsjaninzmarsa]] ([[User talk:Marsjaninzmarsa\|talk]]) 23:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)		--[[User:Marsjaninzmarsa\|Marsjaninzmarsa]] ([[User talk:Marsjaninzmarsa\|talk]]) 23:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+
		+	'''Barf Bold A Decorative Typeface'''
		+	B. Kliban from 1982
		+
		+	[http://carsonparkdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/B-Kliban-Barf-Bold.jpg]
		+	--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.221\|172.68.132.221]] 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Talk:1813: Vomiting Emoji - Revision history

172.70.162.56: Courtesy change, only. Original author meant/needed to use capital 'A', and by setting it into a "template" template, it stops it being *too* WYSIWYG. Alternative being to ... it, but this way shows that it's a real linkable!

AverseABFun: Added comment

AverseABFun: Added comment

WriterArtistCoder: Moved my comment "I tried making a few of these" to main topic

WriterArtistCoder: Added comment "I tried making a few of these:"

RamenChef at 21:06, 3 September 2018

108.162.212.47: emojis are inherently part of text

Mrob27 at 02:03, 6 April 2017

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For at 15:14, 25 March 2017

172.68.132.221 at 03:02, 24 March 2017

172.70.162.56: Courtesy change, only. Original author meant/needed to use capital 'A', and by setting it into a "template" template, it stops it being too WYSIWYG. Alternative being to `...` it, but this way shows that it's a real linkable!