Talk:1847: Dubious Study - Revision history

GetPunnedOn at 00:49, 6 February 2025

2025-02-06T00:49:19Z

162.158.92.118 at 08:18, 13 June 2017

2017-06-13T08:18:34Z

NiceGuy1 at 06:40, 13 June 2017

2017-06-13T06:40:21Z

NiceGuy1 at 06:34, 13 June 2017

2017-06-13T06:34:49Z

108.162.219.64 at 03:23, 9 June 2017

2017-06-09T03:23:00Z

141.101.107.150: query reference size

2017-06-08T11:08:54Z

query reference size

108.162.246.71 at 15:59, 7 June 2017

2017-06-07T15:59:24Z

162.158.92.118 at 08:24, 7 June 2017

2017-06-07T08:24:56Z

Gjgfuj at 07:22, 7 June 2017

2017-06-07T07:22:32Z

Gjgfuj at 07:21, 7 June 2017

2017-06-07T07:21:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 6 February 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)		What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
	:When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Also my comment! [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 06:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)		:When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Also my comment! [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 06:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	90% of statistics are made up on the spot [[User:GetPunnedOn\|GetPunnedOn]] ([[User talk:GetPunnedOn\|talk]]) 00:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 "downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
-   --- but I would understand it as if the Journal was only downloaded twice within a year, i.e. only two people have downloaded (and maybe read) the Journal so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.118|162.158.92.118]] 08:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
+:but I would understand it as if the Journal was only downloaded twice within a year, i.e. only two people have downloaded (and maybe read) the Journal so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.118|162.158.92.118]] 08:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 13 June 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:

	What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)		What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
−	:When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)	+	:When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Also my comment! [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 06:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
-:I would only think the confusion was intentional if it was the other way around. If Randall had used "biennially", I could believe the idea was to let people think it was "biannual" - twice a year - but it's even more pathetic, only every two years. To fit in with the rest (letting people read "peer-viewed" as "peer-reviewed" for example) :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
+:I would only think the confusion was intentional if it was the other way around. If Randall had used "biennially", I could believe the idea was to let people think it was "biannual" - twice a year - but it's even more pathetic, only every two years. To fit in with the rest (letting people read "peer-viewed" as "peer-reviewed" for example) :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC) I finally signed up! This comment is mine. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 06:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 :When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 9 June 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
		+	:I would only think the confusion was intentional if it was the other way around. If Randall had used "biennially", I could believe the idea was to let people think it was "biannual" - twice a year - but it's even more pathetic, only every two years. To fit in with the rest (letting people read "peer-viewed" as "peer-reviewed" for example) :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

	What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)		What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
		+	:When I saw it yesterday I could ALMOST read it, but I did end up having to zoom in. It's definitely bigger now, I say it's good now. It's bordering on too big for the gag. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.64\|108.162.219.64]] 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 8 June 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	What size should the references be? 6 pixels is far too small. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.150\|141.101.107.150]] 11:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 7 June 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Although biannual conventionally means twice a year, its conflation with biennial (once every two years) is quite common. It would not be unthinkable that this confusion was intentional. ~~108.162.246.71, 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 7 June 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
		+	--- but I would understand it as if the Journal was only downloaded twice within a year, i.e. only two people have downloaded (and maybe read) the Journal so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.118\|162.158.92.118]] 08:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

	The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 7 June 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:
	"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

−	The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|~~The Awesome Gjgfuj~~]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)	+	The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|TheSandromatic]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 7 June 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)		"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --[[User:JakubNarebski\|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski\|talk]]) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. [[User:Gjgfuj\|The Awesome Gjgfuj]] ([[User talk:Gjgfuj\|talk]]) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)