Talk:1881: Drone Training - Revision history

172.70.90.121: BBC Roomba Breaks For Freedom

2022-01-24T07:37:08Z

BBC Roomba Breaks For Freedom

172.69.250.52: Added comment "Frankly, I'm surprised White Hat didn't think training a drone was a marvelous idea."

2019-08-09T00:53:35Z

Added comment "Frankly, I'm surprised White Hat didn't think training a drone was a marvelous idea."

Netherin5: Idea

2018-11-30T16:09:42Z

Idea

162.158.155.98 at 11:44, 15 March 2018

2018-03-15T11:44:24Z

162.158.114.40: /* Mitchell and Webb */ new section

2017-10-25T07:26:48Z

‎Mitchell and Webb: new section

Dgbrt: New comment to the bottom.

2017-09-09T21:47:40Z

New comment to the bottom.

162.158.166.209 at 04:29, 31 August 2017

2017-08-31T04:29:58Z

198.41.242.101 at 16:07, 28 August 2017

2017-08-28T16:07:39Z

Elektrizikekswerk at 09:19, 28 August 2017

2017-08-28T09:19:35Z

Elektrizikekswerk at 08:07, 28 August 2017

2017-08-28T08:07:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:37, 24 January 2022
Line 33:		Line 33:

	I always though that it was to be taken away because it didn’t have a collar on, to which Black Hat will explain that it’s white hat’s fault.		I always though that it was to be taken away because it didn’t have a collar on, to which Black Hat will explain that it’s white hat’s fault.
		+
		+
		+	Roombs NEED to be leashed
		+	https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-60084347
		+	[[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.121\|172.70.90.121]] 07:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+
	== Mitchell and Webb ==		== Mitchell and Webb ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 9 August 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:

	I feel strongly that the comic is a reference to the "The Mitchell and Webb look" episode "Poison" (can be found on YouTube) in which a man comes into a series of stores increasingly unlikely to find things that can kill, hurt or maim people, yet still persists in trying to attain such a thing from the store's owner. It is implied that he wants to use what he buys in order to get rid of his wife, with whom he seems to have had a falling-out. Should I include the possibility of a reference in the comic's explanation?		I feel strongly that the comic is a reference to the "The Mitchell and Webb look" episode "Poison" (can be found on YouTube) in which a man comes into a series of stores increasingly unlikely to find things that can kill, hurt or maim people, yet still persists in trying to attain such a thing from the store's owner. It is implied that he wants to use what he buys in order to get rid of his wife, with whom he seems to have had a falling-out. Should I include the possibility of a reference in the comic's explanation?
		+
		+	Frankly, I'm surprised White Hat didn't think training a drone was a marvelous idea.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 The explanation omits what seems to be a likely idea, that Black Hat is a prankster who is deliberately winding up White Hat by pretending his devices are animals, while in the title text animal control seeks to out-prank Black Hat by doing the same.11:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 == Mitchell and Webb  ==
 I feel strongly that the comic is a reference to the "The Mitchell and Webb look" episode "Poison" (can be found on YouTube) in which a man comes into a series of stores increasingly unlikely to find things that can kill, hurt or maim people, yet still persists in trying to attain such a thing from the store's owner. It is implied that he wants to use what he buys in order to get rid of his wife, with whom he seems to have had a falling-out. Should I include the possibility of a reference in the comic's explanation?

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 My first wiki page, glad to see that what I wrote was kept! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.209|162.158.166.209]] 04:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 == Mitchell and Webb  ==
 I feel strongly that the comic is a reference to the "The Mitchell and Webb look" episode "Poison" (can be found on YouTube) in which a man comes into a series of stores increasingly unlikely to find things that can kill, hurt or maim people, yet still persists in trying to attain such a thing from the store's owner. It is implied that he wants to use what he buys in order to get rid of his wife, with whom he seems to have had a falling-out. Should I include the possibility of a reference in the comic's explanation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:26, 25 October 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:

	My first wiki page, glad to see that what I wrote was kept! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.209\|162.158.166.209]] 04:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)		My first wiki page, glad to see that what I wrote was kept! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.209\|162.158.166.209]] 04:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Mitchell and Webb ==
		+
		+	I feel strongly that the comic is a reference to the "The Mitchell and Webb look" episode "Poison" (can be found on YouTube) in which a man comes into a series of stores increasingly unlikely to find things that can kill, hurt or maim people, yet still persists in trying to attain such a thing from the store's owner. It is implied that he wants to use what he buys in order to get rid of his wife, with whom he seems to have had a falling-out. Should I include the possibility of a reference in the comic's explanation?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
 "This is the first comic to feature Black Hat, White Hat, and no other character." Is this correct. Which other comics feature both "hats".[[User:Zeimusu|Zeimusu]] ([[User talk:Zeimusu|talk]]) 14:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 :I've removed this from the explanation. Even when this is true it's not worth to be mentioned unless this really has a connection to the content of the comic. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 Is that interpretation of the alt text likely? My initial thought was that Black Hat's Roomba would be taken custody of because of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. (Well, actually, it was more like "aren't shock collars a form of animal abuse?") [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.166|162.158.2.166]] 16:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
@@ Line 30: / Line 25: @@
 The shock collar works with a wire surrounding the allowed perimeter of the dog/roomba. The same technology is used for automatic lawnmowers which are basically garden-roombas. So this isn't as far fetched as one might think... [[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.101|198.41.242.101]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 31 August 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->		<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
		+
		+	My first wiki page, glad to see that what I wrote was kept! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.209\|162.158.166.209]] 04:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

	"This is the first comic to feature Black Hat, White Hat, and no other character." Is this correct. Which other comics feature both "hats".[[User:Zeimusu\|Zeimusu]] ([[User talk:Zeimusu\|talk]]) 14:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)		"This is the first comic to feature Black Hat, White Hat, and no other character." Is this correct. Which other comics feature both "hats".[[User:Zeimusu\|Zeimusu]] ([[User talk:Zeimusu\|talk]]) 14:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 28 August 2017
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I was going to say the statement that there's 3 possible explanations was wrong, that the other 2 aren't feasible, the title text means Black Hat's Roomba is being abused and Animal Control will take it. I had to read these comments to understand the idea that Black Hat could be saying this, and he's predicting White Hat's Roomba will escape and be caught. And now I like that version better, LOL! I forget what the 3rd is, which shows how unlikely I find it. :) [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 03:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)		I was going to say the statement that there's 3 possible explanations was wrong, that the other 2 aren't feasible, the title text means Black Hat's Roomba is being abused and Animal Control will take it. I had to read these comments to understand the idea that Black Hat could be saying this, and he's predicting White Hat's Roomba will escape and be caught. And now I like that version better, LOL! I forget what the 3rd is, which shows how unlikely I find it. :) [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 03:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	The shock collar works with a wire surrounding the allowed perimeter of the dog/roomba. The same technology is used for automatic lawnmowers which are basically garden-roombas. So this isn't as far fetched as one might think... [[Special:Contributions/198.41.242.101\|198.41.242.101]]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 : Imho it would be really cool if you could teach an AI things without using any software, e.g. no programmatic way or app needed. Personally I'd prefer using a spray bottle over an app or similar. And I'm saying this as a professional software developer. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 10:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 ::It would still need to be PROGRAMMED to interpret spraying as negative reinforcement. Also have sensors capable of recognizing it has been sprayed. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
-::: Of course, but that programming would have been done by the manufacturer. While I interpret JakubNarebski's comment as the programming needed to be done by the customer. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:07, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
+::: Of course, but that programming would have been done by the manufacturer (/edit: Or by the device itself). While I interpret JakubNarebski's comment as the programming needed to be done by the customer. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:07, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 : 60 years ago when televisions had vacuum tubes instead of integrated circuits and the picture would get fuzzy, you could ''teach'' it to behave by slapping the side of the case. *wink*  [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 12:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)